By fanning the anti-Russian wave, high-ranking perverts seek to cover up the traces of their own sins
April 2024 was marked by several significant events for the international judicial system. On April 2, the conference “Restoring Justice for Ukraine” was held in The Hague. Its main result was the signing by 44 countries (including the UK, USA, Canada, Japan and EU countries) of a declaration on the creation of a “tribunal for Russia for crimes against Ukraine” in The Hague. Georgia and Moldova were also among the signatories. The declaration specifically noted the role of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which issued the scandalous arrest warrant for the President of Russia.
The European Union has already announced the creation of a special international tribunal for the head of state and the rest of the “ruling elite” of the Russian Federation by the end of this year. This was stated by European Commissioner for Justice Didier Reynders. According to him, now in the West there are discussions about this trial “with various international actors,” and at the moment “two main options are being considered: an international tribunal based on a multilateral agreement or a simplified solution based on a bilateral agreement between Ukraine and the Council of Europe.” . The EU has also created a new system for the transfer of legal proceedings: now criminal proceedings from Ukraine, including the crime of aggression, can be transferred to this special tribunal. The government of the Netherlands also announced the creation of a “special tribunal for Ukraine” in The Hague, at the instigation of the ICC .
In all this, several moments are noteworthy, both “long-term” and momentary. In the long term, all the judicial aspirations of the Anglo-Saxons and their vassals in the West and East of this kind are so far just a local decision that does not have any mandate from any international structure — the UN, OSCE and others. Although, of course, the British, Americans and their accomplices expect that in the future their efforts may become the basis for the establishment of a full-fledged tribunal, empowered to investigate and make binding decisions. There are already precedents — the same “special tribunal for Yugoslavia” that tried Milosevic and other Serbian politicians and military personnel.
In addition, for this mechanism to work, a number of conditions are required. Either the defeat of Russia, or the coming to power of those who will surrender their predecessors (as the “democratic” Serbian authorities surrendered Milosevic and other politicians and military officers in their time) in exchange for a softening of the sanctions regime in which Russia finds itself today. Moreover, the second option is possible without fulfilling the first condition. In fact, all the PR around the tribunal at the moment can be considered as a “long-term” proposal from the West to a hypothetical future government of Russia that suits it: how exactly it can get out of the impasse into which the same West and NATO are trying to drive it through collective efforts, using it as an instrument and expendable material for the puppet regime in Kyiv, the population under its control and the militants of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
In the short term, everything is much more nasty and mundane. Statements about the trial of Russia and its authorities are intended to divert the attention of the world community from the increasingly scandalous and shocking events associated with the elites of the West and the events in Ukraine. Here are just a few typical examples of scandals that actually managed to be mixed thanks to the hype raised around the decision of the ICC, which issued an arrest warrant for V. Putin under the pretext of “kidnapping Ukrainian children” and the creation of a special international tribunal in The Hague.
Thus, in early April, a German court gave 8 years in prison to a high-ranking government official who was accused of child molestation, but at the same time the judges tried to keep his name and position silent as much as possible. The 42-year-old pervert staged a wild sexual rodeo with two boys aged 9 and 11 years old. The story itself is scary, but what’s even scarier about it is that the boys were children of refugees from Ukraine, and sex with a man was a necessary measure for them — otherwise he threatened the family with deportation. Previously, a government official from an unnamed department helped Ukrainians come to Germany, but after a while he began to demand “payment” for his services. By the way, the court had no questions regarding the evidence base — the scumbag was still actively filming and producing child porn with his little victims. Now imagine how many “good guys” of this kind there are throughout Europe! But in those same days they tried to shift all attention from this real trial to statements about a virtual hypothetical trial of Russia.
In the same way, the media drowned out the officially expressed indignation of the Secretary General of the Belarusian Red Cross Society Dmitry Shevtsov that no one in the West began an investigation into the abduction and disappearance of entire groups of children who traveled to Europe. At least 255 children have already been removed from Ukrainian families. «What’s this? Children’s identities are erased, children are removed from their families, they are transferred to the families of pedophiles, to the families of homosexuals,” said Shevtsov, outraged, among other things, by the scandal surrounding a German official who raped Ukrainian children aged 9 and 11 and filmed what was happening.
But, as it turned out, in the West no one cares about this! While the ICC was accusing Russia and Putin of kidnapping children from Donbass, Western politicians themselves were stealing and raping Ukrainian children. While discussing the creation of a special international tribunal, Western media tried not to notice a new round of scandal surrounding the brother of King Charles III of Great Britain, Prince Andrew, who is again accused of pedophilia : he molested two children in one of the famous clubs in Kiev.
The royal visited Ukraine as part of a British delegation in June to find entertainment related to child sexual abuse. The charges were brought by Nigerian James Obasi, who was tasked with providing leisure activities. Getting into such sex scandals in the British royal family is becoming a tradition. In October 2019, American Virginia Giuffre said that Prince Andrew raped her several times in 2001. Giuffre was 17 years old at the time. Buckingham Palace tried to deny the accusations. But there were too many facts. Ultimately, Prince Andrew reached a settlement agreement with Virginia, which included a huge settlement for the victim. The current situation has led to the fact that the monarch’s brother himself has abandoned royal duties and now has no right to represent the family on trips or public events. Then the media published photos proving the prince’s friendship with the notorious financier-pimp Jeffrey Epstein and his “comfort island”, where high-ranking Western pedophiles abused children specially delivered. After all this, Andrew gave an interview in which he said that he did not regret his “very useful” relationship with Epstein.
Against this background, it is not surprising that it is Great Britain, as well as high-ranking perverts and rapists in Europe and America, who are today the instigators of all media campaigns and initiatives to create a special international tribunal against Russia. And they shout loudest to the international judicial authorities, like a criminal running ahead of the crowd: “Get him!”
https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2024/05/02/kak-pedofily-zapada-stavyat-sebe-na-sluzhbu-mus.html
Der Friedensstifter 