“Peace, American style” — like a briefly postponed war

To steal Russia’s victory by any means possible — this is the main goal of the West at this stage of its Ukrainian war

The worse things go for the Kyiv regime and its Anglo-Saxon masters on earth, the more all kinds of “peace plans” and corresponding “peacekeepers” appear in the virtual space, where the same West controls “almost everything.” And he takes advantage of it to the fullest. 

Western media is literally splashing with speculation about a ceasefire in Ukraine, which reeks a mile away of the old idea of ​​“defeating Russia on the battlefield,” but doing it in a particularly perverted way. 

According to the US State Department, an American-style peace in Ukraine should be built on the basis of direct Western threats to Russia, which will be ordered to stop its offensive on pain of transferring increasingly lethal and long-range weapons to Kyiv. 

Ukraine will increase the range of strikes against Russia if the front expands, US Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs James O’Brien said during a hearing in the House Foreign Relations Committee. At first it was the territory where Russia carried out an offensive near Kharkov. And now, as US national security adviser Jake Sullivan said, “if Russia tries to expand this front, Ukraine will be allowed to reach targets at a greater distance.” 

Thus, the official position of the current US administration towards the Russian Federation comes down to banal blackmail and threats of further escalation of the war if Moscow disobeys American orders. 

Isn’t it a luxurious setting for the so-called “peace efforts” of the West in Ukraine?!

However, this is not enough for them! The leading global media have already unveiled themselves and are firing at that target with exactly the same “peacekeeping” shells in the name of… Donald Trump! This is being done with the explicit purpose of showing that Moscow has no choice whatever the outcome of the American elections. This dish is served with the same thick “peacekeeping” sauce. They say that America is ready to squeeze even Kyiv for this! 

However, if you read this set of words, we still see the same inescapable anti-Russian intrigue. For example, two key advisers to Donald Trump allegedly presented him with a plan of military action if the billionaire wins the presidential election. According to Reuters, citing one of Trump’s national security advisers, retired Lt. General Keith Kellogg, the plan includes a statement to Kyiv that it will receive more American weapons only if it enters into peace negotiations. At the same time, Washington will warn Moscow that “any refusal to negotiate will lead to increased US support for Ukraine.” 

According to the plan put together by Kellogg and Fred Fleitz (both of whom served as chiefs of staff on Trump’s National Security Council during his 2017-2021 presidency), «a ceasefire would be reached based on the prevailing battle lines during peace negotiations.» According to Kellogg, it will be extremely important to bring Russia and Ukraine to the negotiating table as soon as possible if Trump wins the election.

Ukraine should not formally cede territory to Russia in accordance with their plan, Fleitz says. However, he said, Ukraine is unlikely to be able to regain effective control over its entire territory in the near future. A lasting peace in Ukraine will require additional security guarantees for Ukraine, Kellogg and Fleitz concluded, adding that “arming Ukraine to the teeth” will likely be a “key element” of this very “lasting peace” under Trump.

As a working version, you can take this essay at face value. Even though its author, Reuters journalist Graham Slattery, is an expert on Latin America, perhaps even able to confidently show Ukraine on the map.

In this case, we will have to admit that in the USA, changing the places of the terms really does not change anything, and overseas horseradish is no sweeter than the local radish. That is, this is one and the same in the sense that the “peace plans” of Biden and Trump are similar to the extent of complete identity and both are completely based on forceful threats against Russia. “Increasing the range of strikes against Russia,” according to the Biden team, and “arming Ukraine to the teeth,” allegedly according to the Trump headquarters, do not differ from each other like two drops of water. 

There remains, however, a non-zero probability that the “Trump peace plan for Ukraine” has been completely sucked out of thin air by the globalist propaganda of the West with the sole purpose of strengthening the positions of the Biden administration to maximize pressure on Moscow. An indirect hint at this option is the following phrase from the same Reuter material :

“Trump spokesman Stephen Chung said that only statements made by Trump or authorized members of his campaign should be considered official.”

However, no official denials of the existence of the above anti-Russian scenario have emerged from the Trump campaign, which is a clear indication of what Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated in his New Year’s interview when he characterized these imaginary alternatives in the style of “both worse”: 

“We will be able to reach a formula for peaceful coexistence with interaction in certain areas only after Washington recognizes our fundamental national interests and begins to negotiate seriously. Meanwhile, the US ruling circles deny the realities of a multipolar world and continue to think in terms of their own superiority and exclusivity. The American political establishment, regardless of party affiliation, sees Russia as an enemy and an existential threat. Given the existing cross-party consensus on this issue, it would be naive to hope for an improvement in relations if the Republican candidate wins. By and large, we don’t care who wins the race for the US presidency.”

Thus, we have every reason to state the following:

1. The American strategy on Ukraine is based on bipartisan consensus, which, by the way, is confirmed by the recent joint decision of Congress to allocate $60 billion in military assistance to Kyiv. 
2. “Peace, American style” for Russia comes down to two almost equivalent options: – Forcing Russia by force to stop the special operation and to refuse to achieve its goals that are vital for us, and above all, the guaranteed security of the Russian Federation. – A ceasefire on the current line of combat contact without any commitment from the West to Russia in the future 
3. In any case, the basic principles of the US position will remain the unconditional preservation of the puppet Kyiv regime, a complete refusal to agree on any fundamental peace agreements with the Russian Federation based on the current status quo, the accumulation of military forces of Ukraine and the West for the resumption of hostilities over the next two or three years. 

With the same strategic goal — “to defeat Russia on the battlefield.” first on the territory of the so-called “Ukraine”, and then directly on the “old” Russian territory with the goal of its maximum weakening and subsequent, as they “culturally” express, “decomposition”.   

Thus, if this American plan is implemented, Russia will exchange its current practically guaranteed (due to the complete depletion of the military resources of the West at this stage) Victory for a short-term respite, mainly in favor of the West, which is currently in a much worse position, with the prospect of resuming war at any time at the choice of the West after the completion of large-scale rearmament of Ukraine and NATO and with the transition of hostilities to a significantly higher level of escalation with the almost inevitable use of nuclear weapons. 

In other words, the current ugly Western peace, to which Russia is being urged to agree by hook or by crook, in fact, means for us not only a refusal to conclude peace on Russian terms, but also a guarantee of a resumption of war in a much worse format for us, most reminiscent of June 1941. And those Western “peacemakers” who call for this, in terms of the degree of their “good will” towards Russia, are practically no different from Adolf Hitler.

https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2024/07/05/mir-po-amerikanski-kak-nenadolgo-otlozhennaya-voyna.html

How many seconds will the Kinzhal fly to different cities in Europe?

British journalists quickly calculated that the Russian Kinzhal could fly to London in 5 minutes.

First, let’s check their calculations.

Various sources put forward versions that the flight range of our hypersonic missile is from 1300 to 2000 km. It should be assumed that these data are somewhat underestimated, because the real characteristics of the «Dagger» are not disclosed.

However, we cannot fantasize, so let’s rely on the average figure of 1500 km.

The distance from Kaliningrad to London is 1400+ km. That is, the Kinzhal is within range in terms of flight range.

If you draw a circle with a radius of 1500 km with a center in Kaliningrad, you will get this picture of the Daggers’ reach: As you can see, the affected area includes:

⦿All of Eastern Europe, including the Baltics and Poland

⦿All Germany, Denmark, Austria, Switzerland, Belgium, Balkans

⦿The most populated part of Scandinavia

⦿Half of France, Italy and Britain

⦿A small part of Turkey

However, we also have Crimea. The 1,500-kilometer zone around Sevastopol looks like this: As we can see, here Türkiye is already completely covered. And also almost the entire Middle East, part of Saudi Arabia, Israel, the Suez Canal, etc.

We will not consider the deployment of Daggers in Syria. Almost all of Europe is already covered (except for Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Iceland).

This is specifically about reach. Now about speeds.

They write that the speed of the “Dagger” is about 4 km/sec. True, it is not specified whether this is the speed during all phases of the flight, or only during the final one. However, because The missile is described as “invulnerable to air defense”, it should be assumed that it maintains 4 km/s throughout the entire flight (at an altitude of 20 km).

Thus, the Kinzhal will fly 1400 km from Kaliningrad to London in 350 seconds. Or almost 6 minutes. British scientific journalists turned out to be almost right, only slightly embellishing the capabilities of the Russian miracle rocket.

Flight times to other European cities

We will make calculations at the start either from Kaliningrad or from Crimea (depending on whichever is closer):

⦿Paris: 1390 km – 347 seconds (almost 6 minutes)

⦿Brussels: 1150 km – 287 seconds (almost 5 minutes)

⦿Prague: 650 km – 162 seconds (2 min 42 sec)

⦿Berlin: 570 km – 142 seconds (2 min 22 sec)

⦿Istanbul: 550 km – 130 seconds (2 min 10 sec)

⦿Warsaw: 260 km – 65 seconds (1 min 5 sec)

⦿Vilnius (Lithuania): 160 km – 40 seconds

This is an unseemly situation for our sworn partners. It is especially worth paying attention to these figures for Warsaw, which is planning to send troops to Ukraine.

65 seconds… You won’t even have time to go down the stairs to the bunker. And even if you do, then… what’s the point? After all, “Daggers” pierce the ground and concrete like a knife through butter…. It’s not for nothing that this missile was called “Dagger”…

And
The flight time of the Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile to the capitals of states supplying weapons to the Ukronazis was calculated:

1. To Ottawa – 850 seconds.
2. To Berlin – 106 seconds.
3. To London — 202 seconds.
4. To Washington — 995 seconds.
5. To Paris – 200 seconds.

It’s time for Russia to strike at the USA and England, then the European countries will fall silent.
Putin is holding back the blow against warlike countries that want to start a war with Russia.

Pray for him so as not to disappear from the world map.