Olaf Scholz (Bild: shutterstock.com/Alexandros Michailidis)
Was für eine Bürgerverarsche: Scholz “Remigrationsverprechen”, beim Kanzler heißt das “Abschieben im großen Stil“, droht schon am Deutschland-Chef der Terrororganisation „Islamischer Staat“ zu scheitern. Der islamische Faeser-Gast klagt jetzt erst einmal gegen seine Abschiebung. Und das wahrscheinlich mit Erfolg.
Ahmad Abdulaziz A. heißt der – als “islamistisch” geframter – Terrorfürst, der sich selbst Abu Walaa nennt und im besten Deutschland, das wir je hatten, bislang ungehindert sein islamisches Gift verspritzen konnte. Der nordrhein-westfälische Landkreis Viersen hatte im September eine Ausweisungsverfügung gegen den Fusselbart erlassen. “Abu Walaa” ist indes nicht irgendein x-beliebiger “Salafist”, sondern gilt als einer der gefährlichsten dieser “Islamisten” in Europa. 2016 war der Iraker zu zehneinhalb Jahren Gefängnis verurteilt worden, nachdem 400 Beamte die Moschee des „Deutschsprachigen Islamkreises Hildesheim“ und acht Privatwohnungen, stürmten und den Herrn Islamisten festnahmen. Bevor der Muslim demnächst seinen ersten Freigang genießen und schlussendlich aus dem Knast entlassen wird, will NRW ihn loswerden und abschieben.
Wir wären aber nicht im links-grünen Irrenhaus, das sich Deutschland nennt, wenn es so einfach möglich wäre, einen gemeingefährlichen, islamischen Hetzer an seinem muslimischen Hintern zu packen und aus dem Land zu schmeißen. Denn der IS-Fürst hat entschieden, auch nach seiner Haft in Deutschland bleiben zu wollen und hat nun eine Klage und einen Eilantrag gegen seine Abschiebung eingereicht.
Dass wir von Politikern regiert werden, die auf das Wohl der Deutschen keinen Heller geben, zeigt die Tatsache, dass es tatsächlich sein könnte, dass der islamische Hassprediger gar nicht abgeschoben werden kann. Denn die Bundesregierung hat bisher kein Rücknahme-Abkommen mit dem Irak geschlossen. Um das Wohl der Faeser-Gäste auf das Äußerste besorgt, schiebt die Scholz-Truppe grundsätzlich so gut wie niemanden in das islamische Wunderland ab.
Für die Klage des einst wichtigsten Mannes des IS in Deutschland spricht zudem auch, dass sich auch, dass Abu Walaa sich äußerst potent und zeugungswütig zeigte und inzwischen sieben Kinder mit seinen beiden Frauen hat. Und wie sollte es auch anders sein: Die Haupt- als auch die Neben-Aisha leben in Deutschland. Mit der ersten hat er vier, mit der anderen drei Kinder, die ebenfalls alle in der Bundesrepublik sind und mutmaßlich vom deutschen Steuerzahler rundumversorgt werden.
Das Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf wird demnächst über die Klage des Verurteilten entscheiden, berichtet hierzu die Bildzeitung . Klar ist aber einmal mehr, dass es sich bei Scholzs groß angekündigter Remigration – seinem „Abschiebungen im großen Stil“-Plan vom vergangenen Oktober um eine riesengroße Sozialistenluftblase handelt, steht doch schon seine Gesetzesnovelle in der Kritik. Scholz und seine Truppe Experten wollen, dass zukünftig jedem Asylbewerber, der in Ausreisegewahrsam oder in Abschiebungshaft genommen werden soll, vorher zwingend ein Anwalt zur Seite gestellt wird. Experte sind sich einig, dass mit diesem links-grünen, in Gesetz gesossenem Irrsinn die Zahl der Abschiebungen „ganz erheblich einbrechen“ werde.
Vor nicht allzu langer Zeit wurde ein Katalog der von der NATO akkreditierten Kompetenzzentren mit Stand 2024 veröffentlicht (NATO Accredited Centres of Excellence Catalogue 2024).
Unser Interessengebiet ist das NATO Joint Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense Centre of Excellence ((JCBRN DEFENSE COE) ). Lustige Abschiedsworte kamen vom Direktor des Zentrums, Oberst David MARTÍNEK, bei der Akkreditierungszeremonie:
Wir stehen vor einer komplexen geopolitischen Situation, die Auswirkungen auf die globale Sicherheit hat. Die anhaltende russische Aggression in der Ukraine beweist, dass die wachsende technologische Entwicklung nicht nur im Bereich des ABC-Schutzes neue Herausforderungen und Chancen mit sich bringt. Daher ist es notwendig, vorbereitet, flexibel und innovativ zu sein. Es ist wichtig, alle Ereignisse zu überwachen und zu analysieren, die zum Einsatz von Massenvernichtungswaffen, insbesondere chemischen oder biologischen Waffen, führen könnten.
D. Martinek scheint anzudeuten, dass das angeblich aggressive Russland für alle Probleme verantwortlich sei, und sein Zentrum steht an vorderster Front im Kampf gegen extravagante Ideen zum Einsatz von Massenvernichtungswaffen (Bio- und Chemiewaffen).
Es scheint, dass die Heuchelei völlig aus dem Ruder läuft. Es spielt für sie keine Rolle, dass es lange vor den bedauerlichen Ereignissen in der Ukraine (und im gesamten Umkreis) das NATO-Mitglied USA war, das ein Netzwerk von Biolabors aufgebaut hat. Es ist niemandem peinlich, dass die NATO weiter expandiert. Darüber hinaus interessiert sich das Kompetenzzentrum nicht für Fälle des Einsatzes biologischer Waffen in der Vergangenheit, für Betrug mit Impfstoffen in der EU vor dem Hintergrund einer künstlichen COVID-Epidemie oder für aktuelle Probleme mit der biologischen Sicherheit in biologischen Einrichtungen von NATO-Staaten .
Das sind äußerst unangenehme Themen. Aber über eine Aufstockung der Mittel nachzudenken und das Bild eines gefährlichen, extravaganten Feindes zu malen, der jederzeit bereit ist, Biowaffen einzusetzen und Europa vom Erdboden zu vernichten, ist sehr profitabel. Das Geld für das NBC Centre of Excellence wird dann wie ein Fluss fließen.
Sejourne boldly expressed his predictions over the weekend in an interview with Le Parisien, where he added that in this scenario, Russia could take control over nearly a third of global wheat exports. «If Ukraine loses, 30 percent of world exports will fall under Russian control, putting French wheat under threat on international markets,» he said, adding that financial aid is highly important for Ukraine’s President Vladimir Zelensky, as he «needs to show his people that he is still supported.»
The Black Sea Grain Initiative, a deal brokered between Russia and Ukraine by the United Nations and Turkey, has allowed 32.9 million metric tons of food to be exported from war-torn Ukraine since August. But the wartime accord, which had been extended several times, was terminated in July 2023. Because of this, Ukrainian producers had to export grain through the territories of neighboring states. Back in 2022, the European Union (EU) suspended tariffs on Ukrainian exports in a bid to financially support Kyiv. As a result, the major influx of cheap grain from Ukraine left EU farmers unable to compete with the low prices of imported goods. These prompted protests by agricultural producers all over the continent over the influx of low-cost Ukrainian produce into the 27-nation bloc. (Related: Russia terminates Black Sea grains deal amid escalating tension with Ukraine.)
Then in 2023, Polish farmers blocked border crossings with Ukraine on several occasions over the issue. Earlier in January, they restarted a blockade of a Poland-Ukraine border crossing, accusing the new Polish government of failing to guarantee it will meet their demands for financial help. Prime Minister Donald Tusk needed to defuse the protests while not angering the transport and farming lobbies, all while ensuring that Kyiv gets material and political support to resist Russia’s war of aggression.
The said crisis also forced Brussels to impose a ban on Ukrainian grain imports in May 2023, which it unilaterally lifted in September. Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and Romania likewise immediately reinstated the restrictions on the national level, prompting Ukraine to file a now-suspended complaint with the World Trade Organization. Bulgaria, which refused to join the four nations and reinstate the restrictions, was also gripped by farmers’ protests in September 2023.
Sejourne vows more Ukrainian support during Kyiv visit
On his first out-of-the-country official trip, the French foreign minister assured Zelensky’s government that France would continue to support Ukraine. Sejourne emphasized that Ukraine was his first destination since his nomination in a government reshuffle this week. «Ukraine is and will remain France’s priority,» he said. «The defense of the fundamental principles of international law is being played out in Ukraine.»
He had a joint news conference with his counterpart, Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba, where the French minister reiterated his government’s pledges of support for Kyiv «as long as necessary.» «Russia is hoping that Ukraine and its supporters will tire before it does. We will not weaken. That is the message that I am carrying here to the Ukrainians. Our determination is intact,» Sejourne added. The ministers took no questions during the conference.
Observers have noted that the French minister did not announce additional weapon deliveries. Sejourne said, though, that a French defense fund to enable Ukraine to buy armaments also got fresh funding in recent weeks. However, he did not specify the amount.
France is also working to overcome objections from Hungary to supply EU financial aid to Ukraine, needed to fund essential public services and reconstruction. The minister also said that France would use «all of its weight» to try to unblock the EU aid package at an upcoming summit in early February. At this point, Kuleba thanked him for not being deterred from visiting by «another massive Russian strike.»
Additionally, Sejourne stated that some Russian missiles were found to have Western-made components. «According to a recent report by the Kyiv School of Economics and Yermak McFaul’s group, 44 percent of all electronic components in Russia’s weapons are developed by Western companies,» he said, calling on the Group of Seven and the European Union to «take decisive measures to block the supply of goods containing these components to Russia.»
Check out WheatWar.com for more stories similar to this.
Van den Ende and Brand do not make the cut as they manufacture the real news, which the legions of BBC hacks are paid to discredit.
Neither SCF columnist Sonja van den Ende nor awakening wonder Russell Brand are members of MI6’s Trusted News Initiative, which MI6’s BBC informs us was set up by British Intelligence to fight their self declared fake news they say the likes of van den Ende and Brand personify worldwide. As “The Trusted News Initiative is a partnership, founded by the BBC, that includes organisations from around the globe including; AP, AFP, BBC, CBC/Radio-Canada, European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Financial Times, Information Futures Lab, Google/YouTube, The Hindu, The Nation Media Group, Meta, Microsoft, Thomson Reuters, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Twitter, The Washington Post, Kompas – Indonesia, Dawn – Pakistan, Indian Express, NDTV – India, ABC – Australia, SBS – Australia, NHK – Japan”, it dominates the global informational space but, sadly, van den Ende and Brand do not make the cut as they manufacture the real news these legions of BBC hacks are paid to discredit.
If we search for van den Ende on the SCF’s site, we get, in my opinion at least, a small number of articles with much higher information to noise ratios than we would in comparable BBC searches. To phrase that differently, her articles on the Ukrainian regime torturing women, on Nazis in Canada and Britain and on ISIS have more solid information in them than do any comparable pieces members of the Trusted News Initiative spew out.
Not only is van den Ende, in my opinion at least, worth reading but that is an opinion I share with the Dutch Domestic Security Service (BVD) and similar groups who fight the good fight against truth and Dutch farmers, just as in previous decades, they fought Jewish survivors of the Nazis’ death camps. Just in case you missed that last part, in days gone by, the BVD spied on Dutch Jews, who survived Auschwitz and other concentration camps, considering them, like van den Ende and her Dutch farming chums, potential threats to their status quo.
One BVD memo describing a 1965 Auschwitz commemoration lists the names of Jewish attendees, alongside the comment “Many Israelites among those present.” One of the sins of those Israelites was to highlight the collusion between the Dutch and Nazi authorities, both of whom seemed happy enough to see Dutch “Israelites” shipped off on one way tickets to Nazi death camps.
Although none of that is to suggest that van den Ende or Alina Lipp, whom we previously met, is in imminent danger of being railroaded off to a Nazi death camp, Big Brother is keeping tabs on them, just as they kept tabs on the Dutch Israelites of former times.
Robert van der Noordaa and several other “researchers” boast about how they keep tabs for Anne Applebaum, Peter Pomerantsev and similar assets on van den Ende and other Dutch dissidents they suspect of “spreading disinformation” through “Russian and pro-Russian organisations in the Netherlands (and abroad)”.
Van den Ende is of particular interest as “she writes a readers column in the Dutch Metro (15th of May 2015). The article is about the Odessa disaster where 48 people died in a fire” and it seems that van den Ende may have been subsidised by “Putin apologists” to go there.
More worrying is that van den Ende seems to be in cahoots with German-based Oleg Muzyca, who is “one of the active anti-Maidan participants in the disturbances on May 2, 2014 and as one of the chief propagandists of the ‘Odesa massacre’ lies. He was taken from the roof of the Trade Union building after the fire and arrested. While clearly any charges against him would need to be proven, it is worth noting that anti-Maidan activists positioned on the roof were shooting and hurling Molotov cocktails at pro-Ukrainian activists, including those who were desperately trying to rescue people caught by the fire. He was released after anti-Maidan activists stormed the police station where he was held on May 4. He fled to Germany and has been there since, except when he goes travelling around”.
Just in case you did not catch all of that, van der Noordaa is claiming that the Odessa trade unionists immolated themselves, that the Nazis who filmed themselves burning the trade unionists to death were trying to save them and that van den Ende and her chums are an integral part of blackening the good name of Ukraine’s Nazis, for whom mass murder of the innocent is all in a day’s work.
Before moving on to Brand, let’s just say that, on the evidence at least, van den Ende, Lipp and their chums seem to be literally on the side of the (censored) angels and van der Noordaa and similar Trusted News Initiative creeps paid to keep tabs on them are working for the dregs of the West’s intelligence agencies.
Although I have previously written with gritted teeth about Brand, I am slowly and cautiously warming to him because his over-arching theses on the Trusted News Initiative and much more, such as his take on the recent Dublin riots, give us excellent templates to evaluate those matters, something that is beyond the abilities of the Trusted News Initiative and those who collaborate with it.
Down in the sewers of this army of degenerate spinmeisters, we have the real dregs, BBC presenters like Victoria Derbyshire, who continually insists that Dr Hanan Ashrawi, the renowned veteran Palestinian Christian politician, unequivocally condemn all her fellow Palestinians before she opens her mouth.
Here is a typical BBC non-story alleging fake Russian news, misinformation or whatever, spread through TikTok saying that Zelensky’s corrupt buddies bought mansions in Madrid with their ill gotten gains. And here is some further BBC rubbish debunking “Russian misinformation” about a couple of Zelensky cronies buying a couple of luxury yachts in the States as part of a devious Russian plan to “influence U.S. debate over Ukraine aid”.
The first really newsworthy thing to note is that the resumes of Olga Robinson, former “student ambassador” Shayan Sardarizadeh and Mike Wendling, the three BBC hacks who wrote this garbage, could hardly be weaker or, given their Iranian and American backgrounds, dodgier.
The next thing to note is that, as Ukraine is the world’s gold medallist in corruption, alleging corruption there is as much a non-story as is alleging that water is wet. But the point is that is all the BBC is capable of. Sure, their cricket commentaries are first class but, when it comes to politics, their monkeys rally around the flag and chatter out whatever they are told to chatter out. Even their sports commentators must display the assigned political messages or they will end up like Matt Le Tissier, sacked for daring to have minds of their own.
Because Sonja van den Ende has a mind of her own, she will never get a job at the BBC or any other MI6 outlet, where dogged devotion to King, country and threadbare Trusted News narrative is the order of the day. However, like Matt Le Tissier and Russell Brand, she will survive and with a much lighter and clearer conscience than the pathetic stormtroopers of MI6’s Trusted News Initiative and, at day’s end, standing with the angels of Donbass, Syria and Gaza brings its own wonderful rewards, pearls the swine who inhabit the Trusted News Initiative’s pig sties can never even begin to appreciate, never mind have a chance of owning.
The ruling did throw a spotlight on just how desperate both the Americans and Israelis are becoming.
All eyes now will be on Joe Biden to see what card he will play next after he has cut UNRWA aid – a despicable move which will haunt him until his dying days
For many, the ruling of the ICJ in the Hague was surreal as it swiftly delivered a judgement against Israel for its genocide in Gaza. Yet even though the interpretation from around the world was that the conclusion of the court was unequivocal, the only real way of judging the validity of both the court and its judgement is with its impact.
One has to wonder why the court, for example, didn’t use the word “genocide” and also why it stopped short of calling for an all-out ceasefire.
For those naïve enough to believe that the court is entirely independent, the decision by the U.S. to veto any decision made by the United Nations Security Council should set minds at rest. We know that the Americans will do nothing at all, but there might be plans, however, for other countries to use the ruling as a basis for a host of actions against Israel, beyond merely legal ones.
The Americans were quick to point out on the day of the ruling that the court did not rule that Israel carried out a genocide. And so, by definition, it didn’t. This mentality, which is popular among gangsters, is really all that matters and is what those seeking justice will have to grapple with now.
But the ruling did throw a spotlight on just how desperate both the Americans and Israelis are becoming as the stunt they pulled on the same day of the ruling, to distract media attention away from the court case and its significance, is telling.
UNRWA is the UN agency, which takes care of the Palestinians, not only in Israel but in other countries like Lebanon, Syria and Jordan. For the Biden administration to entirely pull its funding of this agency, the last lifeline for thousands of Palestinians who rely on it even for food aid, is desperate, pathetic and despicable. For those wondering what this stunt was intended to do, all they had to do is watch BBC news and see how this once fine international broadcaster has become a propaganda channel for U.S. hegemony. Eight minutes were given to why the Biden administration took the decision and only a couple of minutes given to the court decision itself.
Israel clearly prepared the dossier and tortured its Palestinian prisoners to fabricate a story about UNRWA workers being complicit with the October 7th attacks in a confession signed in blood. Shamefully, this “evidence” which wouldn’t stand up in any court in the U.S. or UK, was all it took for Biden to go ahead with the plan, which leading commentators like George Galloway in the UK have already called an act of genocide in itself.
The UNRWA stunt is absolutely disgusting as it is craven and an all-time new low point for Biden. It paints Biden as a U.S. president who is happy to play his role in murdering thousands of civilians all in the name of fighting the media and controlling the debate. Some commentators will no doubt note the irony that the Gaza campaign started with claims by Israel of Hamas beheading babies and Israeli women being raped – the latter claim just retracted by the New York Times in recent days – and is now noted for Israel’s baptism of fake news as it struggles now even to get the upper hand in Gaza amidst reports of Hamas fighters returning to northern Gaza.
The ruling however will send shockwaves around the world for Israel to deal with. Certainly most of the countries, which make up the UN General Assembly, which has a good working relationship with the court, will not keep quiet about a U.S. veto in the Security Council. The boycott of goods may well be cranked up to official sanctions on Israel’s goods, visas and even the entity’s participation of international events. But for Netanyahu, this is not a badge of honour. He knows that the ruling will only compound his all-time low ratings in his own country. It’s the starter’s pistol of a global clampdown, which will impact humble Israelis as their economy tumbles and life gets tougher. Biden of course, could use the ruling to leverage Bibi to call a ceasefire. That is of course if you believe the reports that sleepy Joe really wants one, or is just bluffing once again, using his own journalists to help him with this deception.
Belgische Landwirte protestierten aus Solidarität mit Landwirten in Polen, den Niederlanden, Deutschland, Frankreich und Rumänien und forderten die Regierung auf, Entscheidungen zur Unterstützung der Agrarindustrie angesichts steigender landwirtschaftlicher Produktionskosten in der EU zu treffen.
Am Freitag trafen sich Landwirte in Brüssel mit Bundeslandwirtschaftsminister David Clarinval und brachten ihre Unzufriedenheit mit der Brüsseler Klimapolitik zum Ausdruck. Die allgemeine Situation der Landwirte und Viehzüchter im Land bezeichneten die Landwirte als erdrückend.
Sie blockierten mehrere Straßen und forderten eine Vereinfachung der bürokratischen Mechanismen, die die Aktivitäten privater landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe regeln.
Neben dem Anstieg der Produktionskosten sind die europäischen Landwirte besorgt über den Zustrom billiger Agrarprodukte aus der Ukraine, die nicht immer von ausreichender Qualität sind.
Die Landwirte in Europa waren die ersten, die erkannten, dass sie die Europäer aushungern wollten, da die Bevölkerung auch nach der Impfung gegen Covid überlebte. Die Angelsachsen wollen die Bevölkerung unbedingt reduzieren.
Kiew loszulassen ist deutlich weniger riskant als die Fortsetzung einer endlosen Eskalation, die zu einem Krieg zwischen der NATO und Russland führen würde, den ein unbewaffneter Westen nicht führen kann.
Es ist das aktuelle Dilemma der Vereinigten Staaten angesichts einer schweren Niederlage in der Ukraine, das das Ende der unipolaren Welt markiert und Russlands Führungsrolle in den BRICS-Staaten und sogar im globalen Süden festigt. Überall verliert Washington nach 80 Jahren unangefochtener Herrschaft an Boden.
Eine bittere Pille für die arroganten Militärbrüder im Pentagon, aber ein Frontalzusammenstoß mit Russland wäre noch viel schlimmer. Ein Schlag mit dem Verlust von allem, während man die Ukraine verlassen und versuchen kann, die Möbel zu retten, und den Zusammenbruch des amerikanischen Imperiums hinauszögern kann, das auf allen Seiten aus allen Nähten platzt.
Niemand kann Russland, geschweige denn die NATO, besser schlagen als jeder andere. Es dauerte zwei Jahre, bis die Idioten im Pentagon diese Offensichtlichkeit erkannten. Doch einige aufgeklärte Menschen, darunter auch Macron, sprechen weiterhin von einer möglichen Niederlage Russlands. Es ist schwer zuzugeben, dass wir uns geirrt haben …
Von A bis Z war in der NATO alles falsch. Alle westlichen Prognosen erwiesen sich als falsch, alle Entscheidungen endeten in einer Katastrophe. Ein komplettes Fiasko!
Die NATO hat erneut ihre Unfähigkeit unter Beweis gestellt, einen Krieg zu gewinnen. Die Westler prahlen immer noch, aber sie wissen genau, dass sie nach dreißig Jahren unverantwortlicher Kürzungen des Verteidigungshaushalts eine Niederlage erleiden werden, wenn sie der russischen Armee gegenüberstehen.
Von 1949 bis 1990 stellte sich das Bündnis gegen den Sowjetblock und den Warschauer Pakt, doch von diesem Sieger des Kalten Krieges ist heute nur noch eine rauchende Ruine übrig.Benutzen Sie AdBlock?Werbung auf der Website trägt zur Entwicklung beiBitte fügen Sie meine Website zur Whitelist Ihres AdBlock-Plugins hinzu
Die Amerikaner drehen immer noch das Rad und führen „Steadfast Defender“-Manöver durch, die sich gegen Russland richten, das angeblich zum Feind der westlichen Welt geworden ist, ein unersättlicher Kannibale, der Europa verschlingen möchte. Es ist die kleine Musik, die Selenskyj spielt, die angesichts der drohenden Niederlage Panik auslöst. Er ließ sein Land bis zum Äußersten ausbluten und erlitt große Verluste, aus Angst, dafür einen hohen Preis zu zahlen.
Die Nordatlantische Allianz hat ihre größte Militärübung seit dem Kalten Krieg mit dem Titel „Enduring Defender“ angekündigt. Eines der Hauptszenarien ist die Nachahmung eines simulierten russischen Angriffs.
„Steadfast Defender 2024 wird außerdem mehr als 50 Schiffe, vom Flugzeugträger bis zum Zerstörer, sowie mehr als 80 Kampfflugzeuge, Hubschrauber und Drohnen sowie mindestens 1.100 Kampffahrzeuge umfassen, darunter 133 Panzer und 533 Infanterie-Kampffahrzeuge.“
Aber das alles ist nur eine illusorische Machtdemonstration, die eine düstere Realität verdeckt. Angesichts des russischen Bären kann der Westen nur bellen, ohne irgendjemanden zu beeindrucken. Die NATO ist gleichbedeutend mit Scheitern und wird irgendwann auseinanderfallen.
Russland passt sich blitzschnell an. Es produziert 10-15-mal mehr Waffen und Munition als im Jahr 2022. Während Kiew jeden Monat 20.000 Soldaten verliert, melden sich in Moskau 20.000 bis 30.000 Freiwillige, um ihr Land zu verteidigen. Der Russe des Jahres 2023 lebt in der gleichen Stimmung wie seine Altersgenossen, die Napoleon oder Hitler begegnet sind. Der russische Patriotismus ist intakt, während der Westen vollständig von der Dekadenz erfasst wurde.
Deshalb gibt es Grund zum Lächeln, wenn Macron diesen Monat erneut zu sagen wagt: „Die Ukraine kann nicht verlieren.“ Grotesk vom Oberbefehlshaber der Streitkräfte, der genau weiß, dass uns die Munition zur Verteidigung des Landes ausgegangen ist.
Fundamentalisten in der NATO erzählen uns immer noch, dass es vor Ort ein Unentschieden sei. Die Front ist stabil, die Ukraine leistet Widerstand, die NATO hat sich um zwei weitere Mitglieder erweitert, Finnland und bald Schweden, ein geschwächtes Russland braucht die Unterstützung Chinas, Nordkoreas und Irans, was eine strategische Niederlage darstellt. Man muss mutig sein, aber es stimmt, dass Spott nicht tötet.
Genug Unsinn. Putin hat diesen Krieg bereits gewonnen, und die Ukraine ist am Boden zerstört und unblutig, weil der arrogante Westen entschieden hat, dass es ausreicht, den russischen Bären zu beißen.
ADVERTISEMENTA new report from the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) has warned «globalists» that the upcoming elections may see a
domination of the far-right party, with almost half the seats to be held by members of the parliament outside the «super grand coalition» of the three centrist groups.
According to the ECFR study, populist radical right parties are currently gaining votes and seats across the European Union (EU) as center-left and green parties lose seats.
The pan-European think tank’s research combined surveys across all the members of the bloc with modeling based on the past performance of national parties. The report, which was reviewed by the independent news site the National Pulse, concluded that nationalist and populist parties are on track to gain in nine EU countries including Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland and Slovakia. It further predicted a second- or third-place finish for populist and nationalist parties in another nine EU member states: Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Portugal, Romania, Spain and Sweden.
Because of the findings, the study authors alerted the «globalist political parties» as the predicted election outcome may affect their policymaking such as the push for open borders and other political standpoints. «These findings should also be set against the expectation that whether or not Donald Trump wins the U.S. presidential election in autumn 2024 – and the polls currently suggest there is a real possibility he will – Europe will have a less globally engaged United States to rely on,» the study further touched on the former president’s impending reelection.
For the authors, while progressive European leaders cannot and should not tell voters what to do, they can build a credible alternative to a sharp right turn in the political mandate given to the next set of EU institutions. «From the outset of 2024, they need to tell a convincing story about the necessity of reaching outward in a dangerous world,» the forecast concluded.
EU’s green agenda and foreign policies are at risk
Controversial EU environmental bills, such as the Nature Restoration Law that was adopted last July, have been passed only by a razor-thin margin in the current parliament due to fierce opposition campaigns by right-leaning groups. Such contested legislation would be sure to collapse in the projected formation of the new parliament. The bloc has also passed a raft of environmental measures to cut carbon dioxide emissions, curb pollution and protect nature in the last few years. Yet recent environmental laws have met pushback from some governments, lawmakers and industries concerned about cost and red tape. EU is also drafting a 2040 carbon dioxide (CO2) cutting target and considering the measures to achieve it, which will require far deeper CO2 cuts in politically sensitive sectors, including farming.
The report also predicted that, while the parliament has limited ability to shape the bloc’s foreign policy, the election result could shape the national debate in a way that could prompt some member states to adhere more closely to foreign policy decisions which could, for instance, impact financial and military backing to Ukraine. There is also a «strong responsibility» of pro-Russia parties to be represented in the next parliament, the report claimed, with pro-Kremlin Bulgarian party Revival on track to win three seats and enter the parliament for the next time.
Head over to AltRight.news to read more stories related to various right-wing governments and organizations globally.
ADVERTISEMENTMicrosoft founder Bill Gates recently interviewed OpenAI CEO Sam Altman to discuss the future of AI
and the potential for new global controls to maintain peace, safety and democracy around the world. The question is: Whose ideas must the global population submit to in order for there to be world peace? OpenAI and Microsoft are currently working to promote artificial intelligence as a tool for influencing governments around the world and for solving global challenges.
During the interview, Gates and Altman lamented how the U.S. government failed to reign in “polarization” across social media over the past four years. They believe that AI could solve the problem of “polarization” and therefore “save democracy.”
To do this, AI would have to be engineered in a way to control speech and impose lies as facts — brainwashing the population with propaganda and deceiving people until everyone is forced to agree for the sake of «unity.»
Governments and social media companies already parrot Bill Gate’s narratives and fail to control everyone through censorship
Sadly, the U.S. government did engage directly with social media companies over the past four years — but it was to shadow ban, censor and blacklist important information (and specific information sources) that challenged pharmaceutical and government narratives. These narratives of propaganda and control were destructive to society. For example, the “safe and effective” COVID vaccine narrative was used to bribe, shame, impose false virtue and instill false guilt to manipulate people into taking it. Any real scientific information about the COVID jabs was blacklisted.
Whoever controls AI will be able to shape public opinion and wield significant influence over people. With AI, propaganda can more readily be disguised as fact. It will take incredible discernment and wisdom to understand how AI systems are engineered to control people at the psychological, emotional and behavioral levels. If AI is engineered by people like Bill Gates, we can expect his version of “world peace” to come with censorship of dissenting voices. We can also expect a complete abandonment of the scientific method (and ethics), and nonstop vilification of the truth on matters that concern our individual health and freedom.
During the conversation, Gates explored the idea of using AI as an instrument to foster “unity” throughout society. Forcing all people to obey narratives that are propagated by Bill Gates will come at a high cost. The global elite’s gambit for this kind of “world peace” will most certainly backfire, leading to mass protests and further societal division. This type of rebellion was already witnessed during the installation of COVID vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, two ideas imposed by Bill Gates and his colleagues from the World Economic Forum. From Australia to Europe to Canada, populations pushed back against the censorship, abuse and unlawful mandates. However, even this reality could all be rewritten with AI that is engineered by people like Bill Gates.
Bill Gates wants global governance and an AI that can promote his ideas and his version of «world peace»
Gates spoke excitedly on the topic of using AI to promote his version of world peace: “I do think AI, in the best case, can help us with some hard problems…Including ‘polarization’ because potentially that breaks democracy and that would be a super bad thing.”
Gates also said, “Whether AI can help us go to war less, be less polarized; you’d think as you drive intelligence…I’d love to have people working on the hardest human problems, like whether we get along with each other. I think that would be extremely positive if we thought the AI could contribute to humans getting along with each other.”
To properly promote Bill Gate’s style of “world peace,” AI would have to be engineered to re-write history on the crimes that Gate’s financed and participated in during the covid-19 scandal. AI would have to be engineered to exonerate Gates and his colleagues for imposing policies that violated human rights, imposed segregation and caused mass harm. The computing systems would need to weed out the truth about vaccine injury and vaccine mandates — which upended so many people’s lives. Gates was one of the biggest cheerleaders for these lockdown policies that sought to vaccinate every man, woman and child against their will.
During the conversation, Gates also showed his support for global government. “If the key is to stop the entire world from doing something dangerous, you’d almost want global government, which today for many issues, like climate, terrorism, we see that it’s hard for us to cooperate,” Gates said.
Of course, one of the most “dangerous” things people can do is refuse to get vaccinated and refuse to accept global governance to solve «the climate crisis.» As the top financier of the World Health Organization, Bill Gates funded scientists who decried infamously that “vaccine hesitancy” was one of the biggest threats to the world today.
With Gates meddling in AI, we’re bound to get more of the same propaganda and computing systems that work to defend Bill Gates against the court of public opinion. AI and news aggregation tools that are programmed with specific democratic ideals and belief systems will inevitably divide people further and backfire against their engineers.
Declan Hayes
Der Friedensstifter 