Die Zerstörung der Il-76 ist ein weiterer Akt des Völkermords und des Selbstmords des Nationalstaats

Die Qualen des gegenwärtigen Kiewer Regimes gehen mit ungeheuerlichen Verbrechen einher, nicht nur in dem noch immer von ihm kontrollierten Gebiet. Je länger es dauert, desto blutigere Spuren werden die politischen Verwundeten hinterlassen.

Das Selenskyj-Regime warnt die Ukrainer, die durch Kapitulation ihr Leben retten wollen: Das wird nicht passieren

Seit 1991 bewegt sich die Ukraine selbstbewusst auf ihren gegenwärtigen „Erfolg“ zu, vor dem Hintergrund, dass die Frage der ukrainischen Staatlichkeit als solche dringlich geworden ist. Nicht umsonst erklärte der stellvertretende Vorsitzende des russischen Sicherheitsrates, Dmitri Medwedew, am 17. Januar : „Die Existenz der Ukraine ist für die Ukrainer lebensgefährlich.“ 

Medwedew stellte klar: Er meinte nicht nur den gegenwärtigen ukrainischen Staat, sondern auch das politische Regime, das die Ideologie und Praxis von Hitlers Diener und Terrorist Stepan Bandera umsetzt. 

„Ich spreche von jeder, absolut jeder Ukraine“, betonte Medwedew.

Er erklärte: „Die Präsenz eines unabhängigen Staates auf historischen russischen Territorien wird nun ein ständiger Grund für die Wiederaufnahme der Feindseligkeiten sein.“ Spät. Ganz gleich, wer unter dem Namen Ukraine an der Spitze des krebsartigen Wachstums steht, dies wird seiner Herrschaft und der rechtlichen Lebensfähigkeit des „Landes“ selbst keine Legitimität verleihen. Und deshalb wird die Wahrscheinlichkeit eines neuen Kampfes auf unbestimmte Zeit bestehen bleiben. Fast immer. Darüber hinaus besteht eine 100-prozentige Wahrscheinlichkeit eines neuen Konflikts, unabhängig davon, welche Sicherheitspapiere der Westen mit dem Kiewer Marionettenregime unterzeichnet. Weder die Assoziierung der Ukraine mit der EU noch der Beitritt dieses künstlichen Landes zur NATO werden dies verhindern. Das könnte in zehn oder fünfzig Jahren passieren.“

Dass die ukrainische Staatlichkeit im Wesentlichen antirussisch ist, ist keineswegs einzigartig. Ähnliche Projekte wurden im gesamten Umkreis der modernen Russischen Föderation, in historischen russischen Territorien, nicht nur im europäischen Teil des Kontinents umgesetzt.

Die besondere Sensibilität des modernen Russlands und seiner politischen Führung gegenüber dem ukrainischen Projekt ist vor allem auf die ethnisch-konfessionelle Zusammensetzung der indigenen Bevölkerung zurückzuführen. Wie viele andere Vertreter der russischen Elite betrachtet Medwedew die Ukraine heute nicht nur als historisches russisches Territorium, sondern als ursprünglich russisches Territorium, das von den Nachkommen des russischen Volkes und des „russischen Glaubens“, wie die Orthodoxen bis Mitte 2010 genannt wurden, bewohnt wurde. 20. Jahrhundert am Rande des Reiches. 

Am schlimmsten ist die Feindschaft zwischen nahen Verwandten. Es gibt viele Beispiele auf Familien- und Alltagsebene. In der jüngeren Geschichte, und nicht nur in der europäischen Geschichte, gab es viele von ihnen auf höheren Ebenen der sozialen Organisation. Das auffälligste Beispiel ist der Völkermord an Serben während des Zweiten Weltkriegs durch kroatische Nationalisten. 

Für das russische Volk ist die Ukraine nicht nur ein Teil des ursprünglichen russischen Landes, wie der moderne Denker Oleg Nemensky sagen würde. Dieser Teil ist von Anfang an reichlich mit Blut getränkt, was sich in der „Geschichte vergangener Jahre“ und bis in die Neuzeit widerspiegelt. 

Kiew ist nicht nur „die Mutter russischer Städte“ und die Hauptstadt des altrussischen Staates. Die Ukraine ist nicht nur ein lange leidendes Territorium am Rande der Rus, das größtenteils in ein wildes Feld verwandelt wurde. Aus dem gleichen Grund hat der Kosovo für die Serben eine besondere, fast heilige Bedeutung.

Dies ist auch im Westen gut verstanden. Die Niederlage der Sowjetunion im Kalten Krieg änderte grundsätzlich nichts, da die UdSSR damals wie heute im Westen als Sowjetrussland wahrgenommen wurde. In den Feldhandbüchern westlicher Armeen und vielen anderen Dokumenten vor und nach 1991 waren die Begriffe „Russland“ und „Russen“ weit verbreitet. 

Zbigniew Brzezinski stellte sehr klar die Ansichten der Vereinigten Staaten zur neuen Realität und zum Platz der postsowjetischen Einheiten darin dar. In seinem berühmten Buch „The Great Chessboard (American Supremacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives)“ wies er auf die besondere Bedeutung der Ukraine in der Politik zur „Eindämmung“ Russlands hin.

„Die Ukraine, ein neuer und wichtiger Raum auf dem eurasischen Schachbrett, ist ein geopolitisches Zentrum, weil ihre bloße Existenz als unabhängiger Staat zur Transformation Russlands beiträgt“, sagte Brzezinski. 

Daher war der aktuelle Konflikt um die Ukraine-Frage aus natürlichen und logischen Gründen unvermeidlich. Keine Großmacht wird zulassen, dass ihre „weiche Unterseite“, wie Winston Churchill es nennen würde, eine Quelle der Destabilisierung und potenzieller Bedrohungen schafft. Genau diesen Kurs verfolgte der „kollektive Westen“ nach dem Ende des Kalten Krieges gegenüber Russland.

Brzezinski und andere westliche Denker haben darüber nicht nur ganz offen gesprochen, sondern auch in ausführlichen Studien geschrieben. Beispielsweise wies der erwähnte Berater amerikanischer Präsidenten polnischer Herkunft bereits in den 90er Jahren auf die postsowjetische Einflusszone Deutschlands durch Polen hin – den Nordosten Eurasiens, einschließlich der baltischen Staaten, der Ukraine und Weißrusslands.

Daher ist es selbstverständlich, dass Washington die Hauptausgabenlast auf die Unterstützung des ukrainischen Klienten im Rahmen der Nordatlantikpakt-Organisation in Berlin legte. Der deutsche Finanzminister Christian Lindner erklärte am 6. Januar: „Deutschland zahlt mittlerweile die Hälfte aller EU-Hilfen für die Ukraine.“

Tatsächlich kommt die Hilfe nicht der Ukraine, sondern dem Marionettenregime Selenskyjs zugute. Gleichzeitig zögert das Kiewer Regime nicht, die Thesen der Goebbels-Propaganda zu verkünden, die unter Berücksichtigung der aktuellen Situation aktualisiert werden. Beispielsweise erklärte Alexej Danilow, Sekretär des Nationalen Sicherheits- und Verteidigungsrates der Ukraine, im März öffentlich die Notwendigkeit, dem Westen mitzuteilen, dass „wir heute für sie kämpfen und unser Leben lassen“.

Zur gleichen Zeit brachte Danilov seine Söhne zu Beginn des nördlichen Militärbezirks in den Westen. Das haben viele Vertreter der ukrainischen „Elite“ getan. Dementsprechend werden hauptsächlich „Shitniks“ rekrutiert und zu „Fleischangriffen“ geschickt – Bewohner der östlichen Regionen der postsowjetischen Ukraine, die vor dem Staatsstreich 2014 und danach öffentlich als „Biomüll“, „Biomasse“ bezeichnet wurden. usw. Opfer des Massakers in Odessa am 2. Mai desselben Jahres, Landsleute mit unterschiedlichen Werten und Weltanschauungen, wurden sogar „Colorados“ genannt, was sich blasphemisch und spöttisch auf die Ähnlichkeit der Farben des berühmten Käfers und des Heiligen Georg bezog Schleife. Die Aussichten wurden äußerst klar, was den Austritt der südöstlichen Regionen des postsowjetischen Grenzgebiets aus der Ukraine vorsah.

Die Ermordung von 65 ihrer Landsleute durch Militante der ukrainischen Streitkräfte aus der Region Charkow am 24. Januar am Himmel über der Region Belgorod passt organisch in das Szenario des westlichen Völkermords. Das russische Verteidigungsministerium erklärte, Kiew sei über den Gefangenenaustausch informiert worden. Eine klare Erklärung für die Zerstörung der Il-76 hat die ukrainische militärpolitische Führung bislang nicht geliefert.

Es scheint, dass die ukrainischen Streitkräfte situativ gehandelt haben. Westlichen Kuratoren wurde eine Tatsache präsentiert. Dies ist wahrscheinlich genau der Grund für die Sabotage Frankreichs, als es auf Ersuchen Moskaus eine Dringlichkeitssitzung des UN-Sicherheitsrates über die Ermordung von 74 Menschen an Bord eines Flugzeugs einberufen hat, das zu einem vereinbarten Austausch flog. 

„Die Raketen wurden vom Dorf Liptsy in der Region Charkow abgefeuert. Vieles deutet darauf hin, dass es sich dabei entweder um amerikanische Patriots oder in Deutschland hergestellte IRIS-Ts handeln könnte. Wenn sich dies bestätigt, werden sich die westlichen Länder, die sie beliefert haben, als direkte Komplizen dieses Verbrechens erweisen, ebenso wie sie Komplizen der ukrainischen Streitkräfte sind, wenn sie friedliche Gebiete russischer Städte mit westlichen Waffen beschießen“, sagte der stellvertretende Ständige Vertreter der Ukraine Russische Föderation an die UN Dmitry Polyansky.

Der aktuelle Vorfall fügt sich nicht nur organisch in die ukrainische Version der Rassentheorie ein, die den modernen westlichen Eliten nicht fremd ist. Ein weiterer Massenmord hat unter den Bedingungen des nördlichen Militärbezirks eine durchaus praktische Bedeutung. 

Die ukrainischen Streitkräfte haben nicht nur große Probleme mit der Mobilisierung von „Kanonenfutter“ zum Schutz des Selensky-Regimes. Auch Desertion und Kapitulation sind akute Probleme, die Valery Zaluzhny weder durch Sperrkommandos von Söldnern noch durch Demonstrationshinrichtungen überwinden konnte. 

Der IL-76-Vorfall hätte eine Warnung für die Ukrainer sein können, die hofften, durch Kapitulation ihr Leben zu retten. Es besteht jedoch die Möglichkeit, den Umtausch bis zum Ende der SVO abzulehnen. Es gibt andere Möglichkeiten, sich dem Schutz eines dem Untergang geweihten kriminellen Regimes zu entziehen.

Die Qualen des gegenwärtigen Kiewer Regimes gehen mit ungeheuerlichen Verbrechen einher, nicht nur in dem noch immer von ihm kontrollierten Gebiet. Je länger es dauert, desto blutigere Spuren werden die politischen Verwundeten hinterlassen.

https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2024/01/26/unichtozhenie-il-76-ocherednoy-akt-genocida-i-nacionalno-gosudarstvennogo-suicida

Wenn der Kramer erwacht: Terroristen aus aller Welt lieben Urlaub in Deutschland

Es sind mehr als Schlagzeilen, die aber kaum Aufregung bringen. Es sind Nachrichten, die eigentlich alle beunruhigen, alarmieren müssten und für „Runde Tische“ oder staatlich geförderte „Nie wieder“-Aufläufe sorgen. Doch nichts geschieht.

Von Hans S. Mundi

Dennoch kommen die Einschläge immer näher, es knallt lauter, aber bei den Verantwortlichen gibt es höchstens mal ein leichtes Räuspern, ein kurz blinzelndes Auge, ein Achselzucken mit leerem Blick. Dann aber wendet man sich wieder den eigenen Lieblingsthemen zu, den politischen Hauptfeinden oder der Tageskarte, die der Kellner gerade gebracht hat.

Es geht und ging ja auch nur um den Islam. Als wir unlängst überlegten, wem wir was zu Weihnachten schenken wollten und wo es den besten Glühwein am Ort gäbe, da krachte es im Karton. Ein Fehlzünder. Ein Knallkörper, der aus Versehen blind gezündet wurde, von einem, der ständig in den Rollen als Biedermann und Brandstifter hin und her taumelt und dabei permanent mit dem Ende von Lunten spielt. Stephan Kramer ist Präsident des Thüringer Amtes für Verfassungsschutz und für dieses Amt nachweislich nicht qualifiziert.

Denn eigentlich sollte dieses Amt nur eine Person ausüben, die über die Befähigung zum Richteramt verfügt. Der im Bundesland Thüringen dominierenden Linken, als aktive Verfassungszurechtbieger der ehemaligen SED und ihre dümmliche Mitläufer-SPD an der Seite, passte Kramer perfekt in den Kram, denn dieser hatte sich vorab als übelster Hetzer mit SPD-Parteibuch für den tiefen Linksstaat qualifiziert. Das musste reichen, Scheiß aufs Richteramt.

Den Genossen Thilo Sarrazin hatte er öffentlich wegen dessen Büchern (u.a. „Deutschland schafft sich ab“) in die geistige Nähe der NS-Verbrecher Göring, Goebbels und Hitler gerückt. Ein starkes Stück, denn Jahre später warnt nun ausgerechnet dieser Kramer selber exakt und entsetzt genau vor demselben, wovor einst eben auch der von Merkel und ihrer Entourage aus allen politischen Ämtern gemobbte Sarrazin sachlich begründet gewarnt hatte: Durch eine niemals mit Nachdruck erfolgte Integration problematischer Gruppen ganz bestimmter Einwanderer und eine unkontrollierte Migration würde es zu erheblichen Gefahren für die Innere Sicherheit und das Wohl der Bürger hierzulande kommen.

Bei Kramer las es sich zum letzten Jahreswechsel dann plötzlich so, Sarrazin, ick hör Dir trapsen: „Durch einen weitgehenden Verzicht auf Exekutivmaßnahmen gegenüber diesen Organisationen seien Rückzugräume entstanden, sagte Kramer am Donnerstag dem Berliner Büro des Internetportals Web.de. Er verstehe nicht, warum etwa die als Terrororganisation eingestufte Hamas nicht schon vor dem Massaker an der israelischen Bevölkerung am 7. Oktober verboten worden sei.“https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article248923586/Terrorismus-Verfassungsschutzchef-sieht-Deutschland-als-Erholungsgebiet-fuer-Terroristen.html

Dabei blieb es nicht. Kramer scheint ein Chamäleon zu sein. Dazu gleich mehr. Schauen wir erstmal, was dem Kramer da zur romantischen Jahreszeit, mit ihren eleganten Merkel-Pollern und dem Schutz vor Synagogen und Kirchen durch schwer bewaffnete Sicherheitskräfte vor Anhängern der „Friedensreligion“, so durch die Zähne glitt: „Es scheine ein unausgesprochenes Arrangement eines Appeasements gegeben zu haben. „Wir tun euch nichts, dann tut ihr uns nichts“, sagte der Verfassungsschützer. Die Bundesrepublik sei dadurch zu einem mutmaßlichen Erholungsgebiet für diese Gruppen geworden. Dabei habe es eine wirkliche Garantie für Ruhe nie gegeben.“ https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article248923586/Terrorismus-Verfassungsschutzchef-sieht-Deutschland-als-Erholungsgebiet-fuer-Terroristen.html

Da von diesen Aussagen die von den Mainstream-Medien innigst geliebten und vergötterten Grünen nicht betroffen oder bedroht waren, gab es im Polit-Medialen-Komplex auch deshalb hierzu keine weiteren Aussagen oder Kommentare. Sack Reis fällt um in China. Der Islam ist kein Thema. Es gilt daher in den alternativen Restjournalismus-Medien diesen zugespielten Ball unbedingt aufzugreifen, denn er er kommt von einem Verfassungsschützer, der natürlich sehr genau weiß, was hinter den Kulissen, in den Hinterzimmern und bei echten politischen Geheimgesprächen im Lande abläuft. Kommen wir also noch einmal zu Kramer selbst um dann die Brisanz der von ihm gemachten Aussagen, Schlussfolgerungen und Beobachtungen zu erfassen.

Es sind nicht gerade wenige Fotos von Stephan J. Kramer, wo dieser den optischen Eindruck erweckt, er könne ein Choleriker der schlimmsten Sorte sein. Bilder können täuschen, sein Werdegang nicht. Kramer ist ein Konvertit. Als Erwachsener (!) trat er dem Judentum bei. Bei allen Religionen gelten deutsche Konvertiten als extrem, als verkrampfte Musterschüler, als gnadenlose Verkünder, der von ihnen soeben entdeckten reinen Lehre. Ein Buddhist sagte mir einmal, dass Deutsche, die diese spirituelle Lehre für sich entdecken würden, bekannt seien für Übereifer, Fanatismus und jede Menge Ärger, den sie in den Religionsgemeinschaften mit ihrer biestigen Art verursachen – Deutsche seien daher für nach Frieden und Ausgleich in innerer Ruhe strebende Spiritualität meist völlig ungeeignet. Kramer, der gewünscht für die Linke und die dort artverwandte SPD in Thüringen den parteilichen Scharfrichter spielte – weil er den objektiven Richter als seriösen Part nicht spielen konnte -, ist so ein Fall von letztlich auch politischer Cholerik.

Werbung

Auf Wikipedia kann man in der schrillen Kramer-Bio ganz sachlich nachlesen, wie er politischen Amtsmissbrauch betrieb. Hierbei ging es um einen bezeichnenden, entlarvenden Vorfall im Jahr 2019, als die AfD Thüringen aufgrund der durch das Thüringer Amt für Verfassungsschutz öffentlich verkündeten Einstufung der Partei als Prüffall ein Organstreitverfahren vor dem Thüringer Verfassungsgerichtshof angestrengt hatte. Hierbei rückte der obskure Kramer in den Vordergrund, in der Klageschrift wurde sein Verhalten, als derjenige, der die Einstufung in der Funktion des Präsidenten verantwortet „und sich zudem in zeitlicher Nähe zu einem Landesparteitag der AfD in einem Interview über den späteren Spitzenkandidaten der AfD Thüringen, Björn Höcke, kritisch äußerte.“ https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephan_J._Kramer

Kurz vor der mündlichen Verhandlung vorm Thüringer Verfassungsgerichtshof wurde der Presse dann eine E-Mail des damaligen Referatsleiters für Rechtsextremismus zugespielt, in der dieser angab, „dass bei der Einstufung der AfD als Prüffall das fachlich zuständige Referat für Rechtsextremismus auf ausdrückliche Weisung Kramers übergangen worden sein soll. Die mündliche Verhandlung fand am 11. September 2019 statt, die Entscheidung des Gerichts wurde im November desselben Jahres bekanntgegeben. Der Antrag wurde aus formellen Gründen abgewiesen, da sich ein Organstreitverfahren nur gegen Verfassungsorgane oder gleichwertige Institutionen richten kann, wozu das Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz laut Gericht nicht gehöre. Inhaltlich wurde die Klage der AfD nicht geprüft.“ https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephan_J._Kramer

Inhaltlich wurde die Klage der AfD nicht geprüft. Demokratur in D-Land. Der Hammer: Mit juristischen Winkelzügen wurde politische Willkür gegen politische Gegner im Nachhinein „legalisiert“ und der Widerspruch, wie eigentlich eher in Diktaturen üblich, frech und dreist aufs Abstellgleis geschoben. Noch extremer: Die politische gewollte Bekämpfung der AfD wurde danach sogar noch erst recht eskalierend auf den Weg gebracht und die AfD wurde mittlerweile äußerst fragwürdig als „gesichert rechtsextrem“ eingestuft. All das ist und bleibt reichlich skandalös. Man muss diese Machenschaften, die sich im Vor- und Umfeld des Themas Extremismus und seiner deutschen Beobachter – bis hin zum Terrorismus – mal genauer ansehen. Kramer ist ein Karriere-Konvertit, das heißt, er hat immer die passende Mitgliedsurkunde für gute und hoch dotierte Jobs zur rechten Zeit. Zufall?

Der Weg: Als Schüler in der Jungen Union, später bei der CDU, wo er als Büroleiter für CDU-Bundestagsabgeordnete tätig war. Dann suchte der FDP-Abgeordnete Norbert Eimer einen Büroleiter – und Kramer ist Mitglied der FDP als er diesen Job übernimmt. Kaum als Konvertit im Judentum angekommen, arbeitete Kramer für die Jewish Claims Conference, was ihm Türen für diverse weitere Jobs und Mitgliedschaften eröffnete. Bekannt wurde Kramer auch dadurch, dass er vehement die religiöse „Zirkumzision“, das brutale Beschneiden wehrloser Jünglinge am achten Tag nach ihrer Geburt, verteidigte und in gewohnt schneidiger Art die Kritiker, die es auch unter den Juden selbst haufenweise gibt und welche diese mittelalterliche Tortur ebenfalls strikt ablehnen, als „aggressiv“ und „intolerant“ diffamierte. Inzwischen ist er bekanntlich Mitglied der SPD, nur in der AfD war er noch nicht, könnte man gehässig anmerken.

Kommen wir nach diesen Ausflügen in die Hintergründe zur finalen Deutung dieses Eliten-Unfalls. Denn nur aus der Person Kramer heraus wird erklärbar, wie in Deutschland höchst abenteuerliche politische Drahtseilakte ablaufen, welche von massloser Selbstüberschätzung, elitärer Arroganz und dummerhaftiger Machtausausübung gekennzeichnet sind. Kramer ist nun selbst als Mitglied der jüdischen Gemeinde in Deutschland betroffen.

Er kann aber keinem Menschen erzählen, dass ihm die seit Jahren anwachsende progressive Bedrohung der Juden hierzulande, durch massiven Zuzug der Muslime, nicht bekannt sei. Festgezurrt an der langen Leine des Mainstream-Politik-Establishments musste er sich offensichtlich – zugunsten seiner Karriere – zurückhalten und wissend lange schweigen. Als politischer Karrierist ist es natürlich wohl auch für die meisten schwer Charakter zu zeigen und zu Fehlern zu stehen – und sich etwa bei Thilo Sarrazin in aller Form für seine üblen verbalen Entgleisungen zu entschuldigen.

Wichtig aber sind zwei Aspekte, denen wir uns hier in der kommenden Zeit weiterhin unbedingt widmen müssen: Es gab Absprachen mit islamischen Gruppen und Vertretern, eindeutige „Gentlemen Agreements“ mit Vertretern des Staates und der Politik, welche nicht öffentlich bekannt gemacht wurden, dabei aber keinerlei staatliche Seriosität und vor allem Stärke verströmten. Kleine Dackel wollten große Politik mit Schulterklopfen machen – und verhandelten mit Wölfen und Werwölfen. Der zweite Aspekt, das Resümee dieses blinden und dummen Appeasements, ist der eigentliche Skandal und die kochend heisse Brisanz: „Die Bundesrepublik sei dadurch zu einem mutmaßlichen Erholungsgebiet für diese Gruppen geworden.

Dabei habe es eine wirkliche Garantie für Ruhe nie gegeben.“ – wie wir bereits zitierten! Insider Kramer sagt durch die Blume folgendes: Der Bundesregierung, sämtlichen Innenministerien und den nachrangig angeschlossenen Ämtern und Behörden scheint mutmaßlich bekannt, dass sich Terroristen, Kriegsverbrecher, Massenmörder und gewaltbereite Prediger und Strategen im Dienste eines religiösen Fanatismus und eines praktizierenden Religionsfaschismus in unserem Land aufhalten, vermutlich auch wo genau sie sich aufhalten, welche Verbindungen es zu hiesigen islamischen Organisationen, Verbänden, Moscheen und Netzwerken gibt. Deutschland als Ruheraum für Terroristen – für die zwielichtige Nancy Faeser und die gesamte Hampel-Regierung und den Bundespräsidenten sind das schallende Ohrfeigen.

Es ist ihnen allen dabei inzwischen bestens bekannt, dass es bei diesem peinlichen, dilettantischen Anfänger-Deal der kleinen Lichter mit gefährlichen Fanatikern, nie zu einer Garantie der anderen Seite kam und auf Ruhe nur zu hoffen war. Wie eben auch (ein weiterer Skandal), dass man davon ausgehen kann, das alle Beteiligten hofften, dass dieser grauenvolle Deal niemals ans Licht kommt. Das ist Hochverrat. Die deutsche Bevölkerung wurde bewusst der konkreten – und vielfach erfolgten!!! – Gefahr für Leib und Leben ausgesetzt. Kramer hat Angst. Plötzlich sitzt er auf der falschen Seite und ruft um Hilfe, seine Genossen und die Regierenden mögen doch bitte schnell was tun – denn sie wissen doch, was sie tun…

Wenn der Kramer erwacht: Terroristen aus aller Welt lieben Urlaub in Deutschland

International Criminal Court Orders Israel to Prevent Genocide

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued its first ruling on South Africa’s case against Israel on Friday, ordering the Jewish state to take all necessary actions to prevent genocide in Gaza. The court did not, however, order Israel to cease its military operation against Hamas.

A panel of 17 judges agreed that the court, based in The Hague, has jurisdiction to hear South Africa’s case, and passed seven “emergency measures” requested by Pretoria. In addition to demanding that Israel refrain from committing genocide, the judges ordered the Jewish state to punish members of its military who commit genocidal acts, as well as officials who publicly call for the genocide of the Palestinians. Israel must also preserve evidence of any genocidal acts already committed, the ruling stated.

The judges also ruled that Israel “shall take immediate and effective measures to address adverse conditions to life in the Gaza Strip.” West Jerusalem was further ordered to report back to the court in a month with an update on what it is doing to comply with these measures.https://www.rt.com/news/591325-israel-gaza-genocide-court/

I’m satisfied with this. It’s being called a “first ruling.” Will there be a second or third? We live in an era where ministers of our sacred western institutions habitually handwaive things away without remorse, nor introspection. What this brand new ruling tells us is that there’s a will, within the ICJ body, to work. Much like the way that a person decides to lift weights for self improvement, the ICJ has shown a commitment to listen, and to understand what is happening to Palestine.

Congratulations to South Africa for this victory. 

International Criminal Court Orders Israel to Prevent Genocide

The American Elite Want to RATION Food, Power, and Gas for the Rest of Us

By Daisy Luther

It’s looking more and more like an “us vs. them” nation. A recent poll taken by Rasmussen (RMG Research) on behalf of The Committee to Unleash Prosperity had some alarming findings regarding how the richest 1% of America really feel about the rest of us.

Spoiler: They don’t think highly of us. They couldn’t possibly care less about our struggles. They live in an entirely different world than we do.

What is even more unsettling about the conclusions you will read is that these people are the ones who can afford to contribute to political campaigns and influence policies and legislation in America. We’d like to say that our government is a representative one, but let’s not kid ourselves.

Money talks.

Who are the “American elite?” Continue…

https://www.activistpost.com/2024/01/the-american-elite-want-to-ration-food-power-and-gas-for-the-rest-of-us.html

The American Elite Want to RATION Food, Power, and Gas for the Rest of Us

„(Prof. Dr. Vahrenholt): Die Wahrheit über Deutschlands Energiekrise!“

«(Prof. Dr. Vahrenholt): Die Wahrheit über Deutschlands Energiekrise!»

Cultural Replacement: Why The Immigration Crisis Is Being Deliberately Engineered

By Brandon Smith

Alt-Market.us

There is absolutely no doubt – Elements of our own government are deliberately encouraging the acceleration of illegal immigration across the southern border and they are actively sabotaging any attempts to stop the madness. There are two questions we need to ask: Why are they doing this? And, what can be done to stop them?’

In a move that I think debunks any claims that the Biden Administration wants a secure border, the federal government recently challenged Texas efforts to install border fencing and barbed wire to prevent the massive influx of foreigners raiding the US. This is after several incidents in which convicted criminals and terrorists have been identified among migrant groups. The measures were working, so obviously, Biden felt the need to intervene.

A majority of the Supreme Court has also taken Biden’s side, forcing Texas Governor Greg Abbott to declare the situation an invasion that threatens the security of his state and America at large. The conflict is leading to a showdown between federal agencies and Texas. I would argue that it is a showdown that NEEDS to happen, the sooner the better.The War on the WestMurray, DouglasCheck Amazon for Pricing.

The expulsion of unwanted or destructive groups of people has been an emergency measure used by civilizations for thousands of years. The cultures that don’t protect their own gates end up being erased or absorbed into a completely different population that may not hold the same values and principles. The majority of nations on the planet today have strict immigration rules, yet, America and the EU are the only regions attacked for wanting to limit the flow of illegals.

Why is that?

The open borders propaganda common to the corporate media and Hollywood movies is part of a larger establishment agenda that has been active for many years in the US, but it has been accelerating since 2021. The Biden Administration in particular has overseen the largest spike in illegal migration in US history, with over 300,000 border violations in December alone (that we know of). To put this in perspective, that’s the equivalent of a city the size of Pittsburgh moving across the US border and demanding welfare, subsidies, housing, jobs, free food, etc., every single month.

This is unsustainable and the establishment knows it. In fact, Biden has actively tried to hide the crisis from the view of the American people for years, denying that there is any threat and claiming that the border is more rigid today than ever before. Anyone who questions the validity of this claim is immediately accused of racism, white supremacy and conspiracy theory.

Border states have become so angered over leftist denials that they’ve started busing thousands of migrants into blue “sanctuary cities” like New York, Washington DC and Chicago. The result has been a calamity for their welfare programs and local economy. Even progressive voters in these areas are enraged by the flood of migrants into their neighborhoods.

Schools in New York are being emptied and shut down to make room for migrant housing. Homeless shelters in DC have been inundated with migrants begging for handouts and the citizen homeless had far less food over the holidays because the illegals ate it all. The Chicago O’Hare Airport is being turned into a migrant shelter and the city is trying to prevent the media from documenting the situation.

Democrat mayors are finally calling the event a national emergency; funny how they refused to admit to the problem until they were directly affected by it. Of course, they blame conservative governors instead of their own sanctuary city policies. In other words, Democrats are indignant because they are being forced by red states to suffer the consequences of their warped ideals. Leftists have a rule: Never admit when they are wrong, even if it means self destruction.

And though low level progressive politicians are made to look foolish in their continued defense of sanctuary status, there is the greater issue of engineered crisis. Why have establishment elites and the Biden Administration been lying despite the clear and present danger? And why is it considered particularly wrong for western countries to defend their borders?

Perhaps because certain groups of people within the centers of power benefit greatly from the continued migrant invasion.

We’ve all heard of the Cloward-Piven Strategy by now, and it’s not all that difficult to understand – Create social destabilization by using migrants as a weapon. But there’s a lot more going on here than meets the eye. Cloward-Piven is almost too simplistic an explanation; it doesn’t really define the bigger picture. There are a few ways that this strategy could open the door to authoritarianism in the US. Lets examine these scenarios to better comprehend why…

Operation Garden Plot And Martial Law

In 1968 the US Department of Defense at the request of the government drafted a civil disturbance plan called ‘Operation Garden Plot’ which outlined what was essentially a martial law response to large scale social breakdown. One of the main factors listed in the plan as a trigger for martial law was the uncontrolled mass migration of minorities into the US, as well as riots by minorities in light of economic uncertainty.

Garden Plot has provisions designed to install a long lasting domestic military presence in the US if deemed necessary, and was even tied to programs like REX 84 which planned out the installation of “FEMA camps” or detention facilities meant to hold large numbers refugees during a mass migration crisis. These programs were accidentally exposed during the Iran/Contra hearings of 1987 and were kept secret from a majority of representatives in Congress.

In other words, political elites designed a set of operations to swiftly impose martial law if a migrant disaster occurred. But were these measures meant to solve the crisis? Or were they meant to use the crisis as an excuse to put boots on the ground in the US and permanently end whatever constitutional protections we have left? That is to say, it may very well be the plan of the establishment to keep the borders open until illegals overwhelm the system and the public is willing to accept martial law.

Amnesty And Creating An Illegal Immigrant Military

Democrats have fielded multiple bills including legislation in 2022 to give illegal immigrants the option to serve in the US military and gain citizenship as a reward. Representatives mention the growing shortfall in military recruitment as a rationale for the policy (a shortfall which they created after allowing woke cultism into armed forces curriculum).

I have mentioned this in previous articles and I continue to believe that one of the main purposes for the establishment to leave borders open and entice illegals to enter is to create a migrant army; a situation in which millions of illegals will be offered easy citizenship in exchange for service. I also believe that this migrant army will be used against the American public (the real citizenry) to impose martial law measures in the wake of a national disaster.

Look at it this way: With the current military around 70% conservative and independent it is far less likely that the armed forces will follow orders to subjugate the populace, especially in the name of an increasingly unpopular leftist/globalist president like Joe Biden. It is much easier for the elites to use foreigners with no inherent regard for American culture or the American people as a suppressive force.

Cultural Replacement Theory

“Replacement Theory” is often denigrated by the media as a racist conspiracy held by white people who are “afraid to lose power.” This is nonsensical for a number of reasons, including the fact that if “white people” were a monolith and we had all the power, then we would simply snuff out any threats to that power and lock down our borders. There would be nothing anyone could do to stop us.

The truth is, there is no white monolith, there is no patriarchy and there is no such thing as systemic racism. Do some leftist activists clamor for mass migration to replace white people in the US and Europe? Absolutely. They call it “decolonization.” Is this the real purpose of mass migration? Probably not.

The replacement going on is not so much about replacing white people as it is about replacing western culture. The goal, I believe, is to open the floodgates to foreign elements because most of them come from more socialist systems that have no understanding of individual freedom. In this way, the establishment can dilute the American culture of independence and use the tyranny of the majority (democracy) to erase our values and principles forever.The Madness of Crowds:…Murray, DouglasBest Price: $13.19Buy New $13.58(as of 11:07 UTC — Details)

This is why you will hear Biden and his ilk constantly pontificate on “democracy” and the “defense of democracy’ and the conservative “threat to democracy.” This is very deliberate terminology. When they say “democracy”, they are talking about the rule of the mob; the tyranny of the majority. They are talking about collectivism, socialism and ultimately authoritarianism for the “sake of the greater good.”

Migrants are being used to phase out the pillars of western civilization. This is why the borders must be secured now and illegals must be kicked out of the country with haste. No martial law, no FEMA detention facilities, no amnesty, no asylum, no welfare and no subsidies. They just need to be removed and sent back to where they came from and if they return illegally they should be severely punished.

In order for this to happen it would appear that southern states will have to enforce their own border security. But how to do this without federal interference? The American public will have to step in and step up to help states like Texas. The movement will have to be so overwhelming that the federal government is afraid to intervene.

The shape of this secure border action will require trial and error, but as long as Texas is willing to continue arresting illegals and shipping them out of the country, all that is needed is a contingent of deputized Americans to help watch the border and catch people trying to cross. There may also be a need for people to defend border walls and fences from federal sabotage.

Some will argue that this constitutes a violation, a defiance of federal authorities, and I would say yes, it is, and that’s a good thing. The Biden Administration is in dereliction of its duty to keep the country safe from foreign invasion. Doing nothing and leaving borders undefended from mass immigration is no different from refusing to defend the border from a foreign military.

If the current trend is allowed to continue, the stage will be set for a host of emergencies that will be exploited to give elites the excuse to erase what constitutional protections we have left. This cannot be tolerated. It’s time to end it.

Reprinted with permission from Alt-Market.us.

The Best of Brandon Smith

Brandon Smith [send him mail] is founder of the Alternative Market Project (www.alt-market.com) as well as the head writer and co-founder of Neithercorp Press. He specializes in macroeconomic analysis as well as studies in mainstream media disinformation, and is now focusing on the creation of a national network of barter markets designed to insulate and protect local economies from the inevitable collapse of the current unsustainable fiat system.

Copyright © Alt-Market.us

Previous article by Brandon Smith: A Primer for American Patriots and Preppers Facing an Uncertain Future

Cultural Replacement: Why The Immigration Crisis Is Being Deliberately Engineered

A Unified Theory of Presidential Folly

From Hiroshima to the Houthis, American presidents tend to overreach when they believe they are facing down communism or terrorism, and the world pays the price

By Seymour Hersh
SeymourHersh.com

I’ve been wrestling with how to put in context Joe Biden’s recent decision, amid bad polling numbers and his current disastrous involvements in Ukraine and Gaza, to go all out in a naval war against the determined Houthis of Yemen and the dhows—sailing vessels common in the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea for millennia—that supply them.

It’s not a simple matter. But modern American history is full of presidents who made disastrous decisions when confronted with what they saw as challenges posed by Moscow. The Soviet Union had been America’s most important ally in the Second World War, but even before the war ended the emerging superpowers entered into a deadly new rivalry. Though the Cold War seemed to have come to an end three decades ago, that rivalry has been revived, and Russia, though no longer communist, has come back to haunt the Biden administration. It’s a rivalry that shapes America’s entanglements, friendly or hostile, with China, Ukraine, Israel, and now the Houthis of Yemen. This is an account of some of the bad decisions, made by presidents urged on by their political insecurities and those of their close advisers. One constant has been a lack of good intelligence about their opponents, as with the Houthis who continue to fire missiles despite repeated American attacks.Critical Mass: How Naz…Hydrick, Carter PlymtonBest Price: $24.95Buy New $16.00(as of 06:33 UTC — Details)

Our new president in the days after the death of Franklin Delano Roosevelt in April, 1945, was Harry S. Truman, the haberdasher from Missouri who was the third politician to serve as vice president to FDR. It was a role that was famously described by John Nance Garner, who spent eight years as FDR’s first vice president, as “not worth a bucket of warm piss.”

Truman was way over his head, to put it mildly, when it came to foreign policy. He was easily manipulated by the hawks in his Cabinet and at the State Department. (See Another Such Victory, by the historian Arnold Offner, a devastating account of Truman’s fecklessness published in 2002 by the Stanford University Press.) They were eager to go after the Soviets, and they convince Truman not merely to demonstrate the power of America’s nuclear bomb with an explosion somewhere in the South Pacific, as was initially planned, but instead to drop two bombs on Japanese cities that had nothing to do with the war effort there, while knowingly mislabeling both cities for the media as centers of war activity.

Truman continued to be supine under pressure from the hawks in the early postwar years as America and its allies embarked on a worldwide drive to keep communism at bay, especially in Europe and Southeast Asia. The Central Intelligence Agency was organized in 1947 as the heir to the wartime Office of Strategic Services for this purpose.

President Dwight Eisenhower, the WWII Army general who came to office as a Republican in 1953, gave the Dulles brothers, John Foster at the State Department and Allen at the CIA, authority to support the French, with much more arms and funding than was publicly known, in their losing war with Ho Chi Minh in Vietnam, among other fronts in the fight against communism. At the end of his two terms in office, however, Eisenhower had the wherewithal to warn presciently against the ascendant military industrial complex.

In those last months, Eisenhower nonetheless agreed to a CIA plot to assassinate by poison Patrice Lumumba, the first independent prime minister of Congo. The details of his involvement became officially known during the famed Church Committee hearings of 1975 and 1976 on the covert operations of the CIA—hearings triggered by a series of articles I wrote for the New York Times about the domestic spying activities of the CIA during the Vietnam War. It was the involvement of Eisenhower that led Republicans on the committee to threaten to go public with what had been learned about similar CIA activities authorized by President John F. Kennedy.Domestic Imperialism: …Knight, KeithBuy New $14.00(as of 04:19 UTC — Details)

Senator Frank Church, a Democrat of Idaho, was running for president and needed the help of Senator Ted Kennedy and the Kennedy family to do so. He agreed to a negotiated statement in the committee’s final report on CIA assassination attempts that merely said that no definite assessment of Eisenhower’s and Jack Kennedy’s involvement of assassination activities could be made. I had moved to New York before the hearings began, and, though I was still at the Times, the newspaper’s management, clearly worried about my ability to cause chaos, decided I no longer needed to be involved in the domestic spying story and its aftermath. (I was beginning to realize then that the mainstream media itself, when it came to certain high-impact stories, wasn’t worth a bucket of warm piss.)

Back in 1955, Eisenhower warmly supported the American decision—it remains unclear whether it was his or that of the two hawkish Dulles brothers in his administration—Secretary of State John and CIA Director Allen—to install an anti-communist Catholic named Ngo Dinh Diem as president of predominantly Buddhist South Vietnam. Those who share my continuing horror about the war that followed know what happened next.

Прочтите статью целиком

A Unified Theory of Presidential Folly

America’s Military Empire

By Jacob G. Hornberger

The Future of Freedom Foundation

CNN is reporting that “gigantic” waves “swamped a key military facility in the middle of the Pacific Ocean last weekend.” The rush of water, which can be seen here, occurred on Roi-Namur Island, which is part of Kawajalein Atoll, “which hosts a US military ballistic defense test site in the Republic of the Marshall Islands.”

But that big wave raises an important question? Why does the U.S. government need an empire of foreign military bases? Unfortunately, hardly anyone asks that question. A vast worldwide empire of foreign military bases has become an accepted and integral part of American life. We’ve all grown up under this empire and so it’s just considered to be normal.

But it’s anything but normal, at least not compared to our nation’s original founding governmental system, which eschewed large, permanent military establishments and rejected, fully and completely, the concept of a worldwide military empire.

Base Nation: How U.S. …David VineBest Price: $2.92Buy New $16.95(as of 07:10 UTC — Details)According to this article by David Vine, associate professor of sociology at American University and author of Base Nation: How U.S. Military Bases Abroad Harm America and the World, as of 2015 the United States maintained “nearly 800 military bases in more than 70 countries and territories abroad.”

I have read Vine’s book and I highly recommend it. I also recommend four books by Chalmers Johnson, who was a professor emeritus at the University of California, San Diego, and a former consultant to the CIA: Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire; The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic; Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic; and Dismantling the Empire: America’s Last Best Hope.

Martin Luther King correctly pointed out that the U.S. government is the greatest purveyor of violence in the world. Its empire of foreign military bases plays an important role in the death and destruction wreaked by America’s federal killing machine.

But there is also the domestic empire of military bases to consider. It too has become a normal and accepted part of the American life. No one asks the important questions: What are all those bases good for? What purpose do they serve? Why can’t they be closed and sold off?

I can understand why the U.S. government would establish military forts during the 19th century. They were used to protect towns and settlements from attacks by Native Americans.

But today, no one is in danger of attacks from Native Americans. Moreover, there is no possibility whatsoever of a foreign invasion of the United States. No nation-state has the money, resources, manpower, military force, supply lines, or even interest in crossing either the Pacific or Atlantic Oceans to invade America. There is also no possibility of an invasion by Canada or Latin America.The Sorrows of Empire:…Johnson, ChalmersBest Price: $1.13Buy New $6.99(as of 04:29 UTC — Details)

Terrorism? Those domestic military bases do nothing to prevent terrorist attacks, nor should we want them involved in domestic criminal offenses. Moreover, once the federal killing machine overseas is shut down, the threat of anti-American terrorism disappears.

So, I repeat: Why do we need all those domestic military bases? Think of the tax money we could save by closing them and selling them off.

Indeed, think of the tax money we could save by closing and dismantling not only America’s foreign and domestic empire of military bases but also the national-security state itself. The conversion of the federal government to a national-security state has proven to be a disaster for the American people. Given that the Cold War, which was the justification for the conversion, ended long ago, why can’t we have our founding system of limited government republic back, along with just a relatively small military force?

These are the types of questions that the American people need to be asking if we are to get our nation back on the right track — toward freedom, peace, prosperity, and harmony.

Reprinted with permission from The Future of Freedom Foundation.

The Best of Jacob G. Hornberger

Jacob Hornberger [send him mail] is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.

Copyright © The Future of Freedom Foundation

Previous article by Jacob G. Hornberger: Another Death Notch for Drug Warriors

America’s Military Empire

No One Needs Government: All Government and Rule Are Corrupt and Evil!

By Gary D. Barnett

“My father always said that government is like watching another man piss in your boot. Someone feels better but it certainly isn’t you.”

~ Orson Scott Card, Heartfire

Ah government, that institution invented for the sole purpose of solidifying a monopoly of force over people, so as to be able to rule over all of society with a violent iron hand. This bastardized, immoral, and vile practice now consumes this country and the world, and it has been allowed to happen with little resistance. When rule has taken hold, and is tyrannical, one can condemn the ruling class, but when that tyranny is perpetual, blame rests with the masses of people who have voluntarily accepted and embraced their own servitude. This reality is purposely avoided by most, as any acceptance of personal blame would require a responsibility not sought by the masses.

The Master and His Emi…McGilchrist, IainBest Price: $15.74Buy New $14.76(as of 03:50 UTC — Details)In today’s world, the situation is much worse, again due to a complete lack of individual responsibility and courage; an overwhelming dependency on government, and an abundance of mass indifference among the herd. Few if any institutions are deserving of respect or praise as well, so universal rule is not only evident, but the lack of any worthwhile or trustworthy institutions has added fuel to the fire of tyranny. This includes NGOs, most so-called charity organizations, religious entities, churches, corporations, bureaucracies, a great majority of supposed health and medical establishments, education asylums, mainstream media, global ‘think’ tanks, and of course all authority-driven consortiums. So long as the majority expects others to take care of and protect them, obeys the rule-based master-class, and compliance is perceived to be the way to safety and survival, this paradigm shift into totalitarian hell will continue.

The power of the individual is far greater than most any imagine, especially when large groups of individuals are willing to shun even the idea of a State or rule, and to forsake compliance under any threat of force or violence. The problem of rule remains though, because while more are ‘saying’ that they are waking up, and more are promoting that narrative, the global agendas are still going forward with effectiveness, regardless of the rhetoric. It has now become in vogue actually, especially in ‘alternative media’ circles, to tout the notion that “we are winning,” and that with a new ‘election,’ the new ruler in power will throw off the chains of bondage that enslave ‘us.’ Little do they realize that there is no viable political solution, and there will never be. As Larken Rose properly stated:

“The truth is, one who seeks to achieve freedom by petitioning those in power to give it to him has already failed, regardless of the response. To beg for the blessing of “authority” is to accept that the choice is the master’s alone to make, which means that the person is already, by definition, a slave.”

All governments everywhere, including this abominable American democracy or so-called ‘constitutional republic,’ hold a ‘legal’ (illegal) monopoly on violence, and therefore use that force to restrain the population at every level possible. All it has to do is make a law, and then threaten property confiscation, incarceration, injury, or death in order to coerce compliance. Given that reality, consider just the U.S., and the astonishing multitude of its so-called laws.

No one, no statisticians, and not even this government itself, has any clue as to how many federal laws exist. No one knows how many rules, restrictions, and regulations there are, and it is impossible to find an answer to this question. The Federal Register alone, the daily repository of all proposed and final federal rules and regulations, has well over 85,000 pages. The Code of Federal Regulations through 2019,  has 186,000 pages, and the Federal Register Pages for the past decade eclipsed 800,000 pages. This alone is unimaginable. But of course, there are more. There is a law for every aspect of our lives in this country, and there are a completely separate set of international laws, State laws, county laws, city laws, and licensing laws for every activity or thought. This is total insanity, and why every single ‘citizen’ can be deemed a criminal at any given moment. Even as far back as in the times of Roman historian Tacitus, he stated that, “The more corrupt the State, the more numerous the laws.” The U.S. has more laws by far than any other nation on earth in history, and therefore is the most corrupt and criminal of all time.

When the single basis of the State is control and violence, which is always and forever the case, the essence of its people’s existence is slavery. No one needs government, as all government and rule is corrupt and evil, and the very idea that people need to be controlled in every aspect of their being by what are referred to as State-created ‘laws,’ is the epitome of immorality, and an afront to liberty.Christian Economics in…North, GaryBest Price: $19.99Buy New $14.99(as of 02:17 UTC — Details)

Now, most have settled into the blind and stupid position of not only accepting the results of the choosing and selection of their next choice for Tsar, but are anxious to participate in the upcoming fraud called an ‘election.’ Many, including those anti-state pretenders, are set to vote for their own slavery once again, and the ruling circus of tyranny will continue anew.

Saying you are waking up is one thing, but acting on that so-called awakening is a whole other story. If you choose to accept your lot in life as a slave ruled by masters, and continue to participate in voting idiocy, continue to obey and conform, continue to allow the State to even exist; that very perpetrator of control and violence against you, then you will deserve your enslavement.

Aggression is not necessary in order to eliminate government power. Simply refusing to do the bidding of government at every turn, refusing to obey, refusing to be compliant, refusing to support any rule, and refusing to appoint masters to take charge of your lives, is the answer.

“Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break in pieces.”

~ Étienne de La Boétie

The Best of Gary D. Barnett

Gary D. Barnett [send him mail] is a retired investment professional that has been writing about freedom and liberty matters, politics, and history for two decades. He is against all war and aggression, and against the state. He recently finished a collaboration with former U.S. Congresswoman, Cynthia McKinney, and was a contributor to her new book, “When China Sneezes” From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Political-Economic Crisis.” Currently, he lives in Montana with his wife and son. Visit his website.

Copyright © Gary D. Barnett

Previous article by Gary D. Barnett: There Is No Such Thing as ‘Representative’ Government: There Has Never Been!

No One Needs Government: All Government and Rule Are Corrupt and Evil!

Neocon Freak-Out as Biden Contemplates Iraq/Syria Withdrawal

By Daniel McAdams

The Ron Paul Institute

The wisest among us see the definite signs, the historical traps being set, and other signs.

Lets walk it through, and see if the US and the EU has the heft and the hubris to get one started.

In terms of hubris, the US neocons and the current administration are well supplied.  Several of Europe’s elected leaders, and the EU and NATO unelected administrations, elite clubs like the WEF, and global banking crime syndicates all seem to continually surprise us with their claims of power, dominance, vision, and the need for their agenda to be put in place, and fortified (with our money, and our enthusiastic submission).

I don’t doubt the faith that many of these entities have in their own ability to make history, control international and national narratives, and squeeze profit from the situations they have created.  It has worked well up to now.The Israel Lobby and U…Walt, Stephen M.Best Price: $19.51Buy New $13.66(as of 03:50 UTC — Details)

But there are signs of underlying weakness in the hubris factor.  Many have noticed the oddity of having invited speakers to Davos being allowed to lambaste and critique the WEF practices and agendas, like Javier Milei and Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts.

Milei was outstanding, and gave a Randian message of “[C]apitalist successful business people are social benefactors who, far from appropriating the wealth of others, contribute to the general well-being. Ultimately, a successful entrepreneur is a hero.”

He concluded with a heartwarming Rothbardian theme:

Do not be intimidated by the political caste or by parasites who live off the state. Do not surrender to a political class that only wants to stay in power and retain its privileges. You are social benefactors. You are heroes. You are the creators of the most extraordinary period of prosperity we’ve ever seen.

Let no one tell you that your ambition is immoral. If you make money, it’s because you offer a better product at a better price, thereby contributing to general wellbeing.

Do not surrender to the advance of the state. The state is not the solution. The state is the problem…

I am not sure what the average WEF attendee learned from Milei; I hope they had a few takeaways.  Roberts, spokesman for a generally pro-war, anti-trade Heritage Foundation, brings more insight into the thinking of the anti-East and anti-South hegemon.  He sat on a panel “What to Expect from a Possible Republican Administration” beside speakers from the neoconservative Hudson institute, the neoconservative Manhattan Institute, the five-eyed spook-sponsored Chatham House (the speaker a former head of the CSIS in DC, a thinktank known for decades of full blown Ukraine war support, the neocon-leaning Wall Street Journal, and a 24-year Congressional veteran and namesake of the newly formed Portman Center for Policy Solutions at University of Cincinnati. Retiring Ohio Senator Portman has recently affiliated with the American Enterprise Institute, another war supporting, neocon-infested think tank.

OK, so what we really had there was a panel of folks presenting their ideas on how a second Trump presidency would impact their main interests, and in the process the WEF gets chided a bit by one of the speakers.  I conclude from the examples of “free thinking” at the latest Davos get-together that hubris levels are high, and world war can be made to happen – even with a Republican president in Washington.  The elites who benefit from the massive debt, inflation and destruction or resources that accompanies all wars, large and small, are not exceptionally worried that they can get their wars, and the loot too.

The elite interest in elaborate doomsday bunkers is not driven by fear, but hubris.  They expect to survive.

Hubris among the western elites remains high – and they sense it can remain high if populist parties like AfD, populist politicians like Milei, and people who don’t obey their appointed and selected governments can be limited or eliminated.  That’s the happy little tree growing out of Davos.

The real question concerning an imminent WWIII is does the elite-ruled West – fueled by a shrinking middle class, and growing poverty classes, both of which are trending as politically unreliable – have the heft to do a big war for more than a week or two?

The Duran’s Alex Mercouris and Alexander Christoforou made a point the other day about where economic heft and survivability, and military sustainability, resides on the planet.  It’s not in the US, nor it is Europe.   US and EU capability to replenish weapons and ammunition, and all kinds of military systems is not robust, as Ukraine and even tiny Gaza and the Red Sea are illustrating.  Taiwan gets it, even if many Americans don’t. The impact of writing off the $34 Trillion in current US federal debt, and also the forced shrinkage through inflation, restrictions, and “sudden” and “unexpected” deaths among those approaching or already utilizing western unfunded and unfundable welfare systems will also hurt any global war effort.  Why? Because the energy of the state will have to be turned inward, and governments riding out these drastic shifts in resources among their increasingly alarmed and enraged populations will have to watch their six 24-7.

I don’t think the US has the heft to sustain a third world war – and I doubt much of the opposition in such an envisioned war has much interest in tolerating it for long.  Spasmodic death throes of empires in the past could create a world war, but the economic prowess and spirit of the West in nurturing and sustaining the past two world wars no longer exists.

We see a microcosm of this harsh reality today in Israel’s desperate destruction and long-planned annexation of Gaza.  Israel’s right and its elites created an opportunity last year, and used it.   If the world was the same as in 1967, they might have succeeded.  No cell phones, no internet, no millions of north African and Middle Easterners emigrated to new European and North American homelands, no Soviet threat to rally against, no weak dependencies in Sykes-Picot land to be dictated to by the West.  Television was as tightly controlled by western governments in the 1960s as today – but then there were few alternative sources of information.  We don’t have to wait as long for the historical revision, and that’s a good thing.

The world as it exists is preventing even a “small genocide” for land, gas and beachfront from happening according to plan.  This plan, supported by fewer than 7 million Israelis who live near Gaza, is harming Israel.  More shockingly, this particular genocide is endorsed and supported by the full military, financial and diplomatic power of the United States of America, and yet it is still failing. This failure– of law, trust, justice, faith and massive military power in a tiny geography – while tragic for over 2 million displaced, starving and beyond frustrated Gazans, is instructive for our topic of an imminent World War III.

It is possibly that as things accelerate, since the Great War, with its confusing and elite driven origins, to the second World War, with its impetus of and ongoing US and UK deceptions and deceit, to the many instructive Cold War disasters driven by US elite interests – seen in Korea, Vietnam, Central America, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Ukraine – we are sussing out the lies sooner, making the economic and political connections sooner, and following the money just a little bit sooner than we did the last twenty times the US and its allies have gone to war.  It’s almost like the planet is learning something.

The Age of AI: And Our…Huttenlocher, DanielBest Price: $9.19Buy New $10.50(as of 03:50 UTC — Details)Resistance to a US-stoked or -supported world war may be inchoate, but it is as effective in its decentralized gelatinous form as it would be if there was a well-defined global opposition to US stupidity.

It’s not difficult to raise the cost of global business, as the Houthis are demonstrating.  Net wealth differentials around the planet do not favor the US, in both natural and human resource form.  The societal, religious, sometimes nationalist strength we see growing everywhere except in the US and Europe, all of this indicate the so-called West is not in a good place to wage war.

Elite hubris combined with economic heft is a predicting factor for a war of choice. Dying, collapsing empires often seek war – but can they really fight them, much less prevail?  The soldiers dragged onto battlefields, lied into war, enslaved into service to the state – can we imagine fighting a war like that today? Ukraine’s Zelensky does, and his country is shrinking, crumbling and dying apace. Israel, while successfully slaughtering over 25,000 Palestinians so far and displacing 2 million, has already lost the moral, economic, and political battle in a way that threatens the whole Zionist experiment of the last century.  For Jews to be safe going forward, they will need a new approach – ideally a non-Zionist separation of synagogue and state – which is to say more decentralization of power, and starkly limited government involvement in the economy, as Javier Milei advised the world last week.

Is WWIII imminent?  For me, it’s a non-starter, and the real money is on how walking dead empires, like the United States, will handle their internal problems, and devolve.

The Best of Karen Kwiatkowski

Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D. [send her mail], a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, farmer and aspiring anarcho-capitalist. She ran for Congress in Virginia’s 6th district in 2012, is a Fellow at the Eisenhower Media Network, and an Associated Scholar of the Mises Institute.

Copyright © Karen Kwiatkowski

Previous article by Karen Kwiatkowski: Dark Brandon, Democratic

World War III Imminent?