Russia’s targeting of French-speaking personnel suggests that advisers from NATO countries operating in Ukraine have been put on notice, former US Marine and UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter has said.
According to the Russian Defense Ministry, more than 60 “foreign fighters” were killed and another 20 wounded in Tuesday’s high-precision strike on a building in Kharkov.
Speaking with Sputnik on Thursday, Ritter pointed to the possibility that at least some of the French-speaking individuals may have been active-duty French military, “who were in Ukraine at the behest of their government, and now they’re dead.”
“I think this shows a new mindset for the Russians,” he said. “In the past, Russia has not shown any hesitancy to eliminate foreign mercenaries fighting on behalf of the Ukrainian military. But there has seemed to be some sort of leniency towards military advisers or personnel who belong to NATO countries who are in Ukraine.”
If the fighters killed weren’t simply mercenaries but serving French military professionals, “this shows that Russia has made a decision that everybody in Ukraine now is fair game,” Ritter added.
He suggested that this might mean Russia is moving to the “end of the game” in Ukraine, in which it will make no distinction between the Ukrainian soldiers, foreign mercenaries, or members of NATO militaries operating on Ukrainian soil.
The Ukrainian side has given conflicting accounts of Tuesday’s strike, first saying the missiles hit an unused hospital and then that a residential building was struck causing civilian casualties.
Donbass Insider Editor-in-chief Christelle Neant told RT on Thursday that “many wounded French-speaking individuals were admitted to hospitals” in Kharkov, according to Ukrainian intelligence sources.
Neant said that Kiev uses foreign mercenaries “primarily for media purposes” and that the Frenchmen in Kharkov may have been instructors teaching the Ukrainians how to handle weapons provided by the West.
Earl Rasmussen of the Eurasia Center told RT that the Kharkov strike might be a message to Ukraine that Russia won’t treat Western fighters any differently than Ukrainian ones. He also allowed for the possibility the stricken foreigners may have been instructors.
Thousands of fighters from the West flocked to Ukraine after the conflict with Russia escalated in February 2022, but their enthusiasm dropped off after up to 180 of them died in a missile strike on base in Yavorov in mid-March. Since then, almost 6,000 of the 13,500 foreigners who came to fight for Ukraine have been killed, and over 5,600 have returned home, the Russian Defense Ministry said earlier this month.
Ansarallah’s intervention in solidarity with the martyred Palestinian people marked a turning point in the Israeli war of aggression in Gaza.
Ansarallah’s intervention in solidarity with the martyred Palestinian people marked a turning point in the Israeli war of aggression in Gaza. Certainly articulated with the Axis of Resistance, it forced the United States to become directly involved militarily in the conflict, more in aid of international commercial monopolies than in the administration of Benjamin Netanyahu (this will be the first pawn to fall, without any protest from Washington).
But the Americans, who, with the exception of the powerful arms industry, do not want a full-blown war, responded very timidly, attacking only selected targets in Yemen. Ansarallah said that no important infrastructure was hit and that the attacks did not even tickle its military potential. Therefore, it will continue to intercept ships going to or returning from Israel passing through the Bab al-Mandab Strait.
Joe Biden violated American laws by authorizing a military attack without consulting Congress, repeating what Donald Trump did when bombing Syria in 2017. But at that time Syria was defenseless, destroyed and in an internal war, while its ally Russia had not yet as much friction with Trump as there is with Biden. Now it’s different for the U.S.: the Arabs are on the offensive, not on the defensive. And Russia really wants Biden to sink into the mud.
At the same time, Iran seized a U.S. oil tanker in the Sea of Oman in retaliation for the U.S.’s earlier confiscation of a ship it owned. It is clear that it was a politically designed measure.
For now, everyone is testing their opponent. The assassination of leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah and the Iraqi resistance by Israel and the U.S., as well as the terrorist attack claimed by the Islamic State and redolent of Mossad and the CIA, were risky tests against the Iranians. They increased the feeling of revenge on the part of Tehran and its allies.
The U.S. and Iran (in constant communication with Russia and China) are in an increasingly tense chess game right now. In the final months of 2023, several troops were deployed to Iran’s borders with its neighbors. This week, missiles were launched against targets in the regions of Iraq and Syria occupied militarily by the U.S., and also against Pakistan, which hit terrorist groups accused of being responsible for recent attacks in Persian territory.
These attacks by Iran had extremely negative repercussions for Tehran. The governments of Iraq and Pakistan have harshly condemned them and the international press has already increased the anti-Iranian propaganda — which has been growing in recent weeks — even further. Iran obviously considered all of this before taking these unprecedented actions. To risk losing many points with key allies, Tehran certainly imagined it would be worth it, as this was a show of strength to the U.S. and Israel. In fact, terrorist targets are nothing more than an excuse for Iran: the real target was the Pentagon. The Iranians have shown that they are not afraid to burn down the entire region if their enemies really want a war.
Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Ashtiani, Iran’s Defense Minister, made this clear: “We see no limitations in defending our national interests and the people, and will certainly do this authoritatively. No matter where threats against the Islamic Republic come from, we will react and the response will surely be proportionate, decisive and strong.” Repeating: “no matter where threats against the Islamic Republic come from”…
There are increasing signs that the war in Gaza will spread across the Middle East. Israel has apparently reduced operations in northern Gaza, which may suggest that the Zionists are redirecting resources to other fronts — such as the Lebanese, where friction with Hezbollah is only increasing. In Israel, it is admitted that it would be almost impossible for displaced people to return to their homes in the north of the country without Hezbollah being forced to retreat. An article in Haaretz is scathing: “a war with Hezbollah is inevitable.” Its author, Chuck Freilich, a former deputy national security adviser in Tel Aviv, warns that “there is a clear danger of a direct conflict between Israel and Iran and from there to a broader regional conflagration.” The Guardian has the same fears about the U.S. and its British allies.
The U.S., in turn, suspended arms supplies to Ukraine, perhaps to focus on the Middle East, as it is unable to sustain two such difficult fronts at the same time (and this is a confession that Russia has already won the war in Eastern Europe). The U.S. also started importing oil from Venezuela again, perhaps anticipating the impossibility of doing so from the Arabs due to a war.
Following the attacks suffered by the U.S.-UK coalition, the Ansarallah supreme political council issued a statement warning that “all American and British interests are now legitimate targets of Houthi forces.” More than 20 American military bases are within the range of Yemeni missiles, from those in Djibouti to those in Israel, including those in Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Jordan and all the countries of the Arabian Peninsula.
There are already more than 130 attacks against U.S. bases in Iraq and Syria, and they occur daily. If the U.S. does not respond in kind, the Iraqi resistance forces will become even more excited. And they are very popular, leading the Iraqi government to publicly declare that it will withdraw imperialist coalition forces from its territory — so as not to be left behind and swallowed up by the popular movement that supports armed resistance.
The great popularity of the entire Axis of Resistance is proven by A+B through numerous opinion polls published in recent months and weeks, which reflect broad support for Hamas and Hezbollah not only among the Palestinians and Lebanese, but throughout the Arab world. This popular support (in addition, of course, to the continuation of the genocide in Gaza) is a decisive impetus for a major offensive against the Zionist and imperialist enemy.
Everyone also knows that the West Bank is “on the verge of explosion”, as many newspapers say. Terrorist attacks themselves are increasingly worrying the Israeli army and police. Because they are unable to fight against such powerful forces on so many fronts — war spending and the Houthi economic blockade are leading Israel’s economy to collapse and Gaza is already quicksand for Israeli soldiers. Therefore, the U.S. would be absolutely obliged to come to Israel’s aid. For the U.S., if Israel falls, the fall of its world domination is certain and almost imminent.
Fewer and fewer boats sail through the Red Sea. More than a fear of intervention by Yemeni revolutionaries, it is a fear of being swallowed up by a real war in the region. News agencies say Germany and Denmark could send their warships there in the coming days. The Red Sea crisis could lead to a reduction in global GDP, according to a new report from the World Bank. This would likely not occur if the crisis ended quickly, but only if it continued, suggesting an escalation and possibly fatal explosion.
All we can do so far is speculate based on the news published by the international press. But the movements indicate that the drums of war are about to beat.
The world has reached a point of no return. The fraud of Western powers is spectacularly exposed and has become untenable.
Whatever moral authority or superiority Western states may have presumed to have had in the past, all that is now shredded – irreparably.
The hypocrisy and duplicity of the United States and its Western allies have been perceived for many years, indeed centuries. There is nothing new in that. But what is new now is how glaringly obvious to the world the fraudulent pretense has become. Global consciousness is, in turn, leading to global contempt.
There is, too, an unmistakable sense that Western leaders have become aware of their charade having been rumbled and of their imminent downfall.
This week saw British government ministers issuing desperate scaremongering warnings about global threats as a way to rally public support for their vanishing authority. In doing so, they just sound laughable.
Elsewhere this week, France’s President Emmanuel Macron delivered a bizarre nationwide address pleading for national unity amid global chaos. Macron sounded pathetic as if begging to be given respect.
The irony is that the threats and chaos that these political charlatans adduce are largely the result of Western lawlessness, as evidenced by their de facto support for the genocide in Gaza and the relentless funding of a Neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine to provoke Russia. For decades, the Western powers have gotten away with mass murder, illegal wars, and global vandalism. The difference now is that a convergence of crises has exposed their malevolence and machinations.
The slaughter in Gaza has exceeded 100 days and the death toll is approaching 30,000. It is the most transparent genocide in history, as Richard Falk deplores. And, what is more, the United States and its European allies are fully complicit in the shocking crimes committed by the Israeli regime.
Hospitals are shelled by the Israelis, medics and journalists are murdered, as are hungry people running to occasional food aid trucks. Unicef calls it a “war on children”. Up to 800,000 people in Gaza are reportedly facing starvation, and yet the arrogant Western powers do nothing to stop this annihilation nor even condemn it.
The complacency and smugness of Western political leaders like U.S. President Joe Biden and his Secretary of State Antony Blinken are nauseating. The United States as well as the European Union are enabling and arming the Israeli regime with no restraint.
Indeed, when South Africa presented its charges of genocide against Israel at the United Nations International Court of Justice at the Hague last week, it was apparent to the world that the U.S., Britain, and other European powers were de facto in the dock as well over their complicity.
Washington, London, and Brussels have pointedly refused to demand a ceasefire in Gaza under the guise of cynical excuses that recycle odious Israeli propaganda lies, such as the Palestinian militant group Hamas allegedly using human shields or hospitals as bases.
Yet these Western powers turn around and suddenly bomb Yemen, the poorest country in the Arab region because it has taken the principled action of blocking Red Sea shipping as a leverage point to force a ceasefire in Gaza. The Yemenis are invoking their right under the 1948 Genocide Convention to act in solidarity to prevent the genocide of Palestinian people.
Thus the Western powers are not only arming, enabling, and justifying the Israeli crimes in Gaza. When another party, Yemen, takes action to help the Palestinians, the Western powers double down on their criminality by assaulting Yemen.
The Red Sea shipping crisis could be easily averted by calling a ceasefire in Gaza, as the Yemenis are contending. So, why don’t the Western powers comply? The conclusion is that they are unwilling to stop the genocide in Gaza. The Israeli regime is a bastion of U.S. and Western imperialism in the geo-strategically important Middle East. It is effectively mandated to get away with murder as it has done for decades since its inception in 1948 under the auspices of American and British neocolonial chicanery.
Let’s be clear. The U.S. and its British attack dog have no legal right to launch strikes on Yemen, as Scott Ritter explains. What these Western powers are committing is criminal aggression against a country where over half of the population of 33 million is reliant on food aid. The deprivation in Yemen is a direct result of the U.S., Britain, and France’s bombing of that country, along with their clients Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, from 2015 to 2022 in an attempt to oust the Ansar Allah government.
The depravity of the United States and its Western Neo-imperialist partners is plain to see. The presumed moral authority they proclaim is bankrupt. These powers are nothing but lawless rogue states whose much-vaunted “rules-based global order” is an audacious cover for their unilateral barbarity and banditry to ransack the rest of the world.
Blinken, the U.S. top diplomat, was in Davos this week for the annual Western elite summit. That gathering is now a parody of pretenses. Blinken was pontificating about Gaza and how the suffering “breaks his heart”. Listening to this narcissistic non-entity is an affront to moral decency and common intelligence.
His British counterpart, Lord [sic] David Cameron, was also at the Swiss Alpine resort holding forth about international law and security. Cameron even had the brainless temerity to claim that the current global situation was reminiscent of the 1930s by comparing Russian President Vladimir Putin to Adolf Hitler and Russia to Nazi Germany. Cameron has got history upside down. The correct comparison is Western powers to Nazi fascism.
The Americans, British, and other Europeans are fueling genocide in Gaza while bombing Yemen and sponsoring a Neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine that openly venerates World War Two collaborators of the Third Reich like Roman Shukevych and Stepan Bandera.
Also attending the Davos mountaintop circus was Ukrainian puppet president Vladimir Zelensky who was, as usual, begging for billions more in financial and military aid. That U.S.-led proxy war against Russia has caused the deaths of 500,000 Ukrainian soldiers and up to $200 billion in wasted Western taxpayer money. Ukrainian pensioners, women, and disabled people are now being dragged off the streets to join the slaughter facilitated by the Western-sponsored Kiev regime.
The massive crimes in Gaza, Yemen, and Ukraine are an integral part of the Western “rules-based order”. It is an object lesson of the same root cause. That is, the Western imperialist system, headed by the United States.
The world has reached a point of no return. The fraud of Western powers is spectacularly exposed and has become untenable. The Western imperial facade is imploding from its inherent corruption. It is a perilous time but the harsh truth can set the world free of hegemony and the systemic violence of Western elitist power.
Ukraine has made Europe a pathetic American wasteland, of no great consequence in the larger picture and all with an economy of American lives.
Although they say you should never judge a book by its cover, that does not apply to “Proposed Plan for Victory in Ukraine”, a policy paper the U.S. Republican Party hawks recently wrote on how NATO can prevail in Ukraine. As its cover has a picture of Russia’s Putin, together with China’s Xi and Iran’s Khamenei, with Belarus’s Lukashenko towering behind them, those Americans are in no doubt who their many enemies are, just as we, in our turn, can be confident that, in extrapolating their “analysis” far beyond Zelensky’s imploding rump Reich, we are reflecting their bird brain’s view of the world.
The plan, which should have been written with a crayon into a colouring book, divides into four or so parts, headlined as follows: The Threat, Proposed Plan for Victory, Oversight, Burden Sharing. Those sections, in a nutshell, tell us that Putin and all those others, who are not NATO doormats, are a clear and present threat to our democratic way of life; that we should blast the lot of them into the hereafter, having first used our NGOs to undermine their respective civil societies; that we need the same robust accounting and government systems Zelensky has in Ukraine (LOL); and, finally, that “our democratic partners” should cough up more cash to keep our war machine well-oiled.
Although NATO’s three major arenas of Europe, the Middle East and Southern/Eastern Asia may have different characteristics, the overall approach of sending in the marines or, better still, someone else’s marines, is the same. NATO is, militarily, a compulsive gambler that keeps doubling up, hoping its luck will turn.
With all of that in mind, let’s again briefly survey the state of play from Finland down to the Middle East and onwards to China and beyond.
Regarding Finland, Sweden and the Arctic, Russia should make those pimple states aware that, should they escalate affairs around the Kola peninsula, Russia can also escalate up to and including nuclear war against them and, that, if they really escalate, both Finland and Sweden will be nuclear wastelands for the next 100,000 years. Given their carry on, the world might be better off without these American doormats.
Ukraine, meanwhile, has worked out well. It has made Europe a pathetic American wasteland, of no great consequence in the larger picture and all with an economy of American lives.
Azerbaijan’s slaughter of the Armenians, helped at every stage by the Turks and their Muslim Brotherhood enforcers, shows the value of heavily investing in drones and missiles and other asymmetric weapons. Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthi have all driven home this same point, that, as with Ukraine, drones and missiles are the new kings of the battlefield. NATO are, as these links here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here all show, also fully aware of this and, having duked it out against Iranian drones in Ukraine, it is onwards Christian soldiers to Asia.
As India squares up to China, all sides agree that drones and missiles will both play significant roles in their respective calculi. With Mohamed Muizzu heading a Chinese puppet regime in the Maldives to the south, and Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and especially Pakistan being seduced by China to India’s north, India must calibrate its response as part of its Neighborhood First policy. If the Maldives’ “India Out” regime does not quickly see the light and abandon China, then India, together with its Israeli, American and Australian partners, might well invade that tropical paradise “to preserve democracy”. Certainly, China cannot be allowed to control the Maldives and the choke points around them and, as India cannot match China’s spending power, tough love in the form of a full scale naval invasion might be the preferred option.
On that latter point, it might be noted that India’s blue water navy, along with Japan’s, sent help to the Maldives during the 2004 Asian tsunami but China proved itself incapable of doing the same. An important point to footnote when the big guns open fire.
Although America’s only reservation with regard to India flexing its military muscles would be how to balance India’s sectarian Hindutva ideology with getting NATO’s Uyghur fifth columnists to stir the sectarian pot in China’s vast Xinjiang province, I am confident Turkey’s Erdoğan and his Qatari Muslim Brotherhood backers will be up to the challenge helped, no doubt, by the mastery Turkey and President Ilham Aliyev’s fascist Azerbaijan have both shown in drone warfare in their latest efforts to exterminate the Armenians.
Although China and Pakistan have larger drone inventories, India, helped by Israel and the United States, hopes to close that gap not only against them but also in India’s ongoing campaign against the Houthi and sundry other weathervanes currently making the news.
India has also been investing heavily in Russia’s Far East, even in Sakhalin, which is in dispute with Japan, whose diplomacy has always tended to grovel to one great power (Britain, Nazi Germany, the United States) after another, rather than to follow Japan’s own national interests.
Although India hopes to avail of Russia’s emerging Northern Sea Route (NSR), that might well become redundant when NATO puts the squeeze on China: no international trade, no need for extra trade routes or, for that matter, China, which is far more export reliant than is India, which has a much younger demographic (with two-thirds of Indians being under 35 years of age) and bullish growth prospects, some of which is as a result of multinational companies divesting themselves from revanchist China, whose mercantilist and neomercantalist adventurism is not everyone’s cup of tea.
And though we only recently discussed China’s South Sea and Taiwanese adventurism at length, the Yanks are building yet another air base in Okinawa and the Philippines are very concerned with the vast oil supplies the Yanks continue to stockpile in Subic Bay, where they have no right to be. Although the good people of the Philippines want the Yanks gone, because they do not want the Chinese to further encroach upon them, like Japan, Vietnam and the entire ASEAN bloc, they are forced to collude with the usual suspects to put an end to this creeping Chinese colonialism.
And then there is Malaysia. Or rather Malaysia’s Proton car company which I wrote about in Japan’s Big Bang when Mitsubishi Motors were heavily involved in it. Mitsubishi’s problem was that it had been left behind when other Japanese auto companies scooped up the rest of SouthEast Asia and so it invested in Proton, trying to make a cheaper version of its own domestic Japanese offerings that would better fit the budgets of the Malaysian and contiguous consumer markets. Leaving the cost cuttings to one side, Mitsubishi could not make it work and it is unlikely the Chinese will enjoy any greater success simply because the Malaysian GDP/cap of $12,466 does not offer sufficient upside to make Chinese style projects such as this viable.
Although that can be debated in the case of Malaysia and Proton, what cannot be debated is that China has a number of glass jaws that would give any boxer a heart attack. Disrupt sea trade, disrupt exports with sanctions, disrupt Hong Kong, Tibet, Taiwan, Xinjiang, the Indian border and a few other places for good measure and China will squeal.
China sees itself as the new Rome, with all roads leading to and from it. But Rome, on which the Americans model themselves, was an imperialist power, whose hour has passed. Although the Chinese have pumped billions into such projects as the Phnom Penh-Sihanoukville expressway, not all of these gimmicks have stood the test of time that Rome’s roads or, for that matter, Herr Hitler’s autobahns have. Malaysia, for example, has lost $2bn to Chinese companies who built two useless pipelines in Sabah and that is but one of many such white elephant examples.
The harsh reality is that much of China’s investment is, like that of bubble era Japan before it, shifting domestic overcapacity overseas with the same sorts of results Mitsubishi got with Proton. Although China’s state and private investment into SouthEast Asia has been impressive, outside of the Chinese hype, results have been as mixed as were those of bubble era Japan.
And that is before we look at the grimier externalities. President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos of the Philippines would like to put an end to inward Chinese racketeering and Malaysia is still trying to get over the Belt and Road criminality for which former prime minister Najib Razak got handed a 12 year jail sentence (we’ll pass over his murder of Mongolian model Shaariibuugiin Altantuyaa). Further south, the Indonesians feel their $7.3bn Whoosh high-speed train was a very expensive white elephant, one of many China has peppered the entire region with.
For many in Southeast Asia, Japan whose foreign direct investment in the region ($200 bn) lags only behind America’s ($210 bn) and is almost double that of China’s ($106 bn), might be the better bet, at least as a hedge against the two bullying hegemons of America and China. Although Chinese trade with ASEAN now far outstrips that of Japan, Japan remains the steadier bet, all the more so if Taiwan and South Korea are also put on their side of the scales.
More to the point perhaps, Japan has not only concluded defence-equipment transfer agreements with the Philippines, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, Singapore and Indonesia; but, as this Japanese Defence Ministry document shows, the Japanese military have a good idea of what they have to contend with regarding China’s antics.
As the Chinese like to gamble, they might like to consider that NATO figures the odds of NATO bottling them up and torpedoing their economy are quite good. If China doesn’t want to shorten those odds even further it should, as already suggested, retain the services of Russia’s diplomatic corps to learn how to constructively play their part. If, on the other hand, they continue on this road to war and destroy all the progress they made since getting shot of Mao and his equally reactionary Gang of Four, then all bets are off and NATO’s Proposed Plan for Victory in Ukraine, Yemen, Iran, Syria & China will, sadly, have its day.
19. Januar 2024 um 16:45Ein Artikel von: Redaktion
Hier finden Sie einen Überblick über interessante Beiträge aus anderen Medien und Veröffentlichungen. Wenn Sie auf “weiterlesen” klicken, öffnet sich das Angebot und Sie können sich aussuchen, was Sie lesen wollen. (AT)
Wir weisen darauf hin, dass die jeweiligen Anbieter für die Barrierefreiheit ihrer Angebote selbst verantwortlich sind und es durchaus sein kann, dass der Zugang von zunächst freien Inhalten nach einer Zeit beschränkt wird.
Hier die Übersicht; Sie können mit einem Klick aufrufen, was Sie interessiert:
Bundestag beschließt Gesetz für schnellere Abschiebungen Die Abschiebung abgelehnter Asylbewerber vereinfachen: Das ist das Ziel eines neuen Gesetzes, das der Bundestag am Donnerstagabend beschlossen hat. Gegenstimmen kamen aus der Opposition – und von Abgeordneten der Ampel-Parteien. Der Bundestag hat am Donnerstagabend für mehr und schnellere Abschiebungen von abgelehnten Asylbewerbern gestimmt. Mit Stimmen aus der Ampel-Koalition beschloss das Parlament den Gesetzentwurf von Bundesinnenministerin Nancy Faeser (SPD). Quelle: BR24dazu: Auch die Ampel plant »Remigration« Indem die Regierung die Armut erhöht und den Abschiebeapparat ausbaut, verteidigt sie nicht die Demokratie, sondern ermöglicht den Aufstieg der Rechten. Die Ampel-Parteien sind Teil des Problems, nicht der Lösung. Nach einem Treffen von AfD- und CDU-Mitgliedern mit Kapitaleigentümern, auf dem Pläne zu Massendeportationen diskutiert wurden, wird nun auf den Straßen »Ganz Deutschland hasst die AfD« skandiert. Währenddessen legt die Ampel-Regierung die Grundlage, um genau solche Pläne umzusetzen: Quelle: Jacobindazu auch: Kundgebungen und Protestzüge: Wo am Wochenende gegen rechts demonstriert wird Die Berichte über ein Treffen rechter und rechtsextremer Netzwerker zu massenhafter Vertreibung hat viele Menschen aufgeschreckt. Zehntausende wollen erneut auf die Straße gehen. Der Überblick. Quelle: DER SPIEGEL
Sie muss einfach die Böse sein – Correctiv, Wagenknecht und die Hexenprobe Nicht, dass sich durch diese immer häufiger werdenden Manöver die gesamte Politik in ein absurdes Theater verwandelt, das mit der traurigen Realität der Republik keinerlei Verbindung mehr hat, ist dabei das Schlimmste. Auch nicht, dass derart viele Medienvertreter und Politiker die minimalsten Grundsätze der Mitmenschlichkeit entbehren. Das wäre unschön, aber kommt vor in diesen Gewerben. Aber dass sie es geschafft haben, die eigentlich gebotene Menschlichkeit so sehr zum Vorwurf zu wenden, dass jemand wie Wagenknecht sich für ein Verhalten entschuldigt, das keinerlei Vergehen darstellt, das ist ein sehr schlechtes, ein düsteres Zeichen für den Zustand der Gesellschaft. Es ist die Art und Weise, wie in einer Umgebung, die geradezu hysterisch betont, wie wichtig ihr Individualität sei, das wirkliche Individuum durch den Mangel an Humanität zum Verstummen gebracht wird. Quelle: Dagmar Henn auf RT DEAnmerkung unseres Lesers G.J.: Das Verfahren der Hexenprobe ist in der beschriebenen Form zwar weitgehend unhistorisch (und mit den Regeln des Inquisitionsprozesses hat es erst recht nichts zu tun), aber es stellt ein treffendes Bild für den derzeitigen Zustand der politischen Öffentlichkeit dar.Anmerkung Christian Reimann: Bitte lesen Sie dazu auch Lanz wird rückfällig gegen Wagenknecht.
Grüne nimmt Einfluss auf die „Tagesschau“: Berichte über Demos gegen AfD statt Bauernproteste In den ÖRR-Medien wird der Fokus derzeit auf die Berichterstattung über „Demos gegen rechts“ gelegt. Steckt politische Einflussnahme dahinter? Ob gegen die Bundesregierung oder die Opposition, Deutschland ist ins neue Jahr mit massiven Protesten gestartet. Die Straße des 17. Juni ist nach wie vor von Traktoren besetzt. Am Mittwoch versammelten sich nun Tausende Menschen vor dem Roten Rathaus, um gegen Rechtsextremismus zu demonstrieren. Viele Medien haben darüber berichtet, doch manchen war die Berichterstattung des öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunks (ÖRR) nicht prominent genug. Die NDR-Rundfunkrätin Jessica Kordouni (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen) äußerte ihre Unzufriedenheit. Quelle: Berliner Zeitung
Bis zu zwei Monate kein Bürgergeld: Verschärfte Sanktionen gelten befristet Arbeitsminister Heil setzt sich durch. Scharfe Kritik von Jusos und Sozialverbänden. Vor allem eine Zahl sorgt für Irritationen. Bundesarbeitsminister Hubertus Heil (SPD) hat sich durchgesetzt: Erwerbslosen kann für bis zu zwei Monate der Bürgergeld-Regelsatz für Ernährung, Hygiene, Kleidung, Hausrat und Strom komplett gestrichen werden, wenn sie gegen die sogenannte Mitwirkungspflicht bei der Jobvermittlung verstoßen. […] Irritationen gab es über die genannte Summe, die dadurch eingespart werden könne, da Heil von “einigen wenigen” Betroffenen gesprochen hatte, andererseits aber von 170 Millionen Euro. “Um 170 Millionen Euro im Jahr einzusparen, müssten etwa 150.000 Bürgergeldbeziehende entsprechend sanktioniert werden. So viele willentliche Verweigerer gibt es nicht”, hatte der Hauptgeschäftsführer des Paritätischen Gesamtverbands, Ulrich Schneider vergangene Woche erklärt. Quelle: Telepolis
Ist Europa ohne Amerika verloren? Die US-Wahlen im November werden sicherlich das politische Ereignis des Jahres sein. Aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach werden Biden und Trump in einer Neuauflage der Wahl von 2020 gegeneinander antreten. Es sei denn, Trump wird von der Wahl ausgeschlossen: ihm wird vorgeworfen, die Proteste vom 6. Januar 2021 vor dem Kapitol in Washington angestiftet zu haben. Oder Joe Biden könnte von seiner Partei zugunsten eines jüngeren Kandidaten aus dem Rennen geworfen werden – was im Moment, trotz alledem, was man darüber schreibt, recht unwahrscheinlich erscheint. Quelle: Globalbridge
Israel-Krieg und Menschenrechte: Netanjahus Werk und der Ampel Beitrag Während die Zahl vor allem ziviler Opfer im Gazastreifen weiter steigt und der Internationale Gerichtshof (IGH) in Den Haag über eine Völkermordanklage gegen die israelischen Streitkräfte und die nationalreligiöse Regierung von Ministerpräsident Benjamin Netanjahu zu entscheiden hat, ist in Deutschland, zumal von Regierungsseite, kaum Kritik an der israelischen Kriegsführung zu hören. Anders in den USA. In der New York Times (NYT) appellierte die US-Journalistin Megan K. Stack kürzlich: “Don’t Turn Away From the Charges of Genocide Against Israel” und forderte damit, die Klage Südafrikas ernst zu nehmen. Die NYT-Journalistin kritisierte die “oberflächliche Ablehnung” der IGH-Klage durch die US-Regierung. Deren Vertreter lehnen die südafrikanische Initiative ebenso entschieden ab wie die deutsche Bundesregierung. Washington und Berlin haben damit offenbar ohne jede Bedenken eine politisch motivierte Position gegen ein zentrales Instrument des Völkerrechts eingenommen – und das mitten in einem laufenden Verfahren. Quelle: Telepolisdazu auch: Diplomatischer Einsatz für sofortigen Waffenstillstand und Geiselfreilassung statt Waffenlieferungen an Israel: Bundesregierung will Panzermunition an Israel liefern Die ärztliche Friedensorganisation IPPNW fordert die Bundesregierung auf, keine weiteren Waffen an Israel zu liefern und sich stattdessen für einen sofortigen Waffenstillstand auf beiden Seiten und eine Freilassung der Geiseln einzusetzen. Laut einem Bericht des „Spiegel“ haben sich die beteiligten Ressorts geeinigt, Panzermunition an Israel zu liefern – trotz der horrenden Opferzahl auf palästinensischer Seite. Die Ärzt*innenorganisation begrüßt, dass der Internationale Gerichtshof die Völkermordklage Südafrikas untersucht, und hofft, dass seine anstehende Entscheidung zur Beendigung des katastrophalen Krieges im Nahen Osten beiträgt. Als Vertragspartei des Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) ist Deutschland verpflichtet, keine Transfers konventioneller Waffen zu genehmigen, wenn die Möglichkeit besteht, dass Waffen z.B. zur Begehung von Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit, Angriffe auf zivile Objekte oder Zivilpersonen oder andere Kriegsverbrechen verwendet werden könnten. Quelle: IPPNW
Am 17. Februar endet das Grundrecht auf freie Meinungsäußerung im Internet Wenn am 17. Februar der Digital Services Act der EU in Deutschland in vollem Umfang in Kraft tritt, wird aus dem Grundrecht auf freie Äußerung aller nicht rechtswidrigen Meinungen das Recht, Meinungen zu äußern, die eine Überwachungsbürokratie mit Zentrale in Brüssel nicht als schädlich betrachtet. Wie das vonstatten geht, hat der Richter im Ruhestand, Manfred Kölsch, in einem Gastbeitrag in der Berliner Zeitung dargelegt. Wir dürfen gespannt sein, ob unsere intensiv mit der Regierung kungelnden Verfassungsrichter daran irgendwann etwas auszusetzen haben werden. Quelle: Norbert Häring
Fakebauern kassieren EU-Agrarsubventionen: Landwirte und Höfe nicht unter Topempfängern. Nutznießer etwa Kommunen, Finanzinvestoren, Konzerne – und Umweltverbände Es klingt wie eine Binse: EU-Agrarsubventionen sind für Landwirte und Hofbetreiber. Für wen sonst, oder? Weit gefehlt! Unter den Top-ten der Empfänger hierzulande ist kein landwirtschaftlicher Betrieb, kein Rübenbauer, kein Viehhalter. Wer kassiert? Ministerien, Landesbetriebe, Agrarriesen. Und branchenferne Konzerne, etwa RWE, Aldi Nord. Eines frappiert beim Blick in die Liste der Nutznießer: Umweltverbände, der Naturschutzbund Deutschland (Nabu) und der Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (BUND) beziehen gleichfalls Millionensummen aus Fördertöpfen der Gemeinsamen Agrarpolitik (GAP) der EU. Laut Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE) gingen 2022 insgesamt sieben Milliarden Euro aus Brüssel an 315.000 Berechtigte in der BRD. Quelle: junge Welt
Solarenergie: Ein verspätetes Ultimatum Solarpanels aus Sachsen gegenüber chinesischen nicht konkurrenzfähig. Europas größtes Werk vor Schließung. Besitzer fordern Subventionen Im sächsischen Freiberg werde Anfang April »die größte in Betrieb befindliche Solarmodulproduktion Europas« geschlossen, teilte am Mittwoch die schweizerische Meyer Burger AG mit, der das Werk am Fuße des Osterzgebirges gehört. Rund 500 Beschäftigte wären betroffen. Zu retten wäre der Standort durch »Resilienzmaßnahmen« von EU und deutscher Ampelkoalition, ergänzte CEO Gunter Erfurt in der Mitteilung, ohne die zur »Herstellung eines fairen Wettbewerbs« nötigen Subventionen genau zu beziffern. Sagen lasse sich nur, dass sie »bis zur weiten Februarhälfte« fließen müssten. Sonst sei Schluss in der Silberstadt. Ein irres Ultimatum. Zumal der CEO selbst erklärte, wie weit die Produktion in Sachsen hinter der in China zurückliegt. Sonnenkollektoren aus der Volksrepublik seien in Europa oft genug zu einem Viertel der hiesigen Herstellungskosten erhältlich, erklärte der Firmenboss. Quelle: junge Welt
Krise beim Wohnungsbau verschärft sich weiter Der Abwärtstrend der Baubranche beschleunigt sich weiter. Die Zahl der Baugenehmigungen ist zum Ende des abgelaufenen Jahres noch einmal drastisch zurückgegangen. Die Hoffnung liegt auf fallenden Zinsen in diesem Jahr. Deutschland hängt seinen eigenen Zielen beim Wohnungsbau immer weiter hinterher. Wie das Statistische Bundesamt mitteilte, ist die Zahl der Baugenehmigungen für neue Wohnungen im November weiter zurückgegangen. Sie sank auf 20.200, was im Vorjahresvergleich ein Minus von 4.100 Genehmigungen oder 16,9 Prozent bedeutet. Die Genehmigungszahlen gehen seit Monaten mit zweistelligen Raten zurück. Quelle: tagesschaudazu: Wie der Staat die Preisanstiege am Wohnungsmarkt weiter befeuert Statt bezahlbaren Wohnraum zu schaffen, übernimmt der Staat vielfach überhöhte Mieten für Bedürftige, zeigt eine aktuelle Studie. Experten fordern nun vor allem eine Maßnahme. Quelle: Handelsblattdazu auch: Miethai sagt Danke. Beim sozialen Wohnungsbau steht die Ampel auf Rot. Quelle: NachDenkSeiten
Argentinien am Scheideweg: Die Herausforderungen des radikalen Liberalismus Mit Javier Milei hat Argentinien einen libertären Präsidenten bekommen. Sein Programm wird hierzulande gelobt. Aber es ist zum Scheitern verurteilt. Ein Kommentar. Man kann gar nicht radikal genug sein, wenn man nur liberal oder libertär ist. In einer Gesellschaft, die vor jeder Art von Radikalität zurückschreckt, wird der radikale Liberalismus doch wenigstens klammheimlich bewundert. Argentiniens neuer Präsident, den viele in seinem Land den “Verrückten” nennen, wird auf diese Weise auf einmal zu einem ernst zu nehmenden Politstrategen. Super-liberale Medien wie das Handelsblatt oder die Neue Zürcher Zeitung bemühen sich, “Experten” zu finden, die ihnen das Lob für Argentiniens neuen Präsidenten leicht machen, weil sie vom gleichen Holz wie Milei selbst geschnitzt sind. Kiel (das radikalliberale Institut für Weltwirtschaft in Deutschland) und FIEL (das nicht minder radikale Institut in Argentinien) sind dabei einschlägige Adressen. Auch der Chefredakteur der Welt bescheinigt Milei “ökonomische Kompetenz” und schaut mit unverhohlener Bewunderung auf diesen revolutionären Versuch. Quelle: Heiner Flassbeck auf Telepolis
Badhrakumar: Entschlüsselung von Irans Raketen- und Drohnenangriffen Die überwältigenden Raketen- und Drohnenangriffe auf drei Länder – Syrien, Irak und Pakistan – innerhalb von 24 Stunden und der außergewöhnliche Schritt Teherans, die Verantwortung für die Angriffe bekannt zu geben, waren eine sehr deutliche Botschaft an Washington, dass dessen Strategie, eine Koalition von Terrorgruppen in der Region um den Iran zu schaffen, entschlossen zurückgeschlagen wird. Dass die US-Strategie gegen den Iran neue Formen annimmt, zeichnete sich nach dem Angriff auf Israel am 7. Oktober und der damit einhergehenden Erosion seiner Stellung als regionaler Vormacht ab. Die von China vermittelte Annäherung zwischen Iran und Saudi-Arabien und die Aufnahme Irans, Saudi-Arabiens, der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate und Ägyptens in BRICS versetzten die US-Strategen in Panik. Quelle: Seniora.org
Gender-Pay-Gap 2023 – Bund (18 Prozent) und Länder (von 22 Prozent bis 4 Prozent) Eine unkommentierte BIAJ-Tabelle zu den Unterschieden der Bruttostundenverdienste der Frauen und Männer in 2023 (Stichmonat April). In 2023 verdienten Frauen pro Stunde (brutto) durchschnittlich 4,46 Euro weniger als Männer. Dieser durchschnittliche Verdienstunterschied pro Stunde reicht im Ländervergleich von 5,96 Euro in Baden-Württemberg (BW) bis 0,85 Euro in Brandenburg (BB). (BIAJ-Tabelle, Spalte 7) Gemessen in Prozent verdienten Frauen durchschnittlich (gerundete) 18 Prozent weniger als Männer. Im Ländervergleich reicht dieser sog. Gender-Pay-Gap (GPG) von 22 Prozent in Baden-Württemberg (BW) bis 4 Prozent in Brandenburg (MV) (BIAJ-Tabelle, Spalte 9). Anders betrachtet: In Bezug auf den durchschnittlichen Bruttostundenverdienst der Frauen verdienten Männer durchschnittlich (gerundete) 21 Prozent mehr als Frauen. Im Ländervergleich reicht dieser Verdienstunterschied von 28 Prozent in Baden-Württemberg (BW) bis 4 Prozent in Brandenburg (BB). Quelle: BIAJ
Stärkung der Tarifautonomie: Allgemeinverbindlichkeit und Bonusleistungen für organisierte Beschäftigte sind vereinbar Die deutsche Tariflandschaft ist ausgedünnt: Aktuell hat nur noch gut die Hälfte der Beschäftigten einen Tarifvertrag. Als Beitrag gegen Niedriglöhne, Armut und soziale Ungleichheit schreibt die Europäische Union vor, dass die Mitgliedsstaaten bei einer Tarifabdeckung von weniger als 80 Prozent Maßnahmen zur Stabilisierung des Tarifsystems ergreifen. Die Ampelparteien haben sich in ihrem Koalitionsvertrag dazu verpflichtet. Es gibt mehrere mögliche Instrumente: Eines wären mehr Allgemeinverbindlicherklärungen (AVE). Dabei wird ein Tarifvertrag für eine Branche auch für die bisher nicht tarifgebundenen Arbeitgeber und Arbeitnehmer in seinem Geltungsbereich verbindlich, nachdem der Bundesarbeitsminister eine AVE ausgesprochen hat. Ein anderes Mittel: Um die Mitgliedschaft in einer Gewerkschaft attraktiver zu machen und so zu einer funktionierenden Tarifautonomie beizutragen, könnten sich die Tarifparteien zudem auf Klauseln einigen, die bestimmte Leistungen ausschließlich für gewerkschaftlich organisierte Beschäftigte vorsehen. Beide Instrumente werden in unterschiedlichem Rahmen bereits praktisch angewandt: Quelle: Hans Böckler Stiftung
Zu guter Letzt: Die AfD und ihre Remigration – Küppersbusch TV Christian #Lindner fordert ein Sparen an den komplett falschen Stellen, die #AfD fordert #Remigration – oder wahrheitsgemäß ausgedrückt: #Deportation. Beide Forderungen hätten katastrophale Folgen für unser Zusammenleben. Außerdem ein Geschichtsvergleich: Otto Ernst #Remer & Björn #Höcke. Sowie der Einlauf von #Wagenknecht. Viel Spaß und gute Unterhaltung! Quelle: Küppersbusch TV via YouTube
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Derogate fundamental human rights by creating Woke conflicts and social divisions which ultimately undermine broader acts of solidarity and resistance against the hegemony of the “Big Money” financial establishment.
Woke Lunacy also serves to distract people from the ramped poverty and social inequality triggered by the corona crisis, not to mention the devastating impacts of the Covid-19 vaccine on excess mortality.
Michel Chossudovsky. Global Research, January 19, 2023
***
Not one of the items that follow will strike a typical resident of the “collective West,” aka the 14 percent of the world that styles itself as the “international community,” as inherently improbable or even odd in many instances. They have grown accustomed to it; it is part of their everyday landscape.
Here, for illustrative purposes, is a select but representative sample of policies and prescribed behaviours that in that bizarre but thankfully shrinking part of the world have come to constitute the new normal.
Five Selected Woke Policies
1. In order to maintain the fiction that in their attributes men and women are physiologically indistinguishable, the Canadian government has mandated the installation of tampon dispensers in men’s bathrooms. The empirical fact that men have no use for tampons is trumped by ideology, which dictates categorically that they do because it is dogmatically prescribed that men do menstruate and are furthermore able to give birth to babies. People who believe themselves to be something they are not, and claim that their subjective self-perception overrides reality, are politically empowered to cancel empirical observation and the conclusions reached by scientists who perform accurate, verifiable research.
2. Also on the ideological reality chopping block is terminology that points to pre-woke, common sense notions about natural relations between human beings. “Mother” and “father, “expressions that allude to the manifestly different roles of parents in the process of conception and nurture of offspring, in the woke-controlled universe have been forcibly replaced by designations “parent no. 1” and “parent no. 2,” invented to hide those facts. Now the Methodist Church of Great Britain has gone a step farther, to label terms “husband” and “wife” offensive. Inspired by inclusivity, the technical rationale for this departure from normalcy is “to avoid making assumptions” that are not “the reality for many people.”
3. The avant-garde state of California has passed a law that takes effect this year, AB 1084, requiring large retail stores to include gender neutral toy sections or face fines and other punishments. The new law will place an additional undue burden on retailers and will have the foreseeable economic impact of raising the price of toys generally for normal families and their children. Incidentally, it is anybody’s guess what the definition of gender neutral toys is and whether there is a market for such items. But in a parallel universe governed by ideological delusions these are inconsequential details.
4. In Britain, the country where the novel 1984, which introduced the notion of thought crime, had been written, the first literal thought crime prosecutions have recently been instituted. Isabel Vaughan Spruce, Director of UK March for Life, so far has been cited by the police three times and taken to court for silently praying in front of abortion clinics. Readers should note that her arrests were triggered not by speech or conduct but for an “objectionable” activity that was purely mental. British authorities did not contest her right as a citizen (or royal subject, if you wish) to be in the public space where she was detained. Detention and prosecution were based entirely on their perception of what allegedly was going on in her mind, in the proximity of an abortion clinic, which the authorities considered might be provocative and perturbing to the consumers of the clinic’s services. Readers should be aware that in common law the concept of thought transgression does not exist and that so far the British Parliament has not given statutory expression to such an offence. Nevertheless, an actual person presumably endowed with human rights has been subjected to persecution for objectively unprovable thoughts in order to enforce a legally non-existent norm. But that is the new normal, the rules based order of woke jurisprudence now taking shape in the land that once prided itself on upholding the “rights of Englishmen,” no matter how eccentric. Even the KGB in the old days could not have made this up.
5. Returning to avant-garde California, award-winning Glendale fifth-grade teacher Ray Shelton was suspended for refusing to acquiesce to male students who “identify” as girls stripping naked in front of female students in the girls’ changing room.For opposing the transgender agenda in his school Shelton lost his job. It made no difference that female students and their parents fully supported him and also vehemently objected to these aggressive displays of opposite sex nudity. Glendale happens to be a heavily Armenian suburb of Los Angeles and its overwhelmingly normal residents are unacculturated to progressive Western values. They reacted with consternation to the state-orchestrated sexualisation of their children. Their protests, however, were to no avail. Shelton is now suing the state for damages. Good luck, in the judicial system of the deranged state of California.
These morsels of lunacy might be regarded as the tragicomical final stage in the collapse of a suicidal civilisation except for the fact that by means of highhanded political manipulation and arrogant agenda imposition even nations and cultures which still retain a residue of sanity are being cowed into submission and drawn into the abyss. Let Serbia serve as an instructive case study, foreshadowing the contours of the coming dystopia.
Serbia. Submission to Western Values
For a number of years already and to the utter disgust of its citizens the Serbian government has been signalling its submission to Western values by allowing the parade that the Russian government has had the good sense to prohibit. But that is the least of it. Under the radar, Serbia’s colonial administration recently reconfirmed its fealty to the foreign masters by passing a gender equality law with severely restrictive provisions, copy/pasted from analogous legislation already in effect in the aforementioned 14 percent and shrinking portion of the known world.
As of April of this year, on pain of heavy penalties, in all gender related matters Serbs will be required to mimic their collective West models. The educational system, including textbooks, and all public sector communication will be reorganised to reflect the newly mandated guidelines. The imposition of gender sensitive language, including pronouns, ranks high on this agenda. Serbian parents will be obliged to conform willingly to the whims of their soon to be brainwashed children, acquiesce to gender transition hormone treatments for their youngsters, and to strictly observe the pronoun regime that will be demanded of them. Resistance will result in steep fines and prison sentences and in their offspring being forcibly removed from parental custody to be placed in government-approved foster care.
The alert reader might ask what compels Serbia to pass laws that an overwhelming majority of its citizens, perhaps exceeding in number even those who support Russia’s Special Military Operation, find utterly abhorrent. Serbia is not a member of the European Union nor is it obligated by any treaty to embrace such culturally alien norms.
In Serbia, there does not seem to be anybody capable of providing a coherent answer to this very pertinent question, though it may reasonably be inferred that the subservient position of the political elite vis-à-vis their foreign curators probably has something to do with it. But as Serbian academic and spokesman for Serbia’s Family Defence Coalition, Dr. Miša Djurković, has discovered, in his country it is inadvisable even to pose such questions. He and his colleagues, also distinguished academics and public intellectuals, have been targeted with malicious harassmentlawsuits for “discrimination” (readers from Western countries know exactly how that works) to the point where their patience and financial resources are now exhausted.
As a result, Dr. Djurković has sadly decided to terminate his pro-family activities. He recently published a tongue-in-cheek “apology” to his woke detractors, the powerful foreign supported and abundantly financed lobby that is wreaking havoc on his country’s morals and culture whilst subverting the remnants of its degraded legal system. (Readers with a command of the Serbian language may peruse his downhearted missive here.) Needless to say, the very subtlety of the genre Dr. Djurković has chosen to announce his “capitulation” ensures that his point will be entirely lost on the woke ruffians to whose terror, one hopes only temporarily, he appears to have succumbed.
The nefarious agenda that Dr. Djurković had attempted valiantly to oppose in his home country may well triumph, in Serbia and elsewhere, if Bertrand Russell’s nightmarish post-human vision ever comes true, and the collective West’s luciferian engineers of human souls manage to massively implant in the human consciousness “the unshakable conviction that snow is black.” That is the goal that Russell quite frankly proposed they pursue. But those were not Lord Russell’s private musings. It was the authoritative articulation of the ideology which animates the perpetrators of what Archbishop Vigano has called the “global coup d’état, the all-out war against humanity not motivated only by a lust for wealth and power but mainly by a religious motive …” Russell was in his time a leading intellectual oracle of those very perpetrators. Their pseudo-religious motive, Vigano explains, is “Satan’s hatred: hatred of God, hatred of God’s creation and hatred of man who is created in the image and likeness of God.” The Archbishop is spot on.
Compulsory denial of the evidence of one’s senses and obligatory surrender to repugnant nonsense constitutes the initial step in that direction. That most certainly is not a scheme for the betterment of society. It is a blueprint for the crushing of the human spirit, leading ultimately to its total subjugation.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Stephen Karganovic is president of “Srebrenica Historical Project,” an NGO registered in the Netherlands to investigate the factual matrix and background of events that took place in Srebrenica in July of 1995. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.
The original source of this article is Global Research
«I cannot think of a more dangerous initiative than this.» Nigel Farage comments on the recent call by unelected head of the EU, Ursula von der Leyen, for world leaders to roll out digital ID, CBDC and a cashless society—globally—by 2030. «If we’re not careful, we head towards… pic.twitter.com/RHkvwhqFls— Wide Awake Media (@wideawake_media)
You’ve probably heard the names of prominent figures in the history of the United States — Washington, Adams, Grant, Sherman and others. However, there is another side to North American history, less known, but also replete with heroes.
Mexican and French America, black and yellow have their own pantheon. Today we will talk about Native Americans and the leaders of their peoples.
Tecumseh
He was a military leader of the Shawnee people. Born in the Ohio River Valley in 1769. From the age of 20, together with his older brother, he began to undertake raids on border settlements in the states of Tennessee and Kentucky. Having suffered a series of sensitive defeats, he decided to act on his own: he went to Indiana, gathered a group of Indian youth and quickly became a respected field leader. And the younger brother suddenly began to receive visions and turned into a prophet, somehow managing to predict a solar eclipse (probably, one of the whites, who was no stranger to astronomy, told him).
The visionary gift was put to the service of the needs of defense: prophecies of imminent glory were made, forcing a number of tribes to unite in Tippecanoe , also known as Propet’s Town .
It is not known how far things would have gone, but in 1810, taking advantage of the departure of the leaders to recruit new soldiers, Brigadier General of the United States Army William Henry Harrison attacked the settlement of the Indian coalition, massacring most of the inhabitants.
In response, Tecumseh supported England in the outbreak of the War of 1812, but the warrior’s luck betrayed him — he fell in the Battle of the Thames on October 5, 1813. After his death, the Americans paid tribute to the outstanding Indian, highly appreciating his oratorical talent and abilities as an organizer and diplomat.
Geronimo
According to a number of researchers, the most famous Indian leader. He led the Bedonkow tribe in Chiricahua, one of the Apache tribes. Born in June 1829. He became a man early — before he was 18 he managed to carry out four independent raids, and he ate the first heart of the pale-faced man (or rather, not really — the Mexicans were Geronimo’s enemies) soon after he was 14.
The leader’s wife and three children were killed by soldiers of the Mexican army, which resulted in a series of raids on lands in New Mexico and Arizona. In 1848, after losing the war, the government of the United Mexican States ceded the tribe’s lands to its northern neighbor under the Treaty of Guadalupe-Guidalgo.
Conflicts with Mexican settlers gave way to clashes with Tejanos and settlers from the East Coast, as well as nomadic tribes of Indians allied with the United States who received pastures here. Years of struggle resulted in Bedonkow’s eviction to the ethereal deserts of Arizona.
Almost unsuitable for life for a sedentary, agricultural people, the lands were densely strewn with Indian bones. When it became clear that it was impossible to live like this any longer, Geronimo rebelled and for 12 long years tormented the federal army and the local population with desperate raids.
Crazy horse
A warrior with a fearsome reputation and chief of the Oglala Sioux tribe, Crazy Horse was born around 1840 in South Dakota. His youth occurred during a period of difficult relations between the Sioux people and the government. In the fall of 1854, Sioux Chief War Bear was killed by a white soldier. The Indians responded by killing a 30-man force and killing an army lieutenant.
The young Indian proved himself to be a talented guerrilla, annoying enemy soldiers with frequent raids. Horse’s most famous battle was at the Little Big Horn, where the desperate Sioux managed to almost completely slaughter Custer’s detachment. Unable to achieve victory on the battlefield, the government resorted to scorched earth tactics and forced the enemy to surrender. While in captivity, the Indian was killed with a bayonet in the back. According to the official version, he tried to escape from captivity.
Chief Seattle
Born in 1790, Seattle, due to his origin, led two tribes at once (his father was the leader of one, and his maternal grandfather was the leader of the other). He lived in the territory of modern Washington State, the tribe’s lands were located along Paget Sound.
Initially, he greeted the settlers very warmly and allocated them land in Eliot Bay, but constant disagreements with other tribes provoked an attack on the colony and a massacre. Faced with reality, the leader realized that the influx of colonists would lead to the loss of his tribe’s land holdings. He realized that he could not withstand such a force alone, and tried to resolve differences peacefully.
Contemporaries know Seattle’s name in the context of the green movement: there is an apocryphal text attributed to the famous Native American. A falsification for unclear purposes was written by one Dr. Henry Adam Smith in 1888.
Kochiso
Absolutely nothing is known about the childhood of the greatest of the Apaches — not even his date of birth. Tall for his time — a classic six feet — he was an imposing figure, rallying the militant members of his people and leading them in raids against both Mexico and the United States.
The conflict with the latter ultimately led to his death.
Here is how it was. In 1961, other non-Cochisaw Apaches kidnapped a white child, and an inexperienced but zealous US Army officer sent from Washington accused the peaceful tribe of this crime. An attempt to arrest the alleged culprit resulted in a shot in the back and an escalation of violence. The Apaches were saved from massacre by the Civil War, but after its end the federals returned armed to the teeth and began to systematically destroy the Indians, tribe by tribe.
The war was merciless, and the Yankees eventually promised Cochiseaw a large portion of Arizona as a reservation. He agreed, and the legends brought to us the following answer from the glorious leader:
“The white man and the Indian should drink the same water, eat the same bread and live in harmony and peace.”
Sitting Bull
Sitting Bull of the Hunkpapa Lakota tribe is revered as a saint. Born in 1831, he became a warrior at an early age, making his first raid at the age of 14. The first serious battle occurred in 1863 with soldiers of the Kentucky Regiment, and by 1868 he became the main leader of the tribe.
Full-scale hostilities began in 1874 when gold was discovered in the Lakota sacred Black Hills of South Dakota.
Lakota warriors led by Bull fought alongside Horse at Little Big Horn. After the defeat, the remaining warriors fled to Canada, signed a peace treaty with the administration in 1881 and agreed to settle on the reservation. And Sitting Bull was shot and killed during a shootout between the police and supporters of the tribe’s independence.
Mangas-Coloradas
One of the most influential Native American leaders of the 19th century was the father-in-law of Cochiseaw and the Apache. Born in the 90s of the 18th century, he was tall and strong and became a leader after the death of his predecessor in 1837.
The Mexican leadership then gave rewards for the scalps of the Indians, and the headhunters made good money. Mangas-Coloradas proclaimed that he would take revenge — and massacred the entire population of the town of Santa Rita.
With the outbreak of the Mexican-American War in 1848, Mangas-Coloradas considered the Yankees the saviors of his people and hastened to conclude an agreement with them in order to bind them into allied relations with the American army. For fifteen years everything was fine until silver was discovered in the region. Then they put the parting on the treaty, and the leader himself was treacherously killed in 1863, sending assassins to him under a flag of truce. The body was chopped up to make identification difficult.
The American spacecraft Peregrine One, which carried the Ukrainian flag to the Moon, burned up in the Earth’s atmosphere over the Pacific Ocean. The mission did not achieve its goal: due to an engine failure, the device did not reach its destination.
Declan Hayes
Der Friedensstifter 