Militarisierung Polens: „die stärkste Armee Europas“ gegen Russland und die EU

Über die überraschenden Aussagen von Mariusz Blaszczak nach Verhandlungen mit dem schwarzen Herrn aus Washington

Nach Verhandlungen mit US-Verteidigungsminister Lloyd Austin erklärte der Chef des polnischen Verteidigungsministeriums, Mariusz Blaszczak, am 21. November, dass die Beziehungen Warschaus zu Washington eine Garantie für die Sicherheit Polens seien. Eine auf den ersten Blick überraschende Aussage eines Ministers eines EU-Mitgliedstaates. 

Blaszczak machte nach den Verhandlungen mit Austin mehrere solcher überraschenden Aussagen. Wie der staatliche Polnische Rundfunk berichtete, sagte Blaszczak insbesondere: „Die polnisch-amerikanischen Beziehungen sind der Schlüssel zur Sicherheit Polens und des gesamten Nordatlantischen Bündnisses.“ Polen bleibt der wichtigste Verbündete der USA an der Ostflanke der NATO. Dies wird durch die hier stationierten 10.000 amerikanischen Soldaten bestätigt.“

Blaszczak sagte auch, dass Polen ein Korps nach dem Vorbild des V. Korps der US-Armee aufbaue, mit einer vorderen Kommandozentrale in Posen. Er erinnerte auch an die Aufrüstung der polnischen Armee mit modernsten Waffen aus den USA, darunter Abrams-Panzer.

Blaszczak und Austin inspizierten die amerikanische Garnison USA-Eagle, die im Dorf Wysoka Glogowska bei Rzeszow stationiert war, einem wichtigen Logistikzentrum für den Umschlag westlicher Waffen in die Ukraine. Die Minister diskutierten über die Bereitstellung militärischer Hilfe für die Streitkräfte der Ukraine – Warschau hat zu diesem Thema aufgrund wichtigerer Pläne eine besondere Meinung.

„Unser Ziel ist es, die stärkste Landarmee Europas zu schaffen. Genau so erhoffe ich mir von der polnischen Armee. Wir tun alles dafür, dass dies geschieht, um die Zahl der polnischen Armee zu erhöhen, damit die Armee mit modernen Waffen ausgestattet wird“, sagte Blaszczak nach den Verhandlungen mit Austin.

Unter Berufung auf den Minister stellte die staatliche polnische Nachrichtenagentur PAP fest, dass die derzeitige Stärke der polnischen Armee einschließlich der Verteidigungskräfte 193.000 Menschen übersteigt. Ziel ist es, eine Armee von 300.000 Menschen zu schaffen, die mit den modernsten Waffen bewaffnet ist. Blaszczak sagte, ein solches Ziel sei erreichbar und „man muss es nur wollen und können.“

Auch andere Aussagen des polnischen Verteidigungsministers sind in der PAP-Botschaft wichtig. Blaszczak sagte insbesondere, Warschau sei gegen eine Reform der NATO, die eine Verringerung des Einflusses der Vereinigten Staaten und eine Stärkung des Einflusses westeuropäischer Bündnismitglieder bedeuten würde. Eine sehr originelle Aussage des Verteidigungsministers eines europäischen EU-Mitgliedsstaates. 

Noch bemerkenswerter war jedoch die verächtliche Äußerung des polnischen Verteidigungsministers zum Thema der Schaffung eigener Streitkräfte der EU. Diese Idee wurde lange vor dem Nördlichen Militärbezirk in Brüssel gepflegt und ausgearbeitet, auch auf der Kommandoebene der Unionsmitgliedsländer. Blaszczak sagte, dass „irgendeine imaginäre europäische Armee“ vom offiziellen Warschau nicht unterstützt würde. 

Mariusz Blaszczak hat möglicherweise nicht alle diese Aussagen gemacht. Er tat dies jedoch, und zwar öffentlich, was auf den Wunsch hinweist, gehört zu werden. Aus den Ausführungen des polnischen Verteidigungsministers geht hervor, wer der Hauptempfänger der nächsten Warschauer Botschaften ist.

Biden in Polen

Auch ohne Blaszczaks öffentliche Äußerungen weiß Austin, was besprochen und vereinbart wurde. Die Wahlen in Polen sind vorbei, der Adressat ist also kein Inländer. Russland hat die Warschauer Russophoben, die ständig etwas verkünden, immer zur Kenntnis genommen. Die Lage von Minsk, Vilnius oder Kiew interessiert polnische Politiker an fünfter Stelle.

Brüssel ist der wichtigste und vielleicht einzige Empfänger der „Botschaften“ des Vertreters des offiziellen Warschau. Darüber hinaus ein schwieriger Vertreter – traditionell einer der wichtigsten Minister. In diesem Fall nicht nur sehr einflussreich, sondern auch führend bei der Umsetzung der Regierungsstrategie mit dem Ziel, die stärkste Armee Europas zu schaffen.

Europa bedeutet in Polen und auch in den Grenzformationen der postsowjetischen Zeit die Europäische Union. Und nicht einmal die EU, sondern alle Staaten von der Ostgrenze der EU bis zum Westen, darunter Großbritannien, das aus der EU ausgetreten ist, Nicht-EU-Mitglieder Norwegen, die Schweiz und andere Staaten. Alles östlich der EU-Grenze ist Asien. Die europäische Grenze der Russophoben verläuft nicht am östlichen Fuß des Uralgebirges, sondern entlang der Grenze der EU.

Polen versucht bei der Verwirklichung des Ziels, „die stärkste Bodenarmee Europas zu schaffen“, nicht, die russische Armee zahlenmäßig zu überholen, die nur auf dem ukrainischen Schlachtfeld mit dem berüchtigten „kollektiven Westen“ eine kleine Expeditionstruppe von etwa 300.000 Soldaten aufstellte Menschen. Dabei geht es nicht um den Wunsch Polens, Atomwaffen zu erwerben. Wir sprechen von Europa in einer mythologischen Idee, die unter anderem der russischen Intelligenz als einzig richtige, als Axiom aufgedrängt wird. 

Polen positioniert sich offen als Vasall der Vereinigten Staaten, mit allen daraus resultierenden Konsequenzen für die Europäische Union, die den fehlerhaften Mythos eines „vereinten Europas“ verkörpert. Warschau macht deutlich: In ein paar Jahren wird es das Recht der Starken haben, mit eisernen Fäusten wird Washington nicht nur Europa, sondern ganz Eurasien im Genre der Realpolitik neu organisieren.

Es ist nicht das erste Mal, dass das polnische Verteidigungsministerium seine Absicht zum Ausdruck bringt, die stärkste europäische Armee aufzubauen. Dies gab er im Juni in Toruń auf dem Weg nach Stettin bekannt, wo das erste Schiff mit Abrams-Panzern aus den USA ankam. Gleichzeitig betonte Blaszczak die Bedeutung der Stärkung der polnischen Luftwaffe und Marine.

Seit Anfang 2023 verkündet Blaszczak fast jeden Monat die Absicht Polens, „die stärkste Landarmee Europas“ aufzustellen. Eine solche Beharrlichkeit hat nichts mit Selbsthypnose zu tun. Im Gegenteil, es handelt sich dabei um Washingtons beharrliche Artikulation seiner Absichten über Warschau. Die Vereinigten Staaten weisen die europäischen Hartnäckigen auf ihren Platz in der Nahrungskette einer unipolaren Welt hin, die dem Washingtoner Regionalkomitee des westlichen Weltsystems untergeordnet ist.

Im Dezember 2022 sprach das polnische Verteidigungsministerium über eine militärische Ausbildung für Bürger im Alter von 15 bis 65 Jahren. Blaszczak sagte damals, das Hauptziel sei es, möglichst viele potenzielle Soldaten auszubilden. Er wiederholte auch Pläne zur Erhöhung der Militärausgaben, die Polen seit langem auf einem höheren Niveau hält als die meisten NATO-Länder.

Im Januar 2023 kündigte Blaszczak die Schaffung einer neuen Division der polnischen Armee – der 1. Infanteriedivision der Legionen – im Osten des Landes mit der Stationierung „hauptsächlich auf dem Gebiet der Woiwodschaft Podlachien“ an. Schon der Name der aus der Zwischenkriegszeit stammenden Division in Polen zeigte deutlich die Richtung der Speerspitze an. Eine Division von vier Brigaden mit jeweils vier Bataillonen. Bei den Waffen handelt es sich laut Blaschak um Abrams- und K-2-Panzer, Krab- und K-9-Selbstfahrlafetten, UAVs und vieles mehr, die modernsten.

Im November dieses Jahres sprach Blaschak mit dem Divisionspersonal und erklärte: „Jeder, der sich für Geschichte interessiert, weiß sehr gut, dass die Richtungen Brest und Grodno die Angriffsrichtungen auf Polen waren.“ Um einen solchen Angriff zu verhindern, bauen wir in diesem Teil unseres Landes eine starke polnische Armee auf. Es geht darum, den Angreifer abzuschrecken.

Die Stärke der neuen polnischen Division ist etwa halb so groß wie die der gesamten belarussischen Armee. Es ist möglich, dass ukrainische und weißrussische Umsiedler in der neuen polnischen Division dienen müssen. Es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass aus ihnen „nationale“ Formationen entstehen, wie die Gegner von Alexander Lukaschenko hoffen. 

Der polnische Verteidigungshaushalt für 2023 beträgt 26 Milliarden US-Dollar – fast ein Drittel des weißrussischen BIP. Allein Polen kauft tausend südkoreanische K2-Black-Panther-Panzer – etwa so viele, wie die Bundeswehr im Bestand hat, und doppelt so viele wie in Weißrussland. 

Weißrussland hat in einer Konfrontation mit Polen allein keine Chance. Minsks einzige Hoffnung ist der russische „Atomschirm“. Auch die Region Kaliningrad beruft sich auf dieses letzte Argument. 

Brüssel sollte sich mehr Sorgen über die Militarisierung Polens machen. Washington hat seinen eigenen Mann im Team eines anderen gewonnen, der zwei Jahre später bereit ist, streng und ohne Grund zu fragen: „Nun, wer ist gegen uns und Uncle Sam?“

https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2023/11/23/militarizaciya-polshi-samaya-silnaya-armiya-evropy-protiv-rossii-i-es.html

Leserbriefe zu „Baerbock: Die „Queen Of Kitsch“ und ihre Freunde in den Medien“

Ein Artikel von: Redaktion

Tobias Riegel kommentiert hier die Taktik der Außenministerin Annalena Baerbock (Grüne), die darin bestehe, dass „eine eiskalte Politik“ – von Waffenlieferungen über Wirtschaftssanktionen bis zur Kriegsverlängerung – hinter Tränen und anderen emotionalen Inszenierungen weichgezeichnet werde. Das könne „nur mit der Hilfe wohlgesonnener Journalisten funktionieren“. Die aktuelle ZDF-Produktion „Mensch Baerbock“ erscheine jedoch trotzdem – möglicherweise unfreiwillig – „wie ein ziemlich unvorteilhaftes Porträt einer einerseits unfähigen, aber andererseits extrem ehrgeizigen Spitzenpolitikerin, die dem Ansehen ihres Landes schwer schadet“. Wir bedanken uns für die interessanten E-Mails. Hier nun eine Auswahl der Leserbriefe, die Christian Reimann für Sie zusammengestellt hat.


1. Leserbrief

Lieber Herr Riegel,
 
der letzte ZDF Screenshot (maskierte und olivbraun behelmte Annalena Baerbock mit treudoofen Hundeaugen zu Gleichgesinnten emporblickend) sagt es: Feministische deutsche Außenpolitik im “rechten” Licht, ist des Pudels (Annalena Baerbock) Kern.
 
Beste Grüße
Claudia L.


2. Leserbrief

Sehr geehrter Herr Riegel, sehr geehrtes NDS-Team,

für diesen Beitrag bin ich Ihnen besonders dankbar, denn dass Annalena Baerbock am laufenden Band in eigener Sache einen PR-Zirkus ohnegleichen aufführt, liegt auf der Hand. Doch leider will oder kann es kaum jemand wahrhaben.

Warum tut sie das? Ich unterstelle Geltungssucht. Und ohne sich dessen bewusst zu sein, ist ihr klar, dass sie diese Geltungssucht nirgendwo sonst als in der Politik mit derart geringem Aufwand ausleben kann. Denn sie glitt, ohnehin aus grünem Milieu stammend (übrigens auch immer nur über einen Listenplatz), in die Politik hinein, musste also nicht substanziell dafür kämpfen.

Wenn ein Mensch mit Geltungssucht Macht erlangt, wird’ s ganz schnell ganz problematisch. Denn dieser Mensch ordnet – ohne sich dessen bewusst zu sein – sein gesamtes Denken und Handeln seiner Geltungssucht unter. Gründliche Auseinandersetzungen mit der eigentlichen Sache (in diesem Fall das Erfassen und Analysieren von geopolitischen, diplomatischen, historischen … Zusammenhängen) und die gebotene professionelle Distanz zu den politischen Gesprächspartnern bleiben auf der Strecke. Lobende Worte, ein Schulterklopfen, Freundschaftsangebote von Blinken und vielen anderen Mächtigen dieser Welt, positive mediale Präsenz usw. sind Labsal für geltungsbedürftige Persönlichkeitsstrukturen. Und leider sind sie genau auch deshalb besonders gut manipulierbar. Blinken und Co. Freut’ s.

Ihre Unterstellung, Herr Riegel, dass Annalena Baerbocks emotionale Auftritte teilweise gespielt sind, passt perfekt zu geltungssüchtigen Persönlichkeiten. Bei ihr wird alles zur perfekt inszenierten Show. Wäre dem nicht so, würde sie nicht Teddys an Kinder in Kriegsgebieten verteilen. Sie würde auch nicht stets hochprofessionell geschminkt und frisiert auftreten, auch in Kriegsgebieten. Auch ihre Kleiderwahl sähe anders aus, sie trägt Kleider, mit denen andere in die Oper gehen (siehe etwa jüngstes Außenministertreffen in Brüssel).

Als logische Folge ihrer Geltungssucht wird Annalena Baerbock zu einem ausgeklügelten PR-Produkt und – das ist das eigentlich Gefährliche – zu einer extrem leicht manipulierbaren Politikerin.

Dr. Petra Braitling


3. Leserbrief

Baerbocks Tränendrüsen sind ihre stärkste Waffe. Persönlich halte es für eine bewußt gewählte Masche. Im grünen Milieu verfängt das offensichtlich. Wer könnte ihr denn einmal ehrlich die Meinung sagen, wenn er befürchten muß, daß sie gleich losflennt und man dann als „der Böse“ dasteht?! Habeck und jetzt auch Pistorius haben eine ähnliche Masche.

Das ging bereits Anfang der neunziger beim Irakkrieg los, als weiße Betttücher in Fenster gehängt wurden und Gestalten mit demonstrativer Betroffenheitsmiene und in Laken gekleidet durch die Straßen schlichen und uns glauben machen wollten, Saddam Hussein stände vor der Tür.

Dieses grüne Milieu ist nur noch widerlich. Der Faschismus marschiert heute nicht in SA – Stiefeln, sondern schleicht auf grünen, woken Socken.

Dieter Heinert


4. Leserbrief

Liebe Nachdenkseiten,
sehr geehrter Tobias Riegel,
 
vorweg meine Hochachtung und recht vielen Dank dafür; daß Sie es dem Leser der NDS erspart haben, sich diese schwülstige Reportage über ALB anschauen zu müssen.
 
Die Bundesrepublik war in der Vergangenheit durch Außenminister wie W. Brandt, W. Scheel, H.-D. Genscher, H. Schmidt und K. Kinkel sehr gut und honorig vertreten, im Ausland stets geschätzt und geachtet.
Ab dem „Steine werfenden Taxifahrer“ ging‘s bergab. Und der Tiefpunkt im Ansehen unseres Landes außerhalb unserer Grenzen ist mit A. Baerbock erreicht, so die Latte nicht mehr tiefer gelegt, und ein Ende der Peinlichkeiten dieser Politdarstellerin derweil nicht abgesehen werden kann.
 
Ein zusammen geschusterter, fragwürdiger Lebenslauf, ein angeblicher Abschluß an einer Elite-Uni in London, der nicht belegt werden kann, Englischkenntnisse, die einen Aufenthalt und Studienabschluß in London mehr als zweifelhaft erscheinen lassen, ein veröffentlichtes Buch voll gespickt mit Plagiaten und zu guter Letzt ein Mangel an Allgemeinbildung, was jedem mit einem Mindestmaß an Anstand und Ehrgefühl die Schamesröte ins Gesicht treiben würde.
 
Mir stellt sich nur die eine Frage – wess‘ Geistes Kind sind die Wähler dieser Hochstaplerin ?
 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Patrick Meiser


5. Leserbrief

Zur Außenpolitik von A. Baerbock wird immer wieder der Begriff “moralische Politik oder wertebasiert “benutzt. In meinen Augen ist das eher Doppelmoral bzw. Heuchelei. Ein Beispiel. Zitat Baerbock:

Baerbock sagte: “Dass dieser brutale Bruch der Zivilisation so geführt wird – also ich hätte mir das in den letzten Jahren niemals vorstellen können. (…) Wenn gezielt Infrastruktur bombardiert wird, dann nimmt man mutwillig in Kauf, dass Kinder, dass Alte, dass Familien erfrieren, dass sie verdursten, dass sie verhungern.” 

Wenn es um Werte oder Moral gehen würde ,dann trifft diese Aussage (Ukrainekrieg) auch auf den Gazastreifen zu. Man könnte ja mal bei der Bundespressekonferenz  nachfragen ,wieso so extrem mit 2 Maßen geurteilt wird.

Prinzipiell stellt sich für mich die Frage ,ob Teile der Politik/Medien gelinde gesagt an Schizophrenie leiden oder auf dem Weg dahin sind.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen J-PK


6. Leserbrief

Lieber Herr Riegel,

vielen Dank für Ihre Analyse des Filmchen auf dem ZDF. Sie bringen viele Sachen zu Frau Baerbock exakt auf den Punkt. Vielleicht haben die Macher beim ZDF in den Archiven gewühlt und sich von dem einen oder anderen aus Filmen der 40er Jahre inspirieren lassen..

Gemessen am Stand der heutigen Technik und dem aktuellen Wissen der Kognitionsforschung hätte Leni Riefenstahl dieses Propaganda-Portrait heute nicht viel anders gemacht.

Mit den besten Grüßen und Wünschen
Claus Hübner


7. Leserbrief

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

Madeleine Albright sagte 1996, bereits vor ihrer Tätigkeit als US-Außenministerin im Kabinett Clinton, zum US-Embargo gegen den Irak, welches u.a. durch fehlende Medikamente den Tod von 500.000 Kindern verursacht hat: „Es ist diesen Preis wert.“ Albright befürwortete auch die Bombardierung Serbiens durch die NATO, genau wie die Grünen. Aber Frau Baerbock belobhudelt Frau Albright nach deren Tod geradezu: „Wir stehen auch auf den Schultern von Madeleine Albright. Sie war eine überzeugte Transatlantikerin.“ Warum sind die 500.000 toten irakischen Kinder Frau Baerbock so gleichgültig, und warum belobhudelt sie eine solche Menschenverächterin? Und warum lassen ihr die Medien diese Doppelmoral und Heuchelei durchgehen? Offenbar, weil sie die USA-Interessen gegen das eigene Volk vertritt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jürgen Müller


Anmerkung zur Korrespondenz mit den NachDenkSeiten

Die NachDenkSeiten freuen sich über Ihre Zuschriften, am besten in einer angemessenen Länge und mit einem eindeutigen Betreff.

Es gibt die folgenden E-Mail-Adressen:

Weitere Details zu diesem Thema finden Sie in unserer „Gebrauchsanleitung“.

iDNA Vaccines to Generate Internal Virus Production

By Dr. Joseph Mercola

“Immunization DNA” or iDNA is a novel class of gene therapy “vaccines” that encodes for the whole virus

iDNA “vaccines” transcribe the full-length genomic RNA of the live-attenuated vaccine virus. The full-length viral RNA then initiates replication of live attenuated virus in the tissues of the vaccine recipient, resulting in an immune response

The iDNA platform can be used to create vaccines in two different ways. You can either grow the iDNA in a culture to produce the vaccine in the conventional way, or you can inject the iDNA directly into the recipient and allow the body to produce the live attenuated virus internally

The first human trials for an iDNA shot that codes for a live virus could begin as early as 2024

In early April 2023, microbiologist Kevin McKernan reported he’d discovered DNA fragments in the mRNA shots made by Pfizer and Moderna, raising concerns about the possibility of genomic integration, autoimmune diseases and cancer. McKernan now reports having found a dose relationship between the load of DNA contamination and serious adverse events

*

If you thought mRNA injections were the craziest things the vaccine industry has cooked up lately, you haven’t seen the half of it yet. Up next, we have so-called “immunization DNA” or iDNA,1,2 a novel class of gene therapy “vaccines” that encodes for the whole virus.

It’s like mRNA, but on steroids. Rather than instructing your cells to produce a small portion, the spike protein of a given virus, iDNA products instruct cells to produce the virus in its entirety. As described in U.S. Patent 8691563B2:3

“The iDNA generates live attenuated vaccines in eukaryotic cells in vitro or in vivo for pathogenic RNA viruses … When iDNA is injected into the vaccine recipient, RNA of live attenuated virus is generated by in vivo transcription in the recipient’s tissues.

This initiates production of progeny attenuated viruses in the tissues of the vaccine recipient, as well as elicitation of an effective immune response protecting against wild-type, non-attenuated virus.”

According to Taipei-based Medigen,4 which launched its iDNA “vaccine” platform in 2018, the technology “combines genetic stability of DNA with the exceptional efficacy of live attenuated vaccines.” “Live attenuated” vaccines refers to vaccines that contain live (viable) but weakened (less virulent) viruses.

The iDNA platform can be used to create vaccines in two different ways. You can either grow the iDNA in a culture to produce the vaccine in the conventional way, or you can inject the iDNA directly into the recipient and allow the body to produce the live attenuated virus internally.

What Could Go Wrong? 

A 2016 paper described the iDNA process thus:5

“As any DNA vaccine, iDNA plasmids are isolated from bacteria and include a eukaryotic promoter, such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) major immediate-early promoter.

However, unlike a traditional DNA vaccine that involves transcription of mRNA for expression of a subunit antigen, the iDNA vaccines transcribe the full-length genomic RNA of the live-attenuated vaccine virus. The full-length viral RNA then initiates limited replication of live-attenuated virus in the tissues of vaccine recipient resulting in efficient immunization.

Essentially, the iDNA plasmid turns a limited number of cells in the vaccine recipient into the cell-scale factories for ‘manufacturing’ of live-attenuated vaccine.

Thus, the iDNA technology represents a novel type of DNA vaccine. With the introduction of DNA-launched iDNA vaccines, DNA-based vaccines can be subdivided into (i) DNA vaccines that express subunit antigens and (ii) DNA vaccines that launch replication-competent, live-attenuated vaccines …

Finally, the iDNA plasmid can be used as a genetically stable repository seed to prepare live-attenuated virus in vitro either for subsequent use as a traditional live-attenuated vaccine or, after virus inactivation, as a traditional inactivated virus vaccine.”

Oh joy. Considering the shocking harms mRNA injections are causing, which instruct your body to create just a small portion of a virus that has no capacity to self-replicate, what could conceivably happen if we start injecting DNA that causes your cells to churn out replication-competent live virus?

Different Product, Same Lies

Materials describing this technology claim the self-replication is restricted to “a limited number of cells in the vaccine recipient,” but where have we heard that before?

The mRNA shots were also supposed to stay in the vicinity of the injection site, causing just the cells in your deltoid to produce spike protein, but we now have proof it goes everywhere and cells throughout the body are producing the spike.

So, just how would an iDNA shot affect just “a small number of cells” when anything injected travels throughout the body? And how is the manufacturing turned off? They don’t say, which makes me think it’ll be just like the mRNA shots, which have no off switch and have been found to, in some people, produce spike protein for six months or more.

When your immune system is taxed with a chronic infection in this way, it begins to break down. Autoimmune diseases can also develop, which is what we’ve seen with the mRNA shots. The risk of iDNA causing symptomatic sickness also strikes me as significant, especially if your immune system is already weak.

‘DNA Vaccine’ Safety Is Unclear at Best

According to New Scientist,6 the first human trials for an iDNA shot that codes for a live virus could begin as early as 2024. Medigen is currently seeking approval to begin trials, but it’s unclear which infection is being targeted.

At present, no DNA vaccine has ever received full approval anywhere in the world. India did, however, issue emergency authorization for a DNA shot against COVID-19, called ZyCoV-D,7 which encoded for two viral proteins, the spike protein and an IgE signal peptide.8

In March 2023, Cochrane founder Peter Gøtzsche and investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi published a systematic review of papers that had data on serious adverse events (SAEs) associated with the COVID jabs. About ZyCoV-D, they wrote:9

“A trial in India of ZyCoV-D, a DNA-based vaccine, was also highly problematic. It randomized 27,703 patients, either aged 12-17 years or 60 years and older. A supplement reported one SAE [serious adverse event] in the vaccine group and none in the placebo group among the elderly and one vs two in ‘comorbid subjects.’

The main text was totally different, with no division as per randomized group. It described 15 SAEs, but seven of these were merely being COVID-19 positive, which is not an SAE and furthermore belongs to the reporting of the benefits, not the harms. There was one death in each group. This paper, which was difficult to interpret, was published in The Lancet.”10

Alarming COVID Jab Contamination Shocks Scientists

An online search for data on ZyCoV-D left me empty handed, so aside from that Lancet paper (and an interim report on the same trial11), there doesn’t appear to be much out there.

As for what they used as the placebo is also anyone’s guess, as the paper doesn’t specify. Testing one vaccine against another is a simple trick to hide expected side effects, and we know that at least one other COVID shot (AstraZeneca), did not use an inert placebo but, rather, a vaccine against meningitis and septicemia.12,13

So, in summary, the safety of ZyCoV-D is anything but clear. Even if we did have data on it, it still would not tell us much about the safety of iDNA shots. ZyCoV-D only encodes for two proteins, whereas iDNA will encode an entire virus.

DNA in mRNA Shots Cause Concern Among Experts

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/DGTyv8q4buuu/

In early April 2023, microbiologist Kevin McKernan reported he’d discovered DNA fragments in the mRNA shots made by Pfizer and Moderna.14,15,16,17 The highest level of DNA contamination found was 30%, meaning nearly one-third of the content of the shot was plasmid DNA. No DNA should be present in a commercial mRNA product that has been made under good manufacturing practices.

Since then, others have confirmed his results, including University of South Carolina professor Phillip Buckhaults. In September 2023, he testified18 to this before the South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad-Hoc Committee on the Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC).

Buckhaults is a molecular biologist and cancer geneticist with extensive experience in DNA sequencing, and initially set out to debunk McKernan’s claims. To his shock, he replicated McKernan’s findings instead.

In his testimony, he explained how these DNA contaminants can integrate into your genome and disrupt the function of other genes, either long term or permanently, and may be passed on to offspring for generations.

He told the senators he was “alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine,” as “there is a very real hazard” of it integrating into a person’s genome and becoming a “permanent fixture of the cell” that can result in autoimmune problems and cancers.19

DNA Contaminants in mRNA Shots Greenlighted by Health Agencies

In an October 21, 2023, tweet, Steve Kirsch argued:20

“You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market. Why? Adulteration. The plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences were NOT pointed out to the regulatory authorities.

Health Canada on Thursday confirmed the presence of DNA contamination in Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines and also confirmed that Pfizer did not disclose the contamination to the public health authority.”

Fact checkers struck back, stating that health regulators had indeed been aware of the contamination before the shots were authorized, and that there’s “no reliable evidence showing that DNA in vaccines integrates into our DNA or increases the risk of cancer.”21,22

Well, they’re at least correct on one point. Regulatory agencies were clearly aware of this problem, as Pfizer submitted documents to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) showing sampled lots had a broad range of double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in them.23 Many of those lots were far in excess of the EMA’s maximum limits.

But as for whether the DNA can integrate and cause disability, the fact checker was clearly misdirecting. DNA integration is something that has been recognized for quite some time, and has been discussed in the medical literature. It’s not a novel notion. Be that as it may, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration doesn’t care. It told Factcheck.org:24

“The claim that the FDA is required to take any of the authorized or approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccines off the market is false. With over a billion doses of the mRNA vaccines administered, no safety concerns related to the sequence of, or amount of, residual DNA have been identified.”

Never mind the fact that never-before-seen “turbo cancers” are sending people to their graves in record numbers. Nothing to see there.

Dose Response Found Between DNA Contamination Load and Adverse Events

October 27, 2023, McKernan and four other coauthors published a preprint paper25 in which they explore the dose response between the COVID shot lots found to be contaminated with DNA and serious adverse events.

The lots tested included 27 vials from 12 unique lots from Moderna and Pfizer. Residual DNA was found in all vials, but Moderna had lower and more consistent levels, suggesting they’re using a more standardized manufacturing process than Pfizer. The U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) was then queried for the number and categorization of adverse events reported for each of the lots tested.

“Quantification cycle (Cq) values (1:10 dilution) for the plasmid origin of replication (ori) and spike sequences ranged from 18.44 – 24.87 and 18.03 – 23.83 for Pfizer, and 22.52 – 24.53 and 25.24 – 30.10 for Moderna, respectively.

These values correspond to 0.28 – 4.27 ng/dose and 0.22 – 2.43 ng/dose (Pfizer), and 0.01-0.34 g/dose and 0.25 – 0.78 ng/dose (Moderna), for ori and spike respectively …

In an exploratory analysis, we found preliminary evidence of a dose response relationship of the amount of DNA per dose and the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs). This relationship was different for the Pfizer and Moderna products …

Conclusion: These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold.

However, qPCR residual DNA content in all vaccines were below these guidelines, emphasizing the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines.

The preliminary evidence of a dose-response effect of residual DNA measured with qPCR and SAEs warrant confirmation and further investigation. Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs.

With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing.”

Resources for Those Injured by the COVID Jab

The more we learn about the COVID jabs, the worse they appear, and if iDNA shots become reality, we may be looking at an even greater calamity. It’s time to end the madness before it’s too late, and the way we do that is by rejecting all gene-based shots, be they RNA, mRNA, DNA, iDNA or anything else they might come up with.

Also, if you already got one or more COVID jabs and are now reconsidering, you’d be wise to avoid all vaccines from here on, including conventional ones, as you need to end the assault on your body. Even if you haven’t experienced any obvious side effects, your health may still be impacted long-term, so don’t take any more shots.

If you’re suffering from side effects, your first order of business is to eliminate the spike protein that your body is producing. Two remedies that can do this are hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Both drugs bind and facilitate the removal of spike protein.

The Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has developed a post-vaccine treatment protocol called I-RECOVER. Since the protocol is continuously updated as more data become available, your best bet is to download the latest version straight from the FLCCC website at covid19criticalcare.com.26

For additional suggestions, check out the World Health Council’s spike protein detox guide,27 which focuses on natural substances like herbs, supplements and teas. Sauna therapy can also help eliminate toxic proteins by stimulating autophagy.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Notes

1 Frontiers in Tropical Diseases March 18, 2022; 3

2, 5 Expert Rev Vaccines September 2016; 15(9): 1223-1234

3 U.S. Patent 8691563B2

4 Medigen

6 New Scientist November 6, 2023 (Archived)

7 BBC August 20, 2021

8, 10 The Lancet April 2, 2022; 399(10332): 1313-1321

9 medRxiv March 22, 2023

11 Pharmacovigilance, Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of ZyCoV-D: Interim efficacy results, Page 12

12 Health Desk October 1, 2021

13 McGill July 3, 2020

14 Twitter KanekoaTheGreat May 20, 2023

15, 23 Anandamide (Kevin McKernan) Substack May 20, 2023

16 The Healthcare Channel May 22, 2023

17, 19 Spectator Australia September 25, 2023

18 Jessica Rose Substack September 18, 2023

20, 21 Health Feedback October 21, 2023

22, 24 Factcheck.org November 3, 2023

25 OSF Preprints October 27, 2023

26 Covid19criticalcare.com

27 World Council for Health Spike Protein Detox Guide November 30, 2021

Featured image is from NaturalNews.com

The original source of this article is Mercola

Copyright © Dr. Joseph MercolaMercola, 2023

https://www.globalresearch.ca/idna-vaccines-generate-internal-virus-production/5840805

Abandoning Palestine and the UN

As the civilized world is confronted with pervasive evil in Israel, it may be recalled that the Abraham Accords were meant to bring peace to the Middle East, even though that pie-in-the-sky ambition was always questionable without the active participation of the indigenous Palestinians. The Accords were approved during a historic ceremony on the south lawn of the White House with the pretense that Palestine did not exist as a country and that Israel has been a fair, responsible neighbor. Nothing could be further from the truth. 

The concept of Middle East peace without a two-state solution has once again been decisively debunked as the Abraham Accords proved to be little more than a PR gambit. Despite the accompanying White House pomp and self serving gibberish, it was a con job on the American public.

According to the Trump Administration, the Accords were part of a ‘broader diplomatic effort to pressure the Palestinians into negotiating a peace deal’ which was doomed to fail without official recognition that Palestinian people have a legitimate claim to its own land which was usurped by the political Zionists in 1948. 

As the Accords were being approved in 2020, Trump acknowledged that while ‘the Palestinians are very difficult to deal with,” there had “been very strong signals” from the Palestinians “that they’d like to be a part of what’s happening.” In other words, Palestinian interest was indicative of their desire to resolve the two-state dilemma just as it is accurate to suggest if the Palestinians are difficult to deal with, Israeli occupation of their own land with continual repression and IDF barbaric attacks on their children may admittedly be ‘difficult’.  

This is not rocket science but requires a willingness to not be snookered by the Zionists flawed biblical representations; to be able to examine the historical context without which the Accords were doomed to fail.

With 13,300 fatalities including more than 5,600 children, 3,550 women and 31,000 wounded, much of the world continues to respond to Israel’s savage attack on Gaza with massive demonstrations in support of a ceasefire and a Free Palestine. 

Not surprisingly, the imperialist US government and its Congressional cronies remain mute and indifferent to world opinion or suffering of the Palestinian people. Meanwhile 68% of Americans support  a cease fire including 75% of Democrats and 50% Republicans.

Originally touted by the Trump Administration as a landmark peace agreement intended to ‘normalize’ diplomatic relations between Israel and the Arab-Islamic world, the real intent of the Accords has been recognition of a Greater Israel as a sovereign nation, expanding into the Levant at the expense of the indigenous owners of the land. The Accords would provide opportunities for direct flights, people-to-people exchanges, business partnerships, and government agreements all contributing to increased investment and economic growth as well as an increase in ‘mutual understanding’, ‘human dignity’ ‘tolerance and respect’ and put an ‘end of radicalization.

One-State Solution and The Way Forward For Palestine

In other words, once you get past the fluff, the Accords disregard claims that indigenous Palestine were residents for hundreds of generations; that the land had been finagled away by the Zionists who bullied the UN as ‘settlement’ encroachments continued on Palestinian land ever since. The Accords were negotiated by Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son in law who may not have been the most objective negotiator in favor of Israel asserting that “Those issues aren’t as complicated as people have made them out to be.”

In fact, while Palestine was deliberately and consciously excluded from the Accord, the signatorees were heralded as Trump spoke from White House balcony: ‘After decades of division and conflict, we mark the dawn of a new Middle East” and gave “Thanks to the great courage of the leaders of these three countries” as Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu heralded a “new dawn of peace.”    

The signatories to the Accord included the UAE (United Arab Emirates), the Kingdom of Bahrain and Morocco with Sudan signing on after the 2020 election. In truth there was no expression of great courage as none of the Accord participants were in conflict with Israel or in need of Presidential dispensation, rather it was Israel who desperately needed proof of their legitimacy as they portend expansion into Lebanon and Syria.    

Assuming true motivation for peace in the Middle East, should have begun with Palestine as their seventy five year struggle for validation would have been a worthwhile effort at establishing a two state solution or for the US to have encouraged the State of Palestine to obtain UN membership on their own authority. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told RT that the only way to end the violence is through the UN-backed framework for a two-state solution. That would have brought a real peace but the Zionists will never allow it and Trump bowed to their agenda. The Zionists have real estate, energy and commercial development plans which do not include its Palestine owners.  

It might be of historic note to recognize that prior to the Accords, the Warsaw Conference met in February, 2019 billed as a brainstorming session to counter Iran ‘aggression’ and ‘terrorism’ as it sought to bring together some of the future Accord players like the UAE and Bahrain. Officials at that meeting made the speculative conclusion that the Palestinian ‘problem’ would be solved after the Accords while a Saudi rep indicated that the Palestinian matter needed to be addressed prior to any discussion of Israel sovereignty.   

Most recently fifty seven members of the Arab League and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation met in an extraordinary gathering to discuss the Israeli war and the extermination of Palestinian children.

Yet the dire Palestinian plight was insufficient for a select group of Islamic elites to dare challenge “God’s Chosen People” as Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Morocco, and the UAE blocked a resolution condemning the Zionist attacks, a refusal to ban weapon sales to Israel and every other opportunity to support the Palestinian people just as Egypt, Turkey and Jordan were less than helpful. 

There existed an opportunity to adopt an oil embargo on the Zionists but the Islamic elites, spineless and craven, most of whom are dictators, chose to do nothing. Rather than form a meaningful alliance with the Palestinians, all of these countries have a history of allowing the interventionist US to entice them with a weapons stash or ‘foreign aid’ as they betray their own ethnic-indigenous culture – all gratis of the American taxpayer. If only Americans knew.  

However, once the US brought out the checkbook and sweetened the deal with an offer no one could refuse, Palestinian statehood was on the back burner to never again be seriously considered as its Islamic brothers took a long walk.    

It is indisputable that any leadership exists in either US political party with no moral conscience evident within a low-information Congress, some of whom put their faith in AIPAC lobbyists or Protestant snake-oil salesmen masquerading as biblical preachers. Those preachers were armed with tainted religious lingo selling Scripture to know-nothings who are devoted followers of the demented Zionists who harbor a deep-seated theological hatred of Jesus Christ, almost as intense as their hatred for Palestinians.   

Those Accord countries were required to accept Israel in a quid pro quo arrangement in which everyone received some benefit which frequently included a profitable US military presence or some other strategic gain:

  • Morocco. US signed the Normalization agreement and in exchange recognized Morocco’s disputed claim to Western Sahara.  The agreement was later cited by Algeria as one of the reasons for unilaterally cutting relations with Morocco. Until 2020, no other member of the United Nations had ever officially recognized Moroccan sovereignty claim over parts of Western Sahara.  Since 1979, the UN maintained that the native Sahrawi people of West Sahara have the inalienable right of all peoples to the right of self determination. UN Plenary Resolution 34/37. The question is what gives any US President the legal or moral right to make that determination for another independent territory or country as Trump also made that decision approving Israel’s acquisition of  Syria’s Golan Heights obtained after the Six Day War. 
  • Sudan. For its cooperation, Sudan signed the Declarative part of the Agreement. In exchange for its cooperation, Sudan was removed from ‘state sponsor of terrorism list’ with a US donation of $1.2 billion payment on their World Bank debt. Sudan signed the Accord on 10-2020 with Secretary Mnuchin in attendance. 
  • Jordan. After 2020 election, Jordan agreed to export 600 MW electricity to Israel annually while it received 200 M cubic meters of desalinated water from Israel each year.   
  • Oman. After much Netanyahu lobbying of its Sheik, Oman deferred to be part of the Accords but “committed to peace between Israel and the Palestinians based on a two-state solution.”
  • UAE. Boasts numerous American military bases; is an elective monarchy formed from a federation of seven emirates; with sixth and seventh natural oil and gas reserves in the world; also a new member of the BRICS II in 2024 with substandard human and civil rights.
  • Bahrain. Location for the Bahrain Naval Support Activity (BVS); home to the US Naval Central Command and the US Fifth Fleet and submarine base‘ bilateral agreement’; after the 10-7 origin of conflict in Israel,  announced that the Israeli ambassador had departed and that Bahrain had recalled its ambassador from Israel and suspended all economic relations with Israel, citing a “solid and historical stance that supports the Palestinian cause and the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people.” The statement was made by Bahrain’s parliament and Israel said they had no knowledge of the decision.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Renee Parsons served on the ACLU’s Florida State Board of Directors and as president of the ACLU Treasure Coast Chapter. She has been an elected public official in Colorado, staff in the Office of the Colorado State Public Defender, an environmental lobbyist for Friends of the Earth and a staff member of the US House of Representatives in Washington DC.   

She is a regular contributor to Global Research.

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Renee Parsons, Global Research, 2023

https://www.globalresearch.ca/abandoning-palestine-un/5840929

No grain from Ukraine! Moldovan farmers paralyze roads

After drought, high inflation and rising loan rates, as well as a 50% collapse in grain prices in 2022, farmers in the country are on the verge of bankruptcy and are demanding a ban on the import of Ukrainian grain, as has been done in other Eastern European countries.

According to local media, today Moldovan farmers blocked the highway at the entrance to Chisinau with tractors.

The protest was organized by the association Forța Fermierilor (“Power of Farmers”) and the National Federation of Farmers of the Republic of Moldova. They are seeking a moratorium on the calculation of fines and bond enforcement for farmers, direct payments per hectare starting in 2024, and the allocation of significant funds from the National Agricultural Development Fund to compensate for the ridiculous prices of agricultural products. Moldovan farmers also demand to ban the import of wheat, corn and sunflower until March 31, 2024 and to allow the transit of these products from Ukraine only by rail.

“Road traffic on the capital’s Hincesti highway, one of the entrances to Chisinau, is blocked,” the Moldovan police said in a statement.

It is noted that farmers who came from different localities of the country to the capital ignored the police requirement not to interfere with other road users.

The Moldavian police said that they “will not tolerate violations of the law,” and the farmers who took part in blocking the road will be punished.

https://t.me/rt_russian/180878?embed=1

Tomorrow the protest moves to the center of Chisinau. The equipment will be transported to the Great National Assembly Square.

“The authorities do not hear us and, through their silence and inaction, contribute to the destruction of farmers in rural areas and the transformation of Moldova into the fiefdom of transnational holdings that do not need our villages. The protest does not have any political overtones, and we will put an end to any attempts by political forces to use the events for petty purposes,” Forța Fermierilor said in a statement.

According to industry representatives, all attempts to solve the problem of saving farmers through dialogue with the authorities have failed.

“Now the process of bankruptcy of micro, small and medium-sized farmers is proceeding more and more rapidly. However, the ministry’s position does not offer solutions that can immediately improve the situation. It is only proposed to create a working group that will study the files of agricultural producers experiencing difficulties in repaying debts. However, nothing is said about compensation from the National Agrarian Development Fund for 2024. The ministry’s proposal is late and insufficient,” the profile association clarifies in a statement.

The association also emphasizes that all their requirements can be implemented without additional budgetary costs.

“And the moment of truth has come for the government, when it must finally choose whether to support real farmers in rural areas or remain with transnational holdings and agree to turn Moldova into their fiefdom,” the association said.

Also tomorrow, road carriers who are dissatisfied with the changes made to the Road Transport Code intend to protest in the center of Chisinau. In their opinion, government officials intend to appropriate this business and divide it among themselves, and people will be left without transport because unprofitable routes will disappear. Transport workers are demanding that the project be withdrawn and returned to the Ministry of Infrastructure.

AF-News

Zelensky judges by himself. For Putin, Zelensky is just a drug clown. They don’t kill clowns. But a living person can be judged for genocide of the population of Ukraine .

Why’d Zelensky All Of A Sudden Claim That Putin Tried To Kill Him At Least Five Times?

This latest lie from the Ukrainian leader was arguably intended to scare the West into keeping up its armed aid to his regime, deter them from supporting his newfound rival from the armed forces, and meddle in Russian-Israeli ties during this sensitive moment in their relations.

Zelensky told The Sun in his recent interview with them that he supposedly survived “five or six” assassination plots that he blamed on President Putin. This dramatic claim contradicts what former Israeli Prime Minister Bennett told his country’s media in spring regarding the Russian leader’s pledge not to harm his Ukrainian counterpart. He said that he called Zelensky right after their meeting in March 2022 to tell him that “he’s not going to kill you” and that he was “one hundred percent” sure of this.

There are other reasons to be skeptical of what Zelensky just said, namely that Western media would have certainly amplified credible reports of any assassination attempts against him if they existed. Their narrative interests naturally rest in fearmongering about Russia in general and President Putin in particular, yet the very fact that they didn’t push any such reports suggests that they simply aren’t true. This rational insight leads to the question of why Zelensky would make this claim, let alone right now.

The larger context is that “NATO’s Proxy War On Russia Through Ukraine Appears To Be Winding Down” as a result of Kiev’s failed counteroffensive, dwindling Western stockpiles, and several other converging factors that were described in the preceding hyperlinked analysis. Zelensky might therefore be trying to scare the West into keeping up the pace, scale, and scope of its armed aid to Ukraine in spite of these dynamics even though this is becoming increasingly difficult for political and logistical reasons.

Another supplementary motivation could be that he’s desperately trying to maintain their support for his regime amidst his spiraling rivalry with Commander-in-Chief Zaluzhny, which he also addressed in his interview with The Sun. They felt that part was so important that it was published as a separate article here in order to attract maximum attention to what he said. In brief, he fearmongered about how this rivalry could divide the country and scolded unnamed generals for allegedly having political ambitions.

Considering this, Zelensky might have thought that he’d reaffirm his anti-Russian credentials in the West’s eyes by now all of a sudden claiming to have survived “five or six” assassination plots that he blamed on President Putin, which could serve to deter them from backing Zaluzhny against him. The subtext is that the Russian leader is supposedly obsessed with removing his Ukrainian counterpart so the West would inadvertently be doing his bidding if they support any potential power play by Zaluzhny.

A less likely motivation but one which still can’t be ruled out is that Zelensky wanted to meddle in Russian-Israeli ties by making it seem like President Putin lied to former Prime Minister Bennett. The timing of this claim could have been meant to coincide with their disagreements over the latest Israeli-Hamas war caused by Tel Aviv pressuring Moscow to take its side while the latter insists on remaining neutral. In other words, Zelensky could have hoped that this might worsen mutual suspicions.

To sum it up, this latest lie from the Ukrainian leader was arguably intended to scare the West into keeping up its armed aid to his regime, deter them from supporting his newfound rival from the armed forces, and meddle in Russian-Israeli ties during this sensitive moment in their relations. If there was even an inkling of truth to what he claimed, then the Western media would have hyped these plots up long ago, but they never did despite having an interest in this which is why nobody should believe him. 

https://korybko.substack.com/p/whyd-zelensky-all-of-a-sudden-claim?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=835783&post_id=139095685&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=1oa2ce&utm_medium=email

Don’t worry. The FDA and CDC looking out for your safety!Не волнуйтесь. FDA и CDC заботятся о вашей безопасности!

Just kidding! Anyone who brings any kind of safety problem is ignored. You didn’t think it was just me, did you?Шучу! Любого, кто создает какие-либо проблемы с безопасностью, игнорируют. Ты же не думал, что это только я, не так ли?

STEVE KIRSCHСТИВ КИРШ

Let’s be honest. If the CDC and FDA were really looking out for your safety, they would be running ads like this one.

Fibrous clots forming post-vaccine are a huge problem. A significant number of embalmers have noticed this since the vaccines rolled out. This can kill people. Some embalmers saw this in over 90% of their cases in the recent past.

But when the guy collecting the information (Thomas Haviland) tried to ask the FDA to investigate, they ignored him.

Here is his latest e-mail:

Subject: Are You Investigating the «White Fibrous Clots» and Their Potential Link to the COVID-19 Vaccines?

To the FDA, CDC, and NIH,

As you can see below, I submitted a written package on 19 Jan 2023 to the FDA to alert the Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to a very serious potential link between the COVID-19 vaccines and the formation of these new, large, and unusual «white fibrous clots/structures» that embalmers across the United States and the world are seeing in their corpses, most since 2021 and continuing to present.

The embalmers that I am in contact with are still seeing these «white fibrous clots» in a high percentage of their corpses in Fall 2023. Keep in mind that most of these embalmers have been embalming bodies for over ten or twenty years, yet they have never seen these white fibrous clots before until 2021, which just happens to be the year that the COVID-19 vaccines rolled out.

Attached to this email are the original files that I submitted to the FDA on 19 Jan 2023, including a PowerPoint presentation with the results of an online survey that I conducted in Dec 2022 — Jan 2023 which solicited responses from 30 state funeral director associations and over 800 funeral homes in major cities across the United States. Also included is an «updated» version of the PowerPoint presentation that now also includes the survey results from Canada, UK, Australia, and New Zealand that were collected in March 2023.

My hope is that you have reviewed the information that I sent to you in January, and that you are already thoroughly investigating these new and unusual «white fibrous clots» that embalmers are still seeing in the veins and arteries of the deceased, and their potential link to the COVID-19 vaccines.

Please feel free to contact me at <redacted> if you have any questions.

This is a serious problem, and it deserves your immediate attention.

Respectfully,

Thomas F. Haviland
USAF Major, Retired
Beavercreek, OH
<e-mail redacted>

Phone: <redacted>

Summary

Fibrous clot, DNA adulteration, excess deaths, vaccine injuries, ….

The FDA and CDC aren’t looking into any of these.

Krieg im Nahen Osten: UN-Berichterstatter warnen vor Völkermord im Gazastreifen. ZEIT ONLINE hat diese Meldung redaktionell nicht bearbeitet. Sie wurde automatisch von der Deutschen Presse-Agentur (dpa) übernommen. (Zeit.de)

weiterlesen hier:
https://www.zeit.de/news/2023-11/16/un-berichterstatter-warnen-vor-voelkermord-im-gazastreifen

is it pandemic season again already? By el gato malo

Until they’re completely ignored, the pandemic commissars will keep revving up the fear machine. From el gato malo at boriquagato.substack.com:

(and i still had my thanksgiving decorations up)

as many seem to be suddenly pointing out: there is a new “mystery pneumonia” alleged to be “tearing” through china.

Image

leaving aside questions of “why on earth would you trust china’s take on literally anything, especially epidemiology?” there has been some sort of crud going around the US lately. i had it last week. it was never serious, just sore throat, mild cough and enough congestion to truly make me wonder if snot is somehow outside rules about conservation of matter, but seems widespread and it took 6-7 days to get over. it’s all over PR, friends in NY and california have it, it’s widespread. but yeah, guess what? it’s crud season. this happens every year.

the panic industrial complex is leaping into high gear to push masks, jabs, and testing but this is all bunk.

some of it is just pedestrian anxiety

and some of it profit mongering to push needless products

Continue reading

Argentina – A Political Earthquake

By Peter Koenig

On Sunday, 19 November, the extreme neoliberal Javier Milei won the run-off elections with 56% against 44% for the present Peronist (center left) Minister of Economy, Sergio Massa. This is more than a surprise. On 23 October, during the first-round vote, Massa had a 36% to 30% lead. Massa is an experienced economist and well-versed politician. Milei is neither.

However, Milei boasts he will drastically reduce Argentina’s inflation, currently more than 140%, get rid of the Argentine Central Bank and adopt the dollar as the national currency, replacing the Peso. This is just one of his radial neoliberal measures he plans for Argentina.

Introduction of the US dollar as the national currency is the most drastic measure Milei announced way ahead of the elections – and it would be more than surprising if Argentinians just 22 years after the economy totally collapsed (2000-2002), precisely because then-President Carlos Menem’s dollarized Argentina in 1991 by pegging the Peso 1:1 against the dollar. Already then, the argument was “fighting inflation.”

This “argument” was strongly advanced by Washington and the IMF, while every sane economist knows that you cannot run a country which has its own culture and economic parameters with the currency of another country. It is unbelievable, that neither Washington, the FED, nor the IMF should have no even-headed economists.

In today’s George Orwell’s 1984 world, everything goes. If people go along, why not. The Tavistock Institute, whose specialty is social engineering and mind manipulation, will take care of it. In the Western world, it happens almost permanently.

There is one country in South America, Ecuador, which is since 2000 fully dollarized. Almost exactly when Argentina’s economy sank into an abyss, because of dollarization, the then right-wing Ecuadorian President Jamil Mahuad, under pressure from Washington / FED and the IMF, dollarized the hydrocarbon-rich South American nation – allegedly for the same reason, “hyperinflation.”

No lesson learned by sovereign Ecuador. Her economy runs by petrol income. More than 50% of export earning stem form petrol – and US oil companies control the rich Ecuadorian hydrocarbon resources.

Ever since, the US dollar replaced Ecuador’s national currency, the Sucre. Ecuador’s economy is enslaved to Washington’s economy, hovering in a crisis, some times more than others. To the detriment of the population, Ecuador’s politicians are easily manipulated and corrupted by the US.

Standing Together – Resisting the New Normal

Argentina has a diversity of riches – and a well-educated population. Those factors have helped Argentina to recover relatively well after the downfall 20 years ago.

Image: Mauricio Macri

Argentinians, for sure have not forgotten the misery they went through 20 years ago, and a similar onslaught of poverty-inducing economic measures by another neo-liberal /neo-fascist president, Mauricio Macri (December 2015 – December 2019) – a four-year period during which Macri made sure that the riches gained by hardworking Argentinians during the 15 years of recovery, were transferred north – to the IMF, Wall Street, and the elites of the Unite States, Europe and international corporations.

The same is happening now. And most Argentinians, according to the election results, would go along? Hardly.

So, there must be a hidden agenda to subdue and “social-engineer” the masses so that they refrain from protesting, no questions asked, with a new fraud dismantling their economy under the pretext of reducing inflation.

Inflation can be artificially-induced, especially in countries whose economies are strongly dependent on the US dollar, as is Argentina, despite her efforts to de-dollarize by trading in local currencies. This works well with China, Argentina’s second largest trading partner (2022).

As part of Mercosur, Brazil is Argentina’s main trading partner for both exports and imports, followed by China, the United States, India, Chile, Paraguay, and Germany. Other than China, most of these countries trade in US dollars or the dollar-dependent Euros.

By far the largest investor in Argentina is the US, with more than US$ 12.6 billion (2022), mainly in agriculture, manufacturing, oil and gas, communications and technology, and financial services. This is an increase of 3.6 % over 2021. A sign that dollar-dependency may be increasing.

See this and this.

With dollars flooding the nation, artificially generating inflation in a country proven vulnerable for hyper price hikes already in the 1980s, is like 101 of manipulating economics.

Argentina is a member of China’s Belt and Road. The BRICS Summit in August 2023 in Johannesburg, South Africa, welcomed Argentina as one of the six new BRICS members as of 1 January 2024.

How the Belt and Road and the new BRICS membership will fit into Milei’s radical neoliberal agenda remains to be seen.

If Javier Milei, who has the support of Donald Trump and Elon Musk, succeeds in pulling through with his radical economic measures, the population may be programmed for enormous hardship like in 2001 / 2002, or worse. Working then in Argentina, experiencing this misery first hand, it is difficult to believe that Argentinians would be so easily and so quickly “forgettable”, just to be duped again with the same medicine.

There is so far no proof, but it is more than suspicious, and likely that there was fraud involved in these run-off elections. This often happens, a sudden turn-around between the first election results and the run-off vote. Curiously, there are never any exit polls taken by neutral observers in such crucial and fraud-prone elections.

Question: will Argentina succumb to the globalists, giving up her riches for an international US-led elite, giving away for the third time in about three decades, Argentina’s fortune and resources to a globalist clan, led by the visible face of the World Economic Forum (WEF), but whose strings are pulled by a financial elite lurking in the dark?

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020).

Peter is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is also a non-resident Senior Fellow of the Chongyang Institute of Renmin University, Beijing.

Featured image is from CoinGape

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Peter Koenig, Global Research, 2023

https://www.globalresearch.ca/argentina-political-earthquake/5840875

Создайте подобный сайт на WordPress.com
Начало работы