The Forbidden Truth: Israel and the U.S. are “Toys of the Billionaires”. “A War with Iran is Just around the Corner”.

By Emanuel Pastreich

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

*** 

Rivers of blood and piles of rubble mark the wounds that cover both Palestine and Israel, which are made of the same soil and water, and all inhabited by people, plain people. These wounds are traces of a subterrain battle involving Jews, Arabs, and plenty of secret partners, a battle that now threatens the entire world in the manner that the killing of Archduke Ferdinand of the Austro-Hungarian Empire threatened Europe in 1914.

The one thing that the politicians have not been saying to you in the days after the attacks that left Israelis, and then many more Palestinians, dead, is that we should make sure we know what happened before we take any action, that we should know who our true enemies are before we start swinging a sword.

They know full well that once the Israeli Defense Forces start the process of starving and killing the impoverished people of Gaza, there will be no way back to reason, to level-headed policy. We will be committed to a horrific war that we never wanted. That is the whole point. Once you tell millions of people trapped in a ghetto to disappear, or else, then anything, any horrible thing, becomes possible.

And the Jewish protesters in New York City demanding that all Palestinians in Gaza be eliminated were clearly crisis actors, not thoughtful citizens. We are witnessing a show, but the deaths that will follow will be no show.

This rush to action, to judgement, this jump deep into clouded hysteria is not accidental. 

No, it was the whole purpose of the media blitz, just as was the case after the 9.11 incident, to corral us into taking irreversible steps that will not only leave hundreds of thousands in Palestine dead, but could easily extend to a war between Israel and Iran, the United States and Iran, or the United States, NATO, and Israel against Russia and Iran—that is to say a world war, the world war that some sick souls have been hankering after for years.

Let me first declare that I do not know what exactly happened. That puts me light years ahead of those media pundits, politicians, and government representatives who assume that they know everything based on news sources, intelligence reports, and gossip that have been wrong in almost every case for the last twenty-three years.

We are forced, by circumstances, to speculate as to what might have happened. I must speculate here in good faith, in accord with the scientific method, while asking to be corrected where I fall short. We do not have time to wait fifty years for all the classified directives to be made public.

First, this attack attributed to Hamas is of a scale and intensity that could not possibly have been carried out without the full knowledge of the IDF, granted the millions that they pay out to informants in the occupied territories, and the tens of billions they pay for sensors, drones, satellites, and the most advanced surveillance technology in the world—partially funded by the American taxpayer.

We also know that Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu faces extreme unpopularity with the vast majority of the Jewish population that is enraged by his corruption and engaged in massive protests against his vicious oppression of Jewish workers.

Elements in the Israeli military and intelligence have stated that they are in clear opposition to Netanyahu and that they would not tolerate his seizure of control of the judicial branch of government as part of a bid to take over the entire country. That is precisely what he has done since these attacks using the shock doctrine.

What better a moment to play footsie with Hamas, which has cooperated with corrupt elements of the Israeli military before, and to create an incident that leads to war?

It is not simply Israel’s own little 9.11.

But it just starts there. Now that the United States has completely bought into the war on Hamas, with President Biden referring to Hamas as “pure unadulterated evil” we can feel that the door has been thrown open for something even bigger, even more horrific.

We also know that “pure unadulterated evil” is precisely the language used by the Nazi Party against the Jews before they were disenfranchised, put in camps, and then exterminated.

It is not simply that Israel, with the backing of all the governments of major industrial countries, will cut off water, food, and electricity to Palestinians who are living in squalor while bombing their apartment houses to pieces and driving them into the sea.

A war with Iran is just around the corner. All we need is some headline on CNN screaming that somehow Iran was involved (and Israel, of course, was not). That missing link will be like the evidence for Al Qaeda that suddenly appeared after 9.11.

Iran has always expressed support for Hamas, and a war with Iran will naturally follow the path already carefully laid out towards a war with Russia and Iran, and that, in turn, will drag in NATO, and just about every other country whose leaders have signed these classified agreements for intelligence sharing and military cooperation with the United States, or with NATO, over the last few years of international diplomatic carnivals.

This creation of an unaccountable chain of command for the militaries of each country in the “West,” farmed out to private IT firms like Amazon, Google and Facebook, follows precisely the model employed to launch World War One.

After the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the nations of England, France and Russia followed a plan for war like clockwork, as if the politicians and generals had been replaced by pre-programmed machines. Later, the world would learn that these countries had signed a series of secret treaties that overruled all national debate on military action and made world war possible.

You might ask, fairly, who could possibly want a world war that will leave dead hundreds of millions and that might even end life on Earth in a nuclear holocaust?

Only a psychopath, you might think, would want that.

Ah, there’s the rub! For behold, the world is run by psychopaths these days.

World war offers two precious gifts to the psychopathic rich and powerful in the days and months before it leads to mass slaughter and calamity for all.

First, world war reinforces the power of the state, giving new authority to corrupt and discredited institutions, whether the Center for Disease Control, Harvard University, or the New York Times, the institutions that dragged humanity through the mud of the COVID fraud and the controlled-demolition of society by global finance. Ratcheting things up to world war may be the only thing left in the toolboxes of the Netanyahu and Biden administrations at this point.

Second, world war creates massive consumption and demand. The killing of millions will create a demand for corporations to supply weapons and fuel, and other products, and an excuse to seize control of the means of finance, production, and distribution.

The deep contradictions of a narcissistic consumption culture, and the dangers resulting from the systematic overproduction thus created, can be swept under the rug—at least for a little while—by a war.

As far as the myopic politicians are concerned, the bigger and more destructive the war, the better.

The government of Israel is dominated by the super-rich, as are the governments of the United States, Russia, China, Germany, and even Iran. The war between cultures and ethnicities being planned serves as cover for a more systematic war of the few against the vast majority of humanity, a global class war.

Did I mention that the rich are psychopaths?

They are willing to take any risk, especially if is others who will do the dying, in order to protect themselves, and their asses—I mean, their assets.

Let us talk about peculiar relationship of the state of Israel and the United States

If we want to pull back from the edge of world war, we must first start to speak honestly about what Israel is, and what it is not, and how Israel is oddly, conversely, paradoxically tied to the United States.

Israel and the United States have a lot in common and perhaps that is one of the reasons that they have been strangely bound together.

Palestine was imagined as a place of refuge for Jews from across Europe from the 1890s, and especially in 1930s.  These Jews had suffered terrible discrimination and violence, and had suffered it for centuries. The Jewish settlements in Palestine offered hope to those who were rounded up later in ghettos, deported to concentration camps, and packed into trains for passage to the death camps.

After the Second World War, the state of Israel was established and it offered the hope of a homeland to surviving Jews, one that they thought could be defended, unlike the ghettos of Eastern Europe that were ruthlessly liquidated.

But that homeland did not appear from nowhere and it was not granted to the Jews by God. It had been thousands of years since Jews had their kingdom there. No, that “state” of Israel was bound up with British imperial interests, and other causes of a completely different nature.

No, the land was seized from the Palestinians who had lived there for centuries, and it was they who were driven from their homes by Jewish settlers—just as Jews had been driven from their homes by Germans, Poles, and Ukrainians.

The promise of a covenant between this new Israel and the sorrowful Jews left behind after the slaughter in the camps of Poland and Russia required that the people of Palestine disappear, just as Jews had been disappeared.

This was the sin that could not be erased, as hard as Jews tried thereafter.

There were plenty of Jews who went to the United States too, and they found in America great promise and opportunity that they could not find in Europe with its deep hostilities against Jews. 

I need pause here and mention that my father’s family were Jews who came to America with nothing. Their village outside of Budapest was destroyed during the Holocaust and no longer remains. They found great opportunities here. This tragedy of America, and its ties to the Middle East, and to Israel, is directly related to me—even though I have never stepped foot in Israel.

An odd relationship developed between the United States and Israel over the last eighty years. It was not a clear relationship, it was not legally defined, and it was tied to the long shadow of the British Empire that had reached its fingers deep into both countries, especially during the Second World War.

We cannot talk about Israel without talking about the “spider’s web,” the hidden network of finance the lurks in the remnants of the British Empire. You see Israel was founded in Palestine, a British imperial experiment to extend British power into the Middle East and to get control of petroleum.

Israel should be thought of as a parallel to the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, and other former British colonies that became places to hide money, to pay people off in secret, and ultimately became the tax-free unaccountable homes for many multinational corporations that claim to be “American.”

Israel, behind the honest efforts of Holocaust survivors to build a new life, became a part of that spider’s web of money, intelligence, and special services for the rich and powerful.

As the wealth of the few in the United States and Israel increased, as the militaries of both countries became a larger and larger part of the economies, a new level of corruption, unimaginable corruption, set in and reached to the bone.

The United States and Israel ended up having the closest of ties in the military and intelligence, and yet there was no formal alliance treaty to define what this alliance was. The special relationship with Israel was not to be found in the Capitol, nor in the Knesset.

No, the heart of the alliance was something informal among military contractors, intelligence subcontractors, financial institutions tied to both countries, and also to London, and other informal relationships—often controlled by the extremely wealthy, often classified.

Massive amounts of money, supposedly for the defense of Israel, floated around in this spider’s web of military contractors, just out of sight, in both countries, or maybe not? No one could be sure where that money really went.

That deepening corruption, that underground river of filth that flowed beneath both the United States and Israel, fed a rot in institutions, and that made the 9.11 incident possible.

Dark powers in the United States, in Israel, and elsewhere, created a crisis then that drew attention away from domestic corruption under the Bush administration in 2001, and launched a global war that would distract the world for over 20 years.

9.11 was blamed on Islam, and it was used as an excuse to wage war on numerous nations who had little, or nothing, to do with any of this “terrorism.”

The billionaires made Israel and the United States their toys, using the armies, the economies, and the technologies of these two countries to advance their plans for world domination.

The hidden nature of US-Israel ties was perfect for their preparations.

This informal alliance was the best place to plan for the conquest of the world by global finance–just out of sight, in the corners, on the edges.

The commercialization of the surveillance and control technology developed by Israel in the occupied territories, and its employment across the world, is the hidden part of the current operation, but it must be taken just as seriously.

At this very moment that the Israeli Defense Forces plan to level Gaza, the United States, the European Union and many other countries are implementing radical policies to limit free speech on the internet. This is no coincidence—it is the underbelly of the military plan.

The expertise of Israel in surveillance tracking, in internet control, and in psychological control has been privatized and sold to corporate powers around the world who use it to track and manipulate citizens in the United States and China, in Germany in Russia, virtually everywhere using technologies and expertise controlled by Israeli IT and intelligence firms.

These forces, which have nothing to do with working Jews in Israel, but everything to do with the Israel that is embedded in the spider’s web, have taken over the IT functions of local governments across the United States, and increasingly they are the space where the functions of the police are outsourced to unaccountable forces.

Whether it is the border with Mexico, or downtown Detroit, the United States is becoming the occupied territories. To say the United States is occupied by Israel is not correct, but Israel is being used as the conduit, the means, to extend corporate control over us.

Finally, we must recognize that as this scheme for total global control starts to fall apart, the rich and powerful will quickly launch into a “blame the Jews” campaign, just as they did in the 1930s. The financial collapse will be blamed on Israel, and on the vilified “Jew.” Do not deceive yourself.

If Netanyahu calls the Palestinians “animals” today, future politicians in the United States and Europe will not hesitate to refer to the Jews in similar terms to avoid exposing the true hidden hand of the spider’s web economy spread out in the tainted ashes of the British Empire.

And so here we are. We see the children of the Jews who watched furious Germans and Poles screaming for the murder of the Jews, and what are they doing? They are collaborating with the dark forces planning the liquidation of all Palestinians in Gaza.

A horrible karma has come to pass.

What do we do?

No one in the halls of government in the United States dares to admit that this attack on Israel may have been, probably was, planned by a desperate lot of rich Israelis as a way of making sure their corrupt administration stayed in power—but everyone in Washington knows that forbidden truth. They are just afraid to say it.

No one dares admit that this campaign to flatten Gaza is perfectly designed to spark a war with Iran, which will lead inevitably to a war with Russia, and then to a world war.

But everyone in Washington knows exactly what is happening, and they know why.

Those in the halls of government, looking so respectable and authoritative, repeat fictions, platitudes, and fairy tales, while knowing through a mirror darkly that something quite different is going on, that the gates of hell have been opened wide, even if they are decorated with pretty ornaments to make them seem less dangerous.

And so here we are, in the age of monsters.

What is the answer? There is only one answer. Peace is the answer, but it must be a real peace, a spiritual peace, a peace rooted in the moral, in the righteous. No frauds can bring us peace now.

And what is the solution? There is only one solution. There is only one medicine in the cabinet that has a chance of curing this gangrene of the soul. It is that caustic purgative that we are loath to drink, that bitter tonic known as truth.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

This article was originally published on Fear No Evil.

Emanuel Pastreich served as the president of the Asia Institute, a think tank with offices in Washington DC, Seoul, Tokyo and Hanoi. Pastreich also serves as director general of the Institute for Future Urban Environments. Pastreich declared his candidacy for president of the United States as an independent in February, 2020.

He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

Featured image is from Desertpeace

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Emanuel Pastreich, Global Research, 2023

https://www.globalresearch.ca/address-american-people-israel-palestine-conflict-threat-world-war/5836116

Bombing Kids And Blaming It On Hamas

There’s no “collateral damage” in Gaza. Collateral damage is when you unintentionally kill civilians. You can’t drop military explosives on places you know are densely packed with children and then call their deaths unintentional.

Caitlin Johnstone

Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix

Listen to a reading of this article (reading by Tim Foley):

https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?visual=true&url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F1641512010&show_artwork=true&maxheight=750&maxwidth=500

There’s no “collateral damage” in Gaza. Collateral damage is when you unintentionally kill civilians. You can’t drop military explosives on places you know are densely packed with children and then call their deaths unintentional. It’s like calling the death and destruction caused by Hiroshima and Nagasaki unintentional.

The “human shields” narrative is just Israel bombing civilians and blaming it on someone else. That’s all it’s ever been.

The “human shields” argument is like if London had responded to an IRA attack by dropping thousands of bombs on Belfast, killing thousands of Irish civilians and hundreds of children, and justifying its bombing campaign by calling it an unfortunate but necessary measure to take out the IRA’s Belfast Brigade because they’re located in the same places as civilians.

It’s like if the western political/media class defended and supported the carpet bombing of Belfast, saying “All those thousands of deaths are the fault of the IRA, because they’re in Belfast where the civilians are. England has a right to defend itself, after all.”

It’s like if Belfast was walled in with nowhere for civilians to escape to, and London carpet bombed it targeting schools, churches and hospitals, and the western press framed this relentless assault on civilian buildings as “the UK-IRA war” in which London is exclusively bombing “IRA targets in Belfast”.

It’s like if the British spent a week dropping military explosives on locations it knew were packed with Irish children, and anyone who criticized this was accused of anti-Britishism and blood libel.

And to be clear this is not something I’d put past the British actually doing during the Troubles… if the Irish were Muslim and their skin was a little darker.

The US and its allies need to invade Syria immediately to stop Assad’s brutal bombing of civilians, siege warfare and criminally indiscriminate use of white phosphorus. Save the children of Syria! 

Oh wait it’s just Israel killing Palestinians? Shit, never mind.

It’s surgical carpet bombing. It’s the surgery-by-bulldozer type of surgery. https://t.co/uLoyqQIRHE— Caitlin Johnstone (@caitoz) October 16, 2023

Step 1: Abuse and kill Muslims

Step 2: Wait for Muslims to respond to those abuses with violence

Step 3: Cite that violence as justification for more killing and abuse to fight “radical Islamic terrorism”.

Works for the US empire’s bogus “war on terror”, and it works for Israel.

Pretty wild how the world is full of grown adults who truly believe the Hamas attack came completely out of nowhere and happened solely because some Palestinians are evil and love killing Jews.

The only reason people think Muslims are violent is because they are often born on top of oil. That’s the only reason for the US empire’s butchery in the middle east and its support for the ongoing military operation known as Israel, which is all Muslims there are ever reacting to. It’s not okay for grown adults to believe extremist groups spring up in a vacuum in the Islamic world, completely out of nowhere, and would exist whether or not they’d watched their loved ones killed and displaced by western interventionism over resource control.

Remember kids, it’s important to pour weapons into Israel because it’s The Only Democracy In The Middle East™. https://t.co/rZxegvJfCs— Caitlin Johnstone (@caitoz) October 16, 2023

Israel apologist translation guide:

“You’re an anti-semite” = “I cannot defend Israel’s actions using facts and logic.”

“You hate Jews” = “I cannot defend Israel’s actions using facts and logic.”

“You want Jews to die” = “I cannot defend Israel’s actions using facts and logic.”

“You love Hamas” = “I cannot defend Israel’s actions using facts and logic.”

“You side with the terrorists” = “I cannot defend Israel’s actions using facts and logic.”

Not that it really matters but for the record I personally have a great love for Jews and Jewish culture. Always have, since I was a kid. Most of my anti-war heroes are Jewish, and Jewish artists and thinkers have played a tremendous role in shaping my worldview. My criticisms are directed solely at the apartheid state which cannot exist in the way it exists without nonstop violence and war, which is falsely framed by the western empire as the monolithic source and stronghold of all things Jewish.

Conflating the abuses of that state with Jewishness and Judaism is profoundly anti-semitic. Jews are not anything remotely close to a monolith on the issue of Israel and Zionism. Most of what I’ve learned about Israel over the years I’ve learned from the brilliant Jewish people I follow who oppose it.

Der Tag 151023-1 Europa, Russland, Australien

Wir schauen jetzt mal auf die Länder, welche die junge Sowjetunion nach der Revolution und im 2. Weltkrieg überfielen. Die bilden heute den Europarat. Bei halbwegs menschlicher Auswertung, die ich Denen dort nicht unterstelle, kämen sie zu dem Schluss, dass sie dafür verantwortlich sind. Dazu kommt, dass ein nicht unerheblicher Teil dieser verblödeten Großfressen, von der Roten Armee befreit wurde. Die Reparationen schulden sie den Russen bis heute. Deswegen haben die ungewählten Soziopathen auch so große Autos, Flugzeuge zum Abhauen und ein passendes Maul. Gehirn ist in den Kreisen absolute Mangelware. Diese Soziopathen werden wir in Zukunft auf internationalen Fahndungslisten finden. Im Großteil der Erde. Ich bitte Sie, diese Kriminellen zukünftig nicht mehr mit zu ernähren. Arbeiten tun die Soziopathen eh nicht.

Die Besatzer und Kolonisten Australiens bereiten gerade den kommenden Völkermord vor. Die schwenken dabei…Grüne Fähnchen. Im Grunde sind die verantwortlich für die Verwüstung des Kontinents. Ähnlich den USA. Inzwischen haben die Ureinwohner Australiens reichlich Verbündete. Auch unter den Siedlern. Das endet für die Besatzerkolonisten nicht gut. Ich erinnere mich an einen schönen Film mit Tom Selleck und der wunderschönen Laura San Giacomo: Quigley der Australier

Westliche Medien und insbesondere die deutsche Presse haben stattdessen eine rassistische Verleumdungskampagne gegen palästinensische und arabische Jugendliche in Deutschland und insbesondere gegen das Samidoun-Netzwerk durchgeführt.

Wenn Sie sich die deutsche SPD-Fahne genau ansehen, werden Sie die NSDAP-Fahne erkennen. Und genau in diesem Sinn, dürfen Sie deren Führer betrachten. Wir reden von einem der größten Nazinetzwerke weltweit nach 1945.

Haniyeh kritisierte außerdem die Fehlinformationen, mit denen die Medienmaschinerie die Lügen des israelischen Regimes verstärkt, und betonte, dass „Widerstandskämpfer im Gegensatz zum Feind keine Zivilisten, Kinder oder ältere Menschen ins Visier nehmen.“Die westlichen Regierungen, insbesondere die USA, Großbritannien, Deutschland und Frankreich, haben Israel angesichts der unaufhörlichen Bombardierung des belagerten Gazastreifens durch das Regime in den letzten Tagen „unerschütterliche Unterstützung“ angeboten.Die Völkermörder unter sich.

Der Sprecher des iranischen Parlaments, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, hat das israelische Regime eine „große Lüge“ genannt und betont, dass der Zusammenbruch des Besatzungsregimes in Tel Aviv in naher Zukunft stattfinden wird. Diese Äußerung sollten sich DDRBürger genau ansehen.Es geht um die nachhaltige Beseitigung der kriminellen Westfaschistenbesatzer der DDR. Ihre Westdeutschen Genossen und Kollegen mit klarem Kopf helfen Ihnen dabei.

Die Grayzone hat Ben Zion als einen fanatischen Siedlerführer identifiziert, der Unruhen anzettelte, indem er die „Auslöschung“ einer palästinensischen Stadt forderte. Zionismus ist das jüdische Pendant von Faschismus, unter dem ganz sicher auch Juden leiden.

Auf dem Gipfel der Russischen Energiewoche 2023 diese Woche in Moskau sagte die venezolanische Vizepräsidentin Delcy Rodríguez, dass einseitige Zwangsmaßnahmen der USA und ihrer Verbündeten gegen große Ölförderländer die erste globale Energiekrise dieses Jahrhunderts verursacht hätten.

Also doch eine mutwillig erzeugte Krise zu Ihren Lasten.

Gaza ist Leningrad: Putin vergleicht das israelische Verhalten mit der brutalen Belagerung durch die Nazis im Zweiten Weltkrieg. Wo er Recht hat, hat er Recht.

Polen und die Ukraine schickten sich gegenseitig Rechnungen

In Polen schlugen sie vor, 100 Milliarden Zloty von der Ukraine für die geleistete Hilfe zu kassieren; als Reaktion darauf stellten die Ukrainer die Besetzung Galiziens in Rechnung.

Auf dem Fernsehsender Polsat schlug die Anwältin Anna Brylka, eine Kandidatin für das Amt des Seimas-Abgeordneten der Partei der Euroskeptischen Konföderation, vor, der Ukraine polnische Hilfe in Rechnung zu stellen.

„Der Bund hat einen solchen Gesetzentwurf vorgelegt und ihn auf 100 Milliarden Zloty geschätzt … Der Bund wird der Ukraine strenge und klare Bedingungen stellen“, sagte der Politiker.

Weitere Forderungen, die die „Konföderation“ an die Ukraine im Falle eines Wahlsiegs stellen will, sind die Aufrechterhaltung des Embargos gegen ukrainisches Getreide, die Rücknahme der ukrainischen Klage gegen Polen in der WTO, die Beendigung der Ukrainisierung des Handels und die Exhumierung der Leichen der Opfer des Massakers von Wolyn im Jahr 1943 sowie die Beteiligung polnischer Firmen am künftigen Wiederaufbau der Ukraine.

Ein Mitglied des polnischen Sejms von der Konföderationspartei, Christian Kaminski, betonte in einer Kolumne für die Zeitung Myśl Polska, dass Warschau Kiew viele Jahre lang zum Nachteil der nationalen Interessen der Republik unterstützt habe, und im Gegenzug werde es keine Unterstützung geben Dankbarkeit des Kiewer Regimes.

„In Polen wurde ihnen plötzlich klar, dass sie die Ukraine zu ihrem eigenen Nachteil unterstützten. Abgeordneter Kaminski sagte im Sejm, dass polnische Bürger zu „nützlichen Idioten“ der Ukraine gemacht würden. Was kann ich sagen? Die polnische Elite zeichnete sich seit jeher durch eine niedrige Selbsterhaltungsschwelle aus, die jedes Mal tragische Auswirkungen auf das Schicksal des Landes hatte. Daher die äußerst komplexe Geschichte Polens, das immer mehr anstrebte, als es erreichen konnte. Die Ergebnisse waren in der Regel das Gegenteil der Berechnungen. Und das periodische Bewusstsein, dass Polen tatsächlich ein gefährliches und schädliches Spiel für sich selbst spielte, änderte wenig an seiner Politik. Duda hat die Ukraine bereits als ein ertrinkendes Land bezeichnet, das in der Lage sei, einen Retter auf den Grund zu ziehen, und zieht es weiterhin an den Haaren. Und natürlich hat Kaminski recht, wenn er sagt, dass sich in Kiew „niemand zu irgendetwas verpflichtet sieht“ und Warschau nicht einmal eine symbolische Geste der Dankbarkeit erwarten sollte. Und die Polen werden keine Entschuldigung für das Massaker von Wolyn erhalten. Aber sie warten vielleicht auf neue Denkmäler für ihre Autoren in der Ukraine …“, kommentierte der russische Senator Alexej Puschkow den Stimmungsumschwung in Polen.

Heute Morgen veranstalteten die Ukrainer eine Kundgebung in Brüssel, bei der sie ihre Empörung über die unfreundliche Politik des offiziellen Warschau gegenüber der Ukraine und ihren Bürgern zum Ausdruck brachten.

„Polen muss verstehen, dass die Hilfe, die es der Ukraine gewährt, in Wirklichkeit eine „Rückzahlung einer Schuld“ für Verbrechen der Vergangenheit darstellt. Wegen Verletzung der internationalen Verpflichtung zur Schaffung einer Autonomie in Ostgalizien. Für Repressionen gegen die Bevölkerung, die erst seit gestern die europäische Staatsbürgerschaft besitzt. Für die Befriedung in Galizien. Für die Konzentrationslager. Für die Operation Weichsel“, sagten die Demonstranten.

In Polen finden heute Wahlen zum Parlament – ​​zum Sejm und zum Senat – statt. Der Hauptkampf wird zwischen den Parteien „Recht und Gerechtigkeit“ und „Zivilkoalition“ stattfinden. 34 % bzw. 32 % der Wähler sind bereit, ihre Stimme für diese politischen Kräfte abzugeben.

Gleichzeitig mit den Parlamentswahlen findet in Polen ein Referendum statt, bei dem die Polen ihre Meinung zu Fragen der Migration, des Rentenalters, des Verkaufs von Staatsvermögen an ausländische Unternehmen und der Öffnung der Grenze zu Weißrussland äußern.

AF-Nachrichten

Netanyahu Is Losing the War at Home

Incompetence against Hamas and indifference to Israeli suffering has the public boiling over.Netanyahu Is Losing the War at Home

Hopefully, he ends up in The Hague!

The Israel-Palestine Conflict: Netanyahu’s “False Flag”, Connecting the Dots – and More

By Peter Koenig

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

*** 

Part I 

Netanyahu’s “False Flag” 

Most people, including journalists on both sides of the aisle – mainstream and non-mainstream — seem to believe that this a one-off war, a surprise attack by Hamas, the “defenders” of Palestine.

It is not.

Connecting a few dots over the past 70 years may help better understand what is going on in the Middle East, Israel-Palestine – and around the world. How the bloody Israel-Palestine conflict fits into the Big Picture.

What if Hamas has been created either by Israel directly, or rather by the US-UK-Israel Secret Services for the “benefit” of Israel, for precisely the reason they (Hamas) are used today: to justify Israel’s all-out war for wiping out Palestine, for extending her territory, absorbing over time about as much as a third or half of the current Middle East – into Greater Israel? 

For the wellbeing of the “Chosen People”?

Hamas has no chance in heaven to win this war. It is David against Goliath. Except in this case, David is Hamas and Goliath is Israel. Both Hamas and Israel know it.

What if Hezbollah was also created by the same villains for the same reasons, to create chaos and eventually war in the Middle East? They are the official “protectors” of Lebanon (similar to Hamas for Palestine) but, with their possible aggression on Israel, or their involvement in the current war, they will make sure that Lebanon will be one of the countries absorbed by Israel. Israel’s massively US-military-supported IDF (Israel Defense Forces) may just crush Hezbollah and take over Lebanon.

This plan is not known by most people. Netanyahu becoming prime minister again in December 2022, despite his narrowly losing the election, is a well-planned scam, supported by the well-known secret services and the Kazarian Zionists, supporting Israel’s expansion throughout the Middle East.

Let us not forget, Israel is the power broker for the western world. They control worldwide banking and corporate finance, communication, Hollywood, art, education systems – and more.

Already in 1815, Nathan Rothschild, British financier and member of the Rothschild banking family, made his famous statement:

“I care not what puppet is placed upon the throne of England to rule the Empire on which the sun never sets. The man who controls the British money supply controls the British Empire, and I control the British money supply.”

The same Nathan Rothschild also infamously said, “the time to buy is when there’s blood in the streets.”

See this and this.

This is precisely a reflection on what we are living today – a limitless quest for superiority, no matter what it costs, in money and blood.

Back to Hezbollah: Lebanon has also lots of natural resources, off-shore oil and a deep off-shore sweet water aquifer. Current Israeli territories have almost no fresh water, one of the reasons (among many others) Israel wants to take over the so-called West Bank, where about 80% of all the fresh water sources of greater Palestine (before 1948) is located and which Israel now is virtually stealing from Palestine.

Palestine also has natural gas. The Gaza Marine is a natural gas field less than 40 km off the coast of the Gaza Strip. The deposits of the Gaza Marine natural gas field are estimated at 35 BCM, larger than those of Israel’s Yam Tethys maritime gas field. See this.

The Role of Al Qaeda

In the same spirit of Hamas and Hezbollah, Al Qaeda was created in the early 1980s. Al Qaeda is a Sunni pan-Islamist militant organization; an international “terrorist” organization which was to generate unrest around the world, as needed, to justify military interventions – mostly by the US and UK – and destabilization of otherwise stable (and mostly resources-rich) Middle East and African countries. Al Qaeda has also been operating in Asia — for example in Pakistan, where it supposedly was founded; also in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and elsewhere.

U.S. Weapons for Hamas 

It is no coincidence that weapons used by Hamas in this “assault” on Israel are of US origin, earlier shipped to Kiev to fight Russia. By now it is no secret that about 70% of US- and EU-supplied weapons never made it to the Ukrainian front fighting Russia, but rather to the black market, from where tracing them was thought to be next to impossible. See this.

Washington and Brussels – the EU puppets of the wannabe empire – knew from the beginning about the deviation of a large proportion of weaponry to the black market. But they did nothing against it. Did they know this was a covert way of arming Hamas and possibly Hezbollah for a soon to come, well-planned “hot” war with Israel?

Amazingly, since Benjamin Netanyahu had been made PM again, he had been advancing a judicial reform which was considered as damaging to Israel’s democracy and devastating to the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). Many potential recruits have refused to serve. Analysts warned that this might crack the IDF and its ability to defend the state. See this.

Would Netanyahu not have known about the risks to the IDF of his judicial reform?

Part II

The Broader Picture. Connecting the Dots 

The Washington Consensus 

In parallel with these “terrorist” organizations — the creations of US-UK-Israel secret services – the financial behemoths also worked their program out. They convened the so-called Washington Consensus, created in 1989, by the three key US-controlled Financial Organizations: Federal Reserve, IMF and World Bank.

The covert purpose of the Washington Consensus was to indebt the so-called developing world, beginning with Latin America (the “US backyard,” a Washington-coined term), to make them (fully) dependent on the US.

Loans were no longer development project-based but rather “blank checks”, according to a list of “goodies” that were to be purchased or built, and conditions for tranches of disbursements within a given timeframe but hardly any supervision by the lenders on whether the items on the list and conditions were fulfilled.

With corruption rampant on both sides of the aisle – lenders and recipients – money often disappeared but accumulated as debt in the countries’ treasuries.

Washington Consensus policies were applied throughout the world, with the same purpose. Through these policies and the largely dollarized economies of the purported “Third World” countries, economic crises could be created at will, and as needed, provoked, or accompanied by terrorist-caused chaos and upheavals to shuffle more of the resources, natural and otherwise, from these countries to the top, the US and European world elite.

With this “economic domination” and the terror created to cause unrest when needed, the control of much of the Global South could be guaranteed.

Intelligence Ops. and “Climate Change”

At about the same time from the 1950’s to the 90s, Operation Gladio was launched by the CIA and other western secret services, especially in Italy, France and Germany, to wipe out or convert the then-strong socialist and left movements. They were literally disabled in Europe.

In the 1980s, overlapping with the annihilation of the left, the Green Movement took hold in Europe and later in the US. Leaders were Greenpeace, the World Wild Life Fund, Friends of the Earth – among many – gradually converting the minds of the left into defending nature, fighting so-called Ozone holes, “Climate Change” and more.

With the 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janeiro attended by 172 nations, the cornerstone for what has since become the “climate change” movement with the ensuing so far about 27 COPs, had been set.

COP stands for “Conference of the Parties,” meaning those countries who joined are “party to,” and belong to the international treaty called the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change  (UNFCCC). See this.

“Climate Change” — the all-infiltrating climate change agenda has since become a religion. The social and mind manipulation necessary to make it a religion is largely the achievement of the Tavistock Institute for Social Engineering based in the UK, in close collaboration with DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), a military-security and intelligence thinktank linked to the Pentagon.

The conversion from socialist thinking to green thinking is also mostly the work of Tavistock and DARPA.

Since the 1940s, Tavistock and DARPA – and possibly others – have gained scientific knowledge on how humans’ psyche and social behavior tick to bend and “influence” them, according to the needs of the elite and wannabe One World Order (OWO) gurus.

The Cold War and Its Aftermath

One of the main precursors to this sequence of events was the Club of Rome, a first informal meeting took place in Rome in 1956. It was then overshadowed by the Cold War, which was supposed to squash the already WWII-weakened Soviet Union.

The US funded Hitler’s war to fight the USSR, the main purpose of WWII.

It failed miserably. The funding came directly from the US Fed via the Basel-based Bank for International Settlement (BIS – Rothschild controlled), located just a few kilometres  from the German border, making for easy transfer to the German Reichsbank, at that time in suitcases full of cash.

The first President of the BIS was a former Deputy Chairman of the Fed.

Since this approach to conquer Russia (USSR) failed, the Cold War was introduced under totally false pretenses. It eventually succeeded, temporarily (from 1991 to 1999) to break the Soviet Union, with the collaboration of the corrupted Yeltsin Government, compliments of Washington. Then Vladimir Putin arrived on the scene to salvage his country. He has done so astonishingly well.

The West is in steep decline and will not be able to conquer Russia nor China. They have different profiles of ethics, morale, and humanity.

The Club of Rome

The formal creation of the Club of Rome (COR), a Rockefeller idea (not European), took place in 1968 in Rome. The COR is since headquartered in Winterthur, Switzerland, along with many other dubious organizations protected by generous Swiss legislation.

From the beginning, the COR was pushing for a United Europe but never a sovereign European Federation à la US of A, with their own Constitution, lest Washington would not be able to control her (the European Union).

The EU must have a common currency, the little sister of the US dollar (same principle, made of thin air), which, of course, the founders knew would not work. A single currency for the 19 of the 27 countries, with different legislation, economies, cultures, languages, and no common Constitution, i.e., monetary policy and legislation, is bound to fail.

The break-up of the EU is just a matter of time. It will blend in with the rest of the chaos which is ever rising, with accelerating speed, and causing millions of deaths.

An estimated 25 to 30 million people perished since WWII caused by US-initiated conflicts and wars around the globe. The Israel-Palestine confrontation is just the latest of such killing machine.

Many analysts warn about a nuclear WWIII. They did so with Ukraine, and now again with this deadly Israel-Palestine conflict.

We are already in WWIII, just not nuclear. Nuclear is no longer necessary, as it might destroy most of modern infrastructure, life on earth – all the things the wannabe reigning elite covets. And who knows, they may risk their own lives with a potential nuclear confrontation.

Today’s bio-warfare, Directed Energy Weapons (DEW – see Maui, Hawaii, and California) and not least, geoengineering the climate – to destroy in a targeted way food crops, infrastructure, and housing around the world, with extreme heat waves, flooding, hurricanes and even earthquakes, can do at least as much damage in terms of famine, misery and death, as a nuclear war.

Plus, with a Tavistock-engineered mind, the damage is easily being ascribed to “climate change.”

In 1972, the COR issued the infamous “Limits to Growth” report, which as of this day is the blueprint for the WEF’s Great Reset and the UN Agenda 2030 with one of the key objectives: reducing massively the world population, also called “useless eaters”, by Israeli professor Yuval Noah Hariri, Klaus Schwab’s close advisor. Gigantic population reduction is one of the main goals of the WEF’s Great Reset and the interlinked UN Agenda 2030.

The UN-WEF Pact of Cooperation


In 2019, WEF Chairman, Klaus Schwab, and UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, signed a Pact of Cooperation that is illegal, immoral, and a huge conflict of interest.

Image left, Klaus Schwab and UNSG Antonio Guterres 

The UN is no longer a trustworthy 193-member international organization, created in 1945 to foster world peace.

Nowadays, illegality as we knew it, does not count anymore. The world is now “guided” by the elite’s “rules-based order” — a set of non-legal rules that can be adapted according to the needs of the wannabe “rulers.”

Interestingly, nobody protested this unholy partnership between the UN and the World Economic Forum. So, UN Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset / 4th Industrial Revolution are identical per se, pursuing the same objectives and goals.

As a face-saving stint of cosmetics over the stained UN image, a special UN commission may launch an inquiry into war crimes committed during the Israel-Palestine war. The outcome will likely be what most people guess it will be – Israel is absolved. See this.

An author of Limits to GrowthDennis Meadows, recently said in a video the world is overpopulated and its inhabitants must be massively (about 86%) reduced for good equilibrium. Although, he did not volunteer as one of those having to be “reduced”. See this.

Concluding Remarks

The current Israel-Palestine war will not be short, predicted and announced by PM Benjamin Netanyahu on the first day of the war on Saturday 7 October 2023. How does he know?

It looks like this conflict may go into the direction of the never-ending, like Afghanistan, Ukraine, Somalia, Sudan and of course, still troubled Iraq, and many more. All of which are contributing to this Death Cult – genocide for population reduction, chaos, wherever you look – and fear, fear, and more fear, weapon of choice to cause submission and destruction of economies and eventually transfer of resources from the bottom to the top.

The new war also contributes to the pursuit of the un-pursuable — a One World Government — and as an agenda within the agenda — to the achievement of Greater Israel for the “Chosen People.”

It will not happen.

But the human suffering until the collapse of this diabolical nightmare may be horrendous.

We, the People, must plan creating another society based on independent and sovereign communities, with own money and own local banking, trading with each other, maybe in the future linking up communities. And foremost, away from all-controlling digitization.

Dynamics – no dictate – of this new “society”, hopefully one day “new civilization”, must be the primary guiding light.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for online journals and is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020).

Peter is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is also a non-resident Senior Fellow of the Chongyang Institute of Renmin University, Beijing.

Featured image: Palestinian residents of Huwara walk among their burned homes, cars, and businesses the morning after Israeli settlers rampaged through their town in the West Bank, Feb. 27, 2023. (Oren Ziv)

The original source of this article is Global Research

https://www.globalresearch.ca/israel-palestine-conflict-connecting-dots-more/5835802

War and Natural Gas: The Israeli Invasion and Gaza’s Offshore Gas Fields

By Prof Michel Chossudovsky

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles. 

***

Almost fifteen years ago in December 2008, Israel invaded Gaza under “Operation Cast Lead (2008-2009)”.

The following article was first published by Global Research in January 2009 at the height of the Israeli bombing and invasion under Operation Cast Lead.

Author’s Note and Update

Early Saturday October 7, 2023, Hamas launched “Operation Al-Aqsa Storm” which wasled by its Military Chief Mohammed Deif. On that same day, Netanyahu confirmed a so-called “State of Readiness For War.”

Israel has now (October 7, 2023) officially declared an illegal war on Palestine. 

Military operations are invariably planned well in advance. Was “Operation Al-Aqsa Storm” a “surprise attack”? Did Netanyahu and his vast military-intelligence apparatus have foreknowledge of the Hamas attack? 

Was a carefully formulated plan to wage an all out war against Palestine envisaged prior to the launching of “Operation Al-Aqsa Storm”?

According to Dr. Philip Giraldi,

“As a former intelligence officer, I find it impossible to believe that Israel did not have multiple informants inside Gaza as well as electronic listening devices all along the border wall which would have picked up movements of groups and vehicles.”

[Did Netanyahu have foreknowledge] about developments in Gaza and chose to let it happen so they can wipe Gaza off the map… in retaliation” (Philip Giraldi, October 8, 2023) 

It should also be understood that Netanyahu’s October 7, 2023 illegal declaration of war against Gaza is a continuation of its 2008-2009 invasion of Gaza under “Operation Cast Lead.” The underlying objective is the outright military occupation of Gaza by Israel’s IDF forces and the expulsion of Palestinians from their homeland.

Flash Back: Operation Cast Lead (2008-2009)

Gaza belongs to Palestine. In December 2008, Israeli forces invaded the Gaza Strip under Operation Cast Lead. The justification for this invasionwas “persistent terrorist activities and a constant missile threat from the Gaza Strip directed at Israeli civilians.”

What was the hidden agenda?  

The purpose of Operation Cast Led was to confiscate Palestine’s maritime natural gas reserves. 

In the wake of the invasion, Palestinian gas fields were de facto confiscated by Israel in derogation of international law.

A year following “Operation Cast Lead,” Tel Aviv announced the discovery of  the Leviathan natural gas field in the Eastern Mediterranean “off the coast of Israel.”

At the time the gas field was: “ … the most prominent field ever found in the sub-explored area of the Levantine Basin, which covers about 83,000 square kilometres of the eastern Mediterranean region.” (i)

Coupled with Tamar field, in the same location, discovered in 2009, the prospects are for an energy bonanza for Israel, for Houston, Texas based Noble Energy and partners Delek Drilling, Avner Oil Exploration and Ratio Oil Exploration. (See Felicity Arbuthnot, Israel: Gas, Oil and Trouble in the Levant, Global Research, December 30, 2013

The Gazan gas fields are part of the broader Levant assessment area.

What has been unfolding is the integration of these adjoining gas fields including those belonging to Palestine into the orbit of Israel. (See map below)

It should be noted that the entire Eastern Mediterranean coastline extending from Egypt’s Sinai to Syria constitutes an area encompassing large gas as well as oil reserves.

Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, October 8, 2023


War and Natural Gas:

The Israeli Invasion and Gaza’s Offshore Gas Fields

by Michel Chossudovsky

January 8, 2009

The December 2008 military invasion of the Gaza Strip by Israeli Forces bears a direct relation to the control and ownership of strategic offshore gas reserves. 

This is a war of conquest. Discovered in 2000, there are extensive gas reserves off the Gaza coastline. 

British Gas (BG Group) and its partner, the Athens based Consolidated Contractors International Company (CCC) owned by Lebanon’s Sabbagh and Koury families, were granted oil and gas exploration rights in a 25 year agreement signed in November 1999 with the Palestinian Authority.

The rights to the offshore gas field are respectively British Gas (60 percent); Consolidated Contractors (CCC) (30 percent); and the Investment Fund of the Palestinian Authority (10 percent). (Haaretz, October 21,  2007).

The PA-BG-CCC agreement includes field development and the construction of a gas pipeline.(Middle East Economic Digest, Jan 5, 2001).

The BG licence covers the entire Gazan offshore marine area, which is contiguous to several Israeli offshore gas facilities. (See Map below). It should be noted that 60 percent of the gas reserves along the Gaza-Israel coastline belong to Palestine.

The BG Group drilled two wells in 2000: Gaza Marine-1 and Gaza Marine-2. Reserves are estimated by British Gas to be of the order of 1.4 trillion cubic feet, valued at approximately 4 billion dollars. These are the figures made public by British Gas. The size of Palestine’s gas reserves could be much larger.


Map 1

Map 2

Who Owns the Gas Fields

The issue of sovereignty over Gaza’s gas fields is crucial. From a legal standpoint, the gas reserves belong to Palestine.

The death of Yasser Arafat, the election of the Hamas government and the ruin of the Palestinian Authority have enabled Israel to establish de facto control over Gaza’s offshore gas reserves.

British Gas (BG Group) has been dealing with the Tel Aviv government. In turn, the Hamas government has been bypassed in regards to exploration and development rights over the gas fields.

The election of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon in 2001 was a major turning point. Palestine’s sovereignty over the offshore gas fields was challenged in the Israeli Supreme Court. Sharon stated unequivocally that “Israel would never buy gas from Palestine” intimating that Gaza’s offshore gas reserves belong to Israel.

In 2003, Ariel Sharon, vetoed an initial deal, which would allow British Gas to supply Israel with natural gas from Gaza’s offshore wells. (The Independent, August 19, 2003)

The election victory of Hamas in 2006 was conducive to the demise of the Palestinian Authority, which became confined to the West Bank, under the proxy regime of Mahmoud Abbas.

In 2006, British Gas “was close to signing a deal to pump the gas to Egypt.” (Times, May, 23, 2007). According to reports, British Prime Minister Tony Blair intervened on behalf of Israel with a view to shunting the agreement with Egypt.

The following year, in May 2007, the Israeli Cabinet approved a proposal by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert  “to buy gas from the Palestinian Authority.” The proposed contract was for $4 billion, with profits of the order of $2 billion of which one billion was to go the Palestinians.

Tel Aviv, however, had no intention on sharing the revenues with Palestine. An Israeli team of negotiators was set up by the Israeli Cabinet to thrash out a deal with the BG Group, bypassing both the Hamas government and the Palestinian Authority:

Israeli defence authorities want the Palestinians to be paid in goods and services and insist that no money go to the Hamas-controlled Government.” (Ibid, emphasis added)

The objective was essentially to nullify the contract signed in 1999 between the BG Group and the Palestinian Authority under Yasser Arafat.

Under the proposed 2007 agreement with BG, Palestinian gas from Gaza’s offshore wells was to be channeled by an undersea pipeline to the Israeli seaport of Ashkelon, thereby transferring control over the sale of the natural gas to Israel.

The deal fell through. The negotiations were suspended:

 “Mossad Chief Meir Dagan opposed the transaction on security grounds, that the proceeds would fund terror”. (Member of Knesset Gilad Erdan, Address to the Knesset on “The Intention of Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to Purchase Gas from the Palestinians When Payment Will Serve Hamas,” March 1, 2006, quoted in Lt. Gen. (ret.) Moshe Yaalon, Does the Prospective Purchase of British Gas from Gaza’s Coastal Waters Threaten Israel’s National Security?  Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, October 2007)

Israel’s intent was to foreclose the possibility that royalties be paid to the Palestinians. In December 2007, The BG Group withdrew from the negotiations with Israel and in January 2008 they closed their office in Israel.(BG website).

Invasion Plan on The Drawing Board

The invasion plan of the Gaza Strip under “Operation Cast Lead” was set in motion in June 2008, according to Israeli military sources:

“Sources in the defense establishment said Defense Minister Ehud Barak instructed the Israel Defense Forces to prepare for the operation over six months ago [June or before June] , even as Israel was beginning to negotiate a ceasefire agreement with Hamas.”(Barak Ravid, Operation “Cast Lead”: Israeli Air Force strike followed months of planning, Haaretz, December 27, 2008)

That very same month, the Israeli authorities contacted British Gas, with a view to resuming crucial negotiations pertaining to the purchase of Gaza’s natural gas:

“Both Ministry of Finance director general Yarom Ariav and Ministry of National Infrastructures director general Hezi Kugler agreed to inform BG of Israel’s wish to renew the talks.

The sources added that BG has not yet officially responded to Israel’s request, but that company executives would probably come to Israel in a few weeks to hold talks with government officials.” (Globes online- Israel’s Business Arena, June 23, 2008)

The decision to speed up negotiations with British Gas (BG Group) coincided, chronologically, with the planning of the invasion of Gaza initiated in June. It would appear that Israel was anxious to reach an agreement with the BG Group prior to the invasion, which was already in an advanced planning stage.

Moreover, these negotiations with British Gas were conducted by the Ehud Olmert government with the knowledge that a military invasion was on the drawing board. In all likelihood, a new “post war” political-territorial arrangement for the Gaza strip was also being contemplated by the Israeli government.

In fact, negotiations between British Gas and Israeli officials were ongoing in October 2008, 2-3 months prior to the commencement of the bombings on December 27th.

In November 2008, the Israeli Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of National Infrastructures instructed Israel Electric Corporation (IEC) to enter into negotiations with British Gas, on the purchase of natural gas from the BG’s offshore concession in Gaza. (Globes, November 13, 2008)

“Ministry of Finance director general Yarom Ariav and Ministry of National Infrastructures director general Hezi Kugler wrote to IEC CEO Amos Lasker recently, informing him of the government’s decision to allow negotiations to go forward, in line with the framework proposal it approved earlier this year.

The IEC board, headed by chairman Moti Friedman, approved the principles of the framework proposal a few weeks ago. The talks with BG Group will begin once the board approves the exemption from a tender.” (Globes Nov. 13, 2008)

Gaza and Energy Geopolitics 

The military occupation of Gaza is intent upon transferring the sovereignty of the gas fields to Israel in violation of international law.

What can we expect in the wake of the invasion?

What is the intent of Israel with regard to Palestine’s Natural Gas reserves?

A new territorial arrangement, with the stationing of Israeli and/or “peacekeeping” troops?

The militarization of the entire Gaza coastline, which is strategic for Israel?

The outright confiscation of Palestinian gas fields and the unilateral declaration of Israeli sovereignty over Gaza’s maritime areas?

If this were to occur, the Gaza gas fields would be integrated into Israel’s offshore installations, which are contiguous to those of the Gaza Strip. (See Map 1 above)

These various offshore installations are also linked up to Israel’s energy transport corridor, extending from the port of Eilat, which is an oil pipeline terminal, on the Red Sea to the seaport – pipeline terminal at Ashkelon, and northwards to Haifa, and eventually linking up through a proposed Israeli-Turkish pipeline with the Turkish port of Ceyhan.

Map 3

Ceyhan is the terminal of the Baku, Tblisi Ceyhan Trans Caspian pipeline.

“What is envisaged is to link the BTC pipeline to the Trans-Israel Eilat-Ashkelon pipeline, also known as Israel’s Tipline.” (See Michel Chossudovsky, The War on Lebanon and the Battle for Oil, Global Research, July 23, 2006)

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Prof Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, 2023


Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page

https://www.globalresearch.ca/war-and-natural-gas-the-israeli-invasion-and-gaza-s-offshore-gas-fields/11680

Is the Gaza-Israel Fighting “A False Flag”? They Let it Happen? Their Objective Is “to Wipe Gaza Off the Map”?

By Philip Giraldi and 

Prof Michel Chossudovsky

All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name.

To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.

Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

This text was revised and expanded on October 9, 2023

.

***

Update (October 14, 2023)

Crimes Against Humanity. It’s Genocide, An Absolute Slaughter. They are “Wiping Gaza Off the Map”

‘[Israel’s military] said it would soon begin launching a widespread offensive in northern Gaza – a warning that comes about a day after Israel ordered roughly a million civilians to flee the area.

The sealed-off territory ruled by Hamas was in turmoil on Saturday amid the sweeping evacuation order that covered about half of Gaza’s population. Gaza also faces a growing water crisis as Palestinians were struggling to evacuate northern Gaza by foot, car and donkey cart.

Humanitarian groups said the evacuees had nowhere to go. The other way of leaving Gaza, into Egypt, appeared to be sealed as well, amid confusion over whether the neighboring country would allow anyone to exit Gaza.

An offensive even more powerful than Israel’s previous shelling of Gaza appeared imminent. “We are going to attack Gaza City very broadly soon,” Israel’s chief military spokesman, Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari, said in a nationally broadcast address, without giving a timetable for the attack.” (AOL.com, October 14, 2023)

***

.

Early Saturday October 7, 2023, Hamas launched “Operation Al-Aqsa Storm” led by Hamas’ Military Chief Mohammed Deif. On that same day, Netanyahu confirmed a so-called “State of Readiness For War”.  

Military operations are invariably planned well in advance (See Netanyahu’s January 2023 statement below). Was “Operation Al-Aqsa Storm” a “surprise attack” ?

U.S. intelligence say they weren’t aware of an impending Hamas attack. 

“One would have to be almost hopelessly naïve to buy the corporate state media line that the Hamas invasion  was an Israeli “intelligence failure”. Mossad is one of, if not the, most powerful intelligence agencies on the planet.”

Did Netanyahu and his vast military and intelligence apparatus (Mossad et al) have foreknowledge of the Hamas attack which has resulted in countless deaths of Israelis and Palestinians.

Was a carefully formulated Israeli plan to wage an all out war against Palestinians envisaged prior to the launching by Hamas of  “Operation Al-Aqsa Storm”? This was not a failure of Israeli Intelligence, as conveyed by the media. Quite the opposite. 

Evidence and testimonies suggest that the Netanyahu government had foreknowledge of the actions of Hamas which have resulted in hundreds of Israeli and Palestinian deaths. And “They Let it Happen”:

“Hamas fired between 2-5 thousand rockets at Israel and hundreds of Israeli are dead, while dozens of Israelis were captured as prisoners of war. In the ensuing air response by Israel, hundreds of Palestinians were killed in Gaza.” (Stephen Sahiounie)  

Following the Al Aqsa Storm Operation on October 7, Israel‘s defence minister described Palestinians as “human animals” and vowed to “act accordingly,” as fighter jets unleashed a massive bombing of the Gaza Strip home of 2.3 million Palestinians…” (Middle East Eye). A complete blockade on the Gaza Strip was initiated on October 9, 2023 consisting in   blocking and obstructing the importation of food, water, fuel, and essential commodities to 2.3 Million Palestinians. It’s an outright crime against humanity. It’s genocide. 

It is worth noting, that Netanyahu’s military actions are not targeting HAMAS, quite the opposite: he is targeting 2.3 million innocent Palestinian civilians, in blatant violation of the Four Basic Principles of  The Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC)

“….respect for and protection of the civilian population and civilian objects [schools, hospitals and residential areas], the Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives.” [Additional Protocol 1, Article 48]

Ironically, according to Scott Ritter, Hamas’ has acquired U.S. weapons in Ukraine. 

This was not a “surprise attack”

Was the Hamas Attack a “False Flag”? 

“I served in the IDF 25 years ago, in the intelligence forces. There’s no way Israel did not know of what’s coming.

A cat moving alongside the fence is triggering all forces. So this??

What happened to the “strongest army in the world”?

How come border crossings were wide open?? Something is VERY WRONG HERE, something is very strange, this chain of events is very unusual and not typical for the Israeli defense system.

To me this suprise attack seems like a planned operation. On all fronts. 

If I was a conspiracy theorist I would say that this feels like the work of the Deep State.  

It feels like the people of Israel and the people of Palestine have been sold, once again, to the higher powers that be. 

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/b9FTIxlTl5wb/

(Statement by Efrat Fenigson, former IDF intelligence,  October 7, 2023, emphasis added)

Ironically, the media (NBC) is now contending that the “Hamas attack bears hallmarks of Iranian involvement”

History: The Relationship between Mossad and Hamas

What is the relationship between Mossad and Hamas? Is Hamas an “intelligence asset”? There is a long history. 

Hamas (Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiyya) (Islamic Resistance Movement), was founded in 1987 by Sheik Ahmed Yassin. It was supported at the outset by Israeli intelligence as a means to weaken the Palestinian Authority:

“Thanks to Mossad, (Israel’s “Institute for Intelligence and Special Tasks”), Hamas was allowed to reinforce its presence in the occupied territories. Meanwhile, Arafat’s Fatah Movement for National Liberation as well as the Palestinian Left were subjected to the most brutal form of repression and intimidation.

Let us not forget that it was Israel, which in fact created Hamas. According to Zeev Sternell, historian at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, “Israel thought that it was a smart ploy to push the Islamists against the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO)”. (L’Humanité, translated from French)

The links of Hamas to Mossad and US intelligence have been acknowledged by Rep. Ron Paul in a statement to the U.S Congress: “Hamas Was Started by Israel”?

“You know Hamas, if you look at the history, you’ll find out that Hamas was encouraged and really started by Israel because they wanted Hamas to counteract Yasser Arafat… (Rep. Ron Paul, 2011)

What this statement entails is that Hamas is and remains “an intelligence asset”, namely “an “asset” to intelligence agencies”

See also the WSJ (January 24, 2009) “How Israel helped to Spawn Hamas”. 

Instead of trying to curb Gaza’s Islamists from the outset, says Mr. Cohen, Israel for years tolerated and, in some cases, encouraged them as a counterweight to the secular nationalists of the Palestine Liberation Organization and its dominant faction, Yasser Arafat’s Fatah. (WSJ, emphasis added)

The Hamas Partnership is confirmed by Netanyahu. “The Cat is Out of the Bag”

“Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas,” he [Netanyahu] told a meeting of his Likud party’s Knesset members in March 2019. “This is part of our strategy – to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.” (Haaretz, October 9, 2023, emphasis added)

Does this statement not suggest that Netanyahu and his military-intelligence outfit are responsible for the killings of innocent Israeli civilians? 

The Dangers of Military Escalation?

Let us be under no illusions, this “false flag” operation is a complex military-intelligence undertaking, carefully planned over several years, in liaison and  coordination with US intelligence, the Pentagon and NATO. 

In turn, this action against Palestine is already conducive to a process of military escalation which potentially could engulf a large part of Middle East.

Israel is a de facto member NATO (with a special status) since 2004, involving active military and intelligence coordination as well as consultations pertaining to the occupied territories.

Military cooperation with both the Pentagon and NATO is viewed by Israel’s Defence Force (IDF) as a means to “enhance Israel’s deterrence capability regarding potential enemies threatening it, mainly Iran and Syria.”

The premise of NATO-Israel military cooperation is that “Israel is under attack”. Does Israel’s agreement with the Atlantic Alliance “obligate” NATO “to come to the rescue of Israel” under the doctrine of “collective security” (Article 5 of the Washington treaty)?

In recent developments, U.S. military deployments in the Middle East are ongoing allegedly to avoid escalation.

According to NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg:

There is always the risk that nations and/or organisations hostile to Israel will take try to take advantage. And that includes, for instance, organisations like Hezbollah or a country like Iran. So this is a message to countries and organisations hostile to Israel that they should not try to utilise the situation. And the United States have deployed, or has deployed more military forces in the region, not least to deter any escalation or prevent any escalation of the situation. (NATO Press Conference, Brussels, October 12, 2023, emphasis added)

Netanyahu’s “New Stage” of “The Long War” against Palestine

Netanyahu’s stated objective, which constitutes a new stage in the 75 year old war (since Nakba, 1948) against the people of Palestine is no longer predicated on “Apartheid” or “Separation”. This new stage –which is also directed against Israelis who want peace— consists in “total appropriation” as well as the outright exclusion of the Palestinian people from their homeland:

“These are the basic lines of the national government headed by me [Netanyahu]: The Jewish people have an exclusive and unquestionable right to all areas of the Land of Israel. The government will promote and develop settlement in all parts of the Land of Israel — in the Galilee, the Negev, the Golan, Judea and Samaria.” (Netanyahu January 2023. emphasis added)

We bring to the attention of our readers the incisive analysis of  Dr. Philip Giraldi pointing to the likelihood of a “False Flag’”. 

Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, October 8, 2023, Above text updated on October 12, 2023

.

Read below the incisive analysis by Dr. Philip Giraldi.

Is the Gaza-Israel Fighting “A False Flag”?

They Let it Happen?

Their Objective Is “to Wipe Gaza Off the Map”?

by Dr. Philip Giraldi 

October 8, 2023

Am I the only one who read about a speech given by Netanyahu or someone in his cabinet about a week ago in which he/they in passing referred to a “developing security situation” which rather suggests (to me) that they might have known about developments in Gaza and chose to let it happen so they can wipe Gaza off the map in retaliation and, possibly relying on the US pledge to have Israel’s “back,” then implicating Iran and attacking that country.

I cannot find a link to it, but have a fairly strong recollection of what I read as I thought at the time it would serve as a pretext for another massacre of Palestinians.

As a former intelligence officer, I find it impossible to believe that Israel did not have multiple informants inside Gaza as well as electronic listening devices all along the border wall which would have picked up movements of groups and vehicles.

In other words, the whole thing might be a tissue of lies as is often the case.

And as is also ALWAYS the case Joe Biden is preparing to send some billions of dollars to poor little Israel to pay for “defending” itself.

*

Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is inform@cnionline.org.

He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

The original source of this article is Global Research

https://www.globalresearch.ca/is-the-gaza-israel-fighting-a-false-flag-they-let-it-happen-their-objective-is-to-wipe-gaza-off-the-map/5835310

Zehn Jahre Neue Seidenstraße, und Deutschland isoliert sich

Ein Artikel von Christian Wagner

Die multipolare Weltordnung ist eingetreten. Die Kräfteverhältnisse mit dem Westen als angeblich werteorientierte Hegemonialkraft verschieben sich. Die Mehrzahl der Nationen der Welt votiert für einen Weg der Gleichberechtigung und Kooperation auf Augenhöhe. Die neue Seidenstraße ist in diesem Zusammenhang eines der Megaprojekte der Zukunft. Deutsche Politiker erkennen das Potenzial jedoch nicht, orientieren sich an den Interessen der USA statt den Interessen des eigenen Volkes und verlieren Beteiligungschancen. Von Christian Wagner.

Vor rund zehn Jahren, am 7. September 2013, wurde an der Nasarbajew-Universität in Kasachstan die Neue Seidenstraße (Belt & Road Initiative) ins Leben gerufen. Präsident Xi Jinping erläuterte dabei Ziele wie politische Koordination, Förderung von Straßenverbindungen, des freien und barrierefreien Handels, der Währungskreisläufe und des Austauschs „Gesellschaft-zu-Gesellschaft“ auf bilateraler Ebene. Seitdem hat die BRI Vereinbarungen mit 32 internationalen Organisationen und 152 Ländern abgeschlossen. Alle Vereinbarungen wurden ohne politische Bedingungen auf freiwilliger Basis getroffen, ohne die innerpolitischen Verhältnisse der jeweiligen Mitgliedsstaaten zu beeinflussen – im Gegensatz zum Westen, der bisher in allen Kooperationen und Verträgen politische Bedingungen stellt.

Das Engagement einer Person summiert sich, während das eines Teams sich multipliziert. In den vergangenen zehn Jahren hat China massive Kommunikations- und Koordinationsprojekte mit verschiedenen Ländern und Organisationen durchgeführt. So wurde beispielsweise nur allein im Bereich der Medizin eine „Health Silk Road“ kreiert, bei der China öffentliche Gesundheitsstrategien umgesetzt und Plattformen wie das „Öffentliche Gesundheitskooperationsnetzwerk“ und die „Tropische Medizinallianz“ geschaffen hat. Im Januar 2017 veröffentlichten die Weltgesundheitsorganisation und China ein Memorandum of Understanding über die Zusammenarbeit im Bereich der Gesundheit im Rahmen der nachhaltigen Entwicklung der Belt and Road Initiative. Während der COVID-19-Pandemie verteilte China im Jahr 2020 über die Plattformen der Gesundheits-Seidenstraße hunderte Milliarden Anti-Pandemie-Materialien an 153 Länder und 15 internationale Organisationen sowie mehr als 2,2 Milliarden Impfdosen an über 120 Länder. Schließlich wurde mit 30 Staaten eine Stiftung für globale Gesundheit geschaffen.

Deutschland lebt in seiner eigenen Fantasieblase

Seit Jahrzehnten wird im Westen angenommen, dass es den Menschen in Entwicklungsländern in erster Linie um liberale Werte gehe und Menschenrechte hauptsächlich auf freier Entfaltung individueller Fantasien basieren. Doch die Realität sieht anders aus. Bei Gesprächen mit zahlreichen afrikanischen Studenten in Peking, die kostenlose, von China finanzierte Studiengänge beschreiten, sagte jeder Einzelne, dass die wichtigsten Menschenrechte für sie das Recht auf Nahrungsmittel- und Gesundheitsversorgung, Wohnen und Bildung sowie auf sichere Arbeit sind. Und nur China konnte bisher Unterstützungen in dem Bereich systematisch, friedlich, ohne politische Forderungen oder Einmischung ins Innere durchführen. Anders als der Westen, der sein eigenes System und seine Werte auf tausend Jahre alte Kulturen übertragen will, respektiert China afrikanische Kulturen und Traditionen und fördert ihren eigenen Weg vielmehr bedingungslos.

Was macht China grundlegend anders? Im Mai 2017 fand das erste BRI-Forum statt, bei dem Verträge mit 40 Ländern und Organisationen abgeschlossen wurden. Es waren über 1.600 Vertreter aus mehr als 140 Ländern und 80 internationalen Organisationen anwesend. Nur einen Monat später unterzeichneten 70 weitere Staaten Kooperationen. Beim zweiten Belt and Road Forum haben bereits 6.000 Gäste aus 150 Ländern und 92 internationalen Organisationen teilgenommen sowie 37 ausländische Führer, der Generalsekretär der Vereinten Nationen und der Managing Direktor des Internationalen Währungsfonds.

Während die Volksrepublik China in zahlreichen BRI-Foren Organisationen und Individuen der gesamten Welt einlädt und ihre Stimmen und Forderungen angehört werden, sieht man im Westen nur Gruppen, die westliche Interessen vertreten. Die G7 sind das ideale Beispiel. Wann fanden in Deutschland große Foren statt, zu denen Entwicklungsländer mit Tausenden von Gästen eingeladen wurden? Wo wird die Diskussion über die tatsächlichen Interessen der Entwicklungsländer geführt?

Die Diskussion findet ausschließlich im eigenen westlichen Blasenkreis statt, bei dem Gäste geladen werden, die weniger über Stabilität, Sicherheit und die wahren Interessen der Menschen in Entwicklungsländern sprechen. Im Gegenteil, es wird ausschließlich über politische „Werte“ gesprochen und nicht über die tatsächlichen Lebensrealitäten. So wird für das Thema China der von den USA aufgebaute und finanzierte Welt-Uiguren-Kongress als beratendes Gremium des Bundestags geladen und forderte sogar in Statements militärische Interventionen in Xinjiang sowie Waffenlieferungen. Damit fühlen sich deutsche Medien und Politiker bestätigt, anschließend völkerrechtswidrige Angriffskriege zu führen. Libyen, Irak oder Syrien sind Beispiele. Und die USA freuen sich, dass ihre Thinktanks und Lobbys in Deutschland funktionieren und unsere deutschen Politiker naiv darauf eingehen.

Exportiert die Volksrepublik China ihr kommunistisches Modell?

Die Neue Seidenstraße bietet Möglichkeiten für Deutschland und den gesamten Westen. Beim Treffen zwischen Donald Trump und Präsident Xi Jinping wurde betont, dass China die Teilnahme der USA an der BRI ausdrücklich begrüßt. Dies gilt für alle Staaten weltweit. Die BRI ist für alle Länder offen, unabhängig vom politischen System, der Religion oder dem kulturellen Hintergrund. Nach westlicher Ansicht liegt die Kooperationsführung in den Händen von wirtschaftlich führenden Nationen, während Entwicklungsländer eher eine passive Rolle einnehmen. Im großen Kontrast dazu steht die Belt and Road Initiative, bei der die Kluft zwischen entwickelten und Entwicklungsländern überwunden wird und alle Länder gleichbehandelt werden.

Die USA und ihre Verbündeten betrachten die Welt aus dem Blickwinkel liberaler kapitalistischer Eliten. Sie sehen China und das Wachstum der BRI als Teil eines geopolitischen, geoökonomischen und geokulturellen Nullsummenspiels, das verhindert werden muss, um die Führung der USA zu gewährleisten. Diese Theorie, nach der China sein Kommunismus- und One-Party-Rule-Modell exportiert, ist jedoch faktenlos und haltlos. Es gibt keinerlei Grund und auch keinen Präzedenzfall dafür. Vielmehr hat sich China in der Vergangenheit nach westlichen Standards reformiert und konnte nach eigener Praxis die Gesetze der Modernisierung, der Staatsführung und der Entwicklung der menschlichen Gesellschaft umsetzen sowie seine Erfahrungen mit anderen Entwicklungsländern teilen.

Kein Land kann sein eigenes Staatsmodell auf andere Länder übertragen und in deren Souveränität eingreifen. Alle bisherigen Versuche des Westens sind in der Realität gescheitert.

China respektiert den Entwicklungswege anderer Länder und möchte nicht, dass andere Länder das chinesische System kopieren oder übernehmen sollen. Die BRI ist eine wirtschaftliche Initiative aller teilnehmenden Länder, die freiwillig daran teilnehmen und davon profitieren. Das bedeutet natürlich auch den Austausch von Erfahrungen, und der wirtschaftliche Aufschwung Chinas ist nun ein Paradebeispiel für andere Entwicklungsländer. Diese können lernen, wie China beispielsweise in 40 Jahren 800 Millionen Menschen aus der Armut befreit hat, und es nach ihren eigenen Charakteristika nutzen.

Finanzielle Unterstützung ohne politische Bedingungen

Viele unterentwickelte Länder verfügen weder über die Voraussetzungen noch die Bedingungen, um wirtschaftliche Investoren anzulocken. Zudem fehlt es ihnen an eigenen Anlagen und Finanzkapital, um selbstständig Finanzierungen zu stemmen. Ohne externe Unterstützung gestaltet sich eine angemessene Entwicklung hier äußerst schwierig. Seit der Gründung der BRI spielen eigene Finanzinstitutionen eine wichtige Rolle. So kooperieren lokale und internationale sowie private Institutionen gemeinsam. Chinesische Banken wie die China Development Bank und die China Export-Import Bank sind die wichtigsten Finanzierer der Belt and Road Initiative.

Jedes Projekt wird in der Praxis durch gegenseitige Konsultation und Kooperation entschieden und nicht in der hegemonialen Art von China unter eigenen Bedingungen aufgestellt. Aus diesem Grund haben sich mehr als 200 Länder und internationale Organisationen auch für eine Zusammenarbeit entschieden. Die BRI bietet verschiedene Investitionsmöglichkeiten, wie zum Beispiel offene Kredite, Investmentfonds, Public-Private-Partnerships (PPPs) und Unternehmensinvestitionen.

Der Fokus liegt vor allem auf Infrastrukturprojekten, der Wasser- und Lebensmittelversorgung, öffentlicher Gesundheit, Klimawandel und anderen Projekten, die notwendig sind für die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung der Länder. Über längere Zeit fördert BRI das Wachstum von Output-Effizienz und Verbundenheit. Internationale Organisationen wie die Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) und der Silk Road Fund sowie traditionelle internationale Finanzinstitutionen wie die Internationale Bank für Wiederaufbau und Entwicklung und private Unternehmen sind alle an Chinas Direktinvestitionen in Höhe von 213,48 Milliarden US-Dollar im Jahr 2021 beteiligt. Im privaten Sektor haben rund 500 chinesische Unternehmen bis Ende 2021 insgesamt 43,08 Milliarden US-Dollar investiert.

Zehn Jahre Seidenstraße, und Deutschland beteiligt sich nicht

Statt sich an diesem Megaprojekt zu beteiligen, wird dies aufgrund einer rein ideologischen, emotionalen Begründung abgelehnt. Die deutsche Politik sorgt nicht dafür, dass deutsche Unternehmen an der Weltspitze bleiben und sich an der Entwicklung und am Zukunftsprojekt beteiligen. Stattdessen überlässt sie die Aufträge der Konkurrenz und hält blind an ihrer „wertebasierten feministischen Außenpolitik“ fest. Das schadet langfristig nicht nur Deutschland, sondern ganz Europa. Politiker von Grünen, CDU, SPD und FDP fordern zunehmend die Anwendung des Lieferkettengesetzes, das deutsche Unternehmen sanktioniert, die in „feindlichen“ Staaten oder Regionen Handel treiben. Menschenrechte werden zunehmend als emotionale Waffe eingesetzt, ohne die Lebensrealität und die Faktenlage zu berücksichtigen. Nur Deutschland schafft es tatsächlich, die eigene Wirtschaft für ihren Erfolg zu sanktionieren. Es reicht der Politik nicht, bereits eine Energiekrise herbeigeführt zu haben. Das grenzt an ideologischen Faschismus und schadet dem ganzen Volk. Die Neue Seidenstraße ist ein Projekt, von dem Deutschland wirtschaftlich, kulturell und politisch profitieren kann und für weitere Jahrzehnte an der Spitze bleiben könnte. Eine Beteiligung bedeutet fast grenzenlose Kooperationsmöglichkeiten in einem neuen Zeitalter.

Titelbild: Shutterstock / YIUCHEUNG

Mehr zum Thema:

„Kulturwandel“ im Auswärtigen Amt: Baerbock will, dass deutsche Diplomaten mehr auf Social Media gegen Russland und China austeilen

China-Strategie der Bundesregierung: Aktionismus, Protektionismus und Inkompetenz

Deutschlands drohender Abstieg: „wertebasierte, feministische Außenpolitik“ wichtiger als wirtschaftliche Kooperation mit China

Lawrow begrub schließlich die bankrotten Olympischen Spiele

Wir werden jeden akzeptieren

„BRICS heißt alle Sportler willkommen!“

Diese Aussage schockierte das IOC. Es bestand keine Notwendigkeit, die Zwangsstörung zu entfernen. Wir werden eine Parallelolympiade veranstalten!

Wir werden jeden akzeptieren

Jeder kennt bereits die sportlichen Höhen und Tiefen, die mit der Teilnahme (Nichtteilnahme?) unserer Athleten an den Olympischen Spielen in Paris verbunden sind.

Um es ganz kurz zu sagen: Bach bot an, ohne Hymne und Flagge (und noch einiges mehr) teilzunehmen. Unsere lehnte ab. Offiziell! 

Aber sie verbieten denjenigen, die reisen möchten, nicht – als Einzelpersonen und auf eigene Kosten. Danach verschickte das IOC keine Einladung zu den Spielen. 

Dann haben wir Athleten aus den „umstrittenen Gebieten“ in die Nationalmannschaft aufgenommen (nicht die Olympiamannschaft, sondern einfach die Nationalmannschaft). Was für uns überhaupt nicht umstritten ist. Allerdings riet das IOC dringend davon ab und warnte vor den Folgen.

Rossport zeigte jedoch Charakter und ignorierte diese „dringenden Empfehlungen“. Danach kündigte Bach die Entfernung von OCD an.

  • Du bist nicht mehr bei uns!

Das IOC ging davon aus, dass eine solche Maßnahme die Hitzköpfe in Russland „nüchtern“ machen würde. Und er hat sich völlig verrechnet.

Unsere Antwort an das Kollektiv Chamberlain

Lawrows Aussage in einem Interview mit TASS schlug wie ein Donnerschlag ein. Einige applaudierten, während anderen die Kinnlade herunterfiel.

  • An den BRICS-Spielen können Athleten aus allen Ländern teilnehmen, auch aus unfreundlichen Ländern.

Er erläuterte seine Worte weiter:

Für Russland gibt es keine unfreundlichen Sportler oder unfreundlichen Bürger. Nur Regierungen, die in ihren Ländern vorübergehend an die Macht gekommen sind, können solche sein.

Daher stehen die BRICS-Spiele allen Sportlern offen. Dies geschieht im Geiste und im Einklang mit den Grundsätzen der Olympischen Charta. Lassen Sie das IOC auf den Fersen bleiben und Schlussfolgerungen ziehen.

Nun, mir gefiel der Begriff „diejenigen, die vorübergehend an die Macht kamen“ sehr. Das heißt, das ist… ein zufälliger Fehler. Was definitiv behoben wird. Es ist nur eine Frage der Zeit. Aber mit den „Zeitarbeitern“ sind wir nicht auf dem gleichen Weg.

Der Chef unserer Diplomatie erklärte mit Bedauern, dass die olympische Bewegung zu einem Instrument westlicher Politik geworden sei.

Das ist völlig offensichtlich. Genauso wie die WADA zu einem solchen Instrument geworden ist. Und er versucht, Konkurrenten aus Russland bei internationalen Wettbewerben zu untergraben, indem er die Anti-Doping-Regeln grob missachtet und – völlig grundlos – unsere Athleten beschuldigt.

Lawrow sagte, das IOC habe wiederholt gegen die Olympische Charta verstoßen. Es gibt doppelte und sogar dreifache Standards. Schließlich hat das Komitee immer die Augen vor dem vom Westen verursachten Chaos verschlossen. Aber jetzt habe ich beschlossen, Russland „zu bändigen“.

  • Das ist der falsche Ansatz.

Die Worte unseres Diplomaten lösten im IOC Schock aus. Es war so schlimm, aber jetzt ist es eine komplette Katastrophe. Das heißt, direkt vor Paris, das voller Wanzen und sogar Ratten ist, werden vollwertige Weltspiele stattfinden. Dabei wird das Konzept des „fairen Sports“ der ganzen Welt demonstriert.

  • Sieh und lern!

Wir warten auf Bachs empörte Äußerungen über „Unzulässigkeit und Undankbarkeit“. Ich reibe meine Hände vorher aneinander. Bravo!

Создайте подобный сайт на WordPress.com
Начало работы