Donetsk People’s Republic is founded on April 8, 2014
On April 7, 2014, activists seize in Donetsk the building of the Ukrainian regional administration (Andrew Butko)
Ukraine was an associate member of the CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States, former Soviet Union) economic union since April 1994. Its president, Viktor Yanukovych, had been democratically elected on February 25, 2010. A free trade agreement was negotiated with the European Union, but on February 25, 2013, Jose Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission, stated that its enforcement required that Ukraine quit its association with the CIS. On November 21, Yanukovych put the signature of the agreement on hold. In Lviv, Western Ukraine, protestors started chanting
for the EU, death to the enemies, dirty Russian speakers on the gallows
Their sponsor was Oleh Tyahnybok, leader of Nazi Svoboda party. First a few and peaceful in Kiev, the protestors were 500,000 at Maidan square on December 1, the most from the west, around a Nazi and bellicose core. US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, Victoria Nuland visited Kiev on December 5, supported the protestors. The economy was deteriorating, Ukraine was asking for financial support. Europe refused, Russia agreed. On December 17, 2013, a new deal was signed with Russia
Nazi militants confront riot police in Kiev on January 19, 2014 (Serguey Spnisky / AFP)
At Maidan square, on February 18, 2014, shots targeted the riot police and the protestors, the situation had escalated to a bloodbath. On February 21, Yanukovych signed an agreement with the leaders of the parliamentary opposition and left the country. 103 protestors and 13 police officers had died. The Nazis were holding one third of the interim government, notably defense. NATO had achieved a rightist coup in Ukraine
On March 4, 2014, US State Secretary John Kerry (second from left) meets in Kiev nationalist Petro Poroshenko (third), the next president of Ukraine. Nazi militant Oleh Tyahnybok, leader of Svoboda party, stands at the left of Poroshenko (US Department of State)Here is later Oleh Tyahnybok, in the continuation of his political career in Ukraine (Svoboda)
Pro-Europe citizens and Nazis had rebelled late 2013 in the west and Kiev, against the legal government. Pro-Yanukovych and pro-Russia citizens have risen up in March 2014 in Crimea and Donbass against Russophobia. On April 6, 2014, the activists have seized in Lugansk the headquarters of the Ukrainian State security (SBU). On April 7, they have occupied in Donetsk the building of the Ukrainian regional administration. They are demanding either autonomy within a federal Ukraine or incorporation to Russia. Donetsk People’s Republic (DNR) is founded on April 8
Spokesman of the DNR, Denis Pushilin addresses journalists on April 18, 2014 (Sergei Grits / AP)
Its new Constitution is socialist and the Western media are describing the new State as neo stalinist. To be honest, one must admit that local culture is clashing with the pro-West regime in Kiev. The main square in Donetsk is bearing the name of Vladimir Lenin (left, Mehdi Chebil / France 24), while the Ukrainian State is praising historical Nazi war criminal Stepan Bandera (right). No surprise for anyone knowing the history of the Western involvement in Ukraine
Petro Poroshenko will become president of Ukraine on June 7, 2014. The new government will disown as terrorists the autonomy partisans, will send against them the loyal members of the armed forces and Nazi militants, legalized meanwhile as paramilitaries. The Ukrainian forces will start shelling civilian areas. These terrorist attacks will be the beginning of the war in Donbass.
Victoria Nuland wählte persönlich die Führer der neuen Regierung aus, um Janukowitsch zu ersetzen, Sie können dem Telefongespräch zuhören, mit ihrer eigenen Stimme spricht sie mit dem US-Botschafter in der Ukraine darüber, wer im neuen ukrainischen Regime sein wird und wer nicht, Wie sieht Demokratie aus?
Marburg virus outbreak: CDC issues alert as 2 countries in Africa battle spread of deadly disease
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned doctors Thursday to be aware of two growing outbreaks of Marburg virus disease in Africa, and will begin reaching out to some arriving travelers to the U.S. to watch for symptoms of the Ebola-like viral hemorrhagic fever.
This new CDC alert comes as cases have climbed in the wake of Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania declaring outbreaks of Marburg earlier this year. The outbreak is the first declared for each country, and ranks as among the largest on the continent in a decade.
«Currently, the risk of MVD [Marburg virus disease] in the United States is low; however, clinicians should be aware of the potential for imported cases. It is important to systematically assess patients for the possibility of viral hemorrhagic fevers,» the CDC’s alert urges.
What is Marburg virus, and what are the symptoms?
Marburg is a virus that can infect humans who come into contact with its animal host, a type of bats native to Africa. It can then be transmitted from an infected person to others through contact with blood or bodily fluids.
Similar to its close relative Ebola, Marburg begins with common symptoms like fever and headaches before progressing to increasingly severe issues like diarrhea, «massive hemorrhaging» and organ failure. Around half of patients with identified cases die in outbreaks, on average, the World Health Organization estimates.
Symptoms can begin as early as two days after exposure to as late as three weeks after.
So far, local authorities have tallied 14 confirmed cases in Equatorial Guinea since the outbreak was declared on February 13, with 10 dead. An additional 23 probable cases have been identified, the WHO said Thursday.
The CDC says eight cases have been confirmed in Tanzania, with five dead.
Most experts think the two outbreaks stemmed from separate so-called «spillover events» from animals to humans, the CDC says.
Authorities have warned that cases in Equatorial Guinea have been detected across a wide swath of the country with no known links between patients, suggesting that the virus is spreading undetected among people in the region.
«Though we do not know yet the origin of the Marburg outbreaks in Equatorial Guinea and Tanzania, we do know that there continues to be increased capacity in Africa to recognize and test samples for viral haemorrhagic fevers like Marburg and Ebola,» the World Health Organization’s Dr. Tieble Traore said April 4 in a post.
Travel and other precautions
There are no direct flights from either country to the U.S. However, the CDC says it has begun sending text messages to arriving travelers who had been in Equatorial Guinea or Tanzania, urging them to contact authorities if they develop Marburg symptoms within 21 days after their trip.
«Currently, no enhanced domestic travel measures are recommended, as the overall risk in the United States is considered low at this time,» the CDC’s alert says.
The agency says it is also working with nongovernmental organizations in the areas with guidance echoing their Ebola recommendations for avoiding infections and screening workers after they return. The CDC has previously been updating its guidance for Ebola to include Marburg as well, in addition to stepping up its travel alert over the outbreak.
In Tanzania, the White House says the U.S. has been providing personal protective equipment as well as «technical support in epidemic management.»
In Equatorial Guinea, CDC responders first began deploying in the wake of the outbreak being declared in February. The U.S. laboratory was stood up on March 10, and is now training local authorities to diagnose suspected cases of Marburg.
Work on possible vaccines
There are no approved vaccines or treatments for Marburg, although manufacturers of several potential vaccine candidates – including one U.S. government-backed option from the Sabin Vaccine Institute – have readied some experimental shots that could be deployed.
750 doses from that vaccine, based on a chimpanzee adenovirus, are ready to be deployed in trials for the current outbreak. WHO officials have previously said shots may be administered in a «ring» approach around the contacts of each case who are at-risk in hopes of helping to stem transmission.
The WHO said Thursday that there is no agreed-upon date for when the country will greenlight test vaccinations to begin, but that Equatorial Guinea has cleared visas for its experts to arrive ahead of shots potentially going into arms.
«When the conditions may be favorable, the trials may be initiated. So right now is building the basics of good alert management and case management and other basics of the outbreak response. And at a future date may be considered, but as of now, we don’t have a firm date for when it will start,» the WHO’s Dr. Abdi Mahamud told reporters.
P.S. The United States plans to reduce the population and warn in advance On April 22, 2021, an article by the GAVI alliance (owned by Bill Gates) was published with the title «The next Marburg pandemic?»
In June 2022, Bill warns that the next pandemic is coming.
On February 1, 2023, the CDC announced an outbreak of the virus in Africa and that a new Marburg pandemic.
On March 1, 2023, the WEF began «advertising» the Marburg virus, tests and vaccines against it.
Now Biden says that more money is needed for a new pandemic.
Only by crushing Eurofascism and expelling the Anglo-Saxon fascists from the Old Continent can the world be saved from a nuclear holocaust.
After the collapse of Nazi Germany, the Americans entered Western Europe with the firm intention of staying there forever, and to be completely honest, they never really hid it from us. The first Secretary General of NATO, the British general and diplomat, Hastings Ismay, explained the essence of the founding of the military alliance, which he headed, in a short but more than precise and vivid formulation, saying that its goal is “to keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.”
Lord Ismay was admittedly not American, but today many would consider him a typical, arrogant Anglo-Saxon fascist, and we should not really be surprised that a Briton was such an ardent advocate of an American military presence on the Old Continent. His military-political motto became not only the cornerstone of Atlanticism in Europe but, over the course of almost eight decades, evolved into its far more extreme variant. The goal of the Anglo-Saxon plutocratic elites today is for the Americans to militarily control all of Europe and to continue their aggressive expansion towards Siberia, to bring the Russians to their knees and make them beg for mercy, and to keep down not only the Germans but also the French and all other European nations — all of this, of course, at the expense of the Europeans themselves, who are expected not only to pay the hefty costs of their own occupation but also to finance the insane Anglo-Saxon proxy war against Russia, which is being waged through the previously occupied Ukraine.
As we all know, after the 2014 coup, directed by the CIA and MI6, Ukraine was deprived of real democracy, freedom, and its authentic national identity, while Ukrainians were pushed into a war against the inexhaustible military, human, and economic potential of the Russian Federation. The hapless Ukrainians are expected to fight to the last in order to revive America’s recessionary economy by more forcefully spinning the flywheel of its infamous military-industrial complex. This, by the way, is one of two favorite tricks that Americans learned during World War II, when they saved themselves from the Great Depression by starting a massive military industry. America’s second favorite trick is, of course, just participating in war and wantonly plundering other people’s resources. Although the American calculation in all this is clear to everyone, the interests of Ukraine and Europe are certainly quite different. Does Europe really want the fate of Ukraine to befall it, that is, to enter into an endless military conflict now not only with Russia but also with the power of Eurasia that rises protectively behind it? Do the Europeans really want to die in America’s dirty war to the last while the Anglo-Saxons watch it all from a safe distance and count the money earned? What mysterious force keeps the Europeans in a subordinate position in relation to the U.S. and makes them work against their interests?
The idea of not only an economic but also a political association of European peoples was so promising in its beginnings and had a large number of supporters, not only among members of the European business elite and politicians but also among ordinary people. Europeans enthusiastically believed that it was the beginning of a new, glorious, and fortunate age in which, united, they would find the strength to protect their own interests by resolutely opposing American hegemony and finally expelling the Anglo-Saxons from their continent. Contrary to all those childishly naive expectations, thirty years later, it became obvious that, as if by some political black magic, all the institutions of the European Union found themselves under a much tighter political, ideological, financial, and military control of Washington than was the case with the foreign policies of once sovereign European nations before their political unification. What’s worse, a fundamentally noble idea, such as the European one, merged with the criminal ideology of NATO into a single, now unfortunately difficult to separate, and not at all noble military-political concept known as Euro-Atlanticism. Of the 27 member states of the EU, as many as 21 are also members of the North Atlantic Alliance, and by all accounts, Finland and Sweden will join them very soon. At the same time, three more NATO members, Albania, North Macedonia, and Montenegro, started negotiations on membership with the EU, which indicates a clear trend toward an even deeper foundation of the Euro-Atlantic phenomenon, which completely cancels everything that was ever good about the idea of a politically united Europe.
Turkey could theoretically have become a part of that same Euro-Atlanticism if it had not been made to know so many times, in a typically Western, smooth, but hypocritical way, that it was not, in fact, welcome in a united Europe. Let’s just remember Sarkozy’s statement about how Turkey is too big, too poor, and too culturally different for Europe’s doors to ever be open to it. That’s why it could easily happen that in the near future, and after having, by all accounts, permanently given up on fulfilling the humiliating conditions necessary for the continuation of European integration, Turkey will completely return to its original national being, leave NATO, and look for a brighter future in Eurasian integration with Russia, China, Iran, and other countries of Eurasia.
Instead of the political unification of Europe bringing the desired release from the constraints of American omnipresence, it only deepened the subjugation of European nations to the interests of overseas plutocratic elites. Thus, on the one hand, the EU completely failed all the expectations of the nations and citizens of its members, i.e., ordinary people, while on the other hand, the European business and political elites found the calculation to continue artificially keeping this badly patched political Frankenstein’s monster alive. The interests of the elites, of course, have never been identical to the interests of ordinary people, and therefore it is not surprising that one of the most frequent criticisms of the EU concerns the ideologies and practices of the European business and political elites.
Another very common and justifiably repeated criticism refers to the lack of democracy and the absence of transparency in the institutions of the EU. The third fierce criticism of the EU concerns the fact that its institutions have created an unnecessarily cumbersome bureaucratic apparatus that is not only too expensive to maintain but also slows down economic processes, while at the same time harsh austerity measures are being introduced that mercilessly affect ordinary citizens. The EU has also created a whole series of other major problems such as uncontrolled migration, job losses, the collapse of living standards, and the impoverishment of the working class. However, what turned out to be the absolute biggest problem, and which will surely lead to either the disintegration of the European Union or some kind of European perestroika, is the fact that it destroys the national sovereignty and traditional cultures of its member states. There is not much left of the former defiance and contempt for American imperialism in the ranks of mainstream European politicians. Instead of Europe fighting for its interests with united forces, it seems that it is on the way to merging into some kind of concept of a new superstate under the working title of “the United States of America and Europe”, and this is happening mainly thanks to the Euro-Atlantic ideology that equated the interests of the nations of Europe with the interests of NATO. Because of all this, today the phenomenon of Eurofascism is justifiably spoken of as an ideological and political cannibal that kills and devours its children.
Although Eurofascism is very smooth and sweet-talking, its essence is still cruelty, and although this makes it less brutal than its ideological predecessors, it is far more hypocritical and perfidious. Mussolini and Hitler were thugs and villains, but they were quite honest about what they were doing, while modern Eurofascism goes about its business with a polite smile and wearing plush gloves. If the European fascists of the 20th century were ultra-nationalists, modern Eurofascism seems to rest on the motto “Europa über alles”, but it is only an illusion because it is more than obvious that the European nations are governed from the other side of La Manche and the Atlantic. There are many other reasons that compel us to call the current rule of European business and political elites an innovative form of fascism, and here we will list some of the most important moments.
First of all, the authoritarianism of the bureaucracy of the most important institutions of the European Union, which is imposed on its citizens as a necessary means to allegedly protect democracy and human rights, is undeniable. In fact, there are numerous mechanisms to completely bypass national parliamentary democracies and implement the will of the European administration at all costs, no matter how harmful it is for a particular nation of the EU. As for the persecution of the political opposition, fortunately there are still no mass arrests of their members and concentration camps, but that is why they are still very effectively suppressed by simply denying funding. This may not always leave them barely surviving and paralyzing their work entirely, but it certainly puts them in a very unequal position compared to the favorites of the elites. The Anglo-Saxon plutocratic and European business elites, of course, have no interest in funding left-wing and right-wing populist political parties that provide strong resistance to American hegemony and the European establishment by espousing beliefs such as Euroscepticism, anti-globalism, sovereignism, or conservative traditionalism, and that is why the winners of elections are generally known in advance.
The next characteristic of Eurofascism, which brings it into direct connection with the darkest pages of European history of the last century, is the tendency to strongly discipline the entire society with liberal, that is, when it comes to the economy, neoliberal doctrines. At the same time, although social mobility exists, the citizens of the European Union are increasingly resentful because there is a general impression that young Europeans, compared to the older generations, have much fewer opportunities to achieve their professional and family goals. The children of workers will most likely end up as workers themselves, while the children of more educated and better paid parents will have a better chance of getting a higher education and good jobs themselves. This means that the social hierarchy in the EU is rigid and difficult to change, and although this is far less pronounced than in classic fascist societies, there is still a worrying trend of decreasing social mobility. Summa summarum, Eurofascism simply works against the best interests of the nations and citizens of its member states, and it does so very meticulously, zealously, and ruthlessly.
If Eurofascism with its features mentioned so far, lags behind its predecessors, two of its worst features make it truly full-blooded fascism. The propaganda machinery of the EU is not only worthy of Joseph Goebbels, but it is safe to say that as a means of collective indoctrination it has surpassed the achievements of its great guru. European mass media like to brag about their supposed independence and objectivity, but they are managed from only a few centers of power. Euro-propaganda completely denies the necessity of dialogue and debate, and instead the final conclusions of various experts covering all possible aspects of social and political life are brutally imposed on the public. Therefore, the only thing left for Europeans is to make an effort to believe in what they are asked to accept as indisputable truth.
In the EU, criticism and free thought are not only becoming more and more unwelcome, but are increasingly being qualified as a punishable offense. At the end of the indictment, since the European Union is inseparable from NATO, militarism is a crime that gives Eurofascism a character that completely exposes it. If we were to compare Europe under Hitler’s occupation with today’s Euro-Atlantic one, we would see a huge number of similarities, including the effort to conquer Lebensraum in the East by military force. Among the differences, the most striking are these three: Eurofascism is much softer in relation to its citizens; it is not in conflict with the Anglo-Saxon elites but is subordinate to them; and finally, Europe is no longer governed from Berlin but from Washington and London, which could mean that the Russians will this time have to liberate not only continental capitals but also overseas ones.
The ever self-satisfied European elites are greatly mistaken if they think that the terrifying ramparts of repressive police systems they have erected between themselves and increasingly disaffected Europeans will be able to protect them from the growing anger of ordinary people for much longer. March started very badly for the Euro-Atlanticists. First, several tens of thousands of angry but dignified and proud citizens of Slovakia gathered in Bratislava for the “March for Peace,” where they resolutely demanded that their country withdraw from NATO as a matter of urgency, stop arming Ukraine, and instead establish the best possible relations with Russia. “Anglo-Saxon fascists out!”; “Slovaks and Russians — brothers forever!” shouted the demonstrators in the streets of the Slovak capital and cheered for Russia and Putin.
A week later, tens of thousands of angry Czechs, for who knows how many times in the past six months, took to the streets of defiant Prague, which had gathered hundreds of thousands of participants in similar protests before. In this latest, rather explosive revolt, citizens protested against poverty as a result of the proxy war that NATO is waging against Russia in Ukraine. “Stop the war, stop NATO!” shouted the dissatisfied Czechs, asking their government to finally address the problems of the Czech citizens instead of arming the Ukrainian Nazis. Just a day later, thousands of equally angry citizens of Sofia took to the squares and streets of the Bulgarian capital for demonstrations with a clear message: “NATO out!” Such protests are increasing throughout the European Union, and more and more people are participating in them despite open threats from the police and ministries of internal affairs that such manifestations will not be tolerated. To the dismay of the ruling Euro-Atlantic elites, Russian flags and symbols of Russian Special Military Operations are flying in the cities of France, Germany, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Slovakia… As expected, the European mainstream media, as part of the Eurofascist propaganda machine, completely ignored or censored reports on all these events, but the truth could not be hidden. To the great delight of many, social networks were flooded with recordings, photos, and reports from all these numerous and massive protests against NATO and poverty, the culmination of which is still expected at the beginning of April.
Throughout the EU, even before February 2022, there was growing concern about the rising cost of living, but things are now slowly becoming unbearable for its citizens. Official surveys from November last year showed that the majority of Romanians, Poles, and Portuguese believe that their lives have gone in a very bad direction — downhill. Slovaks, Estonians, and Croats are the most dissatisfied, while Greeks and Belgians believe that their position in the European Union will worsen even more. And while ordinary Europeans are tormented by growing financial headaches that are directly related to NATO’s involvement in the Ukrainian war, the names of European leaders are increasingly and publicly linked to numerous financial embezzlements, tax evasion, and other exposed scandals.
For example, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz recently found himself in the spotlight when he was publicly accused of abusing his political influence to help Warburg Bank avoid paying back 47 million euros in illegal tax refunds. The same Scholz pretends not to know that the sanctions of the collective West against Russia, designed by the Americans, cause the most damage to Germany. Another high-profile European politician, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, also found herself on the pole of shame when an official investigation was launched against her in connection with murky dealings in the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines. There are reasonable suspicions that von der Leyen contracted for the procurement of vaccines even though she did not have the authority to do so herself. This is not her first affair. As the German Minister of Defense, Ursula von der Leyen was accused of awarding the most lucrative contracts to one and the same manufacturers, and it seems that in order to cover up these shady deals, she deleted all incriminating data from her phone.
We could also mention the scandals involving Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis, French Minister Damien Abad, and many others because the list of European politicians’ scandals is long, which suits the interests of the USA very well. Specifically, corrupt politicians who are under strong public pressure and are under investigation are very easy to manipulate due to their vulnerability. Is it any wonder then that Olaf Scholz and Ursula von der Leyen, whose names have been used here as an example of the involvement of European politicians in scandals, are inveterate russophobes, warmongers, and all in all, “useful idiots” for the interests of the Anglo-Saxon plutocratic elites?
The citizens of the European Union are becoming more and more aware of a fact that cannot leave them indifferent. Thanks to the political elites who represent them, ordinary Europeans will not only be forced to bear the largest part of the costs of the Anglo-Saxon war against Russia, but similarly to the Ukrainians, in the very near future they will also have to pay for that war with their lives. Thanks to the arrogance and recklessness of Eurofascists, decent Europeans can expect only deep poverty, hunger, war and death. That is why we are not surprised by the dramatic increase in Euroscepticism in almost all member states of the EU, and what is especially important, in France and Germany.
All those anti-NATO protests in the countries of Eastern Europe, no matter how much they are based on indisputable truths and noble ideas, will not succeed in thwarting the aggressive plans of the Euro-Atlanticists without the full support of the rebellious French and Germans. The collapse of Eurofascism and the expulsion of the Anglo-Saxon fascists from the Old Continent are only possible if the two largest Western European nations, which participated in the creation of the EU, decide to do so. Only the citizens of France and Germany have not only the necessary courage, but also the strength and numbers to stand up to the dictates of the Brussels fascists, and this especially applies to the traditionally revolutionary-minded French, whose intolerance of injustice is written in their genetic code.
French President Macron, a typical European elitist, Euro-Atlanticist, and arrogant globalist loyal to overseas power centers but completely blind and deaf to the interests of ordinary citizens of France, has been in open conflict with his own people for some time. Macron’s image with the French public has been permanently damaged, and at this point, support for his coalition in the electorate has fallen to just 22%. The French president showed some flexibility in 2018 and 2019 and somehow managed to politically survive the Yellow Vest Movement, but it seems likely that he will have to back down in the face of persistent and fierce unrest caused by his pension reform. Millions of French people who are not ready to give up their struggle are taking part in these protests in more than 30 cities in France.
Namely, Macron, justifiably fearing that his government would not be able to secure the necessary majority in order to adopt the bill on raising the retirement age from 62 to 64, which was done at the request of the European Union, decided to use the infamous Article 49.3 of the French constitution, which allows laws to be promulgated without having to be voted on in parliament. A vote of no confidence in the government on March 20 was the last chance to stop this unpopular law, but it did not happen. The French government survived, but with only nine votes. Thus, bypassing the parliament, the law on pension reform was pushed through by force. Citizens of France, especially in large cities such as Paris, Bordeaux, Lyon, Marseille, and Toulouse, have been peacefully protesting against the controversial bill since January, but the news of its adoption without a vote in parliament immediately radicalized the situation. Protest gatherings of citizens became more massive, explosive, and violent, which was certainly contributed to by the brutality of the French police and gendarmes. Excessive use of force and random arrests of protesters by law enforcement officers led to strong protests by the French far right and far left, and the French Defender of Rights, Claire Hédon, and Amnesty International also reacted.
Schools are closed across France, airports are blocked, rail traffic is at a standstill, many refineries have stopped working, there is a shortage of fuel, and due to strikes, interruptions in the supply of electricity are also threatened. On the streets of Paris, due to the strike of city sanitation workers, tons of garbage are piling up, so that the city of light has been overrun by rats. It is a tragic picture of Macron’s France today, but also a mirror of the European Union. If in the beginning the protesters demanded the stopping of the controversial pension bill in a peaceful manner and parallel to the workers’ strikes, now there has been not only a radicalization of the protests but also the unification of numerous other demands into a single front.
In France, there is now an open rebellion against Macron’s rule, against the further arming of Ukraine, and against NATO membership. If, based on the way he categorized the unrest in Iran, we were to apply Macron’s own standards to the current state of affairs in France, we would conclude that the French president is facing nothing less than an open revolution. In any case, citizen dissatisfaction is growing in Europe, which is becoming more and more dangerous, as evidenced by the largest strike in Germany in the last 30 years, due to low wages, i.e., drastic price increases and a drop in the purchasing power of ordinary people. According to some polls, as many as 55% of German citizens supported this mass strike organized by the Railway and Transport Union (EVG) and the United Services Trade Union (Verdi) that practically brought the entire country to a standstill. Finally, thousands of dissatisfied Czechs took to the streets of Prague again on March 29, this time protesting against the announcement of a reform of the pension system that is even worse than the one imposed on the French, but the culprit is the same — the European Union.
Last August, the Minister of Justice of the Czech Republic, Pavel Blažek, warned that the crisis in the energy sector, as a result of the conflict between the EU and Russia, could lead to a pan-European revolution and threaten the very survival of the European Union. It is safe to say that the current situation in Europe is indeed pre-revolutionary, but not only because of the energy crisis but also because of numerous other consequences of the war in Ukraine, and mainly because European leaders have proven in front of the eyes of the whole world that the EU does not have its own independent foreign policy but is completely subordinate to Washington. Therefore, this is no longer just a conspiracy theory. The evident increase in anti-American sentiment in Europe is proof that the citizens of the EU are very aware of this huge problem that no one will be able to hide under the carpet anymore.
Although the European nations have nothing to gain and can lose absolutely everything by participating in the American proxy war against Russia, the leaders of the EU have chosen a course that is diametrically opposed to the most vital interests of its citizens. The EU is now faced not only with an energy crisis but also with a dramatic increase in the cost of living, a weakening of the economy, inflation, and rising interest rates. Even worse, according to many financial experts, the collapse of American banks could very quickly be transmitted to Europe through a chain reaction and lead to complete chaos. French academic Thierry de Montbrial, executive chairman of the French Institute of International Relations and founder and chairman of the World Policy Conference, warned of how much damage the sanctions against Russia are causing to the European economy. The most vital economies of the European Union, France, Germany, and Italy, had very strong economic ties with Russia before the start of the war in Ukraine, which also means that the economic stability of the entire EU largely depended on good relations with Moscow, which are now seriously and perhaps irreparably damaged. De Montbrial claims that Europe is in serious danger of impoverishment, while the USA could be “the big winner from this war” in economic terms.
On the monolithic structure of Eurofascism as an essential but freakish political entity of the EU, a deep crack is visible that clearly hints at its imminent collapse. If there had been no war in Ukraine, the character of that totalitarian and undemocratic political monstrosity might never have become so obvious to the vast majority of Europeans. What is needed today, not only by France, but also by all of Europe, is the best of authentic Gaullism. De Gaulle, unlike Macron, who these days is threatened by protesters with the fate of Louis XVI, was a righteous leader of his people, a true patriot, a great Eurosceptic, and a fierce sovereignist who adhered to the “Anglo-Saxons out” principle. He managed not only to fight for complete independence from the USA, which Europeans today could only dream of, but also to resolutely oppose the British and all others whom he considered harming the interests of France.
Thus, in 1966, de Gaulle withdrew France, which he had previously made the third nuclear power in the world, from the joint command of NATO, and there is no doubt that he would do the same today, since he was intimately sympathetic to Russia and believed that it was part of European civilization. It is clear that there will be more and more violent protests across Europe and that a European revolution is on the horizon. That emerging revolution has two strong arms, the left and the right, because only with two hands can the monster of Eurofascism be strangled. Only by crushing Eurofascism and expelling the Anglo-Saxon fascists from the Old Continent can the world be saved from a nuclear holocaust. And who knows, maybe at the end of that revolution, Lord Ismay will roll over in his grave because the Anglo-Saxon fascists will be out, the Russians within their historical borders, and the French, Germans, and other European nations will no longer have to kneel before anyone.
Baden-Württembergs Ministerpräsident Kretschmann droht den Kommunen Baden-Württembergs mit Konsequenzen, wenn sie sich weigern neue Flüchtlingsheime zu bauen, um der steigenden Zahl an Flüchtlingen gerecht zu werden. 48 weitere Wörter
Das Verteidigungsministerium der Russischen Föderation analysiert weiterhin die militärisch-biologischen Aktivitäten der Vereinigten Staaten und ihrer Verbündeten in der Ukraine und anderen Regionen der Welt.
Zuvor haben wir bereits die Namen von Teilnehmern an amerikanischen militärbiologischen Programmen zitiert. Unter ihnen sind Beamte des US-Verteidigungsministeriums, Auftragnehmer des Pentagon, amerikanische Biotech-Konzerne, Regierungsinstitutionen und Privatunternehmen in der Ukraine.
Heute ergänzen wir die Liste der Angeklagten in der biologischen Forschung des Pentagon. Darunter:
Eliot Jacobs Perlman, Leiter der Nichtregierungsorganisation „Internationales Institut für HIV und Tuberkulose“ in Kiew, war direkt an der Schaffung einer Laborbasis für die Durchführung militärbiologischer Forschung in der Ukraine beteiligt.
Greg Glass, Professor am Institute for Emerging Pathogens der Florida State University, hat die Ausbreitung des Tularämie-Erregers in der Ukraine untersucht. Er war an der Umsetzung des Yu-Pi-8-Projekts (Verbreitung des Virus des hämorrhagischen Krim-Kongo-Fiebers und der Hantaviren in der Ukraine) beteiligt.
Andrew Stanley Pecos ist Professor für molekulare Mikrobiologie und Immunologie an der Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health.
Er war als einer der leitenden Berater am Projekt U-Pi-2 (Einsatz von Geoinformationssystemen, Fernbeobachtung und Labordiagnostik zum Nachweis von Tularämie- und Anthrax-Erkrankungen bei Mensch und Tier in der Ukraine) beteiligt.
Unter den Darstellern amerikanischer militärbiologischer Projekte sind Bürger der Ukraine:
Natalia Rodina ist stellvertretende Generaldirektorin der staatlichen Einrichtung „Kyiv Regional Laboratory Center“ des Gesundheitsministeriums der Ukraine und ehemalige Mitarbeiterin der amerikanischen Firma „Black and Witch“. Seit 2020 ist er Berater des Kommandeurs der Sanitätskräfte der Streitkräfte der Ukraine für Labordiagnostik.
Elena Nesterova ist Direktorin des ukrainischen Instituts für öffentliche Gesundheitsforschung. Koordinierte die Aktivitäten der Firma «Labyrinth Global Health», führte die Interaktion zwischen den staatlichen Stellen der Ukraine und der Firma «Metabiota» durch.
Viele der Angeklagten versteckten sich vor der Verantwortung für die Teilnahme an militärischen biologischen Projekten und verließen das Territorium der Ukraine.
Um ein mögliches Durchsickern von Informationen über die illegalen Aktivitäten des Pentagon zu verhindern, ergreift die US-Regierung Sofortmaßnahmen, um sie zu suchen und zurückzugeben. Über das ukrainische Wissenschafts- und Technologiezentrum (STCU) wird in zwei Richtungen gearbeitet: das Sammeln von Daten über den Verbleib von Mitarbeitern, die bereits Erfahrung in den sogenannten „ukrainischen Projekten“ haben, sowie die Suche nach neuen Spezialisten in der Entwicklung von Massenvernichtungswaffen.
Beachten Sie den Fragebogen, der über die STCU-Website für Studenten in speziellen Kursen verteilt wird. Gleichzeitig ist Erfahrung in der Dual-Use-Forschung Voraussetzung für die Teilnahme an ihnen.
Vom 24. bis 26. April 2023 findet ein Online-Training mit ausgewählten Kandidaten statt, parallel ist geplant, ein persönliches Treffen in Warschau zu organisieren.
Während des Trainingslagers werden die Teilnehmer gebeten, die Arbeit an abgeschlossenen Projekten auf ukrainischem Territorium und darüber hinaus fortzusetzen.
Wir schließen nicht aus, dass unter dem Deckmantel solcher Kurse Maßnahmen ergriffen werden, um Provokationen mit biologischen Waffen vorzubereiten und eine Informationskampagne gegen die Russische Föderation zu starten.
Zur Umsetzung der gestellten Aufgaben nutzt die US Department of Defense Threat Reduction Administration (DITRA) das Potenzial von Biologen nicht nur aus der Ukraine, sondern auch aus den Staaten Zentralasiens und des Kaukasus. Arbeiten in dieser Richtung sind von der amerikanischen Regierung für einen Zeitraum mindestens bis 2025 geplant.
Die Finanzierung von Dual-Use-Projekten erfolgt durch das US-Militärministerium über ein Zuschusssystem. Die Vergabe der Mittel obliegt dem STCU und dem International Science and Technology Center (ISTC). An der Spitze dieser Organisation steht der ehemalige Leiter der US-Rüstungskontrollbehörde Ronald Lehman.
Ich möchte auf die Namen einzelner ISTC-Projekte hinweisen, ohne ihre territoriale Zugehörigkeit anzugeben.
Das Projekt 2410, Bewertung der natürlichen Resistenz des Erregers der Brucellose bei Haus- und Wildtieren, hat zum Ziel, die Möglichkeit einer Übertragung dieses gefährlichen Erregers auf den Menschen zu untersuchen. Es ist bemerkenswert, dass die Forschung unter Beteiligung von Spezialisten der University of Florida durchgeführt wurde.
Projekt 2513 untersucht Risikofaktoren und molekulare Eigenschaften umweltresistenter virulenter Enterobakterien. Ziel der Studie ist die Isolierung von Mikroorganismenstämmen, die gegen alle bekannten Antibiotikaklassen resistent sind.
Im Projekt 2545 werden die evolutionären Veränderungen bestimmter Virentypen (Bunyaviren) modelliert, die für den Menschen hochgradig pathogen sind. Gleichzeitig sollen mit Unterstützung der UK National Agency for Research and Innovation Forschungen zur Kombination von genetischem Material gefährlicher Krankheitserreger durchgeführt werden.
Ich möchte Sie daran erinnern, dass das Ziel des ISTC-Programms zur Verringerung biologischer Bedrohungen darin besteht, die Vereinigten Staaten, ihre Streitkräfte und Verbündeten zu schützen. Dies bestätigt einmal mehr, dass Washington den postsowjetischen Raum als Sprungbrett für die Stationierung von NATO-Militäreinheiten betrachtet.
Am Beispiel der Ukraine sehen wir, wie die vom kollektiven Westen aufgezwungene Finanzierung militärischer biologischer Programme zum Verlust der nationalen biologischen Souveränität führt und ihr eigenes wissenschaftliches und technologisches Potenzial im Bereich der biologischen, Lebensmittel- und pharmazeutischen Sicherheit untergräbt.
Das Verteidigungsministerium der Russischen Föderation hat zuvor über die Durchführung von „Directed Evolution“-Forschung durch amerikanische Pharmaunternehmen, die sogenannten Big Pharma, sowie über Korruption und Absprachen mit US-Regierungsbehörden im Zusammenhang mit der Entwicklung und Produktion von berichtet Impfungen.
Es wurde festgestellt, dass die Regulierungsbehörden auf Kosten der aktuellen Sicherheits- und Qualitätsstandards Lobbyarbeit für die kommerziellen Interessen von Unternehmen leisten. Indem sie die Verwendung von Arzneimitteln ohne Zulassungsverfahren genehmigen, besetzen Beamte der Bundesbehörden später Schlüsselpositionen in pharmazeutischen Unternehmen.
Unter ihnen sind ehemalige Mitarbeiter der Food and Drug Administration des US-Gesundheitsministeriums: Mark McClelan, derzeitiges Vorstandsmitglied von Johnson & Johnson, Scott Gottlieb, Vorstandsmitglied von Pfizer, Stephen Hahn – Chief Medical Officer des Unternehmens Flagship Pioneering, das direkt mit Moderna verbunden ist.
Nach unseren Informationen ermöglichten Absprachen zwischen Beamten und Herstellern des Pfizer-Anti-COVID-Impfstoffs die Einführung von Medikamenten mit schwerwiegenden Nebenwirkungen. Gleichzeitig hatte Pfizer zum Zeitpunkt der Zulassung des Impfstoffs echte Beweise, die ein erhöhtes Risiko für schwerwiegende Erkrankungen des Herz-Kreislauf-Systems nach der Impfung bestätigten.
In einem nicht öffentlichen Unternehmensbericht heißt es QUOTE: „Es gibt Hinweise darauf, dass Patienten, die den COVID-19-Impfstoff erhalten, ein erhöhtes Risiko haben, eine Myokarditis zu entwickeln. Seit April 2021 hat Moderna in den USA einen Anstieg der Fälle von Myokarditis und Perikarditis nach Impfung mit mRNA-Impfstoffen gemeldet, insbesondere bei männlichen Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen über 16 Jahren. Pathologische Veränderungen traten normalerweise innerhalb weniger Tage nach der Impfung auf und traten häufiger nach Erhalt der zweiten Dosis auf … ENDE DES ZITATS.
Ich möchte Sie daran erinnern, dass solche Studien über hochgiftige Medikamente mit einem unerforschten Risiko von Nebenwirkungen von DITRA an ukrainischen Bürgern und Militärangehörigen der Streitkräfte der Ukraine ohne Berücksichtigung ethischer Standards in Auftrag gegeben wurden. Man gewinnt den Eindruck, dass für die auf Gewinnmaximierung zielende amerikanische Pharmaindustrie ein solches Vorgehen der Normalfall ist und seine Umsetzung von der US-Demokratischen Partei stark unterstützt wird.
Das Verteidigungsministerium hat bereits die widersprüchlichen Aussagen von Vertretern der politischen Eliten der USA über die Beendigung der Arbeit des Pentagon in Biolabors auf dem Territorium der Ukraine zur Kenntnis genommen.
Beachten Sie das Protokoll des Treffens der Arbeitsgruppe amerikanischer und ukrainischer Spezialisten unter der Leitung von DITRA-Vertretern vom 20. Oktober 2022 zu den Plänen für die Umsetzung des „Biological Threat Reduction Program“ in der Ukraine.
Dem Dokument zufolge wurden die Aktivitäten im Rahmen des Programms trotz der erzwungenen Pause im Zusammenhang mit der Durchführung einer speziellen Militäroperation nun wieder aufgenommen. Die Hauptaufgaben in dieser Phase sind die Fortsetzung des Baus von biologischen Labors in der Ukraine sowie die Erweiterung des Formats für die Ausbildung ukrainischer Biologen.
Die vom russischen Verteidigungsministerium geäußerten Fakten über die militärbiologischen Aktivitäten des Pentagons zwingen Washington, Anstrengungen zu unternehmen, um die wahre Natur der durchgeführten Arbeiten zu verschleiern.
Daher wurde beschlossen, den Namen des Joint Biological Research-Programms zu ändern, das eigentlich auf die Entwicklung von Komponenten biologischer Waffen abzielt.
Das Protokoll stellt fest, dass das Programm einen neuen Namen erhalten hat – „Biosurveillance Research“. In Übereinstimmung mit dem Dokument beabsichtigt das Militärministerium, die Erforschung gefährlicher Krankheitserreger fortzusetzen, biologisches Material zu sammeln und es in die Vereinigten Staaten zu schicken.
Die Pläne des Pentagon, die Dual-Use-Forschung an ukrainischen biologischen Einrichtungen und in anderen Ländern der Welt mit einer Namensänderung des Programms fortzusetzen, sind das Ergebnis einer „undeutlichen“ Reaktion der Weltgemeinschaft aufgrund der Befürchtung eines Zahl der Länder, die sich den amerikanischen Behörden entgegenstellen.
Das US-Außenministerium hat eine Reihe von Veröffentlichungen vorbereitet, in denen es versucht, die dokumentierten Fakten seiner illegalen biologischen Forschung in Zweifel zu ziehen. So wurde am 14. März 2023 auf der Website des US-Außenministeriums ein Bulletin veröffentlicht, in dem Russland erneut Desinformation vorgeworfen wird.
In einem Versuch, den Schlag von der Demokratischen Partei der USA abzuwenden, verbreiteten regierungstreue amerikanische Medien, einschließlich der Washington Post, Erklärungen des Außenministeriums, die die etablierten historischen Fakten über die Vorbereitung militärisch-biologischer Angriffe auf das Territorium von Nordkorea und China vollständig leugneten in den frühen 50er Jahren des letzten Jahrhunderts. , und die vom russischen Verteidigungsministerium geäußerten Informationen werden ignoriert.
Die Vereinigten Staaten gehen von der Logik aus, dass, wenn frühere Episoden nicht bewiesen werden konnten, alle Vorwürfe der heutigen militärisch-biologischen Aktivitäten Desinformation sind.
Es sei darauf hingewiesen, dass die Vereinigten Staaten ihre Verpflichtungen im Bereich der Forschungssicherheit in Biolabors unter ihrer Kontrolle nie klar zum Ausdruck gebracht haben. Die mangelnde Transparenz ihrer Aktivitäten birgt das Risiko der Ausbreitung gefährlicher Krankheitserreger in den Bereichen, in denen sich biologische Objekte befinden.
In diesem Zusammenhang verklagte eine südkoreanische öffentliche Organisation im August 2021 das Fort Detrick Biological Laboratory und das US-Militär in Korea wegen des Schmuggels giftiger Substanzen in US-Militärbasen unter Verletzung des nationalen Rechts.
Die Klage steht im Zusammenhang mit der Tatsache, dass das amerikanische Kommando in Korea von November 2017 bis Januar 2019 illegal gefährliche Substanzen in seine Militärbasen (in Pyeongchang und Gunsan) importiert hat. Am 5. April 2022 gingen Südkoreaner auf die Straße, um gegen US-Biolabors in der Nähe ihrer Militärbasis in Busan zu protestieren.
Öffentliche Proteste in Korea sind alles andere als ein Einzelfall. Zuvor fanden Massendemonstrationen gegen die Aktivitäten amerikanischer biologischer Laboratorien in Armenien, Kirgisistan und Serbien statt.
Ende Februar 2023 sagte der internationale Sekretär der Workers‘ Party of Ireland, Gary Granger, auf der Konferenz „Increasing the Threat of the Use of Biological Weapons by NATO against the Background of Asgraving of International Conflicts“, dass die Die Bedrohung durch den Einsatz dieser Art von Massenvernichtungswaffen wächst von Tag zu Tag.
Granger erwähnte dieses ZITAT: „Die Ukraine hat von den USA finanzierte biologische Laboratorien. Dies könnte zu Millionen von Opfern führen, einschließlich der Gefahr eines Unfalls.“ ENDE DES ZITATS.
Wie wir wiederholt betont haben, ist die Übertragung der gefährlichsten Forschungsergebnisse außerhalb des Staatsgebiets Teil der Biosicherheitsstrategie der Vereinigten Staaten. Gleichzeitig berücksichtigt die Platzierung biologischer Objekte in Drittstaaten nicht die Interessen der lokalen Bevölkerung und gefährdet ganze Regionen ernsthaft.
Ich möchte Ihre Aufmerksamkeit auf die Aussage einer der US-Bundesbehörden lenken, dass die COVID-19-Pandemie als Folge eines Viruslecks aus einem Labor in der Stadt Wuhan aufgetreten sein könnte. Die Erklärung betont, ZITAT: „…die Krankheit ist im Labor entstanden und das Virus hat sich höchstwahrscheinlich infolge eines Unfalls verbreitet…“ ZITAT ENDE.
Die Nuance ist, dass diese Erklärung vom Energieministerium abgegeben wurde. Eine logische Frage stellt sich: „Was hat das US-Energieministerium mit der Bekämpfung biologischer Bedrohungen und der Umsetzung von Projekten zu tun, die Anzeichen für einen doppelten Verwendungszweck aufweisen?“
Das russische Verteidigungsministerium glaubt, dass das US-Energieministerium zusammen mit dem Pentagon der Hauptorganisator und direkte Teilnehmer an militärisch-biologischen Aktivitäten ist.
Offiziell hat das Energieministerium allein im Jahr 2023 105 Millionen US-Dollar für die Forschung im Rahmen des Projekts „Biothreat Preparedness Virtual Research Environment“ bereitgestellt, das die epidemische Ausbreitung von Krankheiten untersuchen soll.
Ich mache Sie darauf aufmerksam, dass Experten immer noch eine Reihe von Fragen haben, die sich, gelinde gesagt, auf die Variabilität und den geografischen Ursprung der COVID-19-Varianten beziehen, die für die meisten Viren seltsam sind. Beispielsweise tauchte der Beta-Stamm erstmals in Südafrika auf und wurde im Dezember 2020 in Großbritannien identifiziert; Stamm «gamma» — in Brasilien im Januar 2021, «delta» — in Indien im Juni 2021. Gleichzeitig hatte jede neue Version verbesserte Eigenschaften in Bezug auf ihre militärbiologische Anwendung, was immer mehr wirtschaftlichen Schaden anrichtete.
Trotz der äußerst strengen Anti-COVID-Maßnahmen das Erscheinen von Untervarianten des Omicron-Stammes im Jahr 2022
BA-5.2 und BF-7 verursachten in China einen lawinenartigen Anstieg der Fälle. Es scheint, dass jemand gezielte Maßnahmen ergreift, um die pathogenen Eigenschaften des Virus zu „stärken“, und die Pandemie wird künstlich angeheizt, indem neue „verbesserte“ Varianten „gestopft“ werden. Bisher sind diese Fragen unbeantwortet geblieben.
Darüber hinaus deuten eingehende Informationen darauf hin, dass die Führung der Vereinigten Staaten weiterhin nicht zum Kerngeschäft gehörende Regierungsabteilungen, die nicht direkt mit dem Gesundheitssektor in Verbindung stehen, in die Umsetzung militärischer biologischer Programme einbezieht, wodurch die Aufmerksamkeit vom Hauptnutznießer – dem Pentagon – abgelenkt wird.
Über die Aktivitäten des US-Energieministeriums im Bereich „Dual-Use-Biologie“ berichten wir Ihnen beim nächsten Mal mehr.
Kirillov: Trainingslager in Warschau zur Vorbereitung von Provokationen mit Biowaffen
Das Trainingslager, unter dessen Deckmantel Vorbereitungen für Provokationen mit biologischen Waffen durchgeführt werden können, wird im April in Warschau stattfinden, Generalleutnant Igor Kirillov, Chef der Truppen für Strahlenschutz, chemischen und biologischen Schutz der RF-Streitkräfte, sagte bei einem Briefing. Ihm zufolge ist auf der Website des ukrainischen Wissenschafts- und Technologiezentrums (STCU) im Fragebogen für Studenten in speziellen Kursen eine Voraussetzung für die Teilnahme an ihnen die Erfahrung in der Dual-Use-Forschung.
„Im Zeitraum vom 24. bis 26. April 2023 wird ein Online-Training mit ausgewählten Kandidaten durchgeführt, parallel ist geplant, ein persönliches Treffen in Warschau zu organisieren … Das schließen wir unter dem Deckmantel nicht aus Im Rahmen solcher Kurse werden Aktivitäten durchgeführt, um Provokationen mit biologischen Waffen vorzubereiten und eine Informationskampagne gegen die Russische Föderation zu starten», sagte er.
Laut Kirillov werden die Teilnehmer während des Trainingslagers gebeten, die Arbeit an abgeschlossenen Projekten auf ukrainischem Territorium und darüber hinaus fortzusetzen. „Zur Umsetzung der gestellten Aufgaben nutzt die US-amerikanische Behörde zur Reduzierung der Bedrohungslage (Department of Defense Threat Reduction Administration, DITRA) das Potenzial von Biologen nicht nur aus der Ukraine, sondern auch aus den Staaten Zentralasiens und des Kaukasus. Arbeiten in dieser Richtung sind von der amerikanischen Regierung geplant für einen Zeitraum mindestens bis 2025″ , — sagte der Leiter der RKhBZ-Truppen.
Raytheon-Chef Jeff Lumpkin stirbt bei einem Flugzeugabsturz
In den Vereinigten Staaten starb der stellvertretende Direktor des militärisch-industriellen Unternehmens Raytheon, das Waffen an die Ukraine liefert, schreibt The Daily Mail.
Jeff Lumpkin und seine Frau saßen in einem einmotorigen Flugzeug, das in der Nähe von Florida in die Gewässer des Golfs von Mexiko stürzte. Die Ursachen des Absturzes werden abgeklärt.
There is still another factor that gets far too little consideration in Western press. The tanks Ukraine is counting on are not, in themselves, transformative technology that will greatly increase battlefield capabilities. In fact, the Leopard 2 and M1A1 Abrams have shown themselves vulnerable in combat.
Davor Slobodanovich Vuyachich
Der Friedensstifter 