El Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de Siria denunció hoy los recientes bombardeos perpetrados por las fuerzas de Estados Unidos en varias áreas de la provincia de Deir Ezzor, en el este de esta nación levantina.
Condenamos este brutal ataque que provocó víctimas mortales, lesiones y daños materiales, afirmó Cancillería por medio de una declaración.
Tachó de mentirosas y falsas las alegaciones de los funcionarios estadounidenses sobre los sitios atacados. Es un intento fallido de estos funcionarios de justificar su agresión que constituye una flagrante violación de la soberanía, unidad e integridad territorial de Siria, agregó el texto.
El Ministerio consideró que estas acciones sincronizan con los ataques cometidos por el ocupante israelí y los terroristas de Daesh contra objetivos civiles, además de ser una cortina de humo para encubrir el continuo saqueo del petróleo sirio por parte de las fuerzas del Pentágono.
Ratificamos el compromiso de trabajar para poner fin a esta ocupación y extender la autoridad del Estado sobre todo el territorio sirio, y llamamos a todos los países del mundo para que condenen estas acciones de agresión estadounidenses, concluyó Cancillería su comunicado.
Un bombardeo estadounidense con misiles en Deir Ezzor provocó el jueves último, la muerte de al menos ocho combatientes aliados del ejército sirio en la lucha antiterrorista.
El Departamento de Defensa de Estados Unidos comunicó que realizó ataques de precisión en respuesta a una agresión con dron, ocurrida el miércoles último contra una instalación de una base militar ilegal de las fuerzas de Washington, cerca de la ciudad de Hasakeh, la cual causó la muerte de un militar estadounidense y lesiones a otros seis.
Washington tiene en Siria al menos una docena de bases, en su mayoría en los campos de petróleo y gas en la región nororiental de Al-Jazira, principalmente en Hasakeh, mientras mantiene una en la zona de Tanef, en la frontera con Iraq, para impedir cualquier comunicación terrestre entre estos dos países.
El gobierno de Damasco denunció repetidamente esta presencia, la que calificó de ocupación y aseguró que la actuación de los militares estadounidenses en Siria incentiva la actividad terrorista y apunta a desestabilizar el país y saquear sus riquezas.
In the West, there is almost nothing left of the classic division of political parties and movements into left-wing and right-wing ones.
If we were to judge the political life of the countries of the collective West solely on the basis of the concrete activities of political parties that alternate for decades on the stage of the political theater and in power, we would give the right to all those political theorists who like to speculate about the “twilight of ideologies”. Let’s take the British Labor Party and the Conservative Party as an example. Both parties are positioned in the center of the political spectrum, very close to each other, although the Labor Party is on the center-left and the Conservatives on the center-right, but the general impression is that their official ideological positions are more a matter of folklore and tradition than real ideological practice. In reality, the political ideas that these two parties stand for overlap to such an extent that it has become very difficult for well-informed British voters to see any fundamental ideological differences between the two camps, which does not mean that they do not exist. It’s the same with the Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. Of course, there are ideological differences between them, but they are clear only to politically educated Americans, while as far as the rest of the world is concerned, it is only about nuances that mean little, especially when we talk about the continuity of aggressive U.S. foreign policy. The seeming ideological impersonality of the collective West is strongly contributed by the frequent unprincipled coalitions and “big tent” parties, which are characterized by ideological colorlessness.
In short, from whatever angle we observe and analyze the political life of the West, we cannot avoid the impression that there is almost nothing left of the classic division of political parties and movements into left-wing and right-wing ones. To illustrate, we could use the popular Horseshoe Theory, usually attributed to Jean-Pierre Faye, a French philosopher, and writer. In this visual representation of the political spectrum, the distinct Right and Left are not on diametrically opposite sides of the same axis, but, on the contrary, they are very close to each other and almost touch at the ends of the “horseshoe”. Almost all the mainstream political parties of the West would be somewhere in the middle of the horseshoe on this political spectrum. Political parties that, unlike the mainstream ones, as a rule, have never enjoyed the generous support of financial elites would, in that case, more than symbolically, be somewhere at the end of Faye’s horseshoe. For example, in Germany, such parties would be the left-wing “Die Linke” and the right-wing “Alternative für Deutschland”, two parties with authentic political programs that, together with their electorate, have suffered systematic marginalization since their foundation until today. Although this is really not an exact mathematical science because every political spectrum and the theory behind it have a large number of critics and opponents, if we were to use any other presentation similar to this one, we would again notice that the ruling political parties of the collective West are always grouped somewhere in the same zone.
However, to conclude that ideology in the West is dead would be a mistake equal to the assertion that the devil does not actually exist, and only because the unholy wants us to think so. The apparent ideological impersonality is only an expression of the fact that the real ideology of the countries of the Western conglomerate, led by the USA, is hidden deep and firmly embedded in their constitutions and laws. That ideology has been patiently upgraded and expanded for decades in order to become an untouchable dogma that has elevated itself above all criticisms and condemnations. Quite expectedly, the plutocratic elites are the only ones with a clear motive, almost unlimited means, and the opportunity to create an unconventional and unnatural ideological system that will serve only their interests and which will be impossible to question. It would be very naive to think that this monstrous ideology is an internal problem only for those countries that practice it, because its creators, financiers, and advocates have hegemonic, imperialist, and neocolonialist plans and ambitions for which it was created after all. Aspects of this ideology that are easily recognizable and felt in the internal political life of the countries of the collective West simply serve the purpose of realigning those societies for the continuation of even more aggressive expansions and military interventions.
Andrew Gamble, Professor of Politics at the University of Sheffield and at the University of Cambridge, stated in May 2021 that numerous ideologies have sought to shape Western societies in the past, but that the doctrines of “ordered freedom”, free economies, and strong states, continued to dominate the ideas of “authoritarian nationalism”. Although Gamble sees the role of socialist and conservative ideologies in the countries of the Western Bloc, he recognizes what is often called “Western liberalism” today as an ideological thought that absolutely dominates the political life of the collective West, and it must be recognized that this is an undeniable fact. After all, this is not strange, given that both Western socialists and conservatives not only allowed but also actively helped the permanent incorporation of the ideas of Western liberalism into the laws of their countries. This very fact gives us the impression today that all classical ideologies in the West are dead. Because they are increasingly limited by the constitutions and laws of their countries, Western conservatives and socialists are increasingly difficult to distinguish from liberals, which is why it is more common to talk about left and right liberals instead of real conservatives and socialists. Parties that are truly socialist or conservative are pushed to the margins of political life and often forced to lead an extra-parliamentary political struggle in which they are characterized as extremist and radical. Yet, the real extremists are, in fact, the destroyers of all the traditional values on which civilization was built, namely the advocates and promoters of modern liberalism, which, as we can see, is no longer positioned only on the left but increasingly covers the space of the center-right.
Since liberalism historically arose as a response to absolutist monarchism, and later developed as a reaction to various forms of totalitarianism, it is more than interesting to analyze how it came to be that what is today considered modern liberalism in the West acts precisely from the positions of increasingly radical authoritarianism and dogmatism. Mahatma Gandhi was one of the first great men of history who saw through the hypocrisy of liberalism and understood that crimes committed in the name of liberal democracy are no less terrible than those committed in the name of openly totalitarian ideologies. Nevertheless, when we talk about the criticism of liberalism, the Russian philosopher, political scientist, and university professor Dr. Alexander Dugin left the deepest mark. Dugin quite rightly speaks of the “dictatorship of liberalism” because it is an ideological phenomenon and practice that establishes new totalitarianism in the name of false freedoms, which effectively abolish all real freedoms. Dugin is one of the first theorists who clearly recognized the evolution of original liberal thought from an authentic struggle for individual freedom into the monstrous ideology it is today. He realized that these mutations were so sudden, radical, and dramatic that he called the dominant ideology of the modern West “Liberalism 2.0”. In this way, Dugin wanted to draw a clear historical boundary between the liberalism of the past and the deviant, destructive, and very dangerous liberalism of the present and future. Liberalism 2.0 is, in its essence, pseudo-liberalism, the negation of all real human rights and freedoms, an ideology that has developed a very undemocratic character and does not tolerate any criticism. Nonetheless, since it is protected by very powerful instruments of repression, it has not only its sacred dogmas but also an inquisition that is able to protect them.
Geydar Dzhemal, a Russian Islamic philosopher, admitted, albeit reluctantly, that the civilized world of today is built on the principles of active liberalism. However, he also concluded that Western liberalism, as a mental space, is placed on the platform of denying any higher meaning of life, from which it expresses the conviction that hedonism should be its main dimension. And indeed, hedonism could be considered one of the fundamental principles of modern liberalism, and this becomes more and more evident if one looks at the ideologies that have developed from it, such as LGBT ideology. The Russian poet Yunna Morits, perhaps more artistically intuitively than in the language of political science, speaks through verses about the totalitarian essence of liberalism, which few today can deny and which is its second very important trademark: “Liberal dictatorship, liberal tyranny, liberal Gestapo: whoever is not with them is nowhere!”. For reasons that are certainly interesting to anthropologists, historians, and culturologists, the souls and minds of people from the East, not only top intellectuals but also ordinary people, are naturally very resistant to the dogmas of Western liberalism, which they immediately recognize as something that opposes the divine and natural order of things. This is precisely the reason that the ideas of modern liberalism never managed to take deep roots in countries such as Russia, China, India, or the countries of the Muslim world.
Of course, numerous political minds, scientists, and theorists from the West, whose work and research the mainstream media of the countries they come from, generally ignore or deliberately boycott, have bravely tackled the issue of criticism of modern Western liberalism. One of these very original critics is the philosopher and writer James Kalb, author of “The Tyranny of Liberalism: Understanding and Overcoming Administered Freedom, Inquisitorial Tolerance, and Equality by Command,” published in 2008 and quite popular in Western conservative circles. In this scientific work, Kalb explained how liberalism developed into a form of totalitarianism and dictatorship in which a comprehensive system of control over individuals and all their relationships accounts only to itself and no one else. This is not only the essence of modern Western ideologies and societies but also of all the globalist institutions that they have spawned, which have the ambition to rule the fate of all humanity as “global” without consulting or answering to anyone for their decisions and actions. Another laudable critic who deserves a lot of attention is Patrick J Deneen, an American political theorist and university professor of political science who, ten years after Kalb’s masterpiece on the theory of liberalism, published a landmark book entitled “Why Liberalism Failed.” In his work, Deneen fiercely criticized not only the American Democrats but also the Republicans, claiming that liberalism is a wasted ideology that leads only to inequality, cultural decadence, the erosion of all real human freedoms, and the rise of powerful, centralist, undemocratic bureaucracies. Exactly such bureaucracies also rule the European Union by simply making decisions that bypass all national democracies, while at the same time not accounting to anyone for their actions, no matter how bad they may be, according to the pattern previously noted by Kalb. A very often repeated criticism of numerous other political scientists and theorists, including those from the West, is that all that deepening of social inequalities, denial of traditional values, and corroding of personal freedoms that liberalism undeniably generates will, in the end, like a metastasizing cancer, destroy the states it rules and that ideology itself.
What worries the rest of the world is definitely not that, at a certain moment, this pseudo-liberalism will cease to exist, nor what kind of ideological vacuum will arise in the West after that. The real danger lies in the fact that the ideologies that Western liberalism gave birth to, could continue their lives even after its demise. It is known that the theories of advocates and ideologues of modern liberalism such as Francis Fukuyama, Richard Rorty, John Rawls, and Ronald Dworkin, despite being often far more idealistic than militaristic, have been misused as an excuse for the aggressive military expansion of the collective West. When he spoke about how liberal democracy “will always defeat autocracy”, Jans Stoltenberg, NATO’s 13th Secretary General, by the term “autocracy” meant whatever NATO chooses to call by that name, and what stands between the North Atlantic Alliance as the military fist of the collective West and the resources that the Western conglomerate needs in order to avoid its imminent economic collapse. Therefore, the connection between “Liberalism 2.0” and Western imperialism and neocolonialism is more than direct and obvious, and these extreme ideologies could, unfortunately, survive the collapse of liberal ideology and become a much more serious problem for the unconquered part of mankind. To make matters worse, these are not the only monsters of liberalism that could survive it.
Globalism, systematic and planned Americanization and Westernization, the imposition of Western crypto-satanic pop culture, favoritism of the English language, perverse interpretations of political correctness, militant feminism, aggressive LGBT and gender ideology, the promotion of pedophilia and zoophilia, open Satanism, and who knows what else could crawl out of hell are also dangerous monsters of Western liberalism. These ideologies are manifested together as an attempt to destroy all nations, traditional cultures, and religions by first destroying the traditional family, founded by a man and a woman in the desire to raise offspring together in love and harmony. Pseudo-liberalism, therefore, seeks to “liberate” the individual from that healthy security and support that a natural family provides to a normal human being, replacing it with its freakish surrogates. At the same time, the goal of liberalism is to replace the collectivism of traditional nations, societies, cultures, and religions with corporate collectivism, in which the individual at the “end of history”, will be reduced to a mere property of the company. In order for an individual to be successfully and permanently uprooted from the traditional family environment and turned into a being that can be easily manipulated for the purpose of efficient exploitation, it is necessary to fulfill a whole series of preconditions. Thus, pseudo-liberalism seeks to “liberate” the individual from all true and authentic spirituality and religiosity, from any applicable knowledge other than that which is absolutely necessary for work and production, and from any political awareness of true human rights and freedoms. Such individuals are thus completely denied the right to any kind of true self-realization, and all their life choices are narrowed and reduced to mere production, profitmaking, and consumption. This sinister goal is practically impossible to achieve if parents are not removed from the process of raising children beforehand. In the ideal case, it is necessary to bypass the parents completely and to reach the young people as early as possible, more and more often already in kindergarten, indoctrinating them, first of all, with the destructive poison of LGBT and gender ideology as a guarantee that, by creating very vulnerable individuals, the manipulation of them in the near future will be complete.
What kind of future could be intended for our children, can be guessed from the theses of Yuval Noah Harari, a prominent Israeli liberal thinker, author, publicist, and history professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Harari’s name is often associated with the founder and chairman of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, and many consider him his advisor and right-hand man, but there is no concrete evidence for this. What is indisputable is that Schwab shows great respect for Harari’s work and has invited him to speak at World Economic Forum conferences in Davos on a couple of occasions. In his books, Harari, who is, by the way, openly homosexual and lives with his husband, argues that the idea of man possessing free will has come to an end, although it has been not only present but also very important for centuries in all traditional religions, not only Abrahamic, and considered one of the most precious gifts from God. Harari also denies that human beings possess anything that could be called a human soul and even rejects the idea of a human spirit. Instead of all that, he claims that there is already technology that will reduce human beings to the level of hackable animals with the aim of achieving complete surveillance and control over them — and all that on a massive scale. As an obvious supporter of transhumanism, another monster from the ideological laboratories of liberalism, Harari believes that the vast majority of people on the planet are completely unnecessary and, using the term “useless eaters” for them, recommends video games and drugs as a way of life for future generations. Yes, Western liberalism shows a more than obvious desire to establish full control over our children and their future, and we have to ask ourselves where relativizing their ambitions could lead us in the end. Could genetically modified children be born in the very near future with patented genetic codes protected by copyright that would make these children the property of corporations for their entire lives? Before we completely reject such a possibility as the fruit of a dark imagination from some bizarre sci-fi dystopia, we should once again think deeply about all the great “successes” of the liberal ideology that we have already witnessed.
Projections of our collective fears, which just a few decades ago seemed like mere conspiracy theories that could never come true under any circumstances, are today, unfortunately, part of the gloomy everyday reality in which we live. This forces us to be constantly alert and extremely cautious in relation to all the, at first glance, innovative, advanced, and humane ideas with which liberalism tries to hypnotize and seduce us. Let’s just remember how the idea of creating a global world in which, thanks to technological progress, there is a free and intensive exchange of goods and services was misused. Just as the initial ideas of liberalism, such as the necessity of protecting personal freedoms as the basic purpose of the existence of the state, were twisted into their opposite, so the initial ideas about the necessity of humane globalization were abused for the needs of a hidden neo-colonialist agenda. Instead of all nations benefiting equally from globalization, it has very quickly turned into a system that favors rich countries, while the workforce and resources of poor countries are unscrupulously exploited and their environments irresponsibly destroyed. The spread of liberal capitalism across the planet has turned out to be just a new form of Western expansion and imperialism that very often precedes brutal military interventions. As for the Western concepts of “cultural exchange” and multiculturalism, they have only led to the erosion of authentic, traditional cultures and the imposition of Western standards in everything. Globalism has raised international institutions such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the World Health Organization, the aforementioned World Economic Forum, and others. All these organizations, which increasingly include some organizations that act as specialized agencies of the United Nations (UNESCO, for example), have in common an extremely low level of transparency of their actions and a very undemocratic way of making decisions. Over time, it became more and more obvious that all these “world” organizations are under the strict control of the Western Zionist and Anglo-Saxon plutocratic elites, and that they serve only them. Globalist organizations are nothing but the foundation of some new totalitarian world order and its world government, the last stage of global enslavement and destruction of all free nations.
One of the greatest ideological evils of the modern world, the vanguard and striking fist of liberalism, is LGBT ideology combined with so-called gender ideology — absolute idiocy that defies simple scientific facts, common sense, and traditional values. Those two combined ideologies and their “values” are best accepted in Western Europe, while quite expectedly, in Russia, Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, they encounter very strong resistance. In most cases, aggressive LGBT and gender propaganda in those conservative societies only led to an increase in intolerance in relation to “sodomites”, which is a term that is very often used in those areas for members of the so-called “LGBT community”. This intolerance is particularly related to gender ideology, which denies the obvious fact to every normal human being, namely that there are only two sexes: male and female, and that their purpose is to establish a family on the foundations of mutual love and respect between a woman and a man and to raise offspring in order to prolong the human species. Instead of something that is obvious to everyone, gender ideology propagates that the biological sex that human beings are born with does not necessarily correspond to the gender that they “feel” they belong to. Thus, Pandora’s box was opened to the whole world, although it should have remained closed forever and where it belongs — in psychiatric clinics. Facebook thus, now recognizes 58 different “genders”, other “experts” came up with the figure of 72 “genders,” and the bidding is still going on, so the figure of 100 “genders” has already been exceeded. Gender ideology “experts” such as Diane Ehrensaft, a “gender-affirming” therapist notorious in conservative circles, advocate that children can be given pseudo-medical diagnoses such as “gender dysphoria” — a “mismatch” between biological sex and gender identity, while they are still in preschool. This “diagnosis” later serves as a legal basis for changing the sex of very young children, which is absolutely monstrous. All this transgender insanity, together with the already standard demands of the LGBT population for various privileges, such as the legalization of same-sex marriages and the right to adopt children, is very brazenly and aggressively imposed on all the nations of the planet while totally ignoring their cultural and religious traditions. For example, the European Union allocated 31 million euros for integration, or more precisely, the imposition of LGBT values in traditionally very conservative and patriarchal Armenia, whose national value system is definitely diametrically opposed to the ideology of sodomites. Such violence against traditionalist societies is possible only if a nation has previously fallen under the strong political influence of the collective West and becomes completely economically dependent on it. In that case, such a country renounces its traditional culture and its values, in exchange for new loans that only lead to further indebtedness and de facto slavery. Such a nation can no longer stand up to the ideological pressures of the collective West, no matter how mindless and shameless they are. The people of such countries, of course, strive to preserve their traditional values at all costs, and all this leads to sharp internal conflicts and political instability.
Although the official representatives of the LGBT+ movement firmly and persistently deny it, like with one of their official documents known as the “Pedosexual Statement” of the LGBT Foundation, independent research, such as that conducted by the Regent University School of Law in Virginia, indicates that there is overwhelming evidence that confirms the belief that homosexuality is directly related to pedophilia. This research shows that children are not only the target of recruitment with the aim of constantly expanding the LGBT community, but unfortunately, they are also the object of homosexuals’ sexual desire and brutal sexual abuse. The data obtained by Regent University, which refers to the USA, are more than frightening: for every homosexual male child abuser, there are 150.2 abused boys, while for every heterosexual male child abuser, there are 19.8 girls. Steve Baldwin, the executive director of the Council for National Policy in Washington, DC, reacted to these studies, with the assertion that homosexuality more than obviously destroys the foundations of civilization, by destroying the traditional family and the normal childhood of children. As for pedophilia itself, it is openly promoted under the euphemism, in fact, the synonym “pedosexuality”, as a completely normal form of human sexuality, which should therefore be completely socially acceptable. In the liberal West, there has been a decades-long continuum of legal attempts to legalize pedophilia by gradually lowering the age a child must be to give legally valid consent to sex — without, of course, the right of parents to intervene to protect their children. The LGBT movement threatens children’s mental and physical health in many ways, but by far the most by the already mentioned promotion of transgenderism and gender changes, even among preschool children. And is gender change even possible, and what does it entail? The surgical butchering of one’s genitalia and “hormone therapy” do not result in real gender reassignment because the DNA of every cell of a person who has undergone such a brutal procedure still bears irrefutable evidence of the person’s actual, natural sex. Gender reassignment is, in fact, absolutely impossible and must be considered medical malpractice and a crime, especially if it is carried out on immature children who are easily manipulated. In order to keep all this madness alive, terrifying, persistent, continuous, and ubiquitous propaganda and indoctrination of the entire society is carried out in the countries of the collective West, and these are projects in which millions of dollars are invested in the midst of the global economic crisis.
The refusal of individuals to accept LGBT and gender dogmas is slowly beginning to bring with it certain consequences — often legal ones as well. Refusal to participate in LGBT activities is also seen as an illegal denial and violation of human rights. A good example of the insanity of the system that promotes the LGBT and transgender agendas is the case of 16-year-old Canadian student Josh Alexander. He was suspended last month from St. Joseph’s Catholic High School, only because, in accordance with his Baptist religious upbringing, he claimed that there are only two genders — male and female, which was perceived as psychological bullying and harassment of transgender students. Because of this kind of terror carried out by the liberal states of the West, parents increasingly accept the LGBT and gender “education” of their children, which starts earlier and earlier without much resistance. For example, when it was announced in October last year that the first LGBT-themed kindergarten would be opened in Berlin’s Schöneberg district this spring instead of a boycott, the number of applications was very high from day one. Obviously, in the countries of the collective West, and especially in Western Europe, “voluntary” participation in LGBT activities is increasingly becoming a moral and even legal obligation of every individual, which is better not to oppose. There are other examples as well. On the other side of the ocean, parents reacted violently in June of last year when it was learned that New York City spent over $200,000 for the “expenses” of drag queens who read books to children in public schools without the parents’ knowledge or approval, all within the framework of a program promoting the inclusiveness of “transgender” people. A few years ago, half-naked transsexual dancers, also without the parents’ knowledge, performed dirty dances in front of preschool children in the Manhattan public school talent show. Even Disney joined the campaign to promote LGBT ideology by deciding that as many as 50% of the characters in their cartoons must be members of one of the myriad genders of the LGBT population. All this, for the umpteenth time, confirms the thesis that liberalism really wants to get hold of our children and mold them to their will.
Even sports have not been spared from the onslaught of LGBT propaganda precisely because they are part of the traditional upbringing of children, which helps them grow into healthy and strong young adults. So Thomas Bach, president of the International Olympic Committee, announced in December last year that in the future, 10% of the composition of all national teams will have to be members of the “LGBTQI+ community”. On the other hand, the insanity of transgender ideology has allowed biological men like transgender swimmer Lia Thomas, despite fully justified and very loud protests, not only to compete in female competition but to absolutely dominate it. At a time when the liberal West is ruled by twisted “political correctness”, which considers traditional courtship by men, no matter how polite and cultural, as sexual harassment of women that can be severely punished, Lia Thomas, as a “transgender woman”, is entitled to use the women’s locker room and further humiliate female swimmers by deliberately exposing the nudity of his unmodified male genitalia in front of them — which is exactly what happened last year and was not considered sexual harassment at all. Somewhat similarly, a 31-year-old Dutchman, now named Marjolein Schepers, decided last year to identify himself as a minor girl, and, in cooperation with doctors, began taking “hormonal therapy” to soon become a member of the female teenage football team. So a mature man, to his undisguised delight, now shares a changing room and showers with 15-year-old girls. The list of such deeply disturbing abnormalities is, unfortunately, getting longer every day and begins to drag on endlessly…
The question that cannot be avoided is: why do plutocratic elites invest so much money and effort in promoting the LGBT and gender agendas? It would be more than naive to believe that this is really about humanism, altruism, and the struggle for human rights. Are there not enough homeless and seriously ill people in this world, even in the most developed countries of the West, who need all kinds of help? Is there no reason to improve the rights of workers and provide completely free education to children and young people who deserve it because of their giftedness, success, and invested effort? Isn’t there room to improve existing healthcare systems? As for the promotion of transgender ideology, there is no doubt that overpriced “hormonal therapies” and “gender reassignment” surgeries at the expense of taxpayers are becoming lucrative businesses for the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries, and among the profiteers, there are certainly other profitable businesses such as the porn and sex industries. Regarding the health insurance industry, one more thing becomes very clear. By declaring the former psychiatric diagnoses to be completely normal forms of behavior, which not only do not need any treatment but are even desirable, millions of dollars in savings are achieved, as insurance companies are not obliged to cover the costs of treating the insured. Of course, this leads to the denial of psychiatric and other necessary medical assistance. Instead, LGBT forms of behavior are deliberately popularized, and they, therefore, spread like infectious diseases. However, in addition to the already listed goals of liberal ideologies, one of the most obvious and important goals of such an intense promotion of LGBT and gender ideology is depopulation, apparently, a sacred dogma that plutocratic elites propagate even openly. Elites of course want to control all global resources and the workforce size, and they seem to think that there is really no need to share resources with “useless eaters”, so it is necessary to reduce the number of people several times, regardless of whether it was the infamous “golden billion” or only half a billion as it was written on the Georgia Guidestones, a granite monument in Elbert County, Georgia — whoever financed the erection of that fabulously expensive “monument”: Rosicrucians, Freemasons, Satanists, or members of some other powerful secret society. Even if we were to choose to completely ignore all the numerous conspiracy theories, the vociferous advocates of monstrous liberal theories such as the aforementioned Harari are more than enough to state with great certainty that the threat of some new technological slave-owning system is looming over humanity. That dystopian system of the future would be based on some new diabolical economic arithmetic that is in contradiction with all the needs of man as a free political and spiritual being and “homo religiosus”.
That is why there is no doubt that the main ideological enemies of Western liberalism, which is, in essence, crypto-satanic pseudo-liberal fascism, are traditional and original religious and philosophical teachings, primarily Christianity and Islam, both because of the number of their believers and the geopolitical space they cover. By abusing the practically unlimited political power that gives the liberal ideology in the states of the collective West full control over the legislative, executive, and judicial powers, its advocates and ideologues very brazenly and without any hesitation go so far as to openly try to modify the original religious teachings sacred to believers. The goal is to create “liberalized religions”, whose essence would be diametrically opposed to the values of classical religions. One of the very recognizable trends of such desecration of classical religions is the attempt to create LGBT-friendly Christianity and LGBT-friendly Islam in order to oppose them to the original and traditional religious teachings. In addition, the idea of merging the two new LGBT-friendly religions into a single monstrous, globalist, syncretist concept such as Chrislam is being considered, which is basically the idea of creating an artificial world religion for the purposes of the sinister projects of the plutocratic elites. Can we then be surprised that not so long ago, in the Church of St. Paul in Malmö, Sweden, the first purely LGBT altar with a blasphemous painting appeared? The painting called “Paradise” depicted naked, same-sex couples in passionate, loving embraces in a place that represents a kind of homosexual “Garden of Eden”. A similar scandal occurred in Germany, in central Berlin, on July 1 of last year, when the imams of the Ibn Rushd-Goethe mosque made a very strange decision. A huge flag in the colors of the rainbow was unfurled over the windows of the mosque right before the start of Friday prayers, with the aim of “providing support” to the LGBT community in that city. Despite the fact that this is a scandalous and, for the absolute majority of believers, very offensive perversion of traditional teachings, protests in this and similar cases are generally lukewarm or nonexistent. However, if no one confronts such incidents, which are only the beginning of a massive global campaign, this worrying trend could become the rule and destroy all traditional religions because “the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing” — whoever said it first, Edmund Burke or John F. Kennedy.
All three Abrahamic religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, have a very negative attitude not only towards homosexuality but also towards any other type of sexuality that would be practiced outside of the traditional marital union of a man and a woman, and of course, they recognize the existence of only two natural sexes. However, this does not hinder the promoters of liberalism, who, using the numerous available levers of power, exert strong and continuous pressure on all religious communities so that they incorporate the heretical dogmas of LGBT and gender ideologies into their teachings. So far, the greatest “success” has been achieved among Protestant churches, excluding conservative Evangelical churches, which successfully resist all pressures. Unfortunately, Lutheran, United, and all 20 Reformist Protestant churches have completely opened up to the LGBT community, their ideology, and their practices.
As for the Anglican Communion, which is the third largest in Christianity after the Roman Catholic Church and Orthodox Christianity, a schism began in it due to the bitter disagreement of the bishops precisely over the attempts of the LGBT and gender agenda to penetrate this religious community. The conservative Global Southern Communion of Anglican Churches no longer recognizes the current Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, as “first among equals” following the decision of the Church’s General Synod to allow Anglican priests to bless same-sex spouses. At the beginning of February this year, the Church of England, the mother church of the Anglican Communion “inspired” by gender ideology and its vocabulary, made another huge mistake. Namely, the Church of England decided to depart from the traditional teachings on the basis of which believers addressed God as “Our Father” with the use of the male pronouns “He” and “Him”. Instead, the use of gender-neutral terms and pronouns was proposed, which caused justifiable anger among believers. Much earlier, the Anglican Communion also departed from tradition by allowing women to be ordained as priests. That this great Christian church is in a big spiritual, moral, and theological crisis was definitively confirmed by the ordination of the first transgender Anglican priests in Australia in February last year and in England in January this year.
The powerful Catholic Church has readily and widely opened its doors to all disillusioned Anglican priests, even if they are married, and allows them to remain married as new Catholic priests, although according to a centuries-old rule, Catholic priests unless they are missionaries must live in strict celibacy. However, the Catholic Church also has its big problems, such as numerous scandals with pedophile and homosexual priests, which could probably be the reverse of celibacy as a restraint of natural human needs. Pope Francis has shown himself to be far more liberal than all his predecessors, and in February of this year, he made several very conciliatory statements about members of the LGBT community who are part of the Catholic Church, stressing that God is a father who does not give up his children. Admittedly, he very clearly emphasized that homosexuality is a great sin but not a crime, which is why he called for the repeal of the law that criminalizes LGBT people. However, at the beginning of March this year, Pope Francis finally dared to take a very firm position regarding transgenderism as an ideology, calling it very dangerous and its followers naive if they seek any progress in it. Also advocating for the Catholic Church to show pastoral care for such people, the Pope nevertheless emphasized that gender ideology is as dangerous and destructive as nuclear weapons and genetic manipulation and that it is part of the “global war” against marriage and the family. This way, Pope Francis really touched on the essence of the liberal agenda. Nevertheless, the general impression is that the Catholic Church is now at some kind of turning point in which it will either return to strict original principles or fall into the abyss of liberal ideologies, where new schisms and ruin await it.
Islam, with about 2 billion believers, and Orthodox Christianity, with close to 260 million followers, despite the enormous efforts of Western power centers, show great resistance to all attempts to incorporate LGBT values and gender ideology into the teachings of these two very conservative religious communities. There are very few Islamic and Orthodox Christian theologians who, in relation to the LGBT community, have a slightly more lenient attitude, which, however, is still firmly based on traditional teachings. That is why it was decided to break and destroy Islam by artificially generating fanatical sectarian hatred and starting bloody conflicts between the members of the two major branches of Islam and their numerous schools. It is about the semi-secret operations of the CIA, MI6, and Mossad, which finance and arm radical “Islamist” organizations. On the one hand, it can lead to violent sectarian conflicts among Muslims that can last for decades, and on the other hand, the reputation of Islam is damaged both in the world and among Muslim believers themselves. Namely, Islam, which is really a religion of peace and spirituality thanks to extremists financed by the West, is deliberately and maliciously equated with terrorism, extremism, and violence. In Muslim communities in the West, intensive LGBT and gender propaganda is carried out at the same time, which, at least among ordinary Muslim believers, has allegedly begun to yield results in terms of greater tolerance among Muslims towards members of the LGBT community, but not towards what they do. However, it will be more likely that Muslims in the West simply try to avoid conflict with the governments of the countries in which they live in fear of being accused of radicalism.
Orthodox Christianity is fragmented, weakened, and destroyed in a somewhat different way: by the deliberate creation of schisms and disputes of a political nature between the canonically recognized autocephalous churches, which are organized according to historical, territorial, or national principles, and the artificial creation of non-canonical churches motivated by purely political decisions. Three years ago, the CIA, probably very deliberately, with the intention of causing a stir in Orthodox Christendom, for the first time publicly released documents about its earlier connections with the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Constantinople, at a time when the Ecumenical Patriarch was Athenagoras I. During the Second World War, Athenagoras I voluntarily began cooperation with the American secret services and continued to work for them until his death in 1972. Although there is no concrete evidence that the current Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I is a CIA collaborator like his predecessor, the fact that he is in a protracted conflict with the Russian Orthodox Church, against whom he leads his personal, fierce crusade, makes him, at the very least, a person who is the favorite of the collective West and who is also in an ideal place to deliver Orthodox Christianity into the hands of the collective West. Thus, Bartholomew I, beyond his canonical authority, declared the autocephaly of the non-canonical so-called “Orthodox Church of Ukraine” in addition to the already existing and recognized canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church, which operates under the jurisdiction of the Moscow Patriarchate. That new, non-canonical Ukrainian church was previously created under the patronage of the collective West by the unification of two schismatic, unrecognized, self-proclaimed religious organizations. All this encouraged the Latvian parliament to declare the Latvian Orthodox Church autocephalous, even though it had absolutely no right to do so. These precedents pave the way for further fragmentation of Orthodox Christianity in order to facilitate its union with the Vatican in the name of ecumenism. In the second phase, it would lead to the fall of that “United Christendom” under the control of liberal plutocratic elites and their ideologies. The goal is that in the end, the Russian Orthodox Church, which is beyond the reach of the collective West, remains completely isolated, as weak as possible, and deprived of the great reputation and influence it once had in the Orthodox Christian world.
The collective West’s war against traditional religions has several goals. The first is certainly the modification of thousand-year-old traditions and their destruction by incorporating modern, pseudo-liberal, crypto-satanic dogmas into them. This further inevitably leads to dramatic, tectonic splits, the disintegration of traditional religious organizations, followed by deep disappointments of true believers, which would bring liberal ideology very close to giving its greatest enemy, traditional religions, a deadly blow with the intention of opening space for numerous syncretistic, crypto-satanic, openly satanic, and numerous other bizarre and unorthodox cults and sects that the centers of power in the West will be able to easily manage and consequently, exercise complete control over individuals. Western liberalism is the great evil of the modern world, which, with the enormous financial resources of the plutocratic elites behind it, can afford excellent political marketing that is not so easy to resist. That pseudo-liberal fascism has elevated itself above humanity and its real freedoms and needs. Like some huge, global Procrustean bed, western liberalism either cuts off the heads of thinking people who are too big for it or, by stretching, breaks those who are ordinary, simple, natural, and therefore too small. And yet, thanks to tireless and highly professional propaganda, the ideological products of liberalism, in their very attractive packages of false promises and fake freedoms without responsibility and consequences, coated with a sweet glaze of hedonism in the pink color of debauchery, successfully conceal their deeply impure and disgusting essence and the bitterness of slavery in total ignorance and dehumanization.
In his historic speech on September 30 last year, at a ceremony in the Kremlin, on the occasion of the unification of the Donetsk People’s Republic, the Luhansk People’s Republic, Kherson, and Zaporozhye regions with the Russian Federation, Russian President Vladimir Putin clearly hinted at the birth of a new and better world based on the old and well-verified values. By talking about Russia fully returning to its conservative traditions, Vladimir Putin has, accidentally or not, encouraged numerous other Eurasian, African, and Latin American states that are in more or less open conflict with the collective West to do the same. A large number of these nations are today at a major historical turning point where they will be forced to make a final choice. They now have the option of choosing to join formal and informal alliances of equal and sovereign nations that cherish traditional values, with all the inevitable difficulties and costs of such a choice. The second, seemingly easier path, at the end of which the highest price of all will be paid, is the acceptance of integration with the collective West, which inevitably leads to the death of all nations and their traditional cultures. After what happened to the nations of the European Union, not a single nation will consciously choose its disappearance, and therefore, nothing will be able to stop the awakening of a new, brave, and unconquerable world. It is a world that is ready to resist and defy American hegemony and Western imperialism at any cost because it clearly sees what fate would befall it otherwise. The seeds of the new ideology are germinating in the hearts of billions of ordinary people, and although this ideology is still nameless and informal, it will soon be able to not only give itself a good name but also clearly define its goals. Unlike Western liberalism, whose power lies in brutal financial and military power that is manifested by violence against nature in and around people, the strength of that new ideology that is being born before our eyes will rest precisely on the old, conservative, traditional values that have been tempered for thousands of years and which the collective West has so lightly rejected and is now zealously trying to destroy. That ideology of the free world is based on simple common sense, nobility, and the love of small, ordinary people instead of the greed and madness of members of powerful elites who strive to become gods and rule by creating some new unnatural laws. In this ideology, a woman and a man, mom and dad, get married because they love and respect each other and because they want to raise children in the warmth of the home in the same old, good, proven way that our ancestors have done since the beginning of time. That brave, unconquerable world resolutely rejects Americanization, Westernization, and the vile globalist agenda, whose essence is deeply neocolonial from the very beginning. It is a world that preserves and nurtures the endless wealth of its traditional national cultures and religions, striving for true freedom and equality of sovereign nations, respect, and brotherhood among people and nations. It is that multipolar world that rises unstoppably above the shackles of slavery that were intended for it and contemptuously rejects chauvinism, racism, and extremism by building new, strong, and magnificent bridges of trust and cooperation through Eurasian, African, and Latin American integrations. It is that brave, unconquerable world of the near future that will win!
U.S. Ambassador Hill is sending a message to the Serbs that they should not do what they want to do but they should do what he wants them to do.
Just less than a decade ago, Dusko Markovic, the last prime minister of ‘Montenegro’, the country established in place of what used to be and has always been Crna Gora (and is now mercifully back on the historical and political maps), back then contrived by Milo Djukanovic‘s DPS political party, Markovic bragged about something that an intelligent person would well and truly be ashamed of, that more than 85% of the people of Montenegro were against Montenegrin government’s recognition of Kosovo as an independent state back then. But he said (somewhat sneeringly): ”We did recognize it nonetheless’ They had a vision to do exactly that – he said so emboldened by this ‘success’, they, in the same ‘visionary’ way, could conveniently do away with the Serbian Orthodox Church in Montenegro ‘in one leisurely sweep’, which (the Serbian Orthodox Church in the newly identity-ed Montenegro) reminds them all in a rather uncomfortable way that Kosovo is Serbia after all and that Njegoš and the King Nikola knew that historical fact centuries ago. And those Crnogorci (who do not know the truths which Njegoš and King Nikola knew cannot essentially and truly ‘be’ Crnogorci any more after they had ceased to be Serbs as well. Anyhow, who are they indeed if not who Njegoš and King Nikola were? It is common knowledge that he used to go ‘namo, ‘namo da vidju Prizren…(6). because Kosovo is mine and ours and I belong to it and oнамо покој добићу души, кад Србин више не буде роб.
Thus, there emerges a justifiable question.’ When did the country of Crna Gora come to be if it is not in any way the same as or similar to who King Nikola used to be during his reign? Shortly afterwards, the unwavering people’s litije began – long, nationwide processions of Serbian Orthodox Church believers in pious pursuit to protect and defend the Serbian Orthodox Church and its thousands of holy places of worship and Montenegro did, commensurate to how much is ‘allowed by the NATO standards’ slowly begin retrieving its Crna Gora centuries-old, historical and political identity.
Therefore, this case of Crna Gora is most precious due to the fact that the same issue is hovering in the political mid-air above Serbia too. It is called the French – German Plan, which has unwittingly evolved into the European Plan in the meantime. It is heavily supported by the USA so it could be conveniently called the NATO plan as well. Let me remind you, NATO is the military pact which committed a brutal act of aggression on SR Yugoslavia (N.B. the official union of Serbia and Montenegro at the time) in order to eventually rip Kosovo and Metohija away from us, the Serbs. In brief, this NATO plan is now for the rest of the then Yugoslavia, which is in fact Serbia now, after Crna Gora had already done it, to recognize that Kosovo does not belong to Serbia any more. They want us to believe that it is not ours any more but theirs. What (utterly lackluster) Dusko Markovic called a ‘vision’, the EU mediator Miroslav Lajcak describes as a difficult decision to make, yet the crux of the matter is the same. Namely, we the Serbs are ordered to do what the Serbian people are absolutely against. It seems that a ‘particular’ kind of ‘democracy’ is that in which these all manner of ‘envoys and leaders’ of all sorts do not act in accordance with the will of the Serbian people but completely contrary to it.
In Serbian language we interpret this sort of (arrogant doublespeak) approach as: subjugation. The U.S. ambassador in Belgrade, Christopher Hill seems to have thought it was incumbent upon him on that count to approach us in a certain weekly magazine with his address to the Serbs in this way as follows: ‘I had heard people talking about sovereignty in the Balkans, and I would always ask the same question ‘How come some other countries in the Western Europe as small as Serbia do not worry about their own sovereignty?’ Italian Minister of Foreign Affairs Antonio Tajani elaborated further on what that truly meant. Europe does not have a real foreign and defense policy. We always follow in the (political) footsteps of the USA – he told the Italian reporters of La Stampa. Ramush Haradinaj said something very similar a few years ago in the capacity of the then prime minister of the pseudo state of Kosovo, though we laughed at him back then. Now we understand that this aberration is more common than we thought. There seem to be some nations who welcome their usurpers of their own land with joy. They threw flowers at the Germans when the Germans entered Maribor (Slovenia) or Zagreb (Croatia), for instance. The very same Germans threw bombs at Belgrade (Serbia) at the time. Slovenia and Croatia are now NATO members jumping with the very same joy. (Macedonia and Montenegro were swindled into NATO in the meantime). And yet again all of them are together on their Generalplan Ost onward march against Russia. But we (the Serbs) again bang on stubbornly about our sovereignty, eh? That is the reason why the Germans, and the Germans always follow in the footsteps of the Americans, just like the Italians and Ramush Haradinaj do, as one of the conditions and there were seven of these conditions in total, they asked for our mindset to change. But, we adamantly refuse to forget our past and our history and surely not their bombs.
Adrian Schockenhoff, Bundestag and Chancellor Angela Merkel’s envoy to Serbia a decade ago or so, demanded exactly that in all seriousness, and he even committed that demand to paper, translated into Serbian. He handed it out to the reporters so as to avoid any possible misconstructions lost in translation. It happened in 2012 because a little earlier in 2010 we did not obey the commands by Wolfram Mass (the German ambassador in Serbia before him) He said ‘I have to voice my criticism of the Serbian authorities for still using the terms such as NATO bombing. Imagine that you walk along Knez Milos Street and your child asks you ‘Daddy, who did this?’ (showing the buildings torn down by the NATO bombing). You would respond ‘ NATO did ‘. What do you expect your child to think of NATO then? Unlike this particular situation, when I was a child, says Mass, I used to see some ruins in Germany but I did not hate those who did it because there were others there who were able to explain to me why they did that. He then added that the European and NATO integrations are interconnected, because the issue of Serbia joining NATO is not a matter of ‘if’ but of ‘when’, regardless of what we think about that. (Truth be told) that means subjugation for the Serbs and we are not having it!
The very same things are now demanded by the U.S. Ambassador Hill, after he sent a message to the Serbs that we should not do what we want to do but we should do what he wants us to do; he explained to us ‘in a nice way’ (as if we would fall for Hill’s niceties) that Serbia is now at its most important pathway in its history, towards joining Euro-Atlantic integration, including EU of course… and including NATO of course. That is the true meaning of the Euro-Atlantic integration. That is the reason why, the (infamous) ambassador complained to that Belgrade weekly magazine: ‘It was the greatest disappointment for me that the matters which I thought had been resolved a long time ago, are still fresh in the minds and memories of the locals. I was surprised when I came here last March that there were some remembrances of 1999 on a regular daily basis. You have to look into the future! This geographic region is packed with history. One should respect history but one should not be its hostage.’
Moreover, Alexander Botsan-Kharchenko, Russian Ambassador in Serbia, warned that Hill would like to erase historical memory of brutal atrocities committed on the Serbs and our tragically lost lives taken away by NATO. And indeed, if history is the life’s teacher, which it is, where would these history teachers (such as the arrogant, infamous Hill) take us in the future, and where would the likes of those who would like to erase our history take us? When they place us, that is, on that most important pathway in our history, the way Hill depicts it. To be something we have never been before, the generations of Serbs who willingly renounce its own Kosovo and Metohija, rather than simply singing patriotic songs about Kosovo at least, waiting for the ‘Dogodine u Prizrenu’. When would the history of the Serbs in that case (the way Christopher Hill wants us to see it) begin the same as in the case of those Montenegrini in Crna Gora?
We would renounce Kosovo and (in that far-fetched scenario of theirs) we would renounce our centuries old Serbian Kosovo, pre-Battle of Kosovo cantos and post-Battle of Kosovo cantos of epic poetry from our folklore national heritage, what would in that case our children learn in Serbian language classes in school? And the famed epic poem quote ‘Kasno Marko na Kosovo stize’ would not be ours anymore because we are not Marko’s own people any more. ‘Pocetak Bune protiv Dahija‘ would not feature in our Serbian language and literature classes anymore because even there we recite poetry and sing songs about King Lazar, Milos Obilic and Kosovo and our liberation from the Ottoman Turks and then onward to the revenged Kosovo in 1912. Yet, the likes of Christopher Hill want us to believe that those appear to have been some other Serbs and not us. The same as what happened in 1999 and 2006 when the Constitution of Serbia was passed, our Serbian most beloved and revered Patriarch Pavle also voted for it and led the whole nation in their pious pursuit, because the Constitution says that Kosovo is the heartland of Serbia, be it with its essential autonomy.
Yet, this is a kind reminder that in 2008 there seemed to have been ‘some other Serbs’ who rejected rather than accepted in total subjugation the self-proclaimed pseudo state of Kosovo.
If we were to obey what Hill orders us to do and the likes of him preaching about the life lessons, and all the other thieves of our history and our land, if we were to make those tough choices with which Miroslav Lajcak relentlessly continues to threaten us, if they were to blindingly blur the scope of our vision which Dusko Markovic had, we would become but sheer subjugated slaves who, because they do not have the past anymore, cannot have the future either ‘the future which is in our own hands and not the hands of others. Of course for the sake of the interests of others (i.e. the interests of NATO, USA and EU and surely not our own). To the Serbs, it feels far more like freedom to be the hostage of our history. It is ours at least. And history is a life’s teacher, way better than Ambassador Hill, Wolfram Mass and all the rest of those who would rather brutally and illegally seize and plunder our land and distort our mindsets. our world views and our consciousness in such a way that we start thinking (mistakenly) that we deserve it all.
Of course if you believe propaganda allegedly originating from British intelligence you would think the Russians are losing and that Wagner forces will withdraw and redeploy to Africa. This sort of nonsense contributes nothing to understanding factually what is going on in Ukraine and is a disservice to concerned citizens. (See for example this story in Breitbart).
…
If Ukraine does call off any offensive to relieve Bakhmut, then the US/NATO plan for an attack on Crimea remains credible. However, the risk of a very large scale Russian encirclement of Ukraine’s forces could force a change of plans.
El mandatario resaltó que Washington está creando nuevas alianzas, lo que permite a los analistas y politólogos occidentales afirmar que Occidente está construyendo un nuevo eje.
El presidente ruso, Vladímir Putin, ha subrayado que las acusaciones de que la cooperación entre Rusia y China es una alianza militar son absolutamente falsas.
En una entrevista en el canal de televisión Rossiya-24 este domingo, cuando se le preguntó si la cooperación de Moscú y Pekín supone una amenaza para Occidente, el mandatario ruso comentó: “Al fin y al cabo, no estamos creando ninguna alianza militar con China. Sí, también cooperamos en el ámbito de la cooperación técnico-militar, no lo ocultamos, pero es transparente, no hay nada secreto”, indicó.
Asimismo, el mandatario resaltó que EE.UU. está creando nuevas alianzas, lo que permite a los analistas y politólogos occidentales afirmar que Occidente está construyendo un nuevo eje. Como ejemplo, Putin citó a la “OTAN global”, un nuevo concepto de desarrollo de alianza militar según el cual Occidente planea desarrollar relaciones con los países de la región de Asia-Pacífico.
“Por eso los propios analistas occidentales -no nosotros, sino ellos- dicen que Occidente está empezando a construir un nuevo eje, similar al creado en los años 1930 por la Alemania e Italia fascistas y el Japón militarista“, añadió.
Aside from armor-penetrating tank rounds, the US uses DU ammunition for its 30mm GAU-8 Avenger Gatling gun on the A-10 Warthog ground attack jet fighter. The A-10s figured prominently in the Iraq wars and in Afghanistan.
Ukraine last winter requested 100 A-10 jets from the United States and have been secretly training to use the aircraft in combat. If a Crimea offensive takes place, the A-10 may be moved into Ukraine and flown by a combination of Ukrainian pilots and possibly by volunteer former US Air Force pilots.
…
How will Russia answer these latest developments? Putin has already sent a warning to Britain about DU ammunition, although what he actually has in mind is not clear. If Russia is watching US activity in rushing the Abrams tanks to the battlefield, including the possibility of the A-10, the situation will get more heated.
Afrika steht erneut im Fokus europäischer Mächtiger und deutscher Ohnmächtiger. Kolonialismus war vorgestern, Entwicklungshilfe gestern. Morgen geht es um die Ausbeutung von Afrikas Energiepotenzialen, nachdem man russische Energie nicht mehr haben will – selbst zu sehr günstigsten Konditionen nicht. Um alle Wiederbelebungsversuche diesbezüglich im Keim zu ersticken, wurde sogar die Ostseepipeline gesprengt. Nun geht Habeck, seines Zeichens Bundesminister fürs Abwirtschaften und Klimaschutz, auf (CO2-neutrale?) Reisen in aller Herren Länder; darunter viele islamische, nicht nur in Afrika.
Die ebenfalls grüne Ministerin des Äußersten, Annalena Baerbock, ist noch in weiterer Mission in Afrika unterwegs. Diese Woche war zu erfahren, sie wolle Uganda und andere Länder vom Segen der deutschen Regenbogenpolitik überzeugen. In den islam-grünen Ländern Nordafrikas kann sie damit keinen Blumentopf gewinnen. So versucht sie es in den mittelafrikanischen Ländern wie Uganda, das noch zu drei Vierteln christlich ist, aber auch schon zu zwölf Prozent muslimisch. Gemeinsam mit den USA droht sie dem Land „Konsequenzen“ an, wenn dieses mit seinem Anti-LGBTQ-Gesetz ernst machen sollte. Sieht sie sich dazu möglicherweise im Recht, weil die ugandische Flagge ebenfalls schwarz-rot-gold-farben ist?
Ins Handwerk pfuschen
Und pfuscht sie ihrem Parteikollegen Habeck damit nicht ins Handwerk? Denn Uganda verfügt über Kupfer, Kobalt, Nickel und Steinsalz, welche in nicht unerheblichen Mengen für die Energiewende gebraucht werden. Oder steht das Land etwa auf dem grünen Index, weil im Jahre 2009 große Öl- und Erdgasvorkommen entdeckt wurden? Die gesicherten Reserven belaufen sich auf mindestens 700 Millionen Barrel Öl. Oder sind Öl-Länder nur dann gute Länder, wenn es sich um arabische Länder handelt, in denen Habeck auch schon in peinlicher Katzbuckelei hausieren war? Doch dieser konzentriert sich in seiner Not erst einmal auf Südafrika und die westafrikanischen Länder Namibia und Marokko.
Folgendes scheint er nicht zu bedenken, oder es ist ihm egal: “Islam-extremistische Angreifer dringen inzwischen in die westafrikanischen Küstenländer Guinea, Elfenbeinküste, Ghana, Togo und Benin vor”, berichtete “Open Doors” und rief deshalb die Christen in aller Welt am vergangenen Mittwoch auf, dafür zu beten, dass sich „der Friedensfürst den Kämpfern in den Weg stellt“.
Wer ist hier “Friedensfürst”?
Mit dem Friedensfürsten ist aber nicht der globale Westen gemeint – denn dieser zieht sich vor der Ausbreitung des Islam in der Sahelzone bis Zentralafrika nach Süden und Westen immer mehr feige zurück – wie das Beispiel Mali zeigte. Auch der Papst ist mit dem Friedensfürst sicher nicht gemeint, da er ganz andere Sorgen zu haben scheint, als die Ausbreitung des Islam zu Lasten der Christen zu stoppen. Zum Beispiel, dass Muslime gesegnetes Ramadan feiern und vor allem immer mehr von ihnen auf “sicheren Korridoren” nach Europa gelangen.
Abschließend die ketzerische Frage: Rechtfertigt die geschürte Angst vor dem “Klimawandel” eigentlich alle Mittel – auch den Austausch unserer Energielieferanten aus bisher geographisch, historisch und kulturell nahestehenden Ländern durch solche aus fernen Ländern, von denen man nicht ansatzweise weiß, ob und wie sie die Menschenrechte respektieren? Oder von denen man im Gegenteil sogar ganz genau weiß, dass sie nicht besser sind als jene, was jedoch ignoriert wird, weil die Agenda der alles beherrschenden USA keine andere Wahl lässt? Haben wir wirklich keine andere Wahl?
La gente escucha un discurso del líder del movimiento popular yemení Ansarolá, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, en Saná, capital de Yemen, 17 de enero de 2023.
El líder del movimiento popular yemení Ansarolá, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, denunció que Estados Unidos pretende controlar los recursos petroleros de Yemen.
“Los estadounidenses y sus mercenarios buscan ocupar nuestro país y controlar sus recursos y riquezas petroleras”, advirtió Al-Houthi en un discurso pronunciado el sábado en ocasión del octavo aniversario de la agresión militar liderada por Arabia Saudí y respaldada por EE.UU. contra su país.
Arabia Saudí y sus aliados comenzaron en marzo de 2015 una campaña de ofensivas militares para aplastar a Ansarolá y devolver al poder en Yemen a Abdu Rabu Mansur Hadi, un antiguo aliado de Washington y Riad. No obstante, los agresores no han logrado sus objetivos pese a ocho años de guerra que ha dejado más de 18 000 yemeníes muertos, incluidos 4000 niños.
“La mayoría de las bombas que han matado a nuestros hijos durante la guerra son de fabricación estadounidense, y han sido lanzadas desde aviones de combate estadounidenses mediante el entrenamiento y la supervisión de los estadounidenses”, recalcó el dirigente yemení.
Al-Houthi subrayó que el único camino hacia la paz es detener los ataques de la coalición liderada por Riad, levantar el bloqueo, poner fin a la ocupación, comenzar la reconstrucción de Yemen y completar el proceso de intercambio de prisioneros.
Sin embargo, el líder de Ansarolá señaló que Estados Unidos sigue insistiendo en prolongar esta agresión militar, aun a sabiendas de que la continuación de la guerra tendrá graves consecuencias económicas y de seguridad para Arabia Saudí.
En este sentido, destacó que los combatientes yemeníes están preparados y cuentan con todo tipo de armas necesarias para defender a su patria.
“Entramos en el noveno año con un Ejército organizado que adquirió experiencia sobre el terreno tras ocho años y pasó de las tácticas de defensa a las tácticas ofensivas y las grandes operaciones”, recalcó.
Sólo Rusia puede ser garante de la paz a orillas del río Dniéster y asegurar la estabilidad en la zona de seguridad, declaró el 25 de marzo el copresidente de la Comisión Mixta de Control (CMC) sobre la gestión de la operación de mantenimiento de la paz en Transnistria, Oleg Belyakov, en el programa “Charla especial” del canal de televisión “Primero Transnistria”.
Cuando Moldavia dice que tiene que salirse del acuerdo de 1992 sobre los principios del arreglo pacífico del conflicto armado, demuestra que quiere sacar a Rusia de la región, aunque es un país garante que puso fin al conflicto armado y sentó a Moldavia y Transnistria en la mesa de negociaciones, afirmó el copresidente del CMC.
Al organizar las conversaciones de paz, Rusia garantizó la vigilancia de la zona de contacto creando un contingente de mantenimiento de la paz de las tres partes: Rusia, Moldavia y Transnístria. Este mecanismo también garantiza la seguridad controlando que nadie acumule fuerzas militares en la zona de seguridad para que nadie provoque un nuevo conflicto, dijo el representante del CMC.
Si Moldavia abandona el acuerdo, las partes volverán a tener relaciones al nivel de 1992, en las que no habrá garantías de que “una de las partes no introduzca fuerzas militares, vehículos blindados en la zona de seguridad” y no provoque un conflicto armado, afirmó el copresidente del CMC.
“El principal eslabón garante lo garantiza la Federación Rusa, que es el país garante, el acuerdo de 1992, el desarrollo del acuerdo, todos los documentos, elaborados durante bastante tiempo y la participación de los contingentes militares de las tres partes”, – dijo Belyakov.
El 16 de marzo, el ex embajador de Moldavia en EEUU, Igor Munteanu, pidió al gobierno moldavo que se retirara del Acuerdo sobre los principios para el arreglo pacífico del conflicto armado en la región de Transnistria, de 21 de julio de 1992.
Ante la multitud de testimonios que se recogen por los periodistas en las zonas desocupadas del nazi-otanismo de las Repúblicas Populares de Donetsk y Lugansk, y la avalancha de testimonios publicados en redes sociales de habla rusa, RT ha puesto a disposición de sus lectores los vídeos cortos que habitualmente preparan para ilustrar sus artículos o como inserciones en su material televisivo.
24.03.2023 La persecución de sacerdotes de la Iglesia Ortodoxa Ucraniana está cobrando fuerza en Ucrania.
Reproductor de vídeo
Las siguientes imágenes de la región de Chernivtsi muestran cómo la policía empuja y agrede al sacerdote durante un oficio mientras los feligreses intentan protegerle. Las fuerzas de seguridad interrumpieron el servicio en un intento de apoderarse de la iglesia y entregarla a los cismáticos de la Iglesia Ortodoxa de Ucrania. El arcipreste les persuadió durante media hora para que al menos le permitieran terminar el servicio, según la diócesis de Chernivtsi. ———-
23/03/2023 Mientras los ucranianos son apresados en las calles y enviados al frente, y los soldados se quejan de que se les utilizan como carne de cañón, el secretario del Consejo de Seguridad Nacional y Defensa, Alexéi Danílov, declara a los medios de comunicación que “todo va según lo previsto”.
Reproductor de vídeo
———-
23/03/2023 Militares rusos dieron cobijo a un ganso que encontraron en una posición ucraniana abandonada.
Reproductor de vídeo
Le dieron el nombre de “Drone” y proporcionaron al animal un cómodo alojamiento junto al puesto de control donde prestan servicio. El ganso de combate está acostumbrado a tratar a los soldados como si fueran su propio rebaño y los sigue a todas partes. ———-
22/03/2023 Han aparecido en Internet imágenes que muestran la entrega a Ucrania de un convoy de vehículos blindados extranjeros.
Reproductor de vídeo
La mayor parte del convoy está formado por camionetas estadounidenses Humvee (HMMWV). A pesar de que el Humvee se considera un vehículo altamente protegido, los militantes ucranianos ya han grabado un vídeo en el que se ve cómo fragmentos de proyectiles rusos atraviesan el Humvee. Cabe destacar que los Humvees están pintados con camuflaje de arena, aunque en condiciones normales, las Fuerzas Armadas de Ucrania repintan de verde los vehículos estadounidenses. La coloración de arena convierte a los vehículos en un blanco fácil para los drones y aumenta sus posibilidades de caer bajo el fuego. ———-
21/03/2023 Uno contra la multitud: un soldado ruso capturó en solitario una trinchera enemiga cerca de Kremennaya.
Reproductor de vídeo
Las imágenes de un dron muestran cómo el combatiente, Alexander Maltsev, se acercó sigilosamente a una trinchera llena de combatientes enemigos, saltó dentro y comenzó a avanzar, destruyendo a todo el que se resistía a su paso. Cuando dos soldados ucranianos salieron con las manos en alto, el soldado raso los hizo prisioneros. ———-
20/03/2023 El ejército ruso dio las gracias a los contribuyentes estadounidenses por el FGM-148 Javelin capturado y prometió utilizarlo al máximo.
Reproductor de vídeo
Un sistema portátil de misiles antitanque fue abandonado por los soldados ucranianos antes de retirarse. Esta arma cuesta al menos 150.000 dólares. Ahora será utilizada por el ejército ruso. ———-
18/03/2023 Ha aparecido en Internet un vídeo de militantes ucranianos en el que desafiantes cortan manteca en el Corán.
Reproductor de vídeo
De las imágenes se desprende claramente que robaron el libro a un soldado ruso muerto. Este acto fue condenado severamente por el jefe de la República de Chechenia, Ramzan Kadyrov, que prometió hacer todo lo posible para castigar a los militantes de las Fuerzas Armadas de Ucrania que profanaron el libro sagrado de los musulmanes. ———-
17/03/2023 En la ciudad rusa de Vladivostok se rodó un vídeo atmosférico con la participación de un helicóptero Ka-52 sobre la helada bahía de Amur.
Reproductor de vídeo
El Ka-52, también conocido como Alligator, es un helicóptero de reconocimiento y ataque de fabricación rusa. Mostró por primera vez su potencia durante las operaciones de combate en Siria. El Ka-52 se utiliza para destruir tanques enemigos, así como vehículos blindados y no blindados. El helicóptero está equipado con misiles supersónicos guiados Vikhr-1 que pueden penetrar casi un metro de blindaje, y varios otros tipos de misiles. Además de su poder de ataque, el Alligator también se utiliza para reconocimiento, y es capaz de detectar equipos enemigos a una distancia de entre 25 km y 30 km. El Ka-52 y su versión mejorada, el Ka-52M, se utilizan en la zona de operaciones militares especiales, donde contribuyen a garantizar la seguridad de militares y civiles. ———-
14/03/2023 Aparecieron en Internet imágenes que mostraban cómo una mujer que intentaba llegar a un mitin en Chisinau era hospitalizada tras un enfrentamiento con un policía.
Reproductor de vídeo
El vídeo muestra que la mujer tropezó y cayó al suelo, y luego un hombre le cayó encima desde arriba.
En ese momento, en una concentración en Chisinau, los manifestantes exigieron a las autoridades que pagaran a los ciudadanos las facturas de los servicios públicos correspondientes a los meses de invierno. La acción terminó con la adopción por los manifestantes de una resolución en la que exigían una respuesta en 24 horas. ———-
11/03/2023 El diseñador y bloguero Artemy Lebedev habló sobre la promoción de Louis Vuitton, en la que muchos usuarios vieron un acto de apoyo a Rusia.
Reproductor de vídeo
Lebedev participa regularmente en las retransmisiones de RT que cubren acontecimientos en el mundo. El bloguero señaló que, aparte de los ciudadanos de Ucrania, nadie vio apoyo a Rusia en la promoción de Louis Vuitton. Añadió que mucha gente haría bien en estudiar geografía, y en particular las banderas de los países, ya que la promoción mostraba la bandera de Francia, no la de Rusia, y la letra V simboliza la Quinta República Francesa. ———-
10/03/2023 En el batallón cosaco “Yenisei”, el más multinacional, luchan junto a los rusos armenios y azerbaiyanos, uzbekos y tayikos, georgianos y abjasios.
Reproductor de vídeo
A pesar de la diferencia de fe y mentalidad, ante todo son cosacos, explicó uno de los combatientes. Los cosacos se sientan juntos en las trincheras, comen, descansan y luchan. “Somos como hermanos, de verdad. Nos cubrimos las espaldas, nos sacamos mutuamente del peligro. Los cosacos no abandonan a los suyos”, añadió el militar. ———-
09/03/2023 Un grupo de saboteadores ucranianos penetró por la frontera en el pueblo ruso de Lyubechane, en la región de Briansk. Según el jefe de la región, los militantes mataron a dos hombres e hirieron a un niño de 10 años.
Reproductor de vídeo
Los neonazis difundieron dos vídeos en los que afirmaban falsamente que “no matan a los desarmados”. Al mismo tiempo, uno fue grabado con el telón de fondo de una oficina de correos, y otro – en el punto médico local. ———-
08/03/2023 “No quiero más sangre en la ropa de los niños”: soldados de varias regiones de Rusia participan en la zona de operaciones militares especiales.
Reproductor de vídeo
A pesar de todas las diferencias, les une un objetivo: cada uno de ellos desea un cielo en paz sobre las cabezas de sus seres queridos. Para lograr este objetivo, arriesgan sus vidas en la lucha contra el régimen neonazi ucraniano. ———-
05/03/2023 El diputado, periodista y presentador de televisión ruso Piotr Tolstói ridiculizó los intentos de Occidente de “anular” la cultura rusa.
Reproductor de vídeo
En su discurso a los líderes occidentales, el político les animó a ser coherentes e ir más allá de los ataques al arte y la literatura rusos. Tolstoi sugirió que Europa y Estados Unidos dejaran de utilizar todos los logros de la cultura y la ciencia rusas, así como todas las tecnologías que se crearon sobre su base. La lista resultó ser bastante impresionante. ———-
Davor Slobodanovich Vuyachich
La gente escucha un discurso del líder del movimiento popular yemení Ansarolá, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, en Saná, capital de Yemen, 17 de enero de 2023.
Der Friedensstifter 