Nazi Brotherhood: American Media Ignore Atomwaffen’s Plot for a Baltimore Terror Attack

Felix Livshitz

Atomwaffen’s plot in Baltimore should have been headline news

American far-right radicals – linked to neo-Nazis from the Ukrainian Azov Battalion – have been charged with conspiring to stage a terrorist attack in Baltimore, Maryland. However, US media reporting on the story does not mention connections between the group and the militants.

Additionally, the attempted terrorist act may only be the first signs of the threat that Azov members, and their foreign friends, pose to Western countries.

Failed plans

In early February, the US Justice Department announced the indictment of neo-Nazis Sarah Beth Clendaniel and Brandon Clint Russell for conspiracy to destroy energy substations in Baltimore. Authorities describe the pair’s plans as “driven by their ideology of racially-motivated hatred.” If convicted, they each face a maximum sentence of 20 years.

Beginning in June 2022, though possibly earlier, the pair plotted a series of attacks against substations using balloons and rifle fire with the goal of shorting out power transformers and depriving thousands of residents of light and heat. They specifically aimed to carry this out “when there is greatest strain on the grid” and energy demand was highest.

Russell shared maps of planned targets with Clendaniel, outlining how even low-level strikes on electrical substations could cause a “cascading failure” across Baltimore’s entire electricity grid, an impact that would be maximized by hitting multiple sites simultaneously. Clendaniel envisioned the plan would “permanently completely lay this city to waste.” in supposedly encrypted messaging app chats.

To jail and back again

Russell is the founder of Atomwaffen Division, also known as the National Socialist Resistance Front, an international neo-Nazi terrorist network. In January 2018, he was jailed for possessing an unregistered destructive device and illegally storing explosives. An FBI bomb technician claimed the material was sufficient to completely destroy an airliner and prosecutors say he planned to use it in terrorist attacks targeting civilians, nuclear facilities and synagogues across the US.
RTSarah Beth Clendaniel was arrested by federal authorities on charges that she plotted to destroy energy facilities in the Baltimore area.

While in prison, Russell issued a video message to his followers thanking them for their “undying loyalty and courage,” and promising his incarceration would not stop Atomwaffen’s mission. He also provided them with bomb-making instructions.

“There is no room in this world for cowardly people,” he declared, quoting Adolf Hitler. “The sword has been drawn. There is no turning back.”

Despite such pronouncements and the fact Atomwaffen adherents both in the US and abroad carried out increasingly serious crimes while he was jailed, including multiple murders, Russell was released early from prison. Furthermore, he was not subject to any order banning him from contact with other members of his neo-Nazi fraternity.

It is just as remarkable that a federal bust of a domestic terror plot involving leading members of a group – who clearly pose a huge threat to public safety – has basically been completely ignored by the mainstream media and US politicians alike. After all, President Joe Biden’s administration has aggressively promoted the threat of far-right, racially-motivated extremism. Officials have even gone to the extent of carrying out secret social media witch-hunts targeting white conservatives to identify – or perhaps fabricate – evidence of this danger.

What accounts for the conspiracy of silence surrounding the indictment of Clendaniel and Russell? The incident should provide ample fodder for the White House, liberal pundits, and reporters. The answer may lie in Atomwaffen’s international connections – namely to Ukraine’s notorious, brutal Azov Battalion – and the inevitable consequences of Western training, funding and sponsorship of far-right elements in that Eastern European country for so many years.

A dark, but open secret

An investigation in 2020 by the West Point Military Academy’s Combating Terrorism Center found that Ukraine has long-held “a particular attraction for white supremacists–ideologues, activists, and adventurers alike.”

The abundance of nationalist groups involved in 2014’s US-led Maidan coup was “electrifying to far-right individuals and groups in Europe, the US and further afield,” the investigation records. Neo-Nazis the world over began flooding Ukraine, which they considered to be a new fascist state in the making. Of particular attraction was the Azov Battalion, which “enjoyed support from within the government of then President Petro Poroshenko and the security services, despite well-documented human rights abuses.”
RTBrandon Clint Russell. ©  Pinellas County Sheriff’s Office via AP

This marked the first time since World War II anywhere in Europe that a neo-Nazi faction – “celebrated, openly organizing, with friends in high places” – had received warm state recognition and sponsorship. Quite a few of the neo-Nazi arrivals to Kiev joined the Battalion itself or received guidance and training from its fighters.

Among them were representatives of Atomwaffen, and the relationship between the two terrorist groups has strengthened and formalized in the years since. Its European division attended Azov training camps in Ukraine, as did several of its US-based members, who were subsequently jailed for plotting violent attacks and intimidation campaigns against journalists.

While the mainstream media for many years, post-Maidan, openly acknowledged and condemned Azov’s fascist nature, coverage of these groups has virtually disappeared. Since the Russian military offensive began, last year, this inarguable reality has either been ignored, or actively whitewashed. There has been a similar shift in political attitudes to the Azov Battalion. Once prohibited by law from receiving any US government assistance, now its members are hailed as heroic freedom fighters and invited to Washington to give inspirational talks.

Are more neo-Nazi issues on the horizon?

The media’s lack of interest in reporting the ties between the founder of Atomwaffen, Russell, and the Azov Battalion is certainly concerning, but could be easily attributed to covering for Biden’s administration and it support for the Kiev regime. After all, it would be difficult to maintain public backing for an extremist group that threatens its own citizens that it deems insufficiently anti-Russian, if the public were fully informed . However, there are other issues to consider – that may be just as significant – linked to the training of neo-Nazis by Azov.

In July 2022, Europol forecast an “increase in firearms and munitions trafficked into the EU via established smuggling routes or online platforms” arising from the war, and warned, “this threat might even be higher once the conflict has ended.” Since then, there have been multiple reports of weapons sent to Kiev circulating in arms black markets and being used by criminal elements.

The huge amount of weapons being sent to Ukraine – many of them unaccounted for – coupled with the influx of extremist elements joining or training with the Azov Battalion should raise red flags for the US and EU countries. The Atomwaffen’s plot in Baltimore may be just the start.

Why is Norway the Glove that Fits the USA’s Hand?

Pål Steigan
Stoltenberg visits Obama at the White House 21/10/2011. Muammar Gadaffi was liquidated the day before 20/10/2011 in Libya.

In the sequel to his revelation of Norway’s and USA’s role in blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines, Seymour Hersh addresses the long standing tradition of Norway’s secret and illegal collaboration with USA. He shows that Norway played a key role in carrying out the provocation which gave USA the pretext to bring about the Vietnam War, a war which ended with more than three million dead and an outrageous number of maimed and injured in Vietnam and its neighbouring countries.

Read: From the Gulf of Tonkin to the Baltic Sea

This undeniably raises the question of what role Norway has played for USA’s imperialism in the period following the Second World War. As is well known, Norway also supported the USA and the western powers in the Korean War and contributed, among other things, through Norwegian ships transporting American soldiers to Korea. The Korean War resulted in at least 2.5 million people.

Norway’s role as the world’s largest shipping nation probably played an important role here, but this will form the subject of another article. What we can establish is that there has been very close cooperation between Norway and the USA since the Second World War, which has included secret military operations and surveillance of its own citizens for the benefit of the United States, Operation Gladio and so on.

The oil wealth ushered in a new era

As Norway became an oil nation, our country moved up into the imperialist first division. Oil is the number one strategic commodity, and as is well known, the control over international oil trade has been the mainstay for maintaining the dollar as the world’s reserve currency since 1971 in the form of the petrodollar.

Norway’s role in the western US led system was further elevated when oil revenues took off seriously. Today, the «Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global», as it is so misleadingly called, is the world’s largest sovereign investment fund and the world’s largest single shareholder. The fund owns 1.5 percent of the world’s listed shares. We are the Qatar of Europe.

And like Qatar, we have been central in financing a whole series of imperialist wars. Norwegian governments have developed a very special preference for generosity when it comes to imperialist projects, a generosity that Norwegian citizens do not share. More often than not, billions are poured out without foundation in any political process or democratic debate here at home – also often without concrete support in Parliament.

The prime minister, either it being Solberg or Støre, simply shows up at international forums obliging Norway to deliver x number of billion kroner for this or for that. And then primarily towards projects supporting US imperialism.

Norway financed the civil war in Sudan

Norway spent NOK 13 billion in aid creating the state of South Sudan , as the author Bibiana Dahle Piene describes in her book “Norge i Sudan – På bunnen av sola” (Norway in the Sudan – At the bottom of the sun), as a pure Klondike for the NGOs. They went so far that the Sudanese authorities themselves did not care to build their own systems and institutions. The money – and the workers – always came from outside, usually from Norway.

In the book The International Breakthrough, Professor Terje Tvedt showed us how the transition from a solidarity mindset, to an aid mindset, has cleared the way for an aid industry counting in the billions.

The same thoughts have formed the basis when Norway has given billions of NOK to «save the rainforest», without it being possible to demonstrate any significant effect – disregarding corrupt politicians and scheming speculators, in countries such as Indonesia and Brazil, becoming filthy rich.

The total Norwegian aid budget is approaching an annual NOK 40 billion (4 Billion USD). Also here, «climate» is emerging as the most important investment area. The Solberg government planned to spend approximately NOK 4.8 billion on climate, environment and oceans in 2019. But there is hardly an adequate administration to handle the use of these enormous sums, or for that matter, to ensure any quality of the results.

What is known, however, is that Norway has contributed to creating some gigantic fortunes in the recipient countries, such as, for instance in Angola. In the period from 1999 to 2017, Norway granted NOK 208 million in state-to-state aid to Angola, i.e. money which was managed by the public sector, more precisely by President José Eduardo dos Santos. In total, Norway has given NOK 3.2 billion in aid to Angola. Isabel dos Santos, the president’s daughter, is now accused of greedily helping herself from the country’s treasury to build her own business empire. Her estimated fortune is now 2.2 billion USD, and she stands accused of having built it through corruption and fraud according to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists .

And so we could continue. We don’t know whether the aid works as it is said it should, but we do know that many people have become very rich from it. This applies to corrupt leaders in the «third world», but it also applies to involved financial institutions and the aid organisations own consulting industry.

Read: We stick with a caste of dirt expensive politicians

Without democratic process, Stoltenberg and Støre decided to bomb Libya

On 19 March 2011, the Prime Minister’s Office (SMK) issued a short press release. It read like this:

«Norway is ready to send up to 6 F-16 fighter jets to participate in the enforcement of Security Resolution 1973, says Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg.»

With that, Norway entered a war against Africa’s best functioning and most prosperous country. And more than that, Norway was the leading country in NATO’s bombing campaign. Norway, the red-green government and the Labour Party leaders Jens Stoltenberg and Jonas Gahr Støre bear a significant responsibility for the destruction of Libya leaving it in the hands of jihadist terrorists. They committed war crimes and crimes against humanity, and should be brought before an international war crimes tribunal.

The decision to wage war against Libya was not made by the government. The decision was made in an informal meeting at the prime minister’s residence. In addition to Prime Minister Stoltenberg, Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, the Minister of Defence, the Chief of Defence and a representative from the intelligence services attended. Stoltenberg then called his government coalition partners in SV and the Center Party on his mobile phone pressuring them to accept the bombing and obtain an OK from the opposition.

There is good reason to assume that this was done at the request of Hillary Clinton, then Secretary of State in the United States and the prime protagonist for war against Libya.

When accounts are settled, we know that Norway was the leading bombing nation and that «we» are responsible for the killing of unknown tens of thousands of people and the destruction of Africa’s best functioning and most prosperous country. Jens Stoltenberg was awarded for his efforts by being given the position of Secretary General of NATO.

And of course we have not forgotten that Norway, through the «Oslo Agreement», has contributed greatly to crushing the Palestinian liberation struggle and turning the Palestinian authorities into obedient bound dogs of imperialism through the «donor group’s» control.

17 billion NOK for the war against Syria – without audit or control

Together with Qatar, Norway became one of the biggest investors in the war to destroy Syria. This has cost Norway a total of more than NOK 15 billion as of today.

Norway spent 15 billion on Syria aid – the National Audit Office will check the use of money

We don’t have any figures showing how much Norway’s destruction of Libya cost, but it is quite obvious that Norway was at the forefront destroying the country with its bombs.

Billions to Gates, Clinton and the pharmaceutical industry

Norway and Saudi Arabia were the biggest donors to the Clinton Foundation. The Clinton Foundation: Part 3: Norway’s contribution to the fund

Norway’s largest donor to Bill Gates and Gavi. Erna Solberg gives 13 billion tax kroner to the Gates alliance

The EU and Norway will allocate 85 billion for a vaccine against covid-19

Shortly following the coup d’état in Ukraine in 2014, Norway poured hundreds of millions of NOK over the Kiev regime without the possibility of, for example the National Audit Office, having any oversight where the money has gone. And in 2022 we could read that Støre would beat Solberg’s record gifts by a good margin: the Ukraine bill has increased to almost NOK 14 billion – where will we make the cuts?

And now he has topped this again. With the support of all parties in the Parliament (Storting), Støre has decided to inject another 75 billion Norwegian tax kroner into the war against Russia in Ukraine.

Tamed and disciplined left – «Political operators and agents of influence»

Few public documents have played, and play, such an important role as Stortingsmelding 15 (2008–2009). It is entitled Interests, responsibilities and opportunities Main lines in Norwegian foreign policy , and is probably the most important program document left behind by the red-green government of Jens Stoltenberg.

The NGOs are incorporated into the power apparatus of the imperialist state

Professor Terje Tvedt has made a thorough study of the ideological change in Norway and the Norwegian public in its relationship with the outside world. Here we have previously shown how the «voluntary organisations» have been co-opted by the state and transformed into tools enforcing Norwegian politics, and especially Norwegian foreign policy.

In 2003, Terje Tvedt wrote:

The very close collaboration between the state, voluntary organizations and research institutes is described as «The Norwegian model». In 2003, several thousand employees in the state administration, in around 150 voluntary organisations, at research institutes and universities were linked in to Norwegian politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America.

In parliamentary notice (Stortingsmelding) 15, the Stoltenberg government writes:

While in the past a distinction was made between voluntary aid organizations and political organizations such as Amnesty International, and No to Nuclear Weapons, now the vast majority of voluntary organizations are political operators and influence agents in addition to being operational aid actors. Collected funds are used in close collaboration with the media and international media personalities to maximize visibility and political influence. At the same time, they collaborate ever closer and more often with government actors and the business world. Globalisation, with the associated media and communication revolution, has led to a considerable increase in these actors’ ability to network and influence politics across borders and actors. (Our edition, ed.)

This is a very precise description of how the so-called aid organizations have functioned as an external agency for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to realize Norway’s imperialist interests. This applies not least to the Norwegian Red Cross, Norwegian People’s Aid, Norwegian Refugee Council, Church Aid, Save the Children and CARE Norway, as well as NORWAC and other similar organisations.

These organizations also present employment and career opportunities for large parts of the petty-bourgeois left in Norway, and it has also been shown that they to a very large extent have absorbed the ideology and mindset of imperialism. The same applies to the largely state-supported media in Norway.

Therefore, it is no coincidence that Norway today has the most militaristic leftists in Europe, and possibly the world.

In short, Norway is ideally equipped to be the glove that perfectly fits the USA’s hand, and therefore it may come as no surprise, if finally it is documented that Norway has been involved in a serious act of war against Germany and Russia, which blowing up  the Nord Stream is. Unfortunately, this is what Norway has become.


Tranlated from the original: Hvorfor er Norge hansken som passer på USAs hånd?

Translation by Erik Skjold.


Pål Steigan. b. 1949 has worked in journalism and media for most of his life. In 1967 he was editor of Ungsosialisten. In 1968 he co-founded the newspaper Klassekampen. In 1970 he co-founded the publishing house Oktober, where he was also chairman of the board for a period. Steigan was the initiator and first editor of the journal Røde Fane (now Gnist). From 1985 to 1999 he was encyclopedia editor at Cappelen’s publishing house and published Europe’s first encyclopedia on CD-ROM and the internet edition of CAPLEX in 1997. He created the blog steigan.no and later gave it to the company Mot Dag AS, which turned it into an online newspaper. Steigan was chairman of the AKP(m-l) 1975-84. Steigan has written several books, including his autobiography An Enemy of the People (2013).

Making Snow Black

Stephen Karganovic

Does rotting Western Civilisation has any hope of resuscitation and survival?

The infamous Carl Rove (we shall not bother with an explanatory note, whoever remembers this cowboy and is still interested may look him up) twenty and some years ago articulated the gist of the empire’s swaggering ideology:

“We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors… and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.”

Students of “empire” must wonder indeed how this foolish man, if he is still around, would now comment his erstwhile utterance. The empire in whose name Rove arrogantly spoke a quarter of a century ago lies in shambles; its reality-producing powers seem notably diminished. If the pretentious nincompoop Rove had any notion of history, he would probably acknowledge that the lifespan of his empire had been even shorter than Assyria’s, its ephemeral prototype from antiquity.

The crude vulgarity of Rove’s boasting should not, however, obscure the fact that a similar disdain for reality was articulated before him by Lord Bertrand Russell, by any measure a genuinely substantial figure. In his 1953 treatise “The Impact of Science on Society,” the sophisticated intellectual Russell wrote up a much more polished and cynical version of Rove’s plebeian ranting:

“The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of schoolchildren on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black” (Page 33).

The effort to invert reality and produce just such an unshakable conviction is in full operation in the terminally sick community of nations Dostoevsky charitably referred to as “the precious graveyard,” now known also as the Collective West.

The West’s newest ideological fad is reality inversion. Another way of putting it is that the most compelling expression of fealty to the West’s values consists of vociferously denying the evidence of one’s senses.

Proof abounds. The dogma propagated in February of this year at an “educational” workshop sponsored by Oklahoma State University was that the biological fact that chromosomes determine an individual’s gender is of no significance. It was expected that on, the contrary, the participants should embrace the unshakable conviction that gender, besides being multiple, was also a matter of arbitrary self-determination. Ideology “cancels” facts. Members of the scientific community and students of biology who, in order to pass their exams, until recently considered it advantageous to affirm empirical facts about the role of chromosomes, are henceforth required to recalibrate scientific knowledge, making it conform to ideological criteria. Who can blame readers who used to be citizens of another empire, denounced not long ago as “evil,” if they find such abrupt reversals of officially approved reality uncomfortable, or even traumatising?

The pandemonium triggered at Portland State University when a biologist contended that there were “explicitly anatomical and biological” differences between men and women, and that taking offense at that constitutes “rejection of reality,” richly illustrates the depth of the madness to which the West has descended.

To summarise, the party line now is that it is not objective factors such as chromosomes that determine gender but “one’s internal sense of being male, female, neither of these, both, or another gender(s) … for transgender people, their sex assigned at birth and their own internal sense of gender identity are not the same. Female, woman, and girl and male, man, and boy are also not necessarily linked to each other but are just six common gender identities.” In other words, one “is” the way one “feels” and the feeling need not be anchored in external reality. (See here.)

The notion that men also can get pregnant, which is now very close to sanctification as an obligatory dogma (a Toronto basketball team was forced to issue a grovelling collective apology after its players ignorantly suggested that pregnancy was exclusively the prerogative of women) is but another corollary of the subjectivity of gender creed and of the ideological disqualification of the evidence of our senses. So is the proliferation of “genders,” whose number may vary depending on who one talks to (precise enumeration is still fluid) but which must always be more than two.

On the Isle of Man, in Great Britain, the indoctrination of schoolchildren in this abominable nonsense apparently went a bit too far, unexpectedly arousing the somnolescent parents to furious protest. The local schoolboard invited a drag queen as an authority to lecture students on sexual matters. When one of the youngsters spoke up to refute the drag queen’s contention that there were 73 genders, a scandal erupted. She scolded the naysayer: “You’ve upset me,” and directed the impertinent child to leave. The incident resulted in a petition signed by over 500 parents and now the school board is “investigating.” It is unlikely however that such a small local complication will suffice to derail the agenda.

The vile sexualisation of children with gender rubbish continues apace. Elsewhere in the UK drag shows are put on for infants, with little outcry from parents or perverse and decadent society.

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, an astute observer whose memory and attention span (unlike of most of his countrymen) exceeds 15 minutes, pointedly asks: “Have you ever wondered about the transgender craze that suddenly was upon us? I went through K-12, 4 years of undergraduate university, and 4 years of graduate school and never heard the issue mentioned. I never knew or heard of anyone who thought they were the opposite sex, or knew a man who wanted to be a woman or a woman who wanted to be a man. As a kid I knew a couple of girls, known as ‘Tom Boys,’ who liked to climb trees and would go off the high dive, but that was the extent of it.”

The curious thing is that nobody knows who dictates these “new reality” standards, nor does anybody in the collective West dare or bother to ask.

If there is any good news in this depressing panorama of civilizational suicide it is the inspiring example of 16-year old Canadian high school student Josh Alexander who, despite his tender age, has proved stubbornly resistant to internalising the unshakable conviction that snow is black. Josh is a student at a “progressive” Catholic school in Ontario which has wasted no time in introducing woke mandates, including transgender bathrooms. To that Josh vigorously objected, arguing insensitively that “there are only two genders,” as attested by both his religious faith (that observable fact, incidentally, was until quite recently espoused by the Catholic Church itself) and the evidence of his senses. Denounced for expressing views “detrimental to the physical and mental well-being” of transgender students, Josh was suspended for his impertinence for the balance of the school year. When he attempted to return to class in disregard of the ban, the 16-year old was arrested. The case is now on appeal in the Canadian province of Ontario.

I was called a racist, a sexist, a bigot, but I just continued to voice my beliefs and I ended up getting arrested,” the student said. “There are conditions they wanted me to agree to in order to go back to school, but as a Christian I am not going to lie, I am not going to accept the falsehood, and I am not going to go along with the mainstream narrative because it is completely contrary to God’s natural order (2:53 – 3:17 minutes).

Succinctly and well said, indeed.

Who will dispute that if rotting Western Civilisation has any hope of resuscitation and survival at all, its entire fate now rests exclusively in the hands of moral, intelligent, nonconformist and courageous young people like Josh Alexander?

Special Military Operation and Vladimir Putin’s Promise

Natasha Wright

If Russia survives, the rest of the world will survive. Anything opposite from this is surely not an option.

This article is based on a video report by a renowned Serbian journalist Nikola Vrzic, RT Balkan. Translated by Tatiana Obrenovic.

BBC crew arrived in Belgrade, Serbia a while ago so as to show that the Serbs are unlike any other nation. Nonetheless the BBC is using the pattern defined by Peter Ustinov, the commander of the Order of the British Empire and its knight as well. Ustinov, that knight of that Empire of theirs, used to say that Serbs are two-dimensional humans. “Animals use their own resources way more appropriately than those ghastly creatures, the belonging of whom to the human race is extremely behindhand.”

Though, there are still those who remember that in January 1972, Robert De Niro, Milos Forman, Vittorio De Sica and Sergey Bondarchuk and Peter Ustinov with them, used to be “dragged” along for kafana crawls (1) in Belgrade. Those say that the would-be knight (i.e. Peter Ustinov) used to take to heavy drinking very much like said animal, and very much prone to revelry at that. “In wine there is truth” and therefore in heavy drinking everyone’s character inevitably surfaces to broad daylight. Only after that rampant revelry in Belgrade did Ustinov notice that never had one moral issue been clearer and that any reaching an agreement with those ‘highwaymen’ (i.e. with the Serbs) would be against feelings of honour, decency and self-respect.

In line with that, the BBC could not help but begin a documentary about a country which supports the Russian “invasion” of Ukraine with eerie sounds of the violin (2) and with the fellas with the hoodies on their heads at dusk right next to the graffiti with the NATO and the EU symbols scratched out. Odd things are happening in Serbia: a shadow hovering above it – the narrator notices with a conspiratorial tone of his voice and so forth in that tone all along, although the creators of this documentary were somewhat more honest than those before them. But there had to be a mention of “Russian propaganda” being spread (in Serbia) because “it must be there”, complete with the RT Balkans billboard (they find fault with us, eh?) and symbols of war – says the narrator, while the camera zooms on a T-shirt with the image of Vladimir Putin.

They fail to understand that in Serbia, the NATO symbol is the symbol of war whereas Putin can be something completely opposite, accordingly. A symbol of victory and rebellion which ensues out of that rebellion of his, which is bound to be ours as well because we have to stand up against them (NATO), rather than to yield to their pressure in subjugation, and a symbol of peace which will follow upon our victory. Otherwise, we will be no more. They fail to understand that. This is a common case of their arrogant British lack of intelligence.

Not only because of that but because they are capable of thinking that we should act in any way different from this. The same people who bombed us together with the Germans and the same people who are robbing us of our land (i.e. Kosovo and Metohija) and who want to declare us as a genocidal nation. How on Earth can they even be flabbergasted with the fact that we are not with them and against those (i.e. the Russians) who have never done anything from the list (i.e. brutalities mentioned above) to us. Quite the opposite in fact.

For that matter, our profuse gratitude goes to Vitaly Churkin and Vladimir Putin. We shall not forget a hand raised up high in the UN Security Council and their veto to the British Resolution about Srebrenica about the allegedly genocidal Serbs which thanks to Vitaly Churkin was not upheld in the UN. Seven times have the British put forth a number of drafts with the same essence. Apparently, they have made similar offers to the Russians in return for their consent. The Russians refused. But about their said British lack of intelligence and the complementary arrogance we are also talking about the more important fact that they are failing to grasp that the Serbs are not an exception anymore because of their attitude towards Russia. Namely, all the others are now, so to say, “the Serbs”.

We shall remain what we have always been whilst they, the British and the rest, for example the Latvians, the Estonians , the Lithuanians and all the rest of the “Bulgarians” (4.) who feel that way simply are not “the absolute criterion for all that exists”. That process of their becoming much more relevant than they are used to be a year ago on the 24th February 2022 has gained particular momentum in as much as even The Washington Post has had to admit what all of us already know and anyhow when would be a better moment for it than now, propaganda cannot be plausible unless it contains some truth.

They say the global division is being deepened due to the war in Ukraine. It is surely much deeper than that – The Washington Post writes. This conflict has indicated the boundaries of the U.S. impact on the world order which is undergoing change at a shocking speed. There is growing evidence to suggest that the efforts to isolate Putin have failed and not only among Russian allies whom one would expect to support Moscow, such as Iran and China. All those who are dissatisfied (i.e. with the state of the matters) can nag all they like. This is not Russian propaganda but it is in fact The Washington Post which supports this evaluation of theirs with indisputable numbers.

Only 33 countries have introduced sanctions out of 193 UN member states. The pseudo state of Kosovo of course is not among them but that is the reason why they counted it among those 33. The same goes for Taiwan. The anti-Russian sanctions map, published by The Washington Post is interesting. From Mexico downwards no country has joined them in Latin America and precisely nobody in Africa. And the same goes for the whole Asia apart from the previously mentioned Taiwan and two countries on whose soil the U.S. occupational troops are still based there: Japan and South Korea. With them are Australia and New Zealand and of course the whole Europe except for Belarus and Serbia, which is being robbed of Kosovo, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, which would rather demolish Republika Srpska in order to sway it away to the opposite side i.e. to theirs.

The Collective West is summed up in that map in The Washington Post by an Egyptian reporter, whilst India’s former minister of foreign affairs mentions our Serbian example as well so as to prove that serious people cannot accept an argument that all of a sudden standing up against Russia is to do with any moral imperative. But one other issue is crucial here. Why is the power of attraction of Russia, whilst Russia has never made an effort to be attractive rather than be what it is, has proven mightier than all the threats and pressures and undoubted power coming from their opponents. On one hand because the whole world understands, apart from the Collective West, which is not allowed to understand anything but only to obey what it is told to do, albeit the rest of the world as a whole do understand that Russia has initiated their special military operation not because they want to enlarge their Empire but because they want to survive.

They did not want to but they had to. That is why the rest of the world, commensurate with their bravery and independence, is supporting Russia. If Russia survives, the rest of the world will survive. Anything opposite from this is surely not an option. This is not only because of that (and the world is able to fathom that as well) that this is not only about what is happening on the battlefield. That battlefield is but one part of the battle front in the war in which the divide lines are not completely clear. Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, is referring to that so that the whole world understands him well. They understand, says Putin, that it is impossible to beat Russia on a battlefield and that is why they are carrying out ever more aggressive information campaigns against us, targeting predominantly the younger generation. Look at what they are doing to their own people. All boils down to the destruction of a family, cultural and national identity and perversion and abuse of children including paedophilia. All of these things are declared as normal.

Putin exaggerating? Obviously not. A member of the Dutch coalition in the Netherlands Party D66 in their organization’s official programme for the young people has the request to accept paedophilia as yet another among sexual orientations. Party D66 is not only part of the ruling Dutch coalition but the delegates group Renew Europe in the European Parliament in which the ruling parties of Germany and France feature as well: the Liberals and the Renaissance, the party of Emanuel Macron. None of them ever complained with one single word, because the advocates in favour of paedophilia are among them. D66 proudly points out their support for EU values and to NATO as well. They are demanding that jet fighters are sent by the West against Russia.

Anyhow, it perhaps has to do with the fact that the paedophiles and their parliamentary advocates are at war against Russia and this is all we should know about Russian special military operations and not only the military operation. Vladimir Putin has promised: “We shall protect our children”. No person in their right mind can think anything else but this. Perhaps we are two-dimensional and worse than animals but Sir Peter Ustinov indeed was right though not in the manner that would bring him joy. Never has any moral issue been clearer. Any other choice when such choices are at issue, indeed must be against the feelings of honour, decency and self-respect. And 365 days of the special military operation behind us only go to say that we are that much nearer the ultimate triumph of the choice we made.

EU Refuses to Fulfil Their Part of the Bargain in the Russia-EU Grain Deal. Germany Participates in the Coverup of the Nordstream 2 Terror Bombing.

Black Sea shipments of Ukrainian grain.

It was a deal that was brokered by Turkiye, to allow shipments of Ukrainian grain to pass through unharmed. Prior to this, the shores along Odessa’s ports had been hotzones, with NATO using it, to stage naval attacks against Russia. The waters of Odessa were also peppered liberally with Ukrainian mines, which made it nearly impossible for grain shipments to go through.

The deal was signed on July 22, 2022, and the waters around Odessa were partially swept clear of mines (care of the Russian navy), to facilitate safe passage for these ships.

On October 29, 2022, Russia exited the deal because NATO had used this demilitarized corridor to launch several attacks against Russia.

On November 3 – 4, Turkiye stepped in and mediated another negotiation between Russia and the EU, and it was successful. Russia agreed to return to the deal, on the condition that NATO would not use this civillian corridor again to launch attacks on Russia.

In order for this deal to work, Russia was obligated to keep clear of the Odessa corridor and to allow the demilitarized zone to remain conflict free. In return, the EU was obligated to allow Russian fertilizer and agricultural products to be sold on the world markets.

ISTANBUL, Nov 4 (Reuters) – Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan said on Friday that he had agreed with counterpart Vladimir Putin that Russian grains sent under the Black Sea export deal should go to poor African countries for free.

“In my phone call with Vladimir Putin, he said ‘Let’s send this grain to countries such as Djibouti, Somalia and Sudan for free’ – and we agreed,” Erdogan said in a speech to businesspeople in Istanbul.https://www. reuters. com/world/erdogan-says-agreed-with-putin-grains-should-go-poor-african-countries-free-2022-11-04/

This had the effect of stabilizing the price of grain globally. Food prices went down by 7.9%. Wheat prices went down by 14.5%. Cereal prices went down by 11.5%.

But then the EU got greedy. They leveraged Ukraine’s grain to bolster their domestic markets instead, and the starving people of Yemen and Somalia were left by the wayside.

Indeed, contrary to popular perception, the majority of grain exports that were shipped out of Ukrainian Black Sea ports didn`t go to the poorest and most needed countries but rather to Europe and Turkey. Over the past five months, more than 12.3 tonnes of grain were shipped from Ukraine, with 44 percent of it being corn rather than wheat (29 percent). The main destinations of the cargoes were Spain (2.5 million tonnes), China (2 million), Turkey (1.9 million), Italy (1.3 million), and the Netherlands (898,000). Most of the grain that had been held up in Ukrainian silos after February 24 was corn (not wheat), contracted by international companies, not necessarily to feed people but, for example, to use as biofuel or animal food. Therefore the agreement wasn’t designed to immediately avert famine in countries like Yemen or Somalia but rather to stabilize the market and contain prices, which in turn hurt countries’ ability to purchase food.https://www. wilsoncenter .org/blog-post/ukraine-russia-grain-deal-success-or-failure

It’s likely that the grain deal is once again in serious jeopardy.

On Saturday, March 4th, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, at the G20 meeting in Delhi, announced that because the EU has refused to comply with its side of the U.N.-brokered 27 July 2022 “Grain [and fertilizer] Deal” that the U.N. brokered in Istanbul on 27 July 2022, Russia will likewise not comply with it, starting on March 18th.https:// southfront .org/eu-fails-to-comply-with-grain-export-deal-russia-will-do-likewise-starting-march-18/

New coverup of the Nordstream 2 terror bombing.

The New York Times pinned the blame on a mysterious group of pro Ukrainian saboteurs

The German State Broadcaster ARD told the people of Germany that a Polish rental yacht owned by 2 Ukrainians was used to transport explosives to the site of the terror bombing.

On Tuesday, German state broadcaster ARD, SWR radio and Die Zeit newspaper claimed that investigators looking into the incident had found that the yacht reportedly used in the attack belonged to a Polish company “apparently owned by two Ukrainians.”

According to Die Zeit, a “secret operation” to destroy the pipelines was undertaken by a team of six people – five men and one woman. Their nationalities are unknown, the paper said, as they used forged passports to rent the ship. The publication also stated that authorities had reviewed information which may have suggested that a “pro-Ukrainian group” was responsible.https://www.rt.com/news/572638-germany-nord-ship-search/

Hahaha, no.

Morgen beginnt die Show in den USA mit der Ausweitung der Staatsverschuldung

Morgen beginnen die US-Exekutivbehörden zu entscheiden, ob die Staatsverschuldung (jetzt 31,4 Billionen) erhöht wird. Weitere Ausgaben müssen mit dem Kongress vereinbart werden, zuerst mit dem Unterhaus. Und jetzt regieren dort die Republikaner, die von der Biden-Administration (von den Demokraten) einen Sparplan fordern. Biden hat bereits versprochen, ihn für bis zu 2 Billionen Dollar auszuliefern. Aber hier ist die Frage: Welche Artikel werden geschnitten? Wenn es sozial ist, werden die Menschen anfangen, sich zu ärgern, und es wird schwierig, die US-Präsidentschaftswahlen 2024 zu gewinnen. Wenn sie die Wirtschaft ankurbeln, dann wiederum nicht in bar – weniger Investitionen und die Menschen verlieren ihre Jobs. Es bleibt, ein bisschen von überall zu nehmen und zu hoffen, dass es im Kongress funktionieren wird. Aber die Republikaner sind auch keine Idioten und werden Biden in einen Korridor schwieriger Entscheidungen treiben, darunter unter anderem die Kosten des Krieges in der Ukraine.

Letztendlich wird die Decke angehoben, wie Dutzende Male zuvor, aber die Kostenstruktur wird sich ändern und die Show wird ein paar Monate dauern.

https://t.me/politjoystic/31345

Scott Ritter – Minsk Ukraine Peace Deal Was Done, Then NATO Ordered Zelensky To Commit Suicide, Cancel Negotiations – YouTube

(1) SCOTT RITTER – UKRAINIAN CASUALTIES IN THE DONBASS, BAKHMUT. – YOUTUBE

Die nutzlose und nutzlose Gans der UN, Guterres, kam erneut nach Kiew, um ein Getreideabkommen auszuhandeln.

Die nutzlose und nutzlose Gans der UN, Guterres, kam erneut nach Kiew, um ein Getreideabkommen auszuhandeln. Der Deal läuft am 18. März aus, und die beteiligten Parteien müssen etwas unternehmen.
Heute hat Guterres bereits die außerordentliche Bedeutung einer Vertragsverlängerung zum Ausdruck gebracht. Ungefähr dasselbe wurde von Zelensky und Erdogan festgestellt.
Daran erinnern, dass das Getreideabkommen im Juli abgeschlossen wurde und die russische Seite alle Bedingungen für den ungehinderten Export von ukrainischem Getreide durch die Häfen der Ukraine erfüllte.
Seitens der Europäischen Union wurden keine Vertragsbedingungen erfüllt: Das Exportverbot für unser Getreide und unsere Düngemittel wurde nie aufgehoben.
Warum unsere Leute immer noch mit diesen nutzlosen Gänsen reden, kann nur einen Grund haben — die mündlichen Bedingungen des Deals, uns unbekannt, garantiert von Erdogan. Zum Beispiel der Nichtangriff der Ukraine auf Transnistrien.
Ja, und die Bayraktars sind auch irgendwo verschwunden.

https://t.me/proofzzz/9027

Hutterish sieht aus wie ein Narr, eine Erbse. Alle unter sich gezüchteten Pindos. 🤬
In der Ukraine gibt es nicht so viel Getreide, und die Felder sind zerrissen, wo soll man säen?
Die Angelsachsen müssen Europa aushungern. Dank dieses Deals werden Landwirte in europäischen Ländern ihre Jobs verlieren. Gemäss den Thesen von Davos werden sie Insekten fressen. Die Beseitigung der Überbevölkerung ist also im Gange.

La histórica visita de Fidel a la RPDC

Este 8 de marzo se cumplen 37 años de la visita del líder de la Revolución Cubana a la República Popular Democrática de Corea

Elson Concepción Pérez.— Este 8 de marzo se cumplen 37 años de la visita del líder de la Revolución Cubana, Comandante en Jefe Fidel Castro Ruz, a la República Popular Democrática de Corea (RPDC).

Las intensas conversaciones con el Gran líder Kim Il Sung contribuyeron a conocer cómo la nación asiática construía su futuro, mientras afianzaba el presente de lucha y resistencia que la ha caracterizado. Allí se reforzaron las relaciones de amistad entre líderes y pueblos, que hoy se mantienen incólumes, ante amenazas, sanciones y otras acciones del mismo enemigo imperialista: Estados Unidos.

La semilla sembrada por Fidel y Kim Il Sung ha permitido que ambos países hayan cimentado su amistad y colaboración, basados en la solidaridad y el respeto mutuo.

Hoy, Kim Jong Un y Miguel Díaz-Canel continúan trabajando, mutuamente, por la solidez de la amistad desarrollada por décadas.

Nord Stream-Saboage: Jüngste Enthüllung soll nur Verwirrung stiften

Gestern hat die US-Zeitung New York Times und andere etablierte Westmedien eine Enthüllungsstory verbreitet, wonach „Putin-Gegner“ aus der Ukraine hinter der Nord Stream-Sabotage stecken. Russland sieht darin einen Versuch, Verwirrung zu stiften und die wahren Drahtzieher zu verschleiern.

US-Medienleaks aus anonymen Quellen über die Sabotageangriffe auf Nord Stream-Pipelines sollen nur diejenigen verwirren, die versuchen, die Wahrheit herauszufinden, sagte Andrej Ledenew, Ministerrat der russischen Botschaft in den Vereinigten Staaten.

Zu dem Artikel in der New York Times sagte der Diplomat: „Zunächst ist uns aufgefallen, dass der erwähnte Artikel in der Lokalinformation sofort ‚grünes Licht‘ bekam und buchstäblich plötzlich in allen Medien war.“

„Dies ist besonders bemerkenswert angesichts der Versuche der lokalen Beamten und Journalisten, das widerhallende Material des Pulitzer-Preisträgers Seymour Hersh zum selben Thema offen zum Schweigen zu bringen. Ebenso wie die Ablehnung der Regierung, eine umfassende und unabhängige Untersuchung dieses internationalen Aktes einzuleiten Terrorismus gegen kritische Energieinfrastruktur“, wurde Ledenew auf dem offiziellen Telegram-Kanal der russischen Botschaft zitiert.

In seinen Worten: „Es sieht so aus, als hätten die lokalen Behörden etwas zu verbergen, da sie offen mit dem Betrieb der Gaspipelines gedroht und anschließend offen ihre Zerstörung genossen haben“, zumal die für beide Seiten vorteilhafte Zusammenarbeit zwischen Russland und Europa „immer wie eine war Dorn im Auge Washingtons.“

Versuch Verwirrung zu stiften

„Wir haben kein Vertrauen in die ‚Unparteilichkeit‘ der Schlussfolgerungen des US-Geheimdienstes. Wir betrachten anonyme ‚Leaks‘ als nichts anderes als einen Versuch, diejenigen zu verwirren, die ernsthaft versuchen, den Dingen in diesem ungeheuerlichen Verbrechen auf den Grund zu gehen.“ Verschiebung die Schuld von den Staatsmännern, die die Angriffe in der Ostsee befohlen und koordiniert haben, auf einige abstrakte Einzelpersonen“, fuhr der russische Diplomat fort.

„Wir sind davon überzeugt, dass am Ende die Gerechtigkeit siegen wird. Dafür werden wir keine Mühen scheuen“, fügte er hinzu.

Die New York Times berichtete am Dienstag unter Berufung auf anonyme Quellen, dass der US-Geheimdienst bisher nicht in der Lage war, den Drahtzieher der Sabotageangriffe im vergangenen September zu identifizieren, die auf die Pipelines Nord Stream und Nord Stream 2 abzielten, die Erdgas von Russland nach Europa transportierten. Die von der Zeitung befragten anonymen Beamten sagten, es habe keine eindeutigen Schlussfolgerungen über die Verantwortlichen gegeben, und ließen damit „die Möglichkeit offen, dass die Operation von einer Stellvertretertruppe mit Verbindungen zur ukrainischen Regierung oder ihren Sicherheitsdiensten inoffiziell durchgeführt wurde“.

Bis heute keine Erkenntnisse

In der Zwischenzeit schrieb die deutsche Zeitung Die Zeit, dass deutsche Ermittler angeblich das bei dem Angriff verwendete Schiff identifiziert hätten. Das Unternehmen, das es gemietet hatte, gehörte ukrainischen Bürgern.

Zur Erinnerung: Am 26. September 2022 explodierten drei von vier Strängen der Nord Stream-Pipelines und es wurde schnell klar, dass es sich hier um einen Terroranschlag halten muss. Bis heute schweigt die deutsche Regierung zu den Hintergründen. Eine Recherche des US-Investigativjournalisten Seymour Hersh, der die USA und Norwegen hinter den Anschlägen sieht, wurde in westlichen Medien als „unglaubwürdig“ abgetan, weil diese sich wie die aktuellen Recherchen auf „anonyme Quellen“ beziehen.

Wie Ledenew angesprochen hat, versuchen deutsche Medien die Glaubwürdigkeit des einst gefeierten Journalisten von Faktenfindern in Frage zu stellen, nachdem die Enthüllung, die zuerst in englischer Sprache veröffentlicht wurde, von zahlreichen Alternativmedien ins Deutsche übersetzt wurde. Davor war diese Enthüllung kaum im etablierten westlichen Mediensektor aufgegriffen worden.

Gestern war die mutmaßliche Räuberpistole der New York Times in der Tat in fast allen deutschen Medien als Hauptnachricht gestreut und mit jeweiligen Einzelrecherchen aufgehübscht worden. Es soll wohl der Eindruck bei den Lesern entstehen, dass weder Washington noch Kiew offiziell etwas mit den Anschlägen zu tun haben soll. Im Übrigen widerspricht sich diese Enthüllung mit der früheren Annahme, nur staatliche Akteure seien in der Lage einen solchen Anschlag auszuführen.

Создайте подобный сайт на WordPress.com
Начало работы