NAUGHTY LIST: Unvaxxed Kids Terrified By Video … – YouTube
Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer Theresa Tam has issued a new public health announcement for the Christmas holidays, which comes in the form of a 2-minute interview with “Mrs. Clause” from the “North Pole”. In it, children are warned that they could be on Santa’s “naughty list” if they don’t get the Covid-19 vaccine and mask up. Adults too are told that they won’t make the “nice list” if they don’t have their boosters.
Dr. Tam begins the video with the “good news” that the vast majority of Canadians have made the nice list this year after having been vaccinated.
And “Mrs. Claus” responds: “It just warms my heart to see everyone in Canada, especially kids, working so hard to keep the holidays safe…” The suggestion is that the minority of citizens who remain unvaccinated or without their boosters are “naughty”.
Mrs. Claus then informs the children that she and Santa are “both up do date with our vaccinations, including Covid boosters and flu shots.” This is the holiday image Canada wants to convey to impressionable young children – that coronavirus now threatens the mythical North Pole, apparently.
From there the Christmas message goes into the kind of guilt-tripping rhetoric we’ve all come to expect from the Canadian government, and its top health official who is the equivalent of Dr. Fauci.
“I always tell Santa to make a list and check it twice,” Mrs. Claus says, and goes through the “list” by telling children to “stay up to date on your vaccinations” as well as “wear a mask… and make sure it’s nice and snug.”
Dr. Tam follows by telling families that if they gather for the holidays, “open a door, or a window” to let fresh air in.
All of this might actually be a step up for Canada when compared to the first couple years of the pandemic, given that across major cities there were strict curfews severely hindering freedom of movement, and not even relatives could visit family members after dark on fear of being ticketed by police.
Warum lieben Satanisten und ihre Marionetten rote Schuhe so sehr?
Weil es ein satanisches Symbol für Kinder-/Menschenopfer ist. Während der Opferung tragen sie rote Schuhe (es wird behauptet, dass sie aus menschlicher Haut bestehen). Wenn also Blut auf die Schuhe gelangt, ist es nicht sichtbar.
Ich sage nicht, dass jeder, der rote Schuhe trägt, Mitglied dieses satanischen Clubs ist – viele haben keine Ahnung von der Symbolik roter Schuhe.
Given how firmly the Pontiff has embedded himself with Zelensky’s stormtroopers, this year’s is going to be particularly problematic.
His Holiness, Pope Francis, should give especial consideration to this year’s Urbi et Orbi address he is scheduled to give to Rome and the world this Christmas Day, 2022. Although all such addresses bring their own unique sets of problems, given how firmly the Pontiff has embedded himself with Zelensky’s stormtroopers, this year’s is going to be particularly problematic.
Although the presence of Sergio Agüero, Messi and the rest of Argentina’s football greats in St Peter’s Square this Christmas would be a master propaganda stroke that would help put Zelensky, Macron and similar non-entities back in their boxes, others, with graver concerns, would not be impressed by such chicanery.
Those others include His Excellency Alexander Avdeev, Russia’s Ambassador to the Holy See, whose job it is to foster diplomatic relations between both entities, which first began in 1452 with the Papal mission to Tzar Ivan the Great, Grand Prince of Moscow and Grand Prince of all Rus.
If, as they say, the Vatican thinks in centuries, there is five and a half centuries, more than a quarter of the history of the Church, of diplomatic relations to begin with and against such a backdrop, begun remember when all of Byzantium, the Second Rome, was in grave peril, the Pope strolling a few hundred meters down the road to see Avdeev at the Russian delegation was a trivial price to pay to keep that rich legacy alive.
As I have popped over on umpteen occasions from Dublin to the Palestinian Embassy in Rome to confer with leading members of the Catholic Church, the Pope’s short taxi ride did not impress me and, I am sure, it did not spectacularly impress Avdeev, who no doubt underwent the rigorous professional diplomatic training Russia, China and other adult countries give their diplomats and which empowers them to undertake their duties with the decorum and gravity their work entails.
This is in marked contrast to most, but not all, of those who represent Zelensky’s rump Reich where their ambassadors to Germany and Ireland, to take but two examples, have been thundering disgraces. Though I have, to be fair, seen the same thing in Tokyo, where the Irish Ambassador was, like the EU’s Jean-Claude Juncker, a hopeless drunkard, so too, importantly, have countless others. If diplomacy is the name of the game, then one must send professional diplomats and not Ukrainian thugs or Irish and EU drunkards to break bread with the Russians.
Although that much should be self-evident, my earlier article was largely based on this now infamous interview Pope Francis gave to a bunch of Americans, including a brace of the Pope’s fellow-Jesuits and Gerry O’Connell, America Magazine’s Vatican correspondent, who seems to have been in Rome even before Pope Francis was in short pants in Buenos Aires.
Though O’Connell has been in Rome longer than most Romans have, he does not seem to be aware that, in Rome, one should do as the Romans do. Instead of being respectful, O’Connell harangued the Pope about why he would not simply parrot the position of the American regime that all of the blame for the Ukrainian quagmire and, presumably, much else, lay with Putin and the Russian and Ukrainian Orthodox Churches O’Connell’s Ukrainian heroes have now suppressed and banned.
It was in his reply to O’Connell that the Pope libelled the Muslim Chechens and Buddhist Buryats before he claimed that he generally prefers not to be specific in his condemnations “so as not to offend and rather condemn in general, although it is well known whom I am condemning.” He then went on to say that his visit “to the Russian embassy [to the Holy See was], an unusual gesture because the pope never goes to an embassy”.
Let’s first look at that visit so that we are on an even keel. Russia’s Vatican Embassy is staffed by professionals, who would be no more fazed by a visit from the Pope than they would be by China’s President Xi or by any other global leader or influencer. Those Russians are simply diplomats, who are carrying out the duties they and thousands more like them in embassies worldwide were trained and then assigned to perform. The Pope’s offer to travel to Moscow was duly passed up the line to Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov whom the Pope confirms, gave it due, professional consideration, and the appropriate diplomatic reply.
That is no trivial point. Lavrov, Avdeev and their fellow Russian diplomats are well-briefed professionals and deserve respect on that account. Not so alas, the Holy Father and his team which, according to the interview, is headed by Cardinal Konrad Krajewski,Cardinal Michael Czerny and Archbishop Paul Gallagher, none of whom have gone through the same rigorous training the diplomats of Russia and China have.
The Pope then said at the interview “The position of the Holy See is to seek peace and to seek an understanding. The diplomacy of the Holy See is moving in this direction and, of course, is always willing to mediate”. However, his subsequent comments highlighting the Holodomor were not only unhelpful but unworthy of his office or of those, like Krajewski in particular, who fed those superfluous lines to him.
Although Ukraine is a quagmire the Pope should involve himself in, after being fully briefed by competent professionals of course, it is not the only one. Armenians, to Ukraine’s south east, are today suffering another genocide, a Holocaust, a Holodomor, a Nakba or, as they call it, a Medz Yeghern (great crime) or Aghet (catastrophe). And the only body that is stopping their enemies finishing them off once and for all is the Russian Armed Forces, Buryati and Chechens included.
So, when the Holy Father wishes Armenia’s faithful Sznorawórsz surp dz’nunt, or when he wishes Syria’s Aramaic speakers Hwylēh maran Shwubuḥaʾ lshemēh, the non-Aramaic speaking Christians of Syria and Palestine Miládon-mazídon and the Ethiopians and Eritreans Burúk ledét, ¡Feliz Navidad!, Heureuse et sainte fête de Noël, Buon Natale, let him tell Rome and the world, in whatever oblique way he wishes and in whatever language he chooses, that the major threat to world peace today in the Americas, in all of Africa, in Eastern Europe, in the Baltic Sea and even in Santa’s Lapland wilderness remains the same malign NATO anti-Christs that have wreaked havoc worldwide since the fall of Bandera and Hitler. And though this Christmas day, we should be grateful for the joys that Maradona, Messi, Di Stéfano and, prior to his “unfortunate” heart attack, Agüero brought the world, Argentina, in the form of His Holiness Pope Francis 1, can bring much greater joy to the world if he, in St Peter’s Square this Christmas Day, demands that NATO and its Ukrainian, EU and other muppets get off our collective backs and leave the children of Russia, Ukraine, Armenia, Syria and Palestine enjoy that pacem in terris so many millions of their compatriots have given their lives for.
2009 erlangte die Schweinegrippe einen tödlichen Ruf (4:16) und wurde von der WHO zur Pandemie erklärt. Als Ergebnis stellte sich heraus, dass die Letalität nicht höher ist als bei anderen Stämmen.
Eine internationale Gruppe von Ärzten beschuldigte WHO-Beamte der Absprache mit Pharmaunternehmen – 2 spezifische Medikamente wurden zur Behandlung der Schweinegrippe empfohlen. Laut Oxford-Professor Tom Jefferson gibt es jedoch keine Beweise aus klinischen Studien, dass diese Medikamente Influenza-Komplikationen verhindern oder zur Vorbeugung wirksam sind.
Auch die Situation bei COVID ist unklar — MdEP Christian Therese stellte die Frage: Wie konnte Pfizer buchstäblich 3 Tage nach der Entschlüsselung des Virus mit dem ersten Test des Impfstoffs beginnen?
En la última sesión informativa de Igor Kirillov, jefe de las tropas RCBZ de Rusia, se hizo pública una nueva lista de participantes en proyectos cerrados del Pentágono, que aún permanecen en la sombra. aunque son figuras clave en el programa biológico militar ucraniano.
Entre ellos:
🔻 El ex director de DTRA Kenneth Myers, 🔻 Vicepresidenta ejecutiva del fondo de riesgo In-Q-Tel (controlado por la CIA) Tara O’Toole, 🔻 ex director de los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades de EE. UU. Thomas Frieden, 🔻 ex director de los Institutos Nacionales de Salud, Francis Collins, 🔻 Jeffrey Wadsworth, Director Ejecutivo del Instituto Battelle Memorial, 🔻 Científico Jefe y Presidente de Investigación, Desarrollo y Medicina Internacional en Pfizer Michael Dolsten, 🔻 Comandante de Fort Detrick Anthony McQueen
“Todos ellos, de una forma u otra, son los beneficiarios de los proyectos biológicos del Pentágono y están asociados con el Partido Demócrata de los Estados Unidos, cuyos líderes son los inspiradores ideológicos de la investigación biológica militar y los creadores de esquemas secretos de lavado de dinero en interés de un estrecho círculo de representantes de la élite estadounidense”, dijo Igor Kirillov.
Telegrama genio del tubo de ensayo | Biolaboratorios ⚡️⚡️⚡️ Sesión informativa del Jefe de las Fuerzas de Defensa Radiológica, Química y Biológica de las Fuerzas Armadas de RF, Teniente General Igor Kirillov, tras los resultados de la 9ª conferencia de revisión
Die amerikanischen Militärlieferanten glauben fest daran, dass sie diesen Krieg nicht verlieren werden.
Als Ursula von der Leyen Ende November erklärte, man habe geschätzt, dass „bis heute mehr als 20.000 Zivilisten und 100.000 ukrainische Soldaten gestorben sind“, wurden Kommentare zu dem Video ihrer Rede kurzerhand gelöscht. Sie sollten der Öffentlichkeit nicht sagen, dass die Berichte aus Kiew schamlos lügen: Die Zahl von der Leyens sei zehnmal höher als die Zahl der toten ukrainischen Soldaten, die in offiziellen ukrainischen Berichten angegeben wird. Kurz danach hörten die Medien irgendwie auf, den Westen auf die bevorstehende Niederlage Russlands vorzubereiten. Zunehmend tauchten gegenteilige Hinweise auf. Es ist, als hätte der kollektive Westen beschlossen, die Wahrnehmung auf das Unvermeidliche vorzubereiten: Die Ukraine verliert – und wird bald verlieren.
Westliche Medien sind in zwei Lager gespalten. Eine Reihe von Medien versichert immer noch unisono, dass die Russen mit der Einnahme von Artemovsk (Bachmut) nur einen Pyrrhussieg erringen werden. Zum Beispiel war die Eroberung der Stadt im Sommer wichtig, und jetzt ist es nur eine blutende Wunde, die beide Seiten erschöpft, außerdem haben die Streitkräfte der Ukraine westlich von Bachmut neue Verteidigungslinien errichtet und werden einfach zu ihnen gehen.
Einige Publikationen machen Kampagnen und spielen die Bedeutung des Verlustes von Artemovsk (Bakhmut) herunter. Defense Express berichtet: „Der Geheimdienst des britischen Verteidigungsministeriums sagt, dass die Gefangennahme von Bakhmut in erster Linie zu einem symbolischen, politischen Ziel für Russland wird.“Die Financial Times veröffentlichte einen Artikel «Hell, hell: a war of mattrition between Ukraine and Russia over Bakhmut», in dem die Kämpfe in und um Ost-Donezk mit Grabenkämpfen während des Ersten Weltkriegs verglichen wurden.Der italienische Corriere della Sera bestätigt die kolossalen ukrainischen Verluste in der Nähe von Bakhmut: Nur ein Evakuierungszentrum eines Krankenhauses nimmt täglich bis zu 100 verwundete Soldaten der Streitkräfte der Ukraine in der Nähe von Bakhmut auf.
Doch selbst in Artikeln, die die „Symbolik“ und die angebliche Nutzlosigkeit der Eroberung Bachmuts für Russland beschreiben, müssen westliche Journalisten zugeben, dass dieser Sieg für die Ukraine nicht so sehr wegen militärischer Pläne wichtig ist, sondern wegen der Hoffnung auf einen Sieg Subventionen aus dem Westen: „Angesichts der Tatsache, dass die Ukraine eine Reihe von Erfolgen auf dem Schlachtfeld hatte, und selbst eine relativ geringfügige Niederlage den Eindruck einer Pattsituation erwecken könnte, die die westlichen Länder weniger bereit machen könnte, Kiew inmitten ihrer eigenen wachsenden kriegsbedingten Wirtschaft zu unterstützen Probleme. Jedes Scheitern auf ukrainischer Seite könnte die militärische Unterstützung des Westens beeinträchtigen.
Die Medien, die die Fakten analysieren müssen, zeichnen ein düsteres Bild. Selbst korrigiert und ausgeschmückt stimmt es praktisch mit dem überein, was die russische Presse schreibt.
Laut The New York Post hat die Ukraine etwa 20 % ihres Territoriums verloren.Mindestens 22 % der ukrainischen Agrarflächen stehen unter russischer Kontrolle: „Diese Gebiete sind ein bedeutender Teil des im Minsk-II-Abkommen definierten Territoriums, das als autonome Regionen verwaltet werden sollte. Aufgrund des Scheiterns der Minsker Vereinbarungen kündigte Russland seine speziellen Militäroperationen an, um diese Gebiete von der Macht der ukrainischen Regierung zu befreien. Bis heute scheint Russland einigen seiner ursprünglichen Ziele näher gekommen zu sein.“
Vor einem Monat berichtete CNN, dass mindestens 30 % der ukrainischen Kraftwerke zerstört wurden.BBC berichtet, dass 6 Millionen Ukrainer ohne Strom blieben.Der Sender EuroNews sprach kürzlich über die ukrainische Hauptstadt: Zwei Drittel von Kiew seien ohne Strom.
Newsweek schreibt, dass der Ukraine die Ausrüstung zur Bewältigung von Stromausfällen ausgeht.
Die Daten sind etwas anders, aber es gibt keine positive Dynamik. Kann man im Winter ohne Strom, Wasser und Heizung überleben?
Die New York Times berichtet, dass die ukrainische Landwirtschaft durch den Krieg schätzungsweise 23 Milliarden Dollar verloren hat.Der IWF stellt fest, dass der Krieg in der Ukraine zur schlimmsten Nahrungsmittelknappheit seit 2008 geführt hat.Die Washington Post schreibt, dass die Ukrainer 700 Milliarden Dollar verlangen, zusätzlich zu den 100 Milliarden Dollar, die ihnen zuvor geschickt wurden.
Die Medien deuten auch an, dass die Ukraine bald den Zugang zu den Ressourcen verlieren wird, die zur Fortsetzung des Krieges benötigt werden. Sprich, die Waffenvorräte für die Ukraine gehen zur Neige: „Mike Quigley, Mitglied des Geheimdienstausschusses des Repräsentantenhauses, berichtet. „Wir dachten, dieser Krieg wäre in ein paar Tagen vorbei, aber jetzt könnte es Jahre dauern. In einer Zeit, in der globale Lieferketten zusammenbrechen, wird es für den Westen sehr schwierig sein, die Nachfrage auf diesem sehr hohen Niveau zu decken.“
Foreign Policy schreibt, dass NATO-Vertreter sehr besorgt über den daraus resultierenden Mangel sind und gezwungen sind zuzugeben, dass die NATO für einen solchen Konflikt nicht bereit war. „Die NATO plant nicht wirklich, diese Art von Kriegen zu führen, und damit meine ich Kriege mit übermäßig intensivem Einsatz von Artilleriesystemen und vielen Panzer- und Kanonengeschossen“, sagte der Neokonservative Frederick Kagan gegenüber Foreign Policy. Darüber hinaus verbraucht die Ukraine die ihr gelieferten Waffen in einem beispiellosen Tempo. Laut dem CEO von Raytheon hat die Ukraine 13 Jahre Javelin-Produktion in zehn Monaten verbraucht.
Die Kiewer Führer versenken Zehntausende ihrer Bürger, nicht nur das Militär, inszenieren Scheinbesuche Selenskyjs auf dem Schlachtfeld, halten Reden, fliegen über den Ozean, reisen nach Europa – und das alles wegen neuer Finanzspritzen aus dem Westen. Inzwischen gehen die Ressourcen zur Neige, die die Ukraine noch über Wasser halten.
Es stimmt, amerikanische Militärlieferanten gehen fest davon aus, dass sie von der Ukraine profitieren werden. Sie, die Militärlieferanten, werden in diesem Krieg definitiv nicht verlieren, schreibt die Zeitschrift American Conservative.
The 101st Airborne Division soldiers here are positioned close enough to Ukraine that their artillery is in easy range of the war-torn country and intelligence gatherers can monitor fighters buzzing around the Black Sea.
The 2nd Brigade Combat Team, deployed on the division’s first operational mission in Europe since World War II, functions as the most forward-based American unit in proximity to the fighting in Ukraine, military leaders say.
There are now about 5,000 soldiers along NATO’s southeastern flank, the majority of whom are anchored at strategic locations near Romania’s coastline.
…Romania has emerged as the centerpiece of U.S. efforts to deter Russian aggression in southern Europe, while Poland has emerged as the Army’s center of gravity in the north.
***
“Our soldiers join the Army to do all sorts of things,” he said. “A bunch of them are eager. I’d say most of them are here to deploy. It’s not Iraq or Afghanistan, but they’re operating forward.…”
U.S. commanders in Romania emphasized that they are not on a “combat deployment,” but the mission carries with it a level of intensity unmatched when compared with the European troop rotations of recent years.
***
In some ways, the war in Ukraine has given momentum to a Pentagon vision that dates to the early 2000s, when the U.S. sought to expand rotations in newer NATO states like Romania and Poland, the so-called “new Europe,” rather than hunker down in the “old Europe” garrisons of Germany.
From the 101st Airborne’s forward headquarters at the air base near Constanta, known by the soldiers as “MK,” the fighting between Ukrainian and Russian forces in the Kherson region is about the distance from Washington, D.C. to Virginia Beach, Va.
***
The 101st’s mission in Europe is essentially twofold: monitor events in Ukraine for potential spillover into allied countries and incorporate lessons from the war into how American ground forces fight, he said.
Lithuania’s Defence Ministry has signed a deal to buy Switchblade 600 drones from the United States, becoming the first European NATO member to order the kamikaze system.
“We are the first country in the world after the United States to purchase the Switchblade 600. These combat drones are a new redeployable capability that will give the Lithuanian Army the ability to destroy enemy tanks and other armored vehicles at a distance of up to 40 kilometers. Our army has not had such a capacity until now,” Defence Minister Arvydas Anušauskas said in a ministerial statement.
The deal is worth about €45 million (U.S. $48 million), the statement said….
…Ukraine has used Switchblade 300 drones in battle. Likewise, other countries along Russia’s western front are purchasing combat UAVs. Poland, for example, leased a set of MQ-9A Reaper drones from General Atomics in October, and it’s preparing to purchase the unmanned aircraft. And Romania this month inked a framework agreement with Israel’s Elbit Systems to buy up to seven Watchkeeper X drones earlier this week.
***
The Switchblade 600 order comes shortly after Lithuania and the U.S. signed a $495 million deal for as many as eight M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems. Deliveries are scheduled for the 2025-2026 time frame.
The goal of the Kosovo Albanians’ hidden agenda is even more blatant now in broad political daylight in the midst of the Ukraine crisis, Тatiana Obrenovic writes.
The Serbs are ‘up on the barricades’ yet again. The Kosovo Albanians-only police officers keep provoking the local Serbs.
They harass the Serbs only and arrest the innocent Serbian civilians only in a quasi failed state of Kosovo (and Metohija).
For instance, one Serb was arrested and detained by the police only because he lives in the same building where the electoral committee is located. Then a few others as well in a matter of a few days in the past week.
The Shqiptari taking endless photos of themselves with their index fingers stuck on the triggers of their machine guns go to prove the unprecedented brutality and unscrupulousness of the Kosovo Albanians-only police officers.
The goal of their NATO-maneuvered hidden agenda is even more blatant now in broad political daylight in the midst of the Ukraine crisis in which the Collective West is gasping for a chance to rid themselves of the Kosovo skeleton in their political closets from their recent political past knowing only too well that they had breached the international law, that they had committed an act of illegal aggression against Serbia 1999 and that they massively assisted the local Kosovo Albanian stooges to self-proclaim their unconstitutional and illegal independence in 2008.
Strangely enough, whenever they keep trotting out that Serbia has to recognize part of its own country as an independent country, the Collective West and their jackals seem to be ignoring the glaring fact that not one single country in Europe had a part of its country brutally taken away from it. That they are forcefully trying to rob one part of our territory illegally and make a quasi failed state out of it. Quasi it already is. Failed as well. Very much so (the Columbia of Europe with drug trafficking, human trafficking, organ harvesting by the Shqiptari mafia to name but a few). Now the concerted effort of USA, EU, NATO and the Collective West per se find fault with this skeleton in their political closets and want rid of it and in doing so, they want to make sure they convince the whole world that it is in fact Russia that breached the international law in Russian special military operation in Ukraine.
But the Collective West seems to be encountering opposition from a number of other countries in that they point their fingers at the USA now and rightly so that NATO and the Collective West have done very much the same in a much worse, brutal way far too often against too many countries ever since the Second World War.
Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic has recently put a particular emphasis on this point in UN General Assembly that Kosovo was incidentally ‘recognized’ on false premises in 2008 and they also coerced a number of other countries to do the same under the ‘political duress’, which (his UN address to the audience) is something that the West were annoyed with to a great extent. They are very upset about President Vucic saying this in UN Security Council and the way they want to rid themselves of this issue and wash their hands is to possibly speed up the Serbian capitulation on this issue by pulling a card of ‘how attractive EU is for a quasi state of Kosovo’ and by promising appealing new investments so that Serbia is forcefully driven or literally kicked in her teeth into accepting the terms at gunpoint. After all, the Collective West had already done this sort of thing a few times: coercing Slobodan Milosević, Momir Bulatović, Ivica Dačić and a few more literally at gunpoint.
The collective West wants to ram through Kosovo – a quasi, failed state into the UN even without Serbia ‘recognizing it’ in the first place if ever but this recognition and ramming Kosovo into the UN and as many other possible organizations and unions as possible seems undoable and illusory. They are closing their political ranks in that they have deployed many other ways and tactics to try and do so they try to tease, provoke, pressurize and unnerve Serbia to get her derailed from her principled views and standpoints on Kosovo issue. Kosovo is granted the ‘ludicrously grandiose’ role of ‘agent provocateur’ on behalf of the Collective West to get Serbia entangled in the political quicksand. As part of their agenda, they are announcing new forms of ever more brutal provocations and possibly a controlled false flag incident in a political and real time battle of nerves in an endless number of provocations by the Shqiptari and those who pushed them into all this. Yes, yes, the striking similarity with those with Zelensky and the Kiev regime come to mind because we have seen all this in the mirror image of the crisis in Ukraine, though, way more brutally and then in Afghanistan, Libya, Siria and many others.
Take for instance, Petar Poroshenko who was ‘the arch mentor’ of the Minsk Agreements. Even he gave the very same statement six months ago that they never had planned to abide by them. One can establish a political parallel with what Kurti claimed in Berlin that Priština has never heard of the ‘Brussels Agreement and knows nothing about it. How arrogant can that man be? Poroshenko, Kurti’s NATO stooge counterpart in Ukraine said the very same thing. One would think that is too much of a coincidence.
So we can expect some future Merkel or Baerbock in five to six years to say that they had no intention of implementing the Brussels Agreement in Kosovo because they were merely buying more time. Catherine Ashton was the U.S. mediator at the time. President Vucic mentioned these agreements Serbia has signed and implemented a couple of days ago as follows:
1.Kumanovo Agreement, 2. UN Charter, 3.1244 Resolution,4. Brussels Agreement and 5.Washington Agreement.
Belgrade has implemented everything from the Brussels Agreement to its every dot. It is then obvious who keeps throwing spanners in the works of the Brussels Agreement and other agreements signed so far.
None of these have been enforced in this context of Kosmet on the part of NATO, EU or Pristina.
President Vucic may have not wanted to mention one more element for diplomatic reasons but these agreements which have not been enforced were in fact passed by the Collective West.
Pristina is not the subject in the international law which means that they are an irrelevant party in theory.
The Collective West were the ones to have passed these i.e. the signatures of the Collective West are on the documents and Serbian signatures are there too. Serbia has enforced all the required clauses in them.
Priština and the Collective West have done nothing to this day. There seems to be no room for diplomatic maneuver for Serbia within these current coordinates. Serbian Parliament members have unanimously agreed this week that they will officially seek KFOR to enforce the part of Resolution 1244 to bring back our forces up to 1000 police officers and soldiers with the explanation that the local Serbs are subject to most brutal and unbearable pogrom, even though Serbian President told that we would wait for KFOR and EULEX to do their fair share and that Serbia would put trust in EULEX and KFOR for the time being; Serbia will officially seek the return of our 1000 policemen and military to Kosovo and Metohija.
Clearly Serbia will encounter obstacles in getting this approval even if the formal reasons to do so may well be in Serbian favour
President Vučić reassured that we should put trust in KFOR and EULEX up until the moment the political opposite occurs.
If the Serbian request is declined, they will have to provide elaboration on the legal grounds and reasons for rejection.
It was a binding resolution and it gives the same significance to all its directives for both the Serbian and Albanian side in the conflict; both sides had to enforce all clauses in the Resolution under the threat of using armed forces by the Security Council if both sides did not enforce these for any reason. But the minute that the Resolution was signed and passed, NATO came up with some lame excuse for the postponement in that the KFOR commander was vested with the discretionary power to decide on their own to send military troops without any elaboration. It is up to the KFOR commander as a military expert to determine the appropriate moment to do that but that right moment has to be within a reasonable time span and one cannot prolong it forever. Zoran Djindjić, late Serbian Prime Minister (brutally assassinated in 2003 by an extended hand of NATO) has put forth the very same request from UN as well, Boris Tadić refused with the elaboration that our soldiers and policemen in that case would be mere political clay pigeons, who would have fallen prey to the Shqiptari extremists. If NATO wanted to do away with that mandatory duty for KFOR to be in charge within the reasonable time span, that is against the UN Security Council and the non-severability mandatory status of that Resolution integrally, which means that it must be enforced and executed abiding by its non-severability with not one directive to be less important than any other.
Lest we forget, the moment that Resolution was passed, Bernard Kushner arrived there, having been given the instructions from the Secretariat, then came Richard Holbrooke, U.S. Ambassador in the UN, to publicly ask Kushner to not heed the instructions from the Secretariat at all but to do what he deemed fit, In other words, he had ‘American’ ways of doing things in mind i.e. to deprive Serbia of any form of its own legal and political presence in Kosovo and Metohija ‘with utmost professional expedience’ i.e. as soon as possible at any cost. Which he did at unduly accelerated speed. Others simply followed suit. It meant the absence of U.S. ‘political good faith’ to apply this Resolution the way it was meant to, because it presupposed Serbian sovereignty over Kosovo and Metohija. If we touch upon the issue of sending military forces to Kosovo back to 2022 now, it will not change the relations of the military forces yet it will be a symbolic gesture to affirm and reaffirm the application of the Resolution. The U.S., by way of NATO, has been given discretionary power of ‘governing’ in Kosovo and Metohija in this way. Serbia can only assume that they will refuse to bring back our 1000 Serbian soldiers and police officers there under the false pretext that it is not the right moment to do so in which case Serbia must seek further explanation in the UN Security Council as to why Resolution 1244 is not being enforced with its essential non-severability aspect. Besides, it is incumbent upon Serbia to kindly request answers from NATO aka KFOR what has happened to the return of the displaced persons due to the war. Namely, they were to return to Kosovo and Metohija aided by KFOR and EULEX and the competent institutions. The list of the requests which Serbia is entitled to according to the Resolution 1244 is rather long and surely long overdue. Serbia is adamant that Kosovo and Metohija will always be part of Serbia no matter what. You can take our word and our Kosovski zavet for it.
Declan Hayes
Der Friedensstifter 