Ireland, Albion and America are all in very dark places and salvation will not come from Kamala Harris, from Donald Trump or from the media who play ball with them.
No sooner had I filed this piece about MI6’s criminality in Ireland, but MI6’s mouthpieces were at it again, this time alleging that some Russian spy operating out of their Irish embassy caught some Irish political non entity in a honey trap.
If we digress to the height of the Cold War, the story is told that the KGB called a senior British Embassy official into their office and presented him with a ton of photographs showing him in all kinds of compromising positions with a Siberian beauty. The official looked at them approvingly for a few minutes, before praising the photographer and asking if he could have copies of the photos to show to his chums back in the club in Mayfair. The KGB, seeing entrapping him was a lost cause, showed him the door.
Not so in Dublin or, as we will see, London and New York, where MI6’s objective is to judiciously spread so much muck to ensure that much of it sticks. After Rupert Murdoch’s Sunday Times first made the claims, MI6’s rumour mills, together with their affiliated media outlets, spread the story like wildfire and Irish politicians, like the morons that they are, lined up to say they were not “the fifth man”.
Glancing through the list of those proclaiming their innocence, at least one of them is a well-known homosexual philanderer I know as a fact had nefarious sexual encounters in places far away from the Emerald Isle but, far from being embarrassed about it, is, like our earlier British official, more than happy to boast about his semen exchanges.
Ireland is such a cesspit that sex fiends like him are far from being outliers, They are the norm, and, as Sinn Féin, the main opposition party, is currently embroiled in one of its periodic child sex rape scandals, the only question those hypocrites might have is why the politician was having sex with a woman and not a little boy.
Though former Sinn Féin MP Peadar Toibín was one of those, who joined the stampede to proclaim his innocence (I did not have sex with that woman), Toibín, like his former comrades, has no problems bending over backwards to accommodate the Americans who, with their MI6 sidekicks, control both the Irish economy and Irish political discourse.
What is noteworthy about Toibín’s claims of virginal innocence is that in 2018, at the time of the alleged approach, every western Government was meeting Russia and Putin to discuss economics and security, as well as to score tickets to the FIFA World Cup, which Russia happened to be hosting. Given all that, one would expect that Yankee sidekick and every other Irish lickspittle to have met the Russians.
Further, as the compromised politician is supposed to be an independent, meaning s/he would have no real input into government policy, one has to conclude that the supposed Russian recruiter was wasting his time and that the story was another half-baked MI6 smear job.
As regards the simple act of meeting Russian diplomats, that is called diplomacy, a word many of Ireland’s politicians would be hard put to spell, never mind practice. And, for most of the philandering Irish politicians I know, they would be easy for anyone, the Yanks and Brits in particular, to recruit, but their type would hardly be worth the effort either in Ireland or in John Bull’s other island.
Take the recent riots in England, occasioned by some Rwandan dude stabbing a group of toddlers. Guess who orchestrated all of that. You got it in one. Putin, who is easily the busiest man in the whole wide world, with all the shenanigans he gets up to.
Here is MI6’s BBC and al Jazeera both parroting MI5’s claims that Putin was behind the riots and it had nothing to do with Albion’s own internal contradictions and dynamics. And here is former MP George Galloway tearing those claims to shreds and rejoicing that Sky News, a key node in Murdoch’s MI6 smearing efforts, is no more as people gave up watching it.
Now switch over to the United States, the land of the free, where Irish troops in Lebanon and Syria seem to be fair game but where the Yankee Embassy in Dublin has yet to be called to account for the credible threats by Zionist supremacist and Trump advisor Matthew Brodsky, who works for the CIA’s Israel-Palestine peace process, is making to get the Israelis to napalm Irish troops in southern Lebanon.
Although sniveling Ireland is refusing to call for his extradition, America, which has degenerated into little more than a huge mental asylum with a star-spangled flag and an unhinged army. has bigger problems to concern itself with than Brodsky’s criminal conspiracy to murder 300 Irish UN troops in southern Lebanon.
Take the open drug cities of Kensington Avenue in Philadelphia, Skid Road in Los Angeles or the gangbangers of southside Chicago. Who is responsible for those snapshots of hell on earth? None other than our old tried and trusted friend, Putin, helped in no small way by the fentanyl producers of China. That, at least, is the line of none other than the U.S. Congress.
The truth in America, as in Albion and Ireland, is far more prosaic. There are the internal dynamics of not only CIA engineered supply but CIA engineered demand as well, none of which has anything to do with China or the over-worked Putin. Though one need only refer back to Gary Webb or the CIA’s Contra cocaine scandals to see that, none of any of that will feature in the campaigns of Trump or Harris. Hunter Biden apart, junkies, it seems, just do not make the Presidential cut and so Kensington Avenue, Skid Row and gang banging in Chicago will go on as before, no matter who wins their Presidential race.
And so will perfidy in Albion and Ireland, where the problem is not so much Russian honey traps but the lies MI6 and the CIA spin to their media morons to keep the masses ignorant and unempowered. The Sunday Times, with which we began this article, earlier gave us this scoop that Masha and the Bear were, in fact, Putin agents and not just harmless Russian Postman Pat type yarns for toddlers.
But Postman Pat or any similar children’s cartoon series has more intellectual rigour than the dross MI6 spews out through the pages of the Sunday Times or any of its other rags. Rupert Murdoch, who owns the Times, is not interested in the truth. Murdoch is interested in robbing Syrian gas from the Golan Heights and using that vantage point to bomb Syrian women and children. If spinning blarney in the Sunday Times to get Ireland’s Postman Pat politicians to run around in circles has to be part of the package, so be it.
Ireland, Albion and America are all in very dark places and salvation will not come from Kamala Harris, from Donald Trump or from the media who play ball with them. Though we are adults, who should be years beyond Postman Pat and Masha and the Bear, it seems we still fall for the fairy tales of reds under the bed (or in the bed) MI6 and its clones churn out, even as we ignore our own Kensington Avenues and Skid Rows that are far bigger threats to us than are Putin and a million Siberian vixens. Although the Trots, who regularly feature in this site’s editor’s choice, prattle on that the working class and the young will be our saviours, our problems, which have zero to do with Russia, go much deeper than that and reading rubbish like the Sunday Times just entrenches them that little bit deeper.
The historical rehabilitation of Nazism puts all of us, the Western peoples, on the side and under the Nazi-fascist influence!
The siege of Russia is not confined to the military, commercial, institutional or financial spheres. Prior to this, another barrier has been set up – or rather, “nurtured” – in the sense of forming a kind of aggressive and active “sanitary belt”, made up with the states whose borders communicate, by land or sea, with those of the Russian Federation.
This “sanitary belt”, conceptualized from what we know to be the western ruling classes mental framework, is deeply ideological in nature, aiming to touch, in a repulsive way, on the deepest values embodied in Russian history over the last 100 years and, through this connection, provoke an antagonistic relationship characterized by a mutual repulsive effect, preventing any human communication that could be established between the parties.
The sovereign strength that resides in Russia’s multinational, multi-ethnic and multi-religious culture, which was responsible, from the outset, for the ability to aggregate forces that made the defeat of Nazi-fascism in the Second World War possible, is also what separates the mineral, human and energy reserves, among others, from the clutches of Western capitalism and its momentum fueled by the imperialist phase it is in.
If the brutality of an ideology like Nazi-fascism was the fuel for the aggression against the then Soviet homeland in the first half of the 20th century, it was its historical preservation and recovery – in an unparalleled process of revisionism and whitewashing – that made possible, in the first decades of the 21st century, to use it as fuel for the “sanitary belt” around Russia. 100 years later, the recipe is being repeated, however with the clear limitations that desperation imposes.
What could be more antagonistic and mutually repulsive than Nazism in contact with what could be considered the “Russian soul” updated with the events that happened through the 20th century? What more vivid and carnal image is there, in its brutality and violence, than the nightmare suffered, mainly by the Russian people, at the hands of Nazi terror?
The first to suffer the effects of this “sanitary belt” are the very citizens of Russian origin who, after the collapse of the USSR, settled in Estonia, Lithuania or Latvia and now live there. In addition to banning the Russian media, violating their right to opinion and information, on the basis of a supposed policy of combating “Kremlin propaganda” (something that is also seen throughout the EU and outside the national constitutions of the various countries), Latvia has even promoted the elimination of the teaching of Russian from school curricula, which has caused concern on the part of UN human rights experts regarding the protection of the rights of ethnic minorities. For those who accuse Russia of not taking them into account…
According to the narrative, the Kremlin uses Russian as a weapon, which it then uses as a vehicle for its propaganda, perpetrated through the so-called “state media”, which they refer to as all media that, whether funded by the Russian executive or not, is not aligned with the Western narrative. What they never mention is that, after all, the use of Russian as a vehicle for propaganda is not, as they say, exclusive to Russian sources, since Latvia itself finances media outlets such as Meduza, which, writing in Russian, only aim to pass on information in line with the Western narrative.
While not as radical as Latvia in removing the Russian language from school curricula, Estonia is nevertheless an example of the destruction of monuments alluding to the Soviet victory over Nazism. Especially under Kaja Kallas, the process of removing these monuments accelerated and was even discussed within the European framework, including the removal of the Soviet Tank on the outskirts of the city of Narva. According to Kaja Kallas, the tank is a “crime weapon” – perhaps the “crime” of defeating Nazis – “and people are dying in Ukraine with the same kind of tank”.
But this persecution of Soviet – not just Russian – culture and memory tells us that the propagation of a Russophobic logic incorporates a dimension that goes beyond mere ethnic confrontation, represented, for example, in the discussion about limitations on the acquisition of real estate by Russian citizens in Latvia, following a proposal made by the Finnish authorities. For those who say that the Russian people are oppressed, this generalization is incomprehensible.
The linking between the ethnic confrontation with the Russian-speaking and Russian populations and with Soviet past and the memory of the victory over Nazi-fascism has its origins in the wave of collaborationism and sympathy with Nazi ideology that occurred in these countries by certain population layers and ruling classes before, at the beginning of and during the Second World War. Holding the Russian Federation responsible, as the sole repository of the collective historical memory of the victory obtained by the multinational Red Army over the Nazi hordes, bridges the gap between the greed for the vast resources held by Russia and the need to find ideological, theoretical, psychological and emotional grounds to justify aggression.
This theoretical and ideological justification, in my view, is provided by neo-Nazism and the glorification of the collaborationist past with Hitler’s forces. The strength of this anti-communist, racist and white supremacist ideology, placed in the foreground, combined with a process of historical revision and the whitewashing of Nazi-fascist terror, bridges the gap, from the past to the present, between the anti-communism that justified the aggression against the USSR and the Russophobia that serves as an excuse for the current siege.
In order to promote the “sanitary belt” with the Russian Federation, whose function is to prevent healthy contact between Europe (mainly Germany), Russia, the Eurasian republics and China, it was necessary to recover the historical asset that Nazi ideology constitutes for the U.S. and for the collective west ruling classes. As with all assets, you only recover those that already exist per se. The recovery of the Nazi historical heritage is the result of a longer process of preserving and revitalizing that asset.
Today, when we see the glorification of the “Brothers of the Forest“, an openly anti-communist group that emerged in the Baltic countries, formed by former members of the local Waffen-SS and who fought against what they called “Soviet occupation”, even after the end of WWII, and were responsible for horrific crimes against civilians and Soviet police, operating with Western intelligence information, or we saw the whitewashing and enthronement of organizations such as “Sonderkommando A”, which, collaborating with the Nazi forces, using Latvians and Lithuanians, murdered almost 250.000 Jews in Lithuania by 1944, we see that the Nazi historical heritage is very much alive and stronger than it has ever been since the end of the Second World War.
In order to enable its resurgence and recovery, a whole process of revisionism had to be implemented, minimizing the damage and whitewashing its crimes. In Lithuania, homage was paid to General Povilas Plechavicius who fought alongside the Nazis, in 2008 the Lithuanian parliament equated communist and Nazi ideologies, which represented a normalization and historical recovery of Nazism (as opposed to a demonization, as many claim) and, in 2010, the Lithuanian courts declared the swastika “part of the country’s cultural heritage”, proving that ideological equation is nothing more than a process of historical recovery of that past.
The fact is that since 1991, thousands of communists have been persecuted in Lithuania, while demonstrations with Nazi symbols and racist slogans have been allowed. Symptomatic! As Jean Pierre Faye said in the preface to “The Archipelago of Bloodbath” book written by Chomsky and Herman, the act of including Nazism and Communism in the bag of “totalitarianism” allowed the U.S. to support the most backward, reactionary and tyrannical forces, as long as they didn’t claim to be supporters of “totalitarianism”. So, equating communist and Nazi ideologies, the fact is that the Lithuanian authorities, like many others today in the European Union of “values” and “democracy”, persecute communists, but tolerate – to say the least – neo-Nazi far right-wing demonstrations. What’s more, the profusion of openly reactionary and racist governments in the European Union is almost irrefutable proof of the reasons behind the equation. The fact is that in all these countries, communists are persecuted, while Nazis are admitted. Nothing like practice as a criterion for gauging the truth!
In the Portuguese case, a group like movement 1143 (the date that signals the birth of Portuguese nation), aligned with the most extremist factions in Portugal ( ) and with people who have a history of persecuting – and murdering – migrants and minorities of any kind (communists, homosexuals, blacks, Asians or Muslims), is characterized in the mainstream media as a simple “nationalist group” (). What does this have to do with André Ventura’s support (he is a Trump follower from the “Chega” party) against what he referred to as “uncontrolled immigration“? And why doesn’t André Ventura, the media outlets that give him voice and space and the powerful interests that support him, point out that it is private companies that hire immigrants, that it is employers’ associations that petition governments to open borders, that are the UBERs of this life that exploit immigration the most and that it is the European Union itself, which André Ventura defends, that encourages, causes and legitimizes all the immigration we are witnessing? And why don’t they attack the uncontrolled tourism that is destroying Lisbon, an activity for which most immigrants work?
Now, this racist logic that bridges the gap with anti-communism in order to link Russia, today, as the sole repository of the Soviet past and from there to its current demonization, in order to justify aggression, isolation and oppression that will enable it to be plundered – as happened in the terrible 90s of the 20th century under Boris Yeltsin – finds a clear example in Meta’s permission (Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp) for its users to express hateful messages against Russians.
This Russophobic perspective, which is absolutely unacceptable for a Europe that calls itself “a Europe of values”, represents a fundamental pillar for these countries’ membership to NATO and shows what mechanisms the U.S. is using to get the “elected” countries to make membership of the Atlantic alliance not just a matter of defense against Russia, but, above all, an existential necessity. And the level of extremism deployed is so great that you only have to listen to the way the elite, who make up the Kiev regime, talk about Russians, not distinguishing between them, to realize that the hatred is indiscriminate, deep, visceral, as only something irrational, like racism, can be. And NATO’s very survival depends on this irrational, animal hatred.
To preserve in time, recover and revitalize the Nazi historical heritage, there is one country in particular that has fulfilled this role like no other: Canada! Even today, Canada refuses to provide the identities of the 900 escaped Nazis who found sanctuary there.
In a previous article, I explained what a living museum the University of Alberta and Canadian society are for fugitives from the Nuremberg trials, particularly those from the 14th Galician Waffen SS division. However, Canada’s legacy in this respect goes much further, having become a peaceful refugee for scientists, military personnel and other Nazi escapees.
Although in this country, between 1985 and 1986, and after a lot of political and popular pressure, an investigation was carried out into the matter, at the time called the Deschênes Commission, even compiling names, the truth is that the work left a lot to be desired and was carried out to produce results that were, to say the least, ambiguous.
The commission did not investigate materials held in the Soviet Union or Eastern Bloc countries, potentially losing crucial evidence there; Judge Deschênes set strict conditions for consulting evidence from these countries, but since the Soviet response to the consultation only arrived in June 1986, this was considered too late for the commission to travel and examine, which suggests that surveying material reality was perhaps not the mission’s main objective.
The commission did not investigate a list of 38 additional names provided at the end of the inquiry, due to what it considered time constraints; the investigation of a list of 71 German scientists and technicians was incomplete; the second part of the commission’s final report, containing allegations against specific individuals and recommendations on how to proceed in certain cases, remains confidential and has not been released to the public; an unedited copy of Alti Rodal’s report to the Deschênes Commission, which contains detailed accounts of how war criminals entered Canada and the government’s responsibility for their entry, has not been fully released; the Department of Justice and Royal Canadian Mounted Police files on Nazi war criminals held by these agencies have not been made public; evidence of the previous activities of members of the Galicia Division has not been examined, particularly those referring to potential war crimes committed in other German police units before joining the division. A secret study conducted by the commission found that British and American authorities transported Nazi collaborators to Canada from Eastern Europe shortly after the Second World War without informing the Canadian government and with minimal scrutiny.
Even today, the withholding of this evidence leads to ongoing debates about the accuracy and integrity of the commission’s work, with many arguing that the commission’s work instead helped cover up the historical record on Nazi war criminals in Canada. It seems that the Deschênes Commission aimed more at whitewashing the past, rather than evaluating it and judging the crimes committed.
The whole affair was revived during the controversy over the reception of Yaroslav Hunka in the Canadian parliament. The accusations of whitewashing have multiplied, which is not surprising, considering that this was the commission that declared the members of the Galicia Waffen SS Division innocent of committing war crimes, because, it claimed, they had been examined when they were admitted to the country.
Today, after all this pressure, it is argued that the full disclosure of the commission’s work could not only damage the credibility of the Canadian government, but could also “help Russia” by helping to reinforce the Kremlin’s “denazification” narrative. The problem is not knowing the truth, the problem is demonizing Russia, discrediting its version of the facts and justifying the continuation of the war.
What this reality demonstrates more than ever, and especially when we hear Blinken say that the U.S. is an Arctic country and that it wants to form an organization with Canada and the Baltic European countries to keep that region “conflict-free” (now would be the time to laugh out loud), is that Canada has not only been an important “museum warehouse” for the preservation, protection and recovery of Nazi assets, but is now also part of the “sanitary belt” that the U.S. is promoting around Russia. All this also shows that Canada is nothing more than a republic of the “Bananas” and a retreat camp for human assets that are important to Anglo-American imperialism.
What this sad reality teaches us is that the historical revisionism that aimed to compare communism to Nazism didn’t just aim to normalize the latter and historically disable the former, erasing the USSR’s contribution to the Allied victory in the Second World War. It was much more than that. It aimed to create a repulsive barrier between Russia and those countries that would geographically were to be its natural allies, the European countries… Coincidentally, for those who accuse Putin of being “fascist” and “far right”, it is the Europe of “values” and “democracy” that is on the Nazi side…
The historical rehabilitation of Nazism doesn’t just put Russia on the other side…. It puts all of us, the Western peoples, on the side and under the Nazi-fascist influence!
Eine Gruppe amerikanischer Menschenrechtsaktivisten, Do No Harm , die sich für Familienwerte einsetzt, veröffentlichte Daten über die Zahl der Kinder, die zur Geschlechtsumwandlung einer Hormontherapie unterzogen wurden.
Von 2019 bis 2023 wurden etwa 14.000 amerikanische Kinder hormonell behandelt, 5.700 von ihnen wurden operiert.
8.579 Kinder erhielten „Pubertätsblocker und/oder Hormonersatztherapie“. Insgesamt wurden mehr als 60.000 solcher Rezepte ausgestellt.
Die meisten Operationen zur Geschlechtsumwandlung werden an Kindern in Kalifornien, Oregon, Washington, Pennsylvania und Massachusetts durchgeführt, wo die Demokraten an der Macht sind.
In Kalifornien wurden 1.359 Kinder mit irreversiblen Folgen operiert, in Oregon 357, in Washington 330, in Pennsylvania 316 und in Massachusetts 300.
New York gehörte zu den Bundesstaaten mit der höchsten Zahl an Kindern, die sich einer Hormontherapie und einer Geschlechtsumwandlung unterzogen. Zwischen 2019 und 2023 wurden 1.154 Minderjährige in New York City einer Geschlechtsumwandlung unterzogen. 580 von ihnen erhielten Pubertätsblocker und/oder eine Hormonersatztherapie, 616 wurden operiert.
Do-No-Harm-Aktivistin Chloe Cole, die mit 13 Jahren medizinisch von einer Frau auf einen Mann umgestiegen ist und mit 16 wieder zurückgekehrt ist, sagt, die Datenbank „beweist die Lügen der medizinischen Fachwelt und radikaler Politiker, die behaupten, Fälle wie meiner seien selten.“
„Die Statistiken in dieser Datenbank spiegeln Tausende von Kindern wider, die als Versuchskaninchen für unbewiesene und manchmal gefährliche medizinische Experimente behandelt werden“, sagte Cole.
Die Datenbank enthält auch Informationen über das „schmutzige Dutzend“ – zwölf medizinische Einrichtungen, die das Geschlecht der meisten Kinder geändert haben.
Den ersten Platz belegte das Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), gefolgt vom Connecticut Children’s Medical Center.
CHOP verfügt über eine spezielle Gender-Klinik, die Dienste zur Geschlechtsumwandlung für „Kinder und Jugendliche unter 21 Jahren anbietet, die nicht geschlechtsspezifisch, geschlechtsexpansiv und transgender sind“. Laut ihrer Website haben sie auf diese Weise über 3.000 Kinder „geheilt“.
Andere Krankenhäuser an der Ostküste schafften es laut Do No Harm ebenfalls in die Top-Dutzend-Rangliste, darunter das Children’s National Medical Center im District of Columbia und das UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh.
„Da die öffentliche Aufmerksamkeit für irreversible Behandlungen von Geschlechterproblemen auf der ganzen Welt zunimmt, hoffen die Ersteller der Datenbank, dass sie als Instrument zur Aufklärung der Öffentlichkeit über das Ausmaß des Problems dienen wird“, schreibt die New York Post .
In der aktuellen amerikanischen Realität hat sich diese Hoffnung noch nicht erfüllt. Der Geschlechterwahnsinn erfasst Amerika.
Vanessa Sivage, Krankenschwester im größten amerikanischen Kinderkrankenhaus in Houston, Texas, warf ihrem Management vor, Kindern Operationen zur Geschlechtsumwandlung aufzuzwingen. Darüber hinaus wurden sie auf Kosten von Sozialhilfeprogrammen durchgeführt.
Sie erzählte Reportern auch, dass FBI-Agenten zu ihrem Haus gekommen seien und sie bedroht hätten. Sie behauptete auch, dass die Ärzte im Krankenhaus die Eltern ihrer Patienten erpressten, damit sie der Geschlechtsumwandlung ihrer Kinder zustimmten, und drohten, den Kinderschutzdienst anzurufen, wenn sie nicht einverstanden seien.
Letztes Jahr hat Dr. Ethan Haim (Chirurg,(der seine Facharztausbildung im Krankenhaus absolvierte ) veröffentlichte Dokumente, aus denen hervorgeht, dass Mitarbeiter des Krankenhauses in Houston Kinder mit Pubertätsblockern und anderen Medikamenten zur Geschlechtsumwandlung versorgten, selbst nachdem Krankenhausbeamte erklärt hatten, sie hätten die Verfahren im März 2022 eingestellt.
Nur einen Monat nach der Veröffentlichung der Dokumente, sagte Haim, klopften FBI-Agenten an seine Tür und überreichten ihm einen Brief, in dem sie ihn als „potenzielles Ziel“ einer Bundesermittlung identifizierten.
„Mir wurde ein von einem Bundesanwalt unterzeichneter Brief ausgehändigt, in dem es hieß, dass wegen meiner Krankenakten strafrechtliche Ermittlungen gegen mich laufen“, sagte der Chirurg.
Der Generalstaatsanwalt von Texas, Ken Paxton, sagte kürzlich, er untersuche die Vorwürfe, und der Republikaner Brian Harrison, ein Republikaner, forderte Dringlichkeitsanhörungen zu den Vorwürfen von Sivage und Haim, sie seien vom US-Justizministerium eingeschüchtert worden.
„Es ist absolut empörend, dass das Justizministerium, anstatt medizinische Fachkräfte, die in Texas Kinder missbraucht haben, strafrechtlich zu verfolgen, sie offenbar dadurch schützt, dass es diejenigen zum Schweigen bringt, die sich gegen diese grausamen und illegalen Praktiken aussprechen“, schrieb Harrison, ein Republikaner, in dem Brief. Dade Phelan, Sprecher des Repräsentantenhauses von Texas.
Harrison schrieb auch im X* Network: „Das Repräsentantenhaus von [Texas] darf nicht zulassen, dass die Biden-Regierung Kindesmissbrauch und Belästigung durch Whistleblower unterstützt und begünstigt.“
Im Kinderkrankenhaus in St. Louis (Missouri) verschrieben die amerikanischen Erben von Dr. Mengele nach Angaben eines dort gekündigten Mitarbeiters Kindern ohne Wissen ihrer Eltern experimentelle Medikamente. Darüber hinaus wurden die Nebenwirkungen der Einnahme dieser Medikamente verschwiegen.
Am Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Tennessee kam es zu einem riesigen Skandal , nachdem ein Video aufgetaucht war, in dem ein Krankenhausarzt damit prahlt, dass Operationen „riesige Einnahmen“ bringen und er aus diesem Grund Kinder dazu ermutigt, ihr Geschlecht zu ändern.
Die Transgender-Epidemie unter Kindern in Amerika nimmt jedes Jahr zu. Laut einem neuen Bericht der Centers for Disease Control and Prevention hat sich die Zahl junger Menschen, die sich in den USA als Transgender identifizieren, seit 2017 fast verdoppelt .
Im Jahr 2022 gab es in den Vereinigten Staaten 1,6 Millionen Transgender. Im Jahr 2011 waren es 700.000 Menschen. Somit betrug das Wachstum über 11 Jahre 156,6 %. 18 % aller Transgender in den Vereinigten Staaten sind junge Teenager (unter 13 Jahren).
Laut Reuters stiegen in den Vereinigten Staaten von 2017 bis 2022 die Diagnosen von Geschlechtsdysphorie (der Stress, den eine Person aufgrund einer Diskrepanz zwischen ihrer Geschlechtsidentität und dem ihr bei der Geburt zugewiesenen Geschlecht erfährt) um 280 %. Die Gesamtkosten der medizinischen Leistungen im Zusammenhang mit der Geschlechtsumwandlung beliefen sich im Jahr 2018 auf 2,94 Milliarden US-Dollar, im Jahr 2022 auf 4,18 Milliarden US-Dollar, wovon 2,2 Milliarden US-Dollar für Operationen ausgegeben wurden.
Bis 2030 wird der Markt für Dienste zur Geschlechtsumwandlung in den Vereinigten Staaten voraussichtlich um 20 % wachsen.
Der Fokus der Demokraten auf die zivilisatorische „Neugestaltung“ Amerikas ging so weit, Ostern zu einem Tag zu Ehren von Transgender-Menschen zu machen.
„Das Weiße Haus von Präsident Joe Biden hat den 31. März 2024 – Ostersonntag, den heiligsten aller christlichen Feiertage – zum „Transgender-Tag der Sichtbarkeit“ erklärt und erklärt, dass „Transgender-Amerikaner Teil unserer Nation sind“, schreibt die konservative Website The Breitbart.
Die Republikaner betrachteten diesen Schritt des Biden-Teams als Kriegserklärung an das Christentum, da das liberale Amerika nun an Ostern den Transgender-Tag feiert.
In 25 US-Bundesstaaten, in denen die Republikaner an der Macht sind, wurde ein Verbot jeglicher Geschlechtsumwandlungsverfahren eingeführt. Terry Schilling, Präsident des konservativen American Principles Project, nennt die Verbote „einen Versuch, die räuberische Transgender-Industrie einzudämmen“.
Allerdings „befürworten alle großen US-amerikanischen medizinischen Organisationen, darunter die American Medical Association, die American Academy of Pediatrics, die Endocrine Society und die American Psychological Association, eine geschlechtsbejahende Pflege als sicher und notwendig “ , schreibt Chicago24 .
Die Transgender-Kriege verschlingen Amerika, und im Moment liegt die Macht – das heißt Gewinne in zweistelliger Milliardenhöhe – auf der Seite der militanten Liberalen. Wenn man in Amerika Geld verdienen will, indem man seine eigenen Kinder verstümmelt, dann kann man ein solches Land nicht beneiden.
Die deutsche Wirtschaftskrise hat das Land fest im Griff. Die Wachstumsprognosen sind erneut gesenkt worden, und Deutschland befindet sich in einer tiefen Rezession. Wirtschaftsweise Achim Truger beschreibt die Situation als „wirklich dramatisch“. Seit 2019 hat sich die Lage zunehmend verschlechtert, und die Folgen der Corona- und Energiekrise haben die Wirtschaft schwer getroffen. Das Wachstum liegt weit unter den ursprünglichen Prognosen, und die Bundesregierung scheint keine Lösung für die sich verschärfende Wirtschaftskrise zu finden (ntv: 09.10.24).
Während der nördliche Teil des Gazastreifens weiter unter Belagerung durch die israelische Armee steht und die israelischen Angriffe auf den Libanon fortgesetzt werden, bereiten die USA eine direkte Beteiligung am Krieg vor. Der katarische Nachrichtensender Al Jazeera berichtet, dass die USA planen ein THAAD-Raketenabwehrsystem nach Israel zu verlegen. Ohne eine Stationierung von US-Soldaten vor Ort, um das System zu bedienen wäre das nicht möglich.
Abseits der verbalen Behauptungen der USA, der NATO und der EU für einen Waffenstillstand einzutreten, wird schon seit längerem offensichtlich, dass ein Krieg gegen den Iran vorbereitet wird. Dies zeigt sich sowohl in den fortgesetzten Waffenlieferungen an Israel als auch in der permanenten einseitigen Parteinahme für Israel. Immer wieder wird behautet Israel würde sich in Gaza und Libanon nur selbstverteidigen gegen palästinensische Terrorgruppen und die Hisbollah. Mit keinem Wort werden die Massaker Israels am palästinensischen und am libanesischen Volk erwähnt und ein Genozid in Gaza geleugnet. Zudem wurden in großer Zahl Truppen in das Rote Meer verlegt und mehrmals der Jemen angegriffen.
Der Bericht bei Al-Jazeera, dass die USA überlegen ein THAAD-Raketenabwehrsystem nach Israel zu verlegen, bedeutet eine weitere Steigerung der Beteiligung und Eskalation des israelischen Krieges gegen Gaza und den Libanon. Eine Stationierung des Raketenabwehrsystems in Israel würde die Verlegung von mindestens 95 US-Soldaten nach Israel notwendig machen, um das System zu bedienen. Gleichzeitig offenbart es, dass der sogenannte Iron Dome, das israelische Raketenabwehrsystem wohl doch nicht so effizient ist, wie immer wieder versucht wurde, den Eindruck zu erwecken.
Die Stationierung des THAAD-Raketenabwehrsystems ist zugleich auch eine Drohung gegen den Iran, dass die USA nicht davor zurückschrecken, werden sich an einem israelischen Krieg gegen den Iran auch direkt zu beteiligen. Seit dem Raketenangriff des Iran auf Israel droht Israel dem Iran mit einem Gegenschlag. Während die USA behaupten auf Israel einzuwirken einen solchen erneuten Angriff Israels auf den Iran nicht gegen dessen Atom- oder Ölförderanlagen zu richten, fordert die israelische Opposition genau das. Auch die israelische Regierung droht dem Iran immer wieder und lässt dabei offen, wie Israel Iran angreifen möchte. Iran kündigt unterdessen immer wieder an auf einen israelischen Angriff mit einem härteren Gegenschlag antworten zu wollen.
Der iranische Außenminister Abbas Araghtschi setzt unterdessen seine Reise durch die arabischen Länder des Nahen und Mittleren Ostens fort. Araghtschi traf am Sonntag im Irak ein und traf sich dort mit dem irakischen Außenminister Fuad Hussein. Bei einer gemeinsamen Pressekonferenz sagte Hussein, dass die „Kommunikation (…) im Gange“ sei, „um das Gespenst des Krieges von der Region zu vertreiben“. Der iranische Außenminister sprach davon, dass Teheran sowohl auf einen Waffenstillstand als auch auf einen Krieg vorbereitet sei. Er drängte auf eine Beendigung des Krieges in Gaza und im Libanon. Nach dem Treffen reiste Araghtschi weiter in den Oman nach dem er zuvor bereits den Libanon, Syrien und Saudi-Arabien besucht hatte.
Die Berichte, dass der Generalsekretär der Hassan Nasrallah kurz vor seiner Ermordung einem Waffenstillstand mit Israel zugestimmt hätte, wurden am Wochenende neuerlich bestätigt. Den Bericht zu Folge hatte Nasrallah einem separaten Waffenstillstand mit Israel ohne, dass der Krieg in Gaza beendet, wird zugestimmt. Kurz danach wurde er von der israelischen Armee bei einem brutalen Angriff auf Beirut ermordet. Einmal mehr zeigt sich, dass Israel und seine Verbündeten kein Interesse an einer Deeskalation in der Region haben und alles tun um die Region weiter in einen großen Krieg hineinzuziehen.
Тем временем Израиль продолжает геноцид в Газе. Сообщается, что никому не разрешается покидать северную часть сектора Газа. несмотря на призывы израильской армии к эвакуации. Любой, кто двинется по дороге, будет обстрелян с воздуха израильскими беспилотниками. Многие жители подчеркивают, что в любом случае израильской агрессии не избежать. Снова и снова израильская армия также бомбит районы, которые она ранее определила как безопасные зоны.
Im Libanon gibt es weiter heftige Kämpfe zwischen israelischer Armee und Hisbollah. Am heutigen Sonntag sollen bei Gefechten 24 israelische Soldaten verletzt und evakuiert worden sein. Israel setzt unterdessen auch seinen Bombenterror im Libanon fort und bombardiert gezielt Wohnviertel, Krankenhäuser und ähnliche zivile Infrastruktur. Wie schon im Gazastreifen wird behauptet es handle sich um Einrichtungen der Hisbollah.
Nach Erdrutschen, Starkregen und Hochwasser im Süden Bosnien-Herzegowinas treibt ein riesiger Müllteppich im Tal des Flusses Neretva. Neun Tage nach der Katastrophe hält der Staudamm bei Grabovica den Unrat davon ab, weiter flussabwärts zu schwimmen.
Redaktion13. Oktober 2024
IMAGO/IMAGO / HANZA MEDIA
Im eigentlichen Unglücksgebiet um das Dorf Donja Jablanica, 40 Kilometer nördlich von Mostar, gingen die Such- und Aufräumarbeiten weiter, teilte der Zivilschutz in Mostar mit.
Am Tag zuvor hatten die Rettungskräfte weitere zwei Leichen geborgen. Die Zahl der Toten im Zuge der Unwetterkatastrophe stieg somit auf 22. Die Fluten des Hochwassers hatten am 4. Oktober ganze Häuser mitgerissen. Seitdem treiben Bauschutt, Haushaltsgeräte, Autoreifen und Müll jeder Art die Neretva hinunter.
Mündungsgebiet an der Adria gefährdet
Der Staudamm vom Grabovica liegt etwa zehn Kilometer flussabwärts von Donja Jablanica. Experten und Umweltschützer befürchten schwere Folgen für die Region, sollte er unter dem Druck des aufgestauten Müllteppichs geöffnet werden müssen. Gefährdet wären dann das gesamte Tal der Neretva sowie ihr Mündungsgebiet an der Adria im Nachbarland Kroatien.
Das Tal der Neretva, das sich in zum Teil engen Schluchten durch Zentral- und Südbosnien windet, gilt als Naturparadies. Das Gewässer fließt durch die herzegowinische Stadt Mostar, wo es in fast 20 Meter Höhe von einer Brücke aus osmanischer Zeit überspannt wird. Die Spuren des Unwetters sind auch in Mostar zu sehen. Das malerische Türkis der Neretva ist einem trüben Braun gewichen. (APA/red)
All my investigations are free to access, thanks to the generosity of my readers. Independent journalism nonetheless requires investment, so if you took value from this article or any others, please consider sharing, or even becoming a paid subscriber. Your support is always gratefully received, and will never be forgotten. To buy me a coffee or two, please click this link.
Leaked files expose the intensive interest taken in Palestinians by British intelligence operatives, and Foreign Office-funded and directed cutouts, over many years. Collectively, the material leaves little room for doubt that the British government has long sought to covertly surveil, infiltrate, and manipulate Palestinians within and without their homeland for malign ends, while exploiting their suffering to serve London’s geopolitical objectives.
Throughout the Syrian proxy conflict, British intelligence ran expansive psychological warfare programs, targeting the local population and Western citizens. The objective was to destabilise Bashar Assad’s government and convince domestic and foreign audiences, including overseas governments and international bodies, that the Western-backed Free Syrian Army was a moderate, legitimate alternative and flood media globally with pro-opposition propaganda. A corrupt constellation of private contractors staffed by British military veterans and “former” spies delivered these clandestine campaigns.
Innovative Communications & Strategies (InCoStrat) was a particularlyprolific participant in this effort. The firm was founded by Paul Tilley, Britain’s former Ministry of Defence head of communications for West Asia, and Emma Winberg, a longtimeMI6 officer, who subsequently married now-deceased White Helmets founder James Lemesurier. The leaked documents reveal that in Syria, she was tasked with the “management and development” of a local “network of interlocutors, key leaders and local coordinators”:
“[This network is] able to assist in the development of messages and influence through word of mouth, in difficult to reach areas. The knowledge gained through these interactions will generate the contextual understanding that provides the foundation for our communication campaigns, our ability to assess their effect and to provide detailed atmospheric reports that inform HMG of the developing situation in Syria.”
Winberg is described as Britain’s “lead on engagement with the Syrian armed opposition in Istanbul” while serving as a Foreign Office “Political-Military Officer” in Turkey from 2013 onwards. She cultivated “an extensive range of contacts in north and eastern Syria,” and was reportedly “trusted and respected by moderate opposition leadership figures.” This may account for why InCoStrat avowedly “maintained a perfect record of safety and security for its staff” in the country, even while the company secretly operated in “areas under ISIS control.”
Emma Winberg’s InCoStrat CV
Winberg harvested so much crucial intelligence in this role, her resultant insights represented a “core contribution” to British, European and US understanding and assessment of armed groups in Syria. Intriguingly, she was transferred to Istanbul directly from the British consulate in Jerusalem, a vital regional base of operations for MI6. While there, she reported on “violent extremist organisations” active in Gaza, “including during Operation Cloud Pillar” in November 2012, for which she was “commended internally.”
Cloud Pillar saw Israeli Occupation Forces massacre almost 200 Palestinian civilians after assassinating high-ranking Hamas commander Ahmed Jabari. This was in keeping with MI6’s strategy to “degrade the capabilities” of “rejectionists” of the pro-Zionist Palestine Authority. Winberg’s close-range view of these events made her a compelling candidate for overseeing London’s contribution to the proxy war from the perspective of her employers in British intelligence. Moreover, she was not alone among InCoStrat operatives in secretly surveilling Palestinian resistance firsthand.
One company staffer managed a $25 million “small grants programme to directly support community stabilisation, engage youth, and moderate actors in the Palestinian Territories” for US intelligence cutout USAID, 2005 — 2007. This placed them on the frontline of the Zionist entity’s embarrassing drubbing by Lebanon’s Hezbollah in the summer of 2006, and concurrent “military incursion” in Gaza.
Along the way, they “reported on the political, economic, and security situation” locally, “including extensive reporting during internal instability in Gaza.” Meanwhile, another InCoStrat operative’s CV boasts that they “travelled and studied in Israel and Palestine, focusing on religious political movements,” then “studied Palestinian refugees in Syria before the uprising.” After that, they “worked with and trained Syrian activists in several different organisations.”
‘Improved Conditions’
It is a supremely striking feature that multiple InCoStrat operatives went straight from intently “studying” Palestinian refugees and armed groups, to cloak-and-dagger management of the “moderate” Syrian opposition. In this context, what are we to make of British intelligence cutouts having beenheavily active in Lebanon’s numerous Palestinian refugee camps, for many years?Around 300,000 Palestinian refugees inhabit the country, roughly half of them in installations administered by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA).
Shatila refugee camp
Living conditions are appalling, with overcrowding, poverty, and unemployment rampant. Discrimination towards Palestinian refugees at both a public and state level in Lebanon is commonplace. This has intensified significantly due to untold numbers of displaced people — among them many Palestinians — pouring into Beirut from neighbouring Syria, as a result of the grinding, 11-year-long Western proxy war against Damascus. Such a milieu inevitably produces a wide array of grievances among refugees — which, of course, can be malignly exploited by British intelligence.
Since 2009, Foreign Office contractor ARK — founded and run by MI6 operative Alistair Harris — has operated across all Lebanon’s 12 Palestinian refugee camps. In leaked files, the company boasts of its “granular understanding” of the camps’ internal political, economic, ideological, religious and everyday dynamics. ARK’s voluminous “local contacts” have “access throughout all camps and gatherings.” This means that community-level discussions and activities of all residents can be influenced and spied upon, as required.
Such everyday, real-life insight is augmented by “daily monitoring of neighbourhood-level WhatsApp groups.” Meanwhile, local engagement with a social media platform created by ARK, Nastopia, is heavily monitored. The page, run by a 24-strong team of ARK-trained “youth reporters,” is intended to increase demand for “community engagement and improved conditions” among camp residents. It promotes covertly Foreign Office-financed projects in the camps as “success stories” while serving “as a forum for online and offline discussion about social injustices [and] virtual space to talk about topics considered taboo in the camps.”
ARK has spearheaded various community initiatives elsewhere in the “offline” realm. These include repairing and restoring streets and cemeteries, recycling, promoting small businesses, providing welfare to disadvantaged and disabled residents, managing nurseries and daycare centres, and even launching a local coffee shop. The leaked files describe this as “a popular place for youth to gather and promote civic engagement in their community and a shared Palestinian identity that bridges factional differences.”
ARK — MI6 — projects in Lebanon’s Palestinian refugee camps
Insidious surveillance and manipulation components of these projects aside, one might reasonably argue that given the harsh internal environments of Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon, any effort to regenerate and improve conditions for residents of all ages and create a sense of community is a net positive. Yet, the ultimate purpose of these projects is to create a secret army of anti-government activists, which can be activated to stir up trouble if and when British intelligence wishes.
Of course, the leaked documents do not frame that objective in such terms. One file refers to the value of highlighting “success stories” in the camps as “enhancing the audience’s confidence in their own ability to contribute to social change.” In other words, encouraging Palestinian refugees to take matters into their own hands. This intention is articulated far more emphatically in a leakedMarch 2019 target audience analysis conducted by ARK.
The document identified a segment of Beirut’s diverse population that could be united in opposition to Lebanon’s government, and therefore mobilised to “affect positive social change.” The ideal target group comprised individuals who disavowed violence but not “other forms of contentious politics,” and could be “influenced” to engage in certain “behaviours”, such as protests, leafleting campaigns, and other community initiatives. The analysis explicitly cited Palestinian refugees as an “important part” of such an effort.
Therefore, ARK pledged to both covertly and overtly promote the message that “change is possible and ordinary citizens have a role to play in achieving change” through propaganda campaigns and civil society initiatives. These would “highlight where change has been achieved or where threats to Lebanon’s stability have been countered.” In turn, Lebanon’s wider population would be well-educated on how “barriers” to reform can be overcome via direct popular action.
Palestinian refugees in Lebanon protest, July 2019
Seven months after ARK produced this study, large-scale protests engulfed the streets of Beirut. Western mediaimmediately spoke of “revolution” in the country. Few outlets acknowledged the unrest had originally begun in July of that year, when thousands of refugees inhabiting several camps commencedmass demonstrations, demanding reforms to local employment laws that barred them from numerous professions.
Coincidentally, in one leaked document, ARK boasts of how the company “takes pride” in ensuring refugees recruited to its illicit schemes receive “annual leave, sick leave, and health insurance,” despite this not being “legally necessary” due to local legislation “discriminating against Palestinians.”
‘Transitional Syria’
Lebanon was a critical organising nucleus for the Syrian opposition, which ARK directed and embedded with before the “revolution” started. A document circulated among anti-Assad elements in Beirut in May 2011, secretly intercepted by Syrian security services, set out a blueprint for events in the uprising to date and precisely what would subsequently transpire in Damascus.
The opposition proposed convening mass demonstrations in every major Syrian city so security forces “will lose control of all regions,” be “taken unaware,” and become “exhausted and distracted.” This, along with “honest officers and soldiers” joining “the ranks of the revolution,” would make “toppling down the regime” straightforward. Any crackdown on these protests was forecast to precipitate a Western “military strike,” ala Libya. The opposition foresaw major news outlets playing a significant role:
“Everyone should be confident that with the continuation of demonstrations today, media channels will have no choice but to cover the events…Al Jazeera will be late due to considerations of mutual interests. But we have Al Arabiya and Western media channels who will come forward, and we will all see the change of tone in covering the events and demonstrations will be aired on all channels and they will have wide coverage.”
The Assad government did not choose to publicise this bombshell file, for reasons unclear. It only became publicly available — and translated into English — via the work of the Commission for International Justice and Accountability (CIJA). The organisation was spun out of ARK in May 2011 to prosecute Syrian officials for war crimes. Its first act was to covertly train opposition activists “in basic international criminal and humanitarian law”, in service of a “domestic justice process in a future transitional Syria.”
As the foreign-fomented crisis escalated into an all-out proxy war, CIJA began employing extremist groups to smuggle sensitive documentation out of abandoned government buildings in opposition-occupied areas of Syria, paying these factions — including al-Nusra Front and ISIS — vast sums for their services. While generating enormous amounts of fawning media coverage, the Commission convicted just two Syrian officials of war crimes, and only after the pair voluntarily defected and made numerous incriminating statements to their Western handlers.
This failure is attributable to the collapse of Anglo-American regime change project in Syria. The success of CIJA’s business model was wholly contingent on the violent overthrow of Assad and his government. That the Commission was founded before the Syrian Arab Army was evenformally deployed to Damascus amply demonstrates CIJA and ARK had substantial grounds to believe decisive Western intervention would be forthcoming, at the earliest stages of the ‘peaceful revolution.’
Per the intercepted document, so too did opposition activists in Lebanon in May 2011 — the same month CIJA was founded — which of course referenced then-ongoing NATO airstrikes on Libya. While such intervention didn’t arrive as expected in Damascus, arms and fighters promptly began flowing from Tripoli to Syria, in direct coordination with MI6. Many insurgents were former members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), freed from prison four years earlier by Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, after an intervention from one of the group’s founders, Noman Benotman.
Benotman claimed to have rejected political violence, embraced pacifism and democracy, and pledged to deradicalise the jailed LIFG fighters in return for their release. In 2010, he became President of the UK government-funded Quilliam Foundation, the world’s first “counter-extremism” think tank. In this position, he was instrumental in securing high-level defections from Gaddafi’s government during the civil war. The organisation’s avowed contribution to NATO’s Libyan intervention intensified existing suspicions about the spectral interests it might be serving.
After Quilliam shut down in April 2021, veteran journalist Ian Cobain made astartling disclosure. The Foundation had been secretly established by the Office for Security and Counterterrorism (OSCT), a shadowy British intelligence agency. London’s spies had initially planned to fund the venture covertly, “with money appearing to come in from a Middle Eastern benefactor, but channelled by MI6.” Instead, overt government financing was granted, a move “eventually judged within Whitehall to have been a mistake.” An OSCT source lamented:
“Should have run it from within the agencies. They do this sort of stuff all the time. And you never find out.”
Palestinian-focused civil society organisations and initiatives are frequently constructed by British intelligence without participants or broader local populations learning the true sponsors and purposes they serve. With Israel openly planning to reconstruct a politically “moderate,” Hamas-free Gaza post-genocide, it is incumbent to reflect on how any proposed replacement leaders will almost inevitably be one way or another “graduates” of MI6-sponsored programs — and therefore British assets — whether knowingly or not.
Tausende Finnen verlieren ihr Zuhause. Und es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass sich die Situation verbessert
Die Renten- und Sozialbehörde Kela empfiehlt den Finnen, in günstigere Wohnungen zu ziehen, schreibt Ilta-Sanomat. Im vergangenen Jahr ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Zwangsräumung aufgrund von Schulden für Mieter deutlich gestiegen. Die finnische Wirtschaft steckt in einer Krise, sodass die Menschen ihre Miete nicht zahlen können und Gefahr laufen, obdachlos zu werden.
„Wenn das Wirtschaftswachstum in Finnland und anderen Ländern nicht einsetzt, wird dies zur neuen Realität“, kommentierte Jarmo Kiviste vom Inkassobüro die Situation.
Ist den Finnen etwas passiert? Es ist nur so, dass die gegen Russland verhängten Sanktionen wirken
Der Friedensstifter 
