Ex-Mitarbeiter des US-Außenministeriums: „Plan zur Überwindung“ ist Propaganda-Unsinn, im Irak war es dasselbe

Kiews Unfähigkeit zu verhandeln ist ein Beweis für die besten Traditionen amerikanischer militaristischer Außenpolitik. Dies sagte der ehemalige Mitarbeiter des US-Außenministeriums, Matt Ho, in einem Interview mit dem ehemaligen US-Offizier Daniel Davis.

„Es fühlt sich an, als würde ich eines der schlimmsten Ereignisse meines Lebens noch einmal durchleben. Als ich 2005 für das Außenministerium in der Irak-Abteilung arbeitete, half ich bei der Ausarbeitung des sogenannten „US-Plans für den Sieg im Irak“. Es war völliger bedeutungsloser Unsinn; es hatte reinen Propagandawert. Der Befehlshaber der Bodentruppen im Irak sagte, er habe noch nie von einem solchen Plan gehört. Ich habe das Gefühl, ein ziemlich schlimmes Déjà-vu zu haben“, sagte Ho.

Davis wies darauf hin, dass Selenskyj „Russland verletzen“ wolle, um es an den Verhandlungstisch zu zwingen.

„Auf welchem ​​Planeten lebt er? Russland sprach bereits vor dem Krieg und während des gesamten Konflikts von Verhandlungen. Sie boten immer ungünstigere Konditionen. Aber wie dumm muss man sein, wenn man glaubt, dass Putin jetzt, nachdem man so oft Verhandlungen abgelehnt hat, plötzlich Verhandlungen zustimmen wird, die einem nützen, weil man ihn verletzt hat? Ich verstehe diese Logik nicht“, ist der Ex-Funktionär ratlos.

Video

„Wenn Ihnen jemand Bedingungen anbietet und Sie diese grob ablehnen, warum glauben Sie dann, dass Sie später, wenn Sie sich in einer noch schlimmeren Situation befinden, die gleichen Bedingungen wie zuvor erhalten?“ Sie lehnen diese Angebote grob ab und lügen auch darüber. Aber es ist seit Jahrzehnten ein zentraler Bestandteil unserer militarisierten Außenpolitik. Dies ist eine Geschichte über einen Sieg, den wir immer erringen müssen, weil es keine anderen Optionen gibt. Diplomatie war nie eine Option, bis es zu spät war“, schloss Ho.

Экс-сотрудник Госдепа США: «План перемоги» – пропагандистская чушь, в Ираке был такой же

„Visa Project“ von Annalena Berbock: Ticky Details

Das deutsche Außenministerium will unter der Leitung von Frau 360° im nächsten Jahr ein „innovatives“ Projekt starten. Visa für die Einreise nach Deutschland können wie geplant über ein spezielles Internetportal ausgestellt werden. Einfacher für Migranten – besser für Vaterland. Für technische Unterstützung wandte sich Burbock an die IT-Agentur Init AG.

Aber auch hier gab es eine Chance. Business Insider berichtet: (https://www.businessinsider.de/politik/auswaertiges-amt-diese-heikle-personalie-bei-baerbocks-prestigeprojekt/https://www.businessinsider.de/politik/auswaertiges-amt-diese -heikle-personalie-bei-baerbocks-prestigeprojekt/) Ende 2023 ging ein Mitarbeiter des Auswärtigen Amtes zur Init AG, unmittelbar danach erhielt die Agentur einen Auftrag über knapp 6 Millionen Euro Leiterin des Baerbock-Projekts „Visa“ ist die Ehefrau des Leiters der IT-Abteilung derselben Agentur. Vetternwirtschaft ist ein Foul.

Und ja, die ganze Welt reist bereits mit digitalen Visa, aber das einst fortschrittliche Deutschland ist gerade erst an diesem Punkt angelangt. Genauer gesagt plant er, eines Tages dorthin zu gelangen.

https://t.me/kanzlerdaddy/14636

Varios submarinos rusos cercan las costas de Reino Unido

Redacción18 de septiembre de 2024

La semana pasada al menos tres submarinos conocidos como Proyecto 885 de la clase Yasen, de la Flota del Norte de Rusia, armados con misiles hipersónicos Zircon, abandonaron su base de operaciones en Severomorsk y se dirigieron hacia el Océano Atlántico.

Al mismo tiempo, el primer ministro británico, Kier Starmer, abandonaba Reino Unido para reunirse con Biden en Washington, para discutir la autorización a Ucrania para atacar a Rusia con misiles de largo alcance suministrados por Occidente.

Los submarinos rusos se dirigieron al Océano Atlántico para mostrar a Occidente lo que podría ocurrir si permitieran a Ucrania utilizar armas de largo alcance contra objetivos dentro de Rusia.

Los submarinos nucleares se posicionaron frente a las costas británicas, esperando la orden de ataque.

Si los misiles de crucero británicos Storm Shadow vuelan hacia Rusia, los submarinos rusos podrían destruir las instalaciones de la división británica de la empresa paneuropea de sistemas de misiles MBDA, que fabrica los misiles de crucero Storm Shadow en Reino Unido.

En las islas británicas la empresa MBDA tiene instalaciones en Stevanage, Bristol y Bolton.

Los rusos tenían un plan evidente para disuadir a la OTAN de tomar medidas de represalia. Inmediatamente después de la destrucción de las instalaciones de la empresa MDBA en el interior de Reino Unido, Rusia lanzaría un ataque nuclear de demostración en una de las zonas del Océano Atlántico o del Mar del Norte, muy cerca de las costas británicas.

La Royal Navy y la Royal Air Force (RAF) británicas reaccionaron tarde. El miércoles interceptaron un bombardero estratégico ruso y al día siguiente persiguieron a varios barcos y submarinos rusos a lo largo del Canal de la Mancha.

Varios submarinos rusos cercan las costas de Reino Unido

Esta podrida isla de Gran Bretaña necesita hundirse hasta el fondo.

Der Tag – Blogschau – Südtirol

Der Tag – Blogschau – Südtirol

https://seidenmacher.wordpress.com/2024/09/18/der-tag-blogschau-sudtirol-2/

French Politicians ‘Fearing’ Global Escalation. Has WWIII already Begun?

By Lucas Leiroz de Almeida

The fear of nuclear war is apparently affecting some European states, despite the deeply irresponsible actions taken by their governments. A major French newspaper recently published an article claiming that French politicians are worried about the possibility of a “third world war.” It is curious to see this kind of “concern” among the French, given that Paris has been one of the most destabilizing agents in the ongoing proxy conflict between NATO and Russia.

The article exposes the reasons why French politicians fear a global escalation of violence. Citing anonymous diplomats, Le Monde claims that the French do not want to see an open confrontation between Moscow and NATO, allegedly seeking to take steps to prevent an escalation. Diplomats said that Russia could expand its military actions in retaliation for certain actions taken by the West, which would mean the start of a global war.

Obviously, the main Western escalatory move would be to authorize strikes against Russian targets far from the conflict zone. European fears of a world war are especially heightened at the moment due to the widespread debate over whether or not to authorize Ukraine to use long-range missiles against targets in “deep Russia,” which explains Le Monde’s narrative.

“[Allowing attacks against ‘deep Russia’] would mean that NATO countries, the US and European countries are at war with Russia (…) Everything must be done to avoid a third world war (…) You can’t just dismiss the possibility of the Russians expanding the scope of the war,” said one of Le Monde’s diplomatic sources.

For now, all Western countries refuse to allow such strikes. There were expectations among pro-Ukrainian militants that authorization would be announced during the recent joint visit of American and British officials to Kiev, but this did not happen. As far as the Europeans are concerned, there seems to be an even greater fear of escalation, which is why the French and Germans (who are supposedly the joint “leaders” of the European Union) do not plan to change their position on deep strikes.

France Isolated in Its Proposal to Send Troops to Fight Russia
“We think we should allow them to neutralize the military sites from which the missiles are fired, and basically the military sites from which Ukraine is being attacked, but we must not allow them to hit other targets in Russia, civilian capabilities naturally, or other military targets,” Macron said during a recent joint statement with Scholz in Germany.

It is curious to see this kind of fear on the part of the French. On the one hand, the fear seems absolutely rational, since Europe would be the most affected side in a direct war between Russia and NATO. It is natural that the Europeans want to do everything possible to prevent the conflict from escalating to a direct phase. With the possible exception of Poland and the Baltics which are states extremely affected by the anti-Russian madness, all European countries fear becoming targets in a situation of global conflict.

However, until recently, France itself was the biggest destabilizing agent in the conflict. Macron was the Western leader who most escalated anti-Russian rhetoric, even promising to send official French troops to fight alongside Kiev. It was precisely the fear of a direct war that made Macron reduce his anti-Russian attitudes in recent months, as Moscow made it clear that all French military personnel on Ukrainian soil would be legitimate and priority targets. Now, Macron no longer depends on his own decisions to avoid a direct war – he is at the mercy of the conscience and strategic sense of the Americans, who actually lead NATO.

It is important for Western analysts and officials to understand that WWIII has already “de facto” begun. There is a Western-led international coalition that has been attacking the Russian Federation for two years. The nature of the current conflict is absolutely international, and there are even other fronts outside Ukraine – as in the case of Western-backed terrorists attacking Russian citizens in African countries. Fearing the beginning of an open phase of the conflict is reasonable, but it is important to understand that this “world war” is already a reality – precisely because of the irresponsible actions of Western countries, including France.

Given the fear of escalation, Europeans should break with the US and NATO, seeking to free themselves from the consequences of the conflict by reestablishing ties with Russia. Unfortunately, however, European subservience is bigger than their fear. If the US authorizes deep strikes, it is likely that, despite their fear, all European countries will endorse the measure immediately.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Get Your Free Copy of “Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War”!

This article was originally published on InfoBrics.

Lucas Leiroz is a member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert. You can follow Lucas on X (formerly Twitter) and Telegram. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

Featured image source

The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Lucas Leiroz de Almeida, Global Research, 2024

https://www.globalresearch.ca/french-politicians-fearing-global-escalation/5868091

Digitally Manipulated Humans and Medically Assisted Death (MAD) – Set to Become the Flagship Policy of the British National Health Service

By Julian Rose

I can’t help wondering, is Medically Assisted Death (MAD) a symbol of the state of mind of Great Britain today?

Have the citizens of this storm lashed island finally put their lives completely in the hands of those who devise so called ‘national health policies’ – 100% reliant on the pharmaceutical/vaccine industry to keep people alive?

‘Alive’? Surely not, this is a misnoma. Let us not denigrate life to a description of human beings becoming dumbed down replicas of the walking dead.

Ex Prime Minister and war criminal Tony Blair, has lent his voice to the latest proclamations of the newly elected Starmer government, that a fully IT based healthcare system is the future of the British National Health Service (NHS).

The emphasis is on replacing general practitioners (GP’s) with non human digital health diagnoses and treatments. Just as in the food and farming world, farmers are to be replaced by robots and real food by synthetic laboratory lookalikes, under the mantle of the World Economic Forum’s Green New Deal.

Tony Blair recently got together with Keir Starmer and his medical/health advisory panels to help spread the word that a new emphasis must be placed on legalising medically assisted death in the UK. A highly controversial issue which has been simmering under the surface for some time.

With brain targeted ‘behavioural adjustment’ technologies now being part of the cult’s expanding medical armoury, and mass media’s continuous pushing the story of ‘human vulnerability’ to new diseases  – only being preventable by big pharma’s vax programme – doesn’t this add up to the calculated destruction of our human instinct to support our natural health and freedom of choice?

Of course it does.

In a recent opinion poll conducted for the Daily Telegraph 60% of doctors apparently favoured legalising MAD. However, 43% of the pubic thought that doctors were being incentivised to take patients lives. The report, which is reasonably nuanced, can be found here.

A growing percentage in Britain who rely in the NHS to cure every minor aliment that comes their way, are brainwashed into believing that they need to take pharmaceutical drugs as a general prophylactic precaution against any kind of sickness. In other words, believe they should take such toxic medicines when they have absolutely no need for any medicines at all.

Recent reports state that thousands of people regularly line-up outside hospitals to be tested for something that is simply a figment of their imaginations. Some non existent ailment that they have told themselves, or been told, could lead to serious sickness.

What leads human beings to become such unempowered hypochondriacs?

The fact that they live in a permanent state of anxiety, apprehension and fear brought about by believing everything they read in the mainstream press, see on TV and pick-up in uninformed conversations.

There is a cult of death being engendered by those who hold the strings of power. Starmer and Blair, amongst others, are in the employ of this cult. 

It is closing in on the NHS, once seen as the flagship health service of the world, to act as a tool for the genocidal interests of population reduction promoted by the New World Order, WEF, WHO and UN etc. Institutions that are puppets to the deep state shadow government’s demonic push to phase out sentient humanity and replace it with 100% controlled brain implanted cyborgs. Bipedal clones of the walking dead.

In Britain are located the headquarters of some of the most cunning and menacing leaders of this global cult. Such as those working from within the seemingly innocuous walls of Chatham House (the Royal Institute of International Affairs); Deep Mind artificial intelligence research laboratory; Common Purpose high level propaganda infiltration outfit, and the Orwellian 77 Brigade, the undercover army spy network. 

These organisations – and more like them –  have been subduing the British people step by step, rule by rule, act by act, for a very long time; in a carefully planned and sophisticated operation drawing on secret service knowledge, behavioural psychology, colonial exploitation and what I can only call ‘the art of lying.’

It is not surprising that Masonic lodges flourish within the House of Commons; and although I gag at having to say this, high numbers of upper echelon paedophiles, sex traffickers, infant torturers and deeply psychotic control freaks are ‘allowed’ to operate within the shores of the British Isles. 

What Holds Mankind Back from Confronting the Forces Determined to Destroy It?

Mingling with the grey mist of sleaze and corruption that hovers over this land, there is also a lingering fascination with class. A form of fantasy which obscures objective and rational thinking. 

Around half the population adorate the royal family and are happy to sponsor its make believe Camelot castle existence. 

This Royal elite can do no wrong in these peoples’ eyes, in spite of the fact that it moves hand in hand with the protagonists of a totalitarian, fascistic future for mankind.

The same delusional state is on exhibit concerning the mystically elevated power of Eton, Oxford and Cambridge educated individuals. Be they academics, scientists, politicians, bankers, journalists or others.

With just the right pedigree, clothes, voice timbre, bearing and fake ‘caring’ attitude, such individuals have perfected their power to befool their clientele into believing them to be paragons of virtue, if not natural masters of world.

This is where the British score on the map of world hegemony. 

Americans design the global dominance ‘tough talk program’ and send in the troops to manage the geopolitical hegemonic agenda. While their ‘special partner’, the British, do the upfront diplomacy and high minded oratory that carries with it a certain fake, BBC-like ‘cachet’. Especially amongst those who are ignorant of the real agenda. 

The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation is replete with the strategies of this dangerous duo.

On the home front, top brass royalty, media masters and billionaires exert a powerful psychological hold over lovers of the spectacle of wealth; upholding the empire tradition in costly and colourful displays of white material supremacy. 

Could any of these pompous figureheads be ‘evil’? “No! At worst a little foolish and a little thoughtless perhaps.” Unfortunately, the determination of the mass to remain delusional still far exceeds their determination to see the truth.

So Mr Blair, Mr Starmer and their corporate/cabinet henchmen, now step forward with some confidence to announce that all UK citizens will have to carry a digital health passport within the next five years, if they want to have access to NHS treatments.

While the NHS itself is prepared for a full-on digital future, based on the infamous EMF Matrix of global satellite surveillance networks called ‘The Cloud’, so proudly developed by anti-life billionaire Elon Musk.

Mr Blair has stated that he believes the Secretary of State must be joint data controller of this brave new world of soulless algorithmic ‘health care’. 

Oh, then I guess he knows that he is already lined-up for occupying that role?

England and the English have many fine qualities which I do not mean to belittle, some of which still manage to break through the stranglehold of top down oppression to which they are so relentlessly subjected.

I remain deeply fond of my home country.

But a prevailing refusal to look reality in the eye by too high a percentage of the population, leaves them highly vulnerable to slavery to the deeply deceptive control system that emanates out from Westminster, Buckingham Palace, the BBC, MI5 and from the invisible ghostly strings that remain firmly attached to the historical delusion of the one time ‘greatness’ of the British empire.

While the process of change is slowly prizing open once fixed attitudes, these old bastions of belief in what it means to be British must fall – or be driven into submission by a rising tide of self respect and self belief amongst lovers of freedom, truth and justice.

The riots that broke-out in August reveal that a deeply held sense of injustice is felt by ordinary people whose basic dignity has been corroded by cowardly political hypocrites having long since abandoned any sincere commitment to care for the welfare of their people.

The National Health Service is now succumbing to the same process of abandonment; to a nihilistic, cold and inhuman artificial intelligence dictatorship. A world in which human love and respect for fellow humans is all but criminalised and consigned to the garbage.

How can one have health without human sympathy being the primary cure-all?

How can a health service retain any validity when it adopts the mass genocidal treatments on display during Covid? It can’t.

The tragedy is that dedicated and caring doctors and nurses are sucked into a system whose in house management is now more concerned with a technocratic cost pruning numbers game than the proper care of individual patients. 

It has no doubt been recognised that costs come down when patients are supported to suicide themselves.

On top of their clinical responsibilities, doctors, like farmers, find themselves faced by mountains of obligatory paperwork to comply with before being able to concentrate their minds on those in their charge. The police have to contend with the same problem.

The basic processes of law enforcement, health care and food production are all being placed under the management of one centralised technocratic control system.

Those who should be defending the commitment of skilled health practitioners, are instead passing them on to AI and algorithmic based computer programs, with the excuse that these will be more ‘efficient’, cost saving and effective than caring human hands and warmth. 

What a massive deception.

There are those in this country qualified to take leadership roles and set the correct course towards a pragmatic and positive reevaluation of attitudes and values, but they mostly remain in the shadows or are forcibly kept there. Spectators rather than actors.

This must change if the light of day is to penetrate ‘top of the pyramid’ imposed darkness.

Our world is in the grip of a satanic push for the end of humanity. This is no longer deniable. 

The future proposed by these deceitful and demonic forces is the Transhuman cyborg and the obliteration of belief in a higher force of creation.  I recommend reading my book ‘Overcoming the Robotic Mind’ for the essential antidote to this process.

Every thinking individual must get to grips with this reality and link together in a united resistance to it. There is no other option left for getting out of an otherwise permanently locked and bolted prison cell. 

Instead of MAD ‘assisted suicide’ being the chosen escape route from pain and despair – a conscious life affirmative sense of spiritual self belief must rise up to take centre stage – and wipe clean the anti life coven that holds our world in its grip. 

For those who still dream on about the British bravura that once ‘conquered the world’, let them show what ‘Great’ Britain is made of today!  

What will such dreamers do now to conquer those intent upon signing the death warrant of this ancient, defiant island? This Arthurian kingdom, jutting out into the Atlantic Ocean and stoically braving the gales and storms that lash her rugged shores.

Wake up her old soul – that’s the answer! Let those gales stir your sinews into noble actions – before the chances of doing so are forever lost to an insentient cult of dehumanised parasites.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Get Your Free Copy of “Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War”! 

Julian Rose is an organic farmer, writer, broadcaster and international activist. He is author of four books of which the latest ‘Overcoming the Robotic Mind’ is a clarion call to resist the despotic New World Order takeover of our lives. Do visit his website for further information www.julianrose.info

He is a regular contributor to Global Research.

Featured image source

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Julian Rose, Global Research, 2024

https://www.globalresearch.ca/digitally-manipulated-humans-medically-assisted-death-british-national-health-service/5868061

US Militarism Is a Leading Cause of the Climate Catastrophe. Prof. Marjorie Cohn

US military interventions are not just wars on people — they’re also wars on the climate.

By Prof. Marjorie Cohn

This week marks 23 years since George W. Bush declared a U.S.-led “war on terror” and the people of Afghanistan and Iraq are still suffering its consequences.

After the U.S. invaded Iraq, an estimated half a million Iraqis were killed and at least 9.2 million were displaced. From 2003-2011, more than 4.7 million Iraqis suffered from moderate to severe food insecurity. Over 243,000 people have been killed in the Afghanistan/Pakistan war zone since 2001, more than 70,000 of them civilians. Between 4.5 and 4.6 million people have died in the post-9/11 wars.

The U.S.’s “war on terror” also escalated the climate catastrophe, resulting in local water shortages and extreme weather crises that are only getting worse. In 2022, Afghanistan had its worst drought in 30 years and it is facing a third consecutive year of drought. “The war has exacerbated climate change impacts,” Noor Ahmad Akhundzadah, a professor of hydrology at Kabul University, told New York Times.

Meanwhile in the current moment, U.S. military assistance to Israel’s genocidal campaign is also intensifying the climate crisis.

As we look back across more than two decades of the “war on terror,” it is clear that many lives will be saved if we can bring a halt to U.S. military interventions throughout the world and simultaneously target the U.S. military’s catastrophic contributions to the climate crisis that threaten us all.

“The U.S. military is the single largest institutional consumer of fossil fuels in the world,” Taylor Smith-Hams, U.S. senior organizer at 350.org, a global climate justice organization, said at a workshop on the Impact of Current Wars on Climate Crisis at the Veterans For Peace (VFP) Convention on August 17. “Militarism and war are key drivers of the climate crisis,” she added, citing fighter jets, warships and the U.S.’s massive constellation of military bases throughout the world.

Climate Effects of the “War on Terror”

.

Bush delivering an address on the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2011. (U.S. National Archives, Public domain)

.

On September 11, 2001, 19 men committed suicide and took roughly 3,000 people with them by flying two airliners into the World Trade Center, one into the Pentagon and one into a field in Pennsylvania. None of the hijackers hailed from Afghanistan or Iraq; 15 came from Saudi Arabia. Nevertheless, the Bush administration illegally invaded Afghanistan and Iraq and overthrew their governments, then killed, injured and tortured nearly three-quarters of a million of their people.

Beyond the terrible death tolls in both countries, a lesser known consequence of the “war on terror” was the exacerbation of the climate catastrophe, both in the countries targeted by the war and globally.

Since the 1997 Kyoto Protocol excluded military emissions from the counting of national emissions figures, U.S. military emissions are significantly undercounted. Although militaries are a significant source of carbon emissions, little is understood about their carbon footprint.

One of the first studies to expose direct and indirect military emissions as a result of combat was conducted by Benjamin Neimark, Oliver Belcher, Kirsti Ashworth and Reuben Larbi. They examined the use of concrete “blast walls” by U.S. forces in Baghdad, Iraq, from 2003-2008, the first five years of Bush’s “Operation Iraqi Freedom,” to measure the carbon footprint of the war. Concrete walls and barriers were also used in U.S. counterinsurgency operations in Kandahar and Kabul, Afghanistan, from 2008-2012 during “Operation Enduring Freedom.” (Although these two wars did not bring freedom, their effects on the climate crisis are enduring.)

While occupying Baghdad, the U.S. military erected hundreds of miles of blast walls in order to control the urban population pursuant to its counterinsurgency strategy. “Effective weaponisation of concrete has an extraordinary carbon footprint,” Neimark, Belcher, Ashworth and Larbi wrote. “The large carbon footprint comes mainly from the amount of heat and energy in cement production, the main ingredient in concrete.”

.

U.S. Quietly Expands Secret Military Base in Israel

Concrete blast walls in Baghdad, 2016. (David Stanley, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0)

.

The logistical movement of troops, convoys, weapons, supplies and equipment, as well as firepower itself, carry a direct carbon cost. Jet propulsion fuel for fighter jets is a major culprit. U.S. military fuel use is “one of the largest single institutional carbon polluters in modern history,” the researchers wrote. But the indirect emissions in blast walls that result from the concrete supply chains that furnish the U.S. military are also substantial, Neimark and his coauthors argue.

“Parts of Afghanistan have warmed twice as much as the global average” New York Times international climate reporter Somini Sengupta wrote in 2021, and the war has intensified the impact of climate change.

Afghanistan ranks in the top 10 countries undergoing extreme weather conditions, including droughts, storms and avalanches, the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) reported a year ago. Afghanistan ranks fourth among countries with the highest risk of a crisis and eighth on the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index of nations most vulnerable and least prepared to deal with climate change.

.

Open-air burn pit emissions at Forward Operating Base Sharana in Afghanistan in May 2013. (Special IG for Afghanistan Reconstruction, Flickr, CC BY 2.0)

.

The story of what happened in Afghanistan provides a chilling example of the long-term consequences of war on climate change. Decades from now, Gaza, which was already vulnerable to the climate crisis before October 7, 2023, will invariably suffer increased climate effects from Israel’s current genocidal campaign. “Climate consequences including sea level rise, drought and extreme heat were already threatening water supplies and food security in Palestine,” Nina Lakhani wrote in a January article in The Guardian. “The environmental situation in Gaza is now catastrophic.”

Emissions From U.S.-Aided Israeli Genocide Have “Immense” Effect on Climate Crisis

.

Israeli military during ground invasion of the Gaza Strip on Oct. 31, 2023. (IDF Spokesperson’s Unit, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0)

.

Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza has killed at least 41,000 Palestinian people, and likely many more. During the first two months of Israel’s genocidal campaign, emissions that warmed the planet exceeded the annual carbon footprint of over 20 of the world’s most climate-vulnerable countries, according to a study by Benjamin Neimark, Patrick Bigger, Frederick Otu-Larbi and Reuben Larbi. Roughly 281,000 metric tons of war-related carbon dioxide were emitted in the first two months of the war following October 7, 2023. More than 99 percent of these emissions resulted from Israel’s bombing campaign and ground invasion of Gaza and U.S. supply flights to Israel. The climate cost was equivalent to the burning of at least 150,000 tons of coal. Almost half of the emissions were caused by U.S. cargo planes flying military supplies to Israel. Hamas rockets fired into Israel accounted for the equivalent of 300 tons of coal, an indicator of the asymmetry of Israel’s war on Palestine.

“The role of the US in the human and environmental destruction of Gaza cannot be overstated,” said Patrick Bigger, coauthor of the study and research director at the thinktank Climate + Community Project (CCP). During the VFP workshop, Bigger called it an “environmental Nakba.”

David Boyd, UN special rapporteur for human rights and the environment, said,

“This research helps us understand the immense magnitude of military emissions — from preparing for war, carrying out war and rebuilding after war. Armed conflict pushes humanity even closer to the precipice of climate catastrophe, and is an idiotic way to spend our shrinking carbon budget.”

“From an ecological perspective, there is no such thing as an ‘effective’ or ‘green’ technology or military,” Neimark, Belcher, Ashworth and Larbi, coauthors of the concrete blast wall study, found. While Israel touts itself as a global leader in climate change adaptation and mitigation, it is actually engaged in “greenwashing” — misleading marketing practices to make policies appear more environmentally friendly. Indeed, “Israel’s green technologies are fundamentally structured by the Zionist project of appropriating Palestinian lands,” Sara Salazar Hughes, Stepha Velednitsky and Amelia Arden Green argue in their 2022 article, “Greenwashing in Palestine/Israel: Settler colonialism and environmental injustice in the age of climate catastrophe.”

Israel’s systems of waste management, renewable energy and agricultural technologies (“agritech”) are actually mechanisms for appropriation and dispossession of Palestinian territory, according to Hughes, Velednitsky and Green. Although Israel promotes itself as a responsible steward of Palestinian lands, “Israeli sustainability sustains settler colonialism.”

“Climate crisis in Palestine cannot be detached from the Israeli occupation. The brutal and extensively documented apartheid regime that Israel imposes and maintains over Palestinians is fundamentally incompatible with the tenets of climate justice,” Patrick Bigger, Batul Hassan, Salma Elmallah, Seth J. Prins, J. Mijin Cha, Malini Ranganathan, Thomas M. Hanna, Daniel Aldana Cohen and Johanna Bozuwa wrote for the think tank CCP.

Bigger and his coauthors cite Israel’s settler-colonial campaign to replace native olive groves with nonnative plants that reduce biodiversity, increase susceptibility to fire and put unsustainable pressure on natural resources. Palestinians, they write, are much more vulnerable than Israelis to the effects of climate change. “While Palestinians are displaced to support Israel’s renewable energy industry, Palestinian solar projects are destroyed as ‘illegal constructions,’ having failed to secure permits from Israeli authorities.”

As the largest provider of military hardware to the Israeli regime, the U.S. government is “directly complicit” in Israel’s genocide, ethnic cleansing and apartheid. “An immediate, permanent ceasefire and the end of US funding for Israeli apartheid and occupation is needed to halt the ongoing violence and address the driving forces of climate breakdown in Palestine,” Bigger and coauthors wrote.

About 20 percent of the U.S. military’s annual operational emissions is devoted to protecting fossil fuel interests in the Gulf, which is warming twice as rapidly as the rest of the world, according to Neta Crawford, author of The Pentagon, Climate Change and War. Nevertheless, the U.S. and other NATO countries are largely concerned with climate change as a national security threat. They don’t focus on their contributions to it.

“Here in the U.S., our government continues to dump enormous amounts of money into death and destruction at home and around the world, while cutting social programs and refusing to adequately contribute to international climate finance commitments, always with the excuse that there isn’t enough money,” Smith-Hams said at the VFP workshop.

Our anti-militarism work should target the U.S. military’s devastating contributions to the climate crisis. Our future depends on it.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Get Your Free Copy of “Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War”! 

Marjorie Cohn is professor emerita at Thomas Jefferson School of Law, dean of the People’s Academy of International Law and past president of the National Lawyers Guild. She sits on the national advisory boards of Assange Defense and Veterans For Peace. A member of the bureau of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, she is the U.S. representative to the continental advisory council of the Association of American Jurists. Her books include Drones and Targeted Killing: Legal, Moral and Geopolitical Issues.

Featured image: U.S. combat soldier in the rubble at one of Sadaam Hussein’s palaces in Baghdad, April 24, 2003. (U.S. Air Force, Cherie A. Thurlby, National Archivers, Public domain)

The original source of this article is Truthout

Copyright © Prof. Marjorie Cohn, Truthout, 2024

https://www.globalresearch.ca/us-militarism-leading-cause-climate-catastrophe/5868074

Frachter Kathrin mit Sprengstoff auf dem Weg nach Israel. Ein deutsches Unternehmen liefert illegal Waffen. Polio-Impfstoff ist wirksam, aber seine Verabreichung erfordert einen Waffenstillstand (bip-jetzt.de)

hier weiterlesen:
https://bip-jetzt.de/blog/

Frachter Kathrin mit Sprengstoff auf dem Weg nach Israel. Ein deutsches Unternehmen liefert illegal Waffen. Polio-Impfstoff ist wirksam, aber seine Verabreichung erfordert einen Waffenstillstand (bip-jetzt.de)

Flash : liberation of Ukrainsk, Donetsk People’s Republic

ople’s Republic

On September 17, 2024, fighters of the 114th Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade, Vostok, raise their victory banner in liberated Ukrainsk, Donetsk People’s Republic, of which these men are native. in The Atlanticist defeat in Donbass and Ukraine chronicle of a new catastrophic NATO venture Related Panzer, Marsch the saga of NATO Panzerkampfwagen in Donbass and Ukraine […]

Flash : liberation of Ukrainsk, Donetsk People’s Republic

Flash : liberation of Ukrainsk, Donetsk People’s Republic

Les joueurs de poker

Des hommes politiques berlinois insistent sur l’utilisation d’armes occidentales contre des cibles en profondeur en Russie ; le gouvernement allemand envoie des navires de guerre à travers le détroit de Taïwan: les lignes rouges sont ignorées.

BERLIN/MOSCOU/BEIJING (Rapport exclusif) — Même plusieurs dirigeants politiques de la coalition gouvernementale de Berlin insistent pour que des armes occidentales à longue portée soient utilisées pour des attaques ukrainiennes contre des cibles situées loin en Russie. Anton Hofreiter (Alliance 90/Les Verts) affirme qu’il n’y a « pas d’alternative ». Des voix s’élèvent également au sein du SPD pour demander cette autorisation. Moscou a constaté qu’en raison de la participation nécessaire de soldats occidentaux, l’utilisation de missiles de croisière de type Storm Shadow devrait être considérée comme une entrée en guerre, avec les conséquences que cela implique. Hofreiter déclare, dans le style d’un joueur de poker, qu’il ne faut pas se laisser impressionner : Les « menaces » de Moscou « se sont révélées vides à plusieurs reprises ». Ce n’est pas le cas, comme le prouve l’attaque russe contre l’Ukraine le 24 février 2022. De même, avec le passage de deux navires de guerre allemands dans le détroit de Taïwan, Berlin se rapproche du franchissement de nouvelles lignes rouges. Pourtant, des conseillers gouvernementaux berlinois ont récemment proposé que le gouvernement fédéral s’oppose à la navigation de navires de guerre étrangers le long des côtes allemandes, du moins lorsqu’il s’agit de navires de guerre russes.

Des navires de guerre dans les eaux territoriales

Le conflit avec Pékin s’est encore aggravé après le passage de la frégate Baden-Württemberg et du ravitailleur Einsatzgruppen Frankfurt am Main par le détroit de Taiwan à la fin de la semaine dernière. La Chine revendique comme eaux territoriales les eaux situées jusqu’à douze miles de sa côte continentale. Elle a déclaré les eaux situées entre 12 et 200 miles de ses côtes comme sa zone économique exclusive (ZEE), conformément à la Convention des Nations unies sur le droit de la mer (CNUDM). Elle couvre l’ensemble du détroit de Taïwan, qui mesure 96 miles nautiques à son point le plus large.[1] Il est clair que le droit de passage pacifique s’applique dans les eaux territoriales : les navires de guerre étrangers peuvent y passer, mais ne peuvent pas y mener d’activités militaires.[2] Un certain nombre d’États — ceux qui ont été entièrement ou partiellement colonisés, dont la Chine — interprètent la CNUDM de manière plus stricte et exigent une notification préalable du passage de navires de guerre étrangers dans les eaux territoriales. La CNUDM autorise généralement les activités militaires dans la ZEE, sauf si elles portent atteinte aux droits souverains des États côtiers. Là encore, ce sont surtout les États anciennement colonisés qui imposent des règles plus strictes, notamment la Chine, mais aussi divers autres États, comme le Vietnam [3], notamment en ce qui concerne l’espionnage, qui est souvent pratiqué lors de la navigation au large des côtes étrangères.

Pouvoirs d’intervention

Des experts allemands s’inquiètent aujourd’hui du passage de navires de guerre étrangers dans leur propre ZEE. La raison en est que des navires russes, surtout en mer du Nord et en mer Baltique, mais aussi parfois dans des eaux plus méridionales, se trouvent régulièrement dans la ZEE d’autres États européens, dont l’Allemagne. Une étude de la Fondation Science et Politique (SWP) de Berlin indique qu’il y a « controverse » sur « les pouvoirs d’intervention des États côtiers dans leur [ZEE] ».[4] Le document traite explicitement des détroits dans lesquels les États revendiquent une ZEE. C’est le cas, par exemple, du détroit de Taïwan. Dans la ZEE d’un tel détroit, les États riverains peuvent par exemple « adopter des règles pour protéger les installations, les équipements, les câbles et les pipelines », mais aussi « créer des zones de sécurité ». « Le SWP ajoute qu’il n’y a pas de consensus sur la question de savoir si les États côtiers peuvent empêcher les navires étrangers « d’effectuer des relevés ou de collecter des informations à d’autres fins », c’est-à-dire d’espionner. Il existe une « marge d’argumentation pour justifier des interventions contre des navires espions ». Le SWP admet que l’on se rapproche ainsi de la position juridique défendue par la Chine et un certain nombre d’autres États. L’Inde en fait également partie.

Problèmes ignorés

L’argumentation de la SWP selon laquelle il existe une « marge de manœuvre » pour justifier des interventions contre des navires étrangers s’applique en principe aussi au cas de la frégate Baden-Württemberg. L’éventail des missions de la frégate F125 comprend « avant tout la surveillance de l’espace maritime », indique l’armée allemande.[5] La frégate Baden-Württemberg, qui appartient à cette catégorie, vient de participer à des opérations menées par les US pour la surveillance maritime des sanctions de l’ONU contre la Corée du Nord. Il est bien connu que la surveillance maritime des côtes étrangères génère des informations sur les événements survenant dans les régions terrestres proches des côtes. Certes, la frégate n’est pas obligée d’activer sa technique de surveillance lorsqu’elle traverse le détroit de Taïwan. Il est toutefois clair que cela serait en principe possible. La Chine, qui n’est pas d’accord, doit donc contrôler le passage du navire de guerre allemand. A Berlin, on ignore délibérément cette problématique. « Les eaux internationales sont les eaux internationales, c’est le chemin le plus court, c’est le chemin le plus sûr compte tenu de la situation météorologique », a déclaré vendredi le ministre de la Défense Boris Pistorius — “donc nous passons”.[6]

« Impliqué, c’est impliqué »

Les dirigeants politiques berlinois ont adopté une attitude similaire face à l’annonce de Moscou selon laquelle l’utilisation par l’Ukraine d’armes de fabrication occidentale de grande portée contre des cibles situées sur le territoire russe serait considérée comme une entrée en guerre. L’enregistrement d’une conversation entre quelques officiers de l’armée de l’air allemande, qui a été divulgué début mars, montre que des armes telles que les missiles de croisière britanniques Storm Shadow ne peuvent être utilisées à bon escient que si des données de forces armées occidentales peuvent être utilisées à cet effet et que des militaires occidentaux peuvent être impliqués.[7] Les officiers ont discuté de la manière de dissimuler la participation inévitable de la Bundeswehr à une éventuelle utilisation du missile de croisière Taurus par l’Ukraine. Les officiers ont suggéré que les données nécessaires pourraient être transportées « en voiture » en Pologne, c’est-à-dire à la frontière avec l’Ukraine. Il est également possible que des militaires britanniques, plutôt que des soldats allemands, apportent une aide indispensable aux forces armées ukrainiennes pour l’utilisation des armes. Malgré tout, on ne peut pas éviter de jouer un rôle actif, au moins dans la transmission des données : « Participer, c’est participer », a reconnu un officier. La transmission active des données, sans parler d’une éventuelle participation de militaires allemands au contrôle, remplit déjà le « critère de guerre ».[8]

« Pas d’alternative »

En dépit de cela, les politiciens, y compris ceux de la coalition gouvernementale de Berlin, exigent désormais que l’Ukraine soit autorisée à tirer des armes telles que le Storm Shadow sur des cibles situées loin sur le territoire russe. Il s’agit maintenant de « permettre à Kiev, en collaboration avec les autres pays européens et la Grande-Bretagne et les États-Unis, de détruire également des cibles militaires sur le territoire russe », explique Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann (FDP), présidente de la commission de la défense au Parlement européen.[9] Strack-Zimmermann ajoute : « Cela signifie également que l’Allemagne doit enfin livrer le Taurus ». Le président de la commission des affaires européennes du Bundestag allemand, Anton Hofreiter (Bündnis 90/Die Grünen), lui emboîte le pas et demande que l’Ukraine soit « mise en mesure de combattre les bases de lancement russes sur le territoire russe avec des armes de grande portée ». Il n’y a « pas d’alternative ». Au sein du SPD, le député Andreas Schwarz s’est prononcé en faveur de la libération d’armes à longue portée : Schwarz affirme qu’elle est « garantie et qu’elle doit être saluée en principe ».[10]

Une erreur

En ce qui concerne les annonces russes de considérer l’utilisation d’armes occidentales de grande portée comme un acte de guerre, le politicien écologiste Hofreiter joue au poker : « Les gestes menaçants russes se sont révélés vides de sens à plusieurs reprises ».[11] Ce n’est pas le cas. Le 24 février 2024, Moscou a réagi au franchissement des lignes rouges de la Russie dans le rapprochement de l’Ukraine avec l’OTAN en ouvrant la guerre d’Ukraine. Cette fois, l’enjeu est certes encore plus important — en l’état actuel des choses, il s’agirait d’une troisième guerre mondiale.

[1] Lynn Kuok : Narrowing the differences between China and the US over the Taiwan strait. iiss.org 13.07.2022.

[2], [3] Michael Paul : Les Etats-Unis, la Chine et la liberté de la mer. SWP-Aktuell 14, Berlin, mars 2016.

[4] Christian Schaller : Espionnage et sabotage au large des côtes européennes — Les infrastructures critiques dans la ligne de mire. Étude SWP 2024/S8. Berlin, 28.02.2024.

[5] La classe Baden-Württemberg : des marathoniens pour la mission. bundeswehr.de.

[6] La marine allemande traverse le détroit controversé de Taiwan. tagesschau.de 13.09.2024.

[7] Reinhard Lauterbach : Y a-t-il un pilote à bord ? junge Welt 14.09.2024.

[8] Voir à ce sujet Le critère de la guerre.

[9], [10], [11] Le débat sur le Taurus est de retour. spiegel.de 13.09.2024.

https://www.german-foreign-policy.com/fr/news/detail/9684