You Can’t Arm a Genocidal State Into Moderation. So Why Does the West Keep Trying?

Western governments will never isolate and sanction Israel. The war machine will roll on until either we stop it or its lethal games blow up in all our faces

By Jonathan Cook

There are many reasons Gaza has been mostly off the radar of the western establishment media for months now, even as the enclave turns into an ever-bigger killing zone.

One is that, nearly a year into what the World Court has termed a “plausible genocide”, where Israel has kept out western journalists and killed off most Palestinian journalists, as well as driving out international aid organisations and the United Nations, there is almost no one left to tell us what is happening.

We have only snapshots of individual suffering, but not the big picture. How many Palestinians are dead? We know there are at least 40,000 killed by Israel – the deaths recorded by Palestinian officials before the health system collapsed. But how many more? Double that figure? Quadruple it? Times it by 10? The truth is, no one knows.

What about the famine in Gaza that has been raging for many, many months as Israel has systematically blocked aid into the enclave, in line with its promise last October to deny the Palestinians there food, water and power?

The International Criminal Court’s chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, has requested arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his defence minister, Yoav Gallant, because the pair’s starvation of Gaza is a crime against humanity.

But the prolonged famine is presented as a near-victimless crime. Where are the dead from this famine? They are certainly not on our TV screens or on our front pages.

The true death toll will probably never be reported, just as it wasn’t after the West’s Middle East bloodbaths in AfghanistanIraq and Libya. Western politicians have no interest in knowing the truth, and the western establishment media has no interest in discovering it.

Democracy Gutted

The news from Gaza is being actively buried for another reason. Israel’s genocide continues to be tangible, shocking proof that western capitals are not the bastions of democracy and bulwarks against barbarianism they claim to be.

Western politicians have been utterly complicit in the genocide – a fact impossible to hide from their publics. The killing could have been stopped at any point, had the Biden administration so willed it.

Ordinary people have made clear they want the slaughter to end, which is why Biden has to pretend to be “working tirelessly” to negotiate a ceasefire – a ceasefire he could impose whenever he chooses to.

Israel is entirely dependent on US military, diplomatic and financial largesse, as is only too clear from the 50,000 tonnes of weapons the Biden administration has so far shipped to Israel since last October.

But the truth is that western politics is now entirely unresponsive to popular demand. The last vestiges of democratic accountability were gutted many years ago as the West’s political systems were completely captured by powerful globe-spanning corporations.

Tens of millions of people turned out on the streets of Europe to try to halt the US and Britain’s illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003, and it made not a jot of difference.

The situation with Gaza is even worse. It is not just that, as before, no one in power is listening. Those opposing Israel’s genocide, and western complicity in it, are being utterly maligned. The millions marching against the slaughter are reported as “tens of thousands”, while being actively smeared as “antisemites”.

Western states – and their self-professed “defensive alliance”, Nato – are not there to represent the public interest. They have become chiefly vehicles for the promotion of the narrow interests of a corporate elite, whose purpose, in turn, is to siphon into private hands the profits from publicly funded, permanent wars.

Profits from Slaughter

It isn’t just arms manufacturers and the hi-tech industries, with their booming surveillance businesses, whose shares are soaring on the back of the slaughter in Gaza and Ukraine.

Bloomberg reported last month that Israeli air strikes on Gaza had turned the homes of 2.3 million Palestinians into 42m tonnes of rubble. That’s enough to fill a line of dump trucks from New York to Singapore.

It won’t be Gaza companies raking in the profits from the mammoth clean-up operation. After a 17-year blockade of the enclave by Israel, Gaza’s industrial and commercial sector barely existed even before Israel’s current wrecking spree. The beneficiaries, once again, will be western corporations.

If the “day after” ever arrives, it will be western corporations bidding to rebuild Gaza – and most likely not for the current Palestinian inhabitants. Israel wants them either dead or ethnically cleansed from the territory.

A razed, emptied Gaza will be a tabula rasa. Expensive new beachfront properties can be marketed to wealthy Israeli Jews. New industrial zones and ports will be able to export easily to Europe and North Africa.

And that’s before we consider who gets to exploit the bountiful natural gas just off Gaza’s coast, which western corporations have been greedily eyeing for the past two decades.

Excuses for Repression

Western corporations have been growing ever fatter at the same time as western publics have been required to submit to endless belt-tightening.

The UK’s new prime minister, Keir Starmer, who understands that his own political survival depends on continuing this corporate raiding of the public wealth, is busily managing Britons’ expectations.

Armed with a massive parliamentary majority, he had no message of hope or change. He told the British public last week that “things are worse than we ever imagined”. There was no reference to why they might be so bad, beyond predictable political point-scoring against the previous government.

Starmer warned of the need to “do things differently”. But the difference he offered was actually a commitment to more austerity – the signature policy of his predecessors.

And, just as Starmer’s agenda is one of no change on the domestic front, it is also one of no change on foreign policy. The endless wars will continue.

The new British government, like the old one, keeps peddling excuses to continue to sell arms to an Israeli military using them to massacre civilians.

Foreign Secretary David Lammy grovelled before Israel on 2 September as he announced he was suspending eight percent of such sales after he had been warned of their possible use in Israeli war crimes. It is apparently fine to send the other 92 percent of military contracts, including components used in Israel’s squadron of F-35 warplanes, to a regime actively engaged in genocide.

Meanwhile, the new government, like the old one, pursues with what it calls “laser focus” wider business opportunities with Israel.

In the US, Kamala Harris, shoe-horned in as the Democrats’ presidential candidate to replace Joe Biden, without a single vote cast, is sold by a compliant media as the candidate of “joy” – vapid political messaging as void of content as former President Barack Obama’s much-celebrated slogan of “hope”.

Israel-Palestine War: Don’t be Fooled. Biden Is Fully Signed Up to Genocide in Gaza

“Joy” is serving as an excuse to repress. Demonstrators outside the Democratic National Convention as it crowned Harris protested against her and Biden’s near-year-long complicity in the Gaza genocide. But they were not going to be allowed to sour the “joyful” mood inside. They were forcefully swept out of view by police.

In her first interview since being nominated, Harris promised US support for the genocide in Gaza would continue – even if, as seems quite possible, it robs her of a handful of swing states in November and ensures Donald Trump is elected president.

The ‘Antisemitism’ Formula

Both Starmer and Harris are faithful creatures of a permanent bureaucracy that was long ago captured by the West’s profit-hungry corporate war machine.

Its most favoured son is Israel, a highly militarised state – a colonial outgrowth of the West – implanted into an oil-rich Middle East like a bone stuck in the back of the throat. Israel is there to advance an openly belligerent Jewish supremacism, mirroring a western supremacism that nowadays prefers to veil its imperial ambitions.

From early on, Israel’s backers were given a perfect cover story for the crimes they sponsored against the native inhabitants of the land, the Palestinians – and one that could be adapted to justify Israel’s permanently warlike posture in the region.

In a self-serving narrative promoted by the West, the continuing threat of antisemitism required Jews to have their own militarised fortress state – a modern Pale of Settlement – as a bulwark against a future Holocaust.

Western capitals accepted one marker only of whether westerners were rehabilitated from their earlier Jew-hatred: they must agree to indulge Israel’s every military wish.

Those in the West who armed Israel and helped it expel the native Palestinians in 1948 and 1967, those who turned a blind eye as it built the region’s only nuclear arsenal, those who encouraged its wars against its neighbours, and those who lobbied for the undermining of international law in the pursuit of those wars, proved themselves to be free of the virus of Jew-hatred.

Those who opposed western imperialism and the excesses of its favourite Middle East client state, those who stood up for human rights and international law, could be dismissed and denounced as antisemites.

That well-worn formula, extraordinary as it seems, has persisted even as Israel has pursued Jewish supremacism to its logical end-point in Gaza: exterminating the population there.

Those in favour of arming a genocide are the good guys. Those opposed are the antisemites and supporters of terrorism.

Independent journalists and Palestinian solidarity activists are now being rounded up and intimidatedunder draconian anti-terrorism laws in Britain.

Social media platforms are limiting the reach of posts critical of Israel, herding opposition to the genocide into small online ghettoes.

Universities are starting to draft new rules to make being a Zionist – subscribing to Israel’s extremist political ideology – a protected characteristic, no different from being born Hispanic or Black.

The aim is to silence all Palestinian solidarity activism on campus as equivalent to racism, extinguishing any chance of a repetition of the large protests that swept US universities during the spring and summer.

Inversion of Reality

For good reason, western establishments are making it impossible to explain the roots of Israel’s genocide. They are excising the very terminology needed to begin that conversation.

Zionism is an ideology that originated centuries ago, embedded in an antisemitic Christian fundamentalism that required forcing the Jews of Europe to “return” to the Holy Land. That way, a supposed biblical prophecy would be fulfilled, bringing about an end times in which Christians alone would find redemption.

Little more than a century ago, Zionism started to make inroads into the thinking of a small European Jewish elite, who saw Christian antisemitism as a path towards the creation of a Jewish state they could rule on licence from the West.

The antisemitic Christian Zionists wanted the Jews out of Europe and ghettoised in the Holy Land – and so did the new breed of Jewish Zionists.

Theodor Herzl, the father of Jewish Zionism, precisely understood this confluence of interests when he wrote in his Diaries: “The anti-Semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies.”

To understand how and why Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, and why it is being allowed by the West,it is vital to analyse the historic role played by Zionism, and how antisemitism has been weaponised over decades to serve as the perfect cover for the dispossession, and now extermination, of the Palestinian people.

Which is precisely why, on his path to power, Starmer, Britain’s new prime minister, made sure to conflate anti-Zionism – opposition to Zionism – with antisemitism.

The corporate war machine requires of anyone it allows near the centres of power to prove that they will maintain this inversion of reality: that those who support war are the good guys, and those who oppose genocide are the antisemites.

In trying to turn reality back onto its feet, Starmer’s predecessor, Jeremy Corbyn, doomed himself to endless smears.

Now those who try to maintain – in the face of a genocide – their grasp on reality, as well as their humanity, find themselves similarly vilified.

Genocide by Proxy?

This is the hidden context for interpreting the ever-more dangerous developments unfolding around the Gaza genocide.

Israeli political and military leaders are split on where to head next.

There are those ready – having laid waste to Gaza – to do a deal on the remaining Israeli hostages, pull back somewhat and let the rest of the genocide gradually play out.

Aluf Benn, editor of Israel’s venerable Haaretz newspaper, recently set out the emerging plan for “the day after”.

Israel will split Gaza into northern and southern territories along the Netzarim corridor, and starve anyone in the north to death if they refuse to leave.

North Gaza will be settled by Jews, attracted by its “convenient topography, a sea view, and proximity to central Israel”.

South Gaza, packed with destitute, homeless and often maimed refugees deprived of housing, schools and hospitals, will be left to rot under an Israeli siege, an intensification of Israel’s policy before 7 October. The media, it is expected, will lose what little interest it already exhibits in the plight of Palestinians there.

Benn avoids mentioning what happens next. The enclave’s population will face a long, cold, wet winter with no power or sanitation. Starvation will deepen, epidemics will spread.

A genocide by proxy.

Unless, that is, neighbouring states, most especially Egypt, can be blackmailed into agreeing to become complicit in Gaza’s ethnic cleansing.

This is the view of much of the military command, expressed in defence minister Gallant’s reported “shouting match” with Netanyahu at a cabinet meeting on 30 August over the prime minister’s continuing moves to obstruct a hostage deal with Hamas.

It is also the impulse behind the huge protests in Israeli cities this week, and the calling of a general strike by the main labour union, after six hostages were brought back from Gaza dead.

Two Birds, One Stone

The question is whether Netanyahu’s government can be persuaded to stick to this “minimalist” genocide.

Impatient to complete the slaughter in Gaza, and aware that Israel is already a pariah state in the eyes of non-western states and now, increasingly, with western publics, the far right in Netanyahu’s government see only opportunity. They wish to block a ceasefire indefinitely, and use that time to expand the genocide into the larger, more prized Palestinian territory of the West Bank.

This is Israel’s version of killing two birds with one stone. It is also the only way for Netanyahu to keep his far-right coalition together and exploit his role as “wartime leader” to put off his date with the courts in his long-running corruption trial.

Last week’s large-scale attacks on major West Bank cities, with Israeli officials warning the population to be ready to flee invaded areas at short notice, are a foretaste of what is intended.

Having received no meaningful pushback from western capitals over the Gaza genocide, the Israeli right has grown more confident that the same template can be rolled out for the West Bank.

Foreign Minister Israel Katz noted that invasions of the West Bank would be handled “exactly as we deal with terror infrastructure in Gaza, including the temporary evacuation of Palestinian civilians”.

In response, a US official indicated that Washington was ready to sign up to an expansion into the West Bank of Israel’s war against the Palestinian people: “We recognise that localised evacuation orders may be necessary in certain instances to protect civilian lives during sensitive counter-terrorism operations.”

The sense of urgency has only been underscored to Israeli leaders by the World Court’s recent ruling that Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories is illegal and constitutes apartheid rule.

Rampaging through the West Bank can be justified indefinitely on the pretext of foiling an “Iranian-backed terror threat”.

And US support will only deepen if Trump wins in November. Should he manage to foreclose on Nato’s proxy war in Ukraine, the military resources expended there can be redirected towards Israel.

Israeli Pyromania

Netanyahu and his allies understand that his solution for the “Palestinian problem” risks a regional conflagration, which is why they need to drag the US deeper into the mire.

And they have multiple potential provocations up their sleeve that can further entangle Washington in neutralising a regional “axis of resistance” that stands as an obstacle to Israel’s military hegemony in the region.

Itamar Ben Gvir, the fascist minister in charge of the police, is seeking to light a match under al-Aqsa in occupied East Jerusalem. His police militias have been running protection for Jewish extremists breaking into the mosque complex to pray there. 

On 26 August, Ben Gvir stepped up his incitement by calling publicly for the first time to build a synagogue inside al-Aqsa.

But the real target is Iran and groups allied to it. Netanyahu’s pyromania has extended to a series of executions designed both to humiliate Tehran, the main sponsor of resistance, and its Hezbollah allies in Lebanon, while making negotiations to end the bloodletting in Gaza impossible.

Back in April, Israel struck Iran’s consulate in Damascus, killing 16 people. And on 31 July, it assassinated Hamas’ political leader and chief negotiator, Ismail Haniyeh, while he was being hosted in Tehran.

A day earlier, Israel killed Fuad Shukr, a Hezbollah military commander, in an attack on the Lebanese capital, Beirut.

Simmering Border

Netanyahu knew the inevitable consequences.

Yahya Sinwar, Hamas’ much less compromising military leader, has filled the void left in the group by Haniyeh’s execution. 

And both Hezbollah and Iran have even stronger grounds for launching retaliation operations against Israel that could quickly spiral into an all-out war. 

That came close to happening late last month with an exchange of heavy fire across the Lebanese border, with Israeli warplanes bombing more than 40 sites in Lebanon while Hezbollah launched more than 300 rockets and drones at military sites in Israel.

Israel’s northern border has been simmering for months.

Senior Israeli politicians have been noisily demanding that the Israeli military destroy south Lebanon and reoccupy it. In June, Israel was reported to have approved a plan for a war in Lebanon. The US envoy to Lebanon was said to have told Hezbollah that Washington “won’t be able to hold Israel back”.

The New York Times has reported soaring recruitment of Palestinians in Lebanon by armed Hamas brigades there, adding another unpredictable element to the mix.

And in a useful feedback loop for Israel, the more it can provoke Iran, the greater excuse it creates to repeat the Gaza genocide formula in the West Bank, bombing its cities and driving out its population. 

Foreign Minister Katz has been setting out precisely this thesis in English-language posts for western audiences, suggesting that Iran is smuggling weapons through Jordan into the West Bank.

He claims Tehran is “working to establish an eastern terror front against Israel through special units of the IRGC [Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps], involved in smuggling weapons, funding, and directing terror organisations”.

Western politicians and media are never going to admit that Israel is carrying out a genocide in Gaza. The moment they do, the veil of illusions fostered for decades about Israel – designed to conceal the West’s complicity in Israeli crimes – would be torn away. 

In committing a genocide, a state crosses a threshold. It cannot be armed into moderation. Nor can it be reasoned into peacemaking. It must be aggressively isolated and sanctioned. 

There is no sign western establishments are willing to do that for one very simple reason: they cannot afford to do it. 

So they will continue feeding the war machine until either we stop them or its lethal games blow up in all our faces.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Get Your Free Copy of “Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War”! 

Featured image: Israeli tank operating in Gaza (Photo: IDF)

The original source of this article is Middle East Eye

Copyright © Jonathan CookMiddle East Eye, 2024

https://www.globalresearch.ca/arm-genocidal-state-west/5867333

Is the World Walking Blindfolded Toward a Nuclear War?

By Prof Rodrigue Tremblay

“Through the release of atomic energy, our generation has brought into the world the most revolutionary force since prehistoric man’s discovery of fire. This basic power of the universe cannot be fitted into the outmoded concept of narrow nationalisms.” Statement by the Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists, presided by Albert Einstein, January 22, 1947.

“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” Albert Einstein (1879-1955), German-born theoretical physicist, (in an interview in ‘Liberal Judaism’, April-May, 1949)

“While defending our own vital interests, nuclear powers must avert those confrontations, which bring an adversary to a choice of either a humiliating retreat or a nuclear war. To adopt that kind of course in the nuclear age would be evidence only of the bankruptcy of our policy—or of a collective death-wish for the world.” John F. Kennedy (1917-1963), 35th U.S. President, 1961-1963, (in his commencement address titled “A Strategy of Peace” delivered at the American University in Washington, D.C., on Monday, June 10, 1963 

Introduction

During the fatidic year of 2024, the world’s attention was distracted, first by the on-going and expanding US-NATO provoked Ukraine war against Russia, “to weaken Russia” dixit Secretary of Defense, General Lloyd Austin, a proxy war planned a long time ago, in 1991, after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

As a matter of fact, this has been a proxy war from the start between the United States and Russia, promoted by American neocons. It is a war that officially started with the U.S. government financing the violent overthrow of the elected pro-Russian government of President Viktor Yanukovych, in February 2014.

Secondly, there is the on-going conflict between Israel and the Palestinians in Gaza, which began with an attack by Hamas in October 2023. This was followed by the killing of more than 40,000 Palestinians by the Israeli Netanyahu government. Such widespread massacre of civilians and destruction have left thousands of children orphaned, shocked genocide historians and shamed the world’s conscience. Nevertheless, the modern-day massacre of the Palestinian people seems to have no end in sight.

On the other hand, we have also witnessed this year the holding of the grandiose Paris Summer Olympics. That great peace celebration among nations was followed by a political saga in the American presidential election campaign, when the incumbent Democratic President Joe Biden was pressured to withdraw his candidacy in favor of Vice President Kamala Harris.

However, other more scary developments have been taking place in the shadow. Indeed, the New York Times revealed on Tuesday, August 20, that last March, President Joe Biden, in a dangerous display of brinkmanship, secretly approved a new coordinated American nuclear strategy. It is about a plan for simultaneous nuclear confrontations of the United States with Russia, China and North Korea.

That there exists such a plan is not very reassuring, considering that the United States was the first and only country to have dropped nuclear bombs on cities, those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in August 1945, resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths.

That a world nuclear war in this day and age could be viewed as possible, even likely, is mind-boggling. As the quote above from President John F. Kennedy in his June 1963 speech illustrates, “to adopt that kind of course in the  nuclear age would be evidence only of the bankruptcy or our policy—or of a collective death-wish for the world.”

The Dire Consequences of Countries Preparing for a Nuclear War

Nuclear spending programs in the three largest nuclear powers—China, Russia, and the United States—threaten to trigger a three-way nuclear arms race, as the world’s arms control architecture collapses. Russia and China are expanding their nuclear capabilities, and pressure mounts in Washington, especially among supporters of the U.S. military-industrial complex (MIC), for the United States to respond in kind.

The lack of trust and willingness to control and limit the production of nuclear weapons may herald a new era of development of new nuclear weapons, including the deployment of offensive intercontinental-range nuclear weapons. This means that the main nuclear powers could expand the development of new nuclear weapons just as geopolitical tensions keep increasing. This is bound to place the security of all nations in jeopardy.

Humanity’s Doomsday Clock Is Getting Closer and Closer to Midnight

According to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, its metaphor or symbol of the Doomsday Clock, created in 1947, was set to 90 seconds to midnight in January 2023. It was kept at that high point in January 2024, because humanity continues to face a high level of danger in three main areas: the greatest risk of nuclear warfare, the ongoing negative consequences of climate change and the new threat of Artificial Intelligence.

In July of 1991, at the end of the Cold War, the United States (Pres. George H. W. Bush) and the Soviet Union/Russia (Pres. Mikail S. Gorbatchev) signed the bilateral Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I), designed to promote nuclear disarmament. 

It mandated both sides to reduce their strategic offensive nuclear weapons arsenals. The Atomic Scientists’ Doomsday Clock was then set at 17 minutes to midnight. (N.B.: START I was a success. It had the effect of removing about 80% of all strategic nuclear weapons then in existence, when its final implementation was completed, in late 2001.)

Today, however, with the world thrown into a new Cold War II, with heightened geopolitical tensions between US-EU-NATO, on one side and Russia-China-North Korea-Iran, on the other, the risks of a major global nuclear cataclysm are very high.

Since START I, Most Arms Control Agreements Have Failed

After the success of the START I treaty, there were two additional treaties signed between the U.S. and Russia to further reduce the stocks of nuclear armaments. Both failed.

First, in January 1993, American president George H. W. Bush and Russian president Boris Yeltsin signed a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty called START II, to expand what the START I treaty had accomplished. However, this new treaty never entered into effect.

This is because the George W. Bush administration decided, in June 2002, to withdraw from the Anti-ballistic Missile treaty (ABM) that had been in existence between the U.S. and the USSR since 1972, and which was one of the conditions for START II to go ahead.

Many observers considered the American withdrawal of the ABM treaty as the first step toward abandoning effective legal constraints on nuclear proliferation.

Second, President Barack Obama did attempt to revive the mutual reduction of offensive nuclear weapons for ensuring a safer world, when he signed a New START treaty, in April 2010, with then President Dmitry Medvedev of the Russian Federation. However, there was mounting skepticism over nuclear arms reductions among some U.S. Republican senators and from Washington DC think tanks, such as the Heritage Foundation.

The New START treaty was intended to last ten years, with an option to renew it for up to five years upon the agreement of both parties.

However, on February 2017, then President Donald Trump told Russian president Vladimir Putin that he was withdrawing from the New START treaty, expressing the view that it was too favorable to Russia and that this was a “bad deal negotiated by the Obama administration.”

All attempts between Trump and Putin to draft a replacement to the New START treaty before it expired in 2021 failed. Russia went as far as accusing the Trump administration of “deliberately and intentionally” dismantling international arms control agreements and referred to its “counterproductive and openly aggressive” approach in talks.

Nevertheless, in January 2001, the newly-elected Biden administration did accept a Russian proposal to extend the New START treaty of nuclear arms reduction for five years, i.e. until 2026.

That was the last attempt by the United States and Russia to increase their mutual nuclear safety through bilateral negotiations.

An Historical Precedent

Political relations between the United States and Russia have become increasingly strained, especially after Russia invaded neighboring Ukraine in February 2022.

The Russian government evoked two main reasons for its move: to protect the Ukrainian russophone minority from Kiev’s exactions, and to prevent the latter country from joining NATO, which would mean the deployment of American nuclear-armed missiles at Russia’s border.

This war has resulted in tremendous amounts of destruction, sufferings and numerous deaths. It is a war that could have been avoided with a minimum of good faith, diplomacy and a few concessions.

The conflict is reminiscent of the 1962 Cuban missile crisis. The Soviet Union had placed nuclear-armed missiles in Cuba, 90 miles from the U.S. coastline, in a response to American deployments of nuclear-armed missiles in Italy and Turkey. A compromise was eventually reached between President Kennedy and President Khrushchev: the Soviet government would dismantle their offensive weapons in Cuba and the U.S. government agreed, secretly, to dismantle all of the offensive weapons it had deployed in Turkey.

Conclusions

The world has increasingly become a more chaotic and dangerous place. This has a lot to do with the current lack of nuclear deterrence agreements between major nuclear powers. If one nuclear country were to launch an attack with a nuclear weapon in such a climate of mistrust, this could create an existential threat for hundreds of millions of inhabitants of the Planet.

A devastating nuclear war would not only have tragic human consequences, but also economic ones. It would be a huge waste of resources, but it could also create a nuclear winter with damaging fallouts on crops leading to famine, besides being a major source of air pollution.

A nuclear war could profit the military nuclear industry in some countries, but it would create chaos in the global economy, causing inflation in the countries involved and creating stagflation in the private sector of national economies.

If leaders of nations with nuclear weapons continue to trivialize the threat of a full-scale nuclear war and to fantasize the demential idea that they can ‘win’ a nuclear war, the world may be heading straight towards an existential catastrophe.

Therefore, it is incumbent upon all, leaders and citizens, to work towards the abolition of wars, which do not advance humanity, but rather set it back.

*

Click the share button below to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.

Get Your Free Copy of “Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War”! 

This article was originally published on the author’s blogsite, Dr. Rodrigue Tremblay.

International economist Dr. Rodrigue Tremblay is the author of the book about morals “The code for Global Ethics, Ten Humanist Principles” of the book about geopolitics “The New American Empire“, and the recent book, in French, “La régression tranquille du Québec, 1980-2018“. He was Minister of Trade and Industry (1976-79) in the Lévesque government. He holds a Ph.D. in international finance from Stanford University. Please visit Dr Tremblay’s site or email to a friend here.

Prof. Rodrigue Tremblay is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG).

Featured image source


The Code for Global Ethics: Ten Humanist Principles

by Rodrigue Tremblay, Preface by Paul Kurtz

Publisher: ‎ Prometheus (April 27, 2010)

Hardcover: ‎ 300 pages

ISBN-10: ‎ 1616141727

ISBN-13: ‎ 978-1616141721

Humanists have long contended that morality is a strictly human concern and should be independent of religious creeds and dogma. This principle was clearly articulated in the two Humanist Manifestos issued in the mid-twentieth century and in Humanist Manifesto 2000, which appeared at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Now this code for global ethics further elaborates ten humanist principles designed for a world community that is growing ever closer together. In the face of the obvious challenges to international stability-from nuclear proliferation, environmental degradation, economic turmoil, and reactionary and sometimes violent religious movements-a code based on the “natural dignity and inherent worth of all human beings” is needed more than ever. In separate chapters the author delves into the issues surrounding these ten humanist principles: preserving individual dignity and equality, respecting life and property, tolerance, sharing, preventing domination of others, eliminating superstition, conserving the natural environment, resolving differences cooperatively without resort to violence or war, political and economic democracy, and providing for universal education. This forward-looking, optimistic, and eminently reasonable discussion of humanist ideals makes an important contribution to laying the foundations for a just and peaceable global community.

Click here to purchase.

The original source of this article is Global Research

Copyright © Prof Rodrigue Tremblay, Global Research, 2024

https://www.globalresearch.ca/world-blindfolded-nuclear-war/5867335

Fritz Selbmann: Bekenntnis zur aktiven Bewältigung des Lebens. (Ein Interview)

In dem Band „Auskünfte – Werkstattgespräche mit DDR-Autoren“ erschien 1976, ein Jahr nach dem Tode Fritz Selbmanns, ein bemerkenswertes Interview, in dem der Schriftsteller seine Beweggründe, sich für den Aufbau des Sozialismus einzusetzen, ausführlich darlegt. Für Fritz Selbstmann war der Aufbau des Sozialismus in der DDR einst das Selbstverständlichste von der Welt, das Beste, was dem deutschen Volke jemals passieren konnte. Von den heutigen Machthabern allerdings wird die DDR in dunkelsten Farben gezeichnet. Doch nichts kann darüber hinwegtäuschen, daß die menschenverachtende Politik des Imperialismus, die Lüge und der Betrug, mit denen die Menschen heute entpolitisiert und entmündigt werden, nur ein vorübergehender Zustand sein kann. Wenn die Menschheit überleben will, dann muß sie den Kapitalismus mit seiner Wurzel, dem Privateigentum an Produktionsmitteln, ein- für allemal beseitigen. Die bisherigen Machthaber und ihre diensteifrigsten Lakaien müssen enteignet und ihrer gerechten Strafe zugeführt werden…

Vieles können wir aus dem gewinnen, was uns der Kommunist und Schriftsteller aus seinem Leben berichtet. Fritz Selbmann, der Bergarbeiter, der politische Aktivist und schließlich Zeitgenosse des sozialistischen Aufbaus in der DDR vermittelt uns wertvolle Erfahrungen, wie man die Zeit des Faschismus übersteht, sich neue Ziele setzt und aktiv dazu beiträgt, die alten und gewohnten, egoistischen Denkweisen des Kapitalismus zu überwinden…

Fritz_SelbmannFritz Selbmann hatte ein bewegtes Leben hinter sich. Bereits im jungen Alter von 17 Jahren arbeitete er unter Tage als Bergmann, war Soldat im 1. Weltkrieg, 1918 Mitglied eines Arbeiter- und Soldatenrats, wurde Mitglied der KPD, kam 1924 wegen politischer Tätigkeit für 10 Monate ins Gefängnis, gehörte als Reichstagsabgeordneter der KPD zu den Teilnehmern der letzten illegalen Versammlung des ZK der KPD in Ziegenhals, wurde 1933 von den Nazis verhaftet und verbrachte zwölf Jahre in den faschistischen Kerkern, bis es ihm 1944 gelang, von einem Evakuierungstransport eines Konzentrationlagers zu fliehen. Unmittelbar nach der Befreiung vom Faschismus durch die Sowjetunion nahm Fritz Selbmann in Leipzig die politische Arbeit wieder auf. und beteiligte sich in verantwortungsvoller Stellung am Aufbau der antifaschistisch-demokratischen Ordnung. Er wurde 1946 zum Minister für Wirtschaft und Wirtschaftsplanung des Landes Sachsen ernannt und 1949 zum Minister für Industrie. 1954–1958 war Fritz Selbmann der Vorstandsvorsitzende der Sowjetisch-Deutschen Aktiengesellschaft Wismut, die nach 1945 den Uranerzbergbau in Sachsen und Thüringen mit einer Stammbelegschaft von rund 45.000 Beschäftigten fortführte. Und schließlich im Alter von fast 70 Jahren widmete er sich ganz und gar der Schriftstellerei.

Martin Reso: Genosse Selbmann, am Ende Ihrer Autobio­graphie steht der schöne Satz von Theodor Fontane: „Ich fange erst an!“ Lassen Sie mich diesen programmati­schen Satz als Ausgangspunkt für meine Fragen nehmen. Sie haben erst im fortgeschrittenen Alter Belletristik zu schreiben begonnen. Wie würden Sie Ihr Verhältnis als Schriftsteller zur Aufgabe der Künstler in der entwickelten sozialistischen Gesellschaft bestimmen? Welche Erfahrun­gen bezeichnen Sie als das Agens eines Künstlers über­haupt und als für Sie selbst im besonderen?

Fritz Selbmann: Sie knüpfen an den letzten Satz meines letzten Buches „Alternative, Bilanz, Credo“, erschienen im Mai 1969, an. Dieses Buch ist eine Autobiographie im strengsten Sinne. Ich hoffe, Sie haben nicht die Absicht, bei diesem nun beginnenden Gespräch über Literatur und über mich nur an diesem meinem letzten Buch oder gar an seinem letzten Satz hängenzubleiben. Ich habe doch auch vorher einiges geschrieben, das ich, bei aller gebotenen Bescheidenheit, die dem Autor wohl ansteht, nicht ganz vergessen lassen möchte. …

Nach dem Ende des Faschismus

Als sich nach fünfzehn Jahren der Kreis wieder einmal schloß und ich endlich ans Schreiben denken konnte, war ich ein anderer Mensch geworden; und auch die Welt um mich, in unserem Lande war eine andere geworden. Aus dem unsicheren Provisorium der Besatzungszonen waren Staaten geworden, bei uns der erste sozialistische Staat deutscher Nation, aus der Trümmerlandschaft des Ka­tastrophenjahres die sich entwickelnde sozialistische Gesellschaft. Damit nun komme ich endlich zu Ihrer ersten Frage: Wie ist mein Verhältnis zur Aufgabe der Künstler in der sozialistischen Gesellschaft? Das reduziert sich schließ­lich auf die einfachere Frage nach der Rolle des Künstlers oder eigentlich der Kunst überhaupt im Sozialismus.

Wozu braucht man Kunst und Literatur?

Kunst ist in jeder sich entwickelnden und sich entfaltenden Gesellschaft und für die Menschen darin unabdingbares Lebenselement und nicht, wie mancherorts, auch noch bei uns, geglaubt wird, ein im Grunde überflüssiges Lu­xuskonsumgut einer privilegierten Schicht des Volkes, einer irgendwie gearteten Elite der Gesellschaft. Die Kunst ist vor allem das älteste, das in der Phylogenese des Menschen frühestens entstandene Erkenntnis- und Ausdrucksmittel. Die Kunst ist älter als die Wissenschaft, deren Entstehung und Entwicklung ohne ihr wichtigstes Medium, die Schrift, nicht denkbar ist. …

Eine Orientierung im Leben

Der Mensch war der Kunst bedürftig, um die Welt und sich selbst zu erkennen, die Welt und sich selbst mit allen Wünschen und Vorstellungen, Idolen und Ängsten zu gestalten und sich in seinem Leben mit seinen Wider­sprüchen und seinen fürchterlichen Unverständlichkeiten zurechtzufinden und behaupten zu können, er bedurfte ihrer, um überhaupt Mensch zu werden und zu bleiben, das heißt ein soziales Wesen, ein „zoon politikon“, ein ge­sellschaftsbildendes Individuum, vernunftbegabt, wis­senschaftsfähig, schönheitsempfindlich.

Kunst als Waffe im Klassenkampf

Und diese menschbildende Kraft und Funktion hat die Kunst nicht eingebüßt. Gewiß war in der antagonistisch widersprüchlich gewordenen Klassengesellschaft des späten Kapitalismus die Kunst zum elitären „Bildungsgut“, zum Privilegium einer vielfach übersättigten herrschenden Klasse, zu einem zusätzlichen Beherrschungsmittel im täglichen, alltäglichen, im „gewöhnlichen“ Klassenkampf geworden, zeitweise zu einem selbstgenügsamen „Ding an sich und für sich“ – l’art pour l’art — oder zum harm- und wirkungslosen Narren der Gesellschaft degradiert, zum Clown, dessen Ansichten die Gesellschaft nicht ernst, ja die sie kaum noch zur Kenntnis nimmt.

Die Literatur als Bildungselement

Mit dem Übergang zum Sozialismus kommt die Welt­geschichte wieder mit sich selbst ins reine, findet die ge­sellschaftliche Entwicklung wieder zu ihren Gesetzen zurück. Und damit kommt auch die Kunst wieder zu ihrem natürlichen Recht, sie wird wieder gesellschaftsfähig und gemeinschaftsbildend, sie wird wieder notwendig für die Gesellschaft und die Menschen. Die Kunst als ge­sellschaftliches Bildungselement wird wieder wesentlich in einer Welt, deren oberstes Prinzip die Selbstver­wirklichung des Menschen ist.

Der Mensch im Sozialismus

In diesem gesellschaftlichen Prozeß der Selbstver­wirklichung des Menschen, den wir nach Marx ,,Sozialis­mus“ nennen, ist die Hilfe und Mitwirkung der Kunst unerläßlich. Der Mensch unserer Zeit, der Beherrscher und Gestalter der sozialistischen und der wissenschaftlich-­technischen Revolution als der Zweieinigkeit des sozialen Fortschritts heute, er lebt nicht vom Brot allein, von der materiellen Produktion, von der Meisterung der Pro­duktivkräfte einschließlich der modernen Wissenschaft und Technik, er würde geistig verkümmern, vereinsamen, verkrüppeln, böte ihm die Praxis der sich entwickelnden sozialistischen Gesellschaft nichts anderes als ökonomi­sche Werte und technische Abenteuer, böte sie ihm nicht mehr und nichts anderes als die Konsumgüter unserer Zeit, Mittel des Lebens und der Lebenserleichterung, böte sie ihm nicht auch das emotionelle Erlebnis, das nur die Kunst zu vermitteln vermag. Ich weiß nicht, ob ich deutlich genug dargestellt habe, was ich für die der Kunst zukommende Aufgabe in der sich entfaltenden sozialistischen Gesellschaftsordnung und für mein eigenes Verhältnis hierzu halte.

Aber Sie haben ja noch eine zweite Frage gestellt. Was das Agens eines ,,Künstlers überhaupt“ ist, weiß ich nicht. Ich bin „über­haupt“ kein Literaturtheoretiker, und ich habe weder genügend Zeit noch genügeud Wissen, um eine so aufs Allgemeine und Abstrakte zielende Frage beantworten zu können, ohne in Gefahr zu geraten, ein tüchtiges Stück daneben zu hauen. Was mich selbst betrifft, so hoffe ich allerdings doch, nach einigem Nachdenken eine Antwort zustande zu bringen. Bekannt ist, daß ich über ein sehr breites Erfahrungs- und Erlebnisspektrum verfüge, aus dem ich Stoff und Anstöße für literarische Arbeiten gewinnen kann.

Meine drei Erfahrungsbereiche

Ich möchte mich aber auf die Darstellung von drei Erfahrungskomplexen beschränken, die sowohl für meine Beschäftigung mit Literatur überhaupt wie auch für die Wahl des Stoffes und der Gestaltungsmittel meines Buches als Agens, das heißt als wirkender Anstoß gelten können.

1. Das Erlebnis des Faschismus oder, wenn Sie wollen, des antifaschistischen Widerstandes. Sie wissen, daß diese Thematik in all meinen Arbeiten drin ist. Ganz allgemein halte ich bei aller Hochbewertung der literarischen Vor­lagen, die uns die Gegenwart bietet, das Thema der Kontinuität der Geschichte der Arbeiterbewegung für eines der wichtigsten und wesentlichsten unseres dem historischen Auftrag der Arbeiterklasse dienenden Lite­raturbemühens. Ich habe in früher Jugend den Satz von Lenin begriffen: „Wer sich zur Geschichte seiner Be­wegung verhält wie einer, der sich an nichts erinnert, der kann kein klassenbewußter Arbeiter sein.“

Ich sehe es als einen meiner wichtigsten Klassenaufträge an, immer wieder zum kontinuierlichen Geschichtsdenken anzuregen. Die Tradition des antifaschistischen Wider­standskampfes halte ich für ungeheuer wichtig für die Bewußtseinsentwicklung unserer und der uns nach­folgenden Generation. Daher betrachte ich meine eigenen Erfahrungen aus jener schrecklichen und zugleich so heroischen Zeit als eminent wichtig für mein literarisches Engagement.

2. Eine wichtige Erfahrung der Nachkriegszeit, während der ich vorwiegend mit Dingen aus der Entwicklung der Wirtschaft, also mit der Lösung der entscheidenden historischen Aufgabe dieser Epoche, der Schaffung der ökonomischen Grundlagen des Sozialismus in der DDR, beschäftigt war, liegt für mich in der ebenfalls auf Lenin zurückzuführenden Erkenntnis, daß die Veränderungen im Bewußtsein der Menschen ungemein schwieriger zu bewirken sind und viel langsamer und auch mit immer wieder auftretenden Rückschlägen verbunden sind. Lenin sprach deshalb sogar ausdrücklich von der „Kul­turrevolution“ als der wohlverstanden zweiten, schweren und länger dauernden Etappe der sozialistischen Re­volution. Ohne Zweifel bietet die Kunst und vor allem die Literatur die effektivsten Möglichkeiten zur direkten Einwirkung auf die Bewußtseinsbildung und -veränderung.

Der Abschnitt „Kunst und Literatur“ erschien mir, nach zwei Jahrzehnten Engagement in der Branche „Ver­änderung, Entwicklung und Strukturwandlungen in der ökonomischen Basis“ unserer Gesellschaft, als der wich­tigst gewordene Frontabschnitt meiner Teilnahme am revolutionären Prozeß. Und da es in allen Zeiten meiner Teilnahme an dem historischen Abenteuer des re­volutionären Kampfes meiner Klasse mein Ehrgeiz war, dort zu sein, wo die wichtigsten und folgenreichsten Entscheidungen zu treffen, vorzubereiten und durch­zusetzen sind, ist es ganz folgerichtig, daß ich mich, als die Zeit dafür gekommen war, damit zu beschäftigen begann, Literatur zu machen, Literatur als Waffe im Kampf der Klassen um die Zukunft.

3. Ein entscheidender Anstoß für meine Beschäftigung mit Literatur war die Erkenntnis, daß die Person des Indu­striearbeiters und die industrielle Arbeitswelt in unserer Literatur eine nur geringe Rolle spielten als Objekt der Literatur, als Gegenstand der literarischen Bemühung um die Widerspiegelung unserer gesellschaftlichen Realität. Mir erschien das wegen und gerade angesichts der lauten Bekenntnisse zum sozialistischen Realismus unnatürlich, unverhältnismäßig, ja geradezu ein wenig unehrlich, und ich meinte, man sollte das ändern.

Da aber schon immer, wenn ich glaubte, daß etwas Bestimmtes getan werden müßte, ich versuchen mußte, es selbst zu tun, wenn ich mir die Kraft dazu und die Fähigkeit zutraue, so liegt es nahe, daß der Wunsch, unsere so­zialistische Gegenwartsliteratur auf diesen Realitäts­bereich hinzulenken, zu einem, vielleicht zu dem mich am meisten bewegenden Agens meiner Teilnahme am Lite­raturprozeß geworden ist.


Über meine Motivation und Zielstellungen

Martin Reso: Pawlow spricht über den „Zielreflex“ und definiert ihn mit den Worten: ,,Der Zielreflex hat eine ungeheure Lebensbedeutung, er stellt die Grundlage der Le­bensenergie eines jeden von uns dar. Nur das Leben dessen ist schön und stolz, der sein ganzes Leben lang nach einem ständig erreichbaren, aber nie zu erreichenden Ziel strebt oder mit gleichem Eifer von einem Ziel zum anderen übergeht. Das ganze Leben, all seine Verbesserungen, seine ganze Kultur wird zu einem Zielreflex. Es kann aber nur erreicht werden von Menschen, die einem bestimmten Lebensziel zustreben.“ Wenn man diese Definition in ihrem wesentlichen Gehalt nimmt, was würden Sie und aus welchen Gründen als „Zielreflex“ Ihres Wirkens ansehen?

Fritz Selbmann: Dieses Zitat von Pawlow ist sehr interessant. Ich habe es bisher nicht gekannt, auch nicht den Terminus „Zielreflex“, aber ich habe dessenungeachtet über die Sache selbst wiederholt geredet und, ich glaube, sogar geschrieben. Man hat mich oft gefragt, was ein älter werdender Mensch tun und haben müsse, um nicht vorzeitig alt und verbraucht zu scheinen. Meine Meinung in einem Satz: Solange ein Mensch noch ein Ziel vor Augen hat, das er erreichen muß, noch eine Aufgabe vor sich sieht, die er unter Einsatz all seiner Kräfte lösen muß, solange wird er nicht wirklich alt. Das gilt natürlich nur generell und prinzipiell und kann nicht konkret in jedem Einzelfall verifiziert werden. Ich glaube aber, daß es mit der These Pawlows gut übereinstimmt.

Welche Aufgaben hatte ich mir gestellt?

Nun zu der Frage nach dem „Zielreflex“ meines Wirkens. Natürlich komme ich mit einem Zielreflex, mit einer Auf­gabensetzung für das ganze Leben gewissermaßen, nicht aus, sagen wir, mit der allgemeinen Lebenszielsetzung der Teilnahme an dem geschichtlichen Auftrag der Arbeiter­klasse, die alte kapitalistische Ordnung der Dinge in der Welt zu liquidieren und die neue Gesellschaftsordnung des Sozialismus zu schaffen. Eine solche allgemeine Per­spektive wäre zu unpräzise, um in jeder Wendung des Geschichts- und des individuellen Lebensablaufs als wir­kende Kraft für die ständige Erneuerung der Le­bensenergie auszureichen.

Was waren die entscheidenden „Zielreflexe“ meines Lebens?

Ich habe also nacheinander mehrere derartiger Pawlow­scher „Zielreflexe“ gehabt, die jeweils stets für einen großen Lebensabschnitt Richtung und Intensität meines Wirkens bestimmten. Nehmen wir drei aufeinander­folgende Abschnitte meines Lebens. Als im Jahre 1933 die faschistische Nacht über Deutsch­land hereinbrach, schien mein bis dahin wirkendes Le­bensziel, die Gewinnung der Mehrheit der Arbeiterklasse für die Sache der proletarischen Revolution, für immer illusorisch und unerreichbar geworden zu sein. Es ist be­kannt, daß dies nicht die Meinung der Mehrzahl der Kom­munisten war.


1. Ziel: Das Überleben im Faschismus

Immerhin aber war mir, als ich verhaftet war und für mich die „lange Nacht“ zwölfjährigen Gefan­genseins begann, eines klar: Ich mußte mir ein ganz konkre­tes Ziel für den nächsten Abschnitt meines Lebens setzen, etwas, woran ich mich festhalten und in allen Widrigkeiten und Niederschlägen immer wieder aufrichten konnte. Ich mußte mir also, nach der Terminologie Pawlows, einen neuen Zielreflex zurechtbauen; ich habe es getan, und es hat geholfen.

Es war der Vorsatz, den ich mir durch nichts erschüttern ließ, die Nacht des Faschismus zu überleben, auf jeden Fall und unter allen Umständen diese ge­schichtliche Rückfallsperiode zu überdauern. Natürlich mußte man dazu völlig überzeugt sein, daß die faschistische Diktatur eine temporäre Erscheinung, daß sie letzten Endes irgendwann, in einer für mein Leben relevanten Zeit, überwunden und abgetan sein würde. Natürlich gehörte dazu die unerschütterliche Überzeugung von der Richtig­keit und Gültigkeit der eigenen politischen Meinung, das heißt das Vertrauen in die Sache der eigenen re­volutionären Partei.

Und das Bewußtsein dieses Lebensziels hat mir, so glaube ich, tatsächlich geholfen zu überleben.

Ich habe vor allem in fünf Jahren Konzentrationslager die immer wieder bestätigte Erfahrung gemacht, daß intellektuell hoch­stehende Menschen psychisch versagten und dann auch dem physischen Verfall anheimfielen, die bei aller Über­legenheit des Verstandes und der Geisteskräfte kein festes weltanschauliches Fundament ihres Lebens mitbrachten und die keine Perspektive für das „Nachher“ hatten. Andererseits habe ich während der ganzen Nazizeit auch in den schrecklichsten und dunkelsten Situationen immer das Gefühl gehabt, daß ich durchkomme, daß ich die Schreckenszeit überleben werde. Nun, schließlich, ich habe überlebt.

2. Ziel: Der aktive Aufbau der neuen Gesellschaft

Als ich im Jahre 1945, nach dem Ende der Nazizeit, in führende Positionen der Leitung von Staat und Wirtschaft berufen wurde, war mein bisheriger „Zielreflex“ hinfällig geworden, die Zeit und die Geschichte hatten ihn hinfällig werden lassen, und ich brauchte ihm nicht nachzutrauern. Ich habe nicht lange Zeit benötigt, um meinem Leben ein neues konkretes Ziel zu setzen.

Ich wurde berufen, am Wiederaufbau der Wirtschaft aus den Trümmern der Nazikatastrophe und am Aufbau eines neuen antifaschistisch-demokratischen Staatswesens in einer füh­renden Funktion zu wirken. Diese Aufgabe so gut als nur möglich zu lösen, das Elend und die Not der Bevölkerung in den ersten Nachkriegsjahren zu lindern und zugleich die geschichtlich notwendigen Veränderungen in der Wirt­schaft und im ganzen gesellschaftlichen Leben konsequent und ohne Zurückweichen vor Schwierigkeiten und Wider­ständen durchzusetzen, mein Teil beizutragen zur Über­leitung der antifaschistisch-demokratischen Umwälzung in die sozialistische Revolution in unserem Land, das war in jenen Jahren das mir bewußte und erklärte Ziel meines Lebens und meiner Arbeit.

Es war wiederum ein gutes Ziel, und ich glaube, es hat mir in anderthalb Jahrzehnten viel Kraft gegeben, und ich bin dabei nicht alt geworden!


3. Ziel: Warum ich Schriftsteller wurde…

Der dritte Testfall ist gegeben durch meinen Neubeginn als Schriftsteller Ende der fünfziger Jahre. Hier nun gibt es für einen Menschen meines Alters schon kürzere und leichter überschaubare Zielzeiträume.

Ein Bücherschreiber setzt sich ja mit dem Neubeginn der Arbeit an jedem Buch erneut ein konkretes Ziel: das Buch fertigzustellen, es gut zu Ende zu bringen, es mit dem Verlag druckfertig zu machen, sich um Buchkritik und Lesermeinung zu kümmern, Kor­rekturen vorzunehmen; soweit nötig und möglich – all das gehört zu dem mit jedem Buchneubeginn verbundenen Setzen eines neuen Zielreflexes. Ich fühle mich bei der Hinarbeitung auf immer wieder neue Zielpunkte eigentlich recht wohl, und ich glaube, daß darin eine Ursache liegt für meinen im Grunde nicht ganz meinem wirklichen Geburts­scheinalter entsprechenden äußeren Habitus und meine Freude am Leben und die dazugehörige Kraft zum Leben.


Über den Klassenstandpunkt

Martin Reso: Ihr letztes Buch ist die Autobiographie „Alternative – Bilanz – Credo“. … Nun ist der Grad der Erkenntnis seiner eigenen Zeit ja nicht allein abhängig von der Intelligenz des Auto­biographen, sondern auch sehr stark von seinem Gefühl für seine Position in der jeweiligen Klasse, von der Erkenntnis oder Nichterkenntnis seiner Klassenlage. … Aus diesem Bedürfnis, ein mehr oder weniger genaues, gewissermaßen von der eigenen Person abstrahiertes Bild zu schaffen, und aus der Absicht heraus, die eigene Posi­tion in gebührender Weise zu profilieren bzw. die eigene Leistung richtig einzuschätzen und zu würdigen, sind die meisten Autobiographien verfaßt worden. … In den meisten Autobiographien wird der Schreibende seine Entwicklung bejahen, Gründe für sein So-Sein und Gewordensein anführen, die Einflüsse benennen, die seinen Charakter prägen halfen, und – je nach Tem­perament und Position – ungeniert auch jene Partien seines Lebens ausbreiten, die im Widerspruch zu herrschenden Gepflogenheiten, Konventionen und Maximen standen.

Fritz Selbmann: Die sozialistisch-realistische Literatur soll die Realität unseres Lebens und der Welt, in der wir leben, wider­spiegeln. In dieser unserer Welt aber gibt es nicht nur Menschen mit nur positiven Eigenschaften, ja, meine Erfahrung lehrt mich, daß es von dieser Art nur sehr wenige gibt. Die weitaus meisten Menschen auch in unserer, der sozialistischen Welt haben gute und weniger gute oder sogar häßliche Eigenschaften.

Die dialektischen Widersprüche im Sozialismus

Und gerade aus diesem Beisammensein von Gut und Böse, Positivem und Ne­gativem auch in den Menschen unserer Zeit, auch in den Menschen, die den Sozialismus aufbauen und dabei oft Heldentaten vollbringen, die Heldentaten der „ge­wöhnlichen Leute“, erwachsen die echten Konflikte, von denen Walter Ulbricht auf der zweiten Bitterfelder Kon­ferenz sagte, daß es ohne sie keine großen Werke der Literatur geben könne, daß Kunst ohne sie steril würde. Und Walter Ulbricht sagte ausdrücklich, daß großen Konflikten in der Literatur „dialektische Widersprüche unserer eigenen Entwicklung“ zugrunde liegen müßten. Wo sollen aber Konflikte und Widersprüche herkommen, wenn die Literatur sich darauf beschränken würde, nur positive Helden oder auf „nur-positiv“ getrimmte Helden zu gestalten.

Warum sind Vorbilder so wichtig?

Ich bin also für den Helden in der Literatur, ich bin aber für die Widerspiegelung von wirklichen Menschen mit ihren Widersprüchen und ihren meistens überhaupt erst Gestaltungswürdigen Kämpfen mit ihrer Umwelt und mit sich selbst. Natürlich will ich auch auf die Vor- und Leit­bildfunktion des literarischen Helden nicht verzichten. Der Leser unserer Zeit und in unserer Welt will nicht nur die Konflikte unserer literarischen Figuren kennenlernen, sondern auch deren Lösungsmöglichkeiten. Der Leser und Zuschauer unserer Zeit will sich mit den Helden unserer Literatur identifizieren oder sich mit ihnen im Vergleich setzen können, aber er will auch bei der Aneignung des Stoffs unserer Literatur erfahren, wie er selbst wachsen und sich der ihm zufallenden Aufgabe beim gesellschaftlichen Fortschritt, dem Besser- und Schönermachen  unserer Welt würdig und gewachsen zeigen kann…

Und worin besteht nun die künstlerische Freiheit?

Der Künstler in der entwickelten sozialistischen Gesellschaft ist in einem Maße frei in der Wahl seiner Stoffe und der Formen ihrer literarischen Gestaltung, wie sich das der Autor in den Gefilden der manipulierten und monopolisierten „Freiheit der Kunst“ kaum träumen lassen kann. … Natürlich kann es auch vorkommen, daß ein Manuskript keinen Verleger findet, aber das soll überall vorkommen. Natürlich kann es vorkommen, daß einem Autor nicht freigestellt werden kann, ein Werk unter die Leute zu bringen, das in seiner Tendenz grob gegen die von der Gesellschaft als für sie verbindlich erkannten politischen, ethischen und ästhetischen Grundsätze und Regeln gerichtet ist. Aber „Un-Fälle“ dieser Art sind so selten, daß damit nichts oder fast nichts am Prinzip der künstlerischen Freiheit im Literaturschaffen der sozialistischen Gesellschaft ge­ändert ist.

Der gesellschaftliche Auftrag des Schriftstellers in der DDR

Der DSV, die Organisation der Schriftsteller der Republik, sieht seinen gesellschaftlichen Auftrag darin, die Autoren unseres Landes zu fördern, materiell mit nicht un­erheblichen Mitteln, ideell vor allem mit der Durchführung von Veranstaltungen zur geistigen Weiterbildung und zur ästhetischen Orientierung. Der Verband nimmt, wenn gefordert und erforderlich, die Interessen seiner Mitglieder als Berufsorganisation wahr. Was der kürzlich in West­deutschland gegründete Dachverband der Schriftsteller­organisationen in reichlich verwirrten und verworrenen Deklamationen als anzusteuerndes Ziel seiner Be­mühungen ankündigte, hat der DSV schon seit Jahren in seiner Arbeit verwirklicht.


Über den Realismus in Kunst und Literatur

(Anmerkung: Heute wird soviel Unsinn über den Sozialismus erzählt. Es werden Lügen und Verleumdungen über die DDR verbreitet. Doch was können und was müssen wir dagegen tun?)

 Martin Reso: Das Stichwort sozialistischer Realismus ist wieder­holt in Ihren Antworten gefallen. Ich wäre Ihnen verbun­den, wenn Sie als produzierender Künstler einiges zu diesem so oft strapazierten und ebenso oft miß­verstandenen Terminus und Methodenbegriff sagen wür­den.

Fritz Selbmann: Ich möchte in den wenigen Zeilen, die mir für diese Antwort zur Verfügung stehen, nicht den Ver­such machen, den vielen umstrittenen Definitionen des Methodenbegriffs „Sozialistischer Realismus“ noch eine weitere, natürlich wieder mißverständliche und von allen Seiten dann ebenfalls wieder mißverstandene Deutung hinzuzufügen. Mir scheint, daß das Beste hierzu in Kürze Bertolt Brecht gesagt hat: „Der Künstler muß der Welt den Spiegel vorhalten. Das ist gleichbedeutend mit kritischer Auseinandersetzung.“

Was ist sozialistischer Realismus?

Der Künstler – und die Kunst und die Literatur – soll die Welt widerspiegeln, die Welt, so wie sie ist und wie der Künstler mit kritischer Parteinahme sie zu reflektieren imstande ist. Aber Brecht fügt noch hinzu: „Seine (des Künstlers) Auseinandersetzung gipfelt in der Mitveränderung und Mitgestaltung im Sinne der 11. Feuer­bachthese von Marx.“ Hier haben wir, bei Brecht, die beiden Hauptkomponenten des sozialistischen Realismus: Wirklichkeitssinn, Wider­spiegelung der Realität, kritisch ausgedeutet einerseits und Parteilichkeit auf der anderen Seite.

Der Neo-Realismus in der kleinbürgerlichen westlichen Unterhaltungsliteratur

Was den Realismus betrifft, so hat er in den letzten Jahrzehnten ohne Zweifel eine Renaissance erlebt. Die gesamte ernst zu nehmende Literatur in nahezu allen Breiten und Längen der Welt ist heute realistisch, manche sagen verschämt „neo­realistisch“. Das gilt sogar für den westdeutschen aus­gesprochenen Spieß- und Kleinbürgerroman oder die psychopathologische Literatur, die uns vor allem Amerika bescherte.

Was ist der Wertmaßstab für gute Literatur?

Natürlich ist unser sozialistischer Realismus etwas anderes und etwas mehr als jene Spätlinge der Kunstkonzeption einer vergangenen Zeit. Übrigens fällt mir da noch ein Satz von Brecht in die Hände, den der Stückeschreiber denen ins Stammbuch geschrieben hat, die mit der Schublehre ästhetischer Prinzipien den Gehalt jedes literarischen Opus am sozialistischen Realismus messen möchten.

„Was sozialistischer Realismus ist, soll man an der Realität messen und nicht an Prinzipien der Ästhetik, auch nicht der des sozialistischen Realismus.“


Über die Wahrheit und die künftige Wirklichkeit

Martin Reso: Ich möchte Sie bitten, etwas über die Phantasie als aktiver Faktor bei der Schaffung von neuer Wirklichkeit zu sagen, weil das m. E. viele Rezipienten und Kritiker bei ihrer Tätigkeit nicht oder nur ungenügend sehen.

Fritz Selbmann: Daß Literatur ohne Phantasie nicht zu machen ist, das ist eine Binsenweisheit, und man sollte eigentlich gar nicht darüber sprechen. Man kann überhaupt nichts ohne Phantasie schreiben, nicht mal einen Leitartikel, einen Wetterbericht oder eine Gerichtsreportage. Sie sprechen von neuer Wirklichkeit, und wir tun gut daran zu betonen, daß es sich um eine neue Wirklichkeit handelt. Das literarische Werk soll ja nicht die Wirklichkeit einfach abschildern, kopieren, reproduzieren, die Realität praktisch noch einmal schaffen.

Das Wesentliche erkennen und daraus lernen…

Wenn die einfache un­verwandelte und unangereicherte Wiedergabe der Realität schon Literatur und Kunst zu machen imstande wäre, dann müßten die Fotografen die besten Künstler sein, und die Schriftsteller würden gut daran tun, Füller und Schreib­maschine mit all dem Ballast an Phantasie und Ein­bildungskraft und emotionalem Beiwerk in den Müll­schlucker zu werfen und sich eine Kamera zuzulegen.

…es kommt aber darauf an, die Welt zu verändern!

Die Literatur soll aber im Grunde eigentlich nicht selbst diese neuen Wirklichkeiten schaffen, sie soll Möglich­keiten entwickeln und sie dem lesenden oder zuschauenden Zeitgenossen in die Hand geben, damit er sie benutzt, um neue Wirklichkeiten werden zu lassen. Die Literatur soll vor allem Modelle für die Veränderbarkeit und die Ver­änderung der Welt und der Menschen schaffen im Sinne der Brechtschen Maxime von der Anwendung der Marxschen elften These zu Feuerbach.

Feuerbachthese

Wie soll unsere Zukunft einmal aussehen?

Diese Aufgabe ist nun aber ohne Phantasie überhaupt nicht zu lösen. Solche Modelle der Weltveränderung erfordern ja eine regelrechte Extrapolation über das gegenwärtig Wirkliche hinaus.

Und woher soll der Schriftsteller das Material für solche Extrapolation, das ihm das intensivste und einfühlsamste Studium der Realität nicht geben kann, hernehmen, wenn ihm nicht die Phantasie zur Verfügung stünde, die ihm hilft, über das gegenwärtig Reale hinaus in noch nicht dagewesene, in noch nicht erlebte und erfahrene Realitätsbereiche vorzustoßen…

Martin Reso: Vielen Dank, Genosse Selbmann, für das Gespräch.

Quelle: Anneliese Löffler (Hrsg.) „Auskünfte – Werkstattgespräche mit DDR-Autoren“, Aufbau-Verlag Berlin und Weimar, 1976, S. 175-200. (gekürzt; Zwischenüberschriften eingefügt)

Die demoralisierte Arbeiterklasse

Warum hat Stalin die deutschen Kommunisten 1945 davor gewarnt, unmittelbar nach der Niederlage des deutschen Faschismus zum Aufbau des Sozialismus überzugehen?  In einer Rede auf der Wirtschaftskonferenz der KPD im November 1945 erklärte Fritz Selbmann es so:

Eine Arbeiterklasse, die 12 Jahre dem Nationalsozialismus Gefolgschaft geleistet, die am 22. Juni 1941 die Schande des Überfalls auf die Sowjetunion nicht verhindert hat, eine Arbeiterklasse, die bis in die letzten Wochen und Monaten vor dem Zusam­menbruch nicht nur gezwungen, sondern zu einem großen Teil freiwillig mitgegangen ist, eine Arbeiterklasse, von der große Teile geglaubt haben, daß es möglich sei, daß Deutschland auf Kosten anderer Völker sich ein besseres Leben erringen könnte, die 12 Jahre den Grundsatz der internationalen Solidarität vergessen hat, eine Arbeiter­klasse, bei der 12 Jahre lang das Klassenbewußtsein verschüttet und demoralisiert war, kann den Schritt zum Sozialismus noch nicht gehen. Darum wollen wir die De­mokratie, darum wollen wir, daß in dieser Periode der demokratischen Entwicklung Deutschlands auch die Kräfte der Arbeiterklasse organisatorisch und ideologisch herangebildet werden für unsere neuen geschichtlichen Aufgaben.

Quelle: Fritz Selbmann, „Acht Jahre und ein Tag. Bilder aus den Gründerjahren der DDR“, Berlin 1999, S. 89.

Siehe auch:

So plünderten die US-Amerikaner 1945 Leipzig…

Kampf gegen die reaktionären Kräfte und der Einfluß der Arbeiterklasse im Jahr der Gründung der DDR (1949)


29. September 1949: Genossen Fritz Selbmann zum 50. Geburtstag !

Tägliche Rundschau Sept1949
pdfimage  Fritz Selbmann – Bewältigung des Lebens

TOTALITÄRE FRATZE: GRÜNER HOFREITER TRÄUMT VON TELEGRAM- UND TWITTER-VERBOTEN

“Jedoch der schrecklichste der Schrecken, das ist der Mensch in seinem Wahn”: Anton(ia) Hofreiter(in) (Foto:dts)

Spätestens nach den Wahldebakeln in Thüringen und Sachsen liegen bei den Grünen endgültig die Nerven blank, und ihre totalitären Instinkte kommen immer unverhüllter zum Vorschein. Nachdem der Parteivorstand eine Task Force” aller Bundes- und Landesministerien forderte, die angebliche „Desinformation“ bekämpfen soll – natürlich zum “Schutz unserer Demokratie” –, will der Grünen-Bundestagsabgeordnete Anton Hofreiter nun auch noch „virtuelle Agenten“ auf Telegram aufbieten – angeblich, um gegen Terror vorzugehen. „Eines der größten Probleme von Extremismus ist die Online-Radikalisierung“, meinte Hofreiter. „Wir müssen die Verbreitung menschen- und verfassungsfeindlicher Inhalte im Internet stoppen“, forderte er. Dabei will er Online-Netzwerke, die sich “der Durchsetzung von Recht und Gesetz verweigern”, zur Rechenschaft ziehen und „notfalls“ sperren. Dies müsse ausdrücklich auch Twitter-Chef Elon Musk treffen. Der Staat müsse mit aller Härte vorgehen und dürfe sich dabei neuen Technologien nicht verschließen, so Hofreiter weiter.

Was dieses in Herkunft, Denkweise und Intellekt gleichermaßen provinzielle grüne Catweazle-Double hier postuliert, ist einmal mehr die übliche verlogene Leier: Unter dem Vorwand, “Terror” zu bekämpfen, soll die Internet-Kommunikation überwacht und zensiert werden. Es ist entlarvend, dass Hofreiter hierbei nur und ausgerechnet Telegram und Twitter in den Sinn kommen – also genau die beiden großen Plattformen, die sich dem europäischen Zensurregime verweigern. Er hätte auch den zum Meta-Konzern von Mark Zuckerberg gehörenden Messengerdienst Whatsapp erwähnen können; da dieser sich aber bereits weitgehend unterworfen hat, wird er, nach erfolgter Gleichschaltung,  nicht mehr der „Desinformation“ und der “Förderung des Terrorismus” beschuldigt; ein fragwürdiges “Gütesiegel”.

Inspiriert vom brasilianischen Vorbild

Überhaupt ist das, was Hofreiter und andere hier fordert, eine einzige Absurdität: Mit dem gleichen Argument könnte man den Chef der Post oder die CEOs von Mobilfunkanbietern zur Verantwortung ziehen, wenn man deren Dienstleistungen als technische Hilfestellung für kriminelle Machenschaften framt. In Wahrheit geht es allein darum, unliebsame Informationen zu unterdrücken, die gegen offizielle Narrative verstoßen. Vor allem deshalb wird Telegram-Chef Pawel Durow derzeit unter haarsträubenden Vorwänden in Frankreich festgehalten, und deshalb steht Elon Musk auf der schwarzen Liste der EU-Zensoren und der links-woken Kamarilla ganz oben.

Offenbar fühlt Hofreiter sich von seinem linksradikalen Gesinnungsgenossen, dem brasilianischen Präsidenten Lula da Silva, inspiriert. Dessen Lakai, Brasiliens oberste Richter Alexandre de Moraes, hatte Twitter vergangene Woche gesperrt und mit einer Geldstrafe in Höhe von drei Millionen Euro belegt. Wer sich dort dennoch Zugang zu verschaffen versucht (was über VPNs weiterhin möglich ist), muss mit einer Geldstrafe von umgerechnet 8.000 Euro rechnen. Solche totalitären Zustände schweben offenbar auch Hofreiter vor. Doch alle Vorstöße und Anmaßungen können nicht verhindern, dass die Uhr des linksgrün-woken Ambientes im globalen Weste zunehmend abläuft und sie zumindest mit Meinungsmehrheit und Wahlen keine Machtbasis mehr sichern können. In Deutschland gilt dies im Besonderen, wo sich die Schlinge um das Altparteienkartell immer mehr zuzieht. Umso mehr sind die abgewirtschafteten Systeme daher auf diktatorische und grundrechtsbeschränkende Maßnahmen angewiesen –  weshalb sie ihre autoritäre Fratze immer deutlicher zeigen.

DDR ist okäi

DDR ist okäi

Fritz Selbmann: Bekenntnis zur aktiven Bewältigung des Lebens. (Ein Interview)

In dem Band „Auskünfte – Werkstattgespräche mit DDR-Autoren“ erschien 1976, ein Jahr nach dem Tode Fritz Selbmanns, ein bemerkenswertes Interview, in dem der Schriftsteller seine Beweggründe, sich für den Aufbau des Sozialismus einzusetzen, ausführlich darlegt. Für Fritz Selbstmann war der … Fritz Selbmann: Bekenntnis zur aktiven Bewältigung des Lebens. (Ein Interview)weiterlesen

Sascha’s Welt

„Die Kunst ist vor allem das älteste, das in der Phylogenese des Menschen frühestens entstandene Erkenntnis- und Ausdrucksmittel. Die Kunst ist älter als die Wissenschaft, deren Entstehung und Entwicklung ohne ihr wichtigstes Medium, die Schrift, nicht denkbar ist. …

Der Mensch war der Kunst bedürftig, um die Welt und sich selbst zu erkennen, die Welt und sich selbst mit allen Wünschen und Vorstellungen, Idolen und Ängsten zu gestalten und sich in seinem Leben mit seinen Wider­sprüchen und seinen fürchterlichen Unverständlichkeiten zurechtzufinden und behaupten zu können, er bedurfte ihrer, um überhaupt Mensch zu werden und zu bleiben, das heißt ein soziales Wesen, ein „zoon politikon“, ein ge­sellschaftsbildendes Individuum, vernunftbegabt, wis­senschaftsfähig, schönheitsempfindlich.“

Damit ich nicht mißverstanden werde: Meine Kritik richtet sich nicht gegen Fritz Selbmann, sein Werk oder gar seinen Einsatz für den Sozialismus, aber gegen einem derartigen Idealismus, wie er in seinen Antworten zum Ausdruck kommt.

Kunst ist Ausdrucksmittel, aber doch kein Mittel der Erkenntnis!
Der Mensch „war und ist der Kunst nicht bedürftig“, genauso wie er der Religion nicht bedürftig war oder ist! Der Mensch bedarf nicht der Kunst, um ein Mensch – ein soziales Wesen – zu werden und zu bleiben, denn der Mensch ist bereits als „zoon“ von Natur aus ein soziales Wesen.

Kunst mit „der Phylogenese des Menschen“ in Verbindung zu bringen, will ich mal als Kokolores bezeichnen.

Die Entstehung und Entwicklung der Wissenschaft, ist ohne das (wichtige) Medium, die Schrift, denkbar, denn sie ist nicht einmal darauf angewiesen.

„Aus dem unsicheren Provisorium der Besatzungszonen waren Staaten geworden, bei uns der erste sozialistische Staat deutscher Nation, aus der Trümmerlandschaft des Katastrophenjahres die sich entwickelnde sozialistische Gesellschaft.“

Weshalb muß gerade das Jahr 1945 als „Katastrophenjahr“ bezeichnet werden?
Für die meisten Menschen – weltweit – war es ein Jahr des Sieges und der Hoffnung auf eine bessere Welt, vor allem für die Völker, die durch den Kolonialismus Europas, Japans und der USA unterdrückt wurden – und immer noch unterdrückt werden! —

Die Kolonien „lieferten“ Millionen von Soldaten [Hilfstruppen = Auxiliares bei Cäsar] gegen Hitlerdeutschland.

Davon hatten die Völker, die unter der Knute des Kolonialismus standen, zwar nichts, dennoch leite dieses „Katastrophenjahr“ – mit der Unterstützung der Sowjetunion – unter Stalin – die (wenn auch halbherzigen) Befreiungsbewegungen in den Kolonien ein.

Nur in der Sowjetischen Besatzungszone war ein Staat entstanden: Deutsche Demokratische Republik!

In den drei westlichen Besatzungszonen ist kein Staat entstanden! :::

Das Bundesverfassungsgericht stellte am 31. Juli 1973 bei der Überprüfung des Grundlagenvertrags mit der DDR fest (2 BvF 1/73; BVerfGE 36, 1 [6]):

„Das Grundgesetz – nicht nur eine These der Völkerrechtslehre und der Staatsrechtslehre! – geht davon aus, daß das Deutsche Reich [was lediglich der NAME des 1871 gegründeten Militär-Bündnisses ‚Ewiger Bund‘ „deutscher“ Fürsten, also den ewigen Vasallen des Papstes, ist] den Zusammenbruch 1945 überdauert hat und weder mit der Kapitulation noch durch Ausübung fremder Staatsgewalt in Deutschland durch die alliierten Okkupationsmächte noch später untergegangen ist; das ergibt sich aus der Präambel, aus Art. 16, Art. 23, Art. 116 und Art. 146 GG.

Das entspricht auch der ständigen Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, an der der Senat festhält.

Das Deutsche Reich [also das 1871 von „deutscher“ Fürsten, also den ewigen Vasallen des Papstes, gegründete Militär-Bündnisses ‚Ewiger Bund‘] existiert fort (BVerfGE 2, 266 [277]; 3, 288 [319 f.]; 5, 85 [126]; 6, 309 [336, 363]), besitzt nach wie vor Rechtsfähigkeit, ist allerdings als Gesamtstaat [der nie vorlag, denn es war ja ein Militär-Bündnis „deutscher“ Fürsten, also den ewigen Vasallen des Papstes,] mangels Organisation, insbesondere mangels institutionalisierter Organe selbst nicht handlungsfähig. Im Grundgesetz ist auch die Auffassung vom gesamtdeutschen Staatsvolk und von der gesamtdeutschen Staatsgewalt „verankert“ (BVerfGE 2, 266 [277]). Verantwortung für „Deutschland als Ganzes“ tragen – auch – die vier Mächte (BVerfGE 1, 351 [362 f., 367]).
————————————————-

Mit der Errichtung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland wurde nicht ein neuer westdeutscher Staat gegründet, sondern ein Teil Deutschlands neu organisiert.

Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland ist also nicht „Rechtsnachfolger“ des Deutschen Reiches, sondern als Staat [der sie nicht ist] identisch mit dem Staat „Deutsches Reich“ [der keiner ist, weil das ja ein von „deutschen“ Fürsten, also den ewigen Vasallen des Papstes, gegründeter Militär-BUND ist] – in Bezug auf seine räumliche Ausdehnung allerdings „teilidentisch“, so daß insoweit die Identität keine Ausschließlichkeit beansprucht. […] Sie beschränkt staatsrechtlich ihre Hoheitsgewalt auf den „Geltungsbereich des Grundgesetzes“.

Die Bundesrepublik […] fühlt sich aber auch verantwortlich für das ganze Deutschland […].

!!! Die Deutsche Demokratische Republik gehört zu Deutschland !!! [ — — !!! das ist der völkerrechtlich 1849 gegründete Staat – das Originäre staatliche Völkerrechtssubjekt der deutschen Völker und deutschen Länder !!! —- ] und kann im Verhältnis zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland nicht als Ausland angesehen werden.“
————————————————————————–
Also, die BRD ist Verwalterin eines Teils des Deutschen Reiches! [also einem Teil des von „deutschen“ Fürsten, also den ewigen Vasallen des Papstes, gegründeter Militär-BUNDES!] (Ein Teil Deutschlands wurde neu organisiert)

Aus diesem „Urteil“ ergibt sich denknotwendig, also von der Logik des Völkerrechts her, dass die DDR ein Staat ist. Aus der Verfassung dieses Staates DDR, ergibt sich nun weiter, dass

Die Verfassung der DDR – nicht nur eine These der Völkerrechtslehre und der Staatsrechtslehre! – ist und davon ausgeht, daß die DDR den Zusammenbruch 1989 überdauert hat und weder mit der „Erklärung der Volkskammer „‚zum Beitrittsgebiet des GG FÜR die BRD“‘

noch durch Ausübung fremder, völkerrechtlich ILLEGALER Gewalt DER durch die Ratifizierung des Staatsvertrages „“Vertrag über die abschließende Regelung in Bezug auf Deutschland“‚ (2+4-Vertrag“), der am 15. März 1991 in Kraft Getreten ist, aufgelösten BRD in Deutschland noch durch die alliierten Okkupationsmächte noch später untergegangen ist; dies ergibt sich sogar auch aus der Präambel, aus Art. 16, Art. 23, Art. 116 und Art. 146 des GG für die BRD selbst!!!

https://seidenmacher.wordpress.com/

The Fourth Reich

On a wing and a prayer

Radio Far Side

OK, you are going to have to bear with me a moment. We are dealing with complex situations, a lot of history, and linguistic manipulation to get to the zinger moment. By the end of this article, I expect the reader to understand — if not agree — with my thesis.

The first thing we need to do is clarify what “fascism” is. Fascism, or corporatism as Mussolini called it, is basically the same as socialism in most aspects. The difference is that corporations control the governments in fascism, and the government runs all the corporations in socialism. Down here in the trenches, there’s very little difference in the misery index. Mostly it’s a matter of who gets all the perks and benefits — corporate officers or government officials.

In essence, under fascism governments are the enforcement arm for cororate power, and in socialism corporations do the arm twisting for government power. Either way, we humans are squeezed for economic value to service a self-selected band of brigands, the color of whose coats matters little in the final analysis.The Moral Case for Fos…Epstein, AlexBest Price: $2.28Buy New $12.10(as of 08:00 UTC — Details)

The prolific author Joseph P. Farrell has pointed out many times that at the end of World War 2, the German government surrendered, but not the Nazi party. Another great author, Peter Levenda, has done yeoman’s work ferretting out the ratlines that helped top Nazis escape Europe, in addition to the US (Operation Paper Clip) and USSR (Operation Osoaviakhim) grabbing prize Nazis for their respective space programs and other “research” and intelligence networks.

The result is that we have a global network of ideologically aligned individuals and organizations leveraging their network to affect global events. A zoo of Quasi-Governmental Organizations (QGOs) and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) effectively dictate policies and socio-economic initiatives toward a singular goal: world governance (not government). It is my contention that most or all of these QGOs and NGOs are created and run by fascist ideologs looking to create a global pyramidal power structure with fully isolated, even invisible corporate overlords at the pyramidion running the show.

It is no secret that fleeing Nazis had access to vast amounts of wealth, generated either by controlling interests in megacorps like IG Farben, or looted from national and personal treasuries and vaults of conquered peoples. Just one minor example is the gold dumped in Lake Halstatt, Austria.

The looted wealth, and the intricate network of financial ties to corporations around the world has enabled the fascists to slowly dominate global power structures, either through enormous holding companies, like BlackRock and Vanguard, or by direct lobbying of national governments through the QGO/NGO networks, to enact enabling legislation that favors the networks and channels wealth to and through them.

The goal is to establish a rigid pyramid of command and control, wherein nations are subsumed into 18 regional “economic unions”. The 18 unions are then placed under the control of global organizations specialized in specific areas, such as the World Trade Organization (WTO), World Health Organization (WHO), World Bank/International Monetary Fund (IMF), International Standards Organization (ISO), and so on. The UN itself is a QGO, which coordinates funding and operations for the other organizations, functioning as the legal framework for the whole mess.

Examples of regional economic and trade organizations include North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA), the European Trade Organization (ETO), Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). These groups effect policies at the national and regional level on behalf of the global organizations, by recommending/pressuring individual nations to adopt policy packages attached to various financial rewards.

National governments are thus the enforcement arm for the global power structure, and the touch point where it all meets us regular folks. If the pyramidion wants us to buy Electric Vehicles (EVs), thus forcing us humans to financially support an entire controlled industrial sector (mining, refining, construction, distribution, fueling), then suddenly global governments are mandating EVs and scrambling to carve out a specialty in the market (batteries, assembly, charging stations), so that they can claim to have “created jobs” for hoi polloi.

The NGOs effect change in the social-cultural sphere. They manipulate educational systems, public affairs groups, media messaging, and similar outlets in order to alter and coordinate public opinion. Efforts such as DEI, ESG, Climate Change, Energy Transition, Green New Deal, and so forth are promulgated and controlled through the NGOs — essentially the agitprop arm of global governance.A Century of War: Linc…John V. DensonBest Price: $3.72Buy New$8.50(as of 07:45 UTC — Details)

If the pyramidion wants us to believe the global climate is an existential threat, then the NGOs set up educational programs, public outreach centers, media messaging, and so forth. The QGOs force governments to support the NGOs via outrageous sums of grants and aid, so that the hoi polloi fund their own captivity.

All of this is funded by two primary mechanisms: corporate investment and public aid. The latter is easy: governments are manipulated by internal agencies controlled by the fascist NGOs to offer aid packages, grants, loan guarantees, government programs and procurement, and similar benefits to the QGOs and NGOs. That much is fairly straightforward and clearly visible in the public sphere.

The more complex operation is looting major corporations to fund the global operations. This takes the form of investment blackmail — adopt these policies or we cut off your funding — and by directed corporate spending. Here we touch on the thing that has so many people confused and wondering what’s going on.

I will use the entertainment industry, since that is the one I am most familiar with, but similar tactics are used throughout the global economy.

Read the Whole Article

Copyright © Radio Far Side

Election Upheaval and Volkswagen Woes Dhow Germany’s Ruinous Price for Being Uncle Sam’s Lapdog

By Finian Cunningham
Strategic Culture

donate 

FacebookTwitter

Germany was hit with a double whammy this week as proof of the ruinous price its people are paying for their feckless government’s role as the United States lapdog.

Germany was hit with a double whammy this week as proof of the ruinous price its people are paying for their feckless government’s role as the United States lapdog.

First, there was the political bombshell of Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s coalition parties receiving a drubbing in elections. Then there was the shocking economic news that Volkswagen, the country’s flagship automaker, is planning to close down factories as a result of crippling production costs.

The reverberations are shaking the political and economic foundations not just of Germany but the entire European Union.Betrayal of the Americ…Rothbard, Murray N.Best Price: $20.49Buy New $12.95(as of 12:01 UTC — Details)

Both of these body blows to Germany stem from the same root cause: the Scholz government’s slavish following of U.S. foreign policy. (To be fair, the lackey syndrome pre-dates Scholz and was manifest too under his predecessor Angela Merkel. And again to be fair, it is not just a German condition. The whole of Europe is a lapdog to Uncle Sam – and paying a painful price for that dubious role.)

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) came first in the state election for Thuringia in what was seen as an embarrassing thrashing for Scholz’s Social Democrat Party and its coalition partners. The AfD made big gains, albeit coming second to the Christian Democrat Union, in elections for neighboring Saxony.

A lot of hysteria has accompanied the election breakthrough for the AfD which is invariably described as “far-right” and compared with the historic Nazi party. Tempering that hysteria, however, is the fact that the new leftwing party BSW also made impressive gains in the elections.

A more accurate reading of the results would be that the German people have used the elections to express deep disillusionment and anger at the established parties on a range of issues, including economic hardship, uncontrolled immigration and a strong anti-war sentiment.

The AfD and BSW based their election appeals on ending Germany’s huge military aid to Ukraine (over €23 billion, the second largest after the U.S.). They are also calling for an end to hostile economic sanctions against Russia and a return to normal, friendly relations between the two countries.

Both parties have also been critical of Berlin’s agreement to reinstall U.S. ballistic missiles on German soil – a return to Cold War days – which are aimed at Russia and which would make Germany a target for any Russian retaliation strikes. The way tensions are being ratcheted up by NATO in Ukraine and the invasion of Russia’s Kursk region such German fears are not far-fetched.

It seems obvious that the political revolt in the recent German elections was a strident protest against Berlin’s conformity with Washington’s anti-Russia policy.

Ironically, the German media mention this factor in the rise of the alternative parties, but their reports claim that the grievances are simply fueled by “Russian propaganda”. Talk about the political class being in denial. The people vote against the establishment’s policies and then the protest is dismissed as Kremlin manipulation. Such condescension only reinforces revolt.

So, we might ask, is it just Russian propaganda that the German economy is in crisis?

Germany’s Volkswagen announced this week that it is being compelled to consider drastic cost-saving measures. Mass layoffs of its 300,000 German workforce (nearly half of its global workforce) are on the cards. Not only that but the auto giant said it is looking at shutting down some of its factories to rein in crippling production costs. This would be the first time the company has ever considered plant closures in Germany in its 87-year history.

CEO Oliver Blume told the media the emergency retrenchment was about “costs, costs, costs”. He said the car manufacturer – one of the world’s largest and most iconic – was no longer competitive in pricing of its vehicles.

It’s hard to overstate the significance. Historically, the German economy – the biggest in Europe – has been driven by car exports to the rest of the world and in particular those of the Volkswagen group and its 10 car brands.

A vital part of the German economic success for decades was due to the supply of relatively cheap and abundant energy (gas and oil) from Russia – the world’s biggest supplier of hydrocarbon fuels.

Volkswagen bosses had warned two years ago that soaring energy costs were threatening the viability of their industry. And thereby, the viability of the entire German economy.

That warning in November 2022 came only weeks after the U.S. covertly blew up the Nord Stream gas pipelines under the Baltic Sea, thus severing Germany and the European Union from Russian energy supply. Combined with EU sanctions against other Russian energy supply routes, the result is a European economic recession. The German and European political elite have perversely followed the U.S. agenda of hostility towards Russia (using Ukraine as a proxy) – all for the Americans to boost their more expensive energy exports in place of Russia’s as well as boost the American military-industrial complex from unprecedented weapons sales.

Berlin has refused to carry out a proper criminal investigation into the sabotage of its Nord Stream gas pipes for the simple reason that it would expose the American perpetrators and in that way expose Berlin’s servile complicity. It has rebuffed Russian offers of cooperation, even though Russia and Germany were joint partners in the ambitious pipeline project that ran more than 1,222 kilometers under the Baltic Sea and took a decade to construct at the cost of €11 billion. If it had operated, Europe’s economies and households would have been guaranteed abundant affordable energy – not savage bill hikes.

It couldn’t be more tragic and farcical. America’s so-called European allies have willingly destroyed their own economic foundations through a treasonous adherence to Washington’s self-serving agenda. The irony is that the United States promotes itself as a “protector” of Europe when in reality it is nothing but a huge parasite living off European largesse and the foolishness of European governments serving as lapdogs for Uncle Sam.

War and DemocracyGottfried, PaulBest Price: $32.13Buy New $21.50(as of 12:01 UTC — Details)The countless American illegal wars that Europe has indulged for decades across the Middle East, Asia and Africa – and the latest proxy war in Ukraine, the largest in Europe since the Second World War – have created an intractable immigration crisis across Europe. This has again driven a furious political reaction whereby establishment parties in Germany, France and other EU states are being punished in the polls. The EU’s political crisis of shaky governments over uncontrolled immigration is a direct result of following America’s imperialist wars.

The EU establishment is a lapdog because it is part of the same Western imperialist order and mindset. It is ideologically programmed to follow – lemming-like – its own destruction. The revolving door of political and corporate careers as well as CIA blackmail against corrupt politicians are other factors.

The German people as with other European populations are finding out the hard way in their daily lives what it means for their so-called political class to be American vassals.

Volkswagen – the People’s Car Company – was created by German imperialism in 1937 under the Nazi Reich. The founding of the industry was a pet project of Adolf Hitler. The company’s early economic success was due to the use of cheap labour from concentration camps set up for the Final Solution, including the exploitation of slave labour from Russian POWs who were often worked to death. Today, VW is losing its prowess because it no longer benefits from access to cheap Russian gas.

Germany and its flagship industries are still a plaything of imperialism. This time, however, American imperialism is driving it to ruination.

The views of individual contributors do not necessarily represent those of the Strategic Culture Foundation.

Former editor and writer for major news media organizations. He has written extensively on international affairs, with articles published in several languages.

Copyright © Strategic Culture Foundation | Republishing is welcomed with reference to Strategic Culture online journal http://www.strategic-culture.su.

How the BANKS Created a Fake Race War: «The TRUTH About Lynching»-Shocking Untold History of 1917

How the banks, churches, school system, media and industries schemed to enslave all of the population… (this is probably one of the most important things I have written and the shortest too)

AGENT131711

While researching for my piece The History Hoax: How They Faked Historic Photographs, I came across a book called The Truth About Lynching and started reading it. 
I was surprised by what I was reading because it was quite different from the history I had been taught. 
People say “history is written by the victors”, but I think that is only partially true. 
I believe history is written by those with a financial interest in writing history and all that matters is shaping the narrative for future political and financial gain.

Before we get into this document, please remember it is over 100 years old. You may find some of the language to be outdated or even offensive but I think if we take a step back and look at the bigger picture, this is a mind-blowing history lesson that everyone should hear because in it you will learn how three industries took over the banks then forced black and white people to forever indebted to them. Then, to guarantee their stranglehold over the population, they created an artificial race war to sew division because they knew if the people united they will be outnumbered and conquered…

Upgrade to paid

Published in 1917, the document begins by explaining the purpose of lynching was to punish criminals, both black and white, for crimes of murder, rape, theft, attacking police officers and other serious charges. It goes on to say that although the media was spinning lynching as being rooted in racism, the truth was that out of 3,337 people lynched between 1822 — 1903, almost 1,200 of them had white skin.

The second fallacy the media was promoting was that the entire reason for lynching was the rape of white women however the current data proved only 1/3 of the lynchings were attributed to rape.

Additionally, as of 1917, the general populous, including Southern whites, did not like lynching but none of that mattered. What mattered was making sure the population believed white men were hunting non-whites because the belief of a race war was required for successful implementation of their plan.

Although interesting, those statistics were not the purpose of the creation of the publication. The reason the authors wrote the document was to look at how lynching began happening and more specifically, why — and this is what I found to be so compelling that I wanted to share it with you.

THE TAKEOVER OF THE BANKS

Leading up to 1917, several industries controlled the United States. The Eastern and Western states were dominated by railroads and steamships whereas the Southern states were primarily farming and goods production.

In the South, three main industries were in power: the cotton industry, the lumber industry and the turpentine industry (turpentine is made from pine tree resin). Let’s call these “The Big 3”. These three produced the vast majority of the income that funded the banks in the Southern states. Because the banks relied on their monies, like puppet masters, these industries controlled what the banks did. Because of their dominance over the financial institutions The Big 3 also controlled both political parties, which controlled the appointment of law enforcement sheriffs. This gave The Big 3 complete control over the South which lead to the creation of a scheme to “exploit human labor-power and the natural resources of the country for private profits”.

THE SCHEME TO ENSLAVE THE SOUTH

It’s a brilliant scheme; beyond diabolical, but nonetheless, brilliant. Remember, being evil doesn’t mean they are foolish. Unfortunately, the majority of the most evil amongst us are also of high-level intelligence.

A major part of the plan was to create a job shortage. One of the steps taken to accomplish this was importing black men into the South. These black men were unknowing victims of the scheme, only brought in to create employment scarcity. They were providing these imported men with jobs currently held by poor white men. In desperation, the men who were having their livelihoods destroyed at a time of employment scarcity, fought back by shooting the imported men, then the media reported it as hate crimes due to skin color while never stating the real reason behind the massacre. The author points out that black men would have done the same if the roles were reversed, for it was never about race, it was about survival.

While men were being ushered in to upend society, laws were created to imprison black people who had no way to financially support themselves. With more people than jobs, the result was large quantities of black people being rounded up and imprisoned. And this is where The Big 3 industries swooped in to “help”.

The cotton, lumber and turpentine industries would pay the fines needed to free the incarcerated men but since they were poor they were remanded into the custody of the industries where they had to repay the fines by laboring.

The Big 3 were sure to pay such a trivial wage that there was no possible way the fines could ever be repaid. Additionally, they required the laborers to sign “non-performance” contracts, which meant if the men didn’t work to the fullest they would be arrested and charged with theft. It was deemed theft because, at the time, nonrepayment of a loan was considered to be the same as stealing. Stealing resulted in imprisonment and lynching. It was a vicious cycle with no way out. Meanwhile, the crop-lien system was installed.

THE CROP LIEN SYSTEM

Poor farmers, both black and white, were getting absolutely f*cked by the banks, which were controlled by The Big 3. The farmers were so broke that they needed financial assistance to begin planting but could repay at time of harvest, so the banks and The Big 3 schemed to allow them to mortgage their crop, but the mortgage terms were so ridiculous that no matter how bountiful the harvest the poor farmers could never get out of debt to the bank. With interest rates as high as 100% on the dollar, eventually the crop-lien system would lead to the farmer losing control of his farm… or worse, nonrepayment was considered theft and theft was punishable by lynching. This meant there would be a farm, built by a poor black or poor white family, now owned by the bank, forcing freed prisoners to indefinitely work on it to repay fines that could never be repaid. The ultimate goal was to make peasants out of both races, and it worked. The author writes, black people “and poor whites don’t unite — unite against a common exploiter — because race prejudice exists and is artfully cultivated to keep them apart”.

CONTROL THE SUPPLIES

The next pillar in the plan was to control the supplies therefore manipulating the price of the supplies. “Just as prices are extortionate when the land is filled with plenty, because those who control the supplies of certain goods corner them and only put upon the open market a supply about commensurate with the demand”.

THE MASSIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATION (PSYOP)

As mentioned previously, the Big 3 controlled the banks therefore they controlled both the Republican and Democrat politicians and the two parties were who appointed the sheriffs. This meant it was The Big 3, by proxy, who wrote the laws, elected the sheriffs to enforce them, extorted poor black and white farmers to steal their land and forced labor on them, then they would shape the issues caused by their actions as political and use the issues to further divide the people. It was the political parties, not the people, that created the anti-black, anti-labor legislation in the South. “Political parties in the South, as in the North, are extra-legal (illegal) organizations composed of citizens who are controlled by moneyed interests”, the author writes.

While the press ran headline after headline about lynching and race riots, the church was receiving large contributions from The Controllers, meaning The Big 3. Sermons became a for-profit business and preachers preached the messages ordered by those who held the purse strings. This lead to The First Methodist Church becoming split; Northern church-goers could not understand why the Southern branch of their church was rooting for a system of enslavement and praising the Cotton Kings every Sunday. The answer was not because the people coming to worship wanted race wars, nor did the people want enslavement of black people or farms stolen from their fellow citizens, it was because the Southern church was captured… and this played perfectly into the media PSYOP.

To make matters worse, evil bought-and-paid black political leaders in the South were in on the PSYOP. Black citizens were discovering that they could relocate to the Northern, Eastern or Western states and make at least minimum wage, which was currently $2.50 per day, but many businesses outside of the South were paying $3.50 — $12 a day pre-1917 because the economy was in need of reliable laborers. This presented a fantastic opportunity for black people as well as poor whites in the South to get the hell out of there and break free from The Big 3. To prevent black people from leaving to better their lives, black leaders who were part of the PSYOP promoted a catchy new message to “Stay South”. These leaders, who had great influence over the African American community, encouraged black people to continue in the system of indefinite enslavement. Just like our current day Big Pharma that profits off poisoning trusting people, these diabolical black leaders were referred to as Big Negro; they too profited off harm caused to the people who trusted their advice the most. These leaders, who were promoted in the media as good, strong, honest, black men, told black people to remain in the only states which currently oppressed them. At the time, black people were not allowed to vote in these states therefore they would pay into a system for which they had no say over and no way out of. Black people were given no voice in the South because it had to be that way, for if they were given a platform to speak, the people would learn the truth and rise up together to overthrow The Controllers, so instead, these leaders encouraged their people to stay in a place where they were producing wealth in exchange for starvation wages, working for the same men who lynched them. The Stay South “is the most hypocritical, dishonest and dishonorable council which their bosses have ever hired them to give out”, writes the author.

Meanwhile, other black political leaders, such as Dr. Du Bois, encouraged black people to kill white people. “The Negroes should have prevented that lynching, if they had killed every white man in the country…”, said Du Bois. The author of this document comments, “…Such advice would not seem to emanate from a sane mind — not to mention a sincere heart.”

But it wasn’t just the Big 3, the banks, the sheriffs, the powerful black political leaders, black and white preachers, the press and the church who were in on the PSYOP. The educational system did its part to intentionally stoke the flames of racism. One tactic the school system used to fuel the fire was educational appropriations. The system appropriated only $2.22 per year for black students and only $4.92 per year for white students. Clearly this was hurtful both mentally and educationally for black people, but both sides failed to see the bigger picture which was that neither of those amounts were near-appropriate for an annual education of a child. Whether it be $2 or $4, it was only enough money per student to ensure both black and white children would not receive the education they needed to become smart enough and brave enough to question the system they intentionally were trapped inside. The low dollar amounts were only enough to further the racism agenda; divide and conquer. The lack of educational funding was to produce a surplus of unskilled laborers who were destined to become indebted to the system. “Education of Negroes and whites is a solvent key, for prejudice is born of ignorance and blind hate”.

UNITY THROUGH TRUTH

The author points out that the majority of white people did not want lynching (despite what the media was saying) and goes on to remind readers that slavery was abolished when white people stood up to it, therefore to abolish lynching, the races must unite. He reminds readers that when nearly 800 white men were first lynched, it was viewed as a white problem so black men did nothing because we, as people, have been manipulated into only seeing the need for change when it is us being effected. Then, when black people began being lynched and white lynching began to diminish, it was seen as a black problem and this time around white men did nothing. At the time of publishing this document the author wrote, “the pendulum is swinging again and ten to twelve whites are being lynched a year now”, his point being, murder is not a white problem nor a black problem, it is a problem, a grave injustice, that all people must fight against, period. A mob of angry men should never have the liberty to take a fellow mans life under the guise of justice.

The author goes on to point out that this system of oppression is not an issue only impacting blacks, it is also greatly impoverishing whites because when a black man is forever indebted to the scheme and is forced to work for starvation wages, why would the company hire a white man? Due to the rigged system driving down the cost of labor, you end up with one race working for free and the other unemployed. At the end of the day you have both races are starving to death, stuck is a system of oppression where there are no opportunities. You see, the system was intricately designed to destroy everyone while getting man to point the blame at his fellow mans skin pigmentation instead of seeing the blame should be placed on those who created the system: the banks, The Big 3 and their Controllers.

This 1917 document was written by A. Philip Randolph and Chandler Owen:

I hope that 107 years later, I was able to share their message in a way they would have been proud of. Thank you, my brothers, for spreading a message of wisdom, peace, unity and encouragement to all people. And thank you for taking the time to record history so over a century later a cartoon agent can share it with people of all pigmentations who are on the same mission you were, spreading truth.

https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/how-the-banks-created-a-race-war

Freemasons & Illuminati: the Battle for the PRESS and Censorship of the 1800s (Untold History)Масоны и иллюминаты: битва за ПРЕССУ и цензуру 1800-х годов (Нерассказанная история)

Not «conspiracy theory», this information is from government records from 1830. A True story of how the media was captured and wielded as a weapon against the people…Не «теория заговора», эта информация взята из правительственных документов 1830 года. Правдивая история о том, как СМИ были захвачены и использовались как оружие против народа…

AGENT131711AGENT131711

Although Freemasonry claims to have existed essentially since the beginning of time, even claiming to have books written by Hermes (yes, the Greek Mythology Hermes), researchers of the early 1800s could only trace evidence of Masonry back to the early 1700s. “By cunning and falsehood of the craft… (the Masons) led a portion of the world to believe that their institution was very ancient, scientific, moral, charitable, divine and religious; patronized by all the patriarchs, prophets, wise men, and saints of old… and that it was a greater blessing upon mankind than any other institution on earth; even greater than the Christian religion.”, they wrote.

In 1730, a little over a dozen years after the official formation of the Freemasons, one of its members, Samuel Prichard, defected and fully disclosed all of the secrets of the fraternity. At the time, the Masonic organization was a small, fringe group so nobody cared and Prichard’s warnings of the dangers of this entity fell on deaf ears. The researchers of the 1800s write, “no one supposed that an organization so insignificant and unworthy of notice, was ever to become so extensive and powerful as to revolutionize kingdoms, cause the most potent monarchs to tremble upon their thrones, and even to defy “the world in arms””.

A handful of years later another warning, “Jachin and Boaz”, was released by a different defector. The author of this work, as well as those who published it in America, were assassinated. Despite the warnings and murders, most of the public still considered the organization to be a joke. In London, “Young lads frequently appeared in the streets of London, clad in aprons, and adorned with pebles, in mimicry of a class of men, whom they considered supremely ridiculous”.

The mockery didn’t detour the Masons. Their numbers slowly grew. The principals of the order were transplanted into France, Germany and other kingdoms in Europe and had begun to take a deep and extensive root in America. The French Revolutionary war, a time of complete upheaval in France, was both a catalyst for the organization and a time of Awakening for many members. While distraught men, angered by war, joined under the belief that they were going to discover answers in the form of enlightenment, grow their relationship with God and be an asset in their communities, many who were already embedded in the organization saw clearly the goals of the Masons. During the so-called French revolution, “some had the sagacity to discern that this deluge of human blood and the subsequent anarchy of that nation resulted not so much from the true spirit of national liberty, as from the principles of infidelity extensively propagated in every country of Europe, by means of secret associations.” — the people were already beginning to see the war was not what it seemed and the shadowy entity, operating in secrecy behind lodge doors, just might be a massive f*cking problem.

Although many were brave enough to abandon the fraternity, few were willing to speak out, for all knew the punishment should they break their oath to the brotherhood. Among those who risked their lives to expose the secrets of the Masons was Abbe Barruel and Professor Robison. Both men were deeply involved with the Freemasons and extensively acquainted with the secrets of the craft.

Professor Robison said, “I have observed these doctrines gradually diffusing and mixing with all the different systems of freemasonry, till at last, an association had been formed, for the express purpose of rooting out all the religious establishments and overturning all the existing governments of Europe”. He added, “In short, we may assert with confidence that the mason lodges in France were the hot-beds where the seeds were sown and tenderly reared, of all the pernicious doctrines which soon choked every moral or religious cultivation and have made society worse than a waste, have made it into a marsh of human corruption, filled with every rank and poisonous weed”. According to Robison, this is what gave rise to the Illuminati and the Illuminees.

Abbe Barruel and Professor Robison saw the organization as such a danger that they began publishing different works on the topic. Their work Awakened many. An official countermovement against the masons had been set in motion, and this time around, some were interested. Surprisingly, even British Parliament took interest. They passed an act that prohibited no more than three degrees of masonry being conferred in any lodge in the kingdom and provided a statute against the administration of extra-judicial oaths. This statute meant that, providing the law is followed, no member of government could also be a Freemason.

When the Professor and Barruel’s works began being read in America, “many intelligent men, both civilians and divines, were awakened to impending danger, filled with fearful apprehensions in the view of the rapid growth of Freemasonry and sounded the alarm both from the pulpit and the forum.”. This is what lead to the war of the press…

The Illumnees in France and Germany were already actively engaged in psychological warfare via the press. When multiple news columns were speaking ill of them, they formed slandering committees throughout the countries. The Masons in America followed suit; anyone who dared to speak against the brotherhood would be vilified, their character assassinated. The accusations didn’t need to be truthful, they simply needed to permanently destroy the credibility of the defector and anyone aiding in the publication of the materials.

When Robison’s writings appeared in American publications, a news column appeared in a paper printed in Hartford, Connecticut. It informed readers that Robison “had lived too fast for his income, and to supply deficiencies, has undertaken to alter a bank bill”. It stated that when Robison was caught committing fraud by altering the bill he fled to France where he participated in a Lodge. The news column claimed that Robison was expelled from the lodge, so he went to a different lodge and applied for membership but was denied. Desperately longing to be a Mason, the professor then went to Germany and Russia, but never succeeded at gaining membership, and this is what drove Robison to “the bitterest hatred for masonry”, resulting in him making up these awful, untrue claims about the brotherhood. The paper went on to say that his book (the anti-mason book) was nothing more than a way to escape his crime of fraud. They claimed Robison presented his book to the government to have the charges against him dropped in exchange for his knowledge. The column ends by saying, “He now lives upon a handsome pension”, leading the reader to believe that either a payment from the government for his information, or sales from his book, were so lucrative he was able to retire wealthy. — Of course, not a word of this was true. There never were charges against Robison. By all accounts, he was an honorable man, respected by his colleagues, many of which spoke publicly of his favorable character during the slanderous attacks.

In another hit piece against the professor, the same false allegations of forgery were made. This time around, they upped the ante by labeling him insane. The Masons had these columns copied into other papers (mockingbird media 1.0), and it was only a matter of time before the professor became known as a dishonest basket case and the colleagues who came to his defense were considered to be birds of a feather. All of these lunatics were the conspiracy theorists of the time and all should be laughed at and ignored.

Shortly after the Robison debacle, a professor at Yale College prepared an abstract from Barruel’s work, which he sent for publication in the Connecticut Curant newspaper, also printed in Hartford. The paper published a total of eight of the Yale teachers abstracts, then suddenly he was blocked from submitting further content and the eight articles would never be republished.

The same year, Reverend Dr. Morse of Charlestown, a highly respected and very well-known man from Massachusetts, preached and published a sermon in which he pointed out the dangers of Illuminism and the rapid and powerful influence which it was obtaining in America. He expressed the importance of the American people to open their eyes to impending evils. The Reverend recommended people read “Proof of a Conspiracy”. Due to the great reputation of Reverend Dr. Morse, the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts stepped up to run damage control. He penned several pieces for the American Mercury newspaper, none of which refuted the knowledge of the preacher, but instead attacked his character.

When the Grand Master’s articles appeared in the Mercury, a brave and moral judge, Honorable Samuel Dexter of Boston, stepped up to defend Reverend Dr. Morse. The judge wrote a scathing article as a response to the Grand Master, but the Mercury refused to publish it. The controversy continued until, eventually, a writer in the Mercury stated, “Dr. Morse has been censured as being unfriendly to masonry” and informed readers that anti-masonic writings were being banned from appearing in the paper.

Another writer in the same paper stated that the articles the Masons were publishing were skillfully crafted to create suspicion against those who spoke out against the fraternity. “Why should they be so determined to extinguish the light which is shed upon this subject, unless they considered the masonic institution as having an intimate connection with illuminism”. As expected, this was immediately followed by a rebuttal stating the Illuminati are the genuine philosophists. The researchers of the 1800s wrote, “…one principal mode of masonic warfare, and the most efficient means, adopted by the masonic fraternity, to suppress the work of investigation, has been a thoroughly organized system of slander and calumny”

THE PRESS AS OF 1830

As of 1830, researchers reported, there were a total of 983 aggregate newspapers. They divided them into three classes:

  • free press publishing nonbiased news and founded on the opposition to masonry
  • 100% controlled masonic press
  • and the third class was papers that publish both types of content; nonbiased, anti-mason and masonic-controlled.

Researchers of that time discovered that only 124 of the papers were anti-masonic and unbiased. The remaining 859 newspapers were either partially or fully controlled by the Freemasons. COMING NEXT: Anti-Masons vs Everybody: The Rise of the Anti-Masonic Party in the United States

Black Swans, Orchestrated Chaos and November 5

An Electoral System Built for Cheating

By Elizabeth Nickson
Welcome to Absurdistan

September 9, 2024

donate 

FacebookTwitter

True the Vote the first citizen voter integrity group in the 21st century, was started by Catherine Engelbrecht in 2009. At the time, she had been managing a manufacturing plant that supplied parts to the oil and gas industry in Texas for eleven years. Interviewed last month Patriots with Grit, she explained, I had never been interested in politics, but after ‘09, I found government was everywhere, my kids school, health care, oil and gas, regulations out of control. How could citizens engage?”

Engelbrecht hasn’t been out of court one day since 09, and the pretty blond country club woman today has the stripped down looks of a real fighter.

“We took so much for granted. So I decided to get involved. They needed poll workers? Ok. So a bunch of us signed up for poll watching. Most of the elections were fine, but 25% of the group came back to say, you would not believe what we saw.”

They saw voters who were told their vote had already been cast. They saw people come in and say, “I can’t remember who I am supposed to vote for”, and the election judge would walk them over to the machines and coach them.

“Then, a group who came into town who said they were going to register a massive number of new voters. We investigated, caught them and turned them over to the county.

“We started True the Vote, and soon enough people from all over the country were calling us to say, ‘Hey, we heard you are doing this kind of work, can we work with you?’ That was the beginning.

Within two months I’d been sued twice and over the next 18 months, I went through 23 audits and investigations by five different government agencies and it didn’t stop until I spoke before Congress. I sued the IRS in 2013, beat them in 2019, and the whole undercurrent of election integrity went forward, and in 2019, I began to hear about changes to process.

Engelbrecht is working with hundreds of thousands of voters now, in precincts all across the country, at the ground level. She and her team have developed tools for citizens to use to check the voter rolls. She has 35,000 volunteers working on just one of the apps below, IV3, and at any one time, 7,000 people are on line helping voters.

work 16 hour days, six days a week, and I don’t see an end to it.

“In 2019, the rip cord was pulled and everything you could possibly imagine, from the half a billion from Mark Zuckerburg directly to counties to put in drop boxes, to the disregard of the standards that afforded us a check and balance in the process. All of that occurred in this perfect storm, and so many new people woke up. They came to the national stage and said, hey, we are seeing things that don’t make sense.

“Since then, millions of Americans have woken up”, says Engelbrecht, “and many of them are involved at the county and precinct level.”

True the Vote has been running strategy sessions across the country for years.

The Black Swan of All Black Swans

Migrant voting, says Engelbrecht, is shaping up to be the Black Swan event of the 2024 election, much like Covid was for 2020. Between 10 and 27% of the flood of migrants arrived since 2021 are already registered to vote. The lowest estimate of illegal migrants across the southern border is of about eleven million, which means about 1.2 million to 2.5 million additions to the voter rolls. As Absurdistan has shown several times – see below – these “registered voters” are used to manufacture ballots which are slid into the process during the days or even weeks-long adjudication process that follows election day.

[At the bottom of this piece, all the election stories will be linked, and you will begin to have at least an outline of what happened and what is likely to happen next.}

The migrant flood onto the voter rolls had been planned for decades, and was put into action at the beginning of 1993 in the U.S.. Nor was it just planned for the U.S., It was effected across all the left-of-centre parties in western democracies in a targeted approach to weaken laws and provide access to taxpayer funds for migrants. And, through social services agencies, access to voter registration. All meant to bulk out votes for the left.

Political operatives in Britain claim that in 1998, Tony Blair did the same thing: loosen and traduce immigration law in order to let in migrants who will vote left, or whose votes can be used. The process is simple. Among immigrant communities, a natural leader is chosen who works with government to sort out benefits, housing, schooling, money, medical care. He bundles the votes for the left, because the right will stop the gravy train. I have watched this happening in my region, which is thick with innocent immigrants at the mercy of grim political operatives wearing smiley faces. It is easy peasy to pull the wool over their eyes. This, by the way, is how the white man screwed the indigenous. Choose and elevate a malleable chief, and extract every resource you can. Beads and trinkets, it’s the same game.

“In 1993, the first bill that Clinton signed in office was the National Voter Registration Act, which required that all social services programs have as a component, mechanisms by which to register clients to vote. You’ll probably remember the Motor Voter Act,” says Engelbrecht, which was the noisy shorthand for this move on the chessboard.

One of Obama’s first acts in office in 2009 extended social services programs, once only available to American citizens, to the undocumented. They were then registered to vote. Biden’s first act in office in 2021 was to issue an executive order making it a priority for all social service agencies to increase voter registration. The entire vast network of social services began to staff up in anticipation of what was planned at the border.

“We can’t know who’s a citizen and who’s not. How can we separate the two categories? They never have separated them. Biden started something called CBP1. You can start your asylum petition from anywhere in the world. The feds have the database of those people and they won’t share it with us. If the states could say, ‘Hey these people are being given housing and drivers licenses, and work permits, and all of that comes with voter registration. Who are they?’ But the federal government won’t give them the names.”

The Democrats say that migrants won’t vote because “it’s illegal”.

“The whole thing is illegal,” says Engelbrecht. “Their entry is illegal. They are almost all economic migrants, not refugees. The breakdown at the border is illegal. The Democrats want migrants to vote. They stood in lockstep against the Republicans in support of non-citizen voting. The Democrats say that non-citizens can’t vote.”

This is nonsense. As many as 30% – 3,300,000 – have already been registered to vote. Remember, by my calculation, and the calculation of others closer to the coal face, the swing states were stolen for Biden in the lower mid-six-figures. The migrants may not go to the polls, but their votes will be entered. The migrants themselves do not have to vote. As described in detail here, their registration will be used by the NGO’s who fill out ballots during the chaos period.

In the late hours of November 5, once the machines, connected to the internet, demonstrate how many votes are needed to take the election for the Democrats, the NGOs start filling out the ballots which are, one way or another, slid into the process. The Parallel Election by Greg Stenstrom and Laura Hoopes, in the pivot country, Delaware, in Pennsylvania, describes using the sworn testimony of eye-witnesses, just how hundreds of thousands of ballots were moved into process, even moving pallets up and down elevator stacks to confuse observers, and over-written thumb drives. The book, as its subtitle says, is the blueprint for deception.

Read the Whole Article

Copyright © Elizabeth Nickson

Создайте подобный сайт на WordPress.com
Начало работы