The Problem Isn’t the US Having the Wrong President, the Problem Is the US Empire’s Existence

The reason I find myself fighting with both Harris supporters and Trump supporters is because they see the other party as the problem while I see the US empire itself as the problem.

By Caitlin Johnstone
CaitlinJohnstone.com

The reason I find myself fighting with both Harris supporters and Trump supporters is because they see the other party as the problem while I see the US empire itself as the problem. They seek to make things better by ensuring that the empire is under the correct management, while I seek the end of the empire.

❖

People say things like “Oh but Kamala Harris speaks so compassionately about the suffering of the Palestinians!”JOHNSTONE April 24: Bi…Foley, Timothy PBest Price: $30.41Buy New $18.00(as of 06:47 UTC — Details)

These dupes had eight years of Obama speaking eloquent, compassionate-sounding words while continuing and expanding all of Bush’s ugliest policies, and they still haven’t learned the lesson here.

❖

Call me naive but I am truly, legitimately shocked that the Democrats are running on such a warmongering platform instead of pretending to stand for peace this election season. Between the new party platform attacking Trump for not starting a war with Iran, Harris talking about having the “most lethal fighting force in the world” and pledging to protect US interests from “Iran and Iran-backed terrorists”, this is the kind of campaign you’d expect to see from an ultrahawk Republican like Tom Cotton or John Bolton. But those Republican warmongers are not popular enough within their own party to secure its nomination.

I really was not expecting the Democrats to be campaigning like this. Certainly I was expecting them to GOVERN as extreme warmongers like Biden has been, but to sell the American people on it on their actual election platform is really surprising. Usually they put a lot of effort into campaigning as the responsible adults in the room; instead they’re openly going all Dr Strangelove and yeehawing on the bomb. There’s normally a lot more distance between who Democrats are and who they pretend to be.

It’s so wild because they’re just handing Trump another easy “vote for me I’m the peace candidate” campaign like they did when they lost in 2016. All they need to do is lie and say they’ll bring about peace, and instead they’re practically campaigning on starting a war with Iran.

❖

What an insane, backwards headline. Like the normal expectation is that an American political party will not run a presidential candidate as it has every election since 1996, and the self-evident fact that it will run a candidate is the scandalous news story that needs reporting. https://t.co/H2ZYKp03nU

— Caitlin Johnstone (@caitoz) August 24, 2024

This “Jill Stein needs to drop out” nonsense is so tedious and stupid. Democrats literally JUST saw what happens when your party’s candidate drops out: they’re replaced with another candidate. That’s what would happen if Stein dropped out. If you don’t think third parties should be allowed to exist in America, just say that. Don’t invent some fictional alternate reality universe where Jill Stein emerges out of nowhere every few years to steal votes from Democrats like some villain in a video game and where getting rid of her would get you those votes back.

Stein shows up as a presidential candidate because she’s the most popular candidate in a political party Americans created because they wanted that party to exist. Your argument isn’t with Jill Stein, it’s with Americans who don’t like your shitty imperialist political party. Either convince them that war and injustice are awesome or stop being such murderous tyrants.

❖

The more you accuse me of supporting Trump for criticizing the sitting administration’s genocidal atrocities and warmongering, the more you demonstrate to me that you have no real values and that you support Democrats for the same reasons you support your favorite sports team.Woke: A Field Guide Fo…Johnstone, CaitlinBest Price: $20.37Buy New $23.02(as of 10:35 UTC — Details)

❖

When it comes to fomenting leftist revolutionary sentiment, Harris, not Trump, seems like the preferred accelerationist candidate. A lot of young people became politically aware during the Trump years, and therefore thought the Democrats were on their side. It wasn’t until Biden got in and started committing genocide that their eyes were opened to the evils of the Democratic Party. If Trump gets in the Democrats will get to go back to playing the good guys again, while if Harris gets in she appears poised to unleash some major nastiness on the world in front of a bunch of newly emerging leftists who recently had their eyes opened to the murderousness of the empire by what Biden has been doing in Gaza.

I’m not endorsing revolutionary accelerationism here. I’m just saying if you are an accelerationist on the left then that’s probably the direction you’d prefer to see things to go.

❖

I’ve been banned from TikTok for my “Vote For Six-Headed Zombie Hitler To Stop Seven-Headed Zombie Hitler” video about lesser-evil voting. Please follow my new account there.

_______________

My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece here are some options where you can toss some money into my tip jar if you want to. Go here to find video versions of my articles. If you’d prefer to listen to audio of these articles, you can subscribe to them on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Soundcloud or YouTube. Go here to buy paperback editions of my writings from month to month. All my work is free to bootleg and use in any way, shape or form; republish it, translate it, use it on merchandise; whatever you want. The best way to make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. All works co-authored with my husband Tim Foley.

Copyright © Caitlin Johnstone

The Problem Isn’t the US Having the Wrong President, the Problem Is the US Empire’s Existence

Everyone Hates Fascism Except the Government

By J.B. Shurk
American Thinker

One of the few interesting things about America’s highly choreographed political conventions is the gathering of people outside these events. Supporters and protesters show up to yell at the top of their lungs for days. What kinds of taunts do these opposing groups scream at each other? Remarkably, they accuse each other of similar transgressions. Probably the most common insults being lobbed from each side of the political spectrum are accusations that the other side is full of “fascists,” “Nazis,” and “racists.”

It’s enough to make an observer wonder whether an awkward kumbaya truce could spontaneously break out, in which antagonistic foes raise a curious eyebrow and timidly ask, “You mean, you’re against fascism and racism, too?” before taking off their masks, throwing down their cardboard signs, and apprehensively shaking hands.  Of course, that never happens, so very angry Americans continue to denounce one another in nearly identical terms.War, Christianity, and…Laurence M. VanceBest Price: $8.95Buy New $9.95(as of 09:10 UTC — Details)

The whole thing would be funny if it were not so serious.  And it’s serious because the resulting confusion leaves Americans who might otherwise agree about an awful lot instead reaching for one another’s throats.  The more time they waste fighting, the easier it is for their real enemies to get away with all kinds of mischief without anyone noticing.  Who are their “real enemies”?  Well, regardless of any American’s particular ideological beliefs, those who most affect their lives (outside their families and friends) are almost certainly people with wealth and power — and not the vast majority of their working-class neighbors just trying to earn a living.  Because wealth and power remain in the hands of a small collection of political and financial “elites,” they benefit when citizens with neither wealth nor power choose to attack one another.

Another way to think of this is to ask a simple question: what is the greatest threat to any political system?  Is it the threat of foreign invasion?  Economic depression?  Disease?  Of course not.  It is the possibility that those controlled by the system will overthrow those doing the controlling.  Every government in the world — communist dictatorship, theocratic regime, or so-called constitutional republic — claims to be working for the people.  But when the “elites” of those governments speak behind closed doors, their efforts are directed toward subduing the people.  Governments invest in the illusion that their power is limitless and that the people have no other choice but to obey.  Whenever common people recognize that they are the ones with inherent power, the government’s illusion of control is shattered, the system is upended, and a new era with novel organizing principles arrives.

Seen through this lens, it is easy to understand why governments have a vested interest in stirring up domestic conflict.  A peaceful and well mannered society might engage in respectful debate and start asking serious questions, such as: why should private central banks be allowed to print money and devalue personal savings?  Why should America be financially squeezed by a bunch of multinational corporations that use cheap labor overseas and bully small businesses into bankruptcy here at home?  Why should foreign investment houses own so much land and property in America when fewer Americans than ever before can afford to own a home?  When government authorities use outside companies to censor Americans’ speech and spy on their private activities, do such workarounds really trump the Bill of Rights?  When corporations work hand in glove with government bureaucrats to track and police citizens, hasn’t our system of government transformed into something we would have once recognized as classically fascist?The Anti-Globalist Man…Corsi, Jerome R.Best Price: $26.58Buy New $23.74(as of 04:14 UTC — Details)

These important questions and others might lead common citizens to think more clearly about their government’s priorities before arriving at another uncomfortable question: does the government really represent the people’s interests, or does it represent the interests of its corporate partners?  Such discussions threaten to shatter any government’s well-guarded illusion of control.

The political system can’t have that, so the corporate news media blast out daily reminders that “racism” and “extremism” are the real threats to peace and prosperity.  On television and on social media sites, the message is clear: trust the government but distrust your neighbors.  If everybody is more worried about Donald Trump’s personality or Taylor Swift’s political endorsements, nobody has time to wonder how we’ve reached the point when the federal government’s fiscal burden consumes 93% of America’s total accumulated wealth since its founding or how global debt now exceeds $315 trillion.  The wealthiest and most powerful people in the West take from everyone else and then set society on fire with engineered division and hate.  They are civil arsonists committed to destroying the evidence of all the damage they’ve wrought.

Read the Whole Article

Copyright © American Thinker

Everyone Hates Fascism Except the Government

Media Claims Elon Musk Is A Threat To Democracy – But Is “Democracy” Even Worth Saving?

By Brandon Smith

Alt-Market.us

There is perhaps nothing more tiresome and embarrassing as the theatrical pearl clutching of leftist media propaganda. For three years the public had to deal with the incessant drone of media fear mongering over the covid pandemic, an event which turned out to be a nothing-burger that 99.8% of the population on average would easily survive. After the 2020 elections we have been inundated with narratives about how conservatives are a “threat to democracy” – A democracy which progressives don’t even believe in as the recent DNC coup against Joe Biden proves.

The latest evolution of the democracy narrative is that free speech (and probably Russia) is the root evil behind civil unrest in western countries. The notion of thought crime is making its way to the forefront of the establishment tool box and this suggests we are entering the next stage of authoritarianism – Open criminalization of speech.Democracy u2013 The Go…Hans-Hermann HoppeBest Price: $24.77Buy New $37.61(as of 09:25 UTC — Details)

The Guardian in the UK is fully onboard with this development. The media outlet is on the warpath against Elon Musk and X (formerly known as Twitter) after Musk defied European and UK officials and their demands for censorship. In an article titled ‘Inciting Rioters In Britain Was A Test Run For Elon Musk. Just See What He Plans For America’, the platform launches into a tirade of delusional progressive talking points, a word salad designed to distract from the reality that what they are actually calling for is the death of free speech.

The Guardian argues:

“…Back in the golden days of 2020, tech platforms, still reeling from a public backlash, had at least to look as if they gave a shit. Twitter employed 4,000-plus people in “trust and safety”, tasked with getting dangerous content off its platform and sniffing out foreign influence operations.”

“In Britain, the canary has sung. This summer we have witnessed something new and unprecedented. The billionaire owner of a tech platform publicly confronting an elected leader and using his platform to undermine his authority and incite violence. Britain’s 2024 summer riots were Elon Musk’s trial balloon…”

“The presidential election is three months away. What if the billionaire contests the result? What if he decides democracy is overrated…?”

“…What Musk – the new self-appointed Lord of Misrule – has done is to rip off the mask. He’s shown that you don’t even have to pretend to care. In Musk’s world, trust is mistrust and safety is censorship. His goal is chaos. And it’s coming.”

The most important question that The Guardian and their leftist ilk never address is this: If a democracy relies on mass censorship and thought crime policies in order to function, if it relies on “protecting” the public from unfortunate truths, then is it really worth saving?

I and millions of other would argue no – It’s not worth saving. That “democracy” is broken and corrupt and should be wiped from the face of the Earth before it destroys the very culture it claims to protect.

The political left continues to prove it is emotionally stunted and frantic, relying on lies and self-induced terror to drive its base of supporters forward on the path the gatekeepers (globalists) prefer. If you’ve ever tried to reason with a screaming toddler hellbent on getting what it wants, then you know what it’s like trying to reason with leftists.

The hyper-emotion of the left is an easy lever for the elites to manipulate, and it’s not relegated to the US. We’ve seen the same trend in Europe and the UK. There’s an accelerating panic in Britain as the working class public (most of them patriots) protested in large numbers across the nation against open borders. Almost 70% of the UK populace is against current policies on mass immigration, specifically from the third-world. The Brexit vote was based primarily on the UK public’s opposition to the forced mass immigration agenda of the EU.

Yet, the self-described “defenders” of democracy have no interest in the public voice. They only care about majority concerns if those concerns run parallel to their agenda.

This refusal to take public concerns on third-world migrants seriously, combined with the ongoing two-tier policing system which seeks to hide migrant crime statistics, has led directly to the protests and riots we have seen this past month. Let’s be clear: It’s government officials in the UK that are to blame for the violence. They are the culprits.

The same goes for the riots of January 6th, an event which started out peaceful and was then triggered to react violently after Capitol police began shooting the crowd with rubber bullets and throwing tear gas grenades into their midst. You can only poke the bear for so long before the bear wakes up and claws your face off.

Of course, when the bear does attack, play the victim and be sure not to tell anyone how you provoked it. It’s the kind of gaslighting conservatives and patriots have been dealing with for the duration and the latest events in the UK suggest it’s not going to end anytime soon.

The Guardian is, in a way, testing the waters of totalitarianism by moving away from the old-school rationale of the “greater good.” They touch on it briefly, but their core argument here is that the system is sacrosanct no matter how corrupt it might be. Those in power and their policies cannot be criticized or protested because, well, they are the elites and we just have to trust that they know what’s best for us.

If we interfere with them in any way, collapse will befall us and chaos will reign supreme. And we don’t want that, now, do we?

Maybe we do. Maybe it’s time for the system as it stands today to go down. Maybe we should stop allowing the beneficiaries of the two-tiers system to hide behind the thin veneer of democracy. After all, their version of democracy is simply incremental tyranny. They’ve proven this is the end game in the UK (in case anyone had previous doubts).Choosing Easy World: A…Rogers Hamrick, JuliaBest Price: $9.54Buy New $11.40(as of 07:10 UTC — Details)

At bottom, it’s not the job of Big Tech conglomerates or government officials to police public speech. Their positions are entirely predicated on their ability to serve the public interest and this includes ALL of the public, not just progressives. From what I have seen so far, Elon Musk’s defiance is a natural reaction to incompatible government. Musk is a symptom of a greater movement, not the cause.

The gatekeepers want to make it all about one man, or a handful of men. They want you to focus on Musk, or Trump, because they don’t want to admit the truth: That the real threat they want to neutralize is YOU, along with millions of other conservatives and independents. You are the great danger to their agenda.

If a specific political leadership is not able to offer a good argument as to why they should exist, then maybe they shouldn’t. If a system needs to be replaced, then it will be and there’s nothing that progressive hand-wringers and globalists from Davos can do about it. They are not necessary. They are not the future. They are only holding us back.

Reprinted with permission from Alt-Market.us.

The Best of Brandon Smith

Brandon Smith [send him mail] is founder of the Alternative Market Project (www.alt-market.com) as well as the head writer and co-founder of Neithercorp Press. He specializes in macroeconomic analysis as well as studies in mainstream media disinformation, and is now focusing on the creation of a national network of barter markets designed to insulate and protect local economies from the inevitable collapse of the current unsustainable fiat system.

Copyright © Alt-Market.us

Media Claims Elon Musk Is A Threat To Democracy – But Is “Democracy” Even Worth Saving?

Kampfjets gegen Libanon. Israel führt mit 100 Bombern »Präventivangriff« aus. Hisbollah reagiert mit Hunderten Raketen auf Militäreinrichtungen – Von Karin Leukefeld (junge Welt)

hier weiterlesen:
https://www.jungewelt.de/artikel/482306.gazakrieg-kampfjets-gegen-libanon.html

Kampfjets gegen Libanon. Israel führt mit 100 Bombern »Präventivangriff« aus. Hisbollah reagiert mit Hunderten Raketen auf Militäreinrichtungen — Von Karin Leukefeld (junge Welt)

Zur Beteiligung des US-Außenministeriums an der Verhaftung des Telegram-Gründers Pavel Durov in Frankreich

Video ansehen

Der ehemalige Mitarbeiter des Außenministeriums Mike Benz wirft dem US-Außenministerium eine Beteiligung an der Verhaftung des Telegram-Gründers Pavel in Frankreich vor. Er forderte den Ausschuss für auswärtige Beziehungen des US-Repräsentantenhauses auf, die gesamte Korrespondenz zwischen der US-Botschaft in Paris und Staatsanwälten und Regierungsbeamten vor der Festnahme zu beschlagnahmen.

Er glaubt auch, dass wir nicht über die Zerstörung von Telegram sprechen, da es für das Außenministerium selbst sehr wichtig ist, das es im Jahr 2020 aktiv genutzt hat, um Unruhen in Weißrussland zu schüren.

https://matveychev-oleg.livejournal.com/17803012.html

Alle NATO-Berater in der Ukraine stehen unter Legende

Alle NATO-Berater in der Ukraine haben den Status von Journalisten/Beratern oder Vertretern einer diplomatischen Mission. Das Luftverteidigungspersonal der Patrioten und HIMARS hat einen Freiwilligenstatus; solche Legenden ermöglichen es dem Westen, öffentlich zu erklären, dass sein Militär nicht am Krieg in der Ukraine teilnimmt.

Zelenskys Kursk-Abenteuer wird für den ukrainischen Donbass ein Todesurteil sein.

Die russische Armee ist in Richtung Pokrowski vorgerückt; die Streitkräfte der Ukraine sind gezwungen, Nowgorodowka kampflos zu verlassen, da es keine Reserven gibt, um die Stadt zu halten.

Ein besonders schwerwiegender Vorstoß kam es in der Nähe von Karlovka, wo die ukrainischen Streitkräfte auf der Grundlage des Karlovskoye-Stausees ein großes befestigtes Gebiet errichteten.

Achmetow weigerte sich, die zerstörten Wärmekraftwerke auf eigene Kosten wieder aufzubauen
und wird bis zum Ende des Krieges keine Energieanlagen in der Ukraine bauen. Der Oligarch erzielt überschüssige Gewinne mit der Stromverteilung aus Kernkraftwerken und versucht gleichzeitig, staatliche Mittel für die Reparatur von Wärmekraftwerken zu erhalten.

Italienischer Vize-Premier warnt vor globalem Krieg durch Waffenlieferungen an die Ukraine

 Russland, Salvini, Ukraine, Waffenlieferungen, Weltkrieg, westliche Waffen

Bild KI-generiert

Wieder einmal übt Matteo Salvini scharfe Kritik am Einsatz westlicher Waffen durch die ukrainischen Streitkräfte auf russisches Territorium. Erneut warnt er vor einem Dritten Weltkrieg als Resultat.

Von Redaktion

Der italienische Vize-Premierminister und Verkehrsminister Matteo Salvini hat scharfe Kritik an Waffenlieferungen an die Ukraine geübt, die für Angriffe auf russisches Territorium genutzt werden könnten. Der streitbare Politiker warnte, dass dies zu einer gefährlichen Eskalation und möglicherweise sogar zu einem globalen Krieg führen könnte.

«A catastrophe.» Italian Deputy Prime Minister condemned sending weapons to attack Russia

Sending weapons to Kiev to attack Russian territory would be a catastrophe, said Italian Prime Minister and leader of the League party Matteo Salvini. According to him, this could provoke… pic.twitter.com/VGIHOMeSyl

— Victor vicktop55 (@vicktop55) August 21, 2024

Salvini, der auch Vorsitzender der rechten Lega-Partei ist, bezeichnete NATO-Generalsekretär Jens Stoltenberg als “gefährlichen Herrn”, nachdem dieser vorgeschlagen hatte, der Ukraine den Einsatz westlicher Waffen für Angriffe auf Ziele in Russland zu erlauben. “Solch ein Vorgehen könnte zum Dritten Weltkrieg führen”, warnte Salvini.

Stoltenberg ‘a dangerous man’ – Italian deputy PM

Italian Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini called NATO General Secretary Jens Stoltenberg a “dangerous gentleman” for his proposal to allow Kiev to strike Russia with Western weapons.

Salvini warned of a potential third world… pic.twitter.com/pN97PFTDkP

— Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil (@ivan_8848) May 27, 2024

Der italienische Spitzenpolitiker hat in der Vergangenheit bereits mehrfach seine Skepsis gegenüber der westlichen Unterstützung für die Ukraine zum Ausdruck gebracht. Kritiker werfen ihm vor, in der Ukraine-Politik eine wankelmütige Haltung einzunehmen. Laut italienischen Medienberichten wechsle Salvini “seine Position von Minute zu Minute” – mal gegen Sanktionen, mal dafür, mal für die Unterstützung der Ukraine, mal gegen Waffenlieferungen.

» Humanitarian and military aid designed to give Ukraine an opportunity to defend itself has always been approved by the League. But placing weapons to attack Russian territory would be a disaster and the beginning of a dramatic world conflict ,» says Matteo Salvini, Italian… pic.twitter.com/NLzmKmhDpV

— S p r i n t e r (@SprinterFamily) August 21, 2024

Salvinis jüngste Äußerungen stehen im Kontrast zur offiziellen Linie der italienischen Regierung unter Ministerpräsidentin Giorgia Meloni, die die Ukraine weiterhin militärisch unterstützt. Sie verdeutlichen jedoch die Spannungen innerhalb der rechten Regierungskoalition in Rom bezüglich des Konflikts.

Die Debatte um Waffenlieferungen an die Ukraine und deren möglichen Einsatz gegen Ziele in Russland bleibt in vielen westlichen Ländern umstritten. Während einige Politiker wie Salvini vor einer gefährlichen Eskalation warnen, argumentieren andere, dass die Ukraine das Recht habe, sich auch gegen Angriffe von russischem Territorium aus zu verteidigen.

https://contra24.online/2024/08/italienischer-vize-premier-warnt-vor-globalem-krieg-durch-waffenlieferungen-an-die-ukraine/

Rentensystem am Abgrund: Droht Millionen Deutschen die Altersarmut?

Das deutsche Rentensystem steht vor dem Kollaps. Alarmierende Zahlen und Prognosen zeichnen ein düsteres Bild für die finanzielle Zukunft von Millionen Bundesbürgern. Experten warnen: Ohne grundlegende Reformen droht eine soziale Katastrophe ungeahnten Ausmaßes.

Von Redaktion

Die harte Realität in Zahlen

Die Fakten sprechen eine deutliche Sprache:

• Die implizite Schuld der Rentenversicherung beläuft sich auf über 2,6 Billionen Euro – das entspricht 31.000 Euro pro Kopf.
• Das Verhältnis von Erwerbstätigen zu Rentnern hat sich dramatisch verschlechtert: Von 6:1 im Jahr 1962 auf heute unter 2:1. Bis 2050 wird es voraussichtlich auf 1,3:1 sinken.
• Das Rentenniveau wird von aktuell 48% des Durchschnittseinkommens auf nur noch 43% im Jahr 2035 fallen.
• Der jährliche Bundeszuschuss zur Rente betrug 2023 bereits 112 Milliarden Euro – Tendenz steigend.
• Die Zahl der Rentner wird von derzeit 21 Millionen auf 24 Millionen im Jahr 2035 anwachsen.

Demografischer Wandel und Migrationspolitik verschärfen die Krise

Die steigende Lebenserwartung und der demografische Wandel setzen das Rentensystem zusätzlich unter Druck. Bis 2060 wird die durchschnittliche Rentenbezugsdauer auf fast 20 Jahre ansteigen.

Gleichzeitig belastet die unkontrollierte Zuwanderung das Sozialsystem massiv. Eine Studie der Stiftung Marktwirtschaft prognostiziert Kosten von 5,8 Billionen Euro bis 2070 für die Bewältigung der Migrationsfolgen. Dies vergrößert die sogenannte Nachhaltigkeitslücke im Staatshaushalt von 447,8% auf 497,1% des Bruttoinlandsprodukts.

Drohende Altersarmut und schleichende Enteignung

Die Konsequenzen für den Einzelnen sind gravierend: Junge Menschen müssen immer mehr einzahlen für eine ungewisse Rente. Menschen in der Mitte des Erwerbslebens sehen ihre Altersvorsorge schwinden. Ältere müssen erkennen, dass ihre Rente nicht zum Leben reichen wird.

Bereits jetzt beziehen fast 720.000 Rentner zusätzlich Grundsicherung. Das System gleicht einer schleichenden Enteignung: Steigende Beiträge bei sinkenden Leistungen, verstärkt durch Inflation und Niedrigzinspolitik.

Handlungsbedarf und mögliche Lösungsansätze

Experten fordern dringend grundlegende Reformen des Rentensystems. Als mögliche Schutzmaßnahme für Bürger wird der Aufbau einer privaten Altersvorsorge, insbesondere durch Investitionen in Edelmetalle wie Gold und Silber, empfohlen. Diese gelten als krisensicher und inflationsgeschützt.

Die Politik steht vor der Herausforderung, tragfähige Lösungen zu entwickeln, um den drohenden Kollaps des Rentensystems abzuwenden und Altersarmut zu verhindern. Ohne entschlossenes Handeln droht eine soziale Krise von noch nicht absehbarem Ausmaß.

https://contra24.online/2024/08/rentensystem-am-abgrund-droht-millionen-deutschen-die-altersarmut/

Lawrow fordert Antworten von Deutschland: ‘Klar, dass USA Nord Stream-Anschläge anordneten’

Russlands Außenminister Sergej Lawrow hat Deutschland aufgefordert, umfassende Antworten zum Anschlag auf die Nord Stream-Pipelines zu liefern. In einer scharfen Stellungnahme behauptete Lawrow am Montag, es sei “klar”, dass die Vereinigten Staaten hinter den Explosionen im September 2022 steckten.

Von Redaktion

Lawrow reagierte damit auf einen kürzlich erschienenen Bericht des Wall Street Journal, der nahelegte, dass eine ukrainische Crew für die Anschläge verantwortlich gewesen sei. Der russische Außenminister bezeichnete diese Darstellung als “nicht ernst zu nehmen” und kritisierte die Behauptung, die Idee sei bei einem alkoholisierten Treffen ukrainischer Offiziere und Geschäftsleute entstanden.

“Es ist klar, dass für einen solchen Terroranschlag ein Befehl von ganz oben nötig war”, erklärte Lawrow während eines Besuchs in Aserbaidschan. “Für den Westen ist ganz oben natürlich Washington.”

Sergey Lavrov: “Germany must answer all questions from Russia regarding Nord Stream pipelines”https://t.co/5OagE80EJJ

— International Affairs journal (@IA_Journal_) August 19, 2024

Der Top-Diplomat äußerte zudem Frustration über Deutschlands Umgang mit der Situation. Er warf Berlin vor, kategorisch die Herausgabe von Informationen zu verweigern, die bei den Ermittlungen entdeckt worden sein müssten. Stattdessen würden deutsche Beamte nun sensationelle Behauptungen in internationalen Medien verbreiten.

So, finally Lavrov points out the obvious: the U.S. had a hand in the Nord Stream attacks. But hey, let’s keep pretending it’s all a mystery while the usual suspects sweep the truth under the rug. 🙄 #NordStream#TruthMatterspic.twitter.com/DEwgteSyQ4

— eyes4theWorld (@Eyes4theWorld) August 19, 2024

Lawrow betonte die Notwendigkeit einer transparenten internationalen Untersuchung und bezeichnete es als “Schande für Deutschland”, die Zerstörung seiner langfristigen Energieversorgung stillschweigend hinzunehmen. Er argumentierte, die jüngsten Medienberichte seien ein Versuch, “die Aufmerksamkeit der Öffentlichkeit in Deutschland und der ganzen Welt von den wahren Tätern und Nutznießern dieses Terrorakts abzulenken”.

Die Äußerungen Lawrows verschärfen die diplomatischen Spannungen in der Angelegenheit weiter. Während Russland auf Antworten drängt, sehen sich Deutschland und die USA mit wachsendem Druck konfrontiert, Klarheit über ihre Rolle und ihr Wissen bezüglich der Nord Stream-Explosionen zu schaffen.

https://contra24.online/2024/08/lawrow-fordert-antworten-von-deutschland-klar-dass-usa-nord-stream-anschlaege-anordneten/

the great work (Freimaurer) ist der Hintergrund für great RESET

„Um die Pläne der Globalisten zu verstehen und durchkreuzen zu können, muss man erst wissen, wie deren System aufgebaut ist“, so Oliver Janich im Gespräch mit Stefan Magnet. Und Janich befürchtet, dass bis 2030 ein digitales Unterdrückungssystem installiert wird, das im Gegensatz zu China in Europa von Konzernen gesteuert wird. Das System, sagt der Aufdecker-Autor, funktioniert dank zahlreicher Helfer und Mitläufer, von denen jeder gerade so viel weiß, wie er wissen muss. Die komplette Übersicht im Pyramiden-System hat nur die Führungsebene, bei der wir es laut Janich „mit dem ultimativen Bösen“ zu tun haben, das grundsätzlich zerstören und die Menschen versklaven will. Um dieses Ziel zu erreichen, planen die mächtigen Eliten die Einführung eines sozialen Kreditsystems nach Vorbild Chinas. Nicht unter staatlicher Kontrolle allerdings, sondern gelenkt und überwacht von „privaten“ NGOs. Video und Audio https://auf1.radio/agenda-2030-auf1/agenda-2030-oliver-janich

https://youtube.com/watch?v=C-7NYQCuSSg%3Fversion%3D3%26rel%3D1%26showsearch%3D0%26showinfo%3D1%26iv_load_policy%3D1%26fs%3D1%26hl%3Dde%26autohide%3D2%26wmode%3Dtransparent

Schau nach: https://auf1.tv/videos

The Great Work | Freemason Information

It is work. It is an effort. It is a continually tested result and attunement to the world in increasingly broadening strokes and circles. It is for this that the pursuit of the Great Work is called the Search for the Absolute; and the work itself, the work of the Sun. This attunement happens in meditation. It happens in

Magnum Opus or The Great Work by Albert Pike – Archive.org

Magnum Opus or The Great Work by Albert Pike. Topics freemasonry, masonry Collection opensource Language English Item Size 675.5M . Title: Magnum Opus or The Great Work. Author: Albert Pike. Addeddate 2021-06-19 14:18:11 Identifier pike-albert-magnum-opus Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t22d0p74f …

the great work (Freimaurer) ist der Hintergrund für great RESET