INVESTIGATIONS

THE LIES OF THE US EMPIRE WILL BE ITS UNDOING

On Tuesday, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei opened the door to negotiations with the United States, saying there was “no harm” in talking with the “enemy.” The decision opened the way for Iran’s new reformist President Masoud Pezeshkian to fulfill a campaign promise to be more open to the West.

While speaking to his President, Khamenei told him not to trust the United States.

This does not mean that we cannot interact with the same enemy in certain situations. There is no harm in that, but do not place your hopes in them. Do not trust the enemy,” Khamenei told Pezeshkian.

Iran has significant reasons to distrust the United States. In 2015 the United States, Iran and several other countries signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), better known as the Iranian nuclear deal. The deal placed significant restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of Western sanctions on Iran.

In 2018, former US President Donald Trump withdrew from the deal. In 2022, current US President Joe Biden rejected an offer to return to the deal. Since the US withdrawal, Iran is believed to have significantly advanced their nuclear program.

“I think this is just to placate the new president. He’s a reform president. He ran on that ticket to try to open up more avenues to the West,” former senior security policy analyst at the Office of the Secretary of Defense Michael Maloof told Sputnik’s The Final Countdown. “But [JCPOA] is clearly dead, as far as I’m concerned, simply because for three and a half years they tried through the Biden administration and got nowhere. And if Trump comes in, you can almost be guaranteed that he will cancel any agreements.”

For countries around the world, the US reneging on deals is nothing new, it is nearly par for the course. In 1990, as East and West Germany were in the process of unification, then-US Secretary of State James Baker assured Soviet Leader Mikhail Gorbachev that “neither the President nor I intend to extract any unilateral advantages from the processes that are taking place,” and that the US Government understood that “not only for the Soviet Union but for other European countries as well it is important to have guarantees that if the United States keeps its presence in Germany within the framework of NATO, not an inch of NATO’s present military jurisdiction will spread in an eastern direction.”

However, over the next three decades, NATO continued to expand eastward, eventually resulting in the Ukraine conflict.

In 1990, US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie was called into a meeting with then-Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, who had been amassing troops on the border of Kuwait over an oil and border dispute. According to leaked diplomatic cables, Glaspie reportedly told Saddam that “the President had instructed her to broaden and deepen our relations with Iraq,” and that the US “took no position on these Arab affairs.”

Less than three weeks later, Iraq invaded Kuwait, likely interpreting Glaspie’s comments as an assurance the US would remain neutral. Less than a week after that, the US began Operation Desert Shield. Four months later, it started Operation Desert Storm and launched its first airstrikes on Iraqi forces.

“So countries are going to question if they can take the US at its word,” explained Maloof. “And that’s why you’re seeing more than 40 countries, maybe up to 60, wanting to join BRICS and get out from under the dependency of the Western financial system and sanctions altogether.”

The Iran nuclear deal is a moot point at this juncture. “[The International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA)] discovered that the Iranians had actually exceeded 60% and had gone up to 90% enrichment, ‘accidentally.’ So, they have that capability. So, what’s the point of an IAEA inspection any longer?”

But the effects of the United States Empire’s lies will be much more profound than a rapidly advancing Iranian nuclear program, they will destroy its geopolitical influence, decimate its economy and isolate it from much of the rest of the world.

The first to go will be the end of effective unilateral sanctions from the West, a phenomenon that has already begun. “That’s why you see Iran now a prominent member of BRICS, a prominent member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SGO),” Maloof said. “They have learned to get around Western sanctions and it’s going to increase, and that’s why they’re flourishing in many respects.”

It is not only Iran. The West has imposed as many sanctions as it could muster against Russia following the start of its special operation in Ukraine. Despite this, Russia grew its economy to the largest in Europe and the fourth largest in the world in purchase power parity (PPP).

While sanctions were never effective in their stated goal of removing leaders from power, they were able to limit the economic growth of that country at the expense of the population living there. Now, even that tool is leaving the American cupboard. “Over time, they have learned to find ways around [sanctions] and it has actually strengthened them. It’s allowed them to become more self-sufficient to build more indigenous industries, which Iran has done,” explained Maloof.

“We’re sanctioning some of our closest allies for even wanting to trade with Russia. Turkiye, for example, a member of NATO, we’re threatening [them] with sanctions all the time. So that’s why these countries are saying, ‘Look, we’re just going to get off from under this. We can’t fight the US, but we’ll find a way around them. And that’s what’s happened,” Maloof continued.

As BRICS and the SCO grow, so will de-dollarization, which will end the United States’ ability to print money with abandon, avoiding most of the inflation by shipping those dollars overseas where they are typically held by companies and nations for international transactions.

“We have no response to [de-dollarization]. And yet, I’ve seen reports as late as this morning of even West African countries now seriously considering going off of the dollar, or de-dollarization, and switching to tangibles such as gold,” Maloof recounted, pointing specifically to Ghana, which is nominally a Western ally and whose vice president just advocated a switch to gold.

“There’s a gathering storm out there now of some 60 countries that want to join BRICS. And you know, they’re up to 11 right now, but it’s picking up. And they’re going after countries that have natural resources, particularly gold [and] oil, tangibles that can support their currencies and they’re trading more in their currencies, until which time BRICS can come up with its own currency if they decide to go that route.”

Following the adage that if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail, the United States is not equipped to deal with the new reality, only able to look through the prism of force.

“All we can think of is in terms of defensive alliances and people want infrastructure development. Look, we just got kicked out of a bunch of African countries, so did the French, because of our reputation,” said Maloof. “These kinds of things are affecting our ability to come up with an alternative to the route that we’ve been going, which is now, in effect, obsolete.”

Regardless of who wins the US presidency in November, the situation is unlikely to change due to ignorant, arrogant and stubborn US leadership.

“Even if [Former US President Donald] Trump were to win, I doubt that he will be surrounded by advisers that will give him this kind of strategic plan. We need a strategic plan, not a reactionary plan, and nobody has come forward with a strategic plan on how to deal with this, because this element of BRICS and de-dollarization is a long-term process,” Maloof described. “They’re also driven by ideology, and we’ve got to get over that. We’ve got to be looking at the real world in real terms. And this is what has been our downfall in terms of policy formulation.”

This is what has driven us to where we are, to isolation in many respects, long-term isolation, with growing isolation in Latin America and Africa,” Maloof continued. “And the Russians and Chinese are filling that void.”

https://sputnikglobe.com/20240828/the-lies-of-the-us-empire-will-be-its-undoing-1119944710.html

Wo sind all die Nazis, wenn man sie mal braucht?

 teilen tweeten mailen kommentieren pdf download

Ein Meinungsbeitrag von Dirk C. Fleck.

„Wir leben in einer Welt, in der Mediziner die Gesundheit zerstören, Juristen die Gerechtigkeit zerstören, Universitäten das Wissen zerstören, Regierungen die Freiheit zerstören, die Presse die wahren Informationen zerstört, Religionen die Moral zerstören und unsere Banken die Wirtschaft zerstören, welche wiederum die Umwelt zerstört.“

Dieser Satz des US-amerikanischen Journalisten und Pulitzer-Preisträgers Chris Hedges trifft den Nagel auf den Kopf. Allerdings ließe sich da noch eine Menge draufsatteln.

„Ich hasse die aktuelle Ära,“

hat der großartige, gerade verstorbene Alain Delon kurz vor seinem Tod gesagt,

„ich sehe ständig wirklich abscheuliche Kreaturen. Alles ist falsch, alles wird auf den Kopf gestellt. Alle lachen übereinander, ohne sich selbst anzusehen! Es gibt nicht einmal Respekt vor dem gegebenen Wort.“

In den Sozialen Medien wurde der Schauspieler mit dieser Aussage rauf und runter zitiert. Kein Post wurde so oft geteilt und hatte so viele zustimmende Kommentare.

Der Überdruss an diesem entseelten System, in dem die Sprachverwirrung des Guten und Bösen, wie Nietzsche es nennt, unseren Alltag prägt, ist mit Händen zu greifen. Allerdings darf das über die wahren Kräfteverhältnisse in Deutschland nicht hinwegtäuschen. Die breite Mehrheit stellt sich nach wie vor als willfährige Verfügungsmasse dar, die auf „Anraten“ einer an Lächerlichkeit kaum noch zu überbietenden Regierung brav gegen „rechts“ demonstriert, während man sich geistig bereits wieder auf den „kleinen Piks“ gegen Affenpocken vorbereitet, obwohl das milliardenfache Durchimpfen während der angeblichen Corona-Pandemie sich als das größte Verbrechen der gesamten Menschheitsgeschichte zu offenbaren beginnt.

Nun denn. George Orwell, Autor des Dystopie-Klassikers „1984“ hat es kommen sehen. In einem Interview mit der BBC sagte er kurz vor seinem Tod im Jahre 1950 folgendes:

„Mein Buch weist die Richtung, in die wir uns entwickeln. In unserer Welt wird es keine Emotionen geben, außer Angst, Wut, Triumph und Selbsterniedrigung. Aber immer wird es den Rausch der Macht geben. Wenn Sie ein Bild von der Zukunft haben wollen, so stellen Sie sich einen Stiefel vor, der auf einem menschlichen Gesicht herum trampelt. Die Moral, die aus dieser gefährlichen Alptraumsituation hervorgeht, ist einfach: Lasst es nicht geschehen.“

Gut gesagt, aber so einfach ist das nicht, George. Das mit woken Gesetzen bedruckte Seidentuch, das die moralinsauren Propagandisten aus Politik und Medien der Gesellschaft übergeworfen haben, droht die Sinne der Mehrheit derart zu benebeln, dass sie den an den Strippen der wahrhaft Mächtigen zappelnden Politclowns bedingungslos in den Wahnsinn folgt, Atomtod vermutlich inklusive. Die Lügner und Verbrecher an der Spitze des Staates brauchen nur mit den Fingern zu schnippen und schon geht das Volk auf die Straße. Gegen rechts und zur Rettung der Demokratie, die vor ihren Augen gerade von jenen abgebaut wird, deren vergifteten Rufen sie folgen.

Rechts. Was ist das in ihren Augen? Alles, was sich streitbar und kritisch gibt, alles, was die Demokratie lebt und belebt. So fasst man es wohl am besten zusammen. Und was sich in diesem Land heute streitbar und kritisch gibt, wird etikettiert und zensiert. „Verschwörungstheoretiker“, „Schwurbler“, „Querdenker“ (Einsteins Lieblingswort) landen zudem in einen gemeinsamen Topf, wo sie als „Nazis“ im siedenden Wasser der öffentlichen Meinung nach Atem ringen. Damit ist eine Hemmschwelle gefallen, die nie hätte fallen dürfen: die Verharmlosung des Nationalsozialismus und seiner Anhänger.

Und jetzt frage ich: wo sind denn all die neuen Nazis, wenn man sie braucht? Die Rechten (oder sollte ich lieber die Aufrechten sagen?) die Schwurbler, Querdenker, Verschwörungstheoretiker, Coronaleugner und Impfgegner, die Mahner und Warner, die Bekenner zur Heimat, wo sind sie geblieben. Müssen doch Gewicht haben, wenn man große Teile des Volkes gegen sie mobilisiert, um die Demokratie zu retten.

Wo machen sie sich bemerkbar, außer in den Empörungsforen der Alternativen Medien, die inzwischen alle unter strengster Beobachtung stehen. In denen jeder, der sich klar äußert, damit rechnen muss, dass es morgens um 6 bei ihm klingelt? Bleibt uns denn nur noch zu träumen, wie wir den Marsch in die Diktatur der Verblendeten aufhalten können? Ich jedenfalls wurde letzte Nacht mit einem solchen Traum beschenkt. In ihm wurden die Produzenten und Sachverwalter der Dummheit (und nur sie) allesamt von einem tödlichen Virus dahingerafft, weltweit. Es floss wieder wahres Leben in die globale Zivilgesellschaft. Frieden kehrte in die Herzen der Menschen ein, die nichts als wichtiger erachteten, diesen zu pflegen und zu erhalten.

Der Traum wirkte lange nach. Der neue Tag zwinkerte mir morgens zu, als könne ihn kein Wässerchen trüben. In eine Gloriole aus gleißendem Licht gehüllt wirkte er wie ein einziges Versprechen.

+++

Wir danken dem Autor für das Recht zur Veröffentlichung dieses Beitrags.

+++

Bildquelle: TheRightFrameMedia / shutterstock

Kaiserin Baerbock

 teilen tweeten mailen kommentieren pdf download

China: Immer feste druff

Ein Meinungsbeitrag von Uli Gellermann.

Es war der aggressive deutsche Kaiser Wilhelm, der in seiner Hunnenrede bei der Verabschiedung deutscher Soldaten auf dem Weg nach China drohte „dass niemals wieder ein Chinese es wagt, einen Deutschen auch nur scheel anzusehen.” Frau Baerbock steht in dieser Tradition, wenn sie die sogenannte Übungsmission der Fregatte “Baden-Württemberg” im Südchinesischen Meer ankündigt und der VR China gleich mal droht, dass die Fregatte auch die Straße von Taiwan nutzen könne: Die aggressive Außenministerin will die Bundesmarine so nah als möglich an die Küste der Volksrepublik bringen.

Zwerg droht dem chinesischen Riesen

Möchte der deutsche Zwerg dem chinesischen Riesen drohen? Will die NATO-Baerbock im Schlepptau der USA die Kräfteverhältnisse im Südchinesischen Meer ändern? Die 7. US-Flotte patrouilliert bereits im in diesem strategischem Raum. Mit ihren mindestens 30 Kriegsschiffen und Unterseebooten, bis zu 50 Logistik- und Versorgungsschiffen, mit bis zu 300 Flugzeugen sowie rund 40.000 Matrosen und Marineinfanteristen wollen die USA ihre Macht demonstrieren und die Anrainer des Südchinesischen Meeres bedrohen.

Dicke Lippe Baerbock

Aus dem Mund der Baerbock – die einen Flugzeugträger nicht von ihrem eigenen Achtersteven unterscheiden kann – quäken natürlich die Interessen der USA. Die wollen sich mit der VR China anlegen. Die machtbesessenen USA würden zu gern den russischen Partner im Ringen um die Souveränität der Völker einschüchtern. Da käme es ihnen auf ein paar deutsche tote Soldaten mehr oder weniger nicht an. Deshalb fordert die Baerbock, dass das „Recht der friedlichen Durchfahrt“ auch für die Straße von Taiwan gelten solle. Statt diese Provokation als staatsgefährdend zu charakterisieren, klatschen die deutschen Medien Beifall.

Baerbock rechtsextrem

Die chinesischen Tageszeitung “Gobal Times” hat die Baerbock und ihre GRÜNEN als „rechtsextrem“ bezeichnet. Da sind die Kollegen der “Gobal Times” weiter als die innerdeutsche Debatte; in der werden die GRÜNEN immer noch als links behauptet. Auch der hilflose Versuch alternativer Politgrößen, die Begriffe „links oder rechts“ als überflüssig einzuordnen, wird angesichts der Kaiser-Wilhelm-Nachfolge der Baerbock lächerlich. Es war bei Wilhelm Zwo der nackte Imperialismus, der sich in seiner antichinesischen Aggressivität ausdrückte und bei der Baerbock ist die Provokation der deutschen Außenministerin nichts anderes: Eine dummfreche Haltung, die lieber einen Krieg riskiert, als einfach mal den Mund zu halten.

Das Blöken der Schlachtlämmer

„Pardon wird nicht gegeben, Gefangene werden nicht gemacht!“, blökte der deutsche Kaiser damals gen China. Das Blöken sollte den Deutschen nach zwei verlorenen Weltkriegen eigentlich vergangen sein. Doch spätestens seit Habecks Äußerungen, der „mit Deutschland noch nie etwas anzufangen“ wusste, weiß man, was die GRÜNEN von unserem Land halten. Sie halten es bestenfalls für ein Beuteobjekt, das ihnen einträgliche Pfründe liefert und auf dessen Fundamenten sie sich bis zu Kriegsfurien aufplustern können. Und die Deutschen? Die gelten ihnen nur als Blöd-Lämmer, reif für Schlachten.

+++

Dieser Beitrag wurde zuerst am 27. August 2024 auf dem Portal Rationalgalerie veröffentlicht.

+++

Wir danken dem Autor für das Recht zur Veröffentlichung dieses Beitrags.

+++

Bildquelle: Alexandros Michailidis / shutterstock

HONOR LOST FOREVER: GRUESOME PHOTOS OF US MARINES MASSACRE OF IRAQI CIVILIANS IN HADITHA SPARK GLOBAL OUTRAGE

Thursday, 29 August 2024 10:24 AM  [ Last Update: Thursday, 29 August 2024 11:16 AM ]

A five-year-old girl, Zainab Younis Salim, was killed by US Marines during the Haditha massacre on November 19, 2005, in Haditha, Iraq. (Photo by the US military/ The New Yorker)

The recently disclosed images from the 2005 massacre by US Marines in the Iraqi town of Haditha have shocked the world, igniting a wave of outrage and condemnation on social media.

Under the Freedom of Information Act and after years of legal battles, The New Yorker magazine obtained and released the images of the carnage that killed 24 civilians, including a three-year-old girl. 

The graphic photos, which have been kept hidden for nearly two decades, show the victims, many of them shot in the head at close range.

The carnage, whose perpetrators never spent a day behind bars, adds to the long list of atrocities committed by the US occupation forces in Iraq, including those at the notorious Abu Ghraib prison.

Social media users are denouncing the bloodshed as a stark reminder of the numerous war crimes committed by the US forces in Iraq and across the region, as well as the lack of accountabilty for those involved. 

The Haditha Massacre is a stain on the honor of the US Marine Corps that can never be removed. You can’t stop massacres like this from an institutional point, but the Marine Corps tried to cover up this crime at every level. https://t.co/BjLkQ1pjyo— Naht Rahbitullah Bahbizai (@NahtBahbizai) August 27, 2024

“This,” journalist Murtaza Hussain reminded the world, “is what the US military was doing in Iraq.”

Activist Greg J Stoker said in an X post, “This is big. US interventionism must end now.”

Photos from the Marine Corp’s 2005 Haditha Massacre in Iraq were just acquired under the Freedom of Information Act.

This is big. US interventionism must end now. pic.twitter.com/ES1bPCf3cg— Greg J Stoker (@gregjstoker) August 28, 2024

American journalist Max Blumenthal said the photos of the US massacre “are indictments of the contemporary US political establishment, including the current president who whipped the vote in support of invading Iraq.”

New horrific photos of the Haditha Massacre in Iraq have finally been released after almost 20 years.

The Marines responsible for massacring 27 Iraqis including a 3 year old, have yet to see a minute of jail time.

The US doesn’t fight terrorism. It propagates & protects it. pic.twitter.com/pAFKKApwX8— Duopoly Destroyer (@realnikohouse) August 28, 2024

Another user highlighted Washington’s efforts to conceal the truth, while others drew a parallel between the Haditha massacre and the Israeli genocide in Gaza. 

✨
🍉

The United States invaded Iraq in 2003 based on false claims about Baghdad possessing weapons of mass destruction, leaving a trail of destruction, death, and chaos in the Arab country.

The US and its allies re-launched a military campaign in 2014 to supposedly fight off the Daesh terrorist group.

19 years on, Haditha massacre photos testament to US war crimes in Iraq

In an investigative report published on Tuesday, the New Yorker laid bare what people in Iraq already knew but the US military-industrial complex desperately tried to cover up for 19 years.

The US military claimed to be ending its combat mission in Iraq in 2021, but said it would retain some 2,500 troops in the country as alleged advisors, although Baghdad and its allies had decisively defeated terrorists in late 2017.

In 2020, the Iraqi parliament voted in favor of the expulsion of the foreign forces after a US drone strike assassinated Iran’s top anti-terror commander, General Qassem Soleimani, and deputy commander of Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Units (PMU) counter-terrorism force, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, outside Baghdad International Airport.


Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:

www.presstv.co.uk

NOTHING BUT LOSSES FOR KIEV FORCES IN KURSK (VIDEOS)

The Russian military’s Sever Group of Forces repelled four Ukrainian attacks that targeted the settlements of Korenevo and Cherkasskoye Porechnoye in the direction of Kursk, the Russian Ministry of Defense announced on August 29.

In a briefing, the ministry also said that the group prevented Kiev forces towards the settlements of Borki, Kremyanoye, Spalnoye, Martynovka and Cherkasskaya Konopelka.

Some 70 Ukrainian troops were killed or wounded and five others surrounded during these failed attacks. In addition, four armored fighting vehicles were destroyed.

Separately, a series of Russian air and artillery strikes hit Ukraine’s 22nd, 61st, and 115th mechanized, 17th tank, 80th, and 82nd air assault brigades as well as the 1st National Guard Brigade and the 1004th Security and Service Brigade close to the settlements of Apanasovka, Borki, Byakhovo, Vishnyovka, Zaoleshinka, Kubatkin, Kolmakov, Krasnooktyabrsky, Lyubimovka, Mikhailovka, Novaya Sorochina, Obukhovka, Plekhovo, Rubanshchina, Russkoye Porechnoye, Snagost and Cherkasskaya Konopelka, according to the ministry.

Other strikes targeted reserves of 22nd, 61st, 41st mechanized, and 82nd air assault brigades, the 1st Brigade of National Guard as well as the 101st, 103rd, and 129th territorial defense brigades near the settlements of Belopolye, Basovka, Vodolagi, Glukhov, Iskriskovshchina, Mikhailovskoye, Pervomayskoye, Pustogorod, Sumy, Shalygino and Esman in the Ukrainian region of Sumy, which borders Kursk.

“The AFU [Armed Forces of Ukraine] losses were more than 400 Ukrainian troops and 29 armored vehicles, including one infantry fighting vehicle, one armored personnel carrier, 27 armored fighting vehicles as well as one artillery gun, one MLRS [multiple launch rocket system], one mortar and 17 motor vehicles,” the ministry said.

“Since the beginning of hostilities in Kursk region, the AFU have lost up to 7,450 troops, 74 tanks, 36 infantry fighting vehicles, 64 armored personnel carriers, 486 armored fighting vehicles, 227 motor vehicles, 52 artillery guns, 15 multiple-launch rocket system launchers, including four of HIMARS MLRS and one of MLRS, five SAM [surface-to-air missile] launchers, 10 electronic warfare stations, two counter-battery radars, one air defense radar, five engineering vehicles as well as two counter obstacle vehicles and one UR-77 mine clearing vehicle,” it added.

Russian media also shared several videos showing Russian strikes and some of Ukraine’s recent losses in both Kursk and Sumy.

Kiev forces backed by foreign mercenaries infiltrated Kursk on August 6, in a surprise attack that was apparently orchestrated with help from NATO. The attack has so far claimed the lives of more than 30 Russian civilians and displaced over 140,000 others.

The Russian military has already halted the advance of Kiev forces in Kursk. Currently, work is underway to liberate the region.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence

NOW hosted at southfront.press

Previously, SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence was at southfront.org.

The .org domain name had been blocked by the US (NATO) (https://southfront.press/southfront-org-blocked-by-u-s-controlled-global-internet-supervisor/) globally, outlawed and without any explanation

Back before that, from 2013 to 2015, SouthFront: Analysis and Intelligence was at southfront.com

SOUTHFRONT.PRESS

MORE ON THIS TOPIC:



https://t.me/share/embed?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theinteldrop.org&telegram-share-url=https%3A%2F%2Fsouthfront.press%2Fnothing-but-losses-for-kiev-forces-in-kursk-videos%2F&comment=Nothing%20But%20Losses%20For%20Kiev%20Forces%20In%20Kursk%20(Videos)

Support SouthFront

THE US ELITES JUST CANNOT ACCEPT THE CHANGES IN THE WORLD

In the US media and in the writings of a number of political scientists, the decline of the role and influence of the United States in the world is increasingly recognised. However, Washington is still thinking in terms of the last century, believing that the whole world revolves only around itself, and that the ‘poor’ United States are being opposed by revisionist (i.e. refusing to live according to US ways) powers, such as China and Russia, and such ‘villains’ as Iran and DPRK even openly sabotage US policy.

It would seem that the incredible growth of the Chinese economy, which has overtaken the US one and confidently and rapidly continues to develop, the strengthening of other states – primarily the Russian Federation – as well as the more energetic activities of the states of the Global South to protect their own interests should have sobered US officials. The unipolar period of the world ended long ago, and now even the leaders of Western European states recognise that we live in a system of international relations that is characterised by multipolarity.

Sometimes one has to wonder with what arrogance US statesmen and public figures look at the world, tending to interpret the numerous miscalculations and failures of US foreign policy as malicious machinations of hostile states.

For example, according to the director of the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, Condoleezza Rice, who at the beginning of the 21st century was both assistant to the President for National Security and Secretary of State of the United States (and during this period of the image of a pragmatic politician was being created for her), in an article published recently by the Foreign Affairs magazine, she concludes that existing problems “are complicated by Russia’s growing cooperation with China, Iran and North Korea. The four countries have a common goal: to undermine and replace the US-led international system that they hate”.

The article admits that “the United States is tempted to turn inward”, so it is titled «The Perils of Isolationism». The main idea is that the US should continue its interventionist course with only minor adjustments. Rice writes that “the United States is a different country now – exhausted by eight decades of international leadership, some of it successful and appreciated, and some of it dismissed as a failure. The American people are different, too – less confident in their institutions and in the viability of the American dream. Years of divisive rhetoric…have left Americans with a tattered sense of shared values”.

The US does not want to remove the uniform of the ‘global gendarme’

However, no matter what, Washington must continue its vector of pressure in international affairs, strive (as before) to isolate Russia and maintain that “China’s behaviour is unacceptable”. “Never again should Washington unfreeze Iranian assets as the Biden administration did”.

According to Rice, in order to ensure an internationalist foreign policy, in other words ensuring Washington’s dictate and interference, the president must paint a vivid picture of what this world would be like without an active United States, i.e. without US leadership. In this case, we all face chaos and disorder. Only the United States is capable of ensuring the future development of mankind, since “great-power DNA is still very much in the American genome”. Recognising that Americans have seriously exhausted their capabilities in the outside world, Rice ignores and does not mention the possibility of reaching compromise and solutions based on taking into account the interests of other parties; it is only about the US imposing its views and its decisions, it simply cannot suggest other options.

Unfortunately, such a black-and-white vision of the world is still very typical for most US political scientists. They cannot break free from the uniform of the world gendarme in any way. Even the biggest failures in foreign policy in recent years have not taught them anything.

Veniamin Popov, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Candidate of Historical Sciences, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook

Tags: GeopoliticsInternational politicsMultipolar worldPolitical ignorancePoliticsUS HypocrisyUSA

Related articles:

Update Nordstream: Im Auto unbehelligt durch Deutschland

29. August 2024

Den Nordstream-Anschlag soll ein ukrainisches Kommando verübt haben. Nun kommen neue pikante Details ans Tageslicht.

Laut Sicherheitskreisen, auf die sich der “Spiegel” beruft, entkam der Tatverdächtige – ein Ukrainer – mit einem Auto der ukrainischen Botschaft aus Polen in die Ukraine.

Zuvor soll er ganz entspannt Urlaub in Deutschland gemacht haben – natürlich unbehelligt von Polizei und Sicherheitsdiensten.

Das kann doch nicht wahr sein, oder?

Wenn doch, dann muß die Bundesregierung Konsequenzen ziehen – gegenüber Polen, vor allem aber gegenüber der Ukraine.

Wenn nichts geschieht, ist entweder die Story falsch – oder wir haben die falsche Regierung!?

Denkbar wäre natürlich auch beides: Die Story gibt nur einen Teil der Wahrheit wieder – und die Regierung… (diesen Gedanken bitte selbst weiterführen)

Mehr zu Nordstream hier

Tarik Cyril Amar: Democracy kaput: Germans want peace with Russia, but their rulers only answer to Washington and Kiev

By Tarik Cyril Amar*

The ruling elites’ dismal unpopularity is a deserved result of ignoring the real concerns of their own citizens

Since the beginning of the Ukraine Crisis in 2013/14, German governments, first under former chancellor Angela Merkel, then under her pathetic successor Olaf Scholz, have totally failed to help find a solution through compromise. This is no minor matter, and history won’t look kindly on Germany. Representing a traditionally significant if declining and now self-diminishing power in Europe, Berlin could have made a difference – quite conceivably one that would have saved hundreds of thousands of lives.

Yet things are what they are. Initially, under the thoroughly opportunistic yet usually intelligent Merkel, this German failure was mostly due to subservience to the US but practiced in Berlin’s then signature style of evasive shiftiness. Yes, Merkel helped Kiev sabotage the 2015 Minsk II agreement, which could have avoided large-scale war between Russia and Ukraine. But she did that on the sly and only admitted it retrospectively, when criticized for having been “soft” on Russia. “No, I wasn’t!” she, in essence retorted“I did my part and lied like a street grifter!” What can one say? Ideas of personal dignity differ across cultures.

Under her successor, the merely opportunistic Scholz, Berlin’s approaches have reverted to a certain elementary simplicity. The so-called Zeitenwende (epochal turn) he announced two years ago with traditional German modesty means that his coalition government has obeyed Washington in an unprecedentedly self-harming manner. Accepting sabotage of vital infrastructure – Nord Stream – and the systematic demolishing of the German economy by America’s beggar-thy-vassal policy, Scholz has grinned submissively, while not just sacrificing national interests but taking a flamethrower to them.

Read more  Germany is all too happy to paint a target on its back

At the same time – and with a certain consistency one may also observe in committed masochists – this government of death wish loyalty has also ruined Germany’s relationship with Russia with Teutonic furor and thoroughness. All to pander to a Ukrainian regime that now stands accused of blowing up Nord Stream. That accusation makes no sense. Kiev loves to do its worst, true. But it could not have done it without the US. And yet the accusation is the new party line handed down via the Wall Street Journal. It serves as yet another test of how much public humiliation Berlin will take. Answer: there’s no limit.

But Berlin is not Germany. A government so bizarrely out of touch with its own country and its interests is unlikely to represent its citizens well. For some of its members that is even a point of pride. Foreign minister and geometry expert Annalena “360 degrees” Baerbock has long declared that she doesn’t care what her voters want but only about what the Zelensky regime demands. Baerbock, then, must have been positively delighted by the results of a recent and solid opinion poll. 

Conducted by the topnotch INSA pollster, the new poll proves that many Germans do not see foreign policy – especially with respect to Russia and Ukraine – the way their current, immensely unpopular and massively failing (as even the Economist admits) rulers do. Consider some highlights: Asked if they are in favor or against peace negotiations between Ukraine and Russia, 68% of respondents were in favor.

And 65% consider it a “good” or “very good” idea to offer Moscow a quid pro quo, in which Russia would agree to a ceasefire and negotiations, while the West would stop supplying Ukraine with weapons. It’s another matter that Moscow would be unlikely to accept such a deal; those times are over. But Germans outside the Berlin elite clearly prefer winding down the war in lieu of the forever-war scenario that NATO and EU officially promote.

Read more  Will Ukraine cause a new nuclear disaster?

A clear plurality of respondents, 46%, believe that their government has failed to engage in enough diplomacy to protect Germany from the risk of war. Only 26% feel that Berlin has done enough. Yet there is no duty more elementary for rulers than doing everything possible to protect citizens from the threat of war. They cannot always succeed. But those widely seen as not having tried hard enough lose their legitimacy. That much we have known, at the latest since English political philosopher and arch-realist Thomas Hobbes published his “Leviathan” in the seventeenth century.

Legitimacy may sound abstract. Let’s talk about elections then, especially as three important regional elections are coming up. In the länder (states) of Saxony, Thuringia, and Brandenburg, all in Germany’s East, the Berlin coalition parties are staring at serious, even devastating losses to be inflicted by two surging newcomers, the very rightwing AfD and the leftwing yet culturally conservative BSW, named after its leader Sarah Wagenknecht.

Could the decline of the coalition parties have something to do with their resolute detachment from many voters’ wishes and fears over foreign policy? Absolutely. Asked in the INSA poll if a party’s demanding or failing to demand peace negotiations for the Russia-Ukraine War is a decisive factor in casting their vote, 43% of respondents answered in the affirmative. The same share said “no.” But leaving almost half the electorate with a strong sense that you don’t care about what they care about – especially in matters of life and death, i.e. war and peace – is never a winning strategy.

It is true that the question focused specifically on an election at the federal level; that is, for Germany as a whole. Regional politics, you might be tempted to think, has different priorities. You’d be so wrong, though. For one thing, Germans love to use their many regional elections as a way to punish the federal government. Voters do not make a neat separation between voting locally and dishing out the pain centrally. On the contrary.

Read more  Russia has never tried to dictate any narrative to me, unlike the West – Scott Ritter

Second, the results of regional elections, therefore, constantly affect Berlin politics, at this point right into the sick heart of a coalition that is terminal already. Third, regional elections in what used to be East Germany before the West German takeover in 1990 are even more neuralgic, because as a rule, voters there tend to be especially skeptical about Berlin’s by now abject subservience to the US and self-defeating if neo-traditional Russophobia.

Germany’s current mainstream media, think tanks, and academic cadres – such as conformist historians Jan Behrends and Ilko-Sascha Kowalczuk – love to caricature, belittle, and patronize those Germans in the East of the country as in essence backward and brainwashed by Russians. (By the way, if you think that sounds weirdly familiar, that’s how Ukraine got its local civil war going in 2014.) Yet the Soviets/Russians haven’t had a say in eastern Germany for over a third of a century now. While Washington, of course, has maintained its propaganda grip. Maybe the proud domestic kulturträger (culture bearers) of NATO “value” Germany, and who love to look down on their eastern compatriots, should face their own lack of intellectual, political, and ethical independence instead. Where the fear of freedom cripples thought (while boosting careers), a little Kantian reliance on one’s own judgment might help.

In any case, belittling Germans in the East will make them only more determined, and rightly so, to vote their probably freer minds. And what freer minds in Germany see is a government that serves not their country but the US and Ukraine. That is a recipe for richly deserved defeat.

*Tarik Cyril Amar, a historian from Germany working at Koç University, Istanbul, on Russia, Ukraine, and Eastern Europe, the history of World War II, the cultural Cold War, and the politics of memory

Source: https://www.rt.com/news/603143-germans-want-peace-ukraine-russia/

Durov : petite arrestation entre amis du pouvoir, une manie macroniste…

L’arrestation de Pavel Durov par la police française fait grand bruit. On est encore très loin de tout savoir sur les pressions exercées par le pouvoir français sur cet homme qui a fondé l’un des plus puissants réseaux numériques du monde… sans collaborer avec les services occidentaux. Mais ce qu’on sait déjà mérite d’être signalé : l’opération est menée par le coeur du réacteur macroniste et par ses excroissances dans nos services de police.

Rappelons d’abord que, après avoir été menacé par le pouvoir russe, Durov a choisi l’exil. La France lui a attribué, à cette occasion, la nationalité française.

Il semblerait qu’il fasse l’objet d’une procédure d’enquête de la part de plusieurs services, coordonnée par l’Office des Mineurs, une entitée créée en 2023 par la jeune commissaire Gabrielle Hazan, pour lutter contre la pédophilie et la pédocriminalité, tout particulièrement sur Internet.

Si vous cherchez à comprendre comment fonctionne cet office, vous en saurez plus ici. Le ministère de l’Intérieur a aussi produit les éléments de langage officiels à retenir sur cette institution née il y a moins d’un an…

Comme nous l’avons dit plus haut, l’OFMIN est dirigé par une jeune commissaire.

Celle-ci a expliqué dans la presse féminine son étonnante ascension :

Mon premier poste était à la sûreté régionale des transports à Paris, c’est un service d’investigation spécialisé dans la délinquance commise dans les transports en commun avec une compétence dans toute l’Ile-de-France (…)

Deux années plus tard, j’ai été nommée chef du service d’investigation du commissariat de Versailles. (…)

Ensuite, j’ai eu le souhait d’accéder à la direction centrale. Le travail de lien entre l’action politique et les directions opérationnelles m’intéressait.

L’expérience de terrain permet de poser un constat, de comprendre les enjeux pour ensuite mieux exprimer et défendre les besoins opérationnels de la police. C’est comme ça que je suis arrivée à Beauvau, au cabinet du directeur général de la police nationale en tant qu’adjointe au conseiller judiciaire.

On appréciera le récit quasi-magique donné par l’intéressée sur sa réussite personnelle. La réalité est probablement un peu plus complexe.

Le directeur général de la police nationale n’est autre qu’un certain Frédéric Veaux, dont la carrière a connu un tournant important en 2009 lorsqu’il est devenu l’adjoint du chef des services de renseignement intérieur Bernard Squarcini. Ce rôle éminent lui permettra de devenir Préfet, puis, en 2020, directeur général de la police nationale. Il devient alors, en quelque sorte, l’une des figures tutélaires du gouvernement profond en France.

Dans cette fonction, il s’illustrera par la société constant apporté aux policiers auteurs de violences contre des manifestants.

C’est donc cet homme qui “lance” la carrière de Gabrielle Hazan.

En outre, Frédéric Veaux est, à la ville, le compagnon d’une membre du Conseil Constitutionnel, ancienne directrice de cabinet d’Eruc Dupond-Moretti.

Nous sommes là au coeur de ce qui compte dans la police macroniste. Au coeur du pouvoir.

La guerre à l’occidentale – L’appropriation du récit l’emporte sur la réalité

https://reseauinternational.net/la-guerre-a-loccidentale-lappropriation-du-recit-lemporte-sur-la-realite/

L’équipement allemand visible à Koursk a fait ressurgir de vieux fantômes et a renforcé la prise de conscience des intentions hostiles de l’Occident à l’égard de la Russie. La réplique tacite est «plus jamais ça».

La propagande de guerre et les feintes sont vieilles comme le monde. Il n’y a rien de nouveau. Mais ce qui est nouveau, c’est que l’infoguerre n’est plus le complément d’objectifs de guerre plus vastes, mais qu’elle est devenue une fin en soi.

L’Occident en est venu à considérer que «posséder» le récit gagnant – et présenter l’autre comme maladroit, dissonant et extrémiste – était plus important que d’affronter les faits sur le terrain. Selon ce point de vue, posséder le récit gagnant, c’est gagner. La «victoire» virtuelle l’emporte donc sur la «vraie» réalité.

Ainsi, la guerre devient plutôt le cadre permettant d’imposer un alignement idéologique au sein d’une vaste alliance mondiale et de le faire respecter par des médias complaisants.

Cet objectif est plus prioritaire que, par exemple, la garantie d’une capacité de production suffisante pour soutenir les objectifs militaires. L’élaboration d’une «réalité» imaginaire a pris le pas sur le façonnement de la réalité sur le terrain.

Le fait est que cette approche – qui est fonction de l’alignement de l’ensemble de la société (tant à l’intérieur qu’à l’extérieur) – crée des pièges dans de fausses réalités, de fausses attentes, dont il est pratiquement impossible de sortir (lorsque cela devient nécessaire), précisément parce que l’alignement imposé a ossifié le sentiment public. La possibilité pour un État de changer de cap au fur et à mesure que les événements se déroulent est réduite ou perdue, et la lecture précise des faits sur le terrain s’oriente vers le politiquement correct et s’éloigne de la réalité.

L’effet cumulatif d’un «récit virtuel gagnant » comporte néanmoins le risque de glisser progressivement vers une «guerre réelle» involontaire.

Prenons, par exemple, l’incursion orchestrée et équipée par l’OTAN dans l’oblast de Koursk, qui revêt une importance symbolique. En termes de «récit gagnant», l’attrait pour l’Occident est évident : l’Ukraine «apporte la guerre en Russie».

Si les forces ukrainiennes avaient réussi à s’emparer de la centrale nucléaire de Koursk, elles auraient alors disposé d’une importante monnaie d’échange et auraient sans doute détourné les forces russes de la «ligne» ukrainienne qui ne cesse de s’effondrer dans le Donbass.

Et pour couronner le tout (en termes d’infoguerre), les médias occidentaux étaient préparés et alignés pour montrer le président Poutine comme «gelé» par l’incursion surprise, et «vacillant» d’anxiété à l’idée que le public russe se retourne contre lui dans sa colère face à l’humiliation.

Bill Burns, directeur de la CIA, a estimé que «la Russie n’offrirait aucune concession sur l’Ukraine, jusqu’à ce que l’excès de confiance de Poutine soit remis en question et que l’Ukraine puisse montrer sa force». D’autres responsables américains ont ajouté que l’incursion de Koursk ne suffirait pas à amener la Russie à la table des négociations ; il serait nécessaire de poursuivre l’opération de Koursk par d’autres opérations audacieuses (pour ébranler le sang froid de Moscou).

Bien entendu, l’objectif global était de montrer la Russie comme fragile et vulnérable, conformément à l’idée selon laquelle, à tout moment, la Russie pourrait se fissurer et s’éparpiller au gré du vent, en fragments. L’Occident en sortirait vainqueur, bien entendu.

En fait, l’incursion à Koursk était un énorme pari de l’OTAN : Il s’agissait d’hypothéquer les réserves militaires et les blindés de l’Ukraine, comme des jetons sur la table de roulette, en pariant qu’un succès éphémère à Koursk bouleverserait l’équilibre stratégique. Le pari a été perdu et les jetons confisqués.

En clair, l’affaire de Koursk illustre le problème que posent à l’Occident les «récits gagnants» : Leur défaut inhérent est qu’ils sont fondés sur l’émotivité et qu’ils évitent l’argumentation. Inévitablement, ils sont simplistes. Ils sont simplement destinés à alimenter un alignement commun de «l’ensemble de la société». En d’autres termes, les médias, les entreprises, les agences fédérales, les ONG et le secteur de la sécurité devraient tous s’opposer à tous les «extrémismes» qui menacent «notre démocratie».

Cet objectif, en soi, exige que le discours soit peu exigeant et relativement peu controversé : «Notre démocratie, nos valeurs et notre consensus». La convention nationale du parti démocrate, par exemple, fait de la «joie» (répétée à l’infini), du «mouvement vers l’avant» et de l’«opposition à la bizarrerie» ses principales déclarations. Ils sont banals, mais l’énergie et l’élan de ces mèmes ne viennent pas tant de leur contenu que du cadre hollywoodien délibéré qui leur confère un caractère éblouissant et glamour.

Il n’est pas difficile de comprendre comment ce zeitgeist unidimensionnel a pu contribuer à ce que les États-Unis et leurs alliés se trompent sur l’impact de l’«aventure audacieuse» de Koursk d’aujourd’hui sur les Russes ordinaires.

«Koursk» a une histoire. En 1943, l’Allemagne a envahi la Russie à Koursk pour détourner l’attention de ses propres pertes, l’Allemagne ayant finalement été vaincue lors de la bataille de Koursk. Le retour du matériel militaire allemand dans les environs de Koursk a dû en laisser plus d’un bouche bée ; le champ de bataille actuel autour de la ville de Soudja est précisément l’endroit où, en 1943, les 38e et 40e armées soviétiques se sont lovées pour une contre-offensive contre la 4e armée allemande.

Au cours des siècles, la Russie a été diversement attaquée sur son flanc vulnérable depuis l’ouest. Et plus récemment par Napoléon et Hitler. Il n’est donc pas surprenant que les Russes soient très sensibles à cette histoire sanglante. Bill Burns et consorts ont-ils bien réfléchi à la question ? Ont-ils imaginé que l’invasion de la Russie par l’OTAN donnerait à Poutine l’impression d’être «défié» et qu’avec une nouvelle poussée, il plierait et accepterait une issue «gelée» en Ukraine – avec l’entrée de cette dernière dans l’OTAN ? Peut-être.

En fin de compte, le message envoyé par les services occidentaux est que l’Occident (l’OTAN) vient pour la Russie. C’est le sens du choix délibéré de Koursk. En lisant les runes du message de Bill Burns, on comprend qu’il faut se préparer à la guerre avec l’OTAN.

Pour être clair, ce genre de «récit gagnant» autour de Koursk n’est ni une tromperie ni une feinte. Les accords de Minsk étaient des exemples de tromperie, mais il s’agissait de tromperies fondées sur une stratégie rationnelle (c’est-à-dire qu’elles étaient historiquement normales). Les tromperies de Minsk visaient à faire gagner du temps à l’Occident pour poursuivre la militarisation de l’Ukraine – avant d’attaquer le Donbass. La tromperie a fonctionné, mais seulement au prix d’une rupture de confiance entre la Russie et l’Occident. Cependant, les tromperies de Minsk ont également accéléré la fin d’une ère de 200 ans d’occidentalisation de la Russie.

L’affaire Koursk, quant à elle, est d’une autre nature. Elle repose sur les notions d’exceptionnalisme occidental. L’Occident se perçoit comme se plaçant du «bon côté de l’Histoire». Les «récits gagnants» affirment essentiellement – sous une forme séculaire – le caractère inévitable de la mission eschatologique occidentale de rédemption et de convergence mondiales. Dans ce nouveau contexte narratif, les faits sur le terrain deviennent de simples irritants et non des réalités dont il faut tenir compte.

C’est leur talon d’Achille.

La convention du DNC à Chicago a toutefois mis en évidence une autre préoccupation :

Tout comme l’Occident hégémonique est né de l’ère de la guerre froide, façonné et revigoré par l’opposition dialectique au communisme (dans la mythologie occidentale), nous voyons aujourd’hui un «extrémisme» totalisant (prétendu) (qu’il soit du type MAGA ou de la variété externe : Iran, Russie, etc.) – posé à Chicago dans une opposition dialectique hégélienne similaire à l’ancien capitalisme contre le communisme ; mais dans le cas d’aujourd’hui, il s’agit de l’«extrémisme» en conflit avec «Notre Démocratie».

La thèse narrative du DNC de Chicago est elle-même une tautologie de différenciation identitaire se présentant comme un «ensemble» sous la bannière de la diversité et en conflit avec la «blancheur» et l’«extrémisme». L’«extrémisme» est effectivement présenté comme le successeur de l’ancienne antithèse de la guerre froide,lecommunisme.

L’arrière-boutique de Chicago s’imagine peut-être qu’une confrontation avec l’extrémisme – au sens large – entraînera à nouveau un rajeunissement de l’Amérique, comme ce fut le cas dans l’après-guerre froide. Ce qui signifie qu’un conflit avec l’Iran, la Russie et la Chine (d’une manière différente) pourrait être mis à l’ordre du jour. Les signes avant-coureurs sont là (en plus du besoin de l’Occident de remettre à plat son économie, ce que la guerre permet régulièrement).

Le stratagème de Koursk a sans doute semblé intelligent et audacieux à Londres et à Washington. Mais pour quel résultat ? Il n’a atteint ni l’objectif de prendre la centrale nucléaire de Koursk, ni celui d’éloigner les troupes russes de la ligne de contact. La présence ukrainienne dans l’oblast de Koursk sera éliminée.

En revanche, elle a mis fin à toute perspective de règlement négocié en Ukraine. La méfiance de la Russie à l’égard des États-Unis est désormais absolue. Cela a renforcé la détermination de Moscou à poursuivre l’opération spéciale jusqu’à son terme. Les équipements allemands visibles à Koursk ont réveillé de vieux fantômes et renforcé la conscience des intentions hostiles de l’Occident à l’égard de la Russie. La riposte tacite est : «Plus jamais ça».

Alastair Crooke

Создайте подобный сайт на WordPress.com
Начало работы