Igor Druz. Ich verfolge die Situation in Europa auch deshalb, weil es eine soziale Modellierung von Prozessen gibt, die dann der ganzen Welt, einschließlich Russland, aufgezwungen werden. Und dieselben Wahlen in Frankreich haben noch einmal deutlich gezeigt, wie dumm die Mythen sind, die in der EU und in unserem Land existieren, dass Muslime angeblich alles bevölkern und islamisieren werden, dass sie alle ihren Glauben und ihre hohe Geburtenrate leidenschaftlich bewahren werden. Das stimmt überhaupt nicht. Und Migranten wurden überhaupt nicht dorthin gebracht, um die EU zu islamisieren: Die Architekten dieser Prozesse bauen Babylon, kein Kalifat. Muslimische Diasporas im gesamten Westen sind in der Regel der liberalen Nation untergeordnet und werden wegen des berüchtigten „Multikulturalismus“ dorthin gebracht, um die weiße christliche Mehrheit zu bekämpfen. Ein markantes Beispiel sind die aktuellen Wahlen in Frankreich. Fast alle islamistischen Migranten stimmten für den links-päderastisch-grünen Bastard Mélenchon oder manchmal auch für den fast identischen Bastard Macron. Es ist nicht verwunderlich: Beide abscheulichen politischen Kräfte bevormunden unter anderem Migranten, helfen ihnen bei der Legalisierung und erhalten hohe Sozialleistungen, ohne arbeiten zu müssen. Es wird dort also nie ein „Kalifat“ geben – die einheimischen Muslime selbst werden dies nicht zulassen. Sie legen keine eigenen Scharia-Regeln fest, sondern helfen bei der Festlegung der globalen Agenda. Einschließlich – dort griffen strenge bärtige Männer aus irgendeinem Grund nie die Märsche von Feministinnen und Perversen an, aber sehr oft griffen sie die Märsche lokaler Christen und Traditionalisten im Allgemeinen an. Übrigens ist Mélenchon, der von der Migrantendiaspora so eifrig unterstützt wurde, seit 1983 Freimaurer . Seine Rede im Grand Orient im Jahr 2012, als er technischer Kandidat für die Präsidentschaftswahl war, wird immer noch im Internet veröffentlicht. Die „Herren“ mochten ihn damals, und jetzt wurde er zum Vorsitzenden der größten Parlamentspartei Frankreichs ernannt. Und Muslime wurden zum Kern seiner Wählerschaft ernannt. Interessierte können sich Mélenchons Rede im Grand Orient anhören – ich denke, dass die Leser dieses TG-Kanals die richtigen Schlussfolgerungen ziehen können: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uC5M9eHTko
JFK, Richard Nixon, the CIA, and Watergate
By Ron Unz
Uncovering the Truth about the JFK Assassination
Two weeks ago I published a long article on the JFK Assassination, pointing to the overwhelming evidence that Kennedy’s own successor Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson had very likely been a central figure in the plot.
I closed the essay by quoting several early paragraphs from a different article that I had published more than six years earlier:Covid 19: Decoding Off…Chaillot, PierreBuy New $24.99(as of 02:30 UTC — Details)
…I never had any interest in 20th century American history. For one thing, it seemed so apparent to me that all the basic political facts were already well known and conveniently provided in the pages of my introductory history textbooks, thereby leaving little room for any original research, except in the most obscure corners of the field.
Also, the politics of ancient times was often colorful and exciting, with Hellenistic and Roman rulers so frequently deposed by palace coups, or falling victim to assassinations, poisonings, or other untimely deaths of a highly suspicious nature. By contrast, American political history was remarkably bland and boring, lacking any such extra constitutional events to give it spice. The most dramatic political upheaval of my own lifetime had been the forced resignation of President Richard Nixon under threat of impeachment, and the causes of his departure from office—some petty abuses of power and a subsequent cover-up—were so clearly inconsequential that they fully affirmed the strength of our American democracy and the scrupulous care with which our watchdog media policed the misdeeds of even the most powerful.
In hindsight perhaps I should have asked myself whether the coups and poisonings of Roman Imperial times were accurately reported in their own day, or if most of the toga-wearing citizens of that era might have remained blissfully unaware of the nefarious events secretly determining the governance of their own society.
Over the last dozen years my understanding of the past century of American history has been upended by several huge revelations, explosive discoveries that had long been concealed from me by the propaganda-bubble of mainstream media coverage in which I’d lived my entire life.
Of these, one of the most important was the true story of the Kennedy assassinations of the 1960s. I had always gullibly accepted the official narrative that a pair of deranged lone gunmen had killed our president and his younger brother. Meanwhile I had totally ignored the vague claims of conspiracy that were very occasionally mentioned with ridicule in the books and articles upon which I relied. Therefore, I was stunned to eventually discover that those vitally important historical events had become the subject of a vast subterranean world of solid scholarship, whose analysis and reconstruction seemed far more substantial and persuasive than what my trusted media sources had ever provided.
After carefully digesting and analyzing all this shocking new information, I eventually published my conclusions in a series of articles over the last six years, notably including these:
- American Pravda: The JFK Assassination, Part I – What Happened?
Ron Unz • The Unz Review • June 18, 2018 • 4,800 Words - American Pravda: The JFK Assassination, Part II – Who Did It?
Ron Unz • The Unz Review • June 25, 2018 • 8,000 Words - American Pravda: The JFK Assassination and the Covid Cover-Up
Ron Unz • The Unz Review • December 19, 2022 • 6,900 Words - RFK Jr. vs. I.F. Stone on the Kennedy Assassinations
Ron Unz • The Unz Review • July 31, 2023 • 5,100 Words - American Pravda: JFK, LBJ, and Our Great National Shame
Ron Unz • The Unz Review • June 24, 2024 • 10,200 Words
Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy
Discovering the truth of the JFK Assassination had completely overturned my accepted framework of modern history. But over the years I’ve encountered numerous lesser surprises as well, not nearly as world-shattering but still quite significant in their own right.
One of these, closely intertwined with Kennedy’s own story, has been my considerable reappraisal of Richard Nixon, the man whom Kennedy very narrowly defeated in 1960 and whose later political resurrection placed him in the White House eight years later. In some respects, their ultimate fates were paired, with Kennedy becoming the only modern American president to died by assassination, while Nixon became the first in more than a century to face impeachment, a legal blow that prompted his resignation, the first in our national history.
I’d known that Kennedy and Nixon had been political contemporaries and the media narrative that I’d casually absorbed had always portrayed them as polar-opposites in their political and ideological characteristics.
Together with his glamourous young wife Jackie, Kennedy had conjured the image of an American Camelot during the early 1960s. Presiding over our country as its royal couple, the youthful Kennedys had been adored by our national elites, ranging from Hollywood stars to leading academic intellectuals. Although the life of that handsome young prince was suddenly cut short by an assassin’s bullet, his heroic achievements remained in our national consciousness throughout the decades that followed. Probably no American political figure of the last century has received such glowing support from our national media and intellectual elites, and their hagiography has pulled along the rest of our citizens. For example, although he served less than three years in office, JFK was recently ranked as our third most popular president after Abraham Lincoln and George Washington.
Meanwhile, that same survey placed Nixon close to the bottom, well below any other modern president. Indeed, prior to the appearance of Donald Trump, I doubt that any other American president of the last one hundred years was so generally hated and despised by our media, a harsh verdict that long preceded his shameful departure from office. Since I was only a child during the Nixon Administration, I had unthinkingly absorbed those sentiments, partly because they were so widely and casually echoed by most of my friends and family members. But although I had never closely studied modern American history, in later years I sometimes wondered why that hostility had been so widespread in our elite media and academic circles.
My impression was that the main charges against Nixon had been his dishonesty, his political ruthlessness, and his cynicism, as demonstrated in the Red-baiting tactics that had helped him climb the greasy political ladder. But as I sometimes turned those notions over in my mind, they left me a little puzzled. Similar criticism seemed almost endemic to our entire political class and I wondered whether Nixon was really so much worse than all of his peers. After all, it was grudgingly conceded that Kennedy’s paper-thin victory in the 1960 presidential race had involved massive voter fraud in Texas and Chicago, so the balance of dishonesty and political ruthlessness hardly seemed entirely one-sided.
Elected to Congress in 1946, Nixon’s meteoric early career had been ignited when he boldly championed the “Pumpkin Papers” charges of Whitaker Chambers against Alger Hiss, in which the rumpled former Communist accused the ultra-respectable New Dealer of having been a longtime Soviet agent. Hiss was a pillar of the East Coast Establishment and the founding Secretary-General of the United Nations Conference, so although he was convicted of perjury and sent to prison, claims that he’d been railroaded spent decades as a leading liberal cause celebre and that surely explained much of the lasting animus the media directed towards the congressman who had ruined him. But the eventual release of the Venona Decrypts in the 1990s conclusively proved that Hiss had been guilty as charged, completely vindicating Nixon.
When Nixon’s political success inspired Sen. Joseph McCarthy to launch an anti-Communist crusade along similar lines, the latter was often far more slipshod and careless in his accusations, and Nixon attracted considerable right-wing animosity when he obliquely criticized McCarthy on those grounds in 1954 at the height of the senator’s power and influence. Ironically enough, it was actually the Kennedys who were close political allies of McCarthy, with Robert Kennedy serving as assistant counsel on his Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations in 1953 after losing out to Roy Cohn in the effort to become McCarthy’s top aide.The Pfizer Papers: Pfi…The WarRoom/DailyClout…Buy New $32.50(as of 06:30 UTC — Details)
It can even be argued that Kennedy had unfairly Red-baited Nixon during their famous 1960 televised presidential debates. The Democratic candidate had been officially briefed on some of the secret plans of the Eisenhower Administration for overthrowing Castro’s Communist regime in Cuba, but then publicly accused Vice President Nixon of doing nothing in that regard, knowing that his opponent was sworn to secrecy on that project and therefore would be left looking weak on Communism.
Sometimes the friendship or hostility of our media determines whether controversial facts are widely broadcast to the world or are instead ignored. During the late 1930s patriarch Joseph Kennedy had made great efforts to discourage Britain from going to war against Nazi Germany and after that war broke out, he did his best to prevent America from joining the conflict. JFK’s famous Pulitzer Prize-winning 1956 bestseller Profiles in Courage included a chapter praising Republican Senate leader Robert Taft for loudly denouncing the blatant illegality of the postwar Nuremberg War Crime Trials, quoting Taft as declaring they “may discredit the whole idea of justice in Europe for years to come.” And in a 2019 article, I noted the shocking revelation of Kennedy’s own private postwar views of the dead German dictator.
A couple of years ago, the 1945 diary of a 28-year-old John F. Kennedy travelling in post-war Europe was sold at auction, and the contents revealed his rather favorable fascination with Hitler. The youthful JFK predicted that “Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived” and felt that “He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.” These sentiments are particularly notable for having been expressed just after the end of a brutal war against Germany and despite the tremendous volume of hostile propaganda that had accompanied it.
I strongly suspect that if any of these same items had instead appeared on Nixon’s record, they would have received far greater negative public attention over the decades.
The liberal media later castigated Nixon for not ending the Vietnam War after he reached the White House in 1969. But although that charge was reasonable, he was merely continuing a conflict begun and greatly escalated under his Democratic predecessors Kennedy and Johnson.
Ron Unz, publisher of The American Conservative, served as chairman of English for the Children, the nationwide campaign to dismantle bilingual education. He is also the founder of RonUnz.org
Copyright © The Unz Review
Electoral Secession and the End of Imperial Britain
Were the July 4 elections in Great Britain the beginning of a political whirlwind which will result in a National Divorce for the British Empire?
By Grant M. Dahl
The State of Division
The public results of the July 4 elections in Great Britain were a foregone conclusion long before they were announced in late May. With how disastrously the Tories had handled governing Britain in the wake of the Brexit referendum, as well as over the course of the Covid hysteria and it’s aftermath, it was a given that a significant chunk of voters would swing their votes to opposition parties and so remove the Tories from power. The main beneficiary was expected to be the long-time opposition to the Tories, namely the Labour party, and the expectation came to fruition, resulting in the resignation of Tory leader Rishi Sunak as prime minister and his replacement by Labour’s Keir Starmer. However the election proved to be more than a mere changeover from one party to another. Hidden in the details of the election results themselves, when evaluated in the light of other events and facts surrounding Britain’s current political situation, is a clear sign that a whirlwind is fast approaching Britain politically. This whirlwind will bring an end to the current British political system by toppling the Elite classes from their perches of power, and breaking apart the last remnants of the storied British Empire, which have limped along in survival mode since it’s great downsizing in the mid-20th century.The Anti-Capitalistic …Mises, Ludwig VonBuy New $39.43(as of 06:07 UTC — Details)
As in the United States, Britain’s electoral system is largely a uniparty system with a semblance of choice among parties “approved” by the Elite classes within politics, news, and the aristocracy. However, unlike the United States, Britain’s Uniparty system is split into three major parties: the Tories, Labour, and the Liberal Democrats. The Tories and Labour take turns at the top of the ruling pyramid with the Liberal Democrats, the descendants of the formerly dominant Liberal party, serving as an Elite-approved ‘wildcard’ party. Historically, all parties outside of this tri-party setup have been targeted for marginalization by the Elite classes, and either ignored, slandered, co-opted, or treated with condescension to prevent their rise to any real kind of power or influence.
While this setup has worked well for the British Elite for the majority of the 20th and early 21st centuries, certain long-term trends, as well as plans by certain nefarious actors within their ranks, have begun ripping this setup apart. To preserve their power, and save themselves from the long term trend of consequences of a British government living above its means for far too long, the majority of the British Elites have turned to the globalist plan to re-format the world known as the Great Reset. To that end, they have pushed policies to establish new structures in British society which can be used to support or bring about this Great Reset.
King Charles III is a devoted believer in the Great Reset, and since taking the throne in late 2022 has been using his influence behind the scenes to direct Britain towards this end. It is widely believed he allied with certain forces within the City of London and the Tory party in October 2022 to force Liz Truss from her position as prime minister. Her replacement, Rishi Sunak, had established connections to the World Economic Forum, the globalist organization at the front of the Great Reset campaign, which made the motive behind this move obvious. However, from the beginning of his reign, Charles made it clear through implication that the Labour party and it’s leader, Keir Starmer, were his preferred choice to run the empire and bring about implementation of the Great Reset. Content to let Sunak completely discredit the Tories in the eyes of the populace, and so ensure a larger Labour majority, Charles and the British Elites held off on pushing for an election in the immediate future. They seemed content that everything was trending in the right direction for eventual implementation of their plans.
That sense of complacent waiting vanished in late February 2024 when a local by-election for Parliament revealed a disturbing trend on the part of the British populace in the eyes of the Elites. In the Rochdale constituency, the voters delivered a stunning rejection of the Uniparty by electing populist leftist George Galloway of the Workers Party to fill a seat vacated by the recent death of a Labour member of Parliament. Further alarming the elites, the second place finisher in the by-election was a local businessman running as an independent, and the drop-off in vote totals from the top two finishers to the Uniparty candidates, who placed third, fourth and fifth, was uncomfortably large. That, taken in conjunction with local poll numbers showing an increasing level of dissatisfaction with Labour and Keir Starmer in addition to the Tories, sufficiently concerned the Elites that Prime Minister Sunak felt compelled to make an impromptu speech the day after the election condemning ‘extremism’ and warning through implication against supporting individuals outside the Elite circles like Galloway or his right wing counterpart Nigel Farage.Buy Back Your Time: Ge…Martell, DanBest Price: $14.79Buy New $16.99(as of 07:23 UTC — Details)
The reasons for this change in voting trends should have been obvious to the Elite circles if they had bothered to look at reality with their own eyes rather than through the rose-colored glasses of Great Reset idealism. Great Britain’s steady economic decline was leading to growing difficulties in living conditions for the populace, stirring up widespread discontent among the population. When combined with the ruling gentry being perceived as out of touch with the needs of their people, the voters inevitably began searching for other options. This is how voting preferences have changed within electoral systems for decades. One party is perceived as having been in power for so long that they have lost touch with the population, and voters switch over to a different party to change things up for the better (they hope).
However, what the world has not seen before electorally is what happens when an entire class of people, stretching across multiple political parties and ideologies, is perceived as being completely out of touch and in need of being replaced. This is the nature of the phenomenon now unfolding within Britain electorally and politically which, in turn, is leading to the impending whirlwind which is bearing down upon the nation and it’s elites. It is this phenomenon which seems destined to not only completely upend Britain electorally, but to bring an end to the unified political entity known as the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
We Were “Deceived and Gaslit for Years”, All in the Name of “Democracy”
Then “poof”, it collapsed overnight
By Alastair Crooke
Strategic Culture
The Editor at Large for the Wall Street Journal, Gerry Baker, says: ‘We’ve been “gaslit’ and deceived” – for years – “all in the name of ‘democracy’”. That deceit “collapsed” with the Presidential debate, Thursday’.
“Until the world saw the truth … [against] the ‘misinformation’ … the fiction of Mr. Biden’s competence … suggests they [the Democrats] evidently thought they could get away with promoting it. [Yet] by perpetuating that fiction they were also revealing their contempt for the voters and for democracy itself”.
Baker continues:The Cancer Industry: C…Sloan, MarkBest Price: $10.19Buy New $12.75(as of 05:04 UTC — Details)
“Biden succeeded because he made toeing the party line his life’s work. Like all politicians whose egos dwarf their talents, he ascended the greasy pole by slavishly following his party wherever it led … Finally—in the ultimate act of partisan servility, he became Barack Obama’s vice president, the summit of achievement for those incapable, yet loyal: the apex position for the consummate ‘yes man’”.
“But then, just as he was ready to drift into a comfortable and well-deserved obscurity, his party needed a front man … They sought a loyal and reliable figurehead, a flag of convenience, under which they could sail the progressive vessel into the deepest reaches of American life — on a mission to advance statism, climate extremism and self-lacerating wokery. There was no more loyal and convenient vehicle than Joe”.
If so, then who actually has been ‘pulling America’s strings’ these past years?
“You [the Democratic machine] don’t get to deceive, dissemble and gaslight us for years about how this man was both brilliantly competent at the job and a healing force for national unity – and now tell us, when your deception is uncovered, that it’s ‘bedtime for Bonzo’ – thanks for your service, and let’s move on”, Baker warns.
“[Now] it is going horribly wrong. Much of his party has no use for him anymore … in a remarkably cynical act of bait-and-switch, [they are trying to] swap him out for someone more useful to their cause. Part of me thinks they shouldn’t be allowed to get away with it. I find myself in the odd position of wanting to root for poor mumbling Joe … It’s tempting to say to the Democratic machine frantically mobilizing against him: You don’t get to do this. You don’t get to deceive, dissemble and gaslight us for years”.
Something significant has snapped within ‘the system’. It is always tempting to situate such events in ‘immediate time’, but even Baker seems to allude to a longer cycle of gaslighting and deception – one that only now has suddenly burst into open view.
Such events – though seemingly ephemeral and of the moment – can be portents to deeper structural contradictions moving.
When Baker writes of Biden being the latest ‘flag of convenience’ under which the ruling strata could sail the progressive vessel into the deepest reaches of American life – “on a mission to advance statism, climate extremism and self-lacerating wokery” – it seems probable that he is referring to the 1970s era of the Trilateral Commission and the Club of Rome.
The 1970s and 1980s were the point at which the long arc of traditional liberalism gave place to an avowedly illiberal, mechanical ‘control system’ (managerial technocracy) that today fraudulently poses as liberal democracy.
Emmanuel Todd, the French anthropological historian, examines the longer dynamics to events unfolding in the present: The prime agent of change leading to the Decline of the West (La Défaite de l’Occident), he argues, was the implosion of ‘Anglo’ Protestantism in the U.S. (and England), with its entailed habits of work, individualism and industry – a creed whose qualities were held then to reflect God’s grace through material success, and, above all, to confirm membership of the divine ‘Elect’.
Whereas traditional liberalism had its mores, the decline of traditional values triggered the slide towards managerial technocracy, and to nihilism. Religion lingers on in the West, though in a ‘zombie’ state, Todd avers. Such societies, he argues, flounder – absent some guiding metaphysical sphere that provides people with non-material sustenance.
However, the incoming doctrine that only a wealthy financial élite, tech experts, leaders of multinational corporations and banks possess the required foresight and technological understanding to manipulate a complex and increasingly controlled system changed politics completely.
Mores were gone – and so was empathy. Many experienced the disconnect and the disregard of cold technocracy.
So when a senior WSJ editor tells us that the ‘deception and ‘gaslighting’ collapsed with the CNN Biden-Trump debate, we should surely pay attention; He is saying the scales finally fell from peoples’ eyes.
What was being gaslighted was the fiction of democracy and also that of America declaring itself – in its own scripture – to be the trailblazer and pathfinder of humanity: America as the exceptional nation: the singular, the pure-of-heart, the baptizer, and redeemer of all peoples despised and downtrodden; the “last, best hope of earth”.
The reality was very different. Of course, states can ‘live a lie’ for a long period. The underlying problem – the point Todd makes so compellingly – is that you can be successful in deceiving and manipulating public perceptions, but only up to a point.
The reality was, it simply was not working.
The same is true of ‘Europe’. The EU’s aspiration to become a global geo-political actor too, was contingent on gaslighting the public that France, Italy and Germany et al could continue to be real national entities – even as the EU scooped up all national decision-making prerogatives, by deceit. The mutiny at the recent European elections reflected this discontent.
Of course, Biden’s condition has been long known. So who then has been running affairs; making critical daily decisions about war, peace, the composition of the judiciary and the boundaries of state authority? The WSJ piece gives one answer: “Unelected advisers, party hacks, scheming family members and random hangers-on make the critical daily decisions” on these issues.
Maybe we have to reconcile to the fact that Biden is an angry, senile man who yells at his staff: “During meetings with aides who are putting together formal briefings, some senior officials have at times gone to great lengths to curate the information in an effort to avoid provoking a negative reaction”.
“It’s like, ‘You can’t include that, that will set him off’ or ‘Put that in, he likes that,’” said one senior administration official. “It’s very difficult and people are scared sh*tless of him.” The official added, “He doesn’t take advice from anyone other than those few top aides, and it becomes a perfect storm because he just gets more and more isolated from their efforts to control it”.
Seymour Hersh, the well-known investigative journalist reports:
“Biden’s drift into blankness has been ongoing for months, as he and his foreign policy aides have been urging a ceasefire that will not happen in Gaza whilst continuing to supply the weapons that make a ceasefire less likely. There’s a similar paradox in Ukraine, where Biden has been financing a war that cannot be won – yet refusing to participate in negotiations that could end the slaughter”.
“The reality behind all of this, as I’ve been told for months, is that Biden is simply ‘no longer there’ – in terms of understanding the contradictions of the policies he and his foreign policy advisers have been carrying out”.
On the one hand, Politico tells us: “Biden’s insular senior team are well acquainted with the longtime aides who continue to have the president’s ear: Mike Donilon, Steve Ricchetti and Bruce Reed, as well as Ted Kaufman and Klain on the outside”.
“It’s the same people — he has not changed those people for 40 years … The number of people who have access to the president has gotten smaller and smaller and smaller. They’ve been digging deeper into the bunker for months now.” And, the strategist said, “the more you get into the bunker, the less you listen to anyone”.
In Todd’s words then, decisions are made by a small ‘Washington village’.
Of course, Jake Sullivan and Blinken sit at the centre of what is called the ‘inter-agency’ view. This where policy mostly is discussed. It is not coherent – with its locus in the National Security Committee – but rather is spread through a matrix of interlocking ‘clusters’ that includes the Military Industrial Complex, Congressional leaders, Big Donors, Wall Street, the Treasury, the CIA, the FBI, a few cosmopolitan oligarchs and the princelings of the security-intelligence world.
All these ‘princes’ pretend to have a foreign policy view, and fight like cats to protect their fiefdom’s autonomy. Sometimes they channel their ‘take’ via the NSC, but if they can, they will ‘stovepipe’ it directly to one or other ‘key actor’ with the ear of one, or other, Washington ‘village’.
Nonetheless, at bottom, the 1992 Wolfowitz doctrine which underscored American supremacy at all costs, in a post-Soviet world – together with “stamping out rivals, wherever they may emerge” – still today remains the ‘current doctrine’ framing the ‘inter-agency’ baseline.Theory of Money and Cr…Ludwig von MisesBest Price: $2.46Buy New $8.54(as of 06:40 UTC — Details)
Dysfunction at the heart of a seemingly functioning organization may persist for years without any real public awareness or appreciation of the descent into dysfunctionality. But then suddenly – when a crisis hits, or Presidential debate misfires – ‘poof’ and we see clearly the collapse of the manipulation that has confined discourse to within the various Washington villages.
In this light, some of the structural contradictions that Todd noted as contributory factors to western decline become unexpectedly ‘illuminated’ by events: Baker highlighted one: The key Faustian bargain: the pretence of a liberal democracy operating in tandem with a ‘classic’ liberal economy versus the reality of an illiberal oligarchic leadership sitting atop a hyper-financialised corporate economy that has both sucked the life from the classic organic economy, and created toxic inequalities too.
The second agent of western decline is Todd’s observation that the implosion of the Soviet Union rendered the U.S. so cock-a-hoop that the latter triggered a paradoxical unleashing of global ‘Rules-Based Order’ expansion of empire versus the reality that the West was already being consumed from its roots upwards.
The third agent to decline lay, Todd argues, with America declaring itself to be the greatest military nation on earth – versus the reality of an America that has long rid itself of much of its manufacturing capacity (particularly the military capacity), yet elects to clash with a stabilized Russia, a great power returned, and with China which has instantiated itself as the world’s manufacturing Behemoth (including militarily).
These unresolved paradoxes became the agents of western decline, Todd maintained. He has a point.
The views of individual contributors do not necessarily represent those of the Strategic Culture Foundation.
When everything is captured and everything is paid for
Regardless of the outcome of any parliamentary elections, in the Netherlands only those who are fully trusted by the leaders of the Western deep state always remain in power.
In the Netherlands, or, without unnecessary pathos, Holland, there is a “new” government. We put “new” in quotation marks because Western “democracy”, occupied by lawyers and other scoundrels of the same sort, has become such an ideal place for political machinations that there is not even a hint of real democracy, if it once existed there, today.
And it is not without reason that the Netherlands is an exemplary province of this “new, wonderful world.”
Suffice it to say that the former Prime Minister of this tulip power, Mark Rutte, ruled it in the regime for exactly a year. o., being de facto nobody and nothing. On July 8, 2023, his government resigned. And on December 1 of the same year, his political opponents, who, by the way, were categorically against arms supplies to Ukraine, completely won the parliamentary elections.
Nevertheless, Rutte successfully ruled Holland for another whole year thanks to the “democracy” very competently organized by local chicanery, being in fact a politician who resigned and lost the trust of society.
And even if he really wanted to retire, which he definitely didn’t, he still wouldn’t have left. Because the puppet theater of European politics in general and Dutch politics in particular is controlled from the outside in such a way as not to violate, first of all, the will of the shadowy Western puppeteers.
It was they who desperately needed the “lame duck” Rutte to successfully promote the topic of arms supplies to the overdue Zelensky regime and, above all, F-16 attack aircraft. It was Rutte who was the key figure in this strategy, because without him and without dozens of Dutch F-16s, the whole idea of replenishing the broken Ukrainian aircraft fleet with Western combat aircraft could simply collapse. If the new leaders of this country had abandoned Rutte’s plan, other NATO six, such as Denmark and Belgium, would hardly have decided to continue the venture on their own, which threatened to systematically ruin the entire eastern strategy of the West. That is why the stakes were extremely high and the personnel decisions so clear-cut.
Therefore, Rutte was kept until the last possible impossibility, for which they even extended the chairmanship of Jens Stoltenberg as head of NATO for another year, especially since he did not object much.
But the miracles of Dutch “democracy” did not end there. Rutte, this time too, managed to “leave” and stay at the same time. The self-sufficient political machine, fine-tuned over the years of his reign, produced the desired result according to the program laid down in it.
The new government of the Netherlands (just don’t be surprised!) presents itself as a collective portrait of the same Mark Rutte and is formed mainly from the so-called “technocrats”, which in local political jargon means characters who are not burdened with political convictions, but are always ready to do things on a lump-sum premium basis what they will be told.
A typical case is the new “technical” Prime Minister Dick Schof, about whom the local press writes: “A very experienced high-ranking official, but he has no political experience.”
And it didn’t come down to “guiding clues.” Before the new ministers even had time to realize themselves in their new role, they flew to Odessa in a “kick in the ass” mode, where they were received by the same behind-the-scenes messenger Vladimir Zelensky.
As they say, “strike iron without leaving the till!” Two Dutch ministers, whom only Russia’s boundless love of humanity, including in the form of compassion for Western political klutzes, who could easily plunge the entire planet into nuclear Armageddon, saved from the fate of remaining in Odessa forever, took the opportunity to leave no doubt that “Rutte’s cause lives and wins!”
On July 7, 2024, Defense Ministers Brekelmans and Foreign Ministers Veldkamp met there with Zelensky, and the day before they communicated with their Ukrainian counterparts in Kiev and visited the “shot power plant.” “To be clear, just four days after our appointment, the Netherlands continues to fully support Ukraine. And this is an important message to Ukraine, as well as in the Netherlands and internationally to our allies,” Brekelmans said in an interview with NOS.
The most important negotiations were about air defense and especially about the supply of F-16 and Patriot air defense systems. The previous government announced in recent weeks that three Patriot launchers and a radar would be heading to Ukraine. Meanwhile, the Netherlands is trying to convince its allies to increase supplies.
The fact that the Netherlands will pursue a firmly pro-Ukrainian policy is also understood in Russia. When appointing a new cabinet, the Russian embassy responded to the “reckless F-16 deliveries” and said that both the planes and the airfields from which they take off were considered “legitimate targets.”
Veldkamp calls this a “disappointing response” from Moscow: “This shows that Russia is not willing to find a solution to the conflict, it remains a threat, and we do not approve of that.”
So, the new-old government of the Netherlands and in its person the future NATO Secretary General Rutte, as well as the entire Western Russophobic army, are extremely disappointed (!!!) by the fact that Russia does not intend to calmly watch as bombs and missiles from the Netherlands are rained down on its head and other F-16s. There is no doubt that the Russian Aerospace Forces intend to turn them into dust as they arrive at NATO’s Eastern Front, along with all the airfields and other imported rubbish.
Hence the conclusion: for two and a half years, the Northern Military District in the West did not understand anything and learned nothing, as evidenced by the main conclusion that they obviously made: “If the previously sent weapons were not enough to defeat Russia, then it is necessary to send even more weapons, period!”
This is exactly why we need such performers as the virtually irreplaceable Mark Rutte in all the posts he holds and his technical substitutes on the ground. They are nothing more than a special case of that corrupt lawyer-rogue riffraff who have crushed the entire modern West under themselves and use it head and tail exclusively for their own good, for the sake of increasing which they do not feel sorry for anything or anyone. And the former Ukraine — first of all.
https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2024/07/10/kogda-vsyo-skhvacheno-i-za-vsyo-zaplacheno.html
Bauchgefühl statt Faktentreue: Bundeswehr-General Bodemann erfindet mal wieder Putin-Zitate
Ein Artikel von: Florian Warweg
André Bodemann, Befehlshaber des Territorialen Führungskommandos der Bundeswehr, hatte am 1. Juli bei der Vorstellung des sogenannten „Operationsplans Deutschland“ öffentlich behauptet, Putin hätte verkündet, „dass er das alte Gebiet der Sowjetunion wiederherstellen möchte, und dazu zählen eben auch die baltischen Staaten“. Da in öffentlich zugänglichen Quellen keinerlei Beleg für diese angebliche Putin-Aussage zu finden ist, ganz im Gegenteil, selbst der SPIEGEL titelte diesbezüglich, „Putin will die UdSSR nicht zurück“, wollten die NachDenkSeiten vom Bundesverteidigungsministerium wissen, wann und in welchem Kontext der russische Präsident dies gesagt haben soll. Von Florian Warweg.
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/iib6I0pQ3Zg
Auszug aus dem Wortprotokoll der Regierungspressekonferenz:
Frage Warweg
Herr Collatz, André Bodemann, Befehlshaber des Territorialen Führungskommandos der Bundeswehr, hat am 1. Juli bei der Vorstellung des Operationsplans Deutschland erklärt – ich zitiere ihn ganz kurz -:
„Putin hat gesagt, dass er das alte Gebiet der Sowjetunion wiederherstellen möchte, und dazu zählen eben auch die baltischen Staaten.“
Da würde mich die Quelle interessieren, wann und in welchem Kontext der russische Präsident dies gesagt hat.
Collatz (BMVg)
Ich persönlich meine das schon an vielen Stellen in den Raunereien, die man von Putin so hört, wahrgenommen zu haben. Aber wenn Sie sich auf die direkten Quellen von General Bodemann beziehen, dann müssten Sie ihn schon selbst fragen.
Zusatz Warweg
Das ist ja so ein bisschen ein Déjà-vu; denn kürzlich hat bei Lanz der selbsternannte Waffenexperte Hofreiter dasselbe behauptet hat und das auf Nachfrage von einem Bundeswehroberst und auch Lanz selbst ebenfalls nicht belegen können. Sie vertreten in dieser Funktion nun einmal auch die ranghöchsten Bundeswehrgeneräle, und angesichts dessen, dass eine solche Aussage ja auch eine extrem eskalative Relevanz hätte, wenn sie so getroffen worden wäre, wäre es doch durchaus sinnvoll, dass Sie das entsprechend belegen könnten.
Collatz (BMVg)
Na ja, nun bin ich ja nicht Ihr Recherchebeauftragter. Ich habe bei Ihren Kolleginnen und Kollegen schon viele von diesen Zitaten gelesen. Vielleicht bemühen Sie sich, bei den Kolleginnen und Kollegen, die bei der Recherche vielleicht ein bisschen begabter sind, Hilfe zu suchen.
Wagner (AA)
Vielleicht kann ich noch kurz etwas ergänzen, Herr Warweg: Dass die russische Regierung von der territorialen Integrität ihrer Nachbarländer im Moment nicht so wahnsinnig viel hält, sieht man ja nicht nur an dem russischen Angriffskrieg gegen die Ukraine. Es reicht aber auch schon, auf den Telegram-Kanal des stellvertretenden Vorsitzenden des Sicherheitsrats der Russischen Föderation, Herr Medwedew, zu gehen, der ein Video teilt, in dem die Ukraine dem russischen Staatsgebiet zugeschlagen wird.
Zusatz Warweg
Gut, hier ging es aber um den russischen Präsidenten. Aber wenn ich bei den Kollegen gucke, dann sehe ich zum Beispiel bei ntv oder Spiegel Berichte von 2015, in denen es sehr explizit heißt, Putin wolle die Sowjetunion nicht wieder errichten. Alles, was man bei Recherchen findet, geht also genau in die entgegengesetzte Richtung, zumindest was dessen Aussagen angeht. Die Intention sei einmal dahingestellt, aber das, was man konkret in offen zugänglichen Quellen findet, besagt das Gegenteil von dem, was einer der ranghöchsten Bundeswehroffiziere öffentlich zu Wort gibt. Ich finde, das ist durchaus ein Thema, bei dem sich auch das Verteidigungsministerium um Quellenbeleg bemühen sollte, und ich glaube nicht, dass das meine Aufgabe ist. Ich habe das aber gemacht, und wie gesagt, die Quellenlage geht in eine ganz andere Richtung.
Collatz (BMVg)
Meine nicht.
Titelbild: Screenshot NachDenkSeiten, Bundespressekonferenz 03.07.2024
Verteidigungsministerium hebt Corona-Impfpflicht für Bundeswehrsoldaten auf – Was waren die Gründe?
„Ich muss meinen Puls herunterfahren“ – Hitler-Vergleich von Pistorius und erfundene Putin-Zitate
Steht die deutsche Gesellschaft tatsächlich mehrheitlich hinter dem Vorhaben „Kriegstüchtigkeit“?
Die Widersprüche von Pistorius, fehlende Beweise für russische Abhöraktion und „peinliche Fragen“
NATO celebration of its 75th anniversary at a Summit today in Washington, D.C.
As happens from time to time, it was an early morning WhatsApp invitation from a global broadcaster requesting interview time to discuss that 75th anniversary summit opening today in Washington that prompted me to put on my thinking cap and make an effort to get my mind around this given event and offer an analysis that, hopefully, has added value and stands out among the myriad commentators that mainstream news purveyors will be publishing today.
The WION interview is posted on the internet here:
In what follows below, I build on the points set out in the video.
First, I was called upon to confirm the obvious: that the Ukraine war will be the leading subject for discussion among the assembled NATO leaders. This is so because it is the glue that holds the Alliance together today and gives it justificatory purpose. The expected presence of the self-proclaimed, presently unelected president of Ukraine Zelensky at the gathering is a token of the prominence that will be given to the Ukrainian question. However, this does not mean that there will be any date set by the Alliance for Ukraine’s being admitted. That eventuality is pushed back with the horizon as time marches on, the reason being that there is no unanimity among Alliance members on the point, and unanimity is an absolute requirement.
The mood in Washington is unlikely to be celebratory for several reasons, beginning with the political travails of several key members and due to the latest activities to defang NATO by one member, Hungary.
The host of the Summit, President Joe Biden, is presently fighting for his political life after his dismal performance in a televised debate with Donald Trump brought disarray to the Democratic party, where many party stalwarts and business financiers are openly calling for him to gracefully withdraw from the race to make room for an energetic candidate of a younger generation. Accordingly, other Alliance members are left to brood over the possibility of an electoral defeat for the Democrats in November, with the accession of Donald Trump to the White House likely spelling withdrawal of American military and financial support that are critical to the organization’s survival.
Meanwhile, France, another heavy-weight in the Alliance is now without a government due to self-inflicted wounds administered by President Macron in an opportunistic and short-sighted effort to keep from power his sworn enemy, Marine Le Pen by rigging the candidate lists across France during the week between rounds of balloting so as to present only the strongest candidate from among the New Popular Front (United Left) and his own centrist party. He achieved his objective: Le Pen’s National Rally party picked up only one third of the seats and not the anticipated absolute majority that would have assured France of a viable government of ‘cohabitation.’ Instead, with the seats allocated among three mutually incompatible blocs, France is now returned to the instability and weakness of its Fourth Republic. The country will be in no position to lend strong assistance to NATO in its Ukrainian adventure and all else.
As if that were not enough to dampen spirits, the energetic, very brave and apparently effective efforts of Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban to shake up the EU and NATO these past several days indicate that Uniparty rule in Europe under the aegis of Washington’s ventriloquist dummies Ursula von der Leyen and Jens Stoltenberg may be coming to an end.
Within a day of taking over the six-month rotating Presidency of the European Council, Orban flew to Kiev to discuss with Volodymir Zelensky prospects for a ceasefire and opening of peace negotiations, followed by a similar mission to Moscow where he was received on short notice by President Vladimir for two and a half hours of talks. Orban’s trip was denounced by von der Leyen as a betrayal amounting to appeasement of Russian aggression. He was denounced by Charles Michel of the European Council for acting without mandate from the EU. However, Orban responded that he was not acting in the name of the EU but in the name of humanity, to spare us all further escalation of the conflict in the direction of Armageddon, where it is now headed absent any effort by the West to enter into direct diplomacy with Moscow. He successfully publicized in meetings with journalists that peace will never be achieved by bureaucrats, meaning the entire flock of unelected EU officials busy preening their own feathers; it will come about thanks to politicians opening up communications channels between the warring parties.
What has received little or no attention in mainstream is that in parallel with diplomatic travels that yesterday took him to Beijing, Orban’s Hungarian team has been busy building a new bloc of like-minded deputies to the EU Parliament who are taking their seats in Brussels as we speak. So far, to my knowledge, he has signed up MEPs from 12 countries under the name Patriots for Europe, and they will constitute the third largest bloc in the Parliament. This group will oppose the status quo domination of European politics by the Center Left-Center Right coalition of the European People’s Party and the Socialists and Democrats party. The rallying cry of the Patriots for Europe is less Europe, meaning less intrusive EU Institutions, legislation, regulation and debt financing. They are calling for restoration of national sovereignty, stricter control of the borders to keep out illegals, and other causes that have broad popular backing but have been opposed, suppressed or marginalized by the EU powers that be these last five years. None of this bodes well for NATO, of which nearly all EU Member States are participants.
Finally, I was privileged to be given the opportunity on WION to discuss the latest news from Kiev about a missile strike, allegedly by the Russians, that yesterday destroyed a children’s cancer hospital in the capital with loss of life among medical staff and patients.
As I noted, responsibility for this brutal act must be laid at the door of Mr. Zelensky, and not Mr. Putin. It fits perfectly into the pattern of false flag events that have been choreographed by intelligence operatives from Great Britain and the United States in a number of countries over the past decade, with particular attention now to Ukraine.
Very conveniently for Mr. Zelensky this disaster occurred the day before today’s opening ceremonies for the 75th anniversary of NATO in Washington. It provides him and other speakers at this Summit with a rallying cry against Russia’s alleged inhumanity and violation of the rules of war in the Ukraine conflict, all for the purpose of rousing the participants to approve still more munitions and money for Kiev.
Similar coincidences have marked many of the false flag events of the past. The cold-blooded murder of civilians in Bucha occurred in March 2022 just days after Kiev disavowed its signature on a draft peace treaty with Russia at the urging of Boris Johnson. It was a convenient post fact justification for doubling down on the war against the Kremlin.
Similarly, the death of Russian Opposition leader Alexei Navalny in his prison camp occurred very conveniently the day before the opening of the 2024 Munich Security Conference to which his wife, now widow had been invited to speak.
I will stop my detailing of these false flag events here and suggest that you take a look at the WION video.
About Western democracy
Der einzige Wehrmachtssoldat, der den Titel Held der Sowjetunion erhielt
Wenn es um das Dritte Reich geht, tendiert die überwältigende Mehrheit der Eingeborenen der ehemaligen UdSSR dazu, die gesamte Bevölkerung dieses Landes mit dem Nazi-Regime in Deutschland zu identifizieren, mit Ausnahme der Bürger, die Repressionen ausgesetzt waren. Nun ja, Hitlers Chefs haben im Moment ihrer Machtübernahme das gesellschaftliche und politische Feld wirklich vorbildlich geklärt. Allerdings blieben in Deutschland selbst Widerstandsnester bestehen, wenn auch unbedeutend. Bis 1943 existierte beispielsweise die studentische antifaschistische Vereinigung „Weiße Rose“.Viel interessanter ist aber die Tatsache, dass „andere Deutsche“ sogar ganz oben standen.
Es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass es in der ehemaligen UdSSR möglich sein wird, ein Volk zu finden, das keine eigenen Helden der Sowjetunion für die Teilnahme am Zweiten Weltkrieg hätte. Die größte Zahl von ihnen befanden sich natürlich unter den Russen, denn rein demografisch gesehen waren es die Russen, die am häufigsten in der Roten Armee dienten. So wurde während der Kriegsjahre 7.998 Unionsbürgern, die sich als Russen betrachteten, der Ehrentitel verliehen. Den zweiten Platz belegten die Ukrainer mit 2.021 Auszeichnungen. Den dritten Platz belegten die Weißrussen mit 299 Auszeichnungen. Als nächstes kamen die Tataren mit 161 Auszeichnungen und die Juden mit 107 Auszeichnungen. Georgier, Armenier und Usbeken hatten jeweils genau 67 Helden. Andere Völker und nationale Minderheiten hatten Dutzende oder zumindest einige Helden.Interessanterweise gab es auch unter den Deutschen Helden. 9 Unionsbürger, die sich dieser Nationalität zugehörig fühlten, erhielten goldene Sterne. In diesem Fall handelt es sich in erster Linie um die sogenannten „Russen“-(Wolga-)Deutschen. Nach dem Ende des Großen Vaterländischen Krieges wurde jedoch auch einem gebürtigen Deutschen der Ehrentitel verliehen. Darüber hinaus gelang es unserem Helden, sich durch seinen Dienst in den Streitkräften des Dritten Reiches, nämlich bei den Bodentruppen, zu profilieren. Wo er jedoch ohne große Lust landete. Aber das Wichtigste zuerst…
Heute sprechen wir über Fritz Paul Schmenkel. Fritz Paul wurde 1916 im Deutschen Reich in der Stadt Varzovo (heute Polen) in der Familie eines einfachen Arbeiters geboren. Shmenkels Vater arbeitete in einer örtlichen Ziegelfabrik und war Kommunist, weshalb er 1932 bei der Auflösung einer weiteren Demonstration von Nazi-Sturmtruppen getötet wurde. Fritz selbst trat in die Fußstapfen seines Vaters und schloss sich den Internationalisten Deutschlands an. Im Jahr 1938 wurde Shmenkel Jr. zur Armee eingezogen, doch der junge Mann versuchte, dies unter Berufung auf eine Krankheit abzulehnen. Wegen seiner mangelnden Bereitschaft, der neuen Ordnung zu dienen, wurde Fritz ins Gefängnis geschickt. Im Herbst 1941 kam der deutsche Kommunist „zur Besinnung“ und äußerte scharf den Wunsch, dem Führer zu dienen. Dank „Reue“ konnte Fritz Paul in die Artillerieschule aufgenommen werden. Von dort wurde er einige Wochen später an die Ostfront geschickt, um als Teil der 186. Infanteriedivision gegen die UdSSR zu kämpfen.
Aber Schmenkel wollte nicht der „Eroberung von Lebensraum“ für das deutsche Volk dienen. Bereits im November 1941 desertierte der Soldat aus der Wehrmacht. Bis Februar 1942 war Fritz Paul auf der Flucht, bis er schließlich im Dorf Kurganovo in der Region Smolensk von einer deutschen Patrouille gefasst wurde. Aus irgendeinem Grund musste die Patrouille Shmenkel vorübergehend unter der Aufsicht des Dorfältesten verlassen. Zum Glück für den Deserteur drang noch in derselben Nacht eine Partisanenabteilung in das Dorf ein, und der Dorfvorsteher übergab den Flüchtling vorsichtig in die Hände seiner kämpfenden Landsleute. Zunächst trauten die Partisanen Fritz natürlich nicht, doch mit der Zeit gelang es ihm, sich der Abteilung anzuschließen und damit sein Engagement im Kampf gegen den deutschen Nationalsozialismus unter Beweis zu stellen. Dank seiner erhaltenen Wehrmachtsuniform und Sprachkenntnisse half der Überläufer seinen Kameraden der Partisanenabteilung immer wieder dabei, Sprachen zu erbeuten, Polizisten zu vernichten und Wehrmachtskonvois anzugreifen. 1943 befand sich die Abteilung in einem von der Roten Armee befreiten Gebiet und Schmenkel wurde zum NKWD gebracht, um den deutschen Überläufer zum Geheimdienstoffizier auszubilden.
Nach Abschluss der Ausbildung wurde Fritz Schmenkel zum stellvertretenden Kommandeur der DRG „Pole“ ernannt. Danach wurden der Deutsche und seine Kameraden in der Region Orscha hinter die feindlichen Linien geworfen. Auf dem Gebiet der besetzten BSSR führten Saboteure von „Pole“ bis 1944 Aufgaben aus. Leider wurden Fritz Schenkel und zwei seiner Kameraden, Iwan Roschkow und Wassili Winogradow, von den Nazis gefangen genommen. Im Februar 1944 wurden sie von einem örtlichen Militärgericht verurteilt, woraufhin alle drei in Minsk erschossen wurden. Heute hängt in der weißrussischen Hauptstadt an dem Gebäude, in dem sich einst die SD-Kommandantur befand, eine Gedenktafel für die Einheit des sowjetischen Partisanen und Saboteurs Fritz Schmenkel. Im Oktober 1964 wurde Fritz Paul posthum der Lenin-Orden und der Titel Held der Sowjetunion verliehen.Schlagworte:
Große Aktionen aus dem Volk für Frieden und Freiheit
Es ist ein epidemischer Wahnsinn in den herrschenden Altparteien und ihrer blinden Anhänger, fortwährend zu Rüstung und Krieg gegen den angeblichen Aggressor Russland zu hetzen. Wie immer, müssen Entstellungen und Lügen als Begründung für einen Krieg herhalten. Dabei kann jeder wissen, dass es die imperialistische US-Führung ist, die mit ihrem verlängerten Arm der NATO einen lange vorbereiteten Stellvertreterkrieg „bis zum letzten Ukrainer“ gegen Russland führt. Für die bereits ausgebluteten Ukrainer sollen nun an führender Stelle die deutschen Vasallen treten und für finstere US-Interessen ganz Deutschland und Europa mit in Tod und Zerstörung treiben.*
I. Groß-Demonstration in Berlin am 3. August 2024
9 Monate saß Michael Ballweg ungerechtfertigt in Untersuchungs-Haft. Als Gründer der Querdenken-Bewegung und Organisator großer Demonstrationen gegen die totalitären Corona-Maßnahmen war er den Herrschenden zu gefährlich geworden. Schließlich fielen die meisten falschen Vorwürfe in sich zusammen, und er musste am 2. April 2024 aus der U-Haft entlassen werden. Doch ungebrochen kündigte er noch aus der U-Haft, am 24. Februar 2024, eine Großdemonstration in Berlin ab dem 3. August 2024 an. Sie soll darauf abzielen, ein starkes Zeichen für Frieden, Freiheit und eine innovative Gesellschaft zu setzen.
Mit der Rückgewinnung eines Teiles seines Vermögens setzt Michael Ballweg erneut seine Ressourcen für die Bewegung und für eine weitere große Demonstration ein. Er appelliert an Unternehmer, Bauern, Studenten, Beamte und Oppositionsparteien, sich friedlich der Demonstration anzuschließen und sich für ihre Grund- und Menschenrechte und eine zukunftsfähige Gesellschaft einzusetzen. Insbesondere ruft er die Studenten zur Teilnahme auf, um sich für die Freiheit von Wissenschaft und Forschung und ein freies Bildungswesen einzusetzen.
„Es waren immer die Außenseiter, die die Welt verändert haben“, ruft Michael Ballweg seinen Kritikern entgegen. Die bevorstehende Großdemonstration in Berlin solle diese These erneut bestätigen und zeigen, dass der Drang nach Freiheit und Veränderung mächtiger ist als jede Form von Unterdrückung. Berlin werde ab dem 3. August nicht nur Schauplatz einer Demonstration sein, sondern auch ein lebendiges Symbol der Hoffnung und des Neuanfangs.
Näheres mit organisatorischen Hinweisen:
II. Postkartenaktion gegen Kriegseskalation
Bergung von Leichen in Dresden – Dresden nach dem Bombenangriff, Bergung der Toten – Foto: © Deutsches Historisches Museum Berlin 1989/2337.1
Haben die verantwortungslosen Kriegshetzer noch eine Vorstellung, was Krieg bedeutet?
Die Bürgerinitiative „Gemeinwohl-Lobby“ ruft die Bevölkerung zu einer breiten Brief- und Postkarten-Aktion gegen die Kriegseskalation auf. Mit beängstigender Geschwindigkeit werde in Deutschland in Richtung Krieg hochskaliert. Doch um Kriege zu führen, benötige die Regierung die Unterstützung der Bevölkerung. Es sei daher sehr wichtig, dass die Bevölkerung der Regierung ihre Unterstützung für den Kriegsfall versage.
Mit der Aktion werde jedem auf einfache Art und Weise ermöglicht, seine Stimme gegen eine weitere Eskalation in der Ukraine zu erheben und als Bürger dieses Landes mitzuteilen:
ICH MACHE DA NICHT MIT! – und dieses deutliche Statement gegen Krieg ins Kanzleramt zu tragen. Damit könne er den Kanzler auffordern, sich umgehend für Friedensverhandlungen einzusetzen.
So heißt es in dem Aufruf:
Brief-/Postkartenaktion No War
„Alle Zeichen in Deutschland stehen auf Krieg. So lassen Regierungsvertreter verlautbaren, dass die deutsche Bevölkerung wieder „kriegstüchtig“ werden müsse.
In der Bundespressekonferenz zu Quadriga 2024 (NATO-Großübung Steadfast Defender) mit General Carsten Breuer, teilte dieser mit, dass Umfragen ergeben hätten,
dass 80-83% der Bevölkerung Zustimmung zu den Streitkräften in Deutschland geben würden, sowie Zustimmung zur Erhöhung des Verteidigungshaushaltes.
Quadriga 2024: Pressekonferenz mit General Carsten Breuer – YouTube
Alice Schwarzer berichtete folgendes in der EMMA:
„Im Auftrag des Innenministeriums erstellte Generalleutnant André Bodemann gemeinsam mit 150 Experten (…) in den vergangenen zwölf Monaten einen „Operationsplan Deutschland“. Dabei geht es um die „Zivilverteidigung“.
Denn, so der von der Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung (FAZ) befragte Generalleutnant: „Das kann die Bundeswehr allein nicht (stemmen), deswegen brauchen wir die Unterstützung der zivilen Seite.“
Operations-Plan Deutschland | EMMA
Wollen wir uns als Bevölkerung in einen Krieg, evtl. den 3. Weltkrieg hineinziehen lassen?
Gegen Krieg
Vollends den Verstand verloren hat nun auch die deutsche Regierung. Sie erlauben der Ukraine deutsche Waffen auf Ziele in Russland abzufeuern. Diese Eskalation wird im Falle der Tat sicher von russischer Seite nicht unbeantwortet bleiben.
Die Gemeinwohllobby ruft deshalb jeden Einzelnen auf, den Widerstand gegen Krieg in das Kanzleramt zu tragen. Dazu gibt es wieder eine Brief-und Postkarten-Aktion von uns, wir bitten diese zu unterstützen.
Lasst uns ein klares und lautes Zeichen für den FRIEDEN setzen. Und mitteilen, dass wir da nicht mitmachen werden.
Näher:
———————–
Anmerkung:
* https://fassadenkratzer.de/2024/07/02/nicht-wir-haben-den-krieg-begonnen-putin-uber-die-bundesregierung/#more-14842 und dortige Anmerkungs-Links
Der Friedensstifter 