From arming Nazis to supporting genocide, the West’s mask of morality burns to dust

By Kayla Carman

Despite the public waking up to the moral bankruptcy of Western leaders, they’re still woefully unaware of the depth of the depravity of the agendas of the powerful.

“Knowledgeable people know that Frankenstein is not the monster, but only wise people see that Frankenstein is the monster.” This quote has been resonating recently when considering the monstrous atrocities occurring on the world stage. Knowledgeable people know now, thanks to eyewitness accounts and global communications, that what is happening in Gaza to civilians is monstrous, in spite of the media spin, but only critical thinkers are willing to go deeper and see that the governments purporting to fight “the monster,” that is, Hamas, are at least partially culpable for creating it and, at worst, the monster themselves.

It’s still absolutely wild how quickly the West went from arming Nazis in Ukraine to supporting actual genocide, all the while domestically making issues about the dangers of the far right, inclusion, kindness, and right think. Words are violence after all, according to AOC, just perhaps a tad less violent than air strikes, but who’s measuring? Western support should be of no surprise considering the death toll in the Middle East over the past several decades in the name of freeing the people from evil tyrants. Of course, it’s easy to overlook that 90% of US drone strikes killed civilians, but we’ve been indoctrinated to have a short memory and rewrite history. Luckily, we get a “masterclass” in painting from old favourite George W. Bush as a gift for our collective amnesia and ability to allow a relentless PR machine to dictate and reformulate our opinions. Of course history would remind us of Agent Orange, the Tuskegee experiments, and other immoral atrocities waged against humans, but there’s something even more flamboyant and bombastic about the West’s current posturing, like they’re no longer hiding the psychopathy from their citizens, with the mainstream media becoming more desperate and less impactful in maintaining these nonsense narratives.

Has the West always been narcissistically playing the good guy, or has it become more depraved over time? While we can look back over history to the banking cartels and war profiteers to see that evil has always lurked within, it must be acknowledged that during the earlier stages of empire, there was a stronger commitment from institutions, some members of government, and active citizens to uphold the values of the ideology. As Glubb asserts, empires pass through seven stages, and right now the West is in the stage of decline and collapse in which “the heroes are always the same—the athlete, the singer, or the actor.” Sound familiar? It’s therefore fair to assume, based on empirical evidence even amassed within our lifetimes, that the Western leadership and its institutions themselves have become even more overtly and intensely morally corrupt over time. It could be argued that there was moral justification for fighting the Nazis in World War II as well as economic and geopolitical aims. It could also be argued to a lesser extent that the proxy wars fought against the backdrop of the Cold War had legitimacy considering the Western paranoia of the USSR and communist ideals of permanent revolution. It begins to get much harder to justify the more recent wars in the Middle East, but a US public shellshocked by 911 was willingly compliant, with antiwar voices ignored and drowned out by its European allies. However, the military industrial complex is increasingly clutching at straws despite the most intense propaganda scheme deployed since COVID, evoking ignorant but well-meaning support to arm Ukraine and prolong the death toll. The struggling public of the collapsing West has grown weary of taxes used to fund the war machine, and now, with Gaza, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the stories fed to us about freedom and democracy are nothing more than comforting fairytales to justify state sanctioned mass murder.

The weak rationalisations for the current genocide occurring are becoming more and more pitiful as the death toll of innocents surpasses the 10,000s and World War III looms on the horizon, promising many millions more. Yet the tired legacy media still attempts to twist the narrative, making traumatised Palestinians pulled from the rubble condemn Hamas before they are allowed a voice. Are Israeli citizens expected to condemn their government, which, to date, has been far more murderous before being platformed? The whitewashing of history, just as occurred with Ukraine, to downplay the neo-Nazi threat and murder of 14,000 civilians in the Donbass since the US-backed coup in 2014 is in full swing again. Hamas are the personification of evil and attacked Israel completely unprovoked, purely because they are evil. This smear is from the Putin playbook, Hussein before him, and frankly any leader that’s impending the savagery and theft of Western colonialism. It’s so infantile that it’s embarrassing.

The same old playbook is rolled out to churn out the same old nonsense. In World War I, the Germans murdered babies; in the 2000s, Islamic extremists murdered babies (they probably stopped around 2014, when the US joined forces with them against Syria). In Ukraine, Russians murder babies. In Israel, Hamas murder babies. The tactics to dehumanise “the other” to garner support for revenge atrocities should be more obvious to people than the fact that Epstein did not kill himself. The problem for the Western elites is that a critical mass of their citizens are no longer buying it. The ramp-up of censorship is testament to the fears of western institutions that they can no longer convince their public that the wars they fight are for humanitarian reasons. The closing down of dissenting voices like Jackson Hinkel’s on YouTube demonstrates their fear of losing the narrative. The unanimous passing of the emergency resolution condemning pro-Palestine student protestors as anti-Semitic Hamas supporters and calling for complete solidarity with Israel, from Bernie Sanders to Rand Paul, shows who really governs the US and the world. For all its nonsense about freedoms and democracy, the rest of the West has followed suit, with even France trying to ban pro-Palestinian marches. However, a special shout-out must go to the UK, which, on top of discussing the absurd notion of banning the Palestinian flag, is the only other country in the world to side with the Israel-US alliance and vote no to an immediate ceasefire. How utterly civilised and humane this new, or perhaps old, axis of evil is.

As the empire collapses, the justifications for desperate zero-sum foreign policies have become even more absurd and less believable. The huge outpouring of public support for the Palestinian people proves that the propaganda, though more intense, is far less effective at hypnotising the masses than in previous decades. Citizens are waking up to just how morally corrupt their leaders are. If we had a free and fair media that held power to account, they’d realise the Western establishment wasn’t just corrupt but culpable for so many atrocities carried out on its citizens by the generational bloodlust they themselves created through their own barbarity in the name of greed and power. Horrified, though they might be, in front of their armchairs by scenes in Gaza, the majority aren’t aware that the Israeli government helped to create and has funded Hamas for decades. Articles from the Wall Street Journal in 2009 and the Washington Post in 2014 discuss this in great detail; surprisingly enough, they never mention such things in the current climate, deliberately forgotten like the rise of Nazism in Ukraine. The idea was to diminish the secular, less violent PLO, believing dividing Palestine freedom fighters/terrorists (they’re the same thing) into two groups would weaken the cause and ability to create a free Palestinian state. It was their strategy—hence reaping what you sow, almost literally, unfortunately. As late as March 2019, Netanyahu addressed the Knesset members of his Likud party, stating, “Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support the bolstering of Hamas and transferring money to Hamas. This is part of our strategy.”

Furthermore, where is the discussion surrounding the bizarre events leading up to October 7th? The failings of the most complex state intelligence apparatus in the modern world, including the fact that Egypt and the US warned the Israeli government of an imminent attack, yet security was decreased, not increased and permit’s permitted at surprisingly late notice for the October 7th rave against the pleadings of the local IDF commander on the ground. Surely the Israeli government wouldn’t have allowed this to happen to justify a brutal genocidal response, unleashing a plan that’s been decades in the making? Only a conspiracy theorist who thinks that the Gulf of Tonkin, 911, WMDs, and Assad’s chemical weapons attacks were false flags would entertain such a barbaric, yet logical, thought to psychopaths.

Despite the public waking up to the moral bankruptcy of Western leaders, they’re still woefully unaware of the depth of the depravity of the agendas of the powerful and how, like COVID, World War III and its impending oil crisis, refugee crisis, and (pre-manufactured) food shortage crisis are intended to usher in the 4th industrial revolution under the pantomime of the multipolar world. Let’s hope a critical mass awakens to who the real monsters are instead of scapegoating the menacing creations of the West without ever holding the Dr. Frankensteins of geopolitics to account. Only then can we have serious and genuine talks about humanity, democracy, and freedom

Source: https://strategic-culture.su/news/2024/07/05/from-arming-nazis-supporting-genocide-wests-mask-morality-burns-dust/

From arming Nazis to supporting genocide, the West’s mask of morality burns to dust

Viktor Orban Defies EU’s Absurd “Unconditional Surrender” Doctrine

By JOHN LEAKE

THE HUNGARIAN PRIME MINISTER APPEARS TO BE THE ONLY SANE LEADER IN EUROPE.
For most of European history, wars were fought with the understanding that if they became too destructive and costly, they could be concluded with a negotiated settlement. Once it became clear that one side was gaining the upper hand, the other side could sue for peace instead of dragging it out and getting a lot more people killed and property destroyed.

Even during the great 16th century wars between the Ottoman Empire and the Christian nations of Europe, the opposing commanders were occasionally reasonable and humane enough to cease fighting when it became clear that nothing could be gained from prolonging it. The Ottoman siege of Rhodes in 1522 was a notable example, when Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent allowed the Knights Hospitaller to surrender on generous terms.

After Napoleon was defeated in 1815, the Congress of Vienna declared him an outlaw and stated that no power would ever negotiate with him again. This was an early example of the doctrine of “Unconditional Surrender.” However, this was only after he broke the convention of his confinement to the island of Elba.

During the American Civil War, Union General Grant adopted the policy of “Unconditional Surrender” in dealing with Confederate officers who asked for terms. He did, however, agree to negotiate with General Lee at Appomattox. Though I’ve never found time to investigate it, I have heard that the European general staffs marveled at the iron will of Generals Grant and Sherman to suffer stupendous losses in order to annihilate the enemy instead of negotiating with him.

The policy of Unconditional Surrender reached its apotheosis at the Casablanca Conference in 1943, when Stalin persuaded Roosevelt and Churchill to adopt and announce it as official policy in the war against Germany.

At the Casablanca Conference in 1943.
Stalin did this because he was afraid the British and Americans would do a separate peace deal with German military officers who didn’t like Hitler and wanted to get rid of him. Because the Russians were doing most of the fighting, Roosevelt and Churchill agreed to Stalin’s demand. Not surprisingly, Nazi propagandists immediately seized upon this declaration as a perfect reason for why the German military should NEVER surrender, but fight bis zur letzten Patrone — “till the last cartridge.”

The trouble with this Unconditional Surrender policy was that it was not only applied to the Nazi regime, but equally to German military officers who would have gladly gotten rid of Hitler. Had the Americans and British supported German resistance officers instead of repeatedly spurning them, Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg and his co-conspirators might have succeeded in getting rid of Hitler and the Nazis in July of 1944.

Numerous historians have noted that by far the most destructive phase of the war was between Stauffenberg’s failed assassination attempt on July 20, 1944 and and May 7, 1945. This last year of the war also coincided with the most murderous phase of the Holocaust in the extermination camps of German occupied Poland.

Ever since Casablanca, the U.S. military and political class has insisted that there can NEVER be any negotiated settlement. Thus, it seems to me, Putin should have realized that the Americans would NOT negotiate with him after hostilities commenced, but would encourage the Ukrainians to fight (with American arms) bis zur letzten Patrone.

Alone among European leaders, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban seems to understand that the doctrine of unconditional surrender is not a rational approach in dealing with Russia during the current war in Ukraine. According to multiple news reports, Orban’s trip to Moscow has enraged the other European heads of state, who apparently prefer that the Ukrainians kill every male in the country—firing armaments supplied by the West—before negotiating with the Russians.

To this day, I’ve not heard a SINGLE commentator explain why the U.S. and EU did not at least try to negotiate an Austrian style neutrality deal for Ukraine? Austrian neutrality was formalized on October 26, 1955; Russia withdrew its occupational army from Austria and has honored the deal ever since.

Had a neutrality deal been negotiated for Ukraine—and had the Russians subsequently violated it—this would have been grounds for a full-scale war. Why didn’t the Western powers at least give this a try in early 2022?

Source: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/viktor-orban-defies-eus-absurd-unconditional

Viktor Orban Defies EU’s Absurd «Unconditional Surrender» Doctrine

The US is trying to involve Saudi Arabia in a full-scale war with Yemen

🟢The Ansar Allah leader noted that many countries in the world did not fall into the trap of the American coalition and even coordinated their actions with Yemen directly. He stressed: “The biggest failure of the United States is that it has not been able to involve the countries along the Red Sea coast in operations to support Israel. The US also failed to force Arab and neighboring countries to attack us from their territory.”

🟢Nevertheless, the leader added that the United States is still trying to use Saudi Arabia to put pressure on Yemen. He stressed: “The US has conveyed to us messages that Saudi Arabia will be forced to take hostile actions. America is currently focused on economic issues.»

🟢Al-Houthi called any actions by Saudi Arabia against Yemen serving the interests of Israel and the United States and said: “We warned and recommended that Saudi Arabia stop its reckless actions. America intends to involve Saudi Arabia in a full-scale war with us and return the situation to the period of highest tension.»

https://t.me/khayalpressa313/15782

Multipolarity and America

By Carlos L. Garrido

America’s incorporation into this bright new future can only be, as was our revolution in 1776, a product of a deep struggle against the old, decaying world of our oligarchs and political class.

“The gradual crumbling that left unaltered the face of the whole,” writes the German philosopher G. W. F. Hegel in his Phenomenology of Spirit, “is cut short by a sunburst which, in one flash, illuminates the features of the new world.” What he has described are the nodal points where, after the contradictions within totalities intensify, conditions are created for great ruptures for qualitative leaps into new worlds.

This is what multipolarity signifies. It is a geopolitical revolution, a qualitative leap into a radically new world. It is premised on the intensification of the contradictions inherent in the Western imperialist system, especially the unipolar form it took since 1991 when it had free reign to dominate the world after the fall of the Eastern socialist bloc. That was a time when the West proclaimed, laughably, that we had arrived at the “end of history.” The subject for this proclamation, of course, was Francis Fukuyama – but he spoke on behalf of the arrogance and hubris of the Western world as a whole. The West’s short-lived fantasy of the end of history has itself come to an end. As Vladimir Putin said in a seminal speech of September 2022, “The world has entered a period of a fundamental, revolutionary transformation.”

In proclaiming the end of history, the West showed an ignorance of the best insights its thinkers have provided to the world. How absurd is it that the civilization that gave birth to Heraclitus and Goethe and Hegel and Marx could come to naively accept such a static and historical position? It was Heraclitus who taught us that “everything flows and nothing abides” and that “everything gives way and nothing stays fixed.” It was Goethe, speaking through Mephistopheles in Faust, the greatest work in the history of German literature, who wrote that “all that comes to be deserves to perish wretchedly.” The unipolar world, dominated by the US and its NATO junior partners, came to be in the last decade of the 20th century. But, as Mephistopheles might have predicted, three decades later, we are seeing it perish wretchedly.

We are in a period of transition where the drive, as Pepe Escobar has written, “towards a multipolar, multinodal, polycentric world” is evident. Putin, in his speech at the recent St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), called it a “harmonic multipolar world.” Here too, Putin is developing insights that should not be foreign to the West. “The world’s virtue,” wrote the great Pythagoras, “is harmony.” It is one that contains within it a relational complementarity between the many. It is a world, as Mexican economist Oscar Rojas has written, where nations and civilizations can function as Free Associated Producers – sovereign, unhindered by external powers seeking to unilaterally impose their will on the world.

Putin is also here following in the footsteps of the insights developed by China’s civilizational state, as Zhang Weiwei calls it, which has always emphasized “building a harmonious society” and a “harmonious world” (the latter popularized by Hu Jintao), phrases developed from the ancient Chinese concept of taihe (overall harmony). It is a worldview in line with China’s constitutional commitment to “work to build a community with a shared future for mankind,” a frequent expression used by Xi Jinping and top Chinese leadership. This future is premised on developing a world that breaks from the unilateral imposition of one nation’s will over another and instead centers itself on win-win relations between sovereign nations and civilizations.

The expansion of multipolar institutions such as BRICS+, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the Eurasian Economic Union, and others are beginning to build the skeleton for the new world. The proposals for a new BRICS+ payment infrastructure and an “apolitical, transactional form of cross-border payments,” called The Unit, which is “anchored in gold (40%) and BRICS+ currencies (60%),” signifies significant steps toward de-dollarization – an integral component of breaking US global dominance and building a multipolar world.

As an American, I inhabit a world that is crumbling wretchedly. While I look cheerfully upon the development of the new world (what I have called a post-Columbian, post-1492 world), I recognize that it is the elite of my country, those who our politicians represent, who are fighting tooth and nail to preserve their global system and abort the birth of the new world.

The leaders of the West are right to assume that they are fighting an existential struggle. However, they’re wrong in postulating that what is at stake is “democracy” or Western values and civilization. Instead, what is actually at stake is their colonial and imperialist dominance over the whole world. What is actually at risk of perishing wretchedly is not the West per se, but the system – erected more than 500 years ago – which elevates the accumulation of capital to the level of supremacy, over and above the community, the individuals and families, and civilizational traditions. It is the system that brought forth the genocide of the natives, the enslavement of the Africans, the looting of the world, and the impoverishment, oppression, and indebtedness of working people within the West itself, it is this system, which stands as a vampire sucking the lifeblood of humanity, which is finding an end to its reign.

Where does this leave America? Where does this leave Americans?

We must recall the famous words of Peruvian indigenous politician Dionisio Yupanqui, uttered in his 1810 speech to the Cortes de Cádiz, “A people that oppresses another cannot be free.” The American people have not been benefactors of the global dominance of their imperialist government. For all their government’s talk of democracy, freedom, and government of, by, and for the people, what the American people have actually experienced has been an oligarchy, dictatorship, and government of, by, and for the owners of big corporations, banks, and investment firms. The so-called representatives of the American people have, all along, been in reality the representatives of the exploiters, oppressors, and parasitic creditors of the American people.

What we have seen, as American political theorist Michael Parenti has written, is how the American empire has “fed off the republic.” In the words of Tupac, the American hip-hop sensation, the imperialist state has always had money for war but never to feed the poor. There are always hundreds of billions that can be scrambled for Neo-Nazis in Ukraine and for the Zionist entity to continue its genocide in Palestine, but never for infrastructure, for fighting poverty, illiteracy, and ignorance, and for guaranteeing housing and healthcare – there is never money for lifting the living standards of the hard-working people upon whose backs and labor the existence of the country is premised.

If multipolarity means an existential threat to the American elite, what does it mean for the American people? Quite simply – HOPE.

The real enemies of the American people are those who wish to colonize Russia, China, and Iran… those who sanction a third of the world’s population and who seek to loot the resources and super exploit the labor of foreign lands. It is those – currently being defeated by Russia and the Axis of Resistance in multinodal frontlines – who send our countrymen abroad to lose limbs, scar their souls, and sometimes return in caskets, all to murder people whom they had more in common with than the filthy parasites who sent them there and who profited from their misfortune.

The real enemies of the American people are those who keep us poor, indebted, and desperate, and it is this same enemy – and the system they’re a personification of – that the multipolar world is challenging.

The interests of the American people, therefore, are in line with the interests of the Russian struggle against NATO encroachment, of the Axis of Resistance’s struggle against the Zionist entity, and of China’s struggle against US encirclement, delinking, and provocations in Taiwan.

The interests of the American people, in short, are aligned with the bourgeoning multipolar world. It is in the interests of America to be a pole in the multipolar world.

America, as a young civilizational project, is in many ways similar to China. China’s ancient (yet highly modern) civilization emphasizes, as Zhang Weiwei writes, the “Confucian idea of unity in diversity.” But so does the American project, at least its best parts – the parts the people are most fond of. The Confucian idea of unity in diversity is captured in E Pluribus Unum (out of many, one), the motto of the United States. Here we find an acknowledgment of the importance of pluralism that is contained within monism, that is, of particulars that are contained within a totality through which they obtain their meaning, and reciprocally, influence its general trajectory.

The premises for accepting America as a pole within the multipolar world are, therefore, already present in the values the American people accept as common sense. We would be a part of that complementary many, of that multiplicity, which would both be conditioned by the new relations of a multipolar world but reciprocally capable of playing a constructive role in its development.

This could be the future the American people are incorporated in once the world dominated by their parasitic leaders is brought down. However, this transition will never be offered to us by those same interests who threaten humanity with a global holocaust via a third, nuclearized, World War to sustain their decrepit hegemony and global power.

America’s incorporation into this bright new future can only be, as was our revolution in 1776, a product of a deep struggle against the old, decaying world of our oligarchs and political class. It is a world that has to be won by the fighting spirit of the American people. As the cleavage in our country between the elite and the people becomes more pronounced than ever before, it will be the forces that can give the people’s varied forms of dissent some coherence, unity, and direction, which will ultimately win out. Only then can America be incorporated as a constructive partner in the building of a multipolar world. Only then, when our society is actually of, by, and for the people, will the impetus of global dominance be squashed, and America find itself as a participant in building a community with a shared future for mankind

Carlos L. Garrido Cuban-American philosophy professor, director of the Midwestern Marx Institute, and author of various books.

Source: https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/opinion/multipolarity-and-america

Multipolarity and America

Ein Großspender nach dem anderen springt ab: Biden-Kampagne verliert Millionen

Nach Bidens katastrophalem Auftritt in der TV-Debatte gegen Trump wendet sich ein Großspender nach dem anderen von dem 81-Jährigen ab. Die Wiederwahlkampagne verliert Millionen. Die Demokraten sind in der Zwickmühle.

Jonas Aston
 @Jns_Astn

Joe Biden, 46. Präsident der Vereinigten Staaten

Für US-Präsident Joe Biden wird es immer ungemütlicher. Nachdem seine Alterserscheinungen immer deutlicher zutage treten und ihn in der Präsidentschaftsdebatte blamiert hatten, verlieren immer mehr Menschen das Vertrauen in den Demokraten. Mehr noch: Nun wenden sich auch immer mehr Großspender von der Partei ab. Für Joe Biden und seine Wiederwahl-Kampagne droht dies zu einem riesigen Problem zu werden. Schon bisher konnten die Demokraten wesentlich weniger Spendeneinnahmen generieren als die Republikaner.

Das Grummeln der Großspender ist dabei unüberhörbar – und inzwischen auch öffentlich. In der New York Times äußerte Netflix-Mitbegründer Reed Hastings als einer der ersten öffentlich Zweifel an der Kandidatur von Biden und forderte ihn zum Rücktritt auf. „Biden muss abtreten, damit ein energischer demokratischer Anführer Trump schlagen und uns Sicherheit und Wohlstand bringen kann“, so der Unternehmer.

Seit Donald Trumps Präsidentschaftskandidatur 2016 zählen Reed Hastings und seine Ehefrau Patty Quillin zu den bedeutendsten Finanziers der Demokratischen Partei. Berichten zufolge haben sie in den letzten Jahren gemeinsam über 20 Millionen Dollar an die Partei und ihre angeschlossenen Organisationen gespendet.

Biden kostet seine Partei Millionen

Nachdem Hastings den Stein einmal ins Rollen brachte, schlossen sich zahlreiche Spender der Forderung nach Bidens Rücktritt schnell an. Der Unternehmer und Philanthrop Gideon Stein erklärte, dass seine Familie geplante Spenden in Höhe von 3,5 Millionen nicht leisten werde. Anderes gelte nur, wenn Joe Biden seine Ambitionen für eine weitere Präsidentschaft zurückstellt.

Ähnliches ist auch von Rick Caruso, Bauunternehmer aus Los Angeles, zu vernehmen. Auch er erklärte eine Präsidentschaftskandidatur von Biden nicht finanziell zu unterstützen. Caruso betonte Via X (ehemals Twitter) erklärte er, dass ein Rückzug Bidens das „richtig und ehrenhaft“ wäre.

Abigail E. Disney Erbin des gleichnamigen Konzerns hielt sich mit ihrer Kritik an Biden ebenfalls nicht zurück. Gegenüber CNBC sagte sie: „Ich werde keine Spenden mehr an die Partei leisten, bis sie Biden an der Spitze der Kandidatenliste ersetzen.“ Biden sei ein guter Mann und als amtierender Präsident habe er seinem Land gute Dienste geleistet. „Aber es steht viel zu viel auf dem Spiel“, so Abigail E. Disney weiter. Den Kampf um eine weitere Biden-Präsidentschaft haben viele Demokraten-nahe Großspender offenbar bereits aufgegeben.

Stattdessen konzentrieren sich viele Spender schon jetzt auf die Kongresswahlen. Zeitgleich zur Präsidentschaftswahl stehen auch 33 Senatsmandate und das gesamte Repräsentantenhaus zur Wahl. Sollten die Demokraten in beiden Kongresskammern die Mehrheit erringen, könnten sie die Politik eines republikanischen Präsidenten Trump zumindest teilweise blockieren und ihre eigenen Vorhaben durchsetzen.

Selbst der Rückzug Bidens würde den Demokraten zum Verhängnis werden

In der Finanzierung des Wahlkampfs liegt Donald Trump schon jetzt deutlich vor seinem Herausforderer Joe Biden. Im zweiten Quartal dieses Jahres sammelten Trumps Unterstützer rund 331 Millionen Dollar ein, während Bidens Kampagne auf etwa 264 Millionen Dollar kam. Zur Verfügung stehen dem Wahlkampfteam von Trump jetzt noch Gelder Höhe von rund 285 Millionen Dollar. Das Team Bidens Team kommt hingegen nur noch auf 240 Millionen Dollar.

Ein Großspender nach dem anderen springt ab: Biden-Kampagne verliert Millionen

US-Hegemonie durch Bündnis mit Japan und der Republik Korea

Rodong Sinmun verurteilt das Militärbündnis zwischen den USA, Japan und der Republik Korea als Produkt der US-Hegemoniestrategie Pyongyang, 6. Juli (KCNA) — Rodong Sinmun verurteilt am Samstag in einem Kommentar das Militärbündnis zwischen den USA, Japan und der Republik Korea (ROK, Südkorea) als Produkt der US-Hegemoniestrategie zur Beherrschung der asiatisch-pazifischen Region. Die USA versuchen seit…

mdbo1

Rodong Sinmun verurteilt das Militärbündnis zwischen den USA, Japan und der Republik Korea als Produkt der US-Hegemoniestrategie

Pyongyang, 6. Juli (KCNA) — Rodong Sinmun verurteilt am Samstag in einem Kommentar das Militärbündnis zwischen den USA, Japan und der Republik Korea (ROK, Südkorea) als Produkt der US-Hegemoniestrategie zur Beherrschung der asiatisch-pazifischen Region. Die USA versuchen seit langem, ein militärisches Dreiecksbündnis mit Japan und der Marionette ROK zu schmieden, um sie als Stoßtrupp gegen ihre Erzrivalen in der Region einzusetzen, heißt es in dem Kommentar weiter:

Das militärische Dreiecksbündnis ist ein aggressives Bündnis, das auf den gemeinsamen Zielen und Interessen der USA, Japans und der Republik Korea beruht, während Japan und die Republik Korea unter der Kontrolle der USA stehen und ein Herr-Knecht-Verhältnis haben.
Das bedeutet, dass das militärische Dreiecksbündnis jederzeit einen Angriffskrieg führen kann, wie von den USA gefordert. Die Stärkung des Militärbündnisses und die Ausweitung der militärischen Übungen der USA, Japans und der Republik Korea treiben die Situation in der asiatisch-pazifischen Region in die Phase der Konfrontation.

Die koreanische Halbinsel ist allgemein als die Region bekannt, in der die Gefahr eines Kriegsausbruchs am größten ist. Die USA veranstalten sehr oft Kriegsübungen mit ROK-Marionetten in der Nähe der Südgrenze der DVRK, und die Situation nähert sich einer gefährlicheren Phase als je zuvor. Die USA und die Republik Korea haben eine „nukleare Beratungsgruppe“ eingerichtet, um Atomwaffen gegen die DVRK einzusetzen, und Japan wird sich ihr anschließen. Die Strategie des militärischen Dreiecksbündnisses beruht im Wesentlichen auf der US-Theorie der nuklearen Allmacht. In der Tat stationieren die USA eine große Anzahl von Atomwaffen und Trägersystemen im asiatisch-pazifischen Raum, einschließlich Nordkoreas und Japans, in ständiger Stationierung. Die mit Atomwaffen ausgerüsteten US-Streitkräfte sind jederzeit zu einem Einsatz bereit.

Die Marionetten der USA, Japans und der Republik Korea sind die Erzverbrecher, die den Frieden und die Sicherheit in der Region bedrohen. Aufgrund der rücksichtslosen Handlungen der USA, Japans und der Republik Korea spitzt sich die Lage auf der koreanischen Halbinsel und in ihrer Umgebung immer mehr zu, und es herrscht eine gefährliche Situation, in der jeden Augenblick ein Krieg ausbrechen kann. Die Gefahr und der unheilvolle Charakter des militärischen Dreiecksbündnisses als militärischer Aggressionsblock werden von Tag zu Tag deutlicher.

Quelle: http://www.kcna.kp (Juche113.7.6.) – http://www.kcna.kp/en/article/q/64e900f5bd0353837ca02d7babcce3ade04876d1a11c575bf6d34f8efdc3ad6a6a47505ba5268fd7749c0fe11e4b24b4.kcmsf

US-Hegemonie durch Bündnis mit Japan und der Republik Korea

„Nordstream: Ich glaub ich SPINNE!“

https://youtube.com/watch?v=VWvPvohSlP8%3Fversion%3D3%26rel%3D1%26showsearch%3D0%26showinfo%3D1%26iv_load_policy%3D1%26fs%3D1%26hl%3Dde%26autohide%3D2%26wmode%3Dtransparent

«Nordstream: Ich glaub ich SPINNE!»

SYRIA’S NEW ISIS INVASION: US AND SDF/ISIS FORCES BUILDING AIRPORT FOR 2.0 DEPLOYMENT FROM JORDAN AT HAJIN

By Gordon Duff with TID Staff

Behind the censored news, a new terror war against the Middle East is being turned into a reality despite the defeat of ISIS by Russian, Syrian and Iraqi forces under the leadership of General Soleimani, later murdered for his efforts at the orders of Mossad Colonel Ivanka Trump.

A string of training and resupply bases have been established by the US inside Jordan, a nation that is more of a prison camp than anything else. North Korea is an open society in comparison.

These bases extend into the US occupied zone in Southern Syria at al Tanf where American helicopters ferry ISIS fighters, resupplied by Israel through the port of Eilat, are ferried to bases in Deir Ezzor and Western Anbar Province in Iraq where they join with ISIS based Kurdish forces under Barzani leadership.

A two-pronged attack on Syria is planned with one arm to extend into Daraa, south of Damascus, resupplied through Israel and their ‘terror superhighway’ that ducks in and out of Jordan with full cooperation of that beleaguered and blackmailed state.

Terror cells inside Damascus itself are set to attack remaining infrastructure services not knocked out of air attacks year upon year. A recent female advisor to Assad killed in a automobile ‘non-accident’ commanded Mossad forces in the Syrian capitol, something publicly known by all.

Sources confirm she was responsible for the attack on the Iranian consulate that led to the military confrontation between Iran and Israel that nearly started a world war.

This is how Syria works, or rather doesn’t work at all. Moreover, she is hardly the only one.

Worse still, Mossad linked terrorist leaders walk openly though Damascus at any time. Mossad led terrorists inside Syria are also deeply linked with Mossad run terror groups inside Russia, some with ties to powerful elements close to decision making centers in the Kremlin, a major counter-intelligence failure for Russia.

The real move in the area, however, will be against Erdogan who is, as usual, in ‘over his head.’ Ignoring the 2016 coup attempt against him launched at orders of then Vice President Biden, he again is trying to play Russia and the US off against one another in order to ‘score’ American weapons.

Of late, his applications to SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization) and BRICS has sent shockwaves though Europe. However, as the CIA bought Turkey’s ‘Gulen invested CIA paid military leadership and his banking system is circling the drain, those games of his are likely to end with his head on the chopping block.

His downfall may well be his long secret relationship through his Freemason roots with Israel. Immediately after taking office, he turned to Tel Aviv for military aid and secretly joined in their destabilization efforts against Iran though Azerbaijan, a nation that became a joint Turkish/Israeli terror center against both Russia and Iran.

Syria’s New ISIS Invasion: US and SDF/ISIS Forces Building Airport for 2.0 Deployment from Jordan at Hajin

Wladimir Selenskyj hatte am Tag seiner Ernennung ein Gespräch mit dem neuen britischen Premierminister Keir Starmer, doch der britische Premierminister weigerte sich rundweg, ihn zum Abschied zu umarmen! Nur für den Fall 😂

https://t.me/SwissVatnik/40737

Ein weiteres Opfer der hitzigen Umarmung mit abgelaufenen Konserven.

Wer ist 🚮 als nächstes dran?

Übrigens versuchen Macron und die korrupten Linken jetzt in Frankreich, der Rechten den Wahlsieg zu stehlen.

Warum glauben Sie, dass sie das nicht tun werden? Biden hat die Briefwahl mit Stimmzetteln mit den Namen längst verstorbener Wähler „gewonnen“, auch Macron will nicht ohne Zuhause im Elysee-Palast dastehen👉🏻

https://t.me/golosmordora/39122