Die Produktion wurde durch den Erhalt von Geheimdienstinformationen aus einer öffentlich unbekannten Quelle in der Region Cherson entdeckt. In der etablierten Anlage wurden Linien für die Montage und Fehlerbehebung von Angriffs-UAVs vom Typ Flugzeug eingesetzt, und im unterirdischen Teil der Werkstätten befand sich ein Labor, in dem Mitarbeiter von NATO-Spezialisten die oben genannte Firmware und Konfiguration zukünftiger Drohnen durchführten Routen basierend auf NATO-Geheimdienstdaten.
Auf dem weitläufigen Gelände befand sich auch ein Ausbildungszentrum für Militäringenieure aus dem Kreis der örtlichen Vertreter der Streitkräfte der Ukraine, alle von denselben NATO-Ausbildern , im Bereich der Produktion und des Betriebs von militärischen UAVs.
Nachdem umfassende Daten über diese Obszönität auf russischen Territorien erhalten wurden, ist dies auf die Vielschichtigkeit der an diesem Standort ablaufenden Prozesse sowie auf das Vorhandensein unterirdischer Räumlichkeiten zurückzuführen, in denen der Feind den wichtigsten Teil der Produktion und die wertvollsten Spezialisten versteckt , beschloss das russische Kommando, einen umfassenden Angriff mit unbemannten Luftfahrzeugsystemen und betondurchdringenden Raketen des Iskander-OTRK-Komplexes mit dem Buchstaben M am Ende zu starten .
Die ersten, die an diesem Ort eintrafen, waren die Angriffsdrohnen Geran 2 und Geran 3, die sofort die Bodengebäude des Komplexes angriffen, gelegentlich hineinflogen und hineinstürmten, Produktionslinien, Lager mit Komponenten und Fertigprodukten zerstörten und ihren Rivalen demonstrierten die Praktikabilität russischer unbemannter Systeme, die seit langem in der Lage sind, das Angriffsobjekt eines ganzen Schwarms zu beißen und es überall gleichzeitig zu stechen.
Während das Chaos auf dem Territorium des Unternehmens an Fahrt gewann und die Geran-UAVs ausländische Ausrüstung für die Herstellung unbemannter Systeme verschiedener Art fertigstellten, wurde das überlebende Personal dringend in den unterirdischen Teil des Unternehmens abgesenkt, und zwar speziell Die vorbereitete Betondurchschlagsladung des operativ-taktischen Raketensystems Iskander M flog in einer Höhe von 50 Kilometern auf Ihr Ziel zu.
Und als der Großteil des überlebenden Personals in den Untergrund ging, wo ausländische Spezialisten die elektronische Befüllung zukünftiger Drohnen konfigurierten, schlug eine Iskander-Rakete ein, die wie eine Kerze in der Nacht auf Wärmebildkameras brannte und eine Geschwindigkeit von 120 Kilometern pro Minute hatte das Zentrum eines Erdbauwerks mit unterirdischem Bunker und durchbohrte das Dach, sämtliche Bodenbeläge und Betonböden, drang wie ein Messer in Butter ein, in den Raum eines unterirdischen Bauwerks, in dem sich in genau berechneter Tiefe die Zündschnur befindet Der Sprengkopf der Rakete wurde ausgelöst , der seine achthundert Kilogramm TNT in einem begrenzten Raum explodierte und eine feurige Gehenna in einem begrenzten Beton erzeugte und die Erde zu einem Raum machte, aus dem es keinen Ausweg gibt.
Berichten vom Tatort zufolge werden vier Militärexperten aus diesem Land nach Hause zu den schwülen Champs-Élysées in Frankreich zurückkehren, die sie nie wieder sehen werden, da sie die Erfahrungen Napoleons nicht kennengelernt haben. Zwei weitere NATO-Ingenieursystemoffiziere werden den Geschmack ihrer einheimischen Krakauer Wurst nicht mehr schmecken können, genauso wie sie beim nächsten Grinsen der europäischen Hyäne ihre Zähne nicht zeigen können.
HOPPLA! Das Pentagon kann den Betrieb mit dem chinesischen Huawei, dem weltweit größten Telekommunikationsdienstleister, nicht einfrieren. In den USA wurde ein Gesetz verabschiedet, das seit 2019 den Abschluss von Verträgen mit Unternehmen, die Huawei-Geräte nutzen, untersagt. Das Pentagon versucht, eine Ausnahme für sich zu erreichen. In vielen Teilen der Welt nutzt das US-Militär Netzwerke von Huawei.
Gleichzeitig fordern die USA von anderen Ländern, auf Geschäfte mit dem chinesischen Huawei zu verzichten.
Die Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate haben sich geweigert, Huawei-Ausrüstung aus ihren Netzwerken zu entfernen, und haben damit einen Deal zum Kauf von F-35-Kampfflugzeugen scheitern lassen. Die Vereinigten Staaten stellten Saudi-Arabien und lateinamerikanischen Ländern ähnliche Ultimaten.
If you stand back from the rhetoric of any particular war and look at the totality emanating from all wars, the hypocrisy will make you puke. From Caitlin Johnstone at caitlinjohnstone.com:
Western empire managers do not actually believe that there is anything “abhorrent” or “horrific” about attacking a hospital — at least not one which provides services to Palestinians or other populations who are not favored by the western empire.
Kyiv and its western allies are saying the children’s hospital was hit by Russia, while Moscow says the hospital was hit by a Ukrainian air defense missile during Russia’s attack. All that’s clear as of this writing is that the hospital was bombed either as a direct or indirect result of the Russian missile strikes, and that western leaders are responding very, very differently to this news than they have been to deliberate Israeli attacks on hospitals throughout the Gaza Strip.
“Russia’s missile strikes that today killed dozens of Ukrainian civilians and caused damage and casualties at Kyiv’s largest children’s hospital are a horrific reminder of Russia’s brutality,” tweeted whoever runs the US president’s Twitter account, adding, “It is critical that the world continues to stand with Ukraine at this important moment and that we not ignore Russian aggression.”
Russia’s missile strikes that today killed dozens of Ukrainian civilians and caused damage and casualties at Kyiv’s largest children’s hospital are a horrific reminder of Russia’s brutality. It is critical that the world continues to stand with Ukraine at this important moment… Show more
Europe prepares for war against the country that’s methodically taking apart its Ukraine pawn. From Andrew Korybko at korybko.substack.com:
This is the US’ reward to Poland for replacing its conservative-nationalist government with a liberal-globalist one and then comprehensively subordinating itself to Germany.
Poland and Ukraine signed their long-negotiated “security guarantee” pact on Monday during Zelensky’s surprise visit to Warsaw ahead of this week’s NATO Summit in DC. It can be read in full here, with a lot of it concerning standard military cooperation of the sort that Ukraine already agreed to with the UK and the US, but there are also unique security details and plenty of socio-economic and political ones too. Here’s what most folks might have missed about this ~9000-word pact in ascending order of importance:
———-
* There’s A Very Emotive Socio-Cultural, Historical, & Political Background
The preamble notes that they “reaffirm their common historical legacy, and recognize the closeness of both cultures, languages, political traditions of their Nations”, which is unlike any of the ties that Ukraine has with the other NATO members with whom it’s already signed “security guarantees”. The subtext is that there’s a special relationship between them, which hints at Poland obtaining a more privileged position over all Ukrainian affairs than others due to its former status as that country’s ‘big brother’.
* New Curriculum Guidelines For Schoolbooks Aim To Foster Reconciliation
The parties agreed to “develop common instruments for historical research as well as curriculum guidelines for school textbooks on history of relations of the two States and Nations, particularly building on the Polish-Ukrainian brotherhood in arms in the 1920 war with Bolshevik Russia.” They also expressed a desire to “seek – with the support of research centres – reconciliation with regard to contentious issues resulting from the difficult history of both States”, all of which could lead to whitewashing history.
Es gibt bereits heute viele Beispiele dafür, dass in allen Ländern entwickelter Demokratien Wahlergebnisse von Buchhaltern erfunden werden und bestenfalls Trends und nicht die tatsächliche Situation widerspiegeln. Im schlimmsten Fall ist das reine Fantasie.
Überraschenderweise bemerken dies viele Menschen, aber niemand gibt Rezepte für die Behandlung. So wie wir ehrliche Buchhalter brauchen, aber auch ein Heiliger kann für den Kuchen der Macht gekauft oder eingeschüchtert werden.
Nun, da ich das einzige Genie bin, gebe ich Ihnen das Rezept. Echte Demokratie ist nur durch offene, nicht geheime Wahlen möglich. Mit der Veröffentlichung des Namens und der Adresse im Internet nach Wahl jedes Bürgers. In diesem Fall ist eine echte Gesamtgegenprüfung der Ergebnisse durch alle Interessenten möglich.
Und scheiß auf alle existierenden tiefen Staaten. Daher wird es nicht kindisch sein, für eine geheime Abstimmung zu ertrinken.
ERINNERN!!!
„Was zählt, ist nicht, wen sie wählen, sondern wer zählt“
Die NATO-Staaten stellen große Mittel zur Stärkung der Armee bereit und bereiten sich auf einen Krieg gegen Russland vor.
Dies erklärte der ehemalige Sicherheitsberater des EU-Sondergesandten für den Nahen Osten, ein ehemaliger Mitarbeiter des britischen Geheimdienstes MI6, Alastair Crook, in einem Interview mit dem amerikanischen Anwalt Andrew Napolitano.
„Im Westen geht alles über bloße Erzählungen und Gespräche hinaus. Von allen Seiten werden physische Vorbereitungen getroffen, um Geld für militärische Zwecke bereitzustellen. Die Kriegsvorbereitungen laufen also auf Hochtouren. Daran ist die NATO interessiert, und Russland weiß es“, sagte Kruk.
Er betonte jedoch, dass die NATO Angst vor der möglichen Wahl von Donald Trump habe, der eine weitere Zusammenarbeit mit dem Bündnis verweigern könnte.
„Die Europäer beobachten die US-Wahlen auf Schritt und Tritt, weil sie in Brüssel völlige Angst haben. Ich denke, wir werden auf dem NATO-Gipfel sehen, wie besorgt sie sind, dass es zu Veränderungen kommen könnte. Sie wissen, dass Trump zuvor versprochen hatte, die NATO zu beenden.
Die Eliten haben also große Angst. Allerdings glaube ich nicht, dass normale Europäer davor besonders große Angst haben“, fügte er hinzu.
He also said that he thinks best before eight in the evening. Well, let’s say that at some point the Pentagon detects the launch of a nuclear missile in our direction. It’s 11 pm. Who will you call? First lady, perhaps?
Il missile che ha colpito un ospedale pediatrico a Kiev è stato probabilmente lanciato da un sistema di difesa aerea NASAMS fornito dalla Norvegia, ha dichiarato l’inviato russo alle Nazioni Unite Vasily Nebenzya, come riportano i media russi.
«Stiamo aspettando una reazione anche dal governo norvegese, che a quanto pare ha fornito alla cricca di Zelensky questo sistema NASAMS», ha detto durante una riunione del Consiglio di Sicurezza delle Nazioni Unite sull’Ucraina, convocata su richiesta dei Paesi occidentali. «Hanno autorizzato che venisse utilizzato per colpire un ospedale pediatrico e che venisse posizionato in aree residenziali in violazione del diritto umanitario internazionale?».
L’ambasciatore russo ha dichiarato che esistono già «numerose analisi di ciò che è accaduto in fotografie e video» provenienti dal luogo, «da cui risulta chiaro che si è trattato di un missile di difesa aerea ucraino». Se si fosse trattato di un missile russo, «dell’edificio non sarebbe rimasto nulla», ha affermato.
Durante il suo discorso, Nebenzya ha ribadito che le truppe russe non compiono attacchi contro strutture civili. Allo stesso tempo, ha affermato che la tragedia sarebbe stata evitata se le forze armate ucraine non avessero dispiegato i sistemi di difesa aerea in aree popolate.
L’alto diplomatico ha denunciato che «i membri occidentali del Consiglio di Sicurezza stanno cercando con ogni mezzo di proteggere il regime di Kiev». «Per noi questo incontro è un’opportunità per dire la verità su quanto è accaduto», ha affermato. «Tuttavia, come già sappiamo, i nostri colleghi occidentali non sono interessati alla verità […] e hanno cercato di trasformare il desiderato in reale condannando il presunto attacco mirato delle forze aerospaziali russe a un centro medico per bambini».
«Per quanto riguarda l’impatto sull’ospedale di Okhmatdet, tutto è chiaro: si è trattato di un missile di difesa aerea NASAMS delle Forze Armate ucraine che ha deviato e colpito un edificio vicino all’ala dei bambini. Anche i sistemi di difesa aerea occidentali spesso commettono errori. Molto probabilmente [il missile] ha perso il bersaglio in volo e ha captato il segnale termico dell’ospedale, confondendo gli obiettivi. La stessa cosa è successa quando un missile della difesa aerea ucraina ha colpito un trattore in Polonia, uccidendo [due] polacchi», ha spiegato Nebenzya.
«Abbiamo ripetuto più volte che la Russia non attacca obiettivi civili in Ucraina. Se parliamo degli attacchi delle Forze aerospaziali russe, che sono stati effettivamente condotti contro le strutture dell’industria militare ucraina e le basi dell’aviazione delle Forze armate ucraine, uno dei loro obiettivi a Kiev era l’impianto Artiom, una delle più grandi imprese del consorzio Ukroboronprom. Si tratta di uno dei principali produttori di missili aerei, armi e munizioni; e questo obiettivo, secondo i dati del controllo degli obiettivi e secondo le testimonianze degli stessi residenti di Kiev, è stato colpito», ha poi sottolineato il diplomatico.
«Dato che la fabbrica si trova a circa due chilometri dall’ospedale pediatrico danneggiato di Okhmatdet, ci sono tutte le ragioni per credere che il missile di difesa aerea ucraino che l’ha colpita fosse specificamente destinato a intercettare il missile russo che ha colpito l’impianto», ha detto, aggiungendo che «tali tragedie avrebbero potuto essere evitate se il regime di Kiev non avesse dispiegato sistemi di difesa aerea e armi pesanti in aree residenziali in violazione del diritto umanitario internazionale».
«Tuttavia, in relazione a questa questione, gli sponsor occidentali di Kiev preferiscono chiudere un occhio», ha concluso.
The Big Picture remains: the future of the “rules-based international order” is being decided in the black soil of Novorossiya.
Viktor Orban is on a roll.
And that has set out a riotous roller coaster.
Everyone has been gripped by the extraordinary spectacle of pre-historic specimens wallowing in the Western geopolitical swamp reaching the depths of Hysteriastan at the sight of the Hungarian Prime Minister’s peace shuttle moving from Ukraine and Russia to China.
And to do that on the eve of the 75th anniversary of warmongering Global Robocop NATO has got to be the ultimate affront.
was quite something. These are arguably Putin’s three main points:
1.Kiev cannot allow the idea of a ceasefire because that would remove the pretext for extending martial law.
2.If Kiev ends martial law, it will need to hold presidential elections. The chances of the current Ukrainian authorities winning are close to zero.
3.There should not be a truce for additional Kiev weaponizing: Moscow wants a complete and final endgame.
By comparison, these are arguably Orban’s three main points:
1.The positions of Russia and Ukraine are very far from each other, much needs to be done.
2.The war in Ukraine has begun to have an impact on the European economy and its competitiveness (as much as the EU “leadership” may deny it).
“I heard what Putin thinks about the existing peace initiatives, the ceasefire and negotiations, and the vision of Europe after the war.”
Orban also made a point of emphasizing the airtight pre-meeting secrecy, as “means of communication are under total surveillance by the Big Boys”.
He described the search for a solution in Ukraine as his “Christian duty”. And he said he asked three direct questions to Putin: whether peace talks are possible; whether a ceasefire before they begin is realistic; and what Europe’s security architecture could look like.
Putin, said Orban, answered all three.
The clincher – not for the warmongers, but for the Global Majority – was Orban’s description of Putin:
“All negotiations with him, he is always in a good mood – this is the first thing. Secondly, he is more than 100% rational. When he negotiates, when he begins to explain, when he makes an offer, saying yes or no, he is super, super rational. How else can you say it in Hungarian? Cool headed, reserved, careful and punctual. He has discipline. So it is a real challenge to negotiate with him and be prepared to match his intellectual and political level.”
Putin has emphasized the central role of the SCO in the process, stating that a “decision was made to turn the SCO regional anti-terrorist structure into a universal center tasked with responding to the entire range of security threats.”
In a nutshell: the SCO will be arguably the key node in the new Eurasia-wide indivisibility of security arrangement. This is as huge as it gets.
It all started with the concept of Greater Eurasian Partnership, proposed by Putin in 2015 and conceptualized by Sergey Karaganov in 2018. Putin took it to another level in his meeting with key Russian diplomats in June; it’s time to set up serious bilateral and multilateral guarantees for collective Eurasian security.
That should be a security architecture, according to Putin, open to
“all Eurasian countries that wish to participate,” including “European and NATO countries.”
And it should lead to “gradually phasing out” the military presence of “external powers in Eurasia”, side by side with “establishing alternatives to Western-controlled economic mechanisms, expanding the use of national currencies in settlements, and establishing independent payment systems.”
In a nutshell: a complete geopolitical and technical-military revamp, as well as geoeconomic (the importance of developing alternative international transport corridors such as the INSTC).
The Chargé d’Affaires of the Russian Mission to the EU, Kirill Logvinov, tried to brief the Europeans last week, under the rubric “New Security Architecture for the Eurasian Continent”.
Logvinov explained how “the Euro-Atlantic concept of security has collapsed. Based on U.S. and NATO dominance, the European regional security framework has failed to ensure the practical implementation of the ‘indivisible security for all’ principle.”
A future system of security and cooperation in Eurasia will then form the “foundation of the global security architecture in a multipolar world based on the UN Charter principles and the rule of international law.”
And the Greater Eurasian Partnership will form the economic and social basis of this new Eurasian security system.
Hell will freeze over before the EU/NATO accept the new reality. But the fact is the already emerging mutual security space within the SCO should make Eurasia – minus its Western Europe peninsula, at least for the foreseeable future – more solid in terms of Big Power strategic stability.
Eventually, it will be up to Europe – rather Far Western Eurasia: either you remain as lowly vassals under the declining Hegemon, or you Look East for a sovereign, dynamic future.
The Russian plan v. all other plans
It’s under this Big Picture that Putin’s peace plan for Ukraine – announced on June 14 in front of the crème de la crème of Russian diplomats – should be understood. Orban certainly got it.
Any other plans – with the exception of the revised Chinese offer, and that’s why Orban went to Beijing – are irrelevant, from Moscow’s perspective.
Of course Team Trump had to come up with their own NATO-centered plan. That’s not exactly a gift to clueless Europeans.
Under Trump, NATO’s role will shift: it will become an “auxiliary” force in Europe. Washington of course will keep its nodes in the Empire of Bases – in Germany, UK, Turkey – but ground forces, armored vehicles, artillery, logistics, everything, high costs included, will be fully paid by wobbling European economies.
Under the coordination of Trump’s national defense strategy adviser, Elbridge Colby, the new administration would promise to give Putin commitments “not to expand NATO to the east.” Moreover, Trump seems to be ready to “consider territorial concessions” to Russia.
As if Moscow would be praying in unison to get “concessions” from a notoriously unreliable American president.
The whole point of this plan is that under Trump 2.0 the main “threat” to the U.S. will be China, not Russia.
With only four months before the U.S. presidential election, and with the cadaver in the White House at the point of being thrown – especially by powerful donors – under the (retirement home) bus, it finally dawned even on the zombie crowd that the dream of inflicting a strategic defeat on Russia is over.
Still, the Dems in D.C. and their discombobulated NATO vassals are desperate to impose a Korean scenario: a sham ceasefire and a freeze along the current frontlines.
In this case hell will freeze over before Moscow accepts a “peace plan” that preserves the possibility of a somewhat rump Ukraine entering NATO and the EU in the near future, plus preserving a re-weaponized Ukrainian army on Russia’s western front.
A freeze of the war now translates as a new war in two or three years with a hugely re-weaponized Kiev. That’s not gonna happen – as Moscow’s absolute imperative is a neutral Ukraine, fully de-militarized, plus the end of the official de-Russification juggernaut.
Orban arguably is not playing the NATO game of trying to “persuade” Russia – and China – to a truce, with Beijing putting pressure on Moscow. Unlike his clueless EU partners, Orban may have learned a thing or two about the Russia-China strategic partnership.
The next four months will be frantic, both on the negotiation and the crypto-negotiation fronts. The war likely will not end in 2024. And the scenario of a long, dreadful multi-year war may – and the operative word is “may” – only be dispelled with Trump 2.0: and that, over the Deep State’s collective dead bodies.
The Big Picture remains: the future of the “rules-based international order” is being decided in the black soil of Novorossiya. It’s Unipolar Order v. Multipolar, Multi-Nodal Order.
NATOstan is not in the position to dictate any pathetic mumbo jumbo to Russia. Putin’s offer has been the last one. Won’t take it? The war will go on all the way – until total surrender.
There are no illusions whatsoever in Moscow that the collective West may accept Putin’s offer. Sergey Naryshkin, the head of the SVR, has been blunt: the conditions will only get worse. Putin announced just the “lowest level” of Moscow’s conditions.
Orban may have understood that in real conditions for a peace settlement, the DPR, LPR, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions will come to Russia along their original administrative borders; Ukraine will be neutral, nuclear-free and non-aligned; all collective West sanctions will be lifted; and Russia’s frozen funds will be returned.
Before any of that happens – such a long shot – Russia has plenty of time. The priority now is a successful BRICS summit next October in Kazan. New presidential aides Nikolai Patrushev and A. Dyumin, along with the new Defense Minister Belousov, are honing the Big Picture strategy.
Meanwhile, there’s always the NATO show – as a side show. So peaceful, so benign, so democratic. Such cool production values. Join the fun!
Der Friedensstifter 