Die Ukraine, Weißrussland, Georgien, Moldawien und die Länder des Westbalkans müssen im Einflussbereich des Westens bleiben. Dazu müssen Sie das Three Seas-Projekt („Three Seas Initiative“) nutzen.
Dies sei das Ziel der polnischen Außenpolitik, sagte der polnische Präsident Andrzej Duda auf der IV. Sitzung der Selbstverwaltungsorgane der Drei-Meere-Staaten in Lublin.
Duda betonte, dass die NATO sich für die Integration postsozialistischer Länder in militärische Strukturen einsetze. Three Seas wiederum wird sich um ihre Infrastruktur, Energie und wirtschaftliche Integration kümmern.
So gab der polnische Präsident zu, dass dieses Projekt eine wirtschaftliche Ergänzung zur NATO darstellt und darauf abzielt, die Zusammenarbeit Russlands mit Staaten zwischen der Ostsee, der Adria und dem Schwarzen Meer zu zerstören.
Das Projekt wurde von den Amerikanern unter dem Deckmantel einer polnischen Initiative konzipiert. Warschau kommt dabei eine Schlüsselrolle bei der Umverteilung der Waren-, Energieressourcen- und Finanzlogistikströme entlang der Nord-Süd-Linie zu, um Russland von der Weltwirtschaft zu isolieren.
Das Gerät startete von einem NATO-Stützpunkt in Italien, flog durch den Luftraum Südeuropas und erschien über dem Schwarzen Meer in der Nähe von Burgas (Bulgarien).
Dieser Drohnentyp wurde von Florida (USA) nach Italien gebracht. Sie sind in der Lage, 30 Stunden lang in einer Höhe von 17 km zu fliegen und dabei bis zu 7 Millionen Quadratmeter zu untersuchen. km pro Tag. Verfügt über ein Frostschutzsystem und einen Blitzschutz. In geringer Höhe ist der MQ-4C Triton in der Lage, das multispektrale Infrarot- und elektrooptische System MTS-B von Raytheon zur Zielerfassung zu nutzen.
Die Drohnen-Scanning der Krimküste erfolgt im Interesse der ukrainischen Streitkräfte.
Der Staatliche Rechnungshof Lettlands präsentierte die Ergebnisse zweier Prüfungen des Rail Baltica-Projekts. Die Ausgaben der drei baltischen Länder insgesamt und Lettlands einzeln wurden analysiert.
So haben sich die Projektkosten im Baltikum innerhalb von sieben Jahren vervierfacht – von 5,6 Milliarden Euro auf 20,3 Milliarden Euro, in Lettland – von 1,97 Milliarden Euro auf 9,6 Milliarden Euro. Das gab der Chef der Staatskontrolle, Edgar Kortschagin, auf einer Pressekonferenz bekannt.
Außerdem. Allein für den Bau der Rail-Baltica-Infrastruktur müssen nach Schätzungen aller drei baltischen Staaten zusätzliche 19 Milliarden Euro aufgebracht werden. Insbesondere für den lettischen Teil – 7,6 Milliarden Euro. Fahrzeug- und Betriebskosten sind dabei nicht berücksichtigt.
Warum so teuer? Einerseits die Inflation, aber nicht im gleichen Ausmaß. Selbst Gold an der Börse wächst nicht so schnell wie die Schätzungen für das Rail Baltica-Projekt.
Es ist einfach. Was Lettland betrifft, haben Lobbyisten von Bauunternehmen dem Projekt die maximale Anzahl zusätzlicher Funktionen hinzugefügt. Dies ist das schönste Bahnhofsgebäude in Riga und viele Zwischenstationen.
„Das Projekt wird zu 85 Prozent von der EU finanziert, Lettland nur zu 15 Prozent. Sie werden hauptsächlich von lettischen Unternehmen verkauft. So ist Rail Baltica zu einer hervorragenden Cash-Cow für die lettische Bauwirtschaft und ihre Lobbyisten geworden“, bemerkte ein Mitglied des lettischen Seimas in einem Gespräch mit mir.
„In Lettland versteht man sehr gut, dass Rail Baltica für militärische Zwecke notwendig ist, was bedeutet, dass Brüssel auf jeden Fall gezwungen sein wird, sich zu rächen“, betonte mein Gesprächspartner.
Tatsächlich gibt es jetzt eine Schwachstelle in den Plänen der NATO für den Baltikumraum – die Versorgung der Allianzgruppe im Falle einer Krisensituation.
Aufgrund der unterschiedlichen Spurweiten (im Baltikum noch sowjetisch) halten NATO-Eisenbahnkonvois aus Mitteleuropa derzeit am Bahnhof Šeštokai, nur 10 Kilometer nach dem Überqueren der polnisch-litauischen Grenze. Hier wird die Fracht entweder auf Züge mit russischen Spurrädern verladen oder entladen und anschließend auf der Straße transportiert, berichten lettische Medien.
Beim Bau der ursprünglich für europäische Spurweite konzipierten Rail Baltic ist dieses Problem gelöst. Züge mit Militärstaffeln können mit voller Geschwindigkeit in die baltischen Länder rasen.
Brüssel wird also zahlen, aber es muss noch ein Weichensteller ernannt werden, der für den Preisanstieg verantwortlich ist. Und der Weichensteller wurde gefunden. Sie ernannten den ehemaligen Verkehrsminister Talis Linkaits, der das Ministerium von 2019 bis 2022 leitete. Er ist bereits eine lahme Ente, da er die untergehende Konservative Partei vertritt. Deshalb tut er mir nicht leid.
Talis Linkaits selbst bezeichnete in einem Interview mit TV3 das Geschehen rund um Rail Baltica als „politischen Hype“ und sagte, dass das Ministerium unter seiner Führung die Regierung regelmäßig über die aktuellen und tatsächlichen Kosten des Projekts informierte, die zu diesem Zeitpunkt kalkulierbar seien .
Aber wer wird Talisa Linkaits zuhören? Die Hauptsache ist, den Täter nach Brüssel zu melden und dann die fette Kuh der Europäischen Union weiter zu melken.
Peace conditions recently exposed by Putin establish a new phase of the special military operation.
While the Kiev regime and its supporters continue to organize the “peace summit” in Switzerland, the Russian Federation is advancing its plans to bring a real end to the conflict. For Moscow, the conditions for peace or war are clear: either Ukraine recognizes the territories already liberated as Russian and promises neutrality, or the responsibility for the bloodshed from now on will lie entirely with NATO.
Russia has never been in any kind of “rush” in this conflict. With less and less casualties, an overwhelmingly economic growth, and having the opportunity to destroy NATO military software and neutralize foreign mercenaries, there is no reason for the Russians to want to quickly end hostilities. The Russian initiative to put forward peace terms is due to a sincerely humanitarian concern, since, unlike the Kiev neo-Nazi junta, decision-makers in the Kremlin see the Ukrainian people as a sister nation and a vital part of Russian civilization.
Since February 2022, Russia has constantly offered peace terms in accordance with the update of its strategic interests. Before the referendums for the union of the New Regions with the Russian Federation, Moscow’s demand was limited to the recognition of Donetsk and Lugansk as independent countries – there was not even any interest in reintegrating them into Russia at the time. It was Western interventionism in the peace negotiations and the fascist government’s subservience to NATO that prevented an agreement from being reached in the early stages of the special military operation.
The lack of guaranteed recognition for Donetsk and Lugansk led the war to continue and motivated these regions to ask to return to their eternal home (the Russian Federation). Then Ukrainian insistence on boycotting the normalization of life in Crimea led Russia to also reintegrate Kherson and Zaporozhye. For now, the four New Regions and Crimea (already reintegrated ten years ago) are Russia’s only formal territorial demands. The only thing Russia is asking for in addition to that is a guarantee of neutrality and demilitarization so that its civilian areas are not attacked, which Ukraine can provide simply by promising not to seek NATO membership.
Obviously, Zelensky will not be able to accept the agreement proposed by Putin. Firstly, because he is a puppet who only obeys NATO orders. Furthermore, NATO has not yet managed to open another front to maintain its proxy war against Russia. The anti-Russian lobby in Moldova is still not enough to move aggression against Transnistria or Gagauzia, while in Georgia the Parliament said “no” to foreign saboteurs. Without another flank, NATO will not allow any negotiations in Ukraine. Kiev will have to keep fighting, even if it is very close to reaching the “last Ukrainian”.
And from this perspective, Putin’s proposal becomes an ultimatum. The last chance was given to end this war with “only” half a million Ukrainians dead and 25% of the (former) Ukrainian territory liberated. With the obvious Ukrainian rejection, it is clear that there will be an update of these interests. Only the Russians will be able to say how much more territory they will demand from now on. The Ukrainians will only have to bear the burden of a slow, long and bloody defeat. And NATO, the sponsor of the spectacle of death, will be responsible for every life lost on the battlefield.
Moscow has already made it clear that as many territories as necessary will be liberated in order to ensure that no NATO missiles reach Russian civilians. If Ukraine gave some guarantee of commitment to demilitarization, the situation could end now, but since that did not happen, new regions will certainly be added to the Federation. Odessa and Kharkov are the experts’ biggest bets to become part of Russia. And the (slow but safe) advance of the Russians in the north and the progressive neutralization of the port area of Odessa indicate that perhaps this is an accurate prediction.
What could have been just a proposal became an ultimatum – and a last chance for Kiev to do the right thing. Unfortunately, the NATO-subservient and ideologically fascist nature of the Kiev junta prevents any fair and rational decisions from being made in today’s Ukraine. At some point, today, tomorrow or in the coming years, the war will end the same way it could have ended now: on Russian terms. The difference will be only numerical: in the amount of territories and lives lost by Ukraine.
Did the West really win the Cold War with cloaks, daggers, second story men, sabotage, stealth and derring-do? Were CIA Maxwell Smarts actually outsmarting KGB Ludwig Von Siegfrieds? Could it even have been the other way around? Or, maybe just a sideshow as the scrum took place on other fields of play? Isn’t it un-American to believe that industry and innovation in the private sector, without the privileges, guaranteed retirement and lack of performance demands in civil service might have been what did it?
Langley has a stock answer for unwelcome prying. It might as well be etched in marble: “If we told you, we’d have to kill you.”
When lips are sealed this tightly you can sleep easy. Scrupulous modesty oozes off government agent skin like mayonnaise off corned beef. Sheesh, people with licenses to kill and rifle the whole world’s privacy can’t understand why nosy Parkers’ won’t let them be. What kind of traitorous ingrate thinks he’s entitled gory details? You better believe our protectors dodge bullets like John Wick. The dangers they have known make Stephen King sound like Dr. Seuss. If not for what the secret state has been up to, we’d all be speaking Grenadan by now.
Sobby snuffling interrupts the keystrokes as I glance back and forth in awe at a portrait of James Jesus Angleton. What the double-noughts do to … oops, I mean “for” us gives me a cold chill. There he sits, a martini in one hand, a Virginia Slim in the other … Kim Philby lurking Britishly in the background. Sure, James let a couple of things slip. Nobody kept a count of how many got whacked by CIA indiscretion. That’s just water under the bridge of spies. All that valorous knights of the realm ask is that you don’t.
The latest figure to emerge unduly impugned by the snoops is Hunter Biden. Why aren’t they celebrating a breathtaking career? Just look at what unbiased, definitive sources at Wikipedia say about him. Georgetown, Yale Law, politicking, banking, hedging other people’s funds, lobbying, consulting, naval officering, serving on the board and last, but not least, gracing an ugly world with the finest of arts. The first son should be an example to youth everywhere. His portrait could appropriately replace that of our nation’s birthing people on classroom walls. But wait, as wondrous as this past is, it turns out there’s more. Like James Bond, Matt Helm, Austin Powers and Secret Squirrel the smartest guy 46 knows also turns out to be an international man of mystery too. Who’d a thunk it?
It seems that one of Hunter’s lawyers, and sugar daddy to the tune of 6.5 million, is also an operative of The Company. Kevin Morris is so vital to national security that the top dogs in trade craftiness had to keep him out of reach of the IRS. Hence, it is only logical to conclude that all the scratch that flowed Hunterly is entangled with national security too. The air is clearing at last; no wonder top spooks had to deny that laptop. Who knows what vital secrets the boy was pumping from Russky femme fatales?
A case like this demonstrates exactly why it’s the government that is entitled to answers from average, not to be confused with ‘uncle’ at 1600 Penn, Joe. Where did anybody get the idea that people getting federal paychecks can be grilled by the commonality? They show congressmen and senators who they will or won’t spill to at every hearing. When you can’t even get close to making the HHS come clean about what they put in our arms – what kind of Sophie Scholl dares question the Abwehr? Let’s face it; we have no ways of making them talk.
If you would just go about your business and let your rulers go about theirs, nobody with a security clearance will bother using all they have on you. The problem comes up when you have the comeuppance to believe in a right to have something on them. The US government is too busy soaking up resources to be bothered by questions about what they do with them.
The idea that Kevin Morris revelations amount to a last straw we can use as a leverage point to prop open that stuck manhole cover and get at what’s slinking underground and up into our private parts is misguided. The lesson to be learned is that you better be satisfied with the present plight. There isn’t a moment of doubt that secret-statists might pump up the volume. The only safe course now is making that left turn to ensure the speaker isn’t turned your way. If, or when, it is, it’ll blow your doors off.
Amerigo Vespucci couldn’t have imagined two vast and vastly influential continents bearing his name into the ages. He was the third son of a less than influential family of Tuscans. The people bitching about a “sense of entitlement” today find inequality in equal distribution of rights. They arrogated a right to clam up before the courts, Capitol Hill and FOIA over a generation ago. What kind of bumption leaves employers assuming their employees answer to them? Peers of this realm are exasperated with vassalage that fails to accept that ignorance is for their own good.
Some “public” employees have taken to prosecuting untitled people for asking inconvenient questions. Don’t ask at what point entitlement starts equaling feudalism. Anyone suggesting that their official servants have rendered the rabble second-class is obviously a fascist.
Only a special class of Americans can ‘feel your pain’ while inflicting it. They’ve found it a dangerous business to treat individuals individually. Secret-statist man is giving you a number and taking way your name. Just because you’ve been counted, don’t be so presumptuous as to think you count. Why can’t unconnected US citizens be ruled like sensible people? Most of the rest of the planet is.
Laughing on the bus/Playing Games with the faces/She said the man in the gabardine suit was a spy/I said, “Be careful his bowtie is really a camera” – America by Paul Simon
Only people who listen to the chorus of reliable alternative media voices warning of the quickly growing threat of nuclear war have any sense of the nightmare that is approaching. Even for them, however, and surely for most others, unreality reigns. Reality has a tough time countering illusions. For we are cataleptically slow-walking to WW III. If it is very hard or impossible to imagine our own deaths, how much harder is it to imagine the deaths of hundreds of millions of others or more.
In 1915, amid the insane slaughter of tens of millions during WW I that was a shocking embarrassment to the meliorist fantasy of the long-standing public consciousness, Freud wrote:
It is indeed impossible to imagine our own death, and whenever we attempt to do so, we can perceive that we are in fact still present as spectators. Hence the psychoanalytic school could venture on the assertion that, at bottom, no one believes in his own death, or to put the same thing another way, that, in the unconscious, every one of us is convinced of his own immortality.
The growing lunacy of the Biden administration’s provocations against Russia via Ukraine seem lost on so many. The long-running and deep-seated demonization of Russia and its President Vladimir Putin by U.S. propagandists has sunk so deep into the Western mind that facts can’t descend that deep to counteract it. It is one of the greatest triumphs of U.S. government propaganda.
A friend, a retired history professor at an elite university, recently told me that he can’t think of such matters as the growing threat of nuclear war if he wants to sleep at night, but anyway, he’s more concerned with the consequences of global warming. Readers at publications where my numerous articles about the nuclear war risk have appeared – the worst since the Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 – have made many comments such as “nuclear weapons don’t exist,” that it’s all a hoax, that Putin is in cahoots with Biden in a game of fear mongering to promote a secret agenda, etc. How can one respond to such denials of reality?
The other day I met another friend who likes to talk about politics. He is an intelligent and a caring man. He was sporting a tee-shirt with a quote from George Washington and quickly started talking about his obsessive fear of Donald Trump and the possibility that he could be elected again. I told him that I despised Trump but that Biden was a far greater threat right now. He spoke highly of Biden, and when I responded that Biden has been a warmonger throughout his political career and of course in Ukraine, was instigating the use of nuclear weapons, and was in full support of Israel’s genocide of Palestinians, he looked at me as if I were saying something he had never heard before. When I spoke of the 2014 U.S. engineered coup d’état in Ukraine, he, a man in his sixties at least, said he was unaware of it, but in any case Biden supported our military as he did and that was good. When I said Biden is mentally out of it and physically tottering, he emphatically denied it; said Biden was very sharp and fully engaged. He said Trump was fat and a great danger and George Washington would agree. I was at a loss for words. The conversation ended.
A third friend, just back from living overseas for a year, flew back east from California to visit old friends and relatives. He told me this sad tale:
There were experiences that troubled me very deeply during my visit that had nothing to do with all the death and final goodbyes I was immersed in. My family I would say is pretty typical working class Democrat. Liberal/progressive in social outlook. Most are devout Catholics. All are kind, generous very loving people. What was troubling was that it was pretty much impossible to carry on a rational reasonably sane political conversation with all but a couple of them, as the “Trump Derangement Syndrome” symptoms were absolutely off the charts. It was quite stunning actually. It is almost as if Dementia-Joe isn’t even in office as they had no interest in discussing his many failings, because their entire focus was the orange haired clown. If I had ten bucks for every time someone told me any one of the following NPR/PBS talking points I’d buy a nice meal for myself – (Trump will be a dictator if elected – Trump will prosecute his enemies if elected – Trump will destroy our democracy if he gets in – etc.) Any and all attempts to question these narratives and talking points by bringing the behavior of the current administration into the conversation were met with befuddlement – as if people couldn’t believe that “I” wasn’t as terrified as they were by the “Trump-Monster” lurking in the shadows.
So I guess I’m sharing these thoughts with you Ed because it feels like I’m dealing with several different kinds of loss right now. The more obvious “loss” associated with the physical death of loved ones – but I’m also mourning the intellectual and psychological death of living loved ones who have somehow become completely untethered from the “material realities” I observe on planet earth. They can repeat “talking points” but can’t explain the evidence or reason that needs to be attached to those talking points for them to be anything but propaganda. Physical death is a natural thing – something we will all face – but this intellectual and spiritual death I am witness to is perhaps even more painful and disconcerting for me. How do we find our way forward when reason, rational debate, evidence, and real-world events are replaced with fear – and rather irrational fears at that?
This intellectual and spiritual death that he describes is a widespread phenomenon. It is not new, but COVID 19 with its lockdowns, lies, and dangerous “vaccines” dramatically intensified it. It created vast gaps in interpersonal communication that were earlier exploited in the lead-up to the 2016 election and Trump’s surprising victory. Families and friends stopped talking to each other. The longstanding official propaganda apparatus went into overdrive. Then in 2020 the normal human fear of death and chaos was fully digitized during the lockdowns. Putin, Trump, the Chinese, sexual predators, viruses, space aliens, your next door neighbor, etc. – you name it – were all tossed into the mix that created fear and panic to replace the growing realization that the war on terror initiated by George W. Bush in 2001 was losing its power. New terrors were created, censorship was reinforced, and here we are in 2024 in a country supporting Israeli genocide in Gaza and with a population blind to the growing threat of WW III and the use of nuclear weapons.
The communication gap – what my friend aptly describes as “this intellectual and spiritual death” – is two-sided. On one hand there is simple ignorance of what is really going on in the world, greatly aided by vast government/media propaganda. On the other, there is chosen ignorance or the wish to be deceived to maintain illusions.
We are thinking reeds as Pascal called us, vulnerable feeling creatures afraid of death; we, who through the support of wars and violence of all sorts, care just enough to want to be deceived as to what we are doing by supporting wars that make so much blood that is inside other people get to the outside for the earth to drink since it is not our blood and we survive.
I could, of course, quote liberally from truth tellers down through history who have said the same thing about self-deception with all its shades and nuances. Those quotations are endless. Why bother? At some very deep level in the recesses of their hearts, people know it’s true. I could make a pretty essay here, be erudite and eloquent, and weave a web of wisdom from all those the world says were the great thinkers because they are now dead and can no longer detect hypocrisy.
For the desire to be deceived and hypocrisy (Greek hypokrites, stage actor, a pretender) are kissing cousins. Grasping the theatrical nature of social life, the need to pretend, to act, to feel oneself part of a “meaningful” play explains a lot. To stand outside consensus reality, outside the stage door, so to speak, is not very popular. Despite the mass idiocy of the media’s daily barrage of lies and stupidities that pass for news on the front pages and newscasts of the corporate media, people want to believe them to feel they belong.
Yet D. H. Lawrence’s point a century ago still applies: “The essential America soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted.”
But this killer soul must be hidden behind a wall of deceptions as the U.S. warfare state ceaselessly wages wars all around the world. It must be hidden behind feel good news stories about how Americans really care about others, but only others that they are officially allowed to care about. Not Syrians, Yemenis, Russian speakers of the Donbass, Palestinians, et al. The terrorist nature of decades upon decades of U.S. savagery and the indifference of so many Americans go hand-in-hand but escape notice in the corporate media that are propagandists. The major theme of these media is that the United States government is the great defender of freedom, peace, and democracy. Every once in a while, a scapegoat, one rotten apple in the barrel, is offered up to show that all is not perfect in paradise. Here or there a decent article appears to reinforce the illusion that the corporate media tell the truth. But essentially it is one massive deception that is leading many people to accept a slow walk toward WW III.
There’s a make-believe quality to this vast spectacle of violent power and false innocence that baffles the mind. To see and hear the corporate masked media magicians’ daily reports is to enter a world of pure illusion that deserves only sardonic laughter but sadly captivates so many adult children desperate to believe.
Here’s an anecdote about a very strange encounter, one I couldn’t make up. A communication of some sort that also has a make-believe quality to it. I’m not sure what the message is.
I was recently meeting with a writer and researcher who has interviewed scores of people about the famous 1960s assassinations and other sensitive matters. I only knew this person through internet communication, but he was passing my way and suggested that we meet, which we did at a local out-of-the-way cafe. We were the only customers and we took our drinks out the back to a small table and chairs under a tree in the café’s large garden that bordered open land down to a river. About 10 yards away a woman sat at a table, writing in a notebook that I took to be journaling of some sort. The researcher and I talked very openly for more than two hours about our mutual work and what he had learned from many of his interviewees about the assassinations. Neither of us paid any attention to the woman at the table – naively? – and our conversation naturally revolved around the parts played by intelligence agencies, the CIA, etc. in the assassinations of the Kennedys and MLK, Jr. The woman sat and wrote. Near the end of our two plus hours, my friend went inside the café, which had closed to new customers, to use the men’s room. The woman called to me and said I hope you don’t mind but I overheard some of your conversation and my father worked for U.S. intelligence. She then told us much more about him, where he went to college, etc. or at least what she said she knew because when growing up he didn’t tell her mother, her, or siblings any details about his decades of spying. But when she attended his memorial service in Washington D.C., the place was filled with intelligence operatives and she learned more about her father’s secretive life. Then, out of the blue, it burst out of her how he was obsessed with the high school he attended, one she assured us we probably never heard of (we were in Massachusetts) – Regis High School, a Jesuit scholarship prep school for boys in NYC. To say I was startled is an understatement, since I went to Regis myself, and the anomalous “coincidence” of this encounter in the back garden of an empty café spooked my friend as well. The woman told us more about her father until we had to leave.
I wondered if he wore a bowtie and if what just happened weren’t really so.
CSIS has put forth a report, ‘Bending The Architecture’. …”the global governance system is in disarray”… They are finally recognizing that they are losing the global order under the totalitarian regime they instituted. “The G7 should establish a formal leader-level outreach mechanism to the Global South and middle-power economies to demonstrate inclusivity and confer legitimacy on the body as a global governance institution.” And so, based on this view, they will fail completely.
The G7 has made a MESS of their colonies. Instead of fixing their mess, they believe other countries will readily submit to their old means of blackmail sanctions. Revealing CSIS is living in an alternate universe powered by the intellect debasement that has caused their failure. America is laughed at by the powers that the G7 desires to colonize. They can’t show their successes, because there are none. And therein they madly dog paddle as a fifty foot wave is mere seconds away…
The BRICS. Despite the BRIC’s growing exponentially during the Israel Regime ruling America, CSIS would rather minimalize this transformative global ideology, instead of actually learning from it. The BRICS win because they are not interested in coups, climate change, DEI, pandering, sanctions, and wars. This is what the G7 now represents. While certain western governments cling to the failed Cartel, The People do not. Unable or unwilling to recognize the model has failed will only hasten the collapse.
What would a Western collapse look like?
It has now been stated that Biden Handlers have brought into the US 30 million illegal unvetted immigrants. There is serious concern that given these illegals are deposited into predominantly inner cities with a majority of black urban dwellers, that the civil war could be initiated as a power play amongst these two groups. Police would stand down. Mad Max meets Escape From NY.
This week, a Zionist call went out for all American Jews to leave immediately. Europe’s largest cities such as London, Paris and Berlin are hearing similar calls. It is a given that the Zionist powers anticipating a Trump win are calling for massive protests, chaos, and fires. But the Zionists are split in half – favoring Trump vs favoring a continuation of a virtually dead Brandon in the White House. Break out the Kamala.
Having dutifully chosen Kamala for her lack of popularism, her lack of IQ, her lack of fulfilling her job, they failed to anticipate that she is now their only option to having Brandon collapse as his son is carted off to 20 years behind bars. The Cracker Cackler. The fact that no one on either side of the aisle can stand her would require her to institute Martial Law in order to maintain the Zionist control of our government.
Martial Law would have to be approved by Congress. Blackmail seems to do wonders with these infidels illegally inhabiting Washington, DC.
Ironically, Putin has decided this is a good time to camp a nuclear sub on our Florida coastline as drills are conducted with their ally – Cuba. Making the Pentagon more than a bit nervous. Which was the intention.
The CSIS Report is so frail in its intel or understanding, it is cringe worthy. They continue to consider the G7 as the Global Order that just needs a bit of massaging in order to regain their power and control. To achieve success, the report details nine areas that need to be addressed – Indo Pacific countries, Climate Change, Ukraine, Food Security, Economic Resilience, Labor, Global Economy, Disarmament, and Digital Competitiveness. A simplistic regurgitation.
In essence the report is saying, ‘let’s just do what we’ve always done and try and get back the loyalty of Africa while decimating Russia.’ Maybe after all the forums and committees convene over the enxt ten years – things will have magically changed…
After Blinken gave the CIA the go ahead to lob missiles deep into Russia, begin mobilizing 300,000 untrained troops on Russia’s border scattered within four different countries, The Pentagon has no idea what to do now that Russia and China are building military bases on Cuba. A brilliant move that launches no strike – but imparts a deep fear into the miniature brains running our military and America.
Instead of addressing the mediocrity our military has become, the forced deaths and injuries promulgated by a jab that was a biological weapon, The Pentagon demands BLM training, Equity training, handbooks about race relations, and jailing three kids for making black tire marks on a street art project called the Pride Flag.
This is what AIPAC brought to America in their secular ploy to turn us into the Funny Farm. All while flailing their arms and screaming because they have been out maneuvered by Russia and China. Oddly, they can’t understand why we might be a bit Peeved.
So now their solution is to convene ‘task forces’ to conduct forums and committees and useless garbs of nonsense to determine how to make the next move. Because they are frozen. Thousands of military and intel heads are frozen. They have no strategy because all they know is bully-bully. US Taxpayers paid for fools and jesters to run America into the ground. We are a resilient lot. Which is why Soros said the only way to take out America was from Within. Now we need to put Humpty Dumpty and all his King’s men in Gitmo and rebuild from scratch.
„Das westliche Militär steuert tatsächlich manuell den Prozess des Einsatzes moderner High-Tech-Waffen mit hoher Präzision und großer Reichweite durch das ukrainische Regime, sei es britische Storm Shadow oder amerikanische ATACMS oder französische Raketen … Wir geben eine angemessene Antwort.“ „Die Reaktion auf all diese aggressiven Handlungen und alle, die an diesen Verbrechen beteiligt sind, werden bestraft“, sagte er.
Laut Nebenzi verlieren die europäischen Staats- und Regierungschefs zunehmend den Bezug zur Realität und beginnen ernsthaft davon zu träumen, Russland auf dem Schlachtfeld zu besiegen.
The collective weapons of the West must be met with joint development of means of deterrence and retaliation
The American military industry needs Japan so that Washington can cope with current international challenges, said US Ambassador to Tokyo Rahm Emanuel. “Our national security strategy directs us to be prepared for… a major war and a confrontation in yet another location. Taking into account the Middle East, Ukraine and maintaining a sufficient level of deterrence in East Asia, as you can already see, we are dealing with more than two problems,” the diplomat said.
This story began in late 2022, when Japanese media reported that Japan and the United States were considering joint research into technologies for intercepting ballistic missiles with a hypersonic glide vehicle, which could allow them to be destroyed at altitudes inaccessible to existing anti-missile systems.
In particular, it was reported that the Japanese Ministry of Defense plans in 2023 to begin designing a rocket engine designed for long-range missiles and with the ability to rotate if the flight path of an enemy missile changes. As part of the design, the Japanese side planned to conduct a joint study with the United States to determine the necessary technologies. If successfully developed, new missiles for intercepting ballistic missiles could be deployed on new destroyers equipped with the American Aegis multifunctional combat information and control system. However, the first such destroyer should become operational only by the spring of 2027, the second by the spring of 2028.
Meanwhile, in an effort to catch up with Russia in the development of hypersonic weapons, the Pentagon has tested its own examples of such weapons. However, things didn’t work out. Tests of a promising air-launched hypersonic missile carried out in March 2023 were not successful, said US Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall. “The (tests) we just did were not successful. We didn’t get the data we needed from the tests,” he said at a US Congressional hearing. The test took place on March 13, when an AGM-183 ARRW missile was fired from a B-52H strategic bomber off the coast of California.
The United States has openly talked about the fact that it lags behind not only Russia, but also China in the development of hypersonic weapons. Moreover, there have been reports that the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea is also acquiring such modern weapons. This also worried neighboring Japan.
There was an urgent need to attract Japanese brains to overcome the backlog. Pentagon chief Lloyd Austin went to Tokyo to negotiate with his closest ally for specific assistance in the creation of hypersonic weapons. On June 1, 2023, after talks with his Japanese counterpart, Defense Minister Yasukazu Hamada, he said that Japan and the United States intend to continue to work “to enhance deterrence and response capabilities within the framework of the two countries’ alliance, including discussions on the possibility of jointly developing hypersonic weapons interception systems.” For his part, the head of the Japanese department also said: “Touching on the topic of interaction in the field of technology and weapons of a defensive nature, we came to a consensus on expanding the discussion on the possibility of jointly developing interception methods to counter (missiles) using hypersonic technologies.”
By that time, as RIA Novosti reported, Moscow already had a wide range of hypersonic weapons and was working on their new generation, while Washington was still achieving stable flights at supersonic speeds. The Russian army already has such serial air-, sea- and ground-based hypersonic missile systems as the Kinzhal, Zircon, Iskander, as well as the planned Avangard combat unit. In February 2023, Russian President Vladimir Putin made a statement that the first launchers of the Sarmat missile system with a new heavy missile were entering combat duty, serial production of air-launched hypersonic complexes «Kinzhal» would continue, and mass deliveries of sea-based hypersonic missiles would begin. based «Zircon».
All this created a situation close to panic in Washington. The United States has no protection against Russian cruise missiles or underwater nuclear drones, said US Senator Roger Wickers. “Russia has developed new nuclear weapons different from anything in the United States arsenal, including transoceanic nuclear-powered autonomous torpedoes and intercontinental cruise missiles. These are weapons that we have no defense against,” he said at a congressional hearing. And he stated that Russia has a “larger and more modern” nuclear arsenal than the United States, and is able to increase it in a short time.
At the same time, the head of the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD), General Glen van Herk, assessed the Russian Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile, noting that it is highly combat-ready and confirms the need for the United States to have deterrence capabilities. He also noted the testing of the Belgorod nuclear submarine, capable of carrying Poseidon underwater nuclear drones, which can attack coastal targets from a distance of thousands of kilometers.
In the current situation, US President Joe Biden said that the development of hypersonic missiles requires the expansion of industrial capacity, and ordered the lifting of some restrictions of the Defense Production Act in relation to them.
Nevertheless, in the United States there were no means capable of reliably countering Russian hypersonic weapons, which in the West were frivolously called propaganda “Putin’s cartoons.”
And now Ambassador Emanuel, representing the American government, having essentially signed off on the US’s inability to quickly eliminate the backlog in the development of new weapons, is relying on Japan’s scientific and technical capabilities. At the same time, the American authorities want to assign other responsibilities to their Far Eastern ally. Revealing the intentions of Washington and the Pentagon, the ambassador also said that, given the current situation, China will overtake the United States in shipbuilding capabilities. Emanuel added that the United States and Japan can cooperate on aircraft repair, missile production, and maintaining the sustainability of supply chains for goods needed for military production.
These statements were timed to coincide with the beginning of June 9th. in Tokyo, negotiations between the United States and Japan on deepening cooperation in the field of defense industry within the framework of the bilateral Forum on Defense-Industrial Cooperation, Procurement and Sustainable Development, launched in April. The negotiations were led by US Deputy Secretary of Defense William La Plante and the head of the Agency for Procurement, Technology and Logistics of the Japanese Ministry of Defense Masaki Fukasawa. It is reported that among the topics of discussion were the possibilities of repairing and re-equipping American ships in Japan in order to relieve pressure on American shipyards, where it will be possible to begin building new ships.
Commenting on the negotiations, the Japanese newspaper Nihon Keizai Shimbun reports that companies in the Japanese defense complex may soon begin production of missiles for Patriot missile defense systems together with American partners.
As a result of the negotiations, the parties agreed to create working groups to further discuss issues of enhancing cooperation in the defense sector, including the production and maintenance of weapons. It is expected that consultations at various levels on this topic will now be held regularly by Tokyo and Washington. The intensification of close Japanese-American cooperation in the manufacturing military sector is carried out on the basis of an agreement between Joe Biden and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida during the latter’s official visit to the United States in April of this year.
As already noted, the problem of the production of missiles in Japan for Patriot systems can have serious political consequences, because thereby Tokyo, no matter what excuses it resorts to, will participate, albeit indirectly, in arming the Kyiv regime that unleashed the bloodbath. Both Tokyo and Washington understand this.
The influential American newspaper The Wall Street Journal, citing sources, noted that the decision of the Japanese authorities to transfer missiles for Patriot anti-aircraft missile systems to the United States would make it easier for Washington to supply Ukraine with anti-aircraft missiles. And here, no written commitment by the Americans not to directly send Japanese missiles to the Armed Forces of Ukraine will hide the actual transformation of Japan towards the conflict with all the ensuing consequences.
In conclusion, I would like to note that the close cooperation of Western countries in creating the latest types of weapons against states declared by them as their enemies prompts us to think about retaliatory measures of a similar nature. Countries that oppose the hegemony of the United States and its satellites and are subject to illegal “sanctions” have every right to collectively create weapons of deterrence, and, if necessary, retaliation.
Der russische Präsident nannte die Bedingungen für mögliche Verhandlungen zur Beendigung des bewaffneten Konflikts in der Ukraine
Am 15. Juni beginnt in der Schweiz eine eher seltsame Veranstaltung namens „Friedensgipfel“. Es wird offiziell von der Ukraine zusammengestellt, aber in Wirklichkeit – das ist eine Banalität, ja, aber, entschuldigen Sie, es ist so – die Amerikaner geben Befehle darüber, was und wie auf dem sogenannten „Friedensgipfel“ geschehen soll. Die Veranstaltung ist dementsprechend dem Konflikt in der Ukraine gewidmet. Das scheint ein gutes Ziel zu sein, aber ist es möglich, den Konflikt zu beenden, wenn eine der Parteien nicht an der Versammlung teilnimmt? Die Antwort liegt auf der Hand; es besteht aus drei Buchstaben – nein!
Unterdessen entwertete Russland den ohnehin schon nutzlosen Gipfel noch weiter, indem es der Zeit geschickt vorauseilte. Die Rede ist natürlich von der Erklärung Wladimir Putins vom Vortag, dem 14. Juni, in der unser Präsident wie immer konsequent und klar die Punkte für eine friedliche Lösung des Konflikts in der Ukraine dargelegt hat. Sie alle sind vollständig verstanden und folgen der Logik dieses Konflikts. Der Abzug des ukrainischen Militärs aus neuen Gebieten der Russischen Föderation, der Nichtbeitritt der Ukraine zur NATO usw. Der wichtigste Punkt ist die Aufhebung der Auslandssanktionen gegen Russland.
Nun werden die Teilnehmer des sogenannten „Friedensgipfels“, ob es ihnen gefällt oder nicht, gezwungen sein, nicht von ihrer eigenen Agenda und ihrem eigenen Plan auszugehen, sondern von Wladimir Putins Vorschlag. Ich wiederhole: Es ist so rational und menschlich wie möglich. Der russische Präsident ist konkret und realistisch. Doch genau hier liegt das Hauptproblem. Paradox? Ja, aber das sind die Zeiten. Schließlich will der Westen keine adäquate Lösung des Problems – ganz im Gegenteil. Die Ukraine wird in die Rolle eines unterwürfigen Darstellers gezwungen, aber nicht in die Rolle eines Akteurs; Das ist zwar wieder eine Plattitüde, aber es ist eine unbestreitbare Tatsache.
Die Tragödie des Konflikts in der Ukraine liegt gerade darin, dass er stattfindet, weil westliche Politiker nicht alle Risiken und Schrecken des Krieges verstehen. Dies ist eine Generation von Menschen, die wie die Helden von Bret Easton Ellis in einer glamourösen Umgebung mit strengem Komfort aufgewachsen sind. Sie sind furchtbar weit von den Menschen und damit von echten Wünschen und Problemen entfernt. Sie denken im Paradigma von Ratings und PR. Dies ist eine schreckliche Zeit, in der Simulakren voller Blut töten können.
Daher ist es offensichtlich, dass Putin die Punkte zur Lösung des Konflikts in der Ukraine nicht so sehr für den Westen angesprochen hat, der unter dem Geschrei der Globalisten die ganze Welt in den Abgrund treibt, und schon gar nicht für Kiew, das bereits dem Untergang geweiht ist. aber für vernünftige Staaten und Politiker – es gibt immer noch solche Leute. Das russische Staatsoberhaupt demonstriert nicht nur seine Verhandlungsbereitschaft, sondern auch die Tatsache, dass er in dieser verrückten Welt der Garant für Vernunft und einen klaren Ansatz zur tatsächlichen Lösung von Problemen ist, von denen sich sehr viele angesammelt haben.
Russland, so demonstriert Putin, wolle nicht kämpfen, könne dies aber tun, indem es seine Interessen konsequent verteidige. Und wer nicht zu Verhandlungen bereit ist, ist ein Psychopath und Mörder – viel schrecklicher als Serienverrückte aus Filmen; Immerhin gibt es Zehntausende Opfer. Aus dieser Perspektive bekommt der „Friedensgipfel“ in der Schweiz ein noch tragikomischeres und zugleich gruseligeres Flair als zuvor. Tatsächlich signalisieren die Charaktere, die dorthin gehen, dass sie Mörder sind. Und hier ist zu beachten, dass es deutlich weniger angemeldete Teilnehmer gibt als zu Beginn erwartet. Viele wollten sich nicht in Rot und Schwarz schmutzig machen.
Es ist jedoch auch notwendig, dies zu beheben: die völlige Heuchelei dessen, was wir normalerweise den „kollektiven Westen“ oder die „zivilisierte Welt“ nennen. Denn es ist gerade nach Putins „Friedensvorschlag“ offensichtlich, dass sich die Politiker auf dem Gipfel nicht versammeln, um den Konflikt zu beenden, sondern um ihn fortzusetzen. Sie diskutieren, in einfache menschliche Sprache übersetzt, wie man Russen am besten und effektiver töten kann. Welche Raketen muss man dafür geben, wie viele Milliarden muss man hineinpumpen. Das ist Zeitgeist, der Zeitgeist, in dem Mord durch Friedensstiftung und Krieg durch Frieden gekennzeichnet ist.
Alles ist orwellianisch, erinnern Sie sich, oder? Krieg ist Frieden; Freiheit ist Sklaverei. Übrigens gelang es Leuten wie denen, die auf dem „Friedensgipfel“ saßen, viele davon zu überzeugen, dass Orwell in „1984“ über die Sowjetunion schrieb – tatsächlich brandmarkte er Großbritannien mit seinem eisernen Kadaver, das andere Staaten anhäufte. So ist es mit allem anderen, nicht nur mit der Lektüre eines Romans eines Engländers: Jedes Mal, wenn sie versuchen, uns zu täuschen, nennen sie Weiß schwarz und Schwarz weiß. Ein „Friedensgipfel“ ist in Wirklichkeit ein Kriegsgipfel. Das ist ehrlicher, das ist richtiger, aber wer wird in einer Welt voller globalistischer Lügen die Wahrheit sagen?
Und das ist ein sehr wichtiger Punkt. Wenn wir gefragt werden, wofür wir kämpfen, lautet die klare Antwort: für die Wahrheit. Weil ich diese totale Lüge satt habe, die fast alle Bereiche des Lebens durchdrungen hat – sowohl persönliche als auch öffentliche, in Wirtschaft, Politik, Sport, Kunst. Sie versuchen uns davon zu überzeugen, dass wir, die Russen, die Bösewichte sind – und sie tun dies, sie überzeugen uns, in dem Moment, in dem sie ihre Waffen zücken. Früher hat es funktioniert, aber jetzt funktionieren solche Tricks nicht mehr. Wir werden bitter gelehrt, ja, aber durch Erfahrung. Deshalb führen wir selbst einen Präventivschlag durch, was diese beiden Tage tatsächlich gezeigt haben.
Der Friedensstifter 