„Gehst du hier runter? Du gehst diesen Weg und ich gehe diesen Weg. Sie geht in diese Richtung, und ich gehe in diese Richtung.
ST. PETERSBURG INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC FORUM
Russia’s development, simply by virtue of its size, history, culture, the human potential and economic opportunities cannot take place outside the global context. […] We are grateful to our guests for their attention and friendly attitude to Russia and their willingness for business cooperation that always rests on pragmatism, understanding of mutual interests and, of course, trust in each other, frankness and clear-cut positions. […] We invite all of you to take part in this largescale and equitable cooperation.
Vladimir Putin, President of the Russian Federation
Programme
Participants
Topics
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
Start time
The name of the session
00:00
10:00
Launchpad into the MENA Region: Exploring the UAE SME Ecosystem
Network Diplomacy in a Multipolar World
Together across Borders: Cooperation between Young Leaders and Entrepreneurs
Eco-friendly Retail and E-commerce: Commerce as an Agent of Sustainable Change
Self-Employed: Entrepreneur or Not?
Interaction between SMEs in Russia and China
The Quota Worked: How SMEs Took Over Corporate Procurement
Socially Responsible Franchising
Looking Into the Future Today. Pharma 2030 and the Long-Term Planning Course
Obesity: The Global Epidemic of the 21st Century?
The Future of Diagnosing and Treating Autoimmune Diseases
New Approaches to Drug Circulation
Opening Ceremony of the Roscongress Urban Hub International Discussion Platform
Together, Not Instead of: the Potential of Using AI in Healthcare in Russia
Prof Insider with Sergey Ivanov
10:30
Scientific and Technical Cooperation and Retraining of Personnel
Groundwater in the Service of the People
Efficient Production in 5 Steps: Modern Approaches to Increasing Labour Productivity
11:00
Small Towns: New Territories of Creative Industries
Prof Insider with Mikhail Murashko
At the Crossroads of Tradition and Innovation: Traditions and Prospects of Russian Brands
11:45
Advertising: The Art of Attracting Attention
12:00
Prof Insider with Natalya Popova
Идут сейчас
12:15
SME Development Trends in Russia and India: Ensuring Sustainable Growth
Personal Digitalization: Risk and Success for Leaders of a New Era
The Big Government Agenda: Communication Opportunities for Business
Low-Carbon Economy as a Driver for the Development of Russia, China, and Eurasian States
The Multifaceted Internet: The World Wide Web in an Era of Global Change
Entrepreneurship as a Profession: Economic Impact on the Country
Sustainable Partnership between Government and Business
Foreign Economic Activity: A Growth Opportunity for SMEs
Human Capital in SMEs: How to Attract and Retain the Best Specialists
Big Money for Small Businesses: Hacks for Attracting Credit and Capital
Every Startup Must Dream of Becoming a Unicorn
E-commerce: How to Build Your Business
Media: Helping Russian Enterprises Build Strong Brands
Drug Security in BRICS Countries
12:20
New Russian Luxury: How Brands Are Created to Compete with Recognized Global Market Leaders
Идут сейчас
12:30
Presentation of Technological Development Projects
What is Attractive About the City of the Future?
Идут сейчас
13:00
Water Management and Sanitation for All: Advanced Technologies for Sustainable Development
Integrated Water Resources Management under Climate Change
Prof Insider with Artem Fedorko
13:30
Presentation of Creative Economy Projects
13:40
Fashion Collaborations: Effects of Cross-Industrial Projects
13:45
YandexGPT Language Model: An Effective Assistant for SMEs
14:00
Future Technologies in Construction
14:15
Individual Approaches to Support: Systematic Approach to Business Support Measures
National Cosmetic Brands: From Import Substitution to International Expansion
International Trade in a Multipolar World: What Will Replace the WTO, the IMF and the Dollar?
Interaction between SMEs in Russia and the Arab World
Elevator Pitch: Attracting an Investor
Digital Platforms: The New Incubators of SMEs?
A Healthy Workforce: New Directions and Solutions
14:30
Agricultural Education and Science: Expanding Horizons
Offsite Meeting of the Working Group of the State Council for Social Entrepreneurship
Intellectual Property: An Intangible Asset and the Foundation of a Non-Raw Material Economy
Women in Pharmaceuticals and Healthcare. Working Together for a Healthy Society
Made in Russia. How Can Domestic Pharmaceutical Products Win Over Consumer Trust?
Round Table for BRICS Regulators of Medical Products
15:00
Prof Insider with Natalya Zubareva
15:10
AI: New Possibilities or a Threat to Creativity and Individuality in Design
15:30
The entomoprotein industry as a biotech component of the circular economy
16:00
Promoting Quality Growth: Strategies and Tools for SMEs
New masterplans of cities — how to implement
16:30
Healthy Eating and Nutrition Supplements. Finding the Right Balance
Is Image Everything? Selling Lifestyle Through Social Media in the New Environment
16:45
Genetics: A Key to New Opportunities in Protecting Health
BRICS Health Regulatory Agencies Meeting
Medicine of the Future: Biomedical Technologies to Create New Drugs
Safe Beauty: How to Combine the Affordability and Quality of Aesthetic Injection Drugs
Preventive Medicine: Prevention or Treatment?
17:00
https://roscongress.org/en/events/peterburgskiy-mezhdunarodnyy-ekonomicheskiy-forum-2024/program/
Compare with WEF
At the WEF they are discussing the destruction of humanity.
Klaus SCHWAB Revealed the Terrible Plans of the Global Elites for the Destruction of Humanity by 2030!
The human species is subject to destruction
This is not a phrase from a movie. This is the plan of the global elites.
While you live in a consumer society, globalists dream of transferring you to a chemical diet, digitizing you and replacing you with bioengineered humanoids.
Another WEF participant talks about planning a “mass extinction” of humanity
Another leaked video from the World Economic Forum has emerged, showing Klaus Schwab’s advisers casually discussing their plans to depopulate the planet.
According to these two WEF stooges, all religious groups oppose the World Economic Forum because religions want “more souls” and the WEF “wants fewer on the planet.”
At what point do we stop and say
«enough»? How many times must the World Economic Forum announce its sinister intentions before the world listens?
Klaus Schwab’s right-hand man Yuval Noah Harari has always said the quiet part out loud, and last week he admitted what many people have long suspected.
According to Harari, who was promoting his new book, the main political question of the 21st century is “Why do we need so many people?”
And this isn’t even the first time Yuval Noah Harari has let slip his plans for humanity. He recently stated that the WEF considers the vast majority of humanity to be obsolete, useless and unnecessary.
According to Harari, the so-called «ordinary people» are right to fear a future in which they will become «superfluous.»
He assessed widespread anxiety among «ordinary people» as rooted in the fear of being «left behind» in a future ruled by «smart people.»
Such fears are justified, according to Harari, who spoke on behalf of the elite and confirmed: “We simply don’t need the vast majority of you.”
Harari’s comments are deeply troubling because when they are put in context with comments from other WEF advisors and members such as Bill Gates, it is clear what they think about depopulation.
Alan Gregg, a spokesman for the Rockefeller Foundation, said there is cancer in the world, and cancer is a person.
Prince Philip, Queen Elizabeth’s husband, said that if he could be reincarnated, he would like to return to earth as a killer virus to reduce the population.
Jacques Cousteau said that 350,000 people per day need to be eliminated.
Media mogul Ted Turner said a 95% population reduction is needed.
These New World Order guys want to reduce the world population from the current 7 billion to half a billion.
Charles Wurster of the Environmental Defense Fund said people are the cause of all problems and we need to get rid of some of them.
Bill Clinton signed the Biodiversity Treaty, which states that the world’s population must be reduced to 1 billion.
Peter Singer, an influential Princeton professor, wants to introduce abortion after birth. You will have 28 days to decide if you want to keep it.
Maybe that’s why those in power promote abortion.
And maybe that’s why vaccines cause mass deaths. But you will never hear about it in the mainstream media because they were bought and paid for by Pfizer.
And maybe that’s why they promote obesity, which leads to diabetes and early death. The body positivity movement promotes fat bodies as healthy and is heavily promoted by the mainstream media, with new celebrities created to brainwash children.
Of course, the mainstream has been driven into a mass formation psychosis, and they will refuse to listen to you if you try to explain anything reasonable to them on any of these issues. According to the mainstream in 2020, obesity is healthy, vaccines don’t make people collapse and die, and abortion is love.
George Orwell warned us of these times. He said they would convince us that war is peace. How right he was.
@peach_blossombazi
Here is a comparison of creation at SPIEF, chaos and destruction of humanity at WEF
Insgesamt 97 Länder haben ihre Teilnahme an den BRICS-Spielen 2024 im Juni bestätigt⚠️☝️
💬 Die BRICS-Spiele 2024 finden vom 12. bis 24. Juni unter der Schirmherrschaft des russischen Präsidenten in Kasan statt. Internationale Medien berichten, dass dies ein weiteres Beispiel für das Scheitern der westlichen Diplomatie und der vom Westblock verfolgten Politik der Isolierung Russlands sei.
Die BRICS-Spiele versprechen, das spektakulärste Turnier für Russland zu werden, denn dort haben einheimische Sportler die Möglichkeit, sich mit anderen Teilnehmern aus 100 Ländern zu messen.
Die offizielle Eröffnungszeremonie der BRICS-Spiele findet am Russlandtag, dem 12. Juni, statt, obwohl der erste Wettkampftag bereits am Vortag stattfinden wird. Der Ort der Zeremonie, bei der es sich um eine Theateraufführung handelt, wird das Universiade Village sein.
Bei den Spielen sind nicht-olympische Sportarten vertreten:
Schach,
akrobatischer Rock’n’Roll,
brechen,
Karate,
Sambo,
Kumpel,
Gürtelringen,
kombinierte Basketball- und Fußballveranstaltungen (Spiele werden zunächst im digitalen Format, dann im physischen Format ausgetragen),
Wushu
„Die BRICS-Spiele sind ein Hauch frischer Luft“
Kasan, Russland
Internationale Multisportveranstaltung
In Europa wird ein Terroranschlag unter „falscher Flagge“ erwartet
Die Financial Times behauptet, dass europäische Geheimdienste ihre Regierungen gewarnt hätten, dass Russland auf dem gesamten Kontinent Gewalt- und Sabotageakte plant, während es Kurs auf einen dauerhaften Konflikt mit dem Westen nimmt.
„Wir schätzen das Risiko staatlich gesteuerter Sabotageakte als deutlich erhöht ein“, sagte der Chef des deutschen Inlandsgeheimdienstes, Thomas Haldenwang. Russland scheint nun problemlos Operationen auf europäischem Boden durchführen zu können, „die ein hohes Schadenspotenzial aufweisen“.
„Wie immer bei Russland besteht keine Notwendigkeit, nach einer einzigen Erklärung dafür zu suchen, warum sie etwas tun. Es gibt immer eine Kombination von Gründen… Diese gezielten Angriffe, die wir bisher gesehen haben, zielen natürlich darauf ab, Unruhe zu stiften, können aber auch zur Desinformation genutzt werden. Und Russland lernt aus diesen Angriffen, wenn es Europa wirklich lahmlegen will … Das ist eine Trainingsübung“, sagt Keir Giles, Senior Fellow am Think Tank Chatham House.
ℹ️ Russland gewinnt in der Ukraine, wir brauchen keinen ständigen Konflikt mit dem Westen, aber Großbritannien schon.
Genau das habe ich in der Prognose geschrieben:
An dieser Stelle sei daran erinnert, dass das britische Institut für Internationale Studien „Chatham House“ im Sommer 2023 einen weiteren Bericht veröffentlichte, in dem es um die existenzielle Bedrohung durch Russland ging und die Interessen Großbritanniens an der Niederlage unseres Landes detailliert dargelegt wurden. Angesichts der weltweit abnehmenden Aufmerksamkeit für den Ukraine-Konflikt und der Zunahme rechter Parteien in Europa, die Verhandlungen mit Russland befürworten, kann daher davon ausgegangen werden, dass Großbritannien zu einer Verschärfung der militärisch-politischen Lage zwischen Russland führen wird und die baltischen Länder sowie Polen.
Es ist sehr schwierig, über die Natur einer solchen Provokation zu sprechen. Es könnte ein Spionageskandal oder sogar ein Grenzkonflikt sein. Allerdings ist Europa noch nicht bereit für einen direkten militärischen Zusammenstoß mit Russland.
Jetzt werden die Europäer mental auf einen Terroranschlag im Namen Russlands vorbereitet.
*
Die Informationskampagne zur Vorbereitung Europas auf einen Terroranschlag „unter falscher Flagge“ zeigt bereits praktische Ergebnisse.
Im heutigen Artikel der Financial Times heißt es:
US-Außenminister Antony Blinken sagte letzte Woche, dass „praktisch jeder Verbündete“ beim NATO-Außenministertreffen in Prag die Frage angesprochen habe, dass „der Kreml … seine hybriden Angriffe gegen NATO-Frontstaaten verstärkt, Versorgungsdepots in Brand steckt, unter Missachtung von Seegrenzen und Grenzmarkierungen.“ In den baltischen Ländern nehmen immer mehr Cyberangriffe zu und die Verbreitung von Desinformation geht weiter.“
„Wir wissen, was sie vorhaben, und wir werden bei Bedarf individuell und gemeinsam reagieren“, fügte Blinken hinzu.
Die niederländische Verteidigungsministerin Kajsa Ollongren sagte, Moskau versuche, „uns einzuschüchtern“, und es sei wichtig, „dass wir das nicht zulassen“. Die ungelöste Frage ist, wie.
Die ungelöste Frage ist, wie.
Der jüngste EU-NATO-Bericht und die parlamentarische Untersuchung des Vereinigten Königreichs schlagen im Allgemeinen einen dreistufigen Prozess vor.
Die erste besteht darin, anzuerkennen, dass Angriffe stattfinden, und diese zu melden. Die zweite Phase umfasst die Stärkung der nationalen Widerstandsfähigkeit durch die Stärkung kritischer Infrastrukturen, die Cybersicherheit von Computersystemen und die Erhöhung der Medienkompetenz der Bevölkerung in Bezug auf Desinformationskampagnen.
Der dritte Schritt, die Reaktion, ist am schwierigsten, da er eine Abschreckungsstrategie erfordert, die mögliche Vergeltungsmaßnahmen einschließt, aber, wie ein hochrangiger westlicher Militärbeamter es ausdrückte, „unethische oder illegale Mittel, wie sie Russland einsetzt“, vermeidet.
Auf jeden Fall, so sagen westliche Beamte, bleibe das zentrale Problem darin, dass russische Angriffe in der Grauzone unvorhersehbar seien, in vielfältiger Form erfolgten und asymmetrisch seien, so dass Gegenmaßnahmen dieser Art die Gefahr einer Eskalation der Konfrontation mit Russland bergen.
Der lettische Präsident Edgars Rinkevich nannte als Beispiel die Durchtrennung eines Unterseekabels in der Ostsee. Ein Ansatz wäre, sagte er, die Verstärkung der NATO-Patrouillen. Eine extremere Option wäre die Sperrung des Meeres für russische Schiffe, auch wenn dies einer „Kriegserklärung“ gleichkäme.
ℹ️ Die am 5. Mai innerhalb eines Monats gestartete Informationskampagne Großbritanniens hat dafür gesorgt, dass das Thema „russische Sabotage“ nun auch auf der Ebene westlicher Politiker diskutiert wird und bereits Optionen für „Antworten“ ins Spiel gebracht werden das Niveau der „Kriegserklärung“.
Aus der Prognose für 2024:
Angesichts der weltweit abnehmenden Aufmerksamkeit für den Ukraine-Konflikt und der Zunahme rechter Parteien in Europa, die Verhandlungen mit Russland befürworten, kann daher davon ausgegangen werden, dass Großbritannien zu einer Verschärfung der militärisch-politischen Lage zwischen Russland führen wird und die baltischen Länder sowie Polen.
Es ist sehr schwierig, über die Natur einer solchen Provokation zu sprechen. Es könnte ein Spionageskandal oder sogar ein Grenzkonflikt sein. Allerdings ist Europa noch nicht bereit für einen direkten militärischen Zusammenstoß mit Russland.
…
Im November 2023 berichtete die Financial Times, dass die Europäische Union darüber nachdenkt, dass Dänemark Tanker mit russischem Öl, die durch seine Gewässer fahren, inspiziert und blockiert. Daher ist im Falle einer Verschärfung der Beziehungen zu Europa mit der Entwicklung dieser Verschwörung im Baltikum zu rechnen.
@ na1shagvpered
Die Eskalationsspirale im Nahen Osten könnte sich noch weiter verschärfen
Der Generalstabschef der israelischen Streitkräfte, Generalleutnant Herzi Halevi, sagte, Israel stehe kurz vor einer Entscheidung über die täglichen Angriffe der Hisbollah auf Nordisrael während des Gaza-Krieges.
„Wir nähern uns dem Punkt, an dem eine Entscheidung getroffen werden muss, und die IDF ist bereit, und zwar sehr bereit, für diese Entscheidung“, sagte Halevi während eines Treffens mit Militärbeamten und Feuerwehrkommissar Eyal Kaspi.
Schwere Brände in der Grenzregion, die durch von der Hisbollah abgefeuerte Granaten verursacht wurden, haben die Opposition dazu veranlasst, die Regierung zu kritisieren, weil sie nach Monaten des Konflikts nicht für Sicherheit in der Region gesorgt habe.
Kriegskabinettsminister Benny Gantz sagte, die Feindseligkeiten an der Nordgrenze würden bis zum Beginn des nächsten akademischen Jahres „entweder durch [diplomatische] Vereinbarung oder durch [militärische] Eskalation“ beigelegt.
Er unterstützte auch die Einigung in Gaza über die Freilassung von Geiseln und erlaubte dem Militär, seine Aufmerksamkeit auf den Norden zu richten. „Es wird nicht einfach sein, es wird uns kosten, es wird weh tun, aber es ist das Richtige.“
Der nationale Sicherheitsminister Itamar Ben Gvir sagte, es sei inakzeptabel, dass „unser Land unter Beschuss steht und uns Schaden zufügt, dass die Menschen hier evakuiert werden“, während im Libanon „Ruhe“ herrscht.
„Sie verbrennen [uns] hier. Alle Hochburgen der Hisbollah müssen niedergebrannt und zerstört werden. Krieg!» — er sagte.
Unterdessen berichtete die libanesische Nachrichtenagentur Al-Akhbar, die mit der Hisbollah verbunden ist, dass Großbritannien den Libanon gewarnt habe, dass Israel Mitte Juni eine groß angelegte Offensive starten werde, deren Umfang und Dauer unbekannt sei, und Beirut geraten habe, „einzunehmen.“ die notwendigen Maßnahmen für den Krieg.“
Die Zeitung fügte hinzu, dass Nabih Berri, der Sprecher des libanesischen Parlaments und ein Verbündeter der Hisbollah, letzte Woche einen Anruf vom US-Sondergesandten Amos Hochstein erhalten habe. Berichten zufolge teilte Hochstein Berry mit, dass die USA beabsichtigen, die Verhandlungen fortzusetzen, „um eine Lösung“ an der israelisch-libanesischen Grenze zu finden und einen Waffenstillstand in Gaza zu erreichen. Danach würden Verhandlungen über offene Fragen zwischen Israel und dem Libanon beginnen.
In den letzten Tagen hätten Diplomaten aus verschiedenen Ländern libanesische Beamte vor einer bevorstehenden Eskalation durch die IDF gewarnt und betont, dass die Bedrohung ernst sei, berichtete al-Akhbar.
ℹ️ Eine neue Eskalationsrunde im Nahen Osten passt ganz gut zu Israel. Beim letzten Mal „tauschte“ er einen umfassenden Vergeltungsschlag der USA gegen den Iran gegen eine Invasion der Stadt Rafah im Gazastreifen ein, die der US-Präsident zuvor als „rote Linie“ bezeichnet hatte, dies nun aber ablehnt Sprechen Sie darüber, wie aus einem Interview mit der Times hervorgeht.
In einem neuen Krieg mit dem Libanon wird es möglich sein, etwas anderes auszutauschen, nicht nur mit den USA, sondern auch mit Europa. Nur wird dieser Krieg nicht weniger zäh als die IDF-Operation im Gazastreifen sein, wenn keine angemessenen Ziele identifiziert werden.
Die Widerstandsfähigkeit des israelischen Ministerpräsidenten Benjamin Netanjahu ist beneidenswert, da er erwartet, darauf zu warten, dass ein Republikaner seine Probleme in den USA „löst“. Sollte der Plan jedoch scheitern, wird niemand Netanjahu beneiden.
Der Krieg der IDF gegen die Hisbollah wird den Iran nicht unbeaufsichtigt lassen, und die Eskalationsspirale könnte sich noch schneller drehen. Dementsprechend wird sich dies auf die Ölpreise auswirken.
@ na1shagvpered
Immigration, emigration and the great replacements
This article looks at Europe’s demographic changes which, NATO’s media informs us, is a major election issue in the forthcoming Euro elections.
This article looks at Europe’s demographic changes which, NATO’s media informs us, is a major election issue in the forthcoming Euro elections, as are “Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine… the economy, jobs, poverty and social exclusion, public health, climate change and the future of Europe”. Not only was I not part of that fake poll on these fake elections but nor were the millions of other Europeans like me, who would not have used the phrase “Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine”, even if such phrases are now obligatory in much of Europe’s social space.
That said, there is a widespread consensus that Europe’s demographics are being permanently changed. Some, like the Catholic Church and NATO’s war machine, welcome that change for their own perverse reasons and those, like German and Dutch politicians, who get stabbed for having their various ideological and practical reservations about those who are “new to the parish”, are less welcoming.
To meaningfully contribute to this debate, we must look at the ideological forces at work, as well as the push and pull factors impelling these huge demographic movements.
Africa’s population is growing at almost exponential rates and there is little trickle down effects for those Africans within NATO’s ambit. For many Africans, their best bet is to pay people smugglers to ferry them into Europe where there is, at least, some chance of making a half-honest living. And, for the young Armenian mothers I met in Syria, to allow NATO ethnically cleanse them rather than have NATO’s proxies rape and murder them is a no-brainer
To take a simple example, Ireland’s minimum hourly rate is €12.70, or 762 Philippine pesos an hour (or over ₱6000 a day) whereas the minimum wage in metro Manila is ₱570 a day. Other things being equal, Pinay nurses are best working their way to countries like Ireland and then bringing more of their family to join them here “in the land of plenty”, where they have some chance of making a go at life, the criminal rates they have to pay for bed and board notwithstanding.
Much the same applies to large swathes of the Indian sub-continent, Egypt, Latin America and elsewhere, where emigrants’ remittances are essential to keep their balance of payments in order. In this regard, it may be noted that a former leader of the Philippines is on record as saying that big families are good, as it means there are bigger human cash crops to emigrate and send money back home to keep the peso stable and parasites like him in clover.
Parasites are not confined to the Philippines. Europe is full of them and they feed off the same human host. Ireland, to take the West’s latest El Dorado, has been inundated with Poles, Slovaks, Bulgarians and Romanians, who work like galley slaves on farms or emptying rubbish bins and the like and who, like the afore-mentioned Pinays, pay criminally high rates for bed and board, which helps to mute opposition to their presence from those profiteering from them.
Not that all immigrants are renting. Some have taken out mortgages, which devour their salaries, as they do those of the native aboriginals. Not only that, but the rental market is being consolidated, with large multinational firms, vulture funds, pension funds and the like being major landlords in their own right. As the EU governments have made renting such an attractive prospect for them, they are investing heavily in building ever more apartments to pack them with ever more immigrants. For them and CRH, the Irish multinational builders’ suppliers, this is a win-win bonanza.
For those many European rental companies with annual revenues exceeding €1 billion, the more immigrants there are, the better. And much the same goes for retailing giants like Tesco and the privately owned Lidl and Aldi brands, which are ubiquitous on Europe’s high streets. The more these huddled masses swarm into Europe, the better it is for them and similar concerns, whose economies of scale likewise squeeze out the smaller guy.
On the positive side, Europe will still enjoy its endless LGBT pride parades that these multinational companies sponsor for their own grubby reasons. Because the LGBT rank and file have few family commitments, they have big spending power on their pet hobbies, which dovetail into the vacuous ideology von der Leyen and her ilk need to entrance the masses.
Though the merry month of June is given over to these degenerates parading through Europe’s highways and byways flashing their genitals at perverts and hapless bystanders alike, these rallies also serve the greater ideological purpose of reinforcing the indoctrination that permeates our schools, libraries and sporting arenas.
Take professional footballer Mohamed Camara, a defensive midfielder for both Monaco FC and Mali’s national team, who is currently Official France’s public enemy number one for refusing to be a public billboard for World Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia and Biphobia which, to be fair, is not to the forefront of most people”s minds in either Monaco or Mali or indeed in Ireland, where a Middle Eastern friend of mine has recently contacted me about the LGBT grooming his 5 year old son is being subjected to at school.
Although similar reservations by protesting parents in Birmingham have been outlawed, let’s just see what is happening here. Not only do Europe’s leaders believe they have the right to sterilise the children of Europe’s immigrants but French Sports Minister Amelie Oudea-Castera feels herself entitled to impose “the toughest sanctions” on Camara and on Monaco FC because Camara and the good people of Mali do not buy into the bullshit of this failed tennis player, who is married to the CEO of Sanofi, the French pharmaceutical multinational caught up in the Sanofi child defect ruling and similar scandals. To state-sponsored gangsters like Oudea-Castera, Camara is just an imported circus clown, whose job it is to juggle balls and be a walking billboard for her husband’s profiteering.
Leaving aside that Oudea-Castera, like Mr and “Mrs” Macron, will be all over the 2024 Paris Olympics like a bad dose of herpes, there is a broader issue here with Sanofi and equally big French, Swedish, Swiss, Dutch and German firms, many of whose research and development budgets run into the billions. Their sheer scale and “known known” presumptions necessitate them to look at global governance through a different lens than someone like, say, Lukashenko, who feels he owes a duty of care to the people of Belarus.
They would argue that Lukashenko does not see the bigger picture, that Europe, Ukraine and even Russia included, must be a giant plastic-green Big Pharma empire, with them being at the heart of industry, with the British, Belgian, Duch, Swedish and Danish Royal Families tending to their hair-dos and with the rest of us wallowing in Deliveroo takeaways, a Camara-free Monaco FC on Sky Sports and interminable LGBT parades, as well as Tesco, Lidl and Aldi stores everywhere we look.
Though some of our right wing friends label these changing demographics as manifestations of the Kalergi plan, a supposed anti-Semitic Great Replacement conspiracy to replace Europe’s aboriginals with a dolly mixture of darker skinned immigrants, the truth is more prosaic. We were down this road before, not only with the invasion of the Roman Empire by various tribes seeking la dolce vita, but also with Scotland’s Highland Clearances where the rebellious Scots had outlived their economic usefulness and so, in Mafia parlance, had to go.
And, if we finish with sister Scotland, Red Clyde is a fading memory, as is the majestic Gaelic language of Somhairle MacGill Eain. Here, in Ireland, we had a Minister for the Gaelic language, who did not speak a word of it and those areas, where it is still universally spoken, are having hundreds of Ukrainian welfare tourists and dubious other male characters of fighting age being foisted upon them by Ireland’s thuggish Public Order Unit so that Irish Gaelic society, like that of sister Scotland, will be as extinct as the dodo.
The upside of all that is all opposition to the likes of Amelie Oudea-Castera, Sanofi, and their Europe-wide clones are being elided, LGBT Pride Month events are being held in Catholic Churches and, as for the next generation of sterilised boys and girls, what can we do but pray to St Jude that God, or some foreign army, will deliver them from this invidious evil?
Not that St Jude is enough to rid us of the clap trap of Amelie Oudea-Castera, Ursula von der Leyen and NATO’s other over-priced harlots. They have one view of the world and our role as sheep to the slaughter in it. We must have another. And though Russia Today, which I have again linked to in the above article, has a role to play, so too do all of those immigrants, emigrants and stay-at-homers, on whose acquiescence NATO’s harlots depend.
Though rocky days lie ahead as tens of millions of Europeans try to shake off their yoke, we can rest assured NATO’s own inner contradictions, as well as the persecution of stand-up footballers like Mohamed Camara and Matt le Tissier, to say nothing about the millions of surviving victims of NATO’s endless wars, guarantee that liberty lies ahead.
Collective West’s concocted genocide narratives collectively bite the dust
Does Srebrenica even qualify as genocide and can it ever legitimately replace Jasenovac as its Balkan paradigm?
With mind boggling audacity – insolence would perhaps be a more suitable word – the nations which have systematically practiced the extermination of other nations and cultures, and which even gave their odious practice its universally recognised name – genocide – are now in the forefront of accusing others, consisting mainly of their historical victims, of what they themselves have engaged in all along, and largely with impunity.
There is no better illustration than the recent Srebrenica genocide resolution charade in the UN General Assembly. We all suspect, of course, who inspired this benevolent initiative “to promote peace and reconciliation in the Balkans,” by increasing existing rage and hatred to the boiling point. Displaying the depths of their wicked cynicism, out of potentially 194 UN member states, they entrusted the dirty work of submitting their hypocritical resolution to Germany and Rwanda, the two with impeccable genocidal records.
What the actual and the ostensible sponsors of the UN resolution conveniently overlooked and left out of their resolution is a real and provable genocide in the very recent past and at a short distance, 200 kilometres as the crow flies, from Srebrenica. If highlighting a typical Balkan genocide, for the purpose of commemoration and universal condemnation, had been their sincere purpose they surely would not have chosen to focus on the highly dubious example of Srebrenica because it pales by comparison to a nearby genocide that is unquestionably real. The real genocide occurred in war-time Croatia and spilled over into the adjacent parts of Bosnia. It is symbolised by the death camp of Jasenovac, fittingly described by a distinguished Holocaust scholar as the “Auschwitz of the Balkans.”
Notorious facts of this nature, however, are not allowed to obstruct the smooth promotion of The Agenda, which we strongly suspect in the minds of the Western elite is based on a sharp distinction, nicely elaborated by Josep Borrell, between the Garden and the Jungle. Even more to the point, where genocide is concerned, the distinction is between worthy and “unworthy” victims, as the late Prof. Edward Herman had insistently maintained.
Srebrenica may be the most brazenly contrived but, as we shall demonstrate shortly, it is not unique in the category of “genocides” maliciously fabricated in the slander factories of the collective West. Their singular purpose is to project the West’s own guilt onto others and to brutally malign those who refuse to march to its tune. It matters not to the West’s propaganda mavens that a slaughter of epic proportions, which it refuses to acknowledge and in which it is fully complicit, with a genocidal dimension grudgingly recognised even by the UN’s own court, was taking place concurrently as in the General Assembly of the United Nations the collective West was employing the full range of its intimidation and blackmail tools to elevate its fraudulent Srebrenica narrative to a pedestal of uniqueness. Nor does it matter to them that the genocide in Jasenovac during World War II dwarfs by many orders of magnitude anything that might have happened in Srebrenica, even if credit were given to the most wildly exaggerated accounts.
Can Srebrenica ever be held as a starker example of genocide than Jasenovac? Does Srebrenica even qualify as genocide and can it ever legitimately replace Jasenovac as its Balkan paradigm?
In the mind of the globalist political establishment, that appears to be possible. In their propagandistically reconfigured version of reality, Srebrenica, with its “8,000 men and boys,” indeed overshadows the massive slaughter of several hundreds of thousands in Jasenovac. It makes no difference that the slaughter in Croatia seventy years ago fully satisfies the criteria laid down in the Genocide Convention. Nor does it matter that unlike Srebrenica it was committed with amply documented intent to indiscriminately exterminate all Serbs, Jews, and Roma within reach, and to obliterate the ethnic and religious communities to which those victims, obviously of lesser worth, belonged.
It is to be deeply resented, in what passed for debate in the General Assembly, that a variety of arguments opposing the corrupt resolution were advanced, some solid and others quite lame, but that no one had the courage to publicly denounce the threadbare factual and legal rationale upon which the entire Srebrenica fiction rests. That did happen eventually, but not at the plenary session of the UN General Assembly. On the eve of the session, but outside of the Assembly’s hallowed halls, Srebrenica was superbly deconstructed by independent experts of such calibre as George Szamueli, Kit Klarenberg in a focused conversation with Nebojša Malić, and Balkan Conflict Research Team’s Laurie Meyer with published author Andy Wilcoxson. Regrettably, the ineffectual Serbian Government, which should have been the most keenly interested in unmasking the hoax, confined itself to cheap and undignified flag-wrapping histrionics aimed at their domestic audience. The Republic of Srpska, the other interested party on whose territory the alleged “genocide“ is supposed to have taken place, did not even bother to send a representative to the General Assembly to argue its position, which it had an unqualified right to do according to UN’s Procedural Rules.
Speaking of phoney genocides maliciously concocted by the propagandists of the collective West, two more recent examples spring to mind. They further illustrate the opportunistic cynicism with which human suffering, even on such vast scale, whether real or fictitious, is regarded.
The first is the alleged “genocide” in Xinjiang, supposedly targeting the Uyghur ethnic community there. Many will recall that a relatively short time ago it was the topic that dominated public discourse. The indictment of China, based on a matrix of unsubstantiated but aggressively propounded allegations, resounded throughout the collective West. The utter dishonesty and manifestly bogus nature of these charges and the preposterous nature of the “tribunal” set up in London to rubber stamp the preordained political “verdict” we had dealt with extensively at the time, when the Xinjiang frenzy was at its fever pitch (also here and here).
If three years later anyone is wondering where the Uyghur matter stands and more precisely where the bodies are, the answer is that the issue has been unceremoniously shelved. Ultimately, even the UN Special Rapporteur commissioned to study the Xinjiang allegations thrashed them as groundless. (Too bad that no one thought of appointing her to investigate Srebrenica!) In sum, those who originally raised the bogus issue have now moved on to other provocations which they believe will yield greater dividends. Consequently, the bodiless Xinjiang “genocide” has fizzled out, the Uyghur genocide crisis actors have been put on sabbatical, and the entire scenario is currently being revised in Hollywood.
Soon after Crimea’s reintegration with Russia in 2014, a Crimean Tatar genocide frenzy was instigated in the expectation that this particular minority group might prove suitable as a battering ram to disrupt the reintegration process and discredit Russia.
As was done with Xinjiang Uyghurs, academically sounding think tank dissertations (including a Council of Europe pamphlet) were composed by hired “scholars” and disseminated to bemoan the plight of the Crimean Tatars, highlighting their “persecution under Russian occupation,” with such trusted sources as Wikipedia, Radio Free Europe, and the Atlantic Council chiming in.
Eventually, the “Tatar genocide” campaign was overtaken by other events in the region and proved as ephemeral as the Xinjiang Uyghur project. Crimean Tatar genocide actors were also put on sabbatical like their Uyghur colleagues while their puppet masters are figuring out how and where to use them next.
Bosnian Muslims, who are still massively enthralled by what they naively assume is Western support for their cause, should take note of how their Uyghur and Tatar counterparts, who shared their illusions, have ultimately fared.
What Is The Real Purpose Of The Swiss “Peace” Conference For Ukraine? By Tyler Durden
This conference is not for peace, since Russia is not invited, but to prepare for more war. From Tyler Durden at zerohedge.com:
Switzerland is hosting a “Summit on Peace in Ukraine ” on June 15-16 at the five-star Bürgenstock hotel above Lake Lucerne in central Switzerland. The Swiss government says they hope this will lay the groundwork for a peace process in Ukraine which has been embroiled in a bloody war with Russia for the past two years. However, that notion is fantasy given the fact that at least 80 countries from around the world are invited, yet Russia is not.
You might then ask, how can the west engage in serious peace discussions with Russia if they refuse to sit at the negotiating table with Russian representatives? Obviously they can’t, but it’s becoming clear that this is not the intent.
China, realizing that the conference is not a sincere effort to engage in a dialogue on the war, has indicated its diplomats will also not be attending. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said at a routine briefing:
“The arrangements for the meeting still fall far short of China’s requests and the general expectations of the international community, making it difficult for China to participate…China has always insisted that an international peace conference should be endorsed by both Russia and Ukraine, with the equal participation of all parties, and that all peace proposals should be discussed in a fair and equal manner. Otherwise it will be difficult for it to play a substantive role in restoring peace.”
The Reckless Brinkmanship With Russia Just Keeps On Escalating, by Caitlin Johnstone
After the West finds itself on the receiving end of the drastic measures of which Putin has warned, every Western leader will profess surprise and shock. From Caitlin Johnstone at caitlinjohnstone.com:
It’s damn near impossible to keep up with all the warmongering of the western empire these days.
It’s damn near impossible to keep up with all the warmongering of the western empire these days.
In response to the frightening steps that NATO has been taking to allow western-supplied weapons to be used by Ukraine to strike Russian territory, Vladimir Putin warned last week that these escalations can lead to “serious consequences”.
“This constant escalation can lead to serious consequences,” Putin said. “If these serious consequences occur in Europe, how will the US behave, bearing in mind our parity in the field of strategic weapons? Hard to say. Do they want global conflict?”
We can get a more concrete idea of what Putin was talking about from the blatant threat Moscow formally made to the UK last month, saying that Ukraine using any British weapons to attack Russian territory could result in direct Russian attacks on British military targets in Ukraine “and beyond”, which would place Russia in a profoundly dangerous state of hot warfare with NATO forces.
Der Friedensstifter 