Russian medium-range missiles may appear near US East Asian satellites

Minister Lavrov warns that if Washington deploys missiles in the Asia-Pacific region, Moscow will respond with specific nuclear deterrence measures

This is not the first time that the Russian Foreign Ministry has made statements that if the United States deploys intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles (INF) in the Asia-Pacific region, Russia will take measures in the field of nuclear deterrence.

Let us recall that the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Nuclear Forces (INF Treaty) existed between the USSR and the USA since 1987. By such missiles they meant ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles with a range of 500–1000 km (shorter) and 1000–5500 km (medium). The treaty prescribed the elimination of these types of missiles and the cessation of production and testing of new INF missiles. In 2019, the United States withdrew from the treaty, and Moscow introduced a unilateral moratorium on the creation and deployment of these types of missiles.

Then President Putin proposed introducing a moratorium on the deployment of medium- and shorter-range missiles in Europe and other regions. He sent his initiative to a number of countries in Europe and Asia, as well as to various international organizations. As the Russian Ministry of Defense noted later, NATO actually ignored the proposal to introduce a moratorium on the deployment of new intermediate- and shorter-range missiles and the possibility of developing mutual measures to alleviate existing concerns.

Faced with Washington’s reluctance to reach an agreement on the INF Treaty, in October 2023, a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry announced that Russia was ready to take mirror measures if the United States deployed intermediate- and shorter-range missiles in Europe.

It was stated: “Russia’s unilateral moratorium on the deployment of ground-based INF missiles is directly linked to US actions in this area. The unequivocal formulations about the inevitability of our mirror countermeasures, used by the Russian leadership when declaring the mentioned moratorium, leave no room for other interpretations . ” This also applies to the plans of Washington and the Pentagon to deploy such missiles on the territory of their military allies in the Asia-Pacific region, primarily in Japan and South Korea.

In April of this year, the commander of US ground forces in the Pacific region, Charles Flynn, made a statement about the US intention to deploy medium-range missiles in the Indo-Pacific region in the near future. As the Russian Foreign Ministry reported in early May, Moscow, in response to Washington’s actions, is intensifying development and starting production of medium- and shorter-range missile systems, and also again warns the United States that if such American systems appear in any region of the world, Russia will lift its unilateral moratorium for their placement.

However, diplomatic exhortations and warnings do not seem to make an impression on the American “partners”, who only consider actions backed by real force. 

The “test step” was launched by the Americans during joint military exercises held in April of this year with the armed forces of the Philippines, which US President Biden is actively dragging into the military blocs he has put together in the Asia-Pacific region, directed against China and Russia. Then, for the first time, the United States deployed ground-based missile systems in the region, previously prohibited under the treaty with Russia: army Typhon systems were transferred to the Philippines as part of the exercises. This is the Army’s new ground-based launcher capable of launching Tomahawk cruise missiles and Standard SM-6 multi-role missiles. These are precisely the systems that the Americans reportedly planned to deploy in Asia-Pacific countries.

It took an unequivocal statement from the Russian government, which was recently made by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. It was stated that Russia, in addition to abandoning its unilateral moratorium on the deployment of intermediate- and shorter-range missiles, could take steps in the field of nuclear deterrence if the United States deploys its missiles in Europe or the Asia-Pacific region.

“The implementation by the Americans of plans to deploy ground-based medium- and shorter-range missiles will not remain without our reaction. In particular, in this case, a rejection of the unilateral self-restrictions introduced by Russia after the US withdrawal from the INF Treaty is inevitable. We do not exclude additional steps in the field of nuclear deterrence, because forward-based American missiles will be able to cover command posts and locations of our nuclear forces,” Lavrov said.

According to the minister, the deployment of American ground-based medium- and shorter-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region “will create a serious security challenge for Russia.” But such actions will become a problem not only for Moscow. “The joint statement following the recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to the PRC noted that such destabilizing steps by the United States pose a direct threat to both our country and China. Therefore, we and our Chinese partners agreed to increase cooperation in order to repel Washington’s irresponsible behavior that undermines international stability,” Lavrov emphasized.

“Initially, the Americans withdrew from the INF Treaty in order to develop new spaces, including the Philippines, and I am sure that other countries in the Asia-Pacific region will receive requests to provide hospitable territory for similar types of weapons,” admitted the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry.

We will not argue that it was the decisive tone of the Russian minister’s warnings that forced the Americans to abandon their plans to encircle Russia and China with their medium-range missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads stationed on their satellite territories. However, according to TASS, the Americans hastened to announce that at this stage they will refrain from returning nuclear weapons to the Asia-Pacific region.

Deputy head of the US State Department press service Vedant Patel commented on Russia’s statements about the possible deployment of medium- and shorter-range missiles by the United States in the Asia-Pacific region, noting that Washington does not see the need for this. “The United States does not currently consider it necessary to return nuclear weapons to the Indo-Pacific region. And the United States has no plans to provide forward deployment of nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula,” said a US foreign policy official.

But these are just words, and with the caveat that the Americans will not install their deadly missiles in East Asian satellite countries “at this time.” In reality, such plans remain and, importantly, the current government, for example, of Japan, will not oppose their implementation. Moreover, hawks from this government allow American nuclear weapons to be “invited” onto Japanese soil. 

https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2024/06/02/rossiyskie-rakety-sredney-dalnosti-mogut-poyavitsya-pod-bokom-vostochnoaziatskikh

“Escalada demencial”: Kennedy Jr. condena el permiso de Biden para que Ucrania ataque Rusia

El abogado ambientalista y político estadounidense Robert Francis Kennedy Jr., uno de los candidatos demócratas a las presidenciales de 2024, condenó la supuesta autorización del mandatario de Estados Unidos, Joe Biden, para que Kiev utilice armas estadounidenses con el fin de atacar territorio ruso desde la provincia de Járkov.

“Otra escalada demencial por parte de la Administración de Biden es autorizar a Ucrania a atacar objetivos en la profundidad de Rusia. Usando nuestras armas”, escribió Kennedy Jr. en su cuenta de la red social X.

Un portavoz del Departamento de Estado de EEUU declaró antes a Sputnik que Biden había autorizado a Ucrania a utilizar armamento estadounidense para la lucha contrabatería contra objetivos en territorio ruso que amenazan la zona de Járkov, pero dejó en vigor la prohibición del uso de misiles táctico-operativos Atacms y otras armas de fuego de largo alcance.

Desde Rusia acusaron al bloque militar de alentar a Ucrania a “continuar una guerra sin sentido”. El portavoz de la Presidencia rusa, Dmitri Peskov, advirtió de que esta política “tendrá sus consecuencias inevitablemente”. A juicio del vocero, Estados Unidos y otros países miembros de la OTAN “están desatando una nueva espiral de tensión” últimamente.

“Lo hacen de forma deliberada. No hacen, sino provocar un nuevo nivel de tensión”, enfatizó.

El vicepresidente del Consejo de Seguridad ruso, Dmitri Medvédev, comentando esta información, aseguró que “Ucrania y sus aliados” recibirán una respuesta devastadora si usan armas occidentales de largo alcance contra territorio ruso y que todo el equipo bélico y los especialistas que luchan contra Rusia “serán destruidos”.

FUENTE: latamnews.lat

Excomandante de la Armada de EE.UU. en Europa y África es detenido en un caso de soborno

Si se le declara culpable, se enfrentará a una pena de hasta 30 años de prisión.

Un excomandante de la Armada estadounidense en Europa y África fue detenido bajo cargos de corrupción, informó este viernes el Departamento de Justicia de Estados Unidos.

Robert Burke, de 62 años, fue detenido este 31 de mayo junto con dos empresarios, Yongchul ‘Charlie’ Kim y Meghan Messenger, “por cargos relacionados con su presunta participación en una trama de sobornos, en el marco de un contrato con el Gobierno de Estados Unidos”, especificó el Departamento en su página web.

La acusación, dada a conocer hoy, consta de cinco cargos referidos “a una presunta trama en la que el almirante aceptó futuros empleos en la empresa de los ejecutivos a cambio de la adjudicación de un contrato gubernamental”, se añade allí.

Si se le declara culpable, Robert Burke se enfrentará a una pena de hasta 30 años de prisión, y sus dos presuntos cómplices podrían pagar hasta 20 años de prisión.

La mayor parte del oro sale de África de contrabando

El contrabando de oro africano ha alcanzado proporciones alarmantes y Europa no queda fuera, en particular Suiza, que desempeña un papel central en el mercado negro.

En 2022 se exportaron clandestinamente desde África alrededor de 435 toneladas de oro, por un valor estimado de 31.000 millones de dólares, según un estudio reciente de Swissaid. La situación ilustra la gravedad del problema, que afecta a grandes sectores económicos.

Entre los principales destinatarios del contrabando figura de manera destacada Suiza, uno de los mayores importadores de oro procedente del mercado negro. Cada año se extraen en África entre 321 y 474 toneladas de oro artesanal que no se declara. La extracción representa un valor de entre 23.700 y 35.000 millones de dólares, lo que corresponde al 75 por cien de la producción total de oro artesanal del Continente Negro.

En el estudio de Swissaid, que abarca un período de once años entre 2012 y 2022, destaca una tendencia preocupante: el contrabando de oro se ha más que duplicado durante la década. El fenómeno se puede atribuir en parte al continuo aumento del precio del oro y a las crecientes dificultades económicas que enfrentan muchos países africanos.

En África hay una nueva fiebre del oro, marcada por la apertura de nuevas minas artesanales, caracterizadas por condiciones de trabajo deplorables.

La mayor parte del oro extraído ilegalmente en África pasa por países como Dubai, Suiza e India. En 2022 dos terceras partes, más de 400 toneladas, del oro importado por Emiratos Árabes Unidos desde África no estaba declarado para la exportación. Los verdaderos centros de este comercio, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, importaron 2.569 toneladas de oro africano entre 2021 y 2022 sin declaración de exportación, el equivalente a 115.300 millones de dólares.

Suiza, el segundo importador después de Emiratos, recibió más de 1.670 toneladas de oro procedente de Emiratos entre 2012 y 2022. La legislación suiza está diseñada para lavar el mercado negro y el oro procesado dentro del país se considera emiratí, por lo que oculta su verdadero origen africano y el contrabando, facilitando así su perpetuación.

Mali, Ghana y Zimbabue se encuentran entre los principales países africanos afectados por el contrabando de oro. Los flujos ilegales exacerban los problemas socioeconómicos de esos países, privando a los gobiernos de recursos cruciales.

FUENTE: mpr21.info

Moscow Has Right to Take Proxy War With NATO Global as Bloc Greenlights Strikes Deep Into Russia, by Ilya Tsukanov

This is getting ugly in a hurry. From Ilya Tsukanov at sputnikglobe.com:

The Biden administration joined with the leaders of Germany, Nordic countries and the Baltic states on Thursday by lifting formal restrictions on the use of NATO long-range strike systems sent to Ukraine to target areas deep inside Russia. Sputnik asked a leading European defense commentator about the move’s political and strategic implications.

Russian officials blasted Washington and its allies on Friday over the escalation of the Ukrainian proxy war through NATO countries’ decision to approve long-range attacks on Russia, with both the Kremlin and the Foreign Ministry pointing out that the alliance never shied away from allowing its proxies in Kiev to target the Russian hinterland.

“We are aware that attempts to strike Russian territory with American-made weapons are already being made. This is sufficient for us, and it clearly demonstrates the extent of the United States’ involvement in this conflict,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Friday.

Separately on Friday, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg confirmed that allies had approved long-range strike weapons’ deployment, and said the bloc expects Kiev to use these arms “in a responsible way” in line with international law.

Continue reading

The flight time of the Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile to the capitals of states supplying weapons to the Ukronazis was calculated:

  1. To 🇨🇦Ottawa – 850 seconds.
  2. To 🇩🇪Berlin – 106 seconds.
  3. To 🇬🇧London – 202 seconds.
  4. To 🇺🇸Washington — 995 seconds.
  5. To 🇫🇷Paris – 200 seconds.

Total:
The rocket consumption is 5 units and there is silence in the World, there are no more crises, wars, orange revolutions… … it’s scary, but it’s true, just information for those who don’t want to understand what can happen….

All arguments for those who want to fight with Russia have been exhausted.

To Avoid Nuclear War, Putin Needs to be a Little Crazier, by Mike Whitney

Russia is being attacked by NATO and Putin knows it. It’s time to do something about it, and don’t think Putin won’t pull the trigger. From Mike Whitney at unz.com:

President Putin’s press conference on Wednesday in Uzbekistan might have been the most unusual and extraordinary event in his 24-year political career. After addressing the Constitutional issues surrounding Ukrainian President Zelensky’s decision to remain in office beyond his four-year term, Putin delivered a brief but disturbing statement on NATO’s plan to fire long-range weapons at targets inside Russia. Putin made it clear that Russia would respond to these attacks and that the countries that provided the weapons systems would be held responsible. He also gave a very detailed description of how the systems work and how they require contractors from the country-of-origin be directly involved in their operation. What is so remarkable about Putin’s comments is not the fact that they bring the world closer to a direct confrontation between nuclear-armed adversaries, but that he had to remind political leaders in the West that Russia is not going to sit back and be their punching bag. Here’s part of what Putin said:

With regard to the strikes, frankly, I am not sure what the NATO Secretary General is talking about. When he was the Prime Minister of Norway, (we had good relations) and I am positive he was not suffering from dementia back then. If he is talking about potentially attacking Russia’s territory with long-range precision weapons, he, as a person who heads a military-political organisation, even though he is a civilian like me, should be aware of the fact that long-range precision weapons cannot be used without space-based reconnaissance. This is my first point.

My second point is that the final target selection and what is known as launch mission can only be made by highly skilled specialists who rely on this reconnaissance data, technical reconnaissance data. For some attack systems, such as Storm Shadow, these launch missions can be put in automatically, without the need to use Ukrainian military. Who does it? Those who manufacture and those who allegedly supply these attack systems to Ukraine do. This can and does happen without the participation of the Ukrainian military. Launching other systems, such as ATACMS, for example, also relies on space reconnaissance data, targets are identified and automatically communicated to the relevant crews that may not even realise what exactly they are putting in. A crew, maybe even a Ukrainian crew, then puts in the corresponding launch mission. However, the mission is put together by representatives of NATO countries, not the Ukrainian military. Putin Presser in Uzbekistan, Kremlin

Continue reading

Russia, SCO, BRICS: The normalization of Afghanistan, by Pepe Escobar

The country the U.S. couldn’t tame in over 20 years of fighting is lining up with the U.S.’s adversaries. Development and trade assistance beats bullets and bombs every time. From Pepe Escobar at strategic-culture.su:

The whole Russia-Taliban affair involves a humongous package – encompassing oil, gas, minerals and loads of rail connectivity.

This past Sunday in Doha, I had a meeting with three high-level representatives of the Taliban Political Office in Qatar, including a founding member of the body (in 2012) and a key official of the previous Taliban government of 1996-2001. By mutual consent, their names should not be made public.

The cordial meeting was brokered by Professor Sultan Barakat, who teaches at the College of Public Policy at Hamad bin Khalifa University – set in an outstanding, immaculate campus outside of Doha which attracts students from across the Global South. Prof. Barakat is one of those very few – discreet – players who knows everything that matters in West Asia, and in his case, also in the intersection of Central and South Asia.

With my three Taliban interlocutors, we talked extensively about the challenges of the new Taliban era, new development projects, the role of Russia-China, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). They were particularly curious about Russia, and posed several questions.

Professor Barakat is working on a parallel angle. He is conducting the work of the Afghanistan Future Thought Forum, whose 9th session took place in Oslo in mid-May, and was attended by 28 Afghans – men and women – as well as an array of diplomats of Iran, Pakistan, India, China, Turkey, U.S., UK and EU, among others.

The key discussions at the forum revolve around the extremely complex issue of the Taliban engagement with that fuzzy entity, the “international community”. In Doha, I directly asked my three interlocutors what is the Taliban’s number one priority: “The end of sanctions”, they replied.

For that to happen, the UN Security Council must overturn its 2003 decision of designating several members of the Taliban as a terrorist organization; and simultaneously, discrimination/demonization/sanctions by Washington need to go. As it stands, that remains an immensely tall order.

The forum – the next session should be held in Kabul, possibly in the Fall – is patiently working step by step. It’s a matter of successive concessions from both sides, building trust, and for that it’s essential to appoint an UN-recognized mediator, or “adviser for normalization” to supervise the whole process.

Continue reading

Je heftiger die Eskalation in der Ukraine, desto größer die Atomkriegsgefahr (Berliner Zeitung)

https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik-gesellschaft/geopolitik/je-heftiger-die-eskalation-in-der-ukraine-desto-groesser-die-atomkriegsgefahr-li.2214525?

DKP: »Kriegstreiber müssen gestoppt werden!« Erklärung der DKP zum Einsatz deutscher Waffen gegen Ziele in Russland. (junge Welt)

hier weiterlesen:
https://www.jungewelt.de/artikel/476435.dkp-kriegstreiber-m%C3%BCssen-gestoppt-werden.html

«J’ai sauvé l’économie française» : Bruno Le Maire ose tout, c’est à ça qu’on le reconnait

par Yoann

Dans un contexte économique très tendu, marqué par la récente dégradation de la note de la France par l’agence S&P, le ministre Bruno Le Maire a tenu à défendre son bilan, en des termes pour le moins osés…

Selon le Mozart de l’économie, les inquiétudes des agences de notation seraient principalement dues à la fragmentation de la vie politique française, et donc au manque de soutien dont bénéficierait le gouvernement. Une manière habile de rejeter la responsabilité sur les épaules de l’opposition.

Le ministre a ensuite énuméré avec fierté ses nombreuses réussites : «J’ai protégé les Français, j’ai sauvé les usines, j’ai sauvé les restaurateurs, j’ai sauvé les hôteliers, j’ai sauvé le monde de l’événementiel, j’ai sauvé des emplois, des compétences, la filière aéronautique». Et ce, tout en trouvant le temps d’écrire deux livres érotiques et de mettre à genoux l’économie russe, bien entendu.

Cependant, cette vision idyllique de la situation économique française contraste fortement avec la réalité vécue par de nombreux citoyens et entreprises. Les PME peinent à survivre, les Français sont de plus en plus nombreux à avoir froid en hiver et à sauter des repas.

La France se tape le pire déficit d’Europe mais Bruno Le Maire nous explique sans rire qu’il a sauvé l’économie française. Hallucinant. #MacronLeFléau #MacronDestitution pic.twitter.com/d3vMCQX6s7— Casper (@zairker) 

June 1, 2024

source : Le Média en 4-4-2

Создайте подобный сайт на WordPress.com
Начало работы