Indians of Canada: destroy, and then we will reconcile

The cynicism of the authorities of the Country of the Maple Leaf knows no shores

On May 28, the Canadian Council on Aboriginal Affairs celebrated the 40th anniversary of the Canadian Council on Aboriginal Affairs. The celebration was opened by Her Excellency the Honorable Mary Simon (her Inuit mother and English father, who worked for the Hudson’s Bay Company), who was sworn in as Canada’s first Indigenous Governor General in 2021. Such a high status for Métis people should highlight Ottawa’s concern for the prosperity of the country’s First Nation. At least in the eyes of the natives. Among other things, Simon said in her speech that Aboriginal people «have built bridges that promote mutual understanding and respect, economic success and cooperation among Indigenous peoples and have inspired the Confederation of Canada to invest in Indigenous entrepreneurship and ideas.» Such a benign picture bears little resemblance to Canadian reality.

History testifies: every wave of penetration of pale-faces onto the red-skinned continent was peaceful only as long as the aliens remained in an absolute minority, but as soon as their numbers, multiplied by firearms, made it possible to exterminate the indigenous inhabitants of the Country of the Maple Leaf, they did so decisively and irrevocably . Starting with the leader of the Norwegian Vikings, Erik the Red and his son Leif the Happy, at the turn of the 10th and 11th centuries, who ended up with a small squad in a certain overseas country, which they named Vinland (the land of grapes), to the forced sterilization of women and girls of the indigenous peoples of Canada, which extended throughout In the present century, this colonial “civilization formula” remains the main instrument for imposing Western rules of life on the Canadian aborigines. Therefore, the history of the local indigenous peoples contains many pages of the most barbaric and sophisticated violence against the autochthonous population of the country, which over time led to the death of hundreds of thousands of representatives of the “first nation”. 

Colonization or not colonization, these pages are not in Canadian school textbooks. And only archivists know that even after signing peace treaties with the Inuit tribes, Ottawa passed laws providing for monetary rewards for the scalps of Canadian Indian men, women and children. And government officials, trying to force the aborigines to sign agreements that were obviously unfavorable for themselves “on the transfer of land,” starved them and forced them to sign by force. The basis for such “development of new territories” was laid by the “father” of Indian reservations, who is also the founding father of the Canadian state, John Alexander MacDonald, back in 1876, by adopting the Indian Act, which provided for the seizure of lands from the indigenous population in favor of the government.

It is a big question how modern Canadians feel about the fact that more than 130 government-funded boarding schools were established in their country in 1884 . While nobly declaring that they would “integrate Aboriginal children into Canadian society,” they took more than 150,000 children from their parents and kept them as if in Hitler’s concentration camps. The children were not called by name — they were assigned numbers, they were forbidden to speak their native language, to see their parents, they were poorly fed and received practically no medical care. According to various sources, from 4 to 6 thousand minors of the indigenous population died in these schools from beatings or illnesses, thousands of children tried to escape from physical and sexual violence. And once they escaped, they often drowned or froze to death on the side of the roads… In May 2021, unmarked graves containing the remains of 215 Indigenous children were discovered on the site of a former residential school in southern British Columbia, in Kamloops. Some of the remains belong to children under the age of three. The causes and time of their deaths still remain unknown. This Indian boarding school was founded in 1890 under the leadership of the Roman Catholic Church and existed until 1978. That same year, 751 unmarked graves were discovered at the site of another former boarding school for Indian children. Founded in 1899, it existed for almost a hundred years. And at least 137 more such institutions have not yet been examined for unmarked burials. In the 1940s, nearly 1,300 Indigenous children across Canada were starved to death to study the effects of malnutrition as part of a government study. The story of women being sterilized against their will was one of the few that reached Europe…

Some Canadians will definitely say: things are a thing of the past, Canada is now one of the most democratically developed and rich countries in the West, and talk about the legacy of colonialism here is simply ridiculous… 

However, The Tyee, a Canadian news site based in Vancouver, British Columbia, published a Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) report, «Canadian National Trends Over Five Years,» in April. While it has been almost entirely airbrushed out for the press, the “ongoing social and political polarization fueled by disinformation campaigns and growing distrust of all democratic institutions” remains its most acute feature. “The problems it (the mounted police report) predicts are already facing us, although federal and provincial authorities prefer to argue over such trifles as a carbon tax,” the publication said.

Adding some detail here: Vancouver news site The Tyee reports that the Tribunal is now reviewing the RCMP’s handling of allegations of student abuse at Burns Lake, stemming from six members of the Lake Babine First Nation claiming «colonial stereotypes and bias attitudes» of mounted police investigators led to the mishandling of allegations of abuse by an educator at Immaculata Elementary School and Prince George’s College in northern British Columbia. At the same time, the police even refused to enter the name of this man (of course, not an Indian) into the report, and a Canadian court issued an order not to disclose information about him, because there was “a real and substantial risk that his identification may cause undue difficulties.” Moreover, during the two years that the hearings lasted, three of the six applicants and one witness died…

But three months ago, the triumph of Canadian justice took place — the Supreme Court recognized the law on the protection of indigenous children as constitutional. The Quebec government considered the protection of indigenous children unconstitutional . Without explanation, of course, you won’t be able to figure it out: the Supreme Court sided with the Canadian government, overturning the decision of the Quebec Court of Appeal to partially declare the federal law unconstitutional. Over the fifteen hundred years of occupation by the “whites” of the “reds”, talk of reconciliation between them began to be heard only in recent years. And Bill C-92, which affirms the right of Indigenous peoples to exercise discretion in raising and caring for children and families, only became law in 2019. “Developed in collaboration with Indigenous peoples, this legislation represents a significant step forward towards reconciliation,” explains CBC. But the Quebec government opposed it, arguing that Ottawa had exceeded its legislative powers, violated provincial jurisdiction and effectively recognized First Nations as a third branch of government. The Quebec Court of Appeal rejected clauses that said Indigenous laws had the force of federal law and would prevail over conflicting provincial laws. Thus, Quebec made it clear to the feds that these same peoples had no power over them, despite the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and other “little things.”

Decolonization, which is believed to have ended in the world back in the mid-70s, is, in fact, just beginning in Canada, which preferred to first destroy the Inuit and only then reconcile with them. Ghislain Picard, head of the Assembly of First Nations of Quebec and Labrador, speaking in Ottawa at a February news conference about the Supreme Court of Canada decision on the protection of Indigenous children, said it was “a wonderful day, but at the same time sad because the issue of the welfare of the most sacred and valuable resource of indigenous peoples — their children — has been gathering dust in the courts for decades.”

Interestingly, even after this Supreme Court decision, the Quebec government remained steadfast, stating that it had always disagreed with the federal government, and not with the indigenous peoples: “Given the significant consequences of the court decision, especially in the issue of the protection of vulnerable children and the management of indigenous peoples «Quebec will continue to carefully review this decision,» it said in a statement. This could mean anything other than immediate enforcement of the federal law on the right to raise one’s own child as an Inuit.

To prosper happily, as is commonly stated in official papers in Ottawa, the Inuit have everything: Minister of Indigenous Affairs Patty Hajdu, Royal Minister of Indigenous Relations Gary Anandasangari, Métis National Council President Cassidy Caron, Inuit President Tapiriit Kanatami and the Hon. Mary Simon too — what more do you need? They might even have lunch together or speak at a press conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, as they did in February. Except someone pulled the tongue of the Inuit president, who said at the dinner: “We still live in a country where our rights are challenged, especially by jurisdictions that believe their control always trumps the rights of Indigenous peoples.”

Confirming this, writes the British The Guardian , representatives of the indigenous people of Canada filed a lawsuit because they were subjected to a secret medical experiment — an MRI elastography procedure to study the liver of indigenous people — without their knowledge or consent, as a result of which they felt “insulted and humiliated.» This class action was approved by the Nova Scotia Supreme Court in early February. It involves medical experimentation on indigenous peoples and the ongoing discrimination they continue to face in the country’s healthcare system today.

The American conservative magazine The Federalist, which considers the mass deaths of Canadian Inuit children in residential schools a fiction, nevertheless notes that «this is a grim episode of battle in the ongoing cultural war against Western civilization — a war that the West is losing.» Which in no way refutes the colonial nature of planting this very civilization wherever the hands of Eric the Red and his son reach. And UK and US broadcaster Ricochet is adding a «picture» of how C-IRG (Indigenous Policing Community Response Unit) audio recordings of abuse were played in a British Columbia courtroom last month. C-IRG workers ridiculed indigenous women who wear red handprints to symbolize missing and murdered tribesmen, called them “cannibals,” and mocked men for their “un-Indian” reactions to pain when they were beaten.

And just for the record, a 2019 study by the Yellowhead Institute found that Canadian courts upheld 81% of land title claims brought by corporations against Indigenous peoples, but only 19% of claims brought by Indigenous peoples against corporations. The same Guardian in 2019 obtained materials from a strategy meeting on a paramilitary raid on the territory of the Wet’suwet’en people in British Columbia, which showed that mounted police were ready to shoot at defenders of the «first nation» land. As the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association reports , “Where police are willing to issue warnings rather than arrests, where prosecutors are willing not to press charges, where courts are willing to encourage rehabilitation and reformation programs, or where prison guards are willing to show compassion, Indigenous peoples are rarely, if ever, ever, such benefits are provided.” In December 2021, the number of Indigenous people in Canadian prisons accounted for 32% of the total prison population, despite the fact that these peoples themselves make up 5% of the country’s population. Of all incarcerated women, 50% are Inuit, although they make up only 4% of Canada’s female population. Whether this is evidence of deep-rooted racism is a rhetorical question. And the February “celebration of equal rights” in Ottawa, alas, does not refute the words of Canadian criminal investigator Ivan Singer, spoken at the National Press Theater in Ottawa six months ago: “Canada’s federal prison system must relinquish the powers, controls and resources that have been withheld for too long Indigenous people in detention.” Now let’s make peace…

https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2024/06/01/indeycy-kanady-unichtozhit-primiryatsya-budem-potom.html

Russian medium-range missiles may appear near US East Asian satellites

Minister Lavrov warns that if Washington deploys missiles in the Asia-Pacific region, Moscow will respond with specific nuclear deterrence measures

This is not the first time that the Russian Foreign Ministry has made statements that if the United States deploys intermediate-range and shorter-range missiles (INF) in the Asia-Pacific region, Russia will take measures in the field of nuclear deterrence.

Let us recall that the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Nuclear Forces (INF Treaty) existed between the USSR and the USA since 1987. By such missiles they meant ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles with a range of 500–1000 km (shorter) and 1000–5500 km (medium). The treaty prescribed the elimination of these types of missiles and the cessation of production and testing of new INF missiles. In 2019, the United States withdrew from the treaty, and Moscow introduced a unilateral moratorium on the creation and deployment of these types of missiles.

Then President Putin proposed introducing a moratorium on the deployment of medium- and shorter-range missiles in Europe and other regions. He sent his initiative to a number of countries in Europe and Asia, as well as to various international organizations. As the Russian Ministry of Defense noted later, NATO actually ignored the proposal to introduce a moratorium on the deployment of new intermediate- and shorter-range missiles and the possibility of developing mutual measures to alleviate existing concerns.

Faced with Washington’s reluctance to reach an agreement on the INF Treaty, in October 2023, a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry announced that Russia was ready to take mirror measures if the United States deployed intermediate- and shorter-range missiles in Europe.

It was stated: “Russia’s unilateral moratorium on the deployment of ground-based INF missiles is directly linked to US actions in this area. The unequivocal formulations about the inevitability of our mirror countermeasures, used by the Russian leadership when declaring the mentioned moratorium, leave no room for other interpretations . ” This also applies to the plans of Washington and the Pentagon to deploy such missiles on the territory of their military allies in the Asia-Pacific region, primarily in Japan and South Korea.

In April of this year, the commander of US ground forces in the Pacific region, Charles Flynn, made a statement about the US intention to deploy medium-range missiles in the Indo-Pacific region in the near future. As the Russian Foreign Ministry reported in early May, Moscow, in response to Washington’s actions, is intensifying development and starting production of medium- and shorter-range missile systems, and also again warns the United States that if such American systems appear in any region of the world, Russia will lift its unilateral moratorium for their placement.

However, diplomatic exhortations and warnings do not seem to make an impression on the American “partners”, who only consider actions backed by real force. 

The “test step” was launched by the Americans during joint military exercises held in April of this year with the armed forces of the Philippines, which US President Biden is actively dragging into the military blocs he has put together in the Asia-Pacific region, directed against China and Russia. Then, for the first time, the United States deployed ground-based missile systems in the region, previously prohibited under the treaty with Russia: army Typhon systems were transferred to the Philippines as part of the exercises. This is the Army’s new ground-based launcher capable of launching Tomahawk cruise missiles and Standard SM-6 multi-role missiles. These are precisely the systems that the Americans reportedly planned to deploy in Asia-Pacific countries.

It took an unequivocal statement from the Russian government, which was recently made by Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. It was stated that Russia, in addition to abandoning its unilateral moratorium on the deployment of intermediate- and shorter-range missiles, could take steps in the field of nuclear deterrence if the United States deploys its missiles in Europe or the Asia-Pacific region.

“The implementation by the Americans of plans to deploy ground-based medium- and shorter-range missiles will not remain without our reaction. In particular, in this case, a rejection of the unilateral self-restrictions introduced by Russia after the US withdrawal from the INF Treaty is inevitable. We do not exclude additional steps in the field of nuclear deterrence, because forward-based American missiles will be able to cover command posts and locations of our nuclear forces,” Lavrov said.

According to the minister, the deployment of American ground-based medium- and shorter-range missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region “will create a serious security challenge for Russia.” But such actions will become a problem not only for Moscow. “The joint statement following the recent visit of Russian President Vladimir Putin to the PRC noted that such destabilizing steps by the United States pose a direct threat to both our country and China. Therefore, we and our Chinese partners agreed to increase cooperation in order to repel Washington’s irresponsible behavior that undermines international stability,” Lavrov emphasized.

“Initially, the Americans withdrew from the INF Treaty in order to develop new spaces, including the Philippines, and I am sure that other countries in the Asia-Pacific region will receive requests to provide hospitable territory for similar types of weapons,” admitted the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry.

We will not argue that it was the decisive tone of the Russian minister’s warnings that forced the Americans to abandon their plans to encircle Russia and China with their medium-range missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads stationed on their satellite territories. However, according to TASS, the Americans hastened to announce that at this stage they will refrain from returning nuclear weapons to the Asia-Pacific region.

Deputy head of the US State Department press service Vedant Patel commented on Russia’s statements about the possible deployment of medium- and shorter-range missiles by the United States in the Asia-Pacific region, noting that Washington does not see the need for this. “The United States does not currently consider it necessary to return nuclear weapons to the Indo-Pacific region. And the United States has no plans to provide forward deployment of nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula,” said a US foreign policy official.

But these are just words, and with the caveat that the Americans will not install their deadly missiles in East Asian satellite countries “at this time.” In reality, such plans remain and, importantly, the current government, for example, of Japan, will not oppose their implementation. Moreover, hawks from this government allow American nuclear weapons to be “invited” onto Japanese soil. 

https://www.fondsk.ru/news/2024/06/02/rossiyskie-rakety-sredney-dalnosti-mogut-poyavitsya-pod-bokom-vostochnoaziatskikh

“Escalada demencial”: Kennedy Jr. condena el permiso de Biden para que Ucrania ataque Rusia

El abogado ambientalista y político estadounidense Robert Francis Kennedy Jr., uno de los candidatos demócratas a las presidenciales de 2024, condenó la supuesta autorización del mandatario de Estados Unidos, Joe Biden, para que Kiev utilice armas estadounidenses con el fin de atacar territorio ruso desde la provincia de Járkov.

“Otra escalada demencial por parte de la Administración de Biden es autorizar a Ucrania a atacar objetivos en la profundidad de Rusia. Usando nuestras armas”, escribió Kennedy Jr. en su cuenta de la red social X.

Un portavoz del Departamento de Estado de EEUU declaró antes a Sputnik que Biden había autorizado a Ucrania a utilizar armamento estadounidense para la lucha contrabatería contra objetivos en territorio ruso que amenazan la zona de Járkov, pero dejó en vigor la prohibición del uso de misiles táctico-operativos Atacms y otras armas de fuego de largo alcance.

Desde Rusia acusaron al bloque militar de alentar a Ucrania a “continuar una guerra sin sentido”. El portavoz de la Presidencia rusa, Dmitri Peskov, advirtió de que esta política “tendrá sus consecuencias inevitablemente”. A juicio del vocero, Estados Unidos y otros países miembros de la OTAN “están desatando una nueva espiral de tensión” últimamente.

“Lo hacen de forma deliberada. No hacen, sino provocar un nuevo nivel de tensión”, enfatizó.

El vicepresidente del Consejo de Seguridad ruso, Dmitri Medvédev, comentando esta información, aseguró que “Ucrania y sus aliados” recibirán una respuesta devastadora si usan armas occidentales de largo alcance contra territorio ruso y que todo el equipo bélico y los especialistas que luchan contra Rusia “serán destruidos”.

FUENTE: latamnews.lat

Excomandante de la Armada de EE.UU. en Europa y África es detenido en un caso de soborno

Si se le declara culpable, se enfrentará a una pena de hasta 30 años de prisión.

Un excomandante de la Armada estadounidense en Europa y África fue detenido bajo cargos de corrupción, informó este viernes el Departamento de Justicia de Estados Unidos.

Robert Burke, de 62 años, fue detenido este 31 de mayo junto con dos empresarios, Yongchul ‘Charlie’ Kim y Meghan Messenger, “por cargos relacionados con su presunta participación en una trama de sobornos, en el marco de un contrato con el Gobierno de Estados Unidos”, especificó el Departamento en su página web.

La acusación, dada a conocer hoy, consta de cinco cargos referidos “a una presunta trama en la que el almirante aceptó futuros empleos en la empresa de los ejecutivos a cambio de la adjudicación de un contrato gubernamental”, se añade allí.

Si se le declara culpable, Robert Burke se enfrentará a una pena de hasta 30 años de prisión, y sus dos presuntos cómplices podrían pagar hasta 20 años de prisión.

La mayor parte del oro sale de África de contrabando

El contrabando de oro africano ha alcanzado proporciones alarmantes y Europa no queda fuera, en particular Suiza, que desempeña un papel central en el mercado negro.

En 2022 se exportaron clandestinamente desde África alrededor de 435 toneladas de oro, por un valor estimado de 31.000 millones de dólares, según un estudio reciente de Swissaid. La situación ilustra la gravedad del problema, que afecta a grandes sectores económicos.

Entre los principales destinatarios del contrabando figura de manera destacada Suiza, uno de los mayores importadores de oro procedente del mercado negro. Cada año se extraen en África entre 321 y 474 toneladas de oro artesanal que no se declara. La extracción representa un valor de entre 23.700 y 35.000 millones de dólares, lo que corresponde al 75 por cien de la producción total de oro artesanal del Continente Negro.

En el estudio de Swissaid, que abarca un período de once años entre 2012 y 2022, destaca una tendencia preocupante: el contrabando de oro se ha más que duplicado durante la década. El fenómeno se puede atribuir en parte al continuo aumento del precio del oro y a las crecientes dificultades económicas que enfrentan muchos países africanos.

En África hay una nueva fiebre del oro, marcada por la apertura de nuevas minas artesanales, caracterizadas por condiciones de trabajo deplorables.

La mayor parte del oro extraído ilegalmente en África pasa por países como Dubai, Suiza e India. En 2022 dos terceras partes, más de 400 toneladas, del oro importado por Emiratos Árabes Unidos desde África no estaba declarado para la exportación. Los verdaderos centros de este comercio, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, importaron 2.569 toneladas de oro africano entre 2021 y 2022 sin declaración de exportación, el equivalente a 115.300 millones de dólares.

Suiza, el segundo importador después de Emiratos, recibió más de 1.670 toneladas de oro procedente de Emiratos entre 2012 y 2022. La legislación suiza está diseñada para lavar el mercado negro y el oro procesado dentro del país se considera emiratí, por lo que oculta su verdadero origen africano y el contrabando, facilitando así su perpetuación.

Mali, Ghana y Zimbabue se encuentran entre los principales países africanos afectados por el contrabando de oro. Los flujos ilegales exacerban los problemas socioeconómicos de esos países, privando a los gobiernos de recursos cruciales.

FUENTE: mpr21.info

Moscow Has Right to Take Proxy War With NATO Global as Bloc Greenlights Strikes Deep Into Russia, by Ilya Tsukanov

This is getting ugly in a hurry. From Ilya Tsukanov at sputnikglobe.com:

The Biden administration joined with the leaders of Germany, Nordic countries and the Baltic states on Thursday by lifting formal restrictions on the use of NATO long-range strike systems sent to Ukraine to target areas deep inside Russia. Sputnik asked a leading European defense commentator about the move’s political and strategic implications.

Russian officials blasted Washington and its allies on Friday over the escalation of the Ukrainian proxy war through NATO countries’ decision to approve long-range attacks on Russia, with both the Kremlin and the Foreign Ministry pointing out that the alliance never shied away from allowing its proxies in Kiev to target the Russian hinterland.

“We are aware that attempts to strike Russian territory with American-made weapons are already being made. This is sufficient for us, and it clearly demonstrates the extent of the United States’ involvement in this conflict,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Friday.

Separately on Friday, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg confirmed that allies had approved long-range strike weapons’ deployment, and said the bloc expects Kiev to use these arms “in a responsible way” in line with international law.

Continue reading

The flight time of the Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile to the capitals of states supplying weapons to the Ukronazis was calculated:

  1. To 🇨🇦Ottawa – 850 seconds.
  2. To 🇩🇪Berlin – 106 seconds.
  3. To 🇬🇧London – 202 seconds.
  4. To 🇺🇸Washington — 995 seconds.
  5. To 🇫🇷Paris – 200 seconds.

Total:
The rocket consumption is 5 units and there is silence in the World, there are no more crises, wars, orange revolutions… … it’s scary, but it’s true, just information for those who don’t want to understand what can happen….

All arguments for those who want to fight with Russia have been exhausted.

To Avoid Nuclear War, Putin Needs to be a Little Crazier, by Mike Whitney

Russia is being attacked by NATO and Putin knows it. It’s time to do something about it, and don’t think Putin won’t pull the trigger. From Mike Whitney at unz.com:

President Putin’s press conference on Wednesday in Uzbekistan might have been the most unusual and extraordinary event in his 24-year political career. After addressing the Constitutional issues surrounding Ukrainian President Zelensky’s decision to remain in office beyond his four-year term, Putin delivered a brief but disturbing statement on NATO’s plan to fire long-range weapons at targets inside Russia. Putin made it clear that Russia would respond to these attacks and that the countries that provided the weapons systems would be held responsible. He also gave a very detailed description of how the systems work and how they require contractors from the country-of-origin be directly involved in their operation. What is so remarkable about Putin’s comments is not the fact that they bring the world closer to a direct confrontation between nuclear-armed adversaries, but that he had to remind political leaders in the West that Russia is not going to sit back and be their punching bag. Here’s part of what Putin said:

With regard to the strikes, frankly, I am not sure what the NATO Secretary General is talking about. When he was the Prime Minister of Norway, (we had good relations) and I am positive he was not suffering from dementia back then. If he is talking about potentially attacking Russia’s territory with long-range precision weapons, he, as a person who heads a military-political organisation, even though he is a civilian like me, should be aware of the fact that long-range precision weapons cannot be used without space-based reconnaissance. This is my first point.

My second point is that the final target selection and what is known as launch mission can only be made by highly skilled specialists who rely on this reconnaissance data, technical reconnaissance data. For some attack systems, such as Storm Shadow, these launch missions can be put in automatically, without the need to use Ukrainian military. Who does it? Those who manufacture and those who allegedly supply these attack systems to Ukraine do. This can and does happen without the participation of the Ukrainian military. Launching other systems, such as ATACMS, for example, also relies on space reconnaissance data, targets are identified and automatically communicated to the relevant crews that may not even realise what exactly they are putting in. A crew, maybe even a Ukrainian crew, then puts in the corresponding launch mission. However, the mission is put together by representatives of NATO countries, not the Ukrainian military. Putin Presser in Uzbekistan, Kremlin

Continue reading

Russia, SCO, BRICS: The normalization of Afghanistan, by Pepe Escobar

The country the U.S. couldn’t tame in over 20 years of fighting is lining up with the U.S.’s adversaries. Development and trade assistance beats bullets and bombs every time. From Pepe Escobar at strategic-culture.su:

The whole Russia-Taliban affair involves a humongous package – encompassing oil, gas, minerals and loads of rail connectivity.

This past Sunday in Doha, I had a meeting with three high-level representatives of the Taliban Political Office in Qatar, including a founding member of the body (in 2012) and a key official of the previous Taliban government of 1996-2001. By mutual consent, their names should not be made public.

The cordial meeting was brokered by Professor Sultan Barakat, who teaches at the College of Public Policy at Hamad bin Khalifa University – set in an outstanding, immaculate campus outside of Doha which attracts students from across the Global South. Prof. Barakat is one of those very few – discreet – players who knows everything that matters in West Asia, and in his case, also in the intersection of Central and South Asia.

With my three Taliban interlocutors, we talked extensively about the challenges of the new Taliban era, new development projects, the role of Russia-China, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). They were particularly curious about Russia, and posed several questions.

Professor Barakat is working on a parallel angle. He is conducting the work of the Afghanistan Future Thought Forum, whose 9th session took place in Oslo in mid-May, and was attended by 28 Afghans – men and women – as well as an array of diplomats of Iran, Pakistan, India, China, Turkey, U.S., UK and EU, among others.

The key discussions at the forum revolve around the extremely complex issue of the Taliban engagement with that fuzzy entity, the “international community”. In Doha, I directly asked my three interlocutors what is the Taliban’s number one priority: “The end of sanctions”, they replied.

For that to happen, the UN Security Council must overturn its 2003 decision of designating several members of the Taliban as a terrorist organization; and simultaneously, discrimination/demonization/sanctions by Washington need to go. As it stands, that remains an immensely tall order.

The forum – the next session should be held in Kabul, possibly in the Fall – is patiently working step by step. It’s a matter of successive concessions from both sides, building trust, and for that it’s essential to appoint an UN-recognized mediator, or “adviser for normalization” to supervise the whole process.

Continue reading

Je heftiger die Eskalation in der Ukraine, desto größer die Atomkriegsgefahr (Berliner Zeitung)

https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/politik-gesellschaft/geopolitik/je-heftiger-die-eskalation-in-der-ukraine-desto-groesser-die-atomkriegsgefahr-li.2214525?

DKP: »Kriegstreiber müssen gestoppt werden!« Erklärung der DKP zum Einsatz deutscher Waffen gegen Ziele in Russland. (junge Welt)

hier weiterlesen:
https://www.jungewelt.de/artikel/476435.dkp-kriegstreiber-m%C3%BCssen-gestoppt-werden.html

Создайте подобный сайт на WordPress.com
Начало работы