Although it is not openly accepted by the West, everyone is aware that the Syrian war has ended and the Baath Party will complete this process successfully.
As the 14-year war in Syria draws to an end, what remains is a Syrian economy trying to recover, and large masses of people struggling with poverty.
Ongoing conflicts cannot dislodge Baath and President Bashar Assad. Syria has become the hardest rock of the “Arab Spring,” a project to reshape the Middle East in accordance with American interests.
The Syrian administration and people have resisted foreign military interventions, especially the USA, and various terrorist organizations, especially ISIS, for 14 years. All attacks encountered great resistance from the people and Syrian administration.
Although it is not openly accepted by the West, everyone is aware that the Syrian war has ended and the Baath Party will complete this process successfully.
However, this 14-year destruction in the country brought various serious problems, especially for the economy.
At this point, it would be useful to pay attention to President Assad’s speech at the recent extended meeting of the Central Committee of the Arab Socialist Baath Party.
In his speech at the meeting, Assad underlined that ideology is decisive and makes important inferences about the future of the party and the country, especially the economy.
“The role of ideological parties is much more important”
Emphasizing in his speech that “under global conditions where the whole world is witnessing cultural and ideological wars, ideological parties have become much more important than before,” Assad said: “The discourse that the age of ideologies is over was marketed 30 years ago. The claim that the era of ideological parties was over is not true. Therefore, the role of ideological parties, especially the Baath Party in Syria, is much more important than it is today”.
“Is there a middle ground?”
It would not be an exaggeration to say that Assad, who said, “We need to determine the model that is suitable for us in terms of ensuring social justice,” made various ideological expansions regarding the Baath Party’s goal of building socialism. In his speech, Assad points out the system known in the world as “Chinese socialism,” in which capitalist market relations continued to exist during the socialist period:
“How will the economic rise of the Baath Party take place? Based on ideology? Based on economic rules? Is there a compatibility or contradiction between the two? Or is there middle ground? We can handle and manage the ideological side within the same framework as the rules of economics, and simultaneously return to it. What is the possibility of an economy that can carry ideological rules but is not exhausted in the meantime?”
Maintaining the socialist approach
Also talking about the balance that needs to be established between economy and social principles, Assad said: If we only use the word ‘market,’ it means that we have turned into a brutal market economy. “The word social is what protects the socialist approach and in the meantime protects competition in the market,” he said.
Can socialism and a market economy coexist?
At this point, Assad refers to an example from China. The Syrian leader points to the period of Reform and Opening during the Deng Xiaoping period, which was declared in December 1978 and was later known as the “Deng Xiaoping Theory”:
“There are those who say that socialism and the market cannot go together. This is not true because the Chinese model is open to the entire world. China moved towards a market economy in 1978 and has been a communist, centralized socialist country ever since. On the other hand, the sublime situation here is that the party has stood with the workers from the very beginning.”
“The state ruled by the Baath is the state of all the people”
In terms of the construction of socialism and economic development goals in Syria, Assad is taking China’s anti-poverty campaigns as an example. Furthermore, the Syrian leader says the following:
“Of course, by definition the poor are also working class, but they are much poorer than other people. Therefore, should we consider the poor first?
First, I discuss the poor, which is the largest segment. It is natural for the party to side with the wider segment most affected by economic crises.
A state governed by the Baath Party is one for all people. So, what could be the program or approach that the Baath Party could adopt that expresses the common interests between different segments rather than a contradiction in which one segment can gain at the expense of the other?”
Ukraine is a black hole and only a fool pours billions of dollars of cash into it and expects an outcome.
NATO’s role in the Ukraine war and the credibility of western elites in general seems to be reaching what could be called a tipping point. This is evident with the level of panic we are seeing from Emmanuel Macron and others who in reality don’t have the silver bullet for how to get out of Ukraine without it looking like a humungous western defeat. The tension is really about the self-preservation politically of the French president as well as Scholz in Germany and of course Biden. How will these leaders explain that the west, emboldened by an even bigger NATO, has essentially been defeated? For Biden, the iconic video footage of hundreds of Afghans running along the tarmac as a C130 transport plane takes off from Kabul will probably remain as a damning eulogy of U.S. foreign policy – with really nothing comparing to it since the last days of Vietnam. For Macron, losing to Russia three key French speaking satellites in Africa – Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger – under his watch is also a spectacular failure which he has managed better than Biden. But if this year Russia gains ground in Ukraine, there will be little if anything the West will be able to, other than plan more false flag attacks and crank up the so-called Russian threats towards Ukrainian nuclear power plants. The West is losing. It’s like watching a car crash in slow motion and it will be left to the military and geopolitical buffs to pour over the ashes to see what were the warning signs early on which should have been red flags to have stopped the madness.
Right from the very beginning, the ineptitude of western leaders was breath-taking. Miscalculation was in overdrive on every level but never more so on sanctions. If you get the feeling that when western leaders like Macron take to western media to bang on the “more military spending” or “troops to Ukraine” drum it is simply that they have run out of moronic ideas and all that is left is a sham PR exercise in protecting themselves from the more acerbic attacks which they have factored.
Macron doesn’t want NATO troops in Ukraine. This is the first lie of many peddled. But in the same week as Ukraine passes a law which lowers its own minimal age for conscripts, the ugly truth of Macron’s Economist interview is that we are entering a new level of stupidity and so we need even more radical, brain dead ideas which at the very least can muster up a war atmosphere – which of course allows western governments to gouge themselves on an even bigger feast for their bellies in the form of eroding the last remnants of civil liberties.
A former British diplomat who was in the British embassy in Moscow and advising the UK government lifts the lid on just how futile Russian sanctions have been. Ian Proud was left aghast when officials in London instructed him to enact sanctions against officials who had no assets at all in the UK and made London look deluded at best and stupid at worst. All that the UK is investing in is longer-term resentment on the Russian side which pushes further back the possibility of negotiating later on questioning the “real foreign policy choice in Ukraine, which has always been whether to commit to war or peace with Russia. The eight Foreign Secretaries since 2014 have wanted neither” he points out.
The West has simply run out of ideas and has no strategy now as it knows only too well that 50bn dollar’s worth of kit from the U.S. on its way isn’t going to make any difference at all, given that half of it will be sold on the international black market and the rest will be misused by a dwindling and poorly trained Ukrainian army. NATO’s solution is to throw more money on the bonfire of vanity and hope the warmth that it generates for a few precious moments keeps everyone distracted away from the chilling truth that nothing is working for the West in the war but only backfiring. If NATO gets approval from its own members to stump up another 100bn in the coming days, this will also be like using gasoline to put out a fire. Ukraine doesn’t have the numbers of troops and certainly not the quality to use the equipment and it beggars belief that western media can’t see how even increased levels of fevered funding isn’t doing anything at all there. Ukraine is a black hole and only a fool pours billions of dollars of cash into it and expects an outcome. Even when you throw a pebble into a well you are rewarded with a faint ‘plop’.
Eindrücke von Veranstaltungen zum Tag der Befreiung vom Faschismus
1. von 7 Fotos
Joshua Regitz/jWUnter wachsamen Blicken der Staatsgewalt am Ehrenmal im Treptower Park (Berlin, 9.5.2024)Jadranko Marja/Eibner-Pressefoto/imagoZum 8. Mai ein Dank an die Befreier vom Faschismus: Sowjetisches Ehrenmal im Treptower ParkFabrizio Bensch/REUTERSRote Nelken schmücken den T-34 Panzer am sowjetischen Ehrenmal im Tiergarten (Berlin, 8.5.2024)Nick Brauns/jWGedenkveranstaltung zum Tag der Befreiung am sowjetischen Ehrenfriedhof in Bernau bei BerlinHärtelPRESS/imagoKranzniederlegung der Vereinigung der Verfolgten des Naziregimes (VVN-BdA) auf dem Sowjetischen Ehrenfriedhof in Chemnitz (8.5.2024)Jadranko Marja/Eibner-Pressefoto/imagoRote Nelken mit Antikriegsbotschaft am Sowjetischen Ehrenmal im Treptower Park (Berlin, 8.5.2024)Christoph Soeder/dpaDie Fahnen der Befreier waren verboten: Am Sowjetischen Ehrenmal im Treptower Park (Berlin, 9.5.2024)Joshua Regitz/jWUnter wachsamen Blicken der Staatsgewalt am Ehrenmal im Treptower Park (Berlin, 9.5.2024)Jadranko Marja/Eibner-Pressefoto/imagoZum 8. Mai ein Dank an die Befreier vom Faschismus: Sowjetisches Ehrenmal im Treptower ParkFabrizio Bensch/REUTERSRote Nelken schmücken den T-34 Panzer am sowjetischen Ehrenmal im Tiergarten (Berlin, 8.5.2024)Nick Brauns/jWGedenkveranstaltung zum Tag der Befreiung am sowjetischen Ehrenfriedhof in Bernau bei BerlinHärtelPRESS/imagoKranzniederlegung der Vereinigung der Verfolgten des Naziregimes (VVN-BdA) auf dem Sowjetischen Ehrenfriedhof in Chemnitz (8.5.2024)Jadranko Marja/Eibner-Pressefoto/imagoRote Nelken mit Antikriegsbotschaft am Sowjetischen Ehrenmal im Treptower Park (Berlin, 8.5.2024)Christoph Soeder/dpaDie Fahnen der Befreier waren verboten: Am Sowjetischen Ehrenmal im Treptower Park (Berlin, 9.5.2024)Joshua Regitz/jWUnter wachsamen Blicken der Staatsgewalt am Ehrenmal im Treptower Park (Berlin, 9.5.2024)
Wer am Mittwoch oder Donnerstag in Berlin im Umfeld der sowjetischen Ehrenmale an die Zerschlagung des deutschen Faschismus im Jahr 1945 erinnern wollte, konnte das nur unter polizeilicher Aufsicht und nach Überwindung einiger Hindernisse tun. Die Allgemeinverfügung, die das Zeigen sowjetischer und russischer Symbole und Flaggen an diesen Orten des Gedenkens verbot, eröffnete allerhand Spielraum für Eingriffe und Schikanen unter dem Vorwand, angeblich drohende Zwischenfälle vor dem Hintergrund des Ukraine-Krieges zu verhindern. Allein: Außerhalb Berlins, wo ebenfalls zahlreiche kleinere Veranstaltungen ohne solche Auflagen stattfanden, gab es keinerlei Vorkommnisse. In Berlin erhielt man derweil unterschiedliche Informationen von der Polizei über die Reichweite der Allgemeinverfügung: Am Treptower Park bestritt ein Polizeiführer auf Befragen gegenüber jW, dass es ein explizites Verbot des Mitführens der Zeitung gebe. Man habe die Besucher nur durch Ansprache für das Motiv auf der Titelseite »sensibilisieren« wollen. Eine Sprecherin der Polizei erklärte dagegen, die Titelseite falle unter die Allgemeinverfügung. (jW)
«No wailing wall photo, no pushing atrocity propaganda, no destroying your first amendment for ‘anti-semitism,’ no AIPAC shekels, no re-election, and those tapes of you with kiddies get released.»
If you want to make me fu**ing hate the people you want me to like, keep doing this, keep telling me you’re going to put me in fu**ing jail, in this case for an opinion I didn’t even hold. You motherfu**ers.
—Based Scott Adams
Step 1: Purchase the Empire of Lies. Own its politicians, media, entertainment, and mind-raping apparatus. Use bribery, or more effectively blackmail to control selected officeholders for life and get them to vote exactly how you want. Use atrocity propaganda from the previous century’s most lied-about historical events as emotional blackmail for mind control of the Empire’s subjects via public education and their favorite entertainment mediums. Shalom Señor Spielbergo!
Step 2: Loot its treasury for your gain. Cycle that money back to its politicians via AIPAC who will then send you more money! Use its military and sacrifice its young men and women in uniform for five conflicts declared in official documents in the late nineties. Threaten “Islamic terror attacks” publicly and in your Prime Minister’s book Fighting Terrorism on their home soil including the WTC towers in advance of those wars and the very “Terrorism” that you create
Step 3: Plan and execute 9/11 with partner intel agencies
Step 4: Use the Empire as your proxy military force, spying apparatus, and information controller to imprint your status as “greatest ally” on the pea brains of Empire subjects who are now all-in on your victimhood status, while simultaneously being the opposite—its greatest enemy. Inflitrate all of its tech monopolies with your state agents to algorithmically manipulate and control the minds of its tax-paying wage slaves
Step 6: Flood western Gentile nations that have notable Jewish populations with millions of your declared enemies to demographically destroy those nations while instilling fear in Jews, driving your “Chosen People” back to their “only safe home”— “The Promised Land”
Step 7: Use those enemies you helped create now deeply embedded in those Western nations along with their college campus useful idiots to organize “violent protests” against your criminal actions while calling them “terrorists” and “terrorist sympathizers” and infiltrate these groups stirring the chaos and amplifying their incompetence to use them as justification to pass “anti-semitism awareness” legislation with help from Step 1 to trample on the Empire’s founding document, now just a neat abstraction
Step 8: Get your bribed and blackmailed politicians to repeat your atrocity propaganda ad nauseam in advance of more looting bills and anti-1A legislation. Be sure to add babies and ovens to your atrocity propaganda, to cover for your second 9/11 on October 7th, 2023. Babies and ovens play very well with the Empire’s brainwashed subjects
Step 9: Use Jewish “fear” to usher in censorship, especially criticism of Israel to cover your war crimes and genocide, and equate Zionism with your most effective victimhood cudgle— anti-semitism. Amplify that fear in the media you control. Divide the empire into two distinct groups while raising the temperature of violence between them as you continue your ethnic cleansing operations, settlement “acquisitions” and land grabs
Step 10: Watch the Empire descend into civil strife so it is no longer “safe” for your “Chosen People” who will rush to Palm Beach or “The Promised Land” with future generations of IDF soldiers in their “ovens” and all their assets and property to invest in your rapidly expanding apartheid ethnostate
The cost of owning absolute clowns and traitors? $100 million every election cycle, plus a few minutes in front of a camera in a basement with “missing” children.
U.S. Senate letter to the ICC protecting Israeli war criminals. Americans wonder why the same assholes get reelected cycle after cycle, and they ask the question as if it’s some great mystery on what organization/ethnostate has a 98% success rate and openly brags about it.
When the boomers go, so goes U.S. support for Israel.
That’s why they have to take out TikTok. There’s far too much noticing going on with Millennials and Zoomers.
Will Substack be next?
When Zoomers rewrite the LSAT in the year 2050:
If some selected representatives are blackmailed, and all selected representatives take money from Israel, then most selected representatives are definitely unelected Zionist cock-sucking pedophiles.
2017 – But unlike what happens in solar fusion—which uses ordinary hydrogen—Earth-bound fusion reactors that burn neutron-rich isotopes have byproducts that are anything but harmless: Energetic neutron streams comprise 80 percent of the fusion energy output of deuterium-tritium reactions and 35 percent of deuterium-deuterium reactions.
Interestingly as I have mentioned before elsewhere, the single word anagram of Geneva is ‘avenge’. Is the WHO based here for a reason, if so avenge what? Or who?
I note that Geneva, Switzerland anagrams to ‘dwelt Nazis avenger’. So maybe the Nazis are seeking vengeance.
Anyway, many people are blaming the WHO for many of the health problems today. I have said this in 2020 that Roger Daltrey and Pete Townshend should sue!
But what is the WHO up to? Perhaps firstly I will state that the basis of it is as a United Nations (UN) organization. Please note with a ‘z’ as it is the USA which has dominated and they like their z’s over there.
So let’s look at aspects of the WHO. These are my selection of what I consider key points. I use the link below as the basis for discussion.
The WHO was established on 7 April 1948 and convened its first meeting on 24 July of that year. It incorporated the assets, personnel, and duties of the League of Nations’ Health Organization and the Paris-based Office International d’Hygiène Publique, including the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). The agency’s work began in earnest in 1951 after a significant infusion of financial and technical resources.
“a significant infusion of financial and technical resources” i.e. a lot of money. Whose money I am not quite sure, but no doubt taxpayers’.
The WHO’s official mandate is to promote health and safety while helping the vulnerable worldwide. It provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards, collects data on global health issues, and serves as a forum for scientific or policy discussions related to health. Its official publication, the World Health Report, provides assessments of worldwide health topics.
Please note it has a mandate and that this mandate is authority to set guidelines rather than you must do something specifically.
Or at least that was the original intention.
The WHO has played a leading role in several public health achievements, most notably the eradication of smallpox, the near-eradication of polio, and the development of an Ebola vaccine. Its current priorities include communicable diseases, particularly HIV/AIDS, Ebola, COVID-19, malaria and tuberculosis; non-communicable diseases such as heart disease and cancer; healthy diet, nutrition, and food security; occupational health; and substance abuse. The agency advocates for universal health care coverage, engagement with the monitoring of public health risks, coordinating responses to health emergencies, and promoting health and well-being generally.
Now here we must take exception to what Wikipedia states. Let’s take the claims.
Eradication of smallpox
As far as I can tell this seems to have focused on vaccination. As I now know vaccination is a fraud, smallpox cannot have been eradicated by vaccination which merely injects poison into a person. Poisoning people has never been good for health.
And whilst I have yet to do a detailed post on smallpox, how can anybody be sure that what is called smallpox is smallpox? That is, who defines it and why should they be correct?
Even the Wikipedia link on smallpox says the ‘…modified smallpox occurred mostly in previously vaccinated people.’
And
This form of variola major was more easily confused with chickenpox.
Well that sounds like vaccination is a problem doesn’t it, even I can work that one out. Get vaccinated and get smallpox even if it is (allegedly) not as bad as full blown smallpox whatever that really is.
But there is this chart too.
So being vaccinated doesn’t eliminate the risks according to the data and in all case there is still a large proportion of vaccinated dying relative to unvaccinated. Sounds like COVID 19, a.k.a. the ‘flu, vaccines.
Near-eradication of polio
In the USA
The medical doctor and virologist Jonas Salk put forward a promising vaccine and in the spring of 1953, the foundation rolled out a large-scale trial of the Salk vaccine for which 1.83 million children in 44 US states received either a placebo or the vaccine shot.
And
On April 12, 1955, the tenth anniversary of Roosevelt’s death, Francis announced that Salk’s vaccine was effective and potent in preventing polio.
and
Shortly afterwards Dr. Albert Sabin introduced a live polio vaccine that could be administered orally (rather than Salk’s by injection), the oral polio vaccine (OPV).
What can be noted though is polio cases were dropping substantially from a high in 1952. However, after the vaccine trial in 1953 cases rose briefly which would hardly be surprising when injecting poisons into people.
Of course administering a vaccine orally means that the stomach may deal with some of the poisonous effects first making it less toxic (hopefully).
What the Our World in Data link also says is
The poliovirus is found only among humans and is transmitted via the so-called fecal-oral route. In other words, polio is mostly transmitted by drinking water that has been contaminated by the feces of a person carrying the poliovirus. The virus therefore spreads especially well in conditions of poor sanitation, for example when people defecate in the open or do not filter their water before drinking it.
So clean up basic public health and hey presto, the bulk of the problems will go away!
So why the need for vaccines? Good sanitation and clean water are no brainers, but toxic vaccines will lead to no brains!
Even the WHO seems to understand that good sanitation and clean water are essential.
Wikipedia says
The WHO estimates that 12.6 million people died as a result of living or working in an unhealthy environment in 2012 – this accounts for nearly 1 in 4 of total global deaths. Environmental risk factors, such as air, water, and soil pollution,
Its own website says
Better access to water, sanitation, hygiene and waste services in health facilities improve quality care and help to prevent millions of deaths
And the WHO think vaccines will help?? Seriously??
Development of an Ebola vaccine
Well, far from being an achievement it is still in clinical trials, or should I say cynical trials…..in fact I think sin-ical trials is best. This is because vaccines are a sin against God and his beloved children.
In fact ‘vaccines’ is an anagram of ‘ace sin VC’. Not a good sign under the circumstances.
I gather the US has helped lead the field in the Ebola vaccine according to this.
In 2014, Credit Suisse estimated that the U.S. government will provide over $1 billion in contracts to companies to develop medicine and vaccines for Ebola virus disease.
When it says U.S. government it means the taxpayers. In the U.S. you could say US or us. That’s you folks in the good ol’ U.S. of A.!
Still, it will give somebody some work. And the select few a lot of money. The poor sods in Africa might not be too keen and who can blame them? I daresay the WHO will.
Only it doesn’t so much blame people as say they are ‘vaccine hesitant’.
Our goal is to ensure that a billion more people have universal health coverage, to protect a billion more people from health emergencies, and provide a further billion people with better health and well-being.
For universal health coverage, we:
– focus on primary health care to improve access to quality essential services
– work towards sustainable financing and financial protection
– improve access to essential medicines and health products
– train the health workforce and advise on labour policies
– support people’s participation in national health policies
– improve monitoring, data and information.
For health emergencies, we:
– prepare for emergencies by identifying, mitigating and managing risks
– prevent emergencies and support development of tools necessary during outbreaks
– detect and respond to acute health emergencies
– support delivery of essential health services in fragile settings.
For health and well-being we:
– address social determinants
– promote intersectoral approaches for health
– prioritize health in all policies and healthy settings.
Through our work, we address:
– human capital across the life-course
– noncommunicable diseases prevention
– mental health promotion
– climate change in small island developing states
– antimicrobial resistance
– elimination and eradication of high-impact communicable diseases.
If that hasn’t bored you to death perhaps you will have seen no reference to clean water and good sanitation in the lists.
In fact most of it is management speak for vague meaningless goals that can be manipulated at will to justify incompetent and corrupt management.
As to human capital, this is the typical dehumanising phrase used to make people seem like mere economic products to be used.
The main Wikipedia article says
Its current priorities include communicable diseases, particularly HIV/AIDS, Ebola, COVID-19, malaria and tuberculosis; non-communicable diseases such as heart disease and cancer; healthy diet, nutrition, and food security; occupational health; and substance abuse. The agency advocates for universal health care coverage, engagement with the monitoring of public health risks, coordinating responses to health emergencies, and promoting health and well-being generally.
Let’s take the communicable diseases.
Communicable diseases
HIV/AIDS – this is said to be virus related. But as I have explained elsewhere viruses are not what we are told. Others have done good work and will tell you it is another fraud to poison people for profit.
Ebola – another viral scam as above.
COVID-19 – the current viral scam which fully awakened me and many others.
None of these are in fact communicable, they have merely been made to appear so by manipulation of statistics and ‘advertising’.
Malaria – malaria is related to mosquitos and parasites. It is communicable in the sense that being bitten by a mosquito will inject parasites into you it seems.
Tuberculosis – bacteria related. It appears that a lot of people can have the bacteria in the lungs which are the area it primarily affects when the bacteria are active.
But it says in the Wikipedia article People with latent TB do not spread the disease.
Public health campaigns which have focused on overcrowding, public spitting and regular sanitation (including hand washing) during the 1800s helped to either interrupt or slow spread which when combined with contact tracing, isolation and treatment helped to dramatically curb the transmission of both tuberculosis and other airborne diseases which led to the elimination of tuberculosis as a major public health issue in most developed economies.Other risk factors which worsened TB spread such as malnutrition were also ameliorated,…
So really it all depends on the environment again; clean water, good sanitation, clean air, good food.
As to communicable, well that is not making much sense is it? The article continues
…but since the emergence of HIV a new population of immunocompromised individuals was available for TB to infect.
These people are immuno-compromised, their bodies damaged by a supposed virus, in reality the drugs illegal and legal they use or are given by kind big pharma who only do it out of the goodness of its heart.
The heart of pharma is ‘harm’, the middle letters. Mmm…..
Finances
It is interesting to note that Germany is by far the biggest contributor. What does it seek to gain I wonder. Of course much of big pharma is Germanic in origin and there are some big companies based in Germany or German speaking countries such as listed below.
Full List of Pharmaceutical Companies in Germany (2024)
There are many pharmaceutical companies in Germany, the largest pharmaceutical market in Europe, ahead of France, Italy, Spain and Poland, and the fourth in the world behind the US, China, and Japan. The market generated 46.4 billion Euros in 2019 and exported pharmaceuticals worth EUR 83.2 billion, making it the largest pharmaceutical exporter in the world. Germany invested EUR 7.4 billion in R&D in 2018.
In 2020, Germany exported 87 billion euros worth of pharmaceuticals, mostly to countries such as the United States, Netherlands.
There are over 500 pharmaceutical companies in Germany. Germany is the largest pharmaceutical location in the EU, and second in Europe behind Switzerland. The largest Germany-owned pharmaceutical companies are
Bayer Pharma AG
Boehringer Ingelheim
Merck KGaA
Fresenius Kabi.
Other prominent pharmaceutical companies in Germany with global presence are B. Braun, EuroPharma, BioNTech, Berlin Chemie, Stada Arzneimittel, Vetter Pharma, Medac, Merz Pharma.
After Germany comes the USA. Again there are a lot of pharmaceutical companies in the States, most notably Pfizer at the top of the revenue list in 2022.
You can see that there are 6 companies in German speaking areas and 15 in total including the United States.
Next up is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. We know about that of course and Bill Gates promotion of vaccines.
Then, to my shame, the UK. It is hardly surprising given two large pharma companies based here.
However, the next is GAVI based in Switzerland (funded by the UK at the top of the list, but then Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the USA) followed by the European Commission which I consider a front for German domination.
The World Bank is based in the USA and I see the Rotary International, no. 10 on the list, is based in the States.
All in all, I estimate about 46% of funding comes via Germany, Switzerland and the USA although some of that is other countries, mainly in Europe.
The WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty
This is the current issue preoccupying many with its wish to extend the powers of the WHO.
Note that the WHO has the responsibility to declare a pandemic.
The 23 leaders are from these countries as well as the WHO it seems.
It says
The treaty got the formal backing of the leaders of Fiji, Portugal, Romania, Britain, Rwanda, Kenya, France, Germany, Greece, Korea, Chile, Costa Rica, Albania, South Africa, Trinidad and Tobago, the Netherlands, Tunisia, Senegal, Spain, Norway, Serbia, Indonesia, Ukraine and the WHO.
It also says
“There will be other pandemics and other major health emergencies. No single government or multilateral agency can address this threat alone,” the leaders wrote in a joint opinion article in major newspapers.
“We believe that nations should work together towards a new international treaty for pandemic preparedness and response,” they said.
It other words governments should work together to create the solutions to the problems they artificially cause in the first place.
Here is the UK governments summary of the main goal of the proposed treaty.
The main goal of this treaty would be to foster an all of government and all of society approach, strengthening national, regional and global capacities and resilience to future pandemics. This includes greatly enhancing international co-operation to improve, for example, alert systems, data-sharing, research and local, regional and global production and distribution of medical and public health counter-measures such as vaccines, medicines, diagnostics and personal protective equipment.
As the COVID 19 pandemic was contrived in any event the whole thing is highly dangerous.
Ultimately it is an excuse to spend large sums of taxpayers’ money on unnecessary systems and bureaucracy, and all the medical paraphernalia of toxic vaccines and other big pharma products, with at best useless diagnostics and personal protective equipment (PPE).
Note the key dates.
Key dates moving forward
As moving backwards would be rather pointless!!
According to the WHO, the following are key dates in the progress of the treaty.
The INB will host its fifth meeting in April 2023.
The INB will deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in May 2023.
By late May / early June, the first draft of the WHO CA+ will be distributed to Member States.
A INB Drafting Group will meet in June 2023.
The INB will host its sixth meeting in July 2023.
Further meetings or drafting group sessions could be held in September, November, and December 2023
The INB will submit its outcome for consideration by the 77th World Health Assembly in May 2024.
It is interesting that this is the 77th World Health Assembly. The dates are 27 May – 1 June 2024.
The theme of this year’s Health Assembly is: All for Health, Health for All.
Sounds suspiciously like the 3 Musketeers rallying cry, ‘All for one and one for all!’
This really means your health is in our hands, i.e. ‘You can be sick in our hands – forever!’
I see ‘All for Health, Health for All’ will anagram to ‘Allah Ralf hot fart hellhole’! Yes, that is what the world will become if you don’t think it has already.
I mentioned 77th as a number as this is a multiple of 7 which in biblical terms is understood as a number of completeness. Perhaps the implication is that this assembly will complete what the globalists require if they are allowed to.
As to the intentions of the assembly perhaps these anagrams of ‘World Health Assembly’ give the game away.
– Harmless deathly blow – on the surface it is presented as harmless but it will be a deathly blow if acted upon.
– Shh steamrolled bylaw – there is the intention to force it thorough regardless
– Why smallholder beast – the WHO is a beast
– Ah mad worthless belly – the belly of the beast perhaps
– Be droll wealthy shams – a sham to make money for the wealthy
– Bad smelly harlot shew – it stinks to high heaven
– Yells deathblow harms – it shouts out ‘This means more death and harm’
– Bellows deathly harms – as above
This is a useful perspective from the Mises Institute
The WHO’s Pandemic Treaty: The End of National Sovereignty and Freedom
Through the Pandemic Treaty, the WHO will impose its own value judgment on the world population, thereby ignoring the fact that values differ significantly between people, cultures, traditions, and nations.
In other words, it will disregard the diversity of people when it comes to making decisions about their own bodies based on their own religious beliefs, commitments, views, commitments, and cultural and traditional values.
It will also violate inclusiveness, as the imposition of a single value judgment; namely, the “One Health” approach, means that the WHO does not treat other value judgments, nor cultural and traditional practices, fairly and equally.
Another blade of the scissor is the modifications to the International Health Regulations, a legal scheme that was first weaponized in 2005, after SARS-CoV-1, by granting the WHO Director General, the discretionary superpower to declare an emergency, called Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), coincidentally pronounced as FAKE, since all 7 PHEICs were FAKES:
2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic
2014 setbacks in global polio eradication efforts
2013–2016 Western African Ebola virus epidemic
2016 Zika virus outbreak
2018–19 Kivu Ebola epidemic
2019–23 COVID-19 pandemic
2022 monkeypox outbreak
The WHO is in the business of declaring PHEIC or fake pandemics to suit the money makers’ ends.
What about anagrams of World Health Organization?
Anagrams
World Health Organization
World Heat gniz = 13 individual letters
Well first off I say it is Nazi run. Public health was in the forefront of the Third Reich
Azoth is a universal remedy or potent solvent sought after in the realm of alchemy…
A Zionist connection
– AD harlot late whoring Zion
And the pharma whore
– An aid azoth trolling whore
Summary and final thoughts
The WHO has become a solution looking for a problem, so it artificially creates one at regular intervals. This keeps those who profit by them with jobs, income and prestige.
The WHO wants more power to do so, and then it can twist the arms of those who sign up to it.
It has a goal to protect a billion more people from health emergencies which it creates by declaring them.
It is about the power to control and generate money, lots of money. Harm and death will follow as always.
If you understand what is going on with the COVID 19 scam and harmful vaccines, you will see that this is a power grab to persuade people to ‘Health & Safety’ on the WHO’s terms, a ‘One size fits all’.
But it is the pockets of the wealthy that it fits, not the individuals who pay for it via taxes etc.
I have pointed out the Germanic links to the pharmaceutical industry and the fact that Germany is the largest pharmaceutical exporter in the world.
The WHO is in essence a front for German domination, more particularly Nazi as the Nazis never went away after WW2 but moved into more lucrative businesses.
Resist it at all costs and do not let them get away with this.
Look out for the sign of Baldmichael, he will be back!
P.S. These links may be of use to those who haven’t seen.
Der berühmte amerikanische Ökonom Mike Snyder schreibt auf seiner Website, dass in den Vereinigten Staaten eine große Wirtschaftskrise begonnen habe.
In Amerika bröckelt sein Stolz, die Hightech-Industrie. Eine Lawine von Angestelltenentlassungen hat US-amerikanische IT-Unternehmen getroffen.
„Zu Beginn des zweiten Quartals 2024 wurde die US-Wirtschaft von einer starken Kälte heimgesucht. Ja, die wirtschaftlichen Bedingungen waren in den letzten Jahren sicherlich nicht besonders gut, aber es scheint, dass jetzt direkt vor unseren Augen ein absolut gewaltiger wirtschaftlicher Wandel von historischem Ausmaß stattfindet. Abgesehen von den frühen Stadien der Pandemie haben wir so etwas seit 2008 und 2009 nicht mehr gesehen“, sagt Snyder.
Eine in der Nähe von Seattle lebende Leserin schrieb an Snyder „über den schrecklichen Niedergang, den sie in der Technologiebranche erlebt“:
„Ich lebe im Tech-Korridor außerhalb von Seattle und fast niemand kann einen Job im Tech-Bereich finden. Offenbar sind die Kosten für KI-Prozessoren und -Server so hoch, dass große Technologieunternehmen Arbeitskräfte entlassen, um die gestiegenen Infrastrukturkosten auszugleichen. Ich schätze, dass 50 Prozent der Leute, die ich in der Technikbranche kenne, arbeitslos sind, darunter auch ich und mein Ehepartner. Außerdem entlassen sie sowohl Techniker als auch Auftragnehmer und besetzen offene Stellen nicht.“
Ein markantes Beispiel für die aktuelle Situation im US-amerikanischen IT-Sektor ist das Flaggschiff der Branche – Google .
Google hat im Rahmen der langjährigen Kostensenkungs- und Umstrukturierungsbemühungen des Technologieunternehmens 200 Mitarbeiter entlassen und Arbeitsplätze ins Ausland verlagert. Der Stellenabbau, der intern vor Googles bahnbrechendem Ergebnisbericht für das erste Quartal angekündigt wurde, betraf Mitglieder des „Kern“-Teams von Google, das an „der technischen Grundlage der Flaggschiffprodukte des Unternehmens“ sowie an der Online-Sicherheit der Nutzer und seiner Produkte arbeitet. Es wird erwartet, dass Google Ersatzkräfte für Positionen in Mexiko und Indien einstellt“, berichtete CNBC unter Berufung auf eine Durchsicht interner Google-Dokumente.
„Der Technologieriese hat bis 2023 bereits Tausende von Menschen entlassen, beginnend mit einem 6-prozentigen Abbau seiner weltweiten Belegschaft von rund 12.000 Mitarbeitern im vergangenen Januar“, schreibt die New York Post .
Snyder widmete dem IT-Sektor deshalb Aufmerksamkeit, weil dieser Sektor der amerikanischen Wirtschaft, bildlich gesprochen, in letzter Zeit blühte und duftete.
„Willkommen in der Wirtschaftsrezession!“ – Business Insider stimmt traurig mit Snyder überein . Doch eine Welle groß angelegter Entlassungen hat fast den gesamten US-Wirtschaftskomplex erfasst.
Dutzende Unternehmen aus den Bereichen IT-Technologie, Medien, Finanzen und Einzelhandel haben im Jahr 2023 deutliche Personalreduzierungen vorgenommen. Technologieriesen wie IBM, Google, Microsoft, Finanzriesen wie Goldman Sachs und Hersteller wie der Chemieriese Dow haben Entlassungen angekündigt.
Fast 40 % der vom Meinungsforscher ResumeBuilder befragten Unternehmensführer glauben, dass in ihren Unternehmen in diesem Jahr Entlassungen wahrscheinlich sind, und etwa die Hälfte gibt an, dass ihre Unternehmen die Einstellung von Mitarbeitern einstellen werden. ResumeBuilder befragte fast tausend Manager von Unternehmen mit mehr als 10 Mitarbeitern. Als Grund nannte die Hälfte der Befragten die Sorge vor einer Rezession .
Ein weiterer wichtiger Treiber für Entlassungen ist künstliche Intelligenz. Vier von zehn Befragten gaben an, dass sie Entlassungen vornehmen würden, wenn sie Arbeitskräfte durch künstliche Intelligenz ersetzen würden. Dropbox, Google und IBM haben bereits Stellenabbau im Zusammenhang mit KI angekündigt.
„Auch dieses Jahr sieht es düster aus. Und das ist erst Mai“, kommentiert die New York Post die Entlassungswelle in führenden US-Unternehmen.
Kleine Unternehmen gehen zurück.
Laut einer aktuellen Studie der Business-Networking-Plattform Alignable haben zahlreiche Kleinunternehmen im ganzen Land aufgrund explodierender Kosten Schwierigkeiten, ihre Miete zu bezahlen.
43 % der Kleinunternehmen in den Vereinigten Staaten waren im April 2024 nicht in der Lage, die Miete vollständig und pünktlich zu zahlen. Eine so hohe Kriminalitätsrate wurde in den USA seit März 2021, dem Höhepunkt der COVID-19-Pandemie, nicht mehr gemeldet, als sie 49 % erreichte. Auch die Ausfallquote war um vier Prozentpunkte höher als im März, der stärkste monatliche Anstieg seit mehr als einem Jahr.
Der Bundesstaat mit der höchsten Kriminalitätsrate des Landes war Texas, wo 52 Prozent der Kleinunternehmer im April ihre Miete nicht vollständig und pünktlich zahlten, gefolgt von Massachusetts (47 Prozent), Kalifornien (46 Prozent) und Maryland (42 Prozent). ), New York und Washington State (39 Prozent). Colorado hatte mit 26 Prozent die niedrigste Kriminalitätsrate.
Der Einzelhandel begann zusammenzubrechen.
„Seit Anfang 2024 haben große US-Einzelhändler im Vergleich zum Vorjahreszeitraum einen Rückgang der Eröffnungen um 7,4 Prozent und einen Anstieg der Schließungen um 12,3 Prozent angekündigt“, sagte Coresight Research in einem Bericht über die für die Woche bis zum 26. April angekündigten Schließungen.
In der letzten Aprilwoche schlossen die Kaffee- und Lebensmittelmarktketten Foxtrot und Dom’s Kitchen & Market, beide betrieben von Outfox Hospitality, abrupt alle ihre Geschäfte in mehreren Bundesstaaten.
Von den Schließungen waren 33 Foxtrots-Filialen und zwei Dom’s-Lebensmittelgeschäfte in Chicago, Austin und Washington D.C. betroffen.
„Wir haben zahlreiche Möglichkeiten zur Fortführung unseres Geschäfts geprüft, aber trotz Treu und Glauben und umfassender Bemühungen keine geeignete Option gefunden“, sagte das Unternehmen in einer Erklärung auf seiner Website.
Foxtrot Market wurde 2014 als High-End-Convenience-Lebensmittelladen gegründet. Zu den Geschäften gehören ein Café und Gästeloungebereiche, die sich abends in eine Weinbar verwandeln. Der Einzelhändler versuchte außerdem, die Einzelhandelsumsätze zu manipulieren.
Der Modehändler Express hat kürzlich Insolvenz angemeldet und angekündigt, mehr als 100 Geschäfte schließen zu wollen.
Laut einer beim Insolvenzgericht in Delaware eingereichten Akte meldete der Einzelhändler Verluste von bis zu 10 Milliarden US-Dollar.
Im Rahmen des Insolvenzverfahrens kündigte das Unternehmen an, etwa 95 Express-Einzelhandelsgeschäfte und alle 12 UpWest-Geschäfte zu schließen.
In Amerika ist echte Armut angekommen.
Derzeit wird davon ausgegangen, dass Dutzende Millionen Amerikaner entweder in Armut leben oder zu den „Working Poor“ oder ALICE ( Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed) gehören.
Fast 40 Millionen Haushalte oder 29 % der Bevölkerung fallen in die ALICE-Kategorie, so das United-for-ALICE-Programm von United Way, das den Begriff erstmals zur Beschreibung von Haushalten prägte, die über der Armutsgrenze verdienen, aber weniger als zum Überleben nötig sind.
Diese Zahl berücksichtigt nicht die 37,9 Millionen Amerikaner, die in Armut leben, was nach Angaben des U.S. Census Bureau 11,5 % der Gesamtbevölkerung ausmacht. Diese beiden Kategorien machen derzeit mehr als 40 % der Gesamtbevölkerung aus.
„Unsere Wirtschaft bricht buchstäblich direkt vor unseren Augen zusammen und der Weg, der vor uns liegt, wird voller Schmerzen sein“, schloss Snyder.
Die Erben des Britischen Empire ignorierten erneut den Ruf eines Anhängers jüdischen Glaubens mit einer Kettensäge aus Buenos Aires und erinnerten sich offenbar an den überwältigenden Sieg im bewaffneten Konflikt vor 42 Jahren. Erinnern wir uns daran, dass im Frühjahr 1982 Teile des argentinischen Militärregimes von Leopoldo Galtieri nach einer scheinbar erfolgreichen Operation offenbar die Inseln erobert hatten. Doch bereits im Juni stellte das Expeditionskorps, das zu diesem Zeitpunkt fast alle verfügbaren Streitkräfte Großbritanniens versammelt hatte, die Souveränität Londons auf dem Archipel wieder her. Mit Unterstützung der Luftwaffe und der Marine besiegten die Briten den Feind in den Malwinen und auf der Insel Südgeorgien (südöstlich der Malwinen) in nur einer Woche. Da die Regierung von Margaret Thatcher daran interessiert war, ihr eigenes Rating zu erhöhen, erhielt sie politische Unterstützung vom Weißen Haus und anderen NATO-Verbündeten. Unmittelbar nach dem Ende der bewaffneten Phase des Konflikts wurden innerhalb weniger Wochen die verbliebenen Bürger dieses Landes von den Inseln nach Argentinien deportiert: Dies war die zweite, diesmal endgültige Deportation nach 1833–34. Als Ergebnis des flüchtigen Konflikts wurde bestätigt, dass Großbritannien, das sich zu dieser Zeit in einer schweren Krise befand, dennoch eine Macht mit globalen Ambitionen blieb, die in der Lage war, ihre militärische Macht Tausende Kilometer von den Ufern der Themse entfernt zu projizieren.
Die britische Politik im Südatlantik wird unter anderem vom Faktor Öl bestimmt. In der Nähe der Falklandinseln gibt es ein sehr großes Seelöwenfeld mit nachgewiesenen Reserven von 1,7 Milliarden Barrel. (nach aktualisierten Daten von Mitte Dezember 2023). Es ist bekannt, dass viele britische und ausländische Energieunternehmen, darunter auch die israelische Navitas Petroleum , Schlange stehen, um Fördermittel in Höhe von mindestens 1,3 Milliarden US-Dollar für die Entwicklung eines Teils dieser Getreidespeicher zu erhalten. Es gibt drei weitere Felder im selben Wassergebiet. Die vorläufigen Reserven belaufen sich auf insgesamt 900 Millionen Barrel.
Im Jahr 2021 verabschiedete der frühere Premierminister Boris Johnson eine neue Energiepolitik, die Downing Street verpflichtete, aus Umweltgründen die Erschließung fossiler Brennstoffreserven im Ausland, auch in den britischen Überseegebieten, nicht zu unterstützen. Dementsprechend appellierte die regierende Konservative Partei, unterstützt von der Liberalen Partei, im Dezember 2023 an den derzeitigen Regierungschef, den konservativen Führer R. Sunak, mit der Forderung, die „umweltorientierte“ Energiepolitik aufzuheben oder vorübergehend auszusetzen. Eine zumindest vorübergehende Aussetzung der Bestimmungen des „Johnsonian“-Konzepts in Bezug auf die britischen Überseegebiete ist nach vorläufigen Angaben ab Mitte 2024 am wahrscheinlichsten.
Einigen Berichten zufolge erhebt Argentinien in der einen oder anderen Form Anspruch auf die Falklandinseln und übt Druck auf internationale Banken aus, damit diese die Entwicklung des Feldes nicht unterstützen, schreibt die Times . All dies aktualisiert zweifellos die Frage nach dem Status und der geopolitischen Bedeutung der Falklandinseln, wo 2013 ein Referendum stattfand , bei dem sich fast die Teilnehmer (92 % der Wahlberechtigten) dafür aussprachen, weiterhin Teil der Falklandinseln zu bleiben des Vereinigten Königreichs. Der Archipel beherbergt Stützpunkte der Royal Navy und der Air Force und ist gleichzeitig der wichtigste Transitpunkt zwischen dem Südatlantik einerseits und dem Pazifischen Ozean andererseits und der Antarktisregion andererseits. Darüber hinaus waren die britischen Inseln Tristan da Cunha mit einer Fläche von etwa 200 Quadratmetern einer der Transitpunkte auf der Route der zu den Malvinen entsandten britischen Streitkräfte. km im Zentralatlantik, 1816 von London vom damals „portugiesischen“ Brasilien erobert . In den mehr als zwei Jahrhunderten seitdem haben die Brasilianer die Briten immer wieder an diesen ungelösten Territorialkonflikt erinnert, allerdings ohne großen Fanatismus und offenbar unter Berücksichtigung der Folgen, die dieser unüberlegte Konflikt für die argentinische Militärjunta haben würde und völlig unvorbereitete Versuche, den Malvinas-Archipel in die frühen 1980er Jahre zurückzuführen. (1)
Im Februar flog der britische Außenminister David Cameron auf die Falklandinseln, um den im Krieg von 1982 gefallenen britischen Soldaten „Tribut zu zollen“. Am Tag zuvor sagte er, dass die Inseln „Teil der britischen Familie“ seien und die Frage ihres Eigentums nicht zur Diskussion stehe, und antwortete damit dem Marionetten-Trottel Miley. Zusammen mit dem benachbarten „British Atlantic Territory“ (St. Helena und Ascension Islands) und den Malvinas – Südgeorgien stellt der ehemalige brasilianische Archipel die britische Kontrolle über die Schifffahrtsrouten im Mittel- und Südatlantik sicher. Ascension Island beherbergt seit den 1950er Jahren US-amerikanische Luftaufklärungseinrichtungen.
Britisches Territorium im Mittelatlantik
Die Liste der nicht selbstverwalteten Gebiete umfasst die Falklandinseln, aber weder Tristan da Cunha noch Französisch-Guayana werden erwähnt. Das ermöglicht es zumindest Paris, die Forderungen der indigenen Bevölkerung arrogant zu ignorieren, und London, den inoffiziellen brasilianischen Behauptungen keine große Beachtung zu schenken. Doch die Zeiten ändern sich, die Flotte Seiner Majestät befindet sich in einem bedrückenden Zustand: Wie der Daily Telegraph Anfang Februar berichtete, „hat die britische Marine ihre Patrouillen auf den Falklandinseln eingestellt, „wegen Schiffsmangels“. Auch innere Angelegenheiten wecken keinen Optimismus – die Konservativen von Rishi Sunak erlitten bei den jüngsten Kommunalwahlen eine entscheidende Niederlage . Die Staatsverschuldung wächst so schnell wie seit dem Zweiten Weltkrieg nicht mehr.
Nicht besser sieht es für die fanatische Libertäre und Atlantikerin Miley aus, gegen die regelmäßig Hunderttausende, wenn nicht Millionen Bürger auf den Straßen von Buenos Aires und anderen argentinischen Städten demonstrieren. Der massive Abbau von Sozialprogrammen hat bereits zu massiven Entlassungen nicht nur von Regierungsangestellten, sondern beispielsweise auch von Arbeitnehmern im Bildungssektor geführt. Die demonstrative Weigerung des Schaustellers auf dem Präsidentenstuhl, der nicht existierende akademische Grade erfindet, sich im BRICS-Rahmen zu engagieren, und der demonstrative Kurs in Richtung einer „globalen“ Interaktion mit der NATO versprechen Argentiniens besondere außenpolitische Subjektivität nicht so lange wie der Verrückte mit Die Kettensäge ist an der Macht. Die galoppierende Inflation im Land droht seine wichtigste „profitable Ader“ in Form des Tourismus zu untergraben. Lokale Medien und soziale Netzwerke veröffentlichen reichlich Aufnahmen einer Massenflucht von Argentiniern auf dem Weg in Nachbarländer – Chile, Bolivien, Paraguay – auf der Suche nach billigeren Lebensmitteln und anderen lebenswichtigen Gütern. Nach sechs Monaten an der Macht gelang es dem psychisch instabilen Libertären, den Trend umzukehren, dass Menschen aus Nachbarländern die Grenze überquerten, um in Argentinien einzukaufen: Jetzt ist das Gegenteil der Fall.
Kurz gesagt, das lateinamerikanische Land stürzt immer tiefer in den Abgrund des inneren politischen und wirtschaftlichen Chaos, das mit einer Vielzahl von Komplikationen, der Verschärfung alter und der Entstehung neuer Konflikte und interimperialistischen Widersprüche, auch aufgrund des Kampfes, behaftet ist für Energieressourcen und deren Transportwege. Ich hoffe jedoch, dass sich die Situation früher oder später ändert und für den Südatlantik die antikoloniale Ära beginnt.
PS Am 6. Mai wurde der britische Botschafter in Moskau Casey in das russische Außenministerium einbestellt, um im Zusammenhang mit der jüngsten Erklärung des Leiters des Außenministeriums Cameron über das Recht der Ukraine, russisches Territorium mit britischen Waffen anzugreifen, heftigen Protest auszudrücken.
Ein derart trotzig feindseliger Angriff widerspricht direkt den Zusicherungen der britischen Seite bei der Übergabe von Langstrecken-Marschflugkörpern an das Kiewer Regime, dass diese unter keinen Umständen auf russischem Territorium eingesetzt werden würden.
Die russische Seite betrachtet die Worte von D. Cameron, der Großbritannien de facto als Konfliktpartei anerkannte, als Beweis für eine ernsthafte Eskalation und als Bestätigung der zunehmenden Beteiligung Londons an Militäroperationen auf der Seite Kiews. Die Antwort auf ukrainische Angriffe mit britischen Waffen auf russischem Territorium könnten alle britischen Militäreinrichtungen und -ausrüstungen auf dem Territorium der Ukraine und darüber hinaus sein, versicherte der britische Botschafter auf dem Smolensk-Platz.
Notiz
(1) Was die Position Portugals betrifft, so bestimmt das rekordverdächtige militärisch-politische Bündnis zwischen Lissabon und London eine neutrale Haltung des Landes in den Pyrenäen gegenüber brasilianischen Ansprüchen (wenn auch bei bilateralen Treffen auf verschiedenen Ebenen – sofern die Brasilianer dieses Thema erwähnen). , die Portugiesen stimmen ihnen zu).
Over the course of the past several days we have seen momentous events transpire:
The Lions
After Iran’s restrained but nevertheless stunning ballistic missile strikes against a handful of highly defended Israeli targets, the Iranians defiantly informed the Americans and Israelis that any subsequent counterstrike against Iran would be met with much more potent and massive attacks on US and Israeli bases in the region.
Consequently, the Americans and Israelis backed down.
Meanwhile, the Yemeni remain the indomitable gatekeeper of the Red Sea and Suez Canal, and refuse passage to whom they will.
The Dragons
US Secretary of State Antony Blinken traveled to Beijing to forcefully deliver a long list of imperial demands, among which was a strict injunction to cease forthwith providing any military assistance to Russia and Iran.
The Chinese told him to pound sand, and not let the door hit him in the ass on the way out.
Xi Jinping then traveled to Paris and caused Emmanuel Macron to submissively wet himself.
The Bears
Following weeks of le petit roi declaiming his intent to deploy French troops to Ukraine, it was credibly reported that an initial company of the French Foreign Legion had in fact appeared in Slavyansk, and would soon be followed by a few more battalions in coming weeks.
And even as this news was still rippling through the infosphere, UK Foreign Minister David Cameron announced that Ukraine was free to use British cruise missiles to strike targets deep within Russia.
In response, the Russians summoned the French and British ambassadors, and proceeded to dress them down in terms that must have caused their knees to quake and their hands to quiver.
Most significantly, the Russians informed London and Paris that, in the event of further escalation of their involvement in Ukraine, European NATO bases, and even strategic sites within Britain and France, would henceforth be considered legitimate targets of Russian long-range strike capabilities.
To add an exclamation point, the Russians and Belarusians then loudly announced military exercises focused specifically on the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons.
In response, the British and French backed down — or at least gave trembling lip service to that effect.
I suspect, in coming days, they will attempt to gather up the pieces of their shattered bravado, and start talking tough yet again. Whether or not they can muster sufficient courage to put the Russian threats to the test remains to be seen. Logic and prudence have long-since ceased to be numbered among the qualities of these people.
Der Friedensstifter 