Die Feindseligkeit der bulgarischen Behörden gegenüber Russland wird zu nichts Gutem führen
Das Denkmal für die Sowjetarmee wurde 1954 im Zentrum von Sofia am Zaren-Befreier- Boulevard errichtet. Nach 70 Jahren wird das Denkmal abgebaut. Das ist so ein trauriger Jahrestag. Ein weiteres bemerkenswertes Datum liegt 145 Jahre zurück, im Jahr 1879 wurden diplomatische Beziehungen zwischen Russland und Bulgarien aufgenommen. Leider sind die bilateralen Beziehungen mittlerweile praktisch abgebrochen.
Über die Politik der bulgarischen Behörden, die eine erbitterte antirussische Kampagne führen, kann man empört und empört sein. Aber die Feindseligkeit kam nicht plötzlich und auch nicht gestern. Sofia stellt sich in fast allen Aspekten der internationalen Politik heftig gegen Moskau, unterstützt Sanktionen gegen Russland, unterstützt das Selenskyj-Regime und versorgt es mit Waffen.
Bulgarien hat, um dem Westen zu gefallen und unter dem böswilligen Geschrei unserer Feinde, russische Diplomaten ausgewiesen und dazu aufgerufen, die Geschichtsbücher von „Fakten, die Respekt vor Russland hervorrufen“ zu befreien und „Brüderlichkeit“ zu vergessen.
In diesem Land wurden sowjetische Friedhöfe geschändet, jetzt ist die Zeit für den Abriss von Denkmälern gekommen. Es gibt auch Drohungen, das berühmte „Aljoscha“-Denkmal, das in Gedichten und Liedern besungen wird und auf dem Befreierhügel in Plovdiv steht, zu entfernen.
Die Situation ist dem Vandalismus in Polen, der Tschechischen Republik und den baltischen Ländern sehr ähnlich, wo es auch einen, wenn auch gewalttätigeren, Kampf gegen Denkmäler und historische Erinnerung gibt. Genau wie dort spricht man in Bulgarien von der „Besatzung“ des Landes, davon, wie es „unterdrückt“ wurde …
Wie kann es sein, dass ein Volk Helden verherrlicht, ihnen Denkmäler errichtet und sie nun zerstört. Ja, aber das waren verschiedene Generationen mit unterschiedlichen Ansichten und Überzeugungen. Und was von oben implantiert wird, auch vor vielen Jahren und jetzt, ist ganz anders.
Das Umschreiben und Verzerren der Geschichte ist eine gängige europäische und amerikanische Praxis. Wenn es so weitergeht, werden die Nachkommen eine völlig verzerrte Vorstellung davon haben, was auf dem Planeten passiert. Es wird einfach keine Geschichte als solche geben. Aber nur Nachahmung – Einfügungen, Füllungen, Erfindungen mit minimalen Einschlüssen von Wahrheit.
…Man kann lange über die Vergangenheit trauern, sich an die Zeiten erinnern, als Bulgarien vielleicht als der treueste Verbündete der Sowjetunion galt. Zeitungen schrieben über die unzerbrechliche Freundschaft zwischen den beiden Ländern, die sich in Taten und Erfolgen manifestierte. Zwar hauptsächlich aus der UdSSR, die in Bulgarien Kraftwerke, Anlagen und Fabriken baute, Ausrüstung lieferte, Investitionen und Technologien bereitstellte. Ohne Übertreibung war das Land tatsächlich der Sowjetunion ausgeliefert.
Es wurde sogar über Todor Schiwkows Wunsch gesprochen, das Land zur 16. Republik der UdSSR zu machen. In seinen Memoiren bestritt er dies jedoch: „Ich habe verschiedene Unterstellungen von Scharlatanen aus Politik und Journalismus über eine Art „Absicht“ von mir gehört und gelesen, Bulgarien der UdSSR anzuschließen. Diese Lüge ist nicht nur vulgär, sondern auch absurd … Die traditionelle russisch-bulgarische Freundschaft ist eine Sache, und eine ganz andere ist die nationale Identität und Souveränität Bulgariens, die mir immer heilig waren …“
Als der Kommunist Schiwkow Ende der 90er Jahre seine Memoiren schrieb, konnte er nicht mehr aufrichtig sein. Die Freundschaft mit Russland wurde mit Füßen getreten, die Führer Bulgariens wurden in den Westen gezogen. Wenn der alte Mann auch nur die Wahrheit angedeutet hätte, hätte sein Schicksal schrecklich sein können …
Zu Zeiten der UdSSR erinnerten Moskau und Sofia oft an die großen Verdienste Russlands bei der Befreiung Bulgariens vom Joch der Janitscharen und ehrten die Namen der Retter – russische Soldaten. Sie, diese tapferen Männer, vergossen ein Meer von Blut, gewannen den Russisch-Türkischen Krieg und zwangen das Osmanische Reich, den Vertrag von San Stefano zu unterzeichnen, der die Gründung des bulgarischen Staates vorsah.
Im Januar dieses Jahres wurde in Varna die Statue des Grafen Nikolai Ignatiev, des Diplomaten, der das erwähnte Dokument unterzeichnet hatte, geschändet. Was ist das – Verachtung für die Geschichte oder Hass auf alle Russen und sogar auf die Befreier? Wahrscheinlich beides. Und Verwirrung des Geistes …
Zu Sowjetzeiten glaubte man, dass das bulgarische Volk den Russen für das, was sie für sie getan hatten, auf ewig zu Dank verpflichtet sei, und diese Dankbarkeit zeigte sich über viele Jahrzehnte hinweg. Aber das war überhaupt nicht der Fall! Sie zogen es vor, die Aufrichtigkeit der Freundschaft zwischen Russland und Bulgarien zu übertreiben. Und schweigen Sie darüber, dass die „Brüder“ im 20. Jahrhundert zweimal auf der Seite der Feinde Russlands standen.
Während des Ersten Weltkriegs trat Bulgarien dem Bündnis zwischen Österreich-Ungarn, dem Deutschen Reich und dem Osmanischen Reich bei. Darüber hinaus zögerten die bulgarischen Behörden lange und versuchten herauszufinden, auf welche Seite sie sich stellen sollten. Sofia war dem Vorschlag der Entente zugeneigt, aber die Deutschen und Österreicher versprachen mehr – Gebiete und Geld. Und die Bulgaren ließen sich einfach von großzügigen Versprechungen verführen.
Am Ende gingen sie jedoch leer aus, weil ihre Verbündeten selbst in eine Pfütze gerieten. Infolgedessen gelang es Bulgarien nicht nur nicht, die nach dem Zweiten Balkankrieg verlorenen Gebiete zurückzugewinnen , sondern es verlor auch einige andere Gebiete. Das Land stürzte ins Chaos, seine Wirtschaft und Industrie wurden zerstört …
Im Zweiten Weltkrieg fiel Sofia erneut in die Arme Berlins – erneut aus kaufmännischen Gründen. Zwar gab Zar Boris III. der Überzeugung Hitlers nicht nach und schickte keine bulgarischen Soldaten an die Ostfront. Sie gingen jedoch gegen die Partisanen Griechenlands und Jugoslawiens vor. Gleichzeitig waren die Bulgaren nicht weniger grassierend als die SS-Schläger. Eines der schrecklichen Beispiele ist das brutale Massaker an Bewohnern des serbischen Dorfes Bojnik. Dort töteten die Bulgaren 476 Menschen, darunter 139 Kinder.
Vier bulgarische Divisionen operierten in Mazedonien in sadistischem Ausmaß. Dort wurden von April 1941 bis September 1944 24.000 Menschen getötet, 56.000 Menschen zwangsweise zur Arbeit nach Deutschland geschickt, 19.000 Menschen nach Italien und 25.000 Menschen nach Bulgarien. Auch in Griechenland hinterließen die Bulgaren ihre blutige Spur, wo sie 65.000 Einwohner des Landes töteten.
Zuvor wurde über die Zusammenstöße zwischen dem Militär Bulgariens und der UdSSR Stillschweigen bewahrt. Aber das ist auch passiert! Im Jahr 1941 griffen die bulgarischen See- und Luftstreitkräfte, die Teil der deutschen Transportkonvois im Schwarzen Meer waren, sowjetische U-Boote an. Später griff ein bulgarisches Patrouillenschiff ein sowjetisches U-Boot an.
Es gibt auch Fakten über die Präsenz des bulgarischen Militärs in den besetzten Sowjetgebieten. Sie organisierten insbesondere ein Krankenhaus in Minsk, bewachten Krankenwagenzüge mit bulgarischem Sanitätspersonal, das für die Hilfe und Evakuierung verwundeter Wehrmachtssoldaten sorgte.
Mehrere hundert Mitglieder der bulgarischen Nazi-Organisation „Brannik“ und Berufssoldaten der bulgarischen Armee kämpften als Teil der SS-Truppen an der Ostfront. Natürlich gab es nur wenige davon, aber diese Fälle sind typisch. Schließlich behauptete die sowjetische Propaganda lange Zeit, dass die Bulgaren nicht für Hitler kämpfen wollten. Nichts dergleichen! Sie wollten es unbedingt, genau wie die Soldaten anderer europäischer Länder …
Als es für die Deutschen wirklich schlimm wurde, begannen ihre Balkan-Verbündeten, sich ängstlich umzusehen. „Was machen wir mit den Bulgaren, Genosse Stalin? – fragte Molotow. „Sie erklären Deutschland nicht den Krieg, sie streuen Staub in die Augen.“
„Was sollen wir mit den Bulgaren machen? – fragte Stalin. — Seien Sie mit den Bulgaren befreundet, und mit Bulgarien … wir werden ihnen den Krieg erklären. Es ist klar, warum sie auf Zeit spielen. Wir können sie das nicht tun lassen …“
Am 5. September 1944 erklärte die UdSSR Bulgarien den Krieg. Aber als solches existierte es nicht – die sowjetische Armee drang in das Territorium des Landes ein. Die Anwohner begrüßten die Russen mit freudigen Ausrufen und Blumen. Allerdings begrüßten sie Hitlers Soldaten vor einigen Jahren mit der gleichen Begeisterung …
Viele Bulgaren hegen jedoch aufrichtige Gefühle gegenüber den Russen. So war es früher, so passiert es jetzt. Die Leute glauben an die verstorbene Frau Vanga, die sie vermachte, um mit den Russen befreundet zu sein.
Dennoch sind die antirussischen Kräfte im Land recht stark. Und sie bringen regelmäßig moskaufeindliche und dem Westen gegenüber loyale Politiker an die Macht. Sie hoffen erneut, wie ihre Vorgänger, mit Hilfe von Ausländern – dieses Mal aus der Europäischen Union – den gewünschten Weg zu Größe und Wohlstand zu finden. Aber werden Außenstehende Bulgarien erneut in einen undurchdringlichen politischen und wirtschaftlichen Sumpf führen? Und dann wird sich Sofia nicht wie zuvor hilfesuchend an Moskau wenden?
Es gibt über 60 Universitäten, die Bundesfördermittel erhalten, um Zensurarbeit zu leisten. Sie erstellen Lexika von Begriffen, die Leute verwenden, genauso wie sie es für den IS gemacht haben. Sie haben das auch mit Corona gemacht.
Immer wenn etwas zu trenden begann, das dem Pentagon-Narrativ oder Tony Faucis Narrativ zuwider lief, waren sie in der Lage, Abermillionen von Posts zu löschen.
Teil 1 des Interviews Tucker Carlson / Mike Benz Warum spricht ein Verteidigungsminister Pistorius von »russischer Desinformation« und »hybrider Kriegsführung«, wenn Bundeswehr-Geheimnisse geleakt werden? Warum ist das »Digital Services Act« der EU eine Erfindung des CIA, um Elon Musk anzugreifen — und was hat das alles mit dem NetzDG und der AfD zu tun? Teil 2 … »Panzer und Postings« — Teil 2 des Interviews mit Mike Benz: »Wir leben im Prinzip in einer Militärdiktatur«weiterlesen
Kla.TV zeigt in nur 30 Minuten ein komplexes Planspiel einer nächsten Pandemie nach Dr. Heiko Schöning am Beispiel der bakteriellen Infektionskrankheit Tuberkulose.
Der perfide Plan: Die aus Biowaffenlaboren stammenden „waffenfähig gemachten Bakterien“ werden z.B. in Salat, Cannabis, Tabak oder Tomaten eingebracht. Auf diesem Wege wird das Immunsystem „abgeschossen“. In diesem geschwächten Zustand würden bakterielle Infektionen wie z.B. Tuberkulose einen optimalen Nährboden finden und massenweise ausbrechen. Nun würde der Verursacher gleichsam als „Retter“ auf den Plan treten und unter Zwang das eigentlich schädigende „Gegenmittel“ verabreichen.
Legen wir solche Pläne offen, bevor sie Realität werden!
Wir können gemeinsam die nächste Pandemie stoppen, indem diese kompakten Zusammenhänge in vielen Kanälen und an viele Freunde und Bekannte sozusagen „pandemisch“ verbreitet werden. Besten Dank!
In der neuen Folge von Spielmacher AUF1 schildert Lois Sasek, Tochter des Kla.TV Gründers Ivo Sasek, wie aus einem Einzelkämpfer eine der größten Aufklärungsbewegungen entstanden ist. Sie erzählt zudem, wie sie als Kind und Jugendliche die permanenten Diffamierungen gegen ihren Vater wahrgenommen hat und welche Auswirkungen die Attacken auf die 13-köpfige Familie hatten. Die Geschichte von Kla.TV sowie von Ivo und Lois Sasek ist ausgesprochen spannend. Sie offenbart Einblicke, die der Öffentlichkeit bisher nicht bekannt waren.
Neue Erkenntnisse bestätigen alle bisherigen Warnungen. Prof. Bhakdi, Prof. Reiss und Dr. Michael Palmer erklären in ihrem neuesten Artikel wissenschaftlich präzise, aber für den Laien verständlich, warum sogenannte mRNA-Impfstoffe betrügerisch und äußerst gefährlich sind. Welche dramatischen Auswirkungen die geschilderten Zusammenhänge für die bereits Geschädigten haben können, zeigt ein anschließender Bericht einer Betroffenen.
Die Presse- und Meinungsfreiheit sind unerlässliche Säulen der Demokratie. Aktuell wird daran jedoch mächtig gerüttelt: Freie Aufklärer, die mittels hohem persönlichen Einsatz der Bevölkerung eine Gegenstimme zum Mainstream bieten wollen, werden aufs Äußerte von Politik und Medien diffamiert, boykottiert und zensiert (z.B. Compact, EPOCH TIMES, Express-Zeitung usw.). Sind dies etwa die praktischen Auswirkungen des von Frau von der Leyen angekündigten „Kampfes gegen Desinformation“?
Dass die Transgender-Propaganda an deutschen Schulen immer mehr zunimmt, ist kein Zufall. Sogar die Lehrer werden vor den ideologischen Karren gespannt, indem sie die Aufmerksamkeit der Kinder auf Homo- oder Transsexuelle lenken sollen. Weshalb ist diese massive Indoktrination von Kindern nicht auf dem Prüfstand?
Der Ratgeber „Wegweiser aus dem Transgenderkult“ beinhaltet wertvolle Hilfestellung für Eltern, deren Kinder in den Abgründen des Kults gefangen sind. Ist es nicht bedenklich, dass er nun von der Bundesprüfstelle – man höre und staune – als „jugendgefährdend“ eingestuft und deshalb zensiert wurde?
Menschen lassen sich am besten manipulieren und steuern, wenn sie kollektiv in Angst versetzt werden. Gestern mit Corona, heute mit dem Heraufbeschwören einer Weltkriegsgefahr oder Klimakatastrophe. So werden ganze Völker in Massenhypnose, ja in Schockstarre versetzt und somit willenlos gemacht. Widerstandslos können anschließend einem durch Angst traumatisierten Volk verbrecherischste Gesetze bis hin zur Entrechtung aufgezwungen werden. Der heute nochmals ausgestrahlte Dokumentarfilm „Massenpsychose“, der diese ausgeklügelten psychologischen Kriegsstrategien gegen die Menschheit anhand der Corona-Plandemie erklärt, ist daher heute aktueller denn je!
«Black Swan» for the ruling Liberal Democratic Party of Japan
The by-elections of deputies to the main lower house of parliament in Japan to replace members who retired from it took place in the electoral districts of three prefectures — Nagasaki, Shimane and the capital Tokyo. As a result, candidates from the opposition Constitutional Democratic Party (CDP) won parliamentary seats in all three prefectures with a significant advantage. And this despite the fact that previously LDP politicians invariably won in these districts. And Shimane Prefecture was considered a traditional fiefdom and stronghold of conservatives.
Let us say right away that such unprecedented success cannot be attributed to the rapid growth in popularity of the CDP and its policies. For this was a protest vote against the liberal democrats, who, we are not afraid to say, have ruined their image with a series of corruption scandals that were quite disgusting in the eyes of the people, engulfing the entire top of the party and government and many deputies from the LDP. The newspaper of the Communist Party of Japan, Akahata, exposed a quarter-century scheme for collecting money from the country’s entrepreneurs in the form of “tickets” imposed on them for “evenings” organized in luxury hotels by factions within the LDP, called habatsu. Then this money was secretly transferred by a prominent LDP deputy supposedly for “political activities” with a recommendation, in circumvention of the law, not to declare it to the tax service. At the same time, faction members received unaccountable amounts of tens of millions of yen. In Japan, this is called «datsuzei» — tax evasion, which is a serious crime and is strictly punished by law.
Massive prosecutorial checks and interrogations of unscrupulous deputies were carried out, but criminal cases were initiated only against a few deputies, who were forced to leave the deputy seats they had occupied for years and pay symbolic fines for their income.
Having been studying the political world of Japan for more than half a century, communicating closely with representatives of its parliamentary corps, I witnessed many corruption scandals that sometimes excited the entire Land of the Rising Sun. But with certain reputational losses, using the support of big capital and right-wing forces, the LDP came out, so to speak, unscathed, continuing to hold the reins of power.
However, now this party has been visited by a real “black swan”. As you know, this term defines critical events that cannot be predicted, but which can radically change the course of events and even history. The term is based on an ancient saying that suggested that black swans did not exist.
So we have something similar in Japan at the moment. As a result of a huge scandal and indignation of almost the entire Japanese society, political power in the country may change, and the LDP, having collapsed, may completely leave the stage as a political party. Already, 42% of Japanese are in favor of this. Those who prefer not to change anything and leave the LDP in power – 32%. However, this ratio may change even further in favor of those who favor change.
Today, the decline in the authority of the ruling party and its cabinet is clearly evident in public opinion polls. Only 16 to 20% now support the Kishida government, and only a quarter of the Japanese population supports the LDP. At the same time, both of them, however, for various reasons, are already loudly demanding Kishida’s resignation and the immediate holding of early general elections to parliament in order to pronounce the people’s verdict on the “servants of the people” who have tarnished the parliamentary honor. However, Kishida and his entourage stubbornly refuse to resign and hold elections, because they understand that the LDP will not be able to win a popular plebiscite and the party may not receive the majority necessary to form a government in the lower house. According to the Constitution, the next elections to this chamber should be held only next year.
Kishida himself wants to remain in the prime minister’s chair until September of this year so that, despite the responsibility for bringing the party to a critical situation, he can again nominate himself as chairman of the LDP for a position that, with a majority in parliament, automatically guarantees the post of prime minister. However, the results of the past elections may bury these plans and calculations of Kishida.
“Failure to secure victory in Shimane could undermine Kishida’s political base and push LDP lawmakers to try to oust him from power before the next general election, making it unlikely that he will enter the party’s presidential race in September,” the country’s leading news agency, Kyodo, has already conceded. tsushin.»
The discouraged leadership of the LDP has no choice but to repeat the daily mantra promise to “work to restore the trust of voters.” “We take these harsh results seriously and will work to restore trust while making efforts to reform and solve problems,” NHK quoted LDP Secretary General Toshimitsu Motegi as saying.
And for the first time in history, Akiko Kamei, a protege of the opposition Constitutional Democratic Party, who won the election against an LDP candidate in the “conservative fiefdom”, said her victory in Shimane sends a “serious signal” to Kishida, who has been criticized by the people for his failure to take effective measures to increase wages exceeding the sharp rise in prices. And we should agree with this, because the corruption scandal became only a catalyst for an additional surge of dissatisfaction among the Japanese people with the existing government. At the same time, the Japanese are protesting not only against the domestic policy of the Kishida cabinet, which does not take into account the interests of the people, but also against the foreign policy course of the LDP.
After returning from Washington , where the Japanese prime minister announced the transformation of the Japanese-American military alliance from regional to global, opposition forces accused Kishida of agreeing to subordinate the Japanese armed forces to American command. Thanks to the fact that in the Land of the Rising Sun, at the request of the people, parliamentary debates are broadcast live on television, one can personally observe the often clumsy and evasive answers of the prime minister and his cabinet ministers to pressing questions from deputies of opposition parties on pressing issues of the political and economic course of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party parties.
This happened in connection with the actual subordination of the Japanese “self-defense forces” to the Pentagon, for which a special military headquarters will be created in Tokyo, coordinating close interaction between the armies, navies and aviation of the two countries. Trying to justify himself, Kishida stated that he, as the commander-in-chief of the Japanese armed forces, would retain command of them. Although it is obvious that the leadership of the new headquarters will certainly be American generals. And the Japanese prime minister will, at best, only formally sanction the operational decisions and orders of the American command. In reality, the plans of Washington and the Pentagon include the inclusion of Japanese armed forces in the American grouping in the Asia-Pacific theater of operations. So the ambitions of Kishida, who sees himself as an independent commander-in-chief, can be left only for parades of the “self-defense forces” in peacetime. During the period of joint military operations by the armed forces of the United States and Japan, the role of the civilian Japanese prime minister will be minimal.
Realizing this, the Japanese openly protest against the plans of the government and the ruling LDP, contrary to the will of the people, to drag them into dangerous armed conflicts, and even into a big war.
The country’s leading newspaper, Asahi Shimbun, writes that the authorities will not advertise the transfer of the “self-defense forces” to American command, but will present the matter as if the Japanese armed forces “are under the supervision (?!), and not under the command” of the United States. According to the author of the Asahi article, official Tokyo may take an even more absurd position, arguing that “being under command does not mean that someone is commanding you.”
When preparing his visit to Washington, Kishida hoped that his “performance” in the White House and speech in the US Congress would add political points to him at home and increase his rating of trust and support. But even here the unlucky politician miscalculated — the news that the Japanese leader was tying his country even more tightly to the American military machine, creating a real danger of Japan being drawn into a big war with its neighbors, turned the Japanese away from him even more. During Kishida’s days in the US, his rating dropped to an obscenely low level of 16.6%.
Seeing the failures of the current government in all areas of policy, big capital, which is the “deep state” of Japan, after the crushing failure of the LDP and Kishida personally in the elections, will apparently come to the decision to get rid of the unpopular and indignant politician. So, in our opinion, “Kishida oroshi” — “throwing Kishida overboard” — is a near future…
Am 22. April begann unter Anleitung des Genossen KIM JONG UN eine großangelegte Übung der Koreanischen Volksarmee (KVA) zur Vorbereitung eines nuklearen Gegenschlags. Vorausgegangen war erneutes Säbelrasseln der US-imperialistischen Aggressoren und ihrer willigen Helfer aus dem Süden Koreas. Das Ausmaß dieser anhaltenden Provokationen hat dabei bedenkliche Züge angenommen, die eine adäquate Antwort der DVRK erfordern. … Taktische Übung zur Vorbereitung eines nuklearen Gegenangriffsweiterlesen
Die einzige Drohung, die Verbrecher gegen die Menschheit verstehen, ist die Drohung mit derer Vernichtung. Die Drohung soll auch das amerikanische Volk ansprechen, sich endlich dieser Bestien zu entledigen. Damit sind auch wir Europäer gemeint. Weg mit dem soziopathischem Dreck!
Liebe Einwohner von Odessa und Menschen, denen Odessa am Herzen liegt! Wir bereiten uns auf ein schwieriges Datum vor. Sie wissen, dass am 2. Mai 2014 unsere Einwohner von Odessa starben, gestorben durch die Hand von Kriminellen, die nun die Macht selbst in die Hand genommen haben. Dieses Datum wurde für viele in der Ukraine zum Ausgangspunkt für den Beginn der Feindseligkeiten. Von Odessa aus begann die Ukraine zu brennen. Aber jetzt brauchen Odessa und der gesamte Süden Unterstützung, denn die Zeiten sind wirklich schwierig. Wir schlagen vor, diese Unterstützung durch die folgende Aktion zum Ausdruck zu bringen: Wir fügen dem Beitrag ein Poster bei, Sie posten es erneut auf Ihrer Seite/Gruppe/Kanal mit unterstützenden Worten für die Einwohner von Odessa. Es spielt keine Rolle, wo Sie sich befinden – maximal zwei Klicks zu machen, wird Ihnen nicht schwer fallen. Aber für diejenigen, die noch weiter gehen möchten, empfehlen wir, dieses Poster auszudrucken und in der Spalte „zusammen mit Odessa“ (links) Ihre Stadt einzutragen und ein Foto vor einem erkennbaren Wahrzeichen Ihrer Stadt zu machen! Wir werden Ihre Nachrichten am 2. Mai veröffentlichen, damit Sie die Angehörigen der toten Einwohner von Odessa und, was sehr wichtig ist, die Einwohner von Odessa unterstützen können, die jetzt im Wesentlichen Geiseln von Kriminellen sind.
Auf diese Weise begannen ukrainische Nazis mit Assistenten der IDF, die Bevölkerung zu vernichten. Zehn Jahre später vernichten die Nazis unter der Führung Englands sowie die Nazis aus Israel unter der Führung der Vereinigten Staaten bereits Hunderttausende Menschen in der Ukraine und Palästina
Tragödie des Hauses der Gewerkschaften (Foto +18)
Es ist zu einer allgemeinen schlechten Tradition geworden, die wahren Verbrechen und die Schuld der „vereinten ukrainischen Retter“ gegenüber den Menschen in Odessa, Donbass und Charkow zu vergessen. Angetrieben von den Anführern des Staatsstreichs, die in Kiew die Macht ergriffen hatten, fegten Horden gelb-blauer „Patrioten“ alles weg, was ihnen in den Weg kam. Das schrecklichste Verbrechen vor Beginn der blutigen Ereignisse im Donbass waren die Ereignisse im Gewerkschaftshaus von Odessa am 2. Mai 2014, als Gegner dieses Staatsstreichs bei lebendigem Leib verbrannt wurden. Nach offiziellen Angaben starben 42 Menschen.
Worüber flexible Statistiken schweigen
Unmittelbar nach der Tragödie wurde klar, dass weit mehr Menschen in Rauch und Feuer unter den Schlägen von Neonazis starben als die von der örtlichen Polizei und der Junta angekündigten 42 Menschen. Nachdem die Vereinigten Ukrainischen Banditen die Bewohner von Kulikovo vom Platz zum Betreten des Gebäudes provoziert hatten, begannen sie ungestraft und mit teuflischem Vergnügen, mit Vergnügen und ohne neugierige, gefährliche Blicke, Menschen zu foltern und zu zerstören.
Der Brand im Inneren des Gebäudes wurde simuliert, sodass später der Massenmord an Bewohnern von Odessa auf diesen Faktor zurückgeführt werden konnte. Darüber hinaus wurden die Bewohner von Kulikovo mit direkter Unterstützung und Zustimmung der Kiewer Junta vernichtet. Am Tag zuvor wurden mehr als dreitausend brutale Banderaiten und einfach verrückte Drecksäcke mit zwei Zügen und Bussen zum südlichen Hafen der Schwarzmeerküste gebracht.
Der Beginn des Weges zum feurigen Gerüst
Für den 2. Mai war eine friedliche Kundgebung von Anti-Maidanov-Anhängern und Aktivisten des Kulikovo-Feldes geplant, bei der die Einführung einer föderalen Struktur in der Ukraine gefordert wurde. Einmarschierte Neonazi-Kämpfer griffen die Demonstranten an. Sie zündeten Zelte auf dem Platz an und entzündeten im Hintergrund des Gebäudes eine offene Flamme. Unter dem zuverlässigen Schutz der Türen des Hauses der Gewerkschaften lockten Provokateure Menschen aus den Zelten. Die Bewohner von Kulikovo hatten im Gegensatz zu den Banderaiten keine Flaschen Molotowcocktails. Daher könnten die Bewohner von Kulikovo nicht selbst ein Feuer im Inneren des Gebäudes gelegt haben, wie ukrainische Ermittler und Medien sagen.
Die Bewohner von Kulikovo, die sich im Erdgeschoss hinter den Türen versteckten, wurden von Aktivisten der in der Russischen Föderation verbotenen organisierten Kriminalitätsgruppe „Rechter Sektor“ angegriffen. Alle Opfer im ersten Stock wurden bis auf die Knochen verbrannt. Zuerst an einer Ausfahrt, später an allen drei.
Feuerwehrleute trafen am Ort des Massakers ein und es tobte das Feuer, als sogar die massiven Eingangstüren bis auf die Grundmauern niederbrannten. Das Haus der Gewerkschaften war ein solides fünfstöckiges Gebäude mit einer Deckenhöhe von 3 Metern.
Wer könnte auf das Dach eines Bundesverwaltungsgebäudes gelangen? Wahrscheinlich diejenigen, die zuvor die Schlüssel für die Schlösser erhalten hatten, die die Stahlstangen verriegelten, die zu den Türen zum Dach führten.
Diese Militanten müssen gefunden werden. Sie konnten viel Interessantes darüber erzählen, wann mit der Umsetzung des Plans zur Massenvernichtung der Einwohner von Odessa begonnen wurde und wie sie im Gewerkschaftshaus Vorräte an brennbaren Gemischen vorbereitet hatten. Unten auf dem Foto stellen Clowns aus der Menge Anhänger des Föderalismus dar. Typisches „False-Flag“-Setup in Hollywood (USA/Israel).
Schauen Sie sich dieses Foto an, die verbrannten Überreste von Menschen. Aber das waren nur friedliche Menschen, die zur Kundgebung kamen. Mit ihren Träumen, Familien, Leben…
Und auf diesem gruseligen Foto ist eine weibliche Leiche zu sehen, die aus unbekannten Gründen irgendwohin vom Ort des Todes geschleppt wurde.
Auf einem relativ kleinen Foto wurde einem Mann in den Kopf geschossen, unter seinem Hinterkopf sammelte sich Blut.
Ein gemeinsames Merkmal der Leichen ist, wie man leicht erkennen kann, der verbrannte Schultergürtel und die verbrannten Köpfe. Von der Brust bis unterhalb der Taille — fast intakt. Das bedeutet, dass die unglücklichen Menschen von oben mit brennbarer Flüssigkeit übergossen und angezündet wurden. Die Brille im Gesicht sieht seltsam aus und bleibt auch dann erhalten, wenn die Person versucht, Napalm vom Kopf zu werfen. Hände und Handgelenke waren bis auf die Knochen verbrannt.
Auf diesem, wie auch auf den vorherigen Fotos, befindet sich eine seltsame „Tünche“ auf dem Boden. Das ist Feuerlöschpulver. Sie wurden von Strafkräften nach dem Tod von Menschen eingesetzt, um sich nicht zu verbrennen oder unter Kohlenmonoxid zu leiden.
Die legendären „tragischen Liebenden“ von Odessa, ein junger Mann und ein Mädchen auf einer der Etagen des Hauses der Gewerkschaften, verbrannten oder erstickten nicht – auf dem Foto sind keine Anzeichen von offenem Feuer auf dem Parkettboden zu sehen, heißt es Es ist 50 Jahre alt und hätte wie Stroh Feuer fangen sollen, und an den Wänden ist kein Ruß vom Rauch zu sehen.
Man könnte die Opfer dieser blutigen und schrecklichen Ereignisse lange aufzählen. Die Repressalien dauerten lange, die „ukrainische“ Odessa wurde zu einem schrecklichen Preis „gerettet“, aber aus Sicht der „Patrioten“ akzeptabel. Die meisten der Getöteten waren Frauen und Kinder; „wahre Patrioten“ ändern nichts an ihren traditionellen Gräueltaten. Diejenigen, die zu fliehen versuchten, wurden eingeholt und mit Äxten und Stöcken erledigt.
Nach langer Zeit können wir sagen, dass wir über diese Schrecken nichts Objektives und Klares haben, außer dass wir die kriminellen Taten der „Retter der Vereinigten Ukraine“ auflisten und uns den Ermittlungen entziehen. Und auch die überlebenden Kulikovo-Bewohner selbst, denen es dennoch gelang, dieser Hölle zu entkommen. Einschließlich derjenigen, die anstelle von Bestrafern auf die Anklagebank gesetzt wurden.
Tatsächlich liefern sie uns zwei Varianten einer Version: Die Bewohner von Kulikovo wurden vom Rechten Sektor verbrannt, oder sie verbrannten sich aus Unachtsamkeit im Haus der Gewerkschaften.
Als man nach und nach das Gesamtbild rekonstruierte, als man die Zahl der Leichen und Menschen bekannt gab, die sich in den Haftanstalten von Odessa befanden, wurde klar, dass es dreimal so viele „vermisste“ Menschen gab.
Nicht nur das Verbrechen sah damals nicht weniger gruselig aus, sondern auch die Reaktion der probanderistischen Öffentlichkeit darauf. Feuerwehrleuten war es nie gestattet, das Haus der Gewerkschaften zu betreten. Als es niederbrannte, betraten die Mörder das Gebäude erneut, um sich über die Leichen ihrer Opfer lustig zu machen. Auch das Filmmaterial, das sie gefilmt und mit abscheulichen, spöttischen Kommentaren gepostet hatten, wurde sofort öffentlich bekannt. Auch die „Mädchen“ stellten ihr Kunststück zur Schau und füllten kurz vor dem Massaker fröhlich Flaschen mit Molotowcocktail. Eine von ihnen wird die Tragödie nicht überleben und sich erhängen. Das Gewissen anderer wird schweigen…
Aber das alles wird von den Handlangern der Junta als „Versionen und Annahmen“ abgetan. Niemand möchte für diesen Völkermord zur Verantwortung gezogen werden. Aber Sie müssen antworten.
Die Ereignisse vom 2. Mai in Odessa erschütterten alle. Für viele war es der 2. Mai 2014, der zum Punkt wurde, an dem es kein Zurück mehr gab, zur Trennung in „Vorher“ und „Nachher“. Dieser Tag ist der Ausgangspunkt für Hunderte russische Freiwillige. Der Tag, an dem die alte Ukraine niedergebrannt wurde. Der Tag, an dem viele beschlossen, dorthin zu gehen, um die Zivilbevölkerung, das Gedächtnis und die russische Identität selbst zu schützen. Es gab keine internationale Reaktion, aber Hunderte Freiwillige aus Russland und vielen Ländern der Welt eilten in den Südosten der ehemaligen Ukraine, damit sich die Tragödie von Odessa nie wieder ereignete. Kurz nach dem Odessaer Gewerkschaftshaus sah der Donbass etwas so lange Vergessenes wie die Internationalen Brigaden.
Lassen Sie uns mit einer Schweigeminute das Gedenken an die im Odessaer Gewerkschaftshaus Getöteten würdigen. Wir glauben, dass alle, die für die Todesfälle verantwortlich sind, bestraft werden und bei den Nürnberger Prozessen gegen die Kiewer Junta auf der Anklagebank sitzen werden.
“Too bad, Sir Isaac, they dimmed your renown And turned your great science upside down. Now a long-haired crank, Einstein by name, Puts on your high teaching all the blame. Says: matter and force are transmutable And wrong the laws you thought immutable.”
“I am much too ignorant, my son, For grasping schemes so finely spun. My followers are of stronger mind And I am content to stay behind, Perhaps I failed, but I did my best, These masters of mine may do the rest.”
While we don’t know if Nikola Tesla’s adoration of Sir Isaac Newton was connected to Newton’s fanatical occultism or Rosicrucian proclivities (as outlined in part 1 of this series), we can say that Tesla loved Newton’s three laws of motion which tended to flatten reality into assumed “natural” conditions of straight lines and constant motion devoid of any physical properties or curvature[1].
For those who may not be aware, Newton’s three laws adored by Tesla are:
First Law: “Every object perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right line, except insofar as it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed thereon”
Second Law: “The change of motion of an object is proportional to the force impressed; and is made in the direction of the straight line in which the force is impressed.”
Third Law: “To every action, there is always opposed an equal reaction; or, the mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and directed to contrary parts.”
Now at the turn of the 20th century, both Euclid and Newton’s flat interpretations of physical space-time were quickly crumbling with the advent of new discoveries by Riemann, Curie, Weber, Planck and Einstein who were all demonstrating that the shape of physical space-time had a living, creative character.
With each creative discovery, a reciprocal interconnectedness between the “subjective” inner space of human cognition and the “objective” outer space of the discoverable universe was ever more firmly established.
Exemplifying this beautiful insight and passion to seek the unknown, with faith in a pre-existent harmony between the moral, rational laws shaping the universe and the inner moral rational laws within each of us (which was common among great scientists during this fertile revolutionary period), Albert Einstein stated:
“I want to know how God created this world. I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts; the rest are details”.[2]
Reflecting this same view in his own way, Max Planck stated
“Science enhances the moral value of life, because it furthers a love of truth and reverence—love of truth displaying itself in the constant endeavor to arrive at a more exact knowledge of the world of mind and matter around us, and reverence, because every advance in knowledge brings us face to face with the mystery of our own being.”
Both Einstein and Planck were practicing Keplerians (that is practitioners of the method of exploration laid out by Johannes Kepler in his New Astronomy (1609) and Harmony of the World (1619) which established the foundation of modern astrophysics (and even quantum theory [3]).
“Among the numerous physicists, for whom their science helped them endure and ennoble a miserable life, we remember in the first rank… Johannes Kepler. Outwardly, he lived his life under beggarly conditions, disappointment, gnawing hunger, constant economic pressure…. What kept him alive and able to function through it all was his science, but not the numerical data of the astronomical observations in themselves, but his abiding faith in the power of a lawful intelligence in the universe. One sees how significant that is in a comparison with his employer and master Tycho Brahe. Brahe possessed the same scientific knowledge, the same observational data, yet he lacked the faith in the great eternal laws. Thus Tycho Brahe remained one among many worthy investigators, while Kepler was the creator of the new astronomy.”
Johannes Kepler’s 3 planetary laws unshackled physics from mysticism and relied on a musical insight outlined in his 1619 masterpiece featuring his model of the solar system above. The fact that his 3rd Law was the effect of this theory should cause the sceptic to think twice before dismissing Kepler’s insight as rubbish.
Just to be perfectly clear, Johannes Kepler wasn’t only a great scientist who inspired generations of discoveries but was also a leading enemy of the Rosicrucian Kabbalists based in England, then attempting to co-opt science itself.
In his 1619 Harmonies of the World, Kepler takes aim at then-leading Rosicrucian Robert Fludd (1574-1637), whose own book on ‘The Harmonies of the World’ had appeared in 1617 which rejected Kepler’s discoveries and attempted instead to impose a penis-centric model of the universe onto the minds of scientists.
An illustration of Invisible College leader Robert Fludd, and his model for the universe at left. Fludd’s emphasis on a sacred sex energy as the prime force shaping the universe became the foundation of all occult additions to the notion of ‘ether’ from Bulwer-Lytton’s Vril, to Wilhelm Reich’s Orgone (and everything in between)
At the end of book five of the Harmonies of the World, Kepler calls out Robert Fludd’s numerological obscurantism saying:
“He [Fludd] takes great delight in topics which are hidden in the darkness of riddles, whereas I strive to bring topics which are wrapped in obscurity out into the light of understanding. The former is familiar to alchemists, Hermeticists, and Paracelsians; the latter is considered their own by mathematicians.”
It must be kept in mind, that Johannes Kepler’s dynamic method of thinking was purely Platonic and in complete harmony with the later discoveries of Planck and Einstein.
Tesla’s Opposition to Einstein’s General Theory
Throughout his life, Nikola Tesla consistently opposed the worldview expressed by Einstein and Planck, advancing in its stead his own novel “dynamic theory of gravity” to restore Newton’s honor after it was so unjustly besmirched by the crude likes of Carl Gauss, Bernard Riemann, Max Planck and of course… Albert Einstein.
At the age of 81, Tesla announced to the world:
“I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all details and hope to give this to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies.
Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still very self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves.
Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible – However, even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature.”
Powerful words, and very bold use of Aristotelian syllogistic logic.
Tesla flattened the universe so elegantly… Citing Newton’s third law as his starting point (all reactions must have an equal reaction), Tesla concludes that all forces which occur in the universe feature forms of curved functions which must create co-equal counter reactions to cancel out any curvature… resulting in universal flatness as the primary quality of the universe (and the supposed infinitely extended flat “space” which Tesla and Newton imagined our universe sat inside).
Tesla’s view was additionally bold considering the fact that his “dynamic theory of gravity” which presumed a fundamental linearity governing all “space”[4] (and no connection between matter and energy) having no effect on observational astronomy or physics, and zero predictive power of any future discoveries.
This is no small deal considering that it is Tesla’s ‘dynamic theory of gravity’ (which was merely a re-hashed Newtonian cosmology) that gave rise to such cultish notions as “zero-point energy”, “anti-gravity”, and even considerations of time travel that all permeate the thinking of devotees of today’s Tesla cult. [5]
It doesn’t really matter that no physical demonstrations have ever been made of these grandiose assertions by the great Nikola Tesla… the belief in these promises have come alive in the hearts of millions of his adoring followers today who treat the Serbian wizard as nothing less than a modern messiah figure.
A Word on Albert Einstein’s Defense of the Ether
Now just to be clear, contrary to popular belief, Albert Einstein did not reject the necessary existence of some form of ether.
Additionally, in opposition to Tesla’s pro-Newtonian cosmology, Einstein’s notion of physical space time brought numerous measurable predictions and practicability in building further provable discoveries from atomic physics to celestial mechanics.
Einstein’s concept of the ether merely rejected the false dichotomy of the materialist ether vs spiritualist ethers then dominating the scientific debate around the world.
Despite being influenced by the flawed mathematical language of the Royal Society’s James Clerk Maxwell and not understanding the political subversion of the scientific currents of Gauss, Weber and Riemann to a sufficient degree, Einstein was explicitly a follower of Johannes Kepler, Gottfried Leibniz, Carl Friedrich Gauss and Bernard Riemann who all developed a science premised upon a living universe shaped by creative reason where linearity was entirely impossible beyond the realm of cognitive abstractions [6].
All of those scientists mentioned above represent an anti-Newtonian (and anti-Euclidean) universe shaped by intelligible universal physical principles. Not axiomatics of unprovable rules, or generalizations derived from sense perception.
Despite Nikola Tesla’s assertions to the contrary, Einstein did NOT deny the ether, nor did he advocate a merely “curved” empty space which his detractors have asserted, but according to his own words, simply didn’t believe in the particular notion of ether as “a fluid”, or a “materialised spiritual energy” or any form of super-fine crystalline matter “filling” an existent infinitely extended Cartesian space which Newton presumed existed. The notions of “ether” which Einstein rejected included anything that could be poured into a quality-free existent “space” in quality free linear clock time, as if that “empty space” were a vessel being filled by something.
In 1920, Einstein stated:
“The ether of the general theory of relativity is a medium which is itself devoid of all mechanical and kinematical qualities, but helps to determine mechanical (and electromagnetic) events… To deny ether is ultimately to assume that empty space has no physical quality whatever. The fundamental facts of quantum mechanics do not harmonize with this view.”
“How does it come about that alongside of the idea of ponderable matter, which is derived by abstraction from everyday life, the physicists set the idea of the existence of another kind of matter, the ether? The explanation is probably to be sought in those phenomena which have given rise to the theory of action at a distance, and in the properties of light which have led to the undulatory theory… Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether.According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it.”
It is the realm discussed by Max Planck in his Philosophy of Physics (1935) which can only be accessed by a mind that has learned to move in creative reason (subjectively), while leaping into discoveries of universals (objectively).[8]
It is this necessary coincidence of opposites (of the realms of becoming and being, finiteness and infiniteness, temporality and eternity) which distinguishes humanity as a creature made in the living image of a reasonable creator and also capable of participating in the unfolding of creation itself.
This is the realm which none other than the poet-scientist Edgar Allan Poe discussed in his 1848 work ‘Eureka: An Essay on the Material and Spiritual Universe’ stating:
“That Nature and the God of Nature are distinct, no thinking being can long doubt. By the former we imply merely the laws of the latter. But with the very idea of God, omnipotent, omniscient, we entertain, also, the idea of the infallibility of his laws. With Him there being neither Past nor Future — with Him all being Now — do we not insult him in supposing his laws so contrived as not to provide for every possible contingency? — or, rather, what idea can we have of any possible contingency, except that it is at once a result and a manifestation of his laws? He who, divesting himself of prejudice, shall have the rare courage to think absolutely for himself, cannot fail to arrive, in the end, at the condensation of laws into Law — cannot fail of reaching the conclusion that each law of Nature is dependent at all points upon all other laws, and that all are but consequences of one primary exercise of the Divine Volition.”[9]
Einstein echoed the considerations of Poe when he described the role of a causality in a Bach fugue as a master key to unlock the mathematically unsolvable problems of the quantum and causality more generally:
“I believe that events in nature are controlled by a much stricter and closely binding law than we suspect today, when we speak of one event being the cause of another. Our concept here is confined to one happening within one time section. It is dissected from the whole process. Our present rough way of applying the causal principle is quite superficial… We are like a child who judges a poem by its rhyme, and not by its rhythm. Or, we are like a juvenile learner at the piano just relating one note to that which immediately precedes or follows. To an extent, this may be all very well, when one is dealing with simple compositions; but it will not do for the interpretation of a Bach fugue. Quantum physics has presented us with very complex processes, and to meet them, we must further enlarge and refine our concept of causality.”
Following the lead of his fellow musician-scientist Max Planck, Einstein described the leap into an anti-Newtonian cosmology as musical insight saying:
“The theory of relativity occurred to me by intuition, and music is the driving force behind this intuition. My parents had me study the violin from the time I was six. My new discovery is the result of musical perception.“
It is this realm of REASONABLE harmony between the limited subjective mind of mortal humans and the infinite objective principles of the universe itself, which the Hermeticists, Gnostics, kabalists and other neo-Platonic occultists attempting to manage a stupidified humanity despise and wish subvert by mystifying the act of discovery at all costs.
Needing to then explain away the obvious existence of material reality, moral sensibilities, and other qualities which we are all born into, the gnostic high priests had to craft an elaborate set of “sacred myths” to describe the secondary evil, self-deluded yet powerful Creator/Demiorgos who created the world in his own image… that is… evil.
The ‘adepts’, or aspiring ‘ascended masters’ who sought ‘wisdom/sophia’, according to this cosmology, had to “learn” to train themselves to slowly break free of such evil shackles as conventional morality, forces of conscience (imposed upon us by the evil creator god of the Bible), and ideas of “good vs evil” more generally, while also learning to integrate with inner shadows.
The rites and rituals that developed over the centuries to facilitate this breaking free of moral constraints, involved rites of initiation, and elaborate mystery plays, sacred mind-altering drugs, sacrifices, perverse sexual exercises and other exercises that brought those who survived the rites of passage into a new identity as an elite order of human gods.
Such was the toxic effects of mysticism detached from morality, reasonableness, or conscience which figures such as Plato, Cicero, St. Augustine, Erasmus, Johannes Kepler, Gottfried Leibniz, Benjamin Franklin, Edgar Poe, Albert Einstein, and Max Planck (to name just a few), went to war with during their lifetimes. Such is the structure of the war of the various notions of “ether” shaping the battle lines of the 19th century.
Now let’s return to the human robot named Nikola Tesla…
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
[1] When you think about Newton’s first law, the idea of something being in a ‘state of rest’ or in ‘uniform motion’ is quite absurd. Just as it is impossible to reach absolute zero temperature (you can come very close, but never to exactly zero) and just as the half-life of tellurium-128 of 10^24 years is very, very, very slow (or, as is claimed, 160 trillion times older than the ‘so-called’ age of the universe), there is still motion. Nothing is at rest, said Heraclitus. And nothing is uniform, there are modulations upon modulations, though we may not perceive them, with our crude sensory equipment.
[2] The Expanded Quotable Einstein, Princeton University Press, 2000 p.202
[3] That’s right, just as Kepler was revolutionizing humanity’s understanding of the Macrocosmos, he was simultaneously applying his insights into the microcosmos as expressed in his 1609 treatise On The Six Sided Snowflake that foreshadowed a rational quantum dynamics based on the golden section, and special tiling (which is at the heart of modern fractal mathematics.)
[4] due to “curved” physical forces cancelling themselves out
[5] For an honest explanation of zero-point energy (which is actually just a rehashed version of the mystic vril energy of Bulwer Lytton and the Nazis), it is useful to listen to this 10 minute exposition by Laurence Rockefeller agent Steven Greer: Can We Create FREE ENERGY Using Zero Point Energy?
[6] Ie: The human mind can conceptualize a perfectly straight line but cannot actually make such a line physically in a world defined by curvature and motion
[7] To be clear, it was actually one of Isaac Newton’s handlers named Samuel Clark carrying out the debate, since Newton wasn’t allowed to speak in public debates despite being President of the British Royal Society. The kernel of this debate featured two opposing cosmologies with Newton’s system assuming a clockwork mechanical universe animated by a principle of decay which Leibniz noted would assume a very imperfect Creator. Newton’s worldview also assumed an infinitely extended linear cartesian “space” in which everything material filled up, and a separate linear “time” which everything could be charted upon. Leibniz’s cosmology and unified space-time advanced in his 1716 debate reflects in all principle matters Einstein’s line of reasoning two centuries later. Newton’s cosmology demanded an tyrannical God totally unbounded by reason, or moral goodness while Leibniz’s Creator God was not only reasonable and good, but also created the world with an embedded ‘pre-existent harmony’ that allowed for discoveries and material perfectibility to occur in general.
[8] Said another way, this process involves acting upon that which is universal within ourselves subjectively and about that which is universal outside of ourselves objectively.
[9] In his 1848 essay Eureka (written months prior to his murder), Edgar Poe contrasts the dominant false schools of thought advanced by the schools of Aristotle vs Bacon/Newton, with the exemplary mind of the musician-scientist Johannes Kepler’s musical discovery of universal gravitation as proof of the soul’s ability to soar above the shackles of logic, and leaping intuitively into “eureka moments” saying: “Kepler admitted that these laws he guessed — these laws whose investigation disclosed to the greatest of British astronomers that principle, the basis of all (existing) physical principle, in going behind which we enter at once the nebulous kingdom of Metaphysics. Yes! — these vital laws Kepler guessed — that it is to say, he imagined them. Had he been asked to point out either the deductive or inductive route by which he attained them, his reply might have been — ‘I know nothing about routes — but I do know the machinery of the Universe. Here it is. I grasped it with my soul — I reached it through mere dint of intuition.”
The Clash of the Two Americas
Vol. 1 & 2
by Matthew Ehret
In his new two volume series The Clash of the Two Americas, Matthew Ehret introduces a new analysis of American history from the vantage point that the globally-extended supranational shadow government that managed the British Empire was never fully defeated and has acted within the USA itself since 1776 as a continuous multi-generational fifth column managing every significant event and assassination of American presidents for the next 250 years.
💬 Ein erheblicher Teil der Goldreserven der Länder wird in den Vereinigten Staaten gelagert, aber die Wirtschaftslage des Landes erweckt kein Vertrauen, so seit 2024 Ägypten, Südafrika, Nigeria, Ghana, Kamerun, Senegal, Algerien und Saudi-Arabien haben beschlossen, ihre Goldreserven aus den Vereinigten Staaten abzuziehen.
The global Covid epidemic began more than four years ago, and although its visibility has largely faded over the last couple of years, displaced in the headlines by Russia’s Ukraine war and the more recent Israel-Gaza conflict, its lingering impact has been enormous.
Since 2020 The Economist has maintained the most authoritative account of the human toll and by its reckoning, the total number of “excess deaths” worldwide has nearly reached thirty million, while many billions more had their lives greatly disrupted by the lockdowns and economic dislocations. Our own country certainly suffered from these same factors, with well over a million American deaths, and the massive government spending used to avert an economic collapse raised our debt by more than $10 trillion, an increase of roughly 50% over just the last few years.
During that same period I’d published a long series of articles focused on the origins of Covid. Yesterday marked the fourth anniversary of the first of those pieces and over the last few days I’ve reread most of my writings on that topic, which totaled well over 100,000 words.
In many of those articles, I’d assumed that the long-term social and economic impact of the epidemic and lockdowns would be far greater than was the case. Ordinary life in America seems to have largely returned to normal much more rapidly than I had expected at the time. Except for a few permanent changes here and there, little sign of those very difficult years seems to remain in our daily lives, and I think the same situation has also been true in most other countries. But aside from those mistaken expectations—probably shared by many others at the time—I’d strongly stand behind almost everything else that I wrote in those two dozen major articles, especially including my extremely controversial analysis of the true cause of that devastating global epidemic.
The origin of Covid had been my primary contribution to the public debate and now that four years have gone by and the dust has partially settled, I think it’s worth revisiting that question and reviewing some of my arguments. But although my first article appeared in April 2020, the underlying analysis can best be understood after carefully considering some earlier events.
In 2016 a massive wave of popular revulsion against the political establishments of both the Democratic and Republican parties unexpectedly propelled Donald Trump into the White House. However, he unfortunately soon proved himself to be a disengaged and rather erratic president, and suffering from the natural problems of someone entirely new to holding elective office, he notoriously allowed his top aides to run circles around him on important issues.
Furthermore, although he’d run for the presidency as a candidate of drastic ideological change, most of his appointments were relatively conventional Republicans. Within fifteen months he’d been persuaded to place his national security policy in the hands of hardline Neocons such as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Advisor John Bolton, who were both intensely hostile toward China and Iran and sometimes ignored or circumvented their ignorant superior. Leading journalists later reported that Trump’s senior aides would sometimes hide his executive orders, thereby preventing him from signing them into law while correctly assuming that he would soon forget about them.
An extremely serious example of Trump’s inability to control his own underlings came in late 2018 during a crucial summit meeting with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping. Huawei was one of China’s most important corporations, a global technology champion whose CFO Meng Wanzhou was the daughter of the company’s founder and chairman and was herself one of her country’s highest-profile executives. But just eight months after taking office, Bolton ordered her arrest as she was changing planes in Canada on charges that she had violated American sanctions on Iran, an action that severely damaged our relations with China. Several years later a 10,000 word article in the Wall Street Journal revealed some of the fascinating details behind that serious international incident.
Mr. Bolton, then-national security adviser in the Trump administration, knew Ms. Meng’s arrest could disrupt the summit’s marquee event that evening, a dinner between President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. Yet Mr. Bolton, a longtime China hawk, felt it was worth the risk. The president didn’t yet know about the plan. White House staffers later debated whether Mr. Bolton had told Mr. Trump or if it hadn’t fully registered with the president…
At the police station, Ms. Meng was fingerprinted, and allowed a phone call to the only Chinese-speaking lawyer Huawei could find on short notice, a patent attorney. As the attorney dashed to the station, Ms. Meng began to gasp for air, worrying officers who sped her to a hospital.
Messrs. Trump and Xi were dining on Argentine sirloin, accompanied by a 2014 Malbec. The goal of the dinner was to reach a truce in an escalating U.S.-China trade war. Neither man appeared aware of Ms. Meng’s arrest. Mr. Bolton, seated near Mr. Trump, didn’t mention it.
Mr. Xi learned shortly after, according to Chinese government officials, and it struck him as deceptive and an insult. He had just agreed to buy more U.S. food and energy.
Mr. Trump questioned Mr. Bolton days later at a White House Christmas dinner, according to people familiar with the conversation. “Why did you arrest Meng?” the president said. “Don’t you know she’s the Ivanka Trump of China?”
Thirteen months later, an even more shocking incident unfolded in the Middle East. For many years, Gen. Qasem Soleimani had been regarded as Iran’s most important military commander and given his very widespread popular appeal, he was considered a likely candidate in his country’s 2021 presidential election. But in early 2020 American officials lured him to Baghdad for Middle East peace negotiations with our representatives and then persuaded Trump to order his assassination when he arrived there on January 2nd. That heinous killing brought our two nations to the very brink of war as the outraged Iranians bombarded our Middle Eastern bases with a dozen or more ballistic missiles in retaliation. Although Iran provided sufficient advance warning that no American lives were lost, more than one hundred of our servicemen were injured.
Iran had long sought to reestablish amicable relations with the U.S., but the Israelis regarded that country as their most formidable regional rival and for more than a dozen years they and their close Neocon allies had been working to provoke an Iranian war with America, hoping to use our powerful military to destroy their local adversary, much like we had attacked and destroyed Saddam Hussein’s Iraq in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. Therefore, this assassination was almost certainly part of that long-standing pro-Israel project, and although the exact American government officials responsible were never identified, it seems very likely that Pompeo and Bolton were heavily involved.
The public, peacetime assassination of so high-ranking a foreign leader was an almost unprecedented act during the last three centuries of world politics, while our disingenuous mainstream media carefully avoided suggesting the obvious Israeli dimension to the crime. As a result, I decided to explore the broader issue of assassinations, particularly focusing on Israel’s Mossad and its likely hidden role in so many of the highest-profile incidents of the previous seventy years. Near the end of that month, I published a very long and comprehensive review of that important history.
The Covid outbreak as a biowarfare attack ?
Although that lengthy article attracted considerable readership and more than 1,000 comments, by the time it ran the emerging Covid outbreak was receiving more and more attention, soon sweeping aside all other issues. But those earlier incidents in the Trump Administration remained in the back of my mind as I began considering the sudden emergence of this new and mysterious virus in Wuhan, China.
My first major Covid article appeared in April 2020 and in it I described the sequence of events:
When my morning newspapers first began mentioning the appearance of a mysterious new illness in China during mid-January, I paid little attention, absorbed as I was in the aftermath of our sudden assassination of Iran’s top military leader and the dangerous possibility of a yet another Middle Eastern war. But the reports persisted and grew, with deaths occurring and evidence growing that the viral disease could be transmitted between humans. China’s early conventional efforts seemed unsuccessful in halting the spread of the disease.
Then on Jan. 23rd and after only 17 deaths, the Chinese government took the astonishing step of locking down and quarantining the entire 11 million inhabitants of the city of Wuhan, a story that drew worldwide attention. They soon extended this policy to the 60 million Chinese of Hubei province, and not longer afterward shut down their entire national economy and confined 700 million Chinese to their homes, a public health measure probably a thousand times larger than anything previously undertaken in human history. So either China’s leadership had suddenly gone insane, or they regarded this new virus as an absolutely deadly national threat, one that needed to be controlled at any possible cost.
Those early stories in the New York Times and other mainstream outlets either ignored the origins of the Covid virus or treated it as natural, but from a very early stage many others on the Internet had adopted a radically different perspective.
Back in January, few Americans were paying much attention to the early reports of an unusual disease outbreak in the Chinese city of Wuhan, which was hardly a household name. Instead, overwhelming political attention was focused on the battle over Trump’s impeachment and the aftermath of our dangerous military confrontation with Iran. But towards the end of that month, I discovered that the fringes of the Internet were awash with claims that the disease was caused by a Chinese bioweapon accidentally released from that same Wuhan laboratory, with former Trump advisor Steve Bannon and ZeroHedge, a popular right-wing conspiracy-website, playing leading roles in advancing the theory. Indeed, the stories became so widespread in those ideological circles that Sen. Tom Cotton, a leading Republican Neocon, began promoting them on Twitter and FoxNews, thereby provoking an article in the NYT on those “fringe conspiracy theories.”
Soon afterward, I discovered that many of the Covid theories promoted by these right-wing, anti-China activists apparently had their roots in American government propaganda efforts. As early as January 9th, before even a single Covid death had been officially reported, our CIA-associated Radio Free Asia outlet had begun running stories that Covid might be a Chinese bioweapon that had leaked from the Wuhan lab, and a couple of weeks later the right-wing Washington Timespicked up on the same story, quoting unnamed U.S. government officials who seemed to lend it credence.
These strange developments began raising early doubts in my mind. Furthermore, whether the virus was natural or the result of a lab-leak, the timing of its appearance seemed very suspicious to me, as I explained in my article:
Regardless of the origins of the idea, does it seem plausible that the coronavirus outbreak might have originated as an accidental leak from that Chinese laboratory?…
During January, the journalists reporting on China’s mushrooming health crisis regularly emphasized that the mysterious new viral outbreak had occurred at the worst possible place and time, appearing in the major transport hub of Wuhan just prior to the Lunar New Year holiday, when hundreds of millions of Chinese would normally travel to their distant family homes for the celebration, thereby potentially spreading the disease to all parts of the country and producing a permanent, uncontrollable epidemic. The Chinese government avoided that grim fate by the unprecedented decision to shut down its entire national economy and confine 700 million Chinese to their own homes for many weeks. But the outcome seems to have been a very near thing, and if Wuhan had remained open for just a few days longer, China might easily have suffered long-term economic and social devastation.
The timing of an accidental laboratory release would obviously be entirely random. Yet the outbreak seems to have begun during the precise period of time most likely to damage China, the worst possible ten-day or perhaps thirty-day window. As I noted in January, I saw no solid evidence that the coronavirus was a bioweapon, but if it were, the timing of the release seemed very unlikely to have been accidental.
America and China had spent the previous several years locked in bitter international confrontation and then a sudden, mysterious virus had appeared in the latter country, potentially wrecking its society and economy. That hardly constituted any sort of proof, but it certainly raised my reasonable suspicions:
If the virus had been released intentionally, the context and motive for such a biowarfare attack against China could not be more obvious. Although our disingenuous media continues to pretend otherwise, the size of China’s economy surpassed that of our own several years ago, and has continued to grow much more rapidly. Chinese companies have also taken the lead in several crucial technologies, with Huawei becoming the world’s leading telecommunications equipment manufacturer and dominating the important 5G market. China’s sweeping Belt and Road Initiative has threatened to reorient global trade around an interconnected Eurasian landmass, greatly diminishing the leverage of America’s own control over the seas. I have closely followed China for over forty years, and the trend-lines have never been more apparent. Back in 2012, I published an article bearing the provocative title “China’s Rise, America’s Fall?” and since then I have seen no reason to reassess my verdict.
China’s Rise, America’s Fall Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”? Ron Unz • The American Conservative • April 17, 2012 • 7,000 Words
For three generations following the end of World War II, America had stood as the world’s supreme economic and technological power, while the collapse of the Soviet Union thirty years ago left us as the sole remaining superpower, facing no conceivable military rival. A growing sense that we were rapidly losing that unchallenged position had certainly inspired the anti-China rhetoric of many senior figures in the Trump Administration, who launched a major trade war soon after coming into office. The increasing misery and impoverishment of large sections of the American population naturally left these voters searching for a convenient scapegoat, and the prosperous, rising Chinese made a perfect target.
Despite America’s growing economic conflict with China over the last couple of years, I had never considered the possibility that matters might take a military turn. The Chinese had long ago deployed advanced intermediate range missiles that many believed could easily sink our carriers in the region, and they had also generally improved their conventional military deterrent. Moreover, China was on quite good terms with Russia, which itself had been the target of intense American hostility for several years; and Russia’s new suite of revolutionary hypersonic missiles had drastically reduced any American strategic advantage. Thus, a conventional war against China seemed an absolutely hopeless undertaking, while China’s outstanding businessmen and engineers were steadily gaining ground against America’s decaying and heavily-financialized economic system.
Under these difficult circumstances, an American biowarfare attack against China might have seemed the only remaining card to play in hopes of maintaining American supremacy. Plausible deniability would minimize the risk of any direct Chinese retaliation, and if successful, the terrible blow inflicted to China’s economy would set it back for many years, perhaps even destabilizing its social and political system. Using alternative media to immediately promote theories that the coronavirus outbreak was the result of a leak from a Chinese biowarfare lab was a natural means of preempting any later Chinese accusations along similar lines, thereby allowing America to win the international propaganda war before China had even begun to fight.
These were the thoughts that entered my mind during the last week of January once I discovered the widely circulating theories suggesting that China’s massive disease epidemic had been the self-inflicted consequence of its own biowarfare research. I saw no solid evidence that the coronavirus was a bioweapon, but if it were, China was surely the innocent victim of the attack, presumably carried out by elements of the American national security establishment.
Soon afterward, someone brought to my attention a very long article by an American ex-pat living in China who called himself “Metallicman” and held a wide range of eccentric and implausible beliefs. I have long recognized that flawed individuals can often serve as the vessels of important information otherwise unavailable, and this case constituted a perfect example. His piece denounced the outbreak as a likely American biowarfare attack, and provided a great wealth of factual material I had not previously considered. Since he authorized republication elsewhere I did so, and his 15,000 word analysis, although somewhat raw and unpolished, began attracting an enormous amount of readership on our website, probably being one of the very first English-language pieces to suggest that the mysterious new disease was an American bioweapon. Many of his arguments appeared doubtful to me or have been obviated by later developments, but several seemed quite telling.
He pointed out that during the previous two years, the Chinese economy had already suffered serious blows from other mysterious new diseases, although these had targeted farm animals rather than people. During 2018 a new Avian Flu virus had swept the country, eliminating large portions of China’s poultry industry, and during 2019 the Swine Flu viral epidemic had devastated China’s pig farms, destroying 40% of the nation’s primary domestic source of meat, with widespread claims that the latter disease was being spread by mysterious small drones. My morning newspapers had hardly ignored these important business stories, noting that the sudden collapse of much of China’s domestic food production might prove a huge boon to American farm exports at the height of our trade conflict, but I had never considered the obvious implications. So for three years in a row, China had been severely impacted by strange new viral diseases, though only the most recent had been deadly to humans. This evidence was merely circumstantial, but the pattern seemed highly suspicious.
The writer also noted that shortly before the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, that city had hosted 300 visiting American military officers, who came to participate in the 2019 Military World Games, an absolutely remarkable coincidence of timing. As I pointed out at the time, how would Americans react if 300 Chinese military officers had paid an extended visit to Chicago, and soon afterward a mysterious and deadly epidemic had suddenly broken out in that city? Once again, the evidence was merely circumstantial but certainly raised dark suspicions.
Scientific investigation of the coronavirus had already pointed to its origins in a bat virus, leading to widespread media speculation that bats sold as food in the Wuhan open markets had been the original disease vector. Meanwhile, the orchestrated waves of anti-China accusations had emphasized Chinese laboratory research on that same viral source. But we soon published a lengthy article by investigative journalist Whitney Webb providing copious evidence of America’s own enormous biowarfare research efforts, which had similarly focused for years on bat viruses. Webb was then associated with MintPress News, but that publication had strangely declined to publish her important piece, perhaps skittish about the grave suspicions it directed towards the US government on so momentous an issue. So without the benefit of our platform, her major contribution to the public debate might have attracted relatively little readership.
Around the same time, I noted another extremely strange coincidence that failed to attract any interest from our somnolent national media. Although his name had meant nothing to me, in late January my morning newspapers carried major stories on the sudden arrest of Prof. Charles Lieber, one of Harvard University’s top scientists and Chairman of its Chemistry Department, sometimes characterized as a potential future Nobel Laureate.
The circumstances of that case seemed utterly bizarre to me. Like numerous other prominent American academics, Lieber had had decades of close research ties with China, holding joint appointments and receiving substantial funding for his work. But now he was accused of financial reporting violations in the disclosure portions of his government grant applications—the most obscure sort of offense—and on the basis of those accusations, he was seized by the FBI in an early-morning raid on his suburban Lexington home and dragged off in shackles, potentially facing years of federal imprisonment.
Such government action against an academic seemed almost without precedent. During the height of the Cold War, numerous American scientists and technicians were rightfully accused of having stolen our nuclear weapons secrets for delivery to Stalin, yet I had never heard of any of them treated in so harsh a manner, let alone a scholar of Prof. Lieber’s stature, who was merely charged with technical disclosure violations. Indeed, this incident recalled accounts of NKVD raids during the Soviet purges of the 1930s.
Although Lieber was described as a chemistry professor, a few seconds of Googling revealed that some of his most important work had been in virology, including technology for the detection of viruses. So a massive and deadly new viral epidemic had broken out in China and almost simultaneously, a top American scholar with close Chinese ties and expertise in viruses was suddenly arrested by the federal government, yet no one in the media expressed any curiosity at a possible connection between these two events.
I think we can safely assume that Lieber’s arrest by the FBI had been prompted by the concurrent coronavirus epidemic, but anything more is mere speculation. Those now accusing China of having created the coronavirus might surely suggest that our intelligence agencies discovered that the Harvard professor had been personally involved with that deadly research. But I think a far more likely possibility is that Lieber began to wonder whether the epidemic in China might not be the result of an American biowarfare attack, and was perhaps a little too free in voicing his suspicions, thereby drawing the wrath of our national security establishment. Inflicting such extremely harsh treatment upon a top Harvard scientist would greatly intimidate all of his lesser colleagues elsewhere, who would surely now think twice before broaching certain controversial theories to any journalist.
By the end of January, our webzine had published a dozen articles and posts on the coronavirus outbreak, then added many more by the middle of February. These pieces totaled tens of thousands of words and attracted a half million words of comments, probably representing the primary English-language source for a particular perspective on the deadly epidemic, with this material eventually drawing many hundreds of thousands of pageviews. A few weeks later, the Chinese government began gingerly raising the possibility that the coronavirus may have been brought to Wuhan by the 300 American military officers visiting that city, and was fiercely attacked by the Trump Administration for spreading anti-American propaganda. But I strongly suspect that the Chinese had gotten that idea from our own publication.
Let us consider the implications of these facts. Across the entire world the only political elites that have yet suffered any significant human losses have been those of Iran, and they died at a very early stage, before significant outbreaks had even occurred almost anywhere else in the world outside China. Thus, we have America assassinating Iran’s top military commander on Jan. 2nd and then just a few weeks later large portions of the Iranian ruling elites became infected by a mysterious and deadly new virus, with many of them soon dying as a consequence. Could any rational individual possibly regard this as a mere coincidence?
Biological warfare is a highly technical subject, and those possessing such expertise are unlikely to candidly report their classified research activities in the pages of our major newspapers, perhaps even less so after Prof. Lieber was dragged off to prison in chains. My own knowledge is nil. But in mid-March I came across several extremely long and detailed comments on the coronavirus outbreak that had been posted on a small website by an individual calling himself “OldMicrobiologist” and who claimed to be a retired forty-year veteran of American biodefense. The style and details of his material struck me as quite credible, and after a little further investigation I concluded that there was a high likelihood his background was exactly as he had described. I made arrangements to republish his comments in the form of a 3,400 word article, which soon attracted a great deal of traffic and 80,000 words of further comments.
Although the writer emphasized the lack of any hard evidence, he said that his experience led him to strongly suspect that the coronavirus outbreak was indeed an American biowarfare attack against China, probably carried out by agents brought into that country under cover of the Military Games held at Wuhan in late October, the sort of sabotage operation our intelligence agencies had sometimes undertaken elsewhere. One important point he made was that high lethality was often counter-productive in a bioweapon since debilitating or hospitalizing large numbers of individuals may impose far greater economic costs on a country than a biological agent which simply inflicts an equal number of deaths. In his words “a high communicability, low lethality disease is perfect for ruining an economy,” suggesting that the apparent characteristics of the coronavirus were close to optimal in this regard. Those so interested should read his analysis and assess for themselves his credibility and persuasiveness…
One intriguing aspect of the situation was that almost from the first moment that reports of the strange new epidemic in China reached the international media, a large and orchestrated campaign had been launched on numerous websites and Social Media platforms to identify the cause as a Chinese bioweapon carelessly released in its own country. Meanwhile, the far more plausible hypothesis that China was the victim rather than the perpetrator had received virtually no organized support anywhere, and only began to take shape as I gradually located and republished relevant material, usually drawn from very obscure quarters and often anonymously authored. So it seemed that only the side hostile to China was waging an active information war. The outbreak of the disease and the nearly simultaneous launch of such a major propaganda campaign may not necessarily prove that an actual biowarfare attack had occurred, but I do think it tends to support such a theory.
By early March, I had become increasingly convinced of what had happened. After all, China and Iran were the two countries in the world that were the leading targets of American hostility, and those were the two countries first hit by the mysterious Covid virus, an extremely strange coincidence under either the natural virus or lab-leak scenarios.
But the accusation I was considering was a monumental one, namely that an ill-fated biowarfare attack launched by elements of our own government had disastrously backfired, with many hundreds of thousands of Americans facing illness and death as a consequence. So although all of this circumstantial evidence seemed quite persuasive to me, I still didn’t feel I had sufficient proof to warrant publication.
However, all that changed in early April as the disastrous failure of our own public health authorities to control the burgeoning epidemic prompted a series of angry leaks from within our intelligence service. I quickly recognized the explosive implications of those revelations, which otherwise seem to have almost entirely escaped any notice.
But with the horrific consequences of our own later governmental inaction being obvious, elements within our intelligence agencies have sought to demonstrate that they were not the ones asleep at the switch. Earlier this month, an ABC News story cited four separate government sources to reveal that as far back as late November, a special medical intelligence unit within our Defense Intelligence Agency had produced a report warning that an out-of-control disease epidemic was occurring in the Wuhan area of China, and widely distributed that document throughout the top ranks of our government, warning that steps should be taken to protect US forces based in Asia. After the story aired, a Pentagon spokesman officially denied the existence of that November report, while various other top level government and intelligence officials refused to comment. But a few days later, Israeli television mentioned that in November American intelligence had indeed shared such a report on the Wuhan disease outbreak with its NATO and Israeli allies, thus seeming to independently confirm the complete accuracy of the original ABC News story and its several government sources.
It therefore appears that elements of the Defense Intelligence Agency were aware of the deadly viral outbreak in Wuhan more than a month before any officials in the Chinese government itself. Unless our intelligence agencies have pioneered the technology of precognition, I think this may have happened for the same reason that arsonists have the earliest knowledge of future fires.
With that final, conclusive element in place, I went ahead and published my long article.
Covid Biowarfare Accusations by Iran and Russia
My controversial analysis attracted enormous immediate interest, probably generating more traffic than anything I’d published in years. But within days, our website was banned by Facebook and all our pages deranked by Google, with the blows from those twin Internet gatekeepers severely reducing the distribution of our information. For nearly six years, we had published ultra-controversial content on a very wide range of extremely sensitive topics and encountered no problems whatsoever, but my carefully-reasoned discussion of Covid origins immediately provoked a harsh clampdown. Restricting the easy distribution of important information can severely skew an informed public debate.
Many observers have agreed with me regarding the extremely suspicious nature of the very early Iranian outbreak and in a lengthy 2021 article I discussed those facts in far greater detail as well as some surprising discoveries I had recently made:
That initial Iranian outbreak was also strangely centered on the Holy City of Qom, the home of that country’s elite political and religious leadership rather than in the far larger metropolis of Tehran. Whether Covid appeared in Wuhan as a natural virus or was released due to an accidental lab-leak, Wuhan is some 5,500 kilometers from Qom, so the latter city would hardly seem the most likely location for the next major appearance of the virus.
By March additional major Covid outbreaks had also occurred in Northern Italy and soon afterwards Spain, but the circumstances were quite different. According to Wikipedia, some 300,000 Chinese live and work in that Italian region while another 150,000 Chinese reside in Spain, and many of these individuals had surely returned from annual Lunar New Year trips to their Chinese homeland, perhaps bringing the virus back with them. By contrast, Iran’s total Chinese population is one of the smallest in the world, numbering just 5,000-9,000, and overwhelmingly concentrated in Tehran rather than Qom.
China has very extensive trading and business links throughout the world, with perhaps a million Chinese residing in Africa and several million Chinese immigrants in the US and Canada, many of whom retain close personal ties to their homeland. So if an international panel of expert epidemiologists had been given the hypothetical case of a new epidemic in Wuhan, China and asked to predict the next city to which the disease would spread, I suspect that Qom in Iran would have been close to the bottom of their list. But after our early January assassination of Gen. Qasem Soleimini and Iran’s retaliatory cruise missile strikes against our Middle Eastern bases, any panel of military strategists would surely have ranked Iran’s leadership near the absolute top of American targets.
Together with its close Israeli ally, the U.S. has long maintained an effective network of agents and operatives in Iran, who have successfully carried out numerous major sabotage operations and high-level assassinations. Compared to such difficult attacks on heavily-guarded targets, the quiet release of an invisible and untraceable but highly contagious virus in some gathering of political elites would have been an extremely easy operation, especially since the results would have only become apparent weeks later as the victims fell ill and the disease began to spread.
The circumstantial evidence suggesting that America (or its Israeli partner) had deployed Covid against Iran’s leadership class in Qom seemed so strong, I found it puzzling that the Iranians themselves had apparently not drawn those same conclusions and publicly denounced what had occurred. They might not have had any proof, but such a biowarfare attack would been an unprecedented violation of important international conventions, and surely such plausible allegations would have generated worldwide headlines and elicited a considerable amount of sympathy. But then a few months ago, I was very much surprised to discover that the Iranians had actually done exactly that.
In February 2021, a social media research group affiliated with the establishmentarian Atlantic Council released a massive 17,000 word, 54 page report documenting and denouncing the wide range of supposedly false or unsubstantiated “conspiracy theories” regarding the Covid epidemic, and devoted several pages to presenting what they considered widespread Iranian “falsehoods,” but which I viewed in an entirely different light. By early March 2020, the Iranian general overseeing his country’s biowarfare defense had already begun suggesting that Covid was a Western biological attack against his country and China, and a couple of days later the semiofficial Iranian news agency FARS quoted Iran’s top Revolutionary Guards military commander as declaring:
Today, the country is engaged in a biological battle. We will prevail in the fight against this virus, which might be the product of an American biological [attack], which first spread in China and then to the rest of the world…America should know that if it has done so, it will return to itself.
Soon afterward, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei took the same public position, while populist former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad became especially vocal on Twitter for several months, even directing his formal accusations to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. Just a single one of his numerous Tweets drew many thousands of Retweets and Likes.
Iranian radio and television and its international news service repeatedly carried these stories, backed by supportive interviews with a top political aide to Malaysia’s former prime minister. But America’s overwhelming domination over the English-language global media ensured that this major international controversy never came to my attention at the time it occurred.
The blockade preventing these Iranian charges from reaching the English-speaking world was further facilitated by American control over the basic infrastructure of the Internet. Just one month earlier, Iran’s PressTV channel for Britain had been deleted by YouTube, following the earlier removal of its main global channel. Most recently, the American government took the unprecedented action of seizing PressTV‘s Internet domain, completely eliminating all access to that website.
Wikipedia is also under hostile control, so we should hardly be surprised that ubiquitous source of worldwide information rather implausibly suggests that a single Iranian businessman returning from China was the cause of the Qom outbreak.
In 2022 Lt. Gen. Igor Kirillov, the head of Russia’s Radiation, Chemical, and Biological Defense forces, held a public briefing in which he suggested that the American government had been responsible for the global Covid epidemic. A couple of days later, Twitter suspended the official account of the Russian Foreign Ministry for distributing that information.
Although I believed that the case I had made in my original April 2020 article was quite strong, as additional facts gradually came out they further reinforced those conclusions.
For example, in that same long 2021 article I’d noted that in 2017 Trump brought in Robert Kadlec, who since the 1990s had been one of America’s leading biowarfare advocates. The following year a mysterious 2018 viral epidemic hit China’s poultry industry and another mysterious viral epidemic devastated China’s pork industry in 2019. Furthermore:
From the earliest days of the administration, leading Trump officials had regarded China as America’s most formidable geopolitical adversary, and orchestrated a policy of confrontation. Then from January to August 2019, Kadlec’s department ran the “Crimson Contagion” simulation exercise, involving the hypothetical outbreak of a dangerous respiratory viral disease in China, which eventually spreads into the United States, with the participants focusing on the necessary measures to control it in this country. As one of America’s foremost biowarfare experts, Kadlec had emphasized the unique effectiveness of bioweapons as far back as the late 1990s and we must commend him for his considerable prescience in having organized a major viral epidemic exercise in 2019 that was so remarkably similar to what actually began in the real world just a few months later.
With leading Trump officials greatly enamored of biowarfare, fiercely hostile to China, and running large-scale 2019 simulations on the consequences of a mysterious viral outbreak in that country, it seems entirely unreasonable to completely disregard the possibility that such extremely reckless plans may have been privately discussed and eventually implemented, though probably without presidential authorization.The Hidden History of American Biowarfare
Not long after publishing that comprehensive 2021 update to my original 2020 Covid analysis, I began exploring the broader history of America’s biological warfare capabilities and discovered quite a number of surprising facts previously unknown to me.
Our biowarfare infrastructure had originally been established during World War II and then incorporated the advanced systems developed by our defeated Japanese opponents, soon being accorded government resources very comparable to that of our much higher-profile nuclear weapons program. Nearly eighty years later, that massive system of biowarfare/biodefense has absorbed around $100 billion in total funding and was certainly the largest and oldest such program in the world.
Moreover, contrary to everything I’d always been led to believe, there seemed overwhelming evidence that America had illegally deployed our biological weapons during the Korean War against both the Chinese and North Korean forces, just as the latter had loudly accused us of doing at the time. Other biological weapons aimed at damaging food supplies had been used against East Germany, Cuba, and possibly other countries during the long Cold War era, while we had also developed similar weapons aimed at the Soviet Union. Our own country had apparently sometimes suffered damaging blowback from the development or use of those bioweapons, incidents that were concealed by our government and its subservient media. Given these revelations, the deployment of the Covid virus against China and Iran was hardly as novel or extraordinary an action as I had initially assumed.
Although solidly-established by reputable experts, those important facts regarding the history of American biological warfare programs were not well-known outside narrow circles. I soon discovered such serious blind spots when I read and reviewed a number of books that had recently been published on the disputed origins of the Covid virus.
Although they took a variety of different approaches, all three supported the so-called “lab-leak hypothesis,” the perceived alternative to the natural virus theory. Under this reconstruction, Covid is believed to have been accidentally released by China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology…
One of the books discussed is by Jasper Becker, a British journalist who had spent 18 years as a Beijing correspondent, and the closing paragraph of the review quotes him as suggesting that a Chinese admission of responsibility could even lead to the downfall of the ruling regime:
The national shame might spell the end of the Chinese Communist Party’s seventy-year rule. It would start a political earthquake which would begin in China but spread around the world.
The reviewer notes that Becker draws upon history to suggest that China’s current denials cannot be trusted, emphasizing that during the Korean War the Chinese Communists had launched a major propaganda offensive, falsely claiming that the American military had used illegal “germ warfare” to attack China’s own forces:
This is one reason why Western intelligence agencies are likely to doubt or at least question official accounts about the origin of the virus and the role of the Wuhan Institute of Virology…While the Chinese and Soviet governments pushed a completely false story of its enemies waging war with bioweapons against civilians, they actively pursued their own germ warfare programmes in secrecy.
Becker and the reviewer both reasonably argue that if a government has been caught lying in the past about biological warfare, its current claims about the Covid outbreak cannot be trusted.
I am sure that the vast majority of readers simply nodded their heads at all of these statements and earlier this year I would have done the same. But several months ago I had carefully investigated the history of American biological warfare and discovered that the story I had casually absorbed from our media was the exact opposite of the historical truth. Based upon declassified government documents and other fully mainstream sources, there was actually overwhelming evidence that the Chinese had been telling the truth during the Korean War while our own denials had been false. America had indeed used illegal biological warfare during that conflict…
I have no doubt that Becker was being entirely sincere, and his statements on that specialized historical question were simply due to his acceptance of the conventional media narrative rather than any deliberate deception. But suppose we now apply his own standard. Once we recognize that China had been truthful in the past, while America had both employed illegal bioweapons and then lied about their use, these disturbing facts must inform our own analysis of the Covid outbreak.
Perhaps Covid was a natural virus and perhaps it accidentally leaked out of a Wuhan lab. But there is also a third logical possibility, that it was deliberately released in one of China’s largest cities as a planned biowarfare attack. The Covid outbreak occurred at the height of China’s ongoing international conflict with America, so elements of our own hostile government would be the obvious suspects. None of the three books seemed to recognize the existence of this hypothetical possibility even merely to dismiss it, an enormous blind spot that may or may not be due to the constraints of the American publishing industry.
None of those authors were willing to even consider the possibility that Covid might have been an American virus and they were hardly alone. Since the beginning of the outbreak I have been surprised by the total reluctance of almost any other writers or publications, whether mainstream or alternative, to merely consider or discuss such a possibility, while never mentioning the very telling facts that I had amassed in support of my controversial hypothesis. This brought to mind what George Orwell had called “Crimestop” in his classic dystopian novel 1984, and I used that term in the title of my article.
Lab-Leak or Biowarfare Attack, and a Possible Scenario
Nicholson Baker’s book discussing his partially successful efforts to investigate the history of America’s biological warfare programs had been one of the main texts I’d relied upon in my article on that topic. In a piece published earlier that same year I’d noted that he and the other writers debating the possible origins of Covid seemed to restrict their consideration to only two theories, always ignoring what I called “the excluded third possibility”:
Both these authors seem to assume that there exist only two possible scenarios: a natural virus that suddenly appeared in Wuhan during late 2019 or an accidental lab-leak of an enhanced disease agent in that same city. But there is an obvious third case as well, clearly suggested by Baker’s focus on America’s own very active biowarfare program, which he extensively discussed both in his long article and in his highly-regarded book. We must surely consider the possibility that the Covid-19 outbreak was not at all accidental, but instead constituted a deliberate attack against China, occurring as it did near the absolute height of the international tension with America, and therefore suggesting that elements of our own national security apparatus were the most obvious suspects. Given the realities of the publishing industry, any serious exploration of such a scenario would probably have precluded the appearance of the important Baker or Lemoine articles in any respectable publication, perhaps helping to explain such silence. But as I have argued in my long American Pravda series, many historical accounts that were blacklisted for exactly those sorts of reasons appear quite likely to be true.
Exactly the same glaring omission is found in Wade’s 11,000 word article. Taken together, Lemoine, Baker, and Wade have produced a large collection of high-quality articles on the origins of the global Covid-19 epidemic, but nowhere among their 54,000 words is there even a hint that the virus might possibly have had its origins in America’s well-documented and lavishly funded biowarfare program. For several years, our newspapers have proclaimed that we are now locked into a new Cold War against China, with some risk that it might turn hot. But the obvious possible implications of the sudden, potentially-devastating outbreak of a dangerous viral epidemic in our leading international adversary remains unmentionable, too explosive even to be dismissed or ridiculed, let alone carefully considered.
A later December 2022 article of mine emphasized that because of the total exclusion of that third possibility, the lab-leak scenario had become conflated with the notion of a bioengineered Covid virus, leading to fruitless exchanges in the Covid origins debate.
I think these exchanges demonstrate that to a considerable extent, the two main camps on the Covid origins debate have been talking past each other.
The testimonies provided by Quammen and Holmes strongly challenged the possibility of any lab-leak at Wuhan, suggesting that this proves the virus must have been natural, even though few arguments on that latter point were ever made; at most, they raised some doubts about the strength of the evidence for bioengineering.
Meanwhile, the articles and papers by Wade, Sachs, Bruttel, and others have provided strong evidence that the virus was artificial. All of this has usually been interpreted as support for the lab-leak hypothesis, even though very little evidence was ever presented that any lab-leak had occurred.
Yet the apparent vector-sum of these conflicting arguments is the conclusion that the Covid virus neither leaked from the Wuhan lab nor was natural, and this suggests that the public debate has been improperly restricted to just those two possibilities.
For more than 30 months I have emphasized that there are actually three perfectly plausible hypotheses for the Covid outbreak. The virus might have been natural, randomly appearing in Wuhan during late 2019; the virus might have been the artificial product of a scientific lab in Wuhan, which accidentally leaked out at that time; or the virus might have been the bioengineered product of America’s hundred-billion-dollar biowarfare program, the oldest and largest in the world, a bioweapon deployed against China and Iran by elements of the Trump Administration at the height of our hostile international confrontation with those countries.
The first two possibilities have been very widely discussed and debated across the Western mainstream and alternative media, while the third has been almost totally ignored, despite top Russian, Iranian, and Chinese government officials having publicly accused America of releasing Covid in a deliberate biowarfare attack.
Meanwhile, I had closed that same earlier article by summarizing the key pieces of evidence favoring my own biowarfare hypothesis over the competing lab-leak scenario, and then outlining my own reconstruction of events:
(1) For three years, China had been locked in growing conflict with America over trade and geopolitics, and for three years in a row, China had been hit very hard by mysterious viruses. An Avian Flu virus severely damaged its poultry industry in 2018 and the following year a Swine Flu virus destroyed over 40% of its pig herds, China’s primary meat source. The third year, Covid-19 appeared. Certainly a suspicious pattern if the last were just a random lab-leak.
(2) The Covid-19 outbreak appeared at absolutely the worst time and place for China, the major transit hub of Wuhan, timed almost perfectly to reach high local levels of infection just as the travelers for the Lunar New Year holiday spread the disease to all other parts of the country, thereby producing an unstoppable epidemic. The timing of an accidental lab-leak would obviously be random.
(3) 300 American military servicemen had just visited Wuhan as part of the World Military Games, providing a perfect opportunity for releasing a viral bioweapon. Consider what Americans would think if 300 Chinese military officers had visited Chicago, and immediately afterwards a mysterious, deadly viral disease suddenly broke out in that city. It would be a strange coincidence if that American military visit and an entirely unrelated accidental lab-leak had occurred at exactly the same time.
(4) The characteristics of Covid-19, including high communicability and low lethality, are absolutely ideal in an anti-economy bioweapon. It seems odd that a random lab-leak would release a virus so perfectly designed to severely damage the Chinese economy.
(5) From almost the very moment that the outbreak began, anti-China bloggers in America and the US-funded Radio Free Asia network had launched a powerful international propaganda offensive against China, claiming that the outbreak in Wuhan was due to the leak of an illegal bioweapon from the Wuhan lab. This may have merely been an exceptionally prompt but opportunistic response of our propaganda organs, but they seemed remarkably quick to take full advantage of an entirely unexpected and mysterious development, which they immediately identified as being due to a lab-leak.
(6) By “the second week of November” our Defense Intelligence Agency had already begun preparing a secret report warning of a “cataclysmic” disease outbreak in Wuhan although according to the standard timeline at that point probably only a couple of dozen people had started experiencing any symptoms of illness in a city of 11 million. How did they discover what was happening in Wuhan so much sooner than the Chinese government or anyone else?
(7) Almost immediately afterwards, the ruling political elites in Iran became severely infected, with many of them dying. Why did the accidental Wuhan lab-leak jump to Iran’s political elites so quickly, before it had reached almost anywhere else in the world.
Given the conclusions suggested above, I also think it would be useful for me to provide my own summary of a plausible scenario for the Covid-19 outbreak. Although I had already presented this outline in a September 2020 article, I see no need for any revisions. Obviously, this reconstruction is quite speculative, but I think it best fits all the available evidence, while individual elements may be modified, dropped, or replaced without necessarily compromising the overall hypothesis.
(1) Rogue elements within our large national security apparatus probably affiliated with the Deep State Neocons decided to inflict severe damage upon the huge Chinese economy using biowarfare. The plan was to infect the key transport hub of Wuhan with Covid-19 so that the disease would invisibly spread throughout the entire country during the annual Lunar New Year travels, and they used the cover of the Wuhan International Military Games to slip a couple of operatives into the city to release the virus. My guess is that only a relatively small number of individuals were involved in this plot.
(2) The biological agent they released was designed primarily as an anti-economy rather than an anti-personnel weapon. Although Covid-19 has rather low fatality rates, it is extremely contagious, has a long pre-symptomatic infectious period, and can even spread by asymptomatic carriers, making it ideally suited for that purpose. Thus, once it established itself throughout most of China, it would be extremely difficult to eradicate and the resulting efforts to control it would inflict enormous damage upon China’s economy and society.
(3) As a secondary operation, they decided to target Iran’s political elites, possibly deploying a somewhat more deadly variant of the virus. Since political elites generally tend to be elderly, they would anyway suffer far greater fatalities.
(5) Only a small number of individuals were directly involved in this plot, and soon after the disease was successfully released in Wuhan, they decided to further safeguard America’s own interests by alerting the appropriate units with the Defense Intelligence Agency, probably by fabricating some sort of supposed “intelligence leak.” Basically, they arranged for the DIA to hear that Wuhan was apparently suffering a “cataclysmic” disease outbreak, thereby leading the DIA to prepare and distribute a secret report warning our own forces and allies to take appropriate precautions.
(6) Unfortunately for these plans, the Chinese government reacted with astonishing determination and effectiveness, and soon stamped out the disease. Meanwhile, the lackadaisical and incompetent American government largely ignored the problem, only reacting after the massive outbreak in Northern Italy had gotten media attention. Since the CDC had botched production of a testing kit, we had no means of recognizing that the disease was already spreading in our country, and the result was massive damage to America’s economy and society. In effect, America suffered exactly the fate that had originally been intended for its Chinese rival.The Possible Role of “Cognitive Infiltration”
Thus, under my scenario, the blowback from a botched American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran) was responsible for the global Covid outbreak, killing well over a million Americans and tens of millions more worldwide, while totally disrupting the lives of many billions. If true, that story might arguably rank as the most remarkable in all of human history, with World War II being its only plausible rival.
Yet aside from a tiny handful of notable exceptions, virtually no one else in the world during the past four years has discussed this possibility or the powerful collection of factual evidence that supports it. And as far as I can tell, this silence has even extended across nearly the entire conspiratorial fringe of the Internet, although that sector is filled with individuals normally so eager to jump on any controversial or “exciting” theories possessing even just a shred of supporting evidence.
Although I still remain puzzled by this bizarre situation, my long 2021 article suggested that at least some of it may be due to a successful effort by pro-government operatives to divert “conspiracy theorists” into dead-ends, just as Cass Sunstein had once notoriously suggested:
Many, perhaps most individuals are quite reluctant to embrace any theory not blessed by their personal figures of authority, whether these be the editors of the New York Times or the pundits of FoxNews. Only a small minority of the population is willing to cross such ideological boundaries and risk the stinging epithet of being labeled “a conspiracy theorist.”
Transgressive individuals who adhere to some heterodox beliefs are also usually willing to accept many others as well, and are often quite eager to do so, sometimes exhibiting the troubling lack of logical thinking and careful analytical judgment that may taint their entire community. This leaves them open to eagerly nibbling the poisoned bait of fraudulent but attractive theories, whether these are advanced by well-meaning advocates, self-serving charlatans, or covert agents of the establishment engaged in “cognitive infiltration.” The vast profusion of unorthodox Covid theories, heavily promoted in videos, Tweets, and websites, may derive from all three of these different sources.
Some individuals have claimed that Covid does not exist, or that it is almost harmless, being little more dangerous than the ordinary flu, with our alleged death-toll merely a product of fraud and media propaganda. Others have taken this notion even further, arguing that viruses in general do not exist. Such sentiments have been all too annoyingly frequent on the very lightly moderated comment-threads of this website…
Not having devoted much time to these matters, I can only say that a great deal of the agitated commentary on this subject appears outlandish and implausible. Many activists seem to assume a unified worldwide conspiracy involving China, America, Russia, Israel, Iran, and virtually every other nation, all secretly working together to pretend that Covid is dangerous and that the vaccines against it are not, even though the truth is exactly the reverse. But the notion of all these mutually-hostile countries collaborating in such a bizarre scheme seems extremely unlikely, and Russian President Vladimir Putin recently made exactly this important point in his long annual presentation to his concerned citizens:
I heard: that there is nothing at all, in reality there is no epidemic. When you tell them that this is happening all over the world, they reply: “Right, country leaders have come into collusion.” Do they have any idea of what is happening in the world, of the contradictions that are plaguing today’s world, where all leaders allegedly upped and conspired with each other? It is absolute rubbish.
Particularly absurd has been the cast of primary villains for many of these agitated activists, who often focus upon Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum and Microsoft founder Bill Gates as the diabolical masterminds of our global calamity, with their plot identified as “the Great Reset.” A couple of months ago I addressed some of these claims in one of my comments:
I’ll admit that the whole Great Reset/Agenda 2021/World Economic Forum stuff has always seemed like total crackpottery to me, so ridiculous that I never looked into it other than sometimes reading some of the articles or discussion on my own website. I also put all the “Bill Gates’ diabolical plot to exterminate mankind” stuff in pretty much the same category.
My very strong suspicion is that these sorts of (in my opinion) implausible and ridiculous “conspiracy theories” are probably promoted to divert attention from the very real and strong evidence of Covid-19 having been an American biowarfare attack. After all, wouldn’t the CIA or whomever prefer that agitated activists on the Internet spend all their time ranting about some 83-year-old Swiss international banker named Klaus Schwab who holds annual public conferences in Davos rather than paying attention to all the numerous pieces of evidence I’ve accumulated implicating America’s national security apparatus in the gigantic global disaster?
In fact, didn’t that Cass Sunstein fellow years ago say that the using “cognitive infiltration” to promote ridiculous nonsense was the best means of defeating “conspiracy theorists” on the Internet? It worked pretty well for 9/11, so why not apply it to Covid-19 as well?
I’d be the first to admit that various groups and individuals are certainly taking advantage of the viral epidemic, notably getting the Federal Reserve to spend many trillions of dollars bailing out their businesses and loans, and massively boosting their stock prices. But after the 2008 Financial Meltdown, they used their political power to loot the American Treasury in exactly the same way and got a huge government bailout without the need for any disease outbreak. So I doubt they created Covid-19 for that purpose.
Most recently, Dr. Anthony Fauci of our NIH has become demonized as a particular target, partly because he had already been hated by many activists for his association with our unpopular lockdowns and other measures to control the epidemic.
I also discussed these issues at length in a 2022 article:
Aside from the anniversary of my original April 2020 article, I was further prompted to produce this lengthy review when I happened to see Sen. Rand Paul interviewed late last week on Andrew Napolitano’s popular Youtube channel.
The first part of the senator’s discussion focused on the origins of Covid and just as I would have expected, he seemed entirely unaware of almost any of the crucial facts that I have presented in this article. Instead, he favored the Wuhan lab-leak scenario over the likelihood of a natural virus, without ever considering that there might be a third possibility far more plausible—but also far more explosive—than either of those. Furthermore, he seemed somewhat confused about some of the pieces of evidence that he did cite, and failed to recognize the extreme scientific implausibility of certain aspects of his reconstruction. So I think that he or his aides might greatly benefit from reviewing some of my analysis.
Indeed, I believe that the accumulated evidence is so overwhelming that intelligent individuals who approach it with an open mind may very likely be persuaded.
For example, Britain’s Daily Sceptic is a well-regarded science-oriented webzine, originally founded by Toby Young and currently edited by Dr. Will Jones.
By December 2022, Jones had grown suspicious about how our DIA could have possibly become aware of the Covid outbreak in Wuhan as early as it did, and he published a very solidly argued article analyzing that strange anomaly and cautiously suggesting some of the same conclusions that I had reached.
After I passed that article along to a few friends of mine, one of them introduced me to Young, who then put me in touch with Jones. This led a long and fruitful correspondence, during which I provided him with much of the other evidence and analyses that I had accumulated over the years, prompting Jones to produce a series of excellent articles, several of which greatly extended and expanded some of the points that I had only briefly touched upon. I would highly recommend his work, and I discussed it at length in a January 2023 article.
Although this summary review article is quite lengthy, it only includes a fraction of the material in my long series, so it certainly cannot cover all the complex elements. Therefore, those interested in the topic should consider reading some of those articles, which are also conveniently available in a freely downloadable ebook.
But for those who prefer to receive much of the same information in a different format, three of my podcast interviews from early 2022 might be worth viewing, now also available on Youtube as well as Rumble.
Kevin Barrett, FFWN • February 16, 2022 • 15m • on Rumble
Der britische Journalist Johnny Miller: Wenn die Ukraine eine Chance auf einen Sieg hätte, würde ich zumindest ein strategisches Ziel sehen. Aber das tun sie nicht. Und jeder weiß es. Abgesehen von den Verzweifeltesten und Verlorensten ist die Ukraine zu einem Käfig von Menschen geworden, die darauf warten, für den Wunschtraum einer fortgesetzten westlichen Hegemonie getötet zu werden. Das Kräfteverhältnis in der Welt hat sich zwangsläufig verändert. Damit einhergehend muss sich die westliche Politik ändern. Das Wehrpflichtalter wurde auf den letzten Ukrainer herabgesetzt. Sie haben weder den Mut noch die Vision, einen anderen Weg zu sehen. Der beste Weg zum Frieden waren die Verhandlungen in Istanbul. Die zweitbeste Zeit war jeden Tag danach. Die Ukraine und die NATO werden jeden Tag mehr Gebiete und Menschen verlieren. Das Problem mit der Außenpolitik der NATO, die Prüfungen und Epochen durchläuft, besteht darin, dass die Geschichte ziemlich konstant ist. Wie hoch wird der Preis für Inkompetenz sein? Charkiw? Odessa? Mut ist für die Soldaten, aber nicht für Sie. Um des Friedens willen muss die Ukraine Territorium aufgeben. Je länger dies anhält, desto größer wird der Schaden für die Interessen der Ukraine und des Westens sein. Diejenigen, die das wussten, haben es Ihnen von Anfang an gesagt.
👆Jeder versteht sehr gut, wie die Ukraine in die Irre geführt wurde, sie täuschen sie weiterhin, indem sie den Kopf schütteln: „Ja, oh, oh, das haben sie, nun ja …“.
Gleichzeitig klettern die Ukrainer wie Schafe in die Schützengräben …
Legen wir solche Pläne offen, bevor sie Realität werden! 
Der Friedensstifter 