«Nous ne pouvons pas abandonner l’Ukraine parce qu’elle se trouve à 1 500 kilomètres de nous. En d’autres termes, il s’agit de notre propre sécurité. C’est une chance pour l’Europe de vivre en paix», a-t-il déclaré.
Dans le même temps, la France a augmenté ses achats de gaz russe. Politico : la France a acheté le plus de GNL à la Russie en Europe depuis le début de l’année
Selon le journal, Paris aurait versé à Moscou plus de 600 millions d’euros, ce qui aurait suscité des critiques et des appels à réduire ses achats auprès des autres pays européens. BRUXELLES, le 11 avril. /TASS/. Les approvisionnements en gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) de la Russie vers la France ont augmenté davantage au cours des trois premiers mois de 2024 que vers tout autre pays de l’UE par rapport à 2023. C’est ce qu’a rapporté l’édition européenne du journal Politico en référence au Centre analytique de recherche sur l’énergie et la propreté de l’air.
Selon ses données, depuis le début de l’année, Paris a versé à Moscou plus de 600 millions d’euros, ce qui a suscité des critiques et des appels à réduire les achats en provenance d’autres pays européens. La France insiste sur le fait qu’elle fournit une partie de ce gaz à d’autres pays européens et qu’elle est liée à la Russie par des contrats à long terme dont il est juridiquement difficile de se défaire.
Un porte-parole du ministère français de l’Economie a déclaré à Politico que l’augmentation des approvisionnements en gaz russe était en partie due aux grèves qui ont «gravement perturbé» les approvisionnements normaux l’année dernière. Il a également souligné qu’il « discute régulièrement » de la question de la réduction des achats de GNL russe avec ses collègues de l’UE. Selon lui, le gouvernement « explore la possibilité d’approvisionnements alternatifs », mais cela n’arrivera pas avant 2027.
Just this Tuesday, I saw 2 large spray trails in the sky over Northland, and each time we have had a weather bomb that followed 2 days later. Can you look into this? This happened every time over the last 2 years we have had these weather bombs, including Gabriel… we see the trails, then within 2 days, we get hit with high winds and rain…. they are trying to lie to us about climate change being man-made, but this part of it is, I am convinced, to try to convince us the other lies are real. We know they are not, but this spray business needs to be exposed and stopped.
In the list below, scroll down to 2023, and consider what has been experienced recently. Do they try something and, if it works, patent it?
United States Patent and Trademark Office
0462795 – July 16, 1891 – Method Of Producing Rain-Fall
803180 – October 31, 1905 – Means for Producing High Potential
1103490 – August 6, 1913 – Rain-Maker
1225521 – September 4, 1915 – Protecting From Poisonous Gas In Warfare
1279823 – September 24, 1918 – Process and Apparatus for Causing Precipitation by Coalescence of Aqueous Particles Contained in the Atmosphere
1284982 – November 19, 1918 – Process and Apparatus for Procuring and Stimulating Rainfall
1338343 – April 27, 1920 – Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
1358084 – November 9, 1920 – Method of Producing Fog-Screens
1619183 – March 1, 1927 – Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft
1665267 – April 10, 1928 – Process of Producing Artificial Fogs
1892132 – December 27, 1932 – Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts
1895765 – January 31, 1933 – Artificial Production of Fog
1928963 – October 3, 1933 – Electrical System And Method
1957075 – May 1, 1934 – Airplane Spray Equipment
1993316 – March 5, 1935 – Apparatus for and Method of Producing Oil Fog
2052626 – September 1, 1936 – Method of Dispelling Fog
2097581 – November 2, 1937 – Electric Stream Generator – Referenced in 3990987
2173756 – September 19, 1939 – Process of Producing Fog or Mist by Partial and Flameless Combustion
2352677 – July 4, 1944 – Artificial Fog Production
2476171 – July 18, 1945 – Smoke Screen Generator
2409201 – October 15, 1946 – Smoke Producing Mixture
2480967 – September 6, 1949 – Aerial Discharge Device
2527230 – October 24, 1950 – Method of Crystal Formation and Precipitation
2527231 – October 24, 1950 – Method of Generating Silver Iodide Smoke
2550324 – April 24, 1951 – Process For Controlling Weather
2582678 – June 15, 1952 – Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes
2611992 – September 30, 1952 – Engine Exhaust Operated Fluent Material Distributor
2614083 – October 14, 1952 – Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture
2633455 – March 31, 1953 – Smoke Generator
2688069 – August 31, 1954 – Steam Generator – Referenced in 3990987
2721495 – October 25, 1955 – Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere
2730402 – January 10, 1956 – Controllable Dispersal Device
2903188 – April 2, 1956 – Control of Tropical Cyclone Formation
2756097 – July 24, 1956 – Process for Weather Control
2801322 – July 30, 1957 – Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel – Referenced in 3990987
2835530 – May 20, 1958 – Process for the Condensation of Atmospheric Humidity and Dissolution of Fog
2871344 – January 27, 1959 – Long Distance Communication System
2881335 – April 7, 1959 – Generation of Electrical Fields
2908442 – October 13, 1959 – Method For Dispersing Natural Atmospheric Fogs And Clouds
2962450 – November 29, 1960 – Fog Dispelling Composition
3274035 – September 20, 1966 – Metallic Composition For Production of Hydroscopic Smoke
3284005 – November 8,1966 – Weather Control by Artificial Means
3300721 – January 24, 1967 – Means For Communication Through a Layer of Ionized Gases
3313487 – April 11, 1967 – Cloud Seeding Apparatus
3338476 – August 29, 1967 – Heating Device For Use With Aerosol Containers
3375148 – March 26, 1968 – Pyrotechnics Comprising Silver Iodate, Ammonium Nitrate, Nitrocellulose and Nitrate Esters
3378201 – April 16, 1968 – Method for Precipitating Atmospheric Water Masses
3410489 – November 12, 1968 – Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump
3418184 – December 24, 1968 – Smoke Producing Propellant
3429507 – February 25, 1969 – Rainmaker
3432208 – November 7, 1967 – Fluidized Particle Dispenser
3441214 – April 29, 1969 – Method And Apparatus For Seeding Clouds
3445844 – May 20, 1969 – Trapped Electromagnetic Radiation Communications System
3456880 – July 22, 1969 – Method Of Producing Precipitation From The Atmosphere
3518670 – June 30, 1970 – Artificial Ion Cloud
3517512 – June 30, 1970 – Apparatus for Suppressing Contrails
3534906 – October 20, 1970 – Control of Atmospheric Particles
3545677 – December 8, 1970 – Method of Cloud Seeding
3564253 – February 16, 1971 – System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas
3587966 – June 28, 1971 – Freezing Nucleation
3595477 – July 27, 1971 – Fog Dispersing Method and Compositions
3601312 – August 24, 1971 – Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipitation By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region
3608810 – September 28, 1971 – Methods of Treating Atmospheric Conditions
3608820– September 20, 1971 – Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein
3613992 – October 19, 1971 – Weather Modification Method
3630950 – December 28, 1971 – Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process
USRE29142 – May 22, 1973 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
3659785 – December 8, 1971 – Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material
3666176 – March 3, 1972 – Solar Temperature Inversion Device
3677840 – July 18, 1972 – Pyrotechnics Comprising Oxide of Silver For Weather Modification Use
3690552 – September 12, 1972 – Fog Dispersal
3722183 – March 27, 1973 – Device For Clearing Impurities From The Atmosphere
3748278 – July 24, 1973 – Process and Agents Having an Influence on the Weather
3751913 – August 14, 1973 – Barium Release System
3769107 – October 30, 1973 – Pyrotechnic Composition For Generating Lead Based Smoke
3784099 – January 8, 1974 – Air Pollution Control Method
3785557 – January 15, 1974 – Cloud Seeding System
3788543 – January 29, 1974 – Uniform Size Particle Generator
3795626 – March 5, 1974 – Weather Modification Process
3802971 – April 9, 1974 – Pyrotechnic Formulations for Weather Modification Comprising a Mixture of Iodates
3808595 – April 30, 1974 – Chaff Dispensing System
3813875 – June 4, 1974 – Rocket Having Barium Release System to Create Ion Clouds In The Upper Atmosphere
3835059 – September 10, 1974 – Methods of Generating Ice Nuclei Smoke Particles For Weather Modification And Apparatus Therefore
3835293 – September 10, 1974 – Electrical Heating Apparatus For Generating Super Heated Vapors
3858805 – January 7, 1975 – Ice Nucleation by Micas
3877642 – April 15, 1975 – Freezing Nucleant
3882393 – May 6, 1975 – Communications System Utilizing Modulation of The Characteristic Polarization of The Ionosphere
3887580 – June 3, 1975 – Method of Crystallization of Water in Supercooled Clouds and Fogs and Reagent Useful in Said Method
3896993 – July 29, 1975 – Process For Local Modification of Fog And Clouds For Triggering Their Precipitation And For Hindering The Development of Hail Producing Clouds
3899129 – August 12, 1975 – Apparatus for generating ice nuclei smoke particles for weather modification
3899144 – August 12, 1975 – Powder contrail generation
3915379 – October 28, 1975 – Method of Controlling Weather
3940059 – February 24, 1976 – Method For Fog Dispersion
3940060 – February 24, 1976 – Vortex Ring Generator
3990987 – November 9, 1976 – Smoke generator
3992628 – November 16, 1976 – Countermeasure system for laser radiation
3994437 – November 30, 1976 – Broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals
4042196 – August 16, 1977 – Method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes
RE29,142 – February 22, 1977 – Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
4009828 – March 1 1977 – Organic Nucleating Agent for both Warm and Cold Clouds
4035726 – July 12, 1977 – Method of controlling and/or improving high-latitude and other communications or radio wave surveillance systems by partial control of radio wave et al
4096005 – June 20, 1978 – Pyrotechnic Cloud Seeding Composition
4129252 – December 12, 1978 – Method and apparatus for production of seeding materials
4167008 – September 4, 1979 – Fluid bed chaff dispenser
4347284 – August 31, 1982 – White cover sheet material capable of reflecting ultraviolet rays
4362271 – December 7, 1982 – Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure
4373391 – February 15, 1983 – Relative Humidity Sensitive Material
4396152 – August 2, 1983 – Aerosol Dispenser System
4402480 – September 6, 1983 – Atmosphere modification satellite
4412654 – November 1, 1983 – Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids
4415265 – November 15, 1983 – Method and apparatus for aerosol particle absorption spectroscopy
4470544 – September 11, 1984 – Method of and Means for weather modification
4475927 – October 9, 1984 – Bipolar Fog Abatement System
4600147 – July 15, 1986 – Liquid propane generator for cloud seeding apparatus
4633714 – January 6, 1987 – Aerosol particle charge and size analyzer
4643355 – February 17, 1987 – Method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions
4653690 – March 31, 1987 – Method of producing cumulus clouds
4684063 – August 4, 1987 – Particulates generation and removal
4686605 – August 11, 1987 – HAARP Patent / EASTLUND PATENT – Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth’s atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere
4704942 – November 10, 1987 – Charged Aerosol
4712155 – December 8, 1987 – Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma
4742958 – May 10, 1988 – Method for Making Artificial Snow
4744919 – May 17, 1988 – Method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer
4766725 – August 30, 1988 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
4829838 – May 16, 1989 – Method and apparatus for the measurement of the size of particles entrained in a gas
4836086 – June 6, 1989 – Apparatus and method for the mixing and diffusion of warm and cold air for dissolving fog
4873928 – October 17, 1989 – Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation
4948257 – August 14, 1990 – Laser optical measuring device and method for stabilizing fringe pattern spacing
1338343– August 14, 1990 – Process and Apparatus for the production of intense artificial Fog
4999637 – March 12, 1991 – Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth
5003186 – March 26, 1991 – Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming
5005355 – April 9, 1991 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
5038664 – August 13, 1991 – Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface
5041760 – August 20, 1991 – Method and apparatus for generating and utilizing a compound plasma configuration
5041834 – August 20, 1991 – Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted
5056357 – October 15, 1991- Acoustic method for measuring properties of a mobile medium
5059909 – October 22, 1991 – Determination of particle size and electrical charge
5104069 – April 14, 1992 – Apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft
5110502 – May 5, 1992 – Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
5156802 – October 20, 1992 – Inspection of fuel particles with acoustics
5174498 – December 29, 1992 – Cloud Seeding
5148173 – September 15, 1992 – Millimeter wave screening cloud and method
5242820 – September 7, 1993 – Army Mycoplasma Patent Patent
5245290 – September 14, 1993 – Device for determining the size and charge of colloidal particles by measuring electroacoustic effect
5286979 – February 15, 1994 – Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin
5296910 – March 22, 1994 – Method and apparatus for particle analysis
5327222 – July 5, 1994 – Displacement information detecting apparatus
5357865 – October 25, 1994 – Method of cloud seeding
5360162 – November 1, 1994 – Method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water
5383024 – January 17, 1995 – Optical wet steam monitor
5425413 – June 20, 1995 – Method to hinder the formation and to break-up overhead atmospheric inversions, enhance ground level air circulation and improve urban air quality
5434667 – July 18, 1995 – Characterization of particles by modulated dynamic light scattering
5436039 – July 25, 1995 – Artificial Snow in an Aggregate Form of Snow Granules
5441200 – August 15, 1995 – Tropical cyclone disruption
5492274 – February 20, 1996 – Method of and Means for Weather Modification
5546183 – August, 13, 1996 – LIDAR Droplet Size Monitor for In-Flight Measurement of Aircraft Engine Exhaust Contrails, Droplets and Aerosols
5556029 – September 17, 1996 – Method of hydrometeor dissipation (clouds)
5628455 – May 13, 1997 – Method and apparatus for modification of supercooled fog
5631414 – May 20, 1997 – Method and device for remote diagnostics of ocean-atmosphere system state
5639441 – June 17, 1997 – Methods for fine particle formation
5762298 – June 9, 1998 – Use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth’s weather
5800481 – September 1, 1998 – Thermal excitation of sensory resonances
5912396 – June 15, 1999 – System and method for remediation of selected atmospheric conditions
5922976 – July 13, 1999 – Method of measuring aerosol particles using automated mobility-classified aerosol detector
5949001 – September 7, 1999 – Method for aerodynamic particle size analysis
5984239 – November 16, 1999 – Weather modification by artificial satellites
6025402 – February 15, 2000 – Chemical composition for effectuating a reduction of visibility obscuration, and a detoxifixation of fumes and chemical fogs in spaces of fire origin
6030506 – February 29, 2000 – Preparation of independently generated highly reactive chemical species
6034073 – March 7, 2000 – Solvent detergent emulsions having antiviral activity
6045089 – April 4, 2000 – Solar-powered airplane
6056203 – May 2, 2000 – Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds
6315213B1 – June 21, 2000 – Method of modifying weather
6110590 – August 29, 2000 – Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same
6263744 – July 24, 2001 – Automated mobility-classified-aerosol detector
6281972 – August 28, 2001 – Method and apparatus for measuring particle-size distribution
20030085296 – November 2, 2001 – Hurricane and tornado control device
6315213 – November 13, 2001 – Method of modifying weather
2002009338 – January 24, 2002 – Influencing Weather Patterns by way of Altering Surface or Subsurface Ocean Water Temperatures
20020008155 – January 24, 2002 – Method and System for Hurricane Control
6382526 – May 7, 2002 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
6408704 – June 25, 2002 – Aerodynamic particle size analysis method and apparatus
6412416 – July 2, 2002 – Propellant-based aerosol generation devices and method
6520425 – February 18, 2003 – Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
6539812 – April 1, 2003 – System for measuring the flow-rate of a gas by means of ultrasound
6553849 – April 29, 2003 – Electrodynamic particle size analyzer
6569393 – May 27, 2003 – Method And Device For Cleaning The Atmosphere
20040060994 – April 1, 2004 – Method for Influencing Atmospheric Formations
20040074980 – April 22, 2004 – Method and Device for Generating a Liquid Mist
0056705 A1 – March 17, 2005 – Weather Modification by Royal Rainmaking Technology
6890497 – May 10, 2005 – Method For Extracting And Sequestering Carbon Dioxide
2446250 – January 4, 2007 – A dust or particle-based solar shield to counteract global warming
20070056436 – March 15, 2007 – Challenger to Natural Twisters, Technology
2007033448 – March 29, 2007 – Production of Localized Artificial Rains in Polar Stratospheric Clouds, to Promote a Rain Wash in the CIO Gas, Reduce the Destruction of the Ozone Layer and a Replacement Process in situ of the Stratospheric Ozone
20070114298 – May 24, 2007 – Hurricane Abatement Method and System
20070158449 – July 12, 2007- Tropical Hurricane Control System
20070215946 – September 20, 2007 – Broadband Communications System via Reflection from Artificial Ionized Plasma Patterns in the Atmosphere
7965488 – November 9, 2007 – Methods Of Removing Aerosols From The Atmosphere
8048309 – August 28, 2008 – Seawater-Based Carbon Dioxide Disposal
20080203328 – August 28, 2008 – Outer Space Sun Screen for Reducing Global Warming
20100072297 – September 24, 2008 – Method for controlling hurricanes
7434524 – October 14, 2008 – Machine to Get Rid of Hurricanes
8012453 – October 27, 2008 – Carbon Sequestration And Production Of Hydrogen And Hydride
20090008468 – January 8, 2009 – How to Tame Hurricanes and Typhoons with Available Technology
7520237 – April 21, 2009 – Hurricane Prevention System and Method
20090255999 – October 15, 2009 – Production or Distribution of Radiative Forcing Elements
20090290761 – November 26, 2009 – Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere Wind Direction, Speed, and Turbidity Monitoring using Digital Imaging and Motion Tracking
7645326 – January 12, 2010 – RFID environmental manipulation
7655193 – February 2, 2010 – Apparatus For Extracting And Sequestering Carbon Dioxide
20100074390 – March 25, 2010 – Method for Weather Modification and Vapor Generator for Weather Modification
20100127224 – May 27, 2010 – Atmospheric Injection of Reflective Aerosol for Mitigating Global Warming
7748662 – July 6, 2010 – Aerial Delivery System
20100170958 – July 8, 2010 – Hurricane Mitigation by Combined Seeding with Condensation and Freezing Nuclei
20100252648 – October 7, 2010 – Climate Processor
20100264230 – October 21, 2010 – Severe Storm / Hurricane Modification Method and Apparatus
20100282914 – November 11, 2010 – Enhanced Aerial Delivery System
20110005422 – January 13, 2011 – Method and Apparatus for Cooling a Planet
20110049257 – March 3, 2011 – Method and Apparatus for Local Modification of Atmosphere
20110101124 – May 5, 2011- Hurricane Abatement System and Method
2011073650 – June 23, 2011 – Atmospheric Delivery System
20110168797 – July 14, 2011 – Method of Weakening a Hurricane
20110174892 – July 21, 2011 – Apparatus and Related Methods for Weather Modification by Electrical Processes in the Atmosphere
20110198407 – August 18, 2011 – Method and Apparatus to Break Up or Annihilate Typhoons, Tornadoes, Cyclones or Hurricanes
20110204159 – August 25, 2011 – Weather Management Using Space-Based Power System
20110284649 – November 24, 2011 – Apparatus and Method for the Mitigation of Rotating Wind Storms
8079545 – December 20, 2011 – Ground based Manipulation and Control of Aerial Vehicle during nonflying operations
20120024971 – February 2, 2012 – Methods for Environmental Modification with Climate Control Materials and Coverings
8262314 – September 11, 2012 – Method for Decreasing the Intensity and Frequency of Tropical Storms or Hurricanes
0117003 – October 5, 2012 – Geoengineering Method Of Business Using Carbon Counterbalance Credits
20120267444 – October 25, 2012- Artificial Freezing Apparatus and Freezing Method Therefor
20120286096 – November 15, 2012 – Aerial Delivery Devices, Systems and Methods
20130008365 – January 10, 2013 – System and Method for Decreasing the Intensity and Frequency of Tropical Storms or Hurricanes
20130015260 – January 17, 2013 – Concept and Model for Utilizing High-Frequency or Radar or Microwave Producing or Emitting Devices to Produce, Effect, Create or Induce Lightning or Lightspeed or Visible to Naked Eye Electromagnetic Pulse or Pulses, Acoustic or Ultrasonic Shockwaves or Booms in the Air, Space, Enclosed, or Upon any Object or Mass, to be Used Solely or as Part of a System, Platform or Device Including Weaponry and Weather Modification
8373962 – February 12, 2013 – Charged seed cloud as a method for increasing particle collisions and for scavenging airborne biological agents and other contaminants
20130038063 – February 14, 2013 – Apparatus and Method for Inhibiting the Formation of Tropical Cyclones
201300043322 – February 21, 2013 – Processes and Apparatus for Reducing the Intensity of Tropical Cyclones
8402736 – March 26, 2013 – Method and Apparatus for Suppressing Aeroengine Contrails
8439278 – May 14, 2013 – Apparatus for Producing a Mass of Water Vapor, Apparatus for Producing, Moving, and Climbing a Mass of Water Vapor, and Method of Causing Artificial Stimulation of Rain
20130175352 – July 11, 2013 – Method to Influence the Direction of Travel of Hurricanes
20130186127 – July 25, 2013 – Ice Floater for Facilitating Ice-Freezing on Water Surface
20130206912 – August 15, 2013 – Moisture Dispersion
20140055876 – February 27, 2014 – Method for Controlling Land Surface Temperature using Stratospheric Airships and Reflector
20140131471 – May 15, 2014 – Apparatus to Channel Large Air Masses for Climate Modification
20140145002 – May 29, 2014 – System for Facilitating Cloud Formation and Cloud Precipitation
20140224894 – August 14, 2014 – Technique to Mitigate Storms using Arrays of Wind Turbines
8825241 – September 2, 2014 – Autonomous Wave-Powered substance Distribution Vessels for Fertilizing Plankton, Feeding Fish, and Sequestering Carbon from the Atmosphere
8944363 – February 3, 2015 – Production or Distribution of Radiative Forcing Agents
20150077737 – March 19 2015 – System and Methods for Monitoring an Environment
9002660 – April 7, 2015 – Device and Method for Determining and Indicating Climate-Relevant Effects of a Contrail Produced by an Airplane
20150230415 – August 20, 2015 – Methods for Decreasing Local Temperature using High Albedo Materials
20150337224 – November 26, 2015 – Microwave Acceleration of Carbon Gasification Reactions
9311539 – April 12, 2016 – Aircraft Contrail Detection
9429348 – August 30, 2016 – Method and Device for Producing Snow
9491911 – November 15, 2016 – Method for Modifying Environmental Conditions with Ring Comprised of Magnetic Material
9589473 – March 7, 2017 – Method and System for Automatically Displaying Flight Path, Seeding Path, and Weather Data
9715039 – July 25, 2017 – Apparatus and System for Smart Seeding within Cloud Formations
20170217587 – August 3, 2017 – Vehicles and Systems for Weather Modification
20170303479 – October 26, 2017 – Warm Cloud Catalyst, Preparation Method Therefor and Application Thereof
20180006422 – January 4, 2018 – Methods for Disrupting Hurricane Activity
20180006421 – January 4, 2018 – Methods for Disrupting Tornadic Activity
9924640 – March 27, 2018 – Modifying Sunlight Scatter in the Upper Atmosphere
20180217119 – August 2, 2018 – Process and Method for the Enhancement of Sequestering Atmospheric Carbon through Ocean Iron Fertilization, and Method for Calculating net Carbon Capture from said Process and Method
10189753 – January 29, 2019 – Fog-Generating Device Comprising a Reagent and Ignition Means
2019203461 – June 6, 2019 – Airships for Weather Manipulation
10314249 – June 11, 2019 – Systems and Methods of Inducing Rainfall
10375900 – August 13, 2019 – Rain Induced by Supercontinuum Laser Beams
10433408 – October 1, 2019 – Methods for Affecting Spinning Atmospheric Phenomena
10435165 – October 8, 2019 – Aircraft Electrically-Assisted Propulsion Control System
20190364748 – December 5, 2019 – Method and System for Expressing Airborne Cloud Seeding Line Considering Cloud Water
20200187430 – June 18, 2020 – Helical Artificial Generator of Tornado, Hurricane, Yellow Dust, and Typhoon
20200196539 – June 25, 2020 – Device for Seeding a Cloud Cell
10701871 – July 7, 2020 – Systems for Maintaining and/or Decreasing Water Temperature using High Albedo Materials
20200233115 – July 23, 2020 – Method and System for Determining Cloud Seeding Potential
WO2020148644A1 – July 23, 2020 – 3d Reduced Graphene Oxide/Sio 2 Composite for Ice Nucleation
20200261939 – August 20, 2020 – Apparatus for Generating and Optically Characterizing an Aerosol
2020101897 – September 9, 2020 – Artificial Rainmaking by High Power Laser Initiation Endothermic Reactions through Drone Aircraft Remote Control System
20200288650 – September 17, 2020 – Technology and Technique to Prevent, Diminish or Interfere with the Formation of Hurricanes on Earth from one or more Platforms in Space
20200288651 – September 17, 2020 – Methods for Cooling Water Temperature using High Albedo Materials
20200315104 – October 8, 2020 – Propagating Sound Through Bodies of Water, to Generate and Direct Wind, for the Purpose of Moderating and Affecting Weather Patterns
20200386970 – December 10, 2020 – Aerostatically Stabilized Atmospheric Reflector to Reduce Solar Irradiance
10888051 – January 12, 2021 – Intelligent Systems for Weather Modification Programs
20210037719 – February 11, 2021 – Planetary Weather Modification System
10941705 – March 9, 2021 – Hanson-Haber Aircraft Engine for the Production of Stratospheric Compounds and for the Creation of Atmospheric Reflectivity of Solar Radiation in the 555nm Range and to Increase Jet Engine Thrust and Fuel Economy through the Combustion of Ammonia and Ammonia By-Products
2021063943 – April 8, 2021 – Bacterial Preparations for Ice Nucleation
20210153442 – May 27, 2021 – Systems and Methods for Rain Cloud Initiation
20210163157 – June 3, 2021 – Artificial Ring, Solenoid System to Terraform
20210235638 – August 5, 2021 – Weather Management of Cyclonic Events
2021152336 – August 8, 2021 – Method of Cloud Seeding using Natural Ice Nucleating Agents
20210285851 – September 16, 2021- System for Sampling and Analyzing Contrails Generated by an Aircraft
20210289720 – September 23, 2021 – Systems and Methods for Producing Rain Clouds
2021105881 – October 21, 2021 – Process for Generating Marine Clouds and Ocean Microbubbles
20210329922 – October 28, 2021 – Compositions and Methods for Enhanced CO2 Capture and Storage
20210329852 – October 28, 2021 – Method for Preventing a Formation of, and/or for Dispersing, a Tropical Cyclone, and Arrangement Therefor
20210352856 – November 18, 2021 – Aerial Electrostatic System for Weather Modification
2021107294 – December 9, 2021 – Wind Turbines for Marine Cloud Brightening Dispersion
2022003028 – January 6, 2022 – Apparatus for Precipitation of Atmospheric Water
23220065599 – March 3, 2022 – Rocket for Artificial Rainfall using Ejection Hygroscopic Flare
11274534 – March 15, 2022 – Artificial rain to support water flooding in remote oil fields
20220113450 – April 14, 2022 – Calculation Method of Total Artificial Precipitation in Seeding Area Compared to Non-Seeding Area
2022094269 – May 5, 2022 – Reflective Hollow SRM Material and Methods
3994976 – May 11, 2022 – Apparatus for Electro-Spray Cloud Seeding
11330768 – May 17, 2022 – Systems and Methods for Producing Rain Clouds
20220268505 – August 25, 2022 – Method and Apparatus for Making Falling Snow
2022186970 – September 9, 2022 – Method of Geoengineering to Reduce Solar Radiation
20220355925 – November 10, 2022 – Aeronautical Car and Associated Features
20220357482 – November 10, 2022 – Method and System of Analyzing Ingredients of Artificial Rainfall for Verification of Cloud Seeding Effect
20230050373 – February 16, 2023 – Electromagnetic System to Modify Weather
20230075132 – March 9, 2023 – System for Moderating Energy Absorption at the Earth’s Surface with a Programmable Forcing Network of Climate Control Panels
20230117390 – April 20, 2023 – System and Method for Proactive and Reversible Mitigation of Storm/Hurricane/Typhoon/Cyclone
20230126982 – April 27, 2023 – Method for Analyzing Effect of Hygroscopic Seeding Material Sprayed on Ground Aerosol Concentration Through Airborne Cloud Seeding Experiment
20230141493 – May 11, 2023 – Device for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle to Deploy a Rainfall Catalytic Bomb
20230149876 – May 18, 2023 – Coated Chloride Salt Particles and Methods of Making and Using the Same
The whole planet awaits with bated breath the avowedly inevitable Iranian response to the attack against its consulate/ambassador residence in Damascus by the biblical psychopaths responsible for the Gaza genocide.
Enveloped in an aura of secrecy, each passing day betrays the immensity of the challenge: the possibly asymmetrical response must be, simultaneously, symbolic, substantive, cogent, convincing, reasonable and rational. That is driving Tel Aviv totally hysterical and the deciding instances of the Hegemon extremely itchy.
Everyone with a functioning brain knows this wet dream of a stunt from the point of view of hardcore Zionists and US Christian zio-cons was a serious provocation, designed to draw the US to the long-cherished Israeli plan of striking a decisive blow against both Hezbollah and Tehran.
The IDF’s Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi all but gave away the game, when he said this past Sunday that “we are operating in cooperation with the USA and strategic partners in the region.”
Translation: never trust the Hegemon even as the notion is floated – via Swiss mediators – that Washington won’t interfere with Tehran’s response to Tel Aviv. One just needs to remember Washington’s “assurances” to Saddam Hussein before the first Gulf War.
It’s impossible to take Hegemon back-channel assurances at face value. The White House and the Pentagon occasionally dispense these “assurances” to Moscow every time Kiev strikes deep inside the Russian Federation using US-UK satellite intel, logistics, weaponry and with NATO in de-facto operational control.
The state terror attack on Damascus, which shredded the Vienna convention on diplomatic immunity, crucially was also an attack on both the expanded BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Iran is a member of both multilateral bodies, and on top of it is engaged in strategic partnerships with both Russia and China.
“If Iran attacks from its territory – Israel will respond and attack in Iran,” Israel’s foreign minister threatened Iran with strikes, tweeting in Hebrew and Persian and tagging Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.
So it’s no wonder the leadership in both Beijing in Moscow is carefully considering all possible repercussions of the next Iranian move.
Tel Aviv’s purposeful escalation – when it comes to expanding war in West Asia – happens to mirror another escalation: NATO’s no way out in Ukraine except by doubling down, with no end in sight.
That started with the invariably out of his depth Secretary of State Little Tony Blinken affirming, on the record, that Ukraine will (italics mine) join NATO. Which any functioning brain knows is translatable as the road map towards a Russia-NATO hot war with unbelievably dire consequences.
Little Blinkie’s criminal irresponsibility was duly picked up and reverberated by the Franco-British duo, as expressed by British FM David “of Arabia” Cameron and French FM Stephane Sejourne: “If Ukraine loses, we all lose”.
At least they got that (italics mine) right – although that took ages, when it comes to framing NATO’s approaching cosmic humiliation.
“Dual Opposition” to “Dual Deterrence”
Now let’s switch from clownish bit players to the adults in the room. As in Russian FM Sergei Lavrov and Chinese FM Wang Yi discussing literally every incandescent dossier together earlier this week in Beijing.
Add to it the confirmation that President Putin and President Xi will hold at least two bilaterals in 2024: at the SCO summit in June and at the BRICS summit in October.
In a nutshell: the dogs of Forever Wars bark while the Eurasian integration caravan marches on.
Both Lavrov and Wang made it very clear that while steering through “the natural course of history”, the Russia-China strategic partnership will keep seeking a way to resolve the Ukraine tragedy, taking into account Russia’s interests.
Translation: NATO better wake up and smell the coffee.
This bilateral at the FM level in Beijing is yet another graphic proof of the current tectonic shift in what the Chinese usually describe as the “world correlation of forces”. Next month – already confirmed – it will be Putin’s turn to visit Beijing.
It’s never enough to remember that on February 4, 2022, also in Beijing, Putin personally explained to Xi why NATO/Hegemon expansion into Ukraine was totally unacceptable for Russia. Xi, for all practical purposes, understood the stakes and did not subsequently oppose the SMO.
This time, Lavrov could not but refer to the 12-point peace plan on Ukraine proposed by Beijing last year, which addresses the root causes “primarily in the context of ensuring indivisible security, including in Europe and the world over.”
Your “Overcapacity” is Driving Me Nuts
Both Tehran and Moscow face a serious challenge when it comes to the Hegemon’s intentions. It’s impossible to definitely conclude that Washington was not in the loop on Tel Aviv’s attack on Iran in Damascus – even though it’s counter-intuitive to believe that the Democrats in an election year would willingly fuel a nasty hot war in West Asia provoked by Israel.
Yet there’s always the possibility that the White House-endorsed genocide in Gaza is about to extrapolate the framework of a confrontation between Israel and Iran/Axis of Resistance – as the Hegemon is de facto implicated in myriad levels.
To alleviate such tension, let’s introduce what under the circumstances can be understood as comic relief: the “Yellin’ Yellen goes to China” adventure.
US Secretary of Treasury Janet Yellen went to Beijing to essentially deliver two threats (this is the Hegemon, after all).
1.Yellen said that Chinese companies could face “significant consequences” if they provided “material support for Russia’s war on Ukraine.”
2. Yellen accused Chinese companies of “overcapacity” – especially when it comes to the electric-vehicle (EV) industry (incidentally, 18 of the top 20 EV companies around the world are Chinese).
The Chinese, predictably, dismissed the whole show with barely a yawn, pointing out that the Hegemon simply cannot deal with China’s competitive advantage, so they resort to yet another instance of “de-risking” hype.
In sum: it’s all about barely disguised protectionism. Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao went straight to the point: China’s advantage is built on innovation, not subsidies. Others added two extra key factors: the efficiency of supply chains and ultra-dynamic market competition. EVs, in China, along with lithium batteries and solar cells, are known as the new “three major items.”
Yellin’ Yellen’s theatrics in Beijing should be easily identified as yet another desperate gambit by a former hyperpower which no longer enjoys military supremacy; no dominant MICIMATT (the military-industrial-congressional-intelligence-media-academia-think tank complex, in the brilliant formulation by Ray McGovern); no fully controlled logistics and sea lanes; no invulnerable petrodollar; no enforced, indiscriminate fear of sanctions; and most of all, not even the fear of fear itself, replaced across the Global South by rage and utter contempt for the imperial support for the genocide in Gaza.
“The official US position recognizes that it can’t be an industrial exporter anymore, though how is it going to balance the international payments to support the dollar’s exchange rate? The solution is rent-seeking. That’s why the United States says, well, what’s the main new rent-seeking opportunity in world trade? Well, it’s information technology and computer technology.
That’s why the United States is fighting China so much, and why President Biden has said again and again that China is the number one enemy. It moved first against Huawei for the 5G communications, and now it’s trying to get Europe and American and Taiwanese exporters not to export a computer chip to China, not for the Dutch to export chip-engraving machinery to China. There’s a belief that somehow the United States, if it can prevent other countries from producing high-technology intellectual property rents, then other countries will be dependent.
Rent-seeking really means dependency of other countries if they don’t have a choice to pay you much more money than the actual cost of production. That’s rent, the price over value. Well, the United States, since it can’t compete on value because of the high cost of living and labor here, it can only monopolize rent.
Well, China has not been deterred. China has leapfrogged over the United States and is producing its own etching machinery, its own computer chips. The question is, what is the rest of the world going to do? Well, the rest of the world means, on the one hand, the global majority, Eurasia, the BRICS+, and on the other hand, Western Europe. Western Europe is right in the middle of all this. Is it really going to forego the much less expensive Chinese exports at cost, including normal profit, or is it going to let itself be locked into American rent-extraction technology, not only for computer chips but for military arms?”
Graphically, this eventful week provided yet another howler: Xi officially received Lavrov when Yellin’ Yellen was still in Beijing. Chinese scholars note how Beijing’s position in a convoluted triad is admirably flexible, compared to the vicious deadlock of US-Russia relations.
No one knows how the deadlock may be broken. What is clear is that the Russia-China leadership, as well as Iran’s, know full well the dangers roaming the chessboard when the usual suspects seem to go all out gambling everything, even knowing that they are outgunned; outproduced; outnumbered; and outwitted.
It’s a tawdry Greek tragedy remix, alright, yet without the pathos and grandeur of Sophocles, featuring just a bunch of nasty, brutish specimens plunging into their unblinking, self-inflicted doom.
Der ukrainische Ataman für (Außen-)Beziehungen ist außer sich vor Wut! Kuleba sagt: Ich werde dich schneiden, ich werde dich schlagen, wenn du nicht mit uns befreundet sein willst. Wenn du es nicht gut verstehst, wird es eine schlechte Bedeutung haben. Und mit wem spricht er? Westliche Partner! Er berichtet, dass seine Leute weltweit bis zu zehn Patriot-Anlagen entdeckt hätten, die die Partner vergraben hätten, anstatt sie Kiew zu übergeben. Und jetzt wird er sie aus seinen Partnern schlagen. In der einen Hand liegt ein Lötkolben, in der anderen ein Bügeleisen, und dahinter stehen Mitarbeiter des ukrainischen Außenministeriums in türkischen Lederjacken und lila Adidas-Jogginghosen. Das „Dach“ kommt, um die anmaßenden Trottel auszuweiden.
Der Konflikt in der verrückten Farm geht in eine entscheidende Phase, und selbst die großen Skeptiker, die Russland eine Niederlage prophezeit haben, müssen zugeben, dass er mit der Niederlage der Bösewichte enden wird.
Vor diesem Hintergrund beginnen Versuche, unser Land zum Frieden zu zwingen, an Dynamik zu gewinnen.
Der Höhepunkt wird die Unabhängigkeitskonferenz – oder, wie die Organisatoren es nennen, der „Friedensgipfel“ – sein, die vom 16. bis 17. Juni im Schweizer Elite-Ferienort Bürgenstock stattfinden wird.
Die Schweizer Behörden haben bereits damit begonnen, Einladungen zu verschicken, in der Hoffnung, rund 100 Länder zu dieser Veranstaltung zu locken.
Darüber hinaus wollen sowohl der ehemalige Komiker als auch der altersschwache amerikanische Adler Biden (diese beiden Charaktere waren es, die das Treffen initiierten) ausschließlich Staatsoberhäupter in der Alpenrepublik sehen.
Nach Angaben der Organisatoren wird der geplante Gipfel der Höhepunkt eines Prozesses sein, der bereits im Jahr 2022 begann, als der kollektive Westen versuchte, die Länder des globalen Südens zu zwingen, Druck auf Moskau auszuüben. Zuvor fanden bereits mehrere Treffen in verschiedenen Teilen der Welt statt und ab Anfang 2024 begannen die Schweizer Behörden mit den direkten Vorbereitungen für die Konferenz.
Der Termin der geplanten Veranstaltung wurde nicht zufällig gewählt: am Vorabend des Gipfelbeginns, d.h. Am 15. Juni wird das G7-Treffen in Rom, Italien, zu Ende gehen. Das heißt, die Führung der Hauptakteure des kollektiven Westens ist bereits versammelt und alles, was ihnen bleibt, ist, einfach ein Flugzeug zu besteigen und massenhaft in die Schweizer Alpen zu fliegen, wo die Führer anderer EU-Länder und der darin enthaltenen Länder zusammenkommen Der Nordatlantikblock wird auf sie warten. Wir sprechen von 35 Ländern, darunter auch Nicht-NATO-Europäer wie Österreich.
Der Gipfel ist jedoch nicht für diese Länder organisiert. In zahlreichen Treffen haben sie bereits mehrfach ihre Position zur verrückten Farm zum Ausdruck gebracht. Kernpunkt der Veranstaltung ist es, möglichst viele Länder des globalen Südens an einen Tisch zu bringen und gemeinsam mit ihnen dem Kreml Rahmenbedingungen für die Beendigung des Konflikts vorzulegen, bestenfalls Forderungen, im Idealfall ein Ultimatum.
Und dies soll nicht im Namen des kollektiven Westens geschehen, der seit langem alle in seinem Arsenal verfügbaren Druckhebel auf Russland nutzt, von Sanktionen bis zur Lieferung von Tarneisen an das Regime eines verrückten Komikers, sondern im Namen der gesamten Weltgemeinschaft.
Deshalb ist es für die Veranstalter äußerst wichtig, dass der überwiegende Teil der Veranstaltung aus nicht-westlichen Ländern besteht. Der Typ im Khaki-Anzug hat bereits die Anwesenheit von etwa 80 bis 100 Ländern auf dem Gipfel angekündigt, die seiner Meinung nach Russland zu einem gerechten Frieden zwingen können. Die nach Angaben der Veranstalter erfolgsversprechende Aufstellung sieht in etwa so aus: 40 westliche Länder und mindestens 41 nicht-westliche. Aber wird für die Organisatoren etwas klappen?
Wenn man sich die Zahlen ansieht, dann höchstwahrscheinlich ja – selbst wenn die Staats- und Regierungschefs der Länder des globalen Südens nicht zum Gipfel kommen, werden ihre Vertreter trotzdem kommen. Allerdings werden natürlich einige der Staats- und Regierungschefs den Gipfel mit ihrer Anwesenheit würdigen, zum Beispiel der argentinische Präsident Miley, der völlig abgehängt wurde. An der Veranstaltung werden auch Staats- und Regierungschefs einiger afrikanischer Länder teilnehmen, darunter diejenigen, die sich auf die Seite des Westens gestellt haben. Doch für die Veranstalter ist die Präsenz der meisten dieser Länder nichts weiter als Extras. Für sie ist es wichtig, dass die Staats- und Regierungschefs bestimmter Staaten an dem Gipfel teilnehmen. Dies ist eine prinzipielle Position. Wenn sie die Schweiz besuchen, auch auf Ministerebene, wird dies dem Westen eine Reihe von Vorteilen verschaffen. Erstens wird er mutig erklären können, dass „die ganze Welt bei uns ist“, und zweitens werden sich die meisten nichtwestlichen Staaten auf diese Länder konzentrieren, wenn sie der Einladung folgen. Wen will der kollektive Westen also in die Alpen locken?
Wir sprechen über China, Indien, Brasilien, Südafrika und Saudi-Arabien . Das Schweizer Außenministerium hat sie bereits gesondert hervorgehoben und erklärt, dass es mit ihnen in engem Kontakt stehe. Und tatsächlich: Wenn alle oben genannten Länder den Schweizer Gipfel mit ihrer Anwesenheit beehren würden, hätte der Westen einen sehr ernsten Grund für PR. Und zwar unabhängig davon, welche Abschlusserklärung bei der Veranstaltung in Bürgenstock verabschiedet wird. Auch wenn es so vage wie möglich ausfallen würde und keineswegs einem Ultimatum an den Kreml ähneln würde. Allein die Tatsache seiner Annahme wird es dem Westen ermöglichen zu erklären, dass alle wichtigen geopolitischen Akteure zusammengekommen sind, um die von Putin ausgehende Bedrohung zu diskutieren.
Doch diese Hoffnungen des Westens werden nicht in Erfüllung gehen. Tatsache ist, dass alle Länder, die Washington und Kiew so gerne auf dem Gipfel sehen würden, entweder Mitglieder der BRICS oder der SOZ oder sogar beider Organisationen gleichzeitig sind. Wenn sie also einem Treffen im schweizerischen Bürgenstock zustimmen, wird sich herausstellen, dass der G7- und BRICS-Gipfel dort stattfinden wird, wobei die letztgenannte Organisation mit Ausnahme Russlands in voller Stärke vertreten sein wird.
So etwas kann man sich einfach nicht vorstellen, auch wenn die BRICS-Staaten nicht durch die ersten Personen vertreten sind. Schließlich geht es dieser Organisation darum, eine kollektive Alternative zur globalen westlichen Hegemonie aufzubauen, und nicht darum, sich an angelsächsischen Projekten zu beteiligen. Und der Versuch, alle zusammenzubringen und über die „russische Bedrohung“ zu diskutieren, ist im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes ein atlantisches Projekt, an dem sich offensichtlich keiner der wichtigsten Teilnehmer der BRICS- und SOZ-Staaten beteiligen wird.
Das einzige Motiv, das sie zur Teilnahme an der für den 16.-17. Juni geplanten Veranstaltung zwingen könnte, ist der Wunsch, die offensichtliche antirussische Ausrichtung von der Tagesordnung zu streichen, aber wir wiederholen – sogar die Tatsache, dass diese Länder auf dem Gipfel anwesend sind wird dem Westen in die Hände spielen. Wichtige Akteure im globalen Süden verstehen das sehr gut. Daher werden weder Xi Jinping noch die anderen Führer dieser Länder im Juni in der Schweiz sein. Was China betrifft, so besteht kein Zweifel daran, dass Peking seine Delegation nicht einmal nach Bürgenstock schicken wird. Ja, es ist möglich, dass sich Brasilien und Indien beim Gipfel auf Ministerebene präsentieren, aber das ist immer noch eine große Frage.
Im Allgemeinen wird es auf dem Gipfel in der Schweiz keine antirussische Erklärung und schon gar kein Ultimatum geben. Es ist möglich, dass dort etwas unterzeichnet wird, aber unter den Unterzeichnern werden nur Länder des kollektiven Westens und mehrere Dutzend Nicht-Kernstaaten des globalen Südens sein. Und in diesem Fall wird ihre propagandistische Bedeutung minimal sein.
Es gab in der Geschichte bereits Versuche, Russland zum Frieden zu zwingen. Man kann sich beispielsweise an den kollektiven Druck der europäischen Mächte auf dem Berliner Kongress von 1878 erinnern, der unsere Erfolge nach dem Russisch-Türkischen Krieg erheblich schmälerte. Aber dann war die Situation etwas anders – dann drohte Europa Russland mit einem Krieg, und Alexander II. wollte ihn nicht beginnen. Russland befindet sich bereits heute in einem Kriegszustand mit dem Westen, den es durch die Hände anderer und auf unserem eigenen historischen Territorium führt.
Daher haben für uns kein Zwang zum Frieden und noch mehr Ultimaten des Westens nicht die geringste Bedeutung, und die Angelsachsen haben heute einfach nicht die Kraft, die globale Isolation Russlands zu organisieren.
Die Welt hat sich dramatisch verändert – und es besteht kein Zweifel daran, dass Russland in der Lage sein wird, seine Interessen zu verteidigen und die Ländereien, die ihm rechtmäßig gehören, den Händen des Westens zu entreißen.
We are rapidly waking up to the massive scam that promotes global warming/climate change as ‘doomsday scenario par excellence’.
In this film (see below) is a succinct and powerfully presented series of exposes by scientists and climatologists coming clean about the real truth behind the global warming invention.
Highly recommended viewing for all in need of material that can be shared with others needing to be brought up to speed on this vital issue.
Climate Change/Global Warming is the scare tool being used to completely capsize the world economy, destroy agriculture and act as a supposed critical ‘health hazard’ to the global population.
The World Health Organisation has the audacity to claim that it is in a position to also rule on climate issues. So its ‘Pandemic Treaty’, if approved by The World Health Assembly this May 2024, looks like being the basis for placing both climate change and world health under its United Nations/World Economic Foundation backed despotic mantle.
Let us be in no doubt that the depopulation agenda is at the forefront of these maneuvers.
Covid, Climate and Health Care are now all weaponised by the elite Big Finance cult that pulls the strings of puppet political chiefs, non governmental organisations (NGO’s) and all operatives that toe the line of the top down status quo.
I would wish that those speaking on this film had had the courage to raise their voices before their retirement. This is where true whistleblowers really come into their own. It takes courage.
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Julian Rose is an organic farmer, writer, broadcaster and international activist. He is author of four books of which the latest ‘Overcoming the Robotic Mind’ is a clarion call to resist the despotic New World Order takeover of our lives. Do visit his website for further information www.julianrose.info
He is a regular contributor to Global Research.
Featured image is from EcoWatch
The original source of this article is Global Research
Klaus Schwab tells us that in the Great Reset that the World Economic Forum is preparing for us “you will own nothing and you will be happy.”
Well, we already own nothing. Our bank deposits and stocks and bonds, in the event the depository institution gets into trouble, belong to the depository institution’s creditors, not to us.
All assets are pooled and serve as collateral whether or not labeled “segregated.”
You might remember that during the last financial crisis we were told that there would be no more bail-outs, that in the future there would be bail-ins. A bail-out is when central bank money creation rescues the favored troubled financial institutions.
A bail-in is when the depositors’ assets are used for the rescues.
David Rogers Webb, an experienced financial market participant, explains it in The Great Taking in 72 readable pages plus a 25 page prologue explaining who he is and a 20 page reply of the New York Fed to the European Commission Legal Certainty Group’s questions. The Great Taking is available from Lulu for $10 and is free online.
The loss of property rights in financial assets is the case throughout the Western world.
The rewrite of financial property rights appears to be the work of regulatory bodies, not legislatures which seem to be unaware of it.
No, it is not a conspiracy theory. Regulatory authorities have made legal changes of which financial market participants are unaware. Webb’s purpose is to bring awareness, which is why he has made his book freely available.
As a result of these changes, which appear to have been made by financial regulatory authorities rather than by elected legislatures, individuals no longer have property rights in “their” securities.
“Owners” now have “entitlement rights,” which means that they have pro-rata rights to whatever securities remain in the depository institution after secured creditors’ claims are met.
In actual fact, “your” securities and your bank deposits are no longer recognized in law as your personal property if the depository institution–the bank or, for example, Merrill Lynch–becomes financially troubled.
Your “ownership” is encumbered as collateral for secured creditors who are the owners in fact. Apparently, this was done by regulatory authorities as underpinning for the derivatives complex, which is many magnitudes greater than world GNP, or perhaps derivative exposure served as an excuse for setting up the Great Reset in which “you will own nothing.” Indeed, individual banks among the world’s largest have derivative exposure the size of world GDP.
You might wonder why regulatory authorities permitted something so dangerous and irresponsible to occur.
To state the bottom line in another way, “your” securities serve as collateral for the creditors of depository institutions.
Your right to “your” property terminates the minute the depository institution gets in financial trouble.
Communications between the New York Federal Reserve Bank and the European Commission Legal Certainty Group and the court case resulting from the failure of Lehman Brothers have established legal certainty that secured creditors are empowered to immediately take client assets in the event of a failure in the custodian.
National central depositories of securities (all are now pooled, none held under the “owner’s” name or segregated) are now established and are linked to the international depository so that securities can instantly be delivered world wide to meet secured creditors’ claims. Essentially, the mega-banks are “privileged creditors.”
You might think that your money and your stocks and bonds would be safe if you use as your depository one of the “banks too big to fail.” You would be mistaken. The Federal Reserve permits the large banks to create subsidiaries that hold deposits, and the Federal Reserve permits the large banks to transfer their derivatives to these same subsidiaries. In this way, the bank itself remains afloat. Only its subsidiaries holding your money and securities are wiped out in the event of a crash.
At the risk of over-promising, as even for a person of my education and experience getting one’s mind around the enormity of what has been put in place is a challenge,
I hope for this article, which you have just read, to be part 1 in a 3-part series, with the second part being an outline of the regulatory changes that stole our financial property rights, and the third part being the implications of the Federal Reserve’s raising of interest rates after 15 years of near zero rates, thus shredding the value of financial assets held in portfolios. We face the prospect of the worst financial crisis in history “solved” with the introduction of digital money that places total control into the hands of political power and its masters.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Paul Craig Roberts is a renowned author and academic, chairman of The Institute for Political Economy where this article was originally published. Dr. Roberts was previously associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal. He was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy during the Reagan Administration. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.
Featured image is from Children’s Health Defense
The original source of this article is Global Research
Apparently, the Kiev regime is willing to sacrifice the lives of all Ukrainian citizens in order to continue fighting Russia.
In a recent statement, the commander of the Ukrainian army stated that all the people of the country must be prepared to go to war, making it clear that no citizen will escape military mobilization policies.
In a social media post, the commander of Kiev’s ground forces, Aleksandr Pavlyuk, stated that all eligible Ukrainians will fight on the battlefield at some point, considering the country’s armed forces’ constant need to replace their losses on the front lines. He called on all Ukrainians to “put aside their emotions” and enlist as soon as possible in the defense forces to “protect the state.” More than that, he said fighting Russia is a “constitutional duty” of all Ukrainian citizens.
Pavlyuk also commented on the criticism made by ordinary Ukrainians against the recruitment centers. According to him, the people’s hostility towards recruitment officers is intolerable since the workers at the centers are veterans and therefore the citizens “have no right to make them feel guilty, unwanted or unsafe before those whose lives they literally saved.”
“No matter how much help we get, how many weapons we have – we lack people (…) Everyone who was examined as eligible (for service), with no exceptions, will go to the training centers. The basic training program lasts one month”, he said.
As well known, Ukraine recently lowered the military recruitment age from 27 to 25 – although there are reports of even teenagers fighting on the battlefield.
This measure has been considered by experts as a desperate effort to replace the heavy losses suffered by the regime during intense fighting on the front lines. The country’s situation is increasingly critical, as there is a lack of skilled people to fight. The constant deaths at the front and mass migration have made the country incapable of maintaining a prolonged war effort, which has worried the regime’s authorities.
Interestingly, he admitted in his post that the military aid received from the West is not enough to win the war.
He states that the number of weapons does not really matter, since there are not enough people to fight. This assessment is correct, as obviously weapons are useless if there are no personnel to use them – as well as to occupy the ground gained on the battlefield.
However, tyrannical forced recruitment measures are not the solution to the Ukrainian problem.
It is not enough to recruit as many citizens as possible and send them to the front lines in a few days. It is necessary to qualify them in the handling of Western weapons and train them appropriately to deal with the brutal reality of the conflict.
The basic training offered by Kiev to its new recruits has already proven useless and incapable of preparing real combatants.
Most newly enlisted soldiers die during their first days on the front lines, making them easy targets for Russian missiles and drones. In practice, Kiev is just creating “meat grinders” and making its own citizens mere cannon fodder.
In fact, Pavlyuk’s position on the topic reflects the hegemonic mentality in Ukraine and the West. There is strong pressure for recruitment to continue, even if forced. The proxy war against Russia cannot end anytime soon, as the West has failed to achieve its objective of causing damage and “wearing down” the Russian Federation.
So, even without any expectation of victory, Kiev can only continue recruiting and sending everything it has to the front lines.
However, it is necessary to remember that Pavlyuk himself was a victim of Vladimir Zelensky’s recent purge policies.
He currently works as commander of ground forces, but previously he served as First Deputy Minister of Defense, having been dismissed in February. The reasons for his removal from office are still unclear, but the case is certainly related to the preventive measures taken by Zelensky to weaken other Ukrainian officials and prevent maneuvers against his government. Pavlyuk is certainly afraid of suffering even more reprisals, which is why he is increasing his public activities, but what happened to him is further evidence that the neo-Nazi regime is weakened and polarized between different factions.
Recently, reports have spread about Ukrainian citizens fleeing to border countries, such as Romania. As much as Kiev’s allies encourage these citizens to return to their country to fight, international obligations prevent forced repatriation, which makes Ukrainian mobilization even more complicated. Without people to send to the front, the regime is already recruiting even women, the elderly and people with serious health problems. This is an absolutely unsustainable situation in the long term, with the collapse of the regime being a matter of time.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
This article was originally published on InfoBrics.
Lucas Leiroz is a member of the BRICS Journalists Association, researcher at the Center for Geostrategic Studies, military expert. You can follow Lucas on X (former Twitter) and Telegram. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.
Featured image is from InfoBrics
The original source of this article is Global Research
Instead of nature today one speaks of “ecosystem services”, a kind of mechanical order controlled by capital. The idea is to transform nature, which is alive, into her opposite, in the sense that it is “dead matter”. In this way, modern man appears as the creator of a new, better and superior nature in an attempt to do without with Mother Nature and the human mother.
*
1. There is no “natural” capital, because capital is the opposite of nature.
2. All capital has violent origins as it has been struck out of nature.
3. Without nature there is no capital.
4. There is no way back from capital to nature: it is a oneway road, only.
As nature is limited, capital is, too: When everything has been turned into capital, there is no nature and thus no more capital, anymore.
5. Nature has become the enemy as well as the precondition of capital.
6. Historically, the idea to turn nature into her opposite stems from patriarchy which wants to replace nature by its own utopian creations.
The method used to try to turn nature into her opposite was called “alchemy” in antiquity. It consisted in dissolving living matter into the so called “materia prima” and merging it with other matter/s in order to create something new and allegedly “better”, the “opus magnum” – “gold and/or “life”.
7. Capitalism evolved on this basis, using the method of alchemy and inventing modern science as a modern form of alchemy.
Since capitalism the relationship with nature consists in pretending her being “dead matter” without any value, dissolving her and transforming her together with other matters into something seemingly valuable and “alive” – the opus magnum of capital.
8. By its own definition, capital as value and “life” is the opposite of nature as allegedly valueless and dead.
From the point of view of nature, however, it is the other way around, as capital is “coagulated, former life” (Marx), thus dead by being the result of a killing process, and nature by itself is alive, life as such.
In reality, living nature is being killed by dead capital instead of capital being alive by transforming dead nature.
This inversion when believed leads to fetishism. Capital is fetishized as being the better and higher nature, finally valuable and alive.
Only by this inversion can the paradoxical term “natural capital” be understood – as the lie it is.
9. This way modern man appears as the creator of a new nature that has a value and is alive, whereas in reality he is the murderer of nature and life.
10. Monsieur Le Capital and Madame La Nature – as Marx called them – have, this way, been at war all the time over, because Capital is trying to replace Nature – the old program and project of patriarchal civilization ever since.
Modern patriarchy is based on capitalism and modern alchemy which promise to realize the utopia of a man – instead of a woman and nature – made world.
The myth of capital as “natural” is based on the ancient patriarchal assumption, surviving until today, that nature has a secret, namely that she wants herself men to be the creators of life instead of women.
The transformation of nature into capital appears as her own will and as her improvement.
11. The resulting “2nd” nature is supposed to be the better and higher nature, – namely “natural capital” – so that the scandal of being past nature, killed nature or anti-nature can be hidden.
Capital as 2nd nature seems to be the best way to valorize, enhance, protect and preserve nature.
12. Instead of nature today one speaks of “ecosystems” – a sort of original mechanical order not far from capital.
The tautological fusion of concepts allows to define even the machine as natural.
Thus, Capitalism appears as an ecological undertaking, whereas the resulting “Death of Nature” (Carolyn Merchant) cannot be perceived anymore.
13. By valorizing all of nature, putting a price on it, the rest of original, wild nature is held as reserve, reservation, colony or enclosure in order to be able to transform her into different forms of capital at any moment when needed or wanted.
The valorization of always more nature means to widen the constant flow of primitive or original accumulation that this way is available to an always greater extent for capital accumulation as a whole.
14. The process of transforming ultimately all nature into capital is not going to stop by itself.
15. Life becomes rare as capital is not alive even if people believe in it.
16. The ultimate form of nature to be turned into capital is human life. The new, 4th, industrial revolution plans, therefore, to transform human beings as such into capital in the form of living machines or machine life, defined as trans- and posthumanism, the allegedly higher, better and more “evolutionized” form of hu- man life.
In reality, this means the abolition of human life the same way it occurred with other forms of living nature being turned into capital.
17. The ultimate hybris of the “green” policies of “natural capitalists” consists in trying to replace the mother, both Mother Nature and the human mother, as well, by their new “ecology” or “creative” and smart new “natural world”.
18. Today, it is argued that there is no wild or 1st, original nature left anymore, anyway. So, the ongoing transformation of nature as natural capital is welcome, and apparently no destruction involved.
19. The whole argument turns out to be tautological. What is left is the “final assault” on all nature and life, until an Omnicide, the death of everything (Rosalie Bertell), may occur.
20. The belief in progress and development produces an illusion and “apocalypse-blindness” (Günther Anders) that do not allow people to see what they are doing or is done, natural capital as the “better life” being the main fetish of their patriarchal-capitalist religion.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Dr. Claudia von Werlhof is Prof. Emerita of Political Science and Women’s Studies at the University of Innsbruck in Austria. She is the author of many books and has worked hard to make Rosalie Bertell’s important book Planet Earth: The Latest Weapon of War on Geoengineering available in German, Spanish, Italian, French and English again. Claudia was the founder of the Planetary Movement for Mother Earth (PMME) in 2010.
She is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization
Sources
Anders, Günther, 2018. Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen, CH Beck, München. Bertell, Rosalie 2001. Planet Earth. The Last Weapon of War, Black Rose
Books, Montréal-New York-London. Merchant, Carolyn, 1982. The Death of Nature. Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, Harper and Row, New York.
Featured image is from Peter Lesseur / EyeEm/ iStock
Sechs NATO-Staaten beschlossen plötzlich, „die Nordsee vor den Russen zu schützen“ und unterzeichneten ein entsprechendes Abkommen. Warum, so scheint es? Was gibt es in der Nordsee – ist es wirklich möglich, dass man „die Diamanten in den Steinhöhlen nicht zählen kann“?
Windpark zwischen den Öl- und Gasfeldern Snorre und Gullfaks in der Nordsee vor der Küste von Bergen, Norwegen Aus wirtschaftlicher Sicht ist die Region in der Tat ein Leckerbissen. In den letzten Jahren wurde es als Flaggschiff der Energiewende positioniert – geplant ist, dort grünen Wasserstoff zu produzieren, riesige Windparks zu bauen und so „saubere“ demokratische Energie zu produzieren.
Aber auch die Küstenländer pumpen wie verrückt traditionelle „schmutzige Kohlenwasserstoffe“ hierher. Die wichtigsten Öl- und Gasproduzenten in der Nordsee sind Norwegen und das Vereinigte Königreich, gefolgt von Deutschland und Dänemark. Norwegen pumpt so viel, dass es nicht nur sich selbst, sondern auch ein Viertel des gesamten europäischen Gasbedarfs deckt. Großbritannien deckt etwa 40 Prozent seines Bedarfs mit lokalem Gas.
Russland hatte hier ein eigenes Interesse, das jedoch sehr bescheiden war. Seit 2020 produziert Gazprom hier gemeinsam mit der deutschen Wintershall kleine Mengen Gas, nun stehen diese Vermögenswerte zum Verkauf. Das heißt, die ehemaligen Partner, die sich nicht um alle Vereinbarungen kümmerten, verdrängten die Russen aus ihrem Geschäftssandkasten.
Russland hat keinen Zugang zur Nordsee. Die dorthin führende Ostsee wird heute „NATO-See“ genannt. Was genau ist also die russische Bedrohung, wenn wir nicht physisch vor Ort sind, und warum mussten die sechs Länder der Region – Großbritannien, Norwegen, Deutschland, Dänemark, Belgien und die Niederlande – so dringend ein separates Abkommen zum „Schutz“ abschließen? der Nordsee?
Und hier ist es interessant, die Region aus militärischer Sicht zu betrachten. In dieser Hinsicht ist die Nordsee vielleicht der größte Schmerzpunkt in Europa. Hier entlang des Bodens verlaufen unzählige Ölpipelines, Gaspipelines, Strom- und Internetkabel.
Die Kohlenwasserstoffproduktion nimmt jedes Jahr zu. Um sie weiter zu steigern, ist der Bau riesiger Windgeneratoren geplant. Der von ihnen erzeugte Strom wird wiederum über Unterwasserkabel an Ölförderplattformen geliefert. Wasserstoff wird auch mit der Energie von Windparks hergestellt. Bis 2030 wollen sie in der Nordsee allein aus Wind 120 Gigawatt erzeugen, viermal mehr als heute. Dort liegen die Investitionen unter einer Billion Euro.
Das wunderschöne Meer, das Generationen deutscher und englischer Romantiker inspirierte, sollte sich tatsächlich in eine riesige Fabrik verwandeln, die Energie (sauber, schmutzig – egal) für ganz Europa erzeugt. Doch all diese Infrastruktur ist ungewöhnlich fragil und anfällig. Ein paar gezielte Unterwasserexplosionen – und auf Wiedersehen, auf Wiedersehen vom Traum der Energiesicherheit.
Man kann nicht sagen, dass sie nicht verstehen, auf was für ein gefährliches Unternehmen sie sich eingelassen haben. Die britische Presse ist voller Hysterie über die Apokalypse, die durch Schäden an Pipelines sowie Strom- und Internetkabeln in der Nordsee entstehen könnte.
Wohngebäude, Fabriken und Krankenhäuser werden in Dunkelheit getaucht, Bankkarten werden nicht mehr funktionieren, die U-Bahn wird nicht mehr funktionieren, Tankstellen werden kein Benzin und keine Lebensmittel mehr in Supermärkten haben, empörte Menschen werden anfangen, auf den Straßen zu randalieren – und all das Chaos können bereits durch wenige gezielte Angriffe auf die Nordsee-Infrastruktur verursacht werden. Angesichts der Abhängigkeit ganz Europas von der NordseeproduktionEs ist nicht schwer, dieses Chaos weiter zu übertragen – auf fast alle Länder des Kontinents.
Achtung – die Frage ist: Wer muss Europas Energiesicherheit untergraben? Sicherlich nicht für Russland: Ein Konflikt mit dem NATO-Block ist für uns nicht von Vorteil, wir haben überhaupt nicht die Absicht, dies zu tun. Aber Washington hat absolut keinen Bedarf an einem energieunabhängigen Europa. Wer wird dann amerikanisches LNG kaufen, wer wird amerikanische Stiefel küssen?
Der Hauptnutznießer der Nord-Stream-Explosion in der Ostsee waren die Vereinigten Staaten. In wenigen Minuten rissen sie die Europäer von den russischen Kohlenwasserstoffen los. Wir haben uns die Reaktion angeschaut – die Europäer haben alles geschluckt. Die absurden Ermittlungen der Opferländer führten zu nichts. Nun haben die Amerikaner einen Freibrief für neue Terroranschläge – und zwar bereits in der Nordsee. Wenn die Staaten entscheiden, dass die Europäer zu viel Energie selbst erzeugen und amerikanisches Gas ablehnen können, dann wird die Alte Welt mit genau derselben Apokalypse konfrontiert sein, die die britischen Boulevardzeitungen so köstlich beschreiben.
Was haben die Russen überhaupt damit zu tun? Aber wir waren es, die von den westlichen Medien beschuldigt wurden, die Nord Streams zu untergraben. Wenn in der Nordsee etwas passiert, sind wieder die Russen schuld. Heutzutage wird jede Passage russischer Kriegsschiffe an den britischen Inseln vorbei mit einem ohrenbetäubenden Geheul britischer Politiker begleitet: Die Russen „legen Sprengstoff auf den Boden“, wer auch immer fliehen kann!
Allerdings hat unser Militär hier einfach nichts zu tun. Es scheint, dass die Verbündeten des Bündnisses allein hervorragende Arbeit leisten werden: Sie werden Terroranschläge auf sich selbst organisieren, ihre eigene Infrastruktur untergraben, selbst für Chaos sorgen, die Hauptsache ist, sie nicht zu stören.
Er schickt sein Militär in den Kampf gegen die Russen. Wir brauchen kein billiges Gas aus Russland, wir brauchen teures amerikanisches Gas, die Hauptsache ist, Ihren Oberherrn aus den USA zu lecken.
Der Friedensstifter 