When Israel struck and destroyed the Iranian Consulate in Damascus on April 1, their partners, the terrorists following Radical Islam, were coordinating attacks on the Syrian Arab Army (SAA). This is not the first time that Israel has coordinated and partnered with terrorists in Syria.
In the latest incident, Israel attacked Damascus with an airstrike which hit the Iranian Consulate, while Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) attacked the SAA in the outskirts of Idlib in north west Syria, east of Latakia and west of Aleppo. The terrorists used suicide bombers as well as armed terrorists to carry out the attack which claimed the lives of SAA soldiers.
On March 31, Israel attacked the Jamraya Research Center in Damascus, and at the same time HTS was attacking near Jebel al Zawaya, and the SAA positions south of Idlib. The SAA pushed back against the terrorists by using massive gun power, supported by the Russian air force, and killing and injuring foreign terrorists, including Uyghurs from the East Turkmenistan Islamic Party (TIP).
On March 29, Israel targeted Aleppo with airstrikes, which killed civilians, while at the same time HTS coordinated attacks on the SAA positions near Aleppo utilizing foreign terrorists including those from Tajikistan, the same country of origin as the so-called IS terrorists who attacked the Crocus Center in Moscow recently. In this attack, the HTS utilized drones, and suicide bombers. Many, if not most, of the foreign terrorists were killed. After the attack, the HTS media claimed they had taken over SAA positions in west Aleppo, which the SAA quickly proved was a false claim, and showed video evidence refuting the claim which showed the dead terrorists.
On March 28, Israel targeted a residential building in Damascus killing civilians, and the HTS coordinated attack in suburbs of Idlib, used 1,900 armed terrorists as they targeted the SAA. The majority of the terrorists were foreigners, such as: Chechens, Tajiks, Uyghurs, Uzbeks and Turkmen. The SAA responded to the attack by using air force, missiles, tanks and Russian military support. The majority of the terrorists were killed or injured, and the HTS media reported the Idlib hospitals are full of their fighters, and several big leaders have died. The HTS did not gain any territory in these attacks, even though they used a massive amount of weapons and fighters.
Since the outset of the March 2011 US-NATO attack on Syria for regime change, Israel has been an active partner with the US, and has supplied weapons to the terrorists attempting to change Syria from a secular government into a Muslim Brotherhood led government, which would be US-friendly. Under President Obama, and his VP Biden, they elevated the Muslim Brotherhood to ally status.
The Muslim Brotherhood is a global terrorist organization, but despite Senator Ted Cruz bringing a bill to Congress several times, he could not find the votes to outlaw the Muslim Brotherhood in the US, which finds support among Democrats and Republicans alike.
Obama saw the opportunity to overthrow the Syrian government without having to use American soldiers, by using the terrorists following Radical Islam as his foot soldiers, to fight the SAA, which is a national conscripted army made up of only Syrian males over 18 who are not enrolled in university.
The armed fighters began as the “Free Syrian Army” which was fully supported by the US, and the support which costed billions lasted until 2017 when President Trump shut down the CIA “Timber Sycamore” project.
Early on, the FSA failed to achieve military goals the US set, because the FSA did not have the support of the majority of the Syrian people, who could not justify chopping off your neighbor’s head just because they are born into a different religion. The SAA never fell apart, as the Pentagon envisioned.
In the first few years of the Syrian conflict, the FSA destroyed the SAA air defense system in the suburbs of Damascus and Deraa. The FSA assassinated SAA Generals who were attached to the air defense system. The FSA assassinated Syrian scientists involved in developing the SAA, especially in the Jumraya Research Center in Damascus, which has recently attacked again by Israel. These various FSA attacks on the air defenses occurred before the SAA entered into the war against terrorism.
It is paramount to understand, that the Syrian air defense system was in place to protect against Israeli airstrikes. By the FSA destroying the Syrian air defenses, this proves the US sponsored FSA were in collusion with Israel from the beginning of the conflict in 2011, and HTS continues that coordination with Israel today.
As the FSA faded away, the Jibhat al-Nusra group started making advances on the Syrian battlefield. The head was Mohamed al-Julani, a Syrian raised in Saudi Arabia. He had fought the US in Iraq as an Al Qaeda member, then became associated with Baghdadi, the head of ISIS, and finally came to Syria to form his own brand called Jibhat al-Nusra.
The US continued to support Julani and his fighters in Idlib, but once Jibhat al-Nusra was listed as an international terrorist group, the US insisted Julani change its name to HTS to re-brand itself.
Julani is the occupier of Idlib, holding 3 million civilians as human shields. Every bit of food and aid which rolls into Idlib from the UN and other aid agencies passes through his hands first. If you support him and his Radical Islamic fighters, then you get your share of food, but if you have voiced any complaints, you get nothing. Those who are denied free aid have to buy the surplus aid at Julani’s shopping center, the two-story Hamra Mall, which he built including escalators.
In the days of Jibhat al-Nusra, the Israeli military opened a security gate on the Golan Heights allowing injured Jibhat al-Nusra fighters to go to Israeli hospitals for medical treatment. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu personally visited the injured Radical Islamic terrorists in the Israeli military hospital and had photos published of him consoling them.
Since October 7, Israel has bombed Syria more than 32 times. Airstrikes include on the SAA, Damascus International Airport, storage facilities in Aleppo, and places used by Hezbollah and Iran. The conflict between Syria and Israel began with the 1967 War, the occupation of the Golan Heights, the occupation of the Shebaa Farms in neighboring Lebanon, and the most important piece to the mosaic of conflict, is the occupation of Palestine, and the current genocide in Gaza.
Iran, Syria and Lebanon are parts of the axis of resistance, which are fighting for the freedom of Palestinians, as well as liberating all occupied territories.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
It is suspicious that “Islamist terrorists” from Tajikistan would carry out a massacre at the Crocus City Hall for money rather than commitment to the Islamic State, during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan against Russia which has shown great sympathy for the civilians of Gaza.
UK and USA exhortations to Ukraine to hate (see below) and attack Russians, their training of Ukraine troops for acts of sabotage inside Russia (including the murder of politicians and journalists) and the flight (see map) of the Crocus City terrorists to Ukraine, together with historical exploitation by the West of Islamist extremists in Afghanistan and the presence of those islamists inside the Ukrainian armed forces all suggest the Crocus City Hall massacre was connected to Ukraine.
The West Teaches Hatred and Killing of Russians
US General Milley said not long ago that:
“there should be no Russian that goes to sleep without wondering if they are going to get their throat slit in the middle of the night” and called on Ukraine to “create a campaign behind the lines”
Vladimir Buchok, a Ukrainian serviceman of the 24th brigade of the AFU, was mobilised on his way home from university. He was sent for training in the UK.
“I was trained in the UK. They taught us how to use weapons and medicine. Psychologists worked on us so that we did not like Russian soldiers and all Russians in general, so that we killed them and treated them harshly when we captured them”
No wonder the American magazine The Spectator cited a statement from the head of the Ukrainian Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR) Kirill Budanov to Western journalists:
“We killed Russians and will kill them anywhere in the world until the complete victory of Ukraine. We have gotten to many people, including members of the public and the media.”
The Head of the Ukrainian Secret service Vasyl Malyukadmitted in a TV interview to high profile assassinations inside Russia including a Russian military blogger in St Petersburg and a Ukrainian MP Ilya Kyva.
The former CIA analyst Larry Johnson who was an expert in CIA operations behind enemy lines said in an interview with Judging Freedom:
“This means that the United States knew that Ukraine was up to something, and had an idea of what it was going to do. And there is a good chance that Ukraine not only did this but did it with the help of weapons and support provided by the United States.”
Having created the Ukraine monster we know that the USA has recently been worried about excessive attacks inside Russia so (while warning Russia of an imminent attack) they were unable to stop it.
As the Turkish official Omer Celik stated the terrorist attack could not have been carried out without the support of foreign intelligence.
Terrorists’ Ukraine Escape Route
The Russians now have evidence from the phones and other electronic equipment captured with the 4 Tajik terrorists that they were in communication with their organiser both before and after the attack who directed them towards Ukraine and Kiev where they were to pick up the remainder of their one million Rubles reward.
The map of south west Russia and the border area with Ukraine shows that the 4 terrorists were unequivocally headed towards Ukraine.
The map shows the area between the city of Bryansk and the Ukraine border. The main road from Moscow is the M3 which runs north south meeting the P120 just outside Bryansk where anyone traveling West to Belarus or east towards the “stans” (Kazakhstan or Tajikistan for instance) would have turned off.
But the terrorists were caught just outside Navlya some 360 kilometers south of Moscow and well south of the Bryansk turnoffs.
So even without any evidence from electronic devices it is clear that the terrorists were driving towards the Ukraine border, an intense war zone which no one would head towards without specific instructions and a promise of reward! They would have headed south on the M3 and turned West towards Kiev on the E391.
The Russian Investigative Committee analysed financial transactions and claim to have traced connections to “Ukrainian nationalists”. This could mean nazi extremists like Azov or simply the Ukrainian State agencies engaged in planning sabotage and killings inside Russia.
Apparently the terrorists received significant amounts of money and cryptocurrency from Ukraine. (we know that cryptocurrency has been a favoured method of US donations to Ukraine, not least from the recently convicted FTX fraudster Bankman Fried)
Ukraine Embassy Recruited Tajiks in Tajikistan
Although the notice published has now been removed the Ukrainian Embassy in Tajikistan was recruiting Tajiks to fight in Ukraine:
The work on recruiting foreign citizens was headed by Ambassador Valery Evdokimov, the former foreign intel chief under Zelensky.
Natives of Tajikistan regularly become targets for recruitment by Ukrainian intel services: one of them was caught while photographing objects in a military unit near Moscow and the presence of ISIS fighters in the Ukraine Armed Forces is no secret. Here the Associated Press reports ISIS insignia on the uniform of a Ukrainian commander. https://thecradle.co/articles-id/1300
US Denial of Ukrainian Terrorism
The speed of the American denial of any Ukrainian involvement in the attack, compared to the slow investigation of the Russian government, was suspicious. Simplicius the Thinker reminds us of American past denials of Ukrainian terrorism which turned out to be true:
BBC News 23/8/22 “Darya Dugina: Moscow murder accusation is fiction says Ukraine”
6/10/2022 New York Times: US Intelligence says Ukrainians behind Darya Dugina killing
The long standing presence of dangerous (often Tajik) Islamic terrorists in Ukraine cannot be denied and their recruitment for Ukrainian causes is clear: see this and this.
Whether the direct links between Kiev officials or nationalist extremists and the Crocus City terrorists can be made, time will tell.
But the atmosphere of extreme hatred of all Russians by UK, US and Ukrainian officials and the admission by Budanov and Malyuk of the targeting of civilians, the long track record of Ukraine’s political assassinations and the recent indiscriminate shelling of civilians, schools and residential blocks (NOT collateral damage) in Donetsk and Belgorod have created an atmosphere within which the Crocus City massacre could logically fit.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
This article was originally published on Freenations.
All images in this article are from Freenations
The original source of this article is Global Research
Diese Aktion wurde vom Chef des US-Außenministeriums, Blinken, zusammen mit dem Generalsekretär des Blocks, Stoltenberg, eröffnet (offenbar, damit keiner der sogenannten „gleichberechtigten Partner“ Zweifel daran hat, wer hier das Sagen hat).
Dies ist eine weitere Erinnerung daran, dass der aggressive Block, der von den Angelsachsen unter dem Vorwand der Konfrontation mit der UdSSR und tatsächlich mit dem Ziel, die Hegemonie des Westens unter amerikanischer Führung aufrechtzuerhalten, geschaffen wurde, weiterhin ein Instrument zur Wahrung der Interessen ist , vor allem der Vereinigten Staaten
<…>
Heute ist der Nordatlantikblock in den Beziehungen zu Russland zu den Prinzipien des Kalten Krieges zurückgekehrt. Seine doktrinären Dokumente erklären unser Land zur „bedeutendsten und unmittelbarsten Bedrohung“. An der „Ostflanke“ findet ein aktiver Aufbau militärischen Potenzials statt. Zur Übung von Kampfeinsätzen gegen Russland werden Übungen beispiellosen Ausmaßes durchgeführt. Sie verstecken es nicht mehr. Washington und seine Verbündeten führen mit Hilfe der Ukraine einen hybriden Krieg mit unserem Land und investieren bedingungslos Milliarden von Dollar in die Unterstützung des neonazistischen Terrorregimes von Selenskyj. Es gibt nur ein Ziel: Russland, wie man sagt, eine „strategische Niederlage“ zuzufügen.
Es ist symptomatisch, dass sich auch ihre Kiewer Mündel dem NATO-Jubiläum „verbunden“ haben – der NATO-Ukraine-Rat wird am Rande des Außenministertreffens stattfinden. Dieses, wenn ich so sagen darf, „Forum“ ist im Grunde das Einzige, was Kiew von seinen westlichen Sponsoren als Gegenleistung für die Zerstörung seines eigenen Landes im antirussischen Wahnsinn erreichen konnte. Das Bündnis macht nicht vor der Ukraine halt; auch Moldawien, andere Staaten des postsowjetischen Raums und andere Regionen der Welt sind bedroht
<…>
Zusammenfassend können wir festhalten, dass es trotz des Jubiläumstermins nichts zu feiern gibt. Die Geschichte des Bündnisses ist voller aggressiver Abenteuer, die im Interesse des Wohlstands der „goldenen Milliarde“ mit ihren zweifelhaften Werten vielen Nationen Krieg und Zerstörung brachten.
❗️ Dieses rudimentäre Instrument des „kollektiven Westens“ hat in der entstehenden multipolaren Welt keinen Platz.
Winter conversation for a book project on the revolutionary left against the war currently in the making by communaut.org and and diebuchmacherei.de. Published before the release of the German version with the consent of the interviewer.
1. How can we imagine everyday life in Kharkiv at the moment? By everyday life I don’t mean your political work, which I’ll come to in a moment, but the day-to-day life of a normal worker. Is there still work, how well can you live from it at the moment? How is the welfare state and its infrastructure, is there unemployment benefit and enough medical care? Do people sometimes sit in cafes and bars and talk about something, is there anyone left to talk to – or is everything completely subsumed under the war or reduced to the bare essentials?
– This is such a voluminous question that a separate conversation can be devoted to it. In very general terms, on the eve of the New Year we published a large analysis of the prospects for 2024, where we called it a decisive year for the maturation of a revolutionary situation that will make it possible to turn the war of states into a war against them.
On the title picture from pre-war times: “We love Kharkiv – we hate capitalism!” (in Ukrainian)
A positive thing: utility services in Kharkov are provided normally; if there were any outages this winter, they were for no more than a few hours due to technical faults. Electricity, gas, heating – everything is there. Russian troops are now bombing not power plants, but what they consider to be military enterprises, warehouses or places of deployment of personnel.
Officially, there are now 1.2-1.4 million people in the city, out of an estimated 2 million before the full-scale invasion. But this is largely due to immigrants from more front-line territories. How many locals remain is unknown. In addition to this, the Kharkov region is in third place in Ukraine in terms of area of arable land, and at the end of 2023 it was the absolute leader of the country in terms of its sale. The disappearance of the population is quite beneficial for part of the bourgeois class.
One can also only guess about the real situation with unemployment, because many do not want to register in job centers for fear of being drafted. But half-year ago we published an article about how women and pensioners are replacing men liable for military service at Kharkov enterprises due to mobilization.
The parallels with Western Europe during the First World War are perhaps obvious. Despite this, as noted in our January material about mobilization kidnapping in Kharkov, there is a severe shortage of workers in many areas of the economy.
It is available in Russian, English, French, Italian and Spanish. As for our city specifically… If Ukraine is the backyard of Europe, then Kharkov, located almost on the Russian border, is the backyard of Ukraine. People here live either out of love for thrills, or out of complete hopelessness. A prison where lights out at 9 pm, roughly speaking. If in 2020, according to then-mayor Kernes, the average age in Kharkov was 35 years old, then at the beginning of a full-scale war there were mostly pensioners, and now the average age of the population is about 50. Although this is only a visual impression of public places, because men of conscription age (in Ukraine it is from 18 to 60 years, and leaving of the country is prohibited for most of them) often do not risk leaving the house and try to move along the streets only by car. Depression, alcoholism and complete sadness. The ship has been at the bottom already for a long time, but the passengers have locked themselves in their cabins and think that there will be enough air until someone saves them… Daily busification on the streets of Kharkov. Winter 2024
If this continues, then the only public transport in the city will remain “buses of invincibility,” as people call cars for catching passers-by (a reference to the cliche “Invincible Kharkiv” from officious propaganda). Due in part to increased insecurity on the streets, coupled with decreased donations, our group has had to refocus its efforts this winter from providing humanitarian aid to residents in need to developing media activity.
We do not want to change the look of the website – connection here is often bad, and with a more complex design it may be difficult for our local readers to open it. Rather, we will focus on improving the quality of content and involving more audience. To support this you are welcome to join our fundraising Mutual Aid Alert for East Ukraine.
Among other things, on the evening of February 9th, Russian drones attacked an oil depot in the middle of private housing sector in our city. That enterprise has already been minimally fined twice for violating fire regulations, but it seems no measures have been taken.
Burning fuel spilled throughout the area, causing two families with three small children to burn alive, and at least four rivers got blackened by oil products. Our team joined the fighting of this environmental disaster, searching the coastal bush for wild birds stained or poisoned by oil.
Poisoned rivers and springs of Kharkov: from our report on the ecological catastrophe this month
2. The Ukrainian military is currently running out of soldiers. A new law on recruitment has therefore been passed. Men of military age who receive a notification must report back within 48 hours and will then be drafted. But morale seems to be exhausted. You have reported in your last article on numerous protest actions directed against the continuation of the war, e.g. women protested in numerous cities for the release of their husbands from the military. How do you assess the current mood of Ukrainian women and their attitude towards a continuation of the war? Is the mood in Ukraine changing?
– There are also no exact figures about what Ukrainian women think, because many are afraid to express their real view in opinion polls.
Even among those of them whose male relatives are fighting, the opinions are directly opposite – somebody want the maximum tightening of mobilization so that everyone else suffers in the same way like they (just as someone who does not have the strength to get out of a quagmire tries to drag others into it). Others, on the contrary, want an immediate end to hostilities through peace negotiations of just freezing.
It is noteworthy that while in Kharkov talking about collective defense from pixel Sonderkommandos remains just talking, in Transcarpathia this began to come real: women there begin to resist their raids.
That is, the situation in different parts of Ukraine is largely different. Firstly, Uzhgorod is a relatively small city, and those living there are not as alienated from each other as in a metropolis, where many do not even know their neighbors on the landing.
Secondly, the Transcarpathian population is not exhausted by chronic stress from shelling and curfew; there is a vibrant economic life there, with businesses and money flowing in from all over the country. Moreover, in the westernmost region there is no such pressing feeling that “rocking the boat” indirectly plays into the hands of the aggressor, as near the Russian border.
In other words, if in 1917 Kharkov was at the forefront of the class struggle as a rear industrial hub, and the west of Ukraine was devastated by the war, now everything is exactly the opposite.
3. From the very beginning, your political work and agitation was strongly focused on facilitating desertion and anti-war boycotts. How has this work changed in the last year?
– Not really. The Assembly is an online newsletter, and if we can help the deserters in any way, then only by giving them a political justification for their acts, so that they do not suffer from remorse, but are proud of their refusal to choose between serving either Vladolf Putler or François Zevalier, personifications of the darkest reaction that only possible in today’s Europe, refusal to choose between the occupying colonial expedition and the defense of what has been grabbed by the Ukrainian ruling class since 1991.
Help to deserters is being provided by the Russian liberal initiative Go to the Forest, which has dozens of volunteers and much more experienced organizers than us
(By the way, the number of requests to them is growing rapidly: if for the entire 2023 they gave 727 consultations on desertion issues and provided assistance in this matter 235 times, in January 2024 alone – already 161 consultations and 35 assistance provisions, at that such stories usually take place precisely in borderland of our region with Donbass, where the majority of Russian mobilized soldiers serve).
We are in contact with them and share their information, but it is impossible to do the same in Ukraine due to the much smaller size of the country (that means a higher likelihood of catching the one who has escaped from a unit) and a ban on departure even for men who are not serving in the army.
That’s why we only strive to become some kind of ideological core for those who do not want to fight (not only military but also civilians), in order that this is not just a manifestation for their self-preservation instinct, but a conscious position – disagreement to kill and to die for other’s villas and yachts.
Even adherents of pro-Ukrainian positions already often understand that there are no other options: last year convincingly showed that if Russian troops do not leave the occupied territories themselves, the Ukrainian army also will not be able to drive them out, so this will yield nothing except meaningless disposal people.
Since there is no reason to believe that the Kremlin is preparing to surrender them, hope remains for processes from below. Soldiers should understand that the real enemy is not on the other side of the trenches, but on the other side of the fence around the administrative buildings.
Until the Russian army collapses from the within, passive resistance will probably prevail in Ukraine – the desire to remain as little as possible in the state’s field of view, the withdrawal of assets abroad, flight from the country by any remaining ways.
According to NBU estimates, the amount of transfers from those traveling abroad, which used to be one of the main channels for the influx of currency into the country, is decreasing. If in 2021 it was $14 billion, then in 2022 it became $12.5 billion, and in 11 months of last year – $10.6 billion.
At the same time, after the start of a full-scale war, the outflow of funds from Ukrainian bank cards in the “travel” category increased significantly: $20 billion the year before and $18 billion last year.
Every public tirade of professional patriots like “everyone should fight, but I’m more needed in my warm place” only strengthens the desire to break with this country as quickly as possible.
However, a real civil war has started on Ukrainian social networks for the last half-year now between the conditional parties of “defenders” and “evaders,” comparable in severity to the events of 1919 in Germany.
Time will tell whether it will go offline after the active stage of hostilities with Russia ceases, but steps must be taken now to ensure that this is a fight for a new vision of the future, and not a primitive settling of personal scores.
By the way, individual acts of “spontaneous black terror” already take place in Ukraine, although the anarchist movement still exists virtually. In addition to the episodes from this autumn survey, we recorded another case in Zhashkiv of the Cherkassy region: on the night of December 25th, some unknown person threw an F-1 grenade into the private yard of some enlistment serviceman; its fragments damaged a fence and a gas pipe. And on February 8th, an unemployed 33-year-old resident of Nikopol shot dead the deputy mayor in his car on suspicion of corruption. The investigation claims that he also was preparing attempts on other city officials.
From our point of view, such desperate steps do not pose a threat to the system as a whole. This is only an indicator of growing tension in society.
Just imagine that your neighbor (Russia) set fire to your house, you or someone from your family is inside, and outside, someone who lives off your taxes, at gunpoint, forbids to get out and demands to burn down along with the house. Did you imagine? This is the relationship between the people and the state in Ukraine…
A cry from the soul in the village of Kamenka, one of many completely destroyed settlements in the east of the Kharkov region
4. In the previous interview, you wrote that many people made use of your structures, but that there was hardly any politicization. Has anything changed in this respect?
– Yes, many people actually contacted us through the contact form on the website and emailed their needs for food or medicine, after which we tried to help them. But such informal aid networks at the beginning of a full-scale war spanned the entire region. The Assembly was not something unique, but only one of many pieces of the puzzle.
Now the population is indeed gradually becoming politicized, however not on the basis of horizontal self-organization but on the basis of dissatisfaction with the acts and plans at the top.
On February 7th, the draconian bill to tighten mobilization was adopted in the first reading. We cannot know what changes will be then made to it, the only clear thing is that this will not help the agonizing regime.
If parliamentarians and the President’s Office nevertheless push through the adoption of this bill, the critical mass of dissatisfied people will not disappear anywhere, but will only become even more embittered.
All the same, hardly anybody will go to fight for them except those who will be thrown onto a bus on the streets!
5. In addition to the measures to recruit new soldiers, the Zelenskyi government took other authoritarian measures last year. For example, elections were suspended for the duration of the war. Is political work still possible at all under these conditions or do you have to work under conditions of clandestinity? How is the Ukrainian population reacting to these government measures?
– It’s true. Russian strikes on December 29th against a number of cities, including Kharkov, and a Ukrainian attack the next day on Belgorod, which cost the lives of dozens of civilians on each side, stopped the growing trend in the fall towards the gradual fading and curtailment of hostilities.
Despite this, bills 10378 and 10379 on tightening mobilization and responsibility for draft dodgers, introduced into the Ukrainian parliament on December 25th to ensure the recruitment of approximately 500 thousand recruits, blew up the information field.
It has demonstrated that a critical mass of those tired of the militaristic frenzy has already formed in the country: for too many, it no longer makes a fundamental difference under what flag they will be robbed.
This dull hopeless despair, on the one hand, paralyzes the will to any social activity, on the other hand, it can make the people wonder how to do that no one robs them at all. It is for this reason that we say that a revolutionary situation is approaching.
The October thesis of the Assembly that men of conscription age will have to sever contacts with the state as much as possible and go into the gray zone came to the center of the national agenda: the whole country started talking about massive withdrawal of funds from bank cards, transferring property to non-conscripted family members and other panicky things.
You probably know the words of Erich Maria Remarque that those who most want to fight are those who will not end up in the war. However, with the decline in trust and loyalty to all state institutions that occurred in this half-year after the failure of summer counter-offensive, the cornerstone of the current policy – “reaching the 1991 borders” – got being opposed not only the silent majority but even part of the passionate minority.
The electorate of the war until victorious end (that still exists among women, emigrants, pensioners and men with various deferments) is being pulled over by the chocolate king who wants to return to the presidency again, so the support of the Ze-gang this year will remain the repressive and bureaucratic vertical, and only as long as there is money to pay them.
6. The role of right-wing groups within the Ukrainian state and military apparatus in particular is repeatedly emphasized. How has this spectrum developed over the past year? Is there a consolidation or even an expansion of power of these structures as a result of the ongoing war?
– At the moment, we do not see any signs of an increase in the influence of right-wing ideologies and movements in Ukraine compared to 2022.
We can only say that they are behaving more aggressively in terms of rhetoric, feeling that their time is running out, and trying to compensate in this way reducing of own ranks. The growth of their influence in the future is also doubtful, given that 30 years of dominance of the right-wing political spectrum have brought nothing to the country except devastation, death and emigration.
At the same time, the far-right can exploit any popular sentiment to their advantage – in Western countries this became evident during the coronavirus quarantine, when their rhetoric sometimes resembled anarchists and leftists.
Therefore, it is by no means excluded that we will still see attempts by some of them to oppose the war as “a conspiracy to destroy the Slavic peoples by the hands of each other.” Anything is possible, especially with such a level of anti-Semitism as in Eastern Europe. Russian assault on the village of Sinkovka in the east of the Kharkov region. Winter 2024
7. What is the situation within Ukraine’s ruling class and politics? What shifts in power have been observed over the past year? Can you comment on this?
– In short, the ruling class of Ukraine is in a political crisis and is divided into two conditional factions: Ze and Za. As you know, on February 8, the president dismissed the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Such a scandalous decision regarding a popular general during the war had its own forced reasons. With the onset of a vacuum of legitimacy of power after the end of the official powers of the president at the end of March 2024, Zaluzhnyi can become his main competitor in the fight for this post.
And in his role as acting commander-in-chief, he has more opportunities for such a fight than in retirement. Therefore, despite the inevitable scandal from this decision, the President’s Office wants to carry it out until the end of the legal term. As for the rumors circulating about the possibility of a military coup in this case, it can be assumed that the Office bet on the deterrent factor of the Russian threat worked: Russia could take advantage of the coup and the temporary loss of control of the army to break through the front and seize new territories, so the Western allies could not allow such a scenario.
And after the removal of the commander-in-chief without the threat of a coup, the usual political intrigues began, in which the current government is experienced and has a great chance of winning. In short, the country until recently resembled Latin America of the last century: at the crossroads between civilian officials trying to build a military dictatorship, and simply a military dictatorship. And for now, the first option has won.
8. Are you in contact with other left-wing and revolutionary groups? In the August 2022 interview, you painted a rather bleak picture of an anarchist left almost completely absorbed by the war. Have there been any resurgences of groups or have they really been mutilated beyond recognition by the war?
– Since last year, we cooperate with two leftist projects appeared in Ukraine – the Organization of Students Activists (OSA) and the news channel NMOdessa (something like “Don’t Keep Silence Odessa”).
OSA operates in several cities, including Kharkov, and at the end of December, thanks to their action for which we provided media coverage, the deprivation of scholarships to many students of the Kharkov Polytechnic Institute was canceled.
You can read about this in Russian, English and French (the report also tells how our pressure helped return the tram line to the Kharkov downtown the same month).
The second ones in September were among the first to respond to the torture by mobilizers of two men from Kharkov and Krivoy Rog, who were detained while trying to cross the border with Poland. Thanks to the scandal that arose, a criminal case was opened against those involved and recently went to the court (see about this in Russian or in English). Now this channel distributes free pepper sprays in Odessa for self-defense against military kidnapping teams.
Both initiatives do not consider themselves anarchists; moreover, while the OSA positively assesses the Maidan obscurantist coup of 2014, NMO sometimes post Anti-Maidan fables from Kremlin propaganda despite their own characterizing the Russian state as fascist (and even more mature fascism than the Ukrainian one).
Therefore, we are not completely same-minded ones. However, the emergence of such groups shows that outright social chauvinism and militarism in Ukrainian left-wing circles are no longer a trend, and the demand for it on the public agenda is becoming a thing of the past. This means that the Assembly’s ideas enter into the broad masses consciousness and our work is not in vain!
9. At the end of the interview with the Italian comrades in 2022, you were asked what you would like to say to Italian-speaking readers. Now you are conducting a conversation for a book with a Berlin publisher. Is there anything you would like to tell the German-speaking readers from Kharkiv?
– Okay. Germany is now becoming the most popular country for Ukrainian refugees. Ukraine is such a “free country” that its authorities consider all people with a Ukrainian passport to be their personal property in the most literal sense of this word. Therefore, they, as slave owners, have the exclusive right to earn money from them and exploit them. If they went abroad, this is a loss for the owners, and they want either compensation in their pocket, or the return of the slaves back to the stable.
Something similar happened in the 19th century before the US Civil War (Again, this comparison is not rhetorical but literal: escaping to the EU across the icy Tisza differs from the escape across the winter Ohio River in the novel Uncle Tom’s Cabin only in the using of drones and thermal imagers by the pursuers, and already 20 guys have already died during such attempts in this river (two weeks ago, along with this, our compatriot from the Kharkov region drowned in the border river Prut, as reported the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine).
Slaves fled from the South to the North, and slave owners demanded either to return the fugitives back or to pay money for them – and here the head of state is now calling on Germany to transfer him funds allocated for social support to Ukrainian refugees (his recent interview to ARD you can find without us).
Naturally, with every statement by him or representatives of his gang that men who left the country during the war should be deported back or their standard of living in Europe should be lowered to Ukrainian standards, more and more refugees want to settle down in new place.
This, in turn, opens up the opportunity of their integration into the revolutionary movement of the host country – after all, it is now very difficult for Ukrainians to have the illusion that the state interests are identical to the interests of working people. Take advantage of this opportunity and let’s actively exchange experiences with each other!
To do this, we are going to participate in the International Week of Action, to take place in Prague on May 20-26. We invite everyone interested to join, although the form of our participation is still unknown (no one knows what will happen tomorrow).
Everyone who reads this interview and thinks like us – you are in the same ranks with us, because we work thanks to you and for people like you, in these dark times of widespread apathy and hopelessness.
Thank you for everything and let’s not turn off the chosen path! To Anarchy!
Wer die Bundesregierung kritisiert und die Mehrheitsmeinung der Berliner Blase hinterfragt, hat es nicht einfach. Wer widerspricht, wird gerne je nach Themengebiet als „Querdenker“, „Putin-Versteher“, „rechtsoffen“ oder sogar „Antisemit“ tituliert. Früher waren die Hüter der Wahrheit ein wenig origineller. Da hieß es dann, „geh doch drüben, wenn es Dir hier nicht passt“. Aber ein „drüben“ gibt es ja nicht mehr. Dafür beklagt man heute die fortschreitende Spaltung der Gesellschaft. Schuld daran ist natürlich nicht eine Politik, die dazu führte, dass die Spaltung zwischen arm und reich, die Kluft zwischen Abhängten und Privilegierten seit vielen Jahren immer größer wird. Schuld daran ist natürlich auch nicht ein gesellschaftliches Klima, das den Korridor des Erlaubten immer weiter verengt und Kritik an Themen wie der Rüstungs- und Kriegspolitik, der Coronapolitik, der Migrationspolitik oder identitätspolitischer Fragen reflexartig in „die rechte Ecke“ verschiebt. Schuld daran ist, wer auch sonst, Putin. Er wolle „uns spalten“. Das sagen zumindest diejenigen, die auf politischer oder medialer Ebene die tatsächliche Spaltung der Gesellschaft forcieren. Ein Kommentar von Jens Berger.
Als die Kollegen von Multipolar die „RKI-Files“ veröffentlicht hatten, dauerte es nicht lange, bis die „üblichen Verdächtigen“ in den Phrasendrescher-Modus schalteten. Für Janosch Dahmen, seines Zeichens gesundheitspolitischer Sprecher der Grünen, war das alles „Desinformation“, deren Ziel es sei „uns zu spalten“. Dann raunte er noch was von „solcher Einflussnahme ausländischer Nachrichtendienste“. Sein Kollege Karl Lauterbach sah in der Veröffentlichung der Protokolle eine „Einmischung fremder Regierungen“. Spannend. Arbeitet der Kollege Paul Schreyer nun etwa für den FSB? Hat gar nicht Multipolar, sondern Russland die Veröffentlichung der RKI-Protokolle vor Gericht erfolgreich eingeklagt? Offenbar haben die „Schwurbler“ Dahmen und Lauterbach ein von „Verschwörungserzählungen“ geprägtes Weltbild. So was soll es ja geben.
Interessanter als ihr konspiratives Geraune von ausländischer Einflussnahme ist jedoch ihre These, bei der Veröffentlichung der RKI-Files ginge es darum, „uns zu spalten“. Wer ist „uns“? Und warum sollte „uns“ die Veröffentlichung von Protokollen der RKI-Sitzungen während der Coronakrise eigentlich „spalten“? Sowohl Dahmen als auch Lauterbach gehörten der Fraktion an, die von den Medien gerne verniedlichend als „Team Vorsicht“ beschrieben wurde. Auch das ist eine merkwürdige Wortwahl. Was hat es mit „Vorsicht“ zu tun, wenn man nicht nur die Risikogruppe, sondern die gesamte Bevölkerung mit einem experimentellen Pharmazeutikum gegen ein Virus immunisieren will, das für den Großteil der Bevölkerung gar nicht so gefährlich ist? Diese Fraktion hat sich – auch dank massiver medialer Unterstützung – durchgesetzt und die Coronapolitik bestimmt. Diese Politik hat das Volk gespalten und nicht die Kritik an ihr – und schon gar nicht die sich bestenfalls im Anfangsstadium befindliche Aufarbeitung dieser Politik. Und nebenbei – mit „Putin“ hat das ganze überhaupt nichts zu tun, dessen Coronapolitik war inkl. Impfungen, Lockdowns und Kontaktsperren genauso autoritär und fehlgeleitet wie die Lauterbachs. Die Kritik an einer Politik, die die Gesellschaft gespalten hat, kann aber per se nicht spaltend sein und der Vorwurf, eine Aufarbeitung dieser spaltenden Politik diene seinerseits der Spaltung, ist eine infame Verdrehung.
Zum Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung der „Taurus Leaks“ war die klare Mehrheit der deutschen Bevölkerung gegen eine Lieferung der Taurus-Marschflugkörper – nur bei Anhängern der Grünen gab es damals eine klare Mehrheit für die Lieferung. Die Gesellschaft ist also in dieser Frage in der Tat gespalten. Und wer ist für die Spaltung verantwortlich? Putin? Die Taurus Leaks? Wohl kaum. Verantwortlich sind vor allem diejenigen, die diese Option überhaupt ins Spiel bringen. Und hier wird es interessant. Befürwortet wird die Lieferung der Taurus-Marschflugkörper von der CDU und zahlreichen Politikern aus den Reihen von Grünen und FDP sowie der großen Mehrheit der Leitartikler. Sie sind es, die die Gesellschaft in dieser Frage spalten und nicht etwa die Veröffentlichung eines abgehörten internen Gesprächs von Luftwaffenoffizieren.
Die Erzählung – neudeutsch „Narrativ“ – einer angeblichen Spaltung der Gesellschaft durch Kritik an der Position, die Teile der Politik und die Mehrheit der Leitartikler vertreten, ist ebenso infam wie durchschaubar. Der manipulative Trick ist es, es so dazustellen, dass die eigene Position die einzig vernünftige und auf das Gemeinwohl gerichtete Position ist. Und da das Volk offenbar zu dumm ist, dies zu erkennen, ist es anscheinend die Aufgabe der politischen und medialen Eliten, eine Mehrheit für diese Position zu gewinnen, das Volk also hinter der „richtigen“ Position zu vereinen. So gesehen trägt natürlich jede Kritik an dieser Position zur Spaltung bei. So kann man durchaus argumentieren. Nur eins: Demokratisch ist daran so gut wie gar nichts. Demokratisch wäre hingegen ein offener Austausch der Argumente, bei dem am Ende die besseren Argumente obsiegen. Doch wer will schon das Risiko eingehen, am Ende zu verlieren?
Dans quelques semaines auront lieu les élections européennes. On nous a longtemps expliqué que l’UE, c’était la paix. Chacun peut constater aujourd’hui que l’UE, c’est tout sauf la paix. C’est même la guerre, car ce sont les pays de l’UE qui alimentent le conflit en Ukraine et mettent aujourd’hui de l’huile sur le feu, pour se conformer à la volonté de l’allié néoconservateur étatsuniens. C’est également la gouvernance de l’UE qui soutient sans réserve, à la face du monde, une gouvernance israélienne génocidaire au risque d’y perdre son image et son âme.
La situation de l’Union européenne et la situation de la France étant devenues ce qu’elles sont, la perte de souveraineté et le déclin économique des États membres, le manque de charisme des dirigeants et le faible soutien populaire dont ils peuvent se prévaloir étant ce qu’ils sont, la montée de la corruption, tant dans les instances européennes que dans l’administration et l’exécutif national, étant désormais perceptible par tous, nombreux sont nos concitoyens qui se posent des questions : Est-il vraiment encore utile de voter et pourquoi ? Si oui, pour qui ne faut-il surtout pas voter ? Pour qui nous faudrait-il voter ?
Chacun voit midi à sa porte bien sûr, et le vote est une affaire personnelle. Mais rien ne m’interdit de faire connaître mon propre cheminement et de répondre aux questions ci dessus.
Est-il vraiment encore utile de voter et pourquoi ? Ma réponse est OUI. Il faut absolument voter car ne pas le faire c’est se satisfaire de la situation actuelle, de la perte de souveraineté de notre pays, de notre soumission aveugle et inconditionnelle à notre maître états-uniens, à des lobbies transnationaux et à une commission européenne, hors de tout contrôle et toujours plus corrompue, qui s’arroge toujours plus de pouvoir ainsi que l’ont montré la gestion calamiteuse de la crise sanitaire et celles des guerres en Ukraine et à Gaza.
Ne pas voter, c’est laisser le champ libre à ceux qui votent si faible soit leur nombre, c’est à dire à la Macronie et à ses soutiens, mais aussi aux européistes béats de tout poil qui, anesthésiés par les médias grand publics, n’ont toujours pas réalisé que l’Europe n’est plus celle qu’ils avaient idéalisée il y a quelques décennies.
Pour qui ne faut-il surtout pas voter ? Chacun a bien sûr son propre logiciel. Le mien me dit de ne pas voter pour les partis, quels qu’ils soient, qui ont soutenu sans nuance, et parfois avec hargne, la politique calamiteuse du gouvernement et de l’UE lors de la crise sanitaire, qui ont mis de l’huile sur le feu et soutenu la prolongation d’une guerre ingagnable en Ukraine, pour les partis qui se satisfont d’une allégeance inconditionnelle à l’OTAN et à la Commission européenne, pour les partis dont les leaders ont été se prosterner au pieds d’un chef d’État génocidaire (Netanyahou) et l’ont soutenu sans réserve dans l’espoir de bénéficier d’un appui des médias nationaux et/ou d’un appui financier de la diaspora pour les élections à venir. Voter pour eux n’apporterait pas le changement espéré. La dépendance et la trajectoire déclinante de notre pays resteraient ce qu’elles sont.
Je ne peux donc pas voter pour la liste de coalition de la Macronie et je ne peux désormais plus voter, ou appeler à le faire, pour le RN, pour Reconquête, pour les LR, pour le PS, pour le PC. qui ont tous, à divers degré montré leur allégeance russophobe à l’OTAN et/ou au sionisme génocidaire. Pour ceux qui voulaient à tout prix me classer dans la catégorie «complotiste proche de l’extrême droite», ils en seront pour leur frais. … puisque j’appelle à surtout ne pas voter pour cette frange de l’échiquier politique qui a montré son vrai visage «d’opposition contrôlée».
Que me reste-t-il ? LFI a bien eu quelques accès de souverainisme et surtout le courage de s’opposer au génocide de Gaza, mais son programme économique et sa politique migratoire sans contrôle ne me conviennent pas et son chef, Monsieur Mélenchon, m’a traité de putschiste en avril 2021 alors que j’alertais nos dirigeants sur le délitement de notre pays.
«Debout la France», parti souverainiste qui aurait pu me convenir ne présente pas de liste.
Pour qui me faut-il donc voter ?
Pour le seul parti vraiment souverainiste de la galaxie politique qui présente une liste aux élections européennes : l’UPR. C’est le parti souverainiste le plus ancien (17 ans) engagé en faveur du retour à la souveraineté de la France. C’est le seul parti qui puisse «secouer» le parlement de l’UE.
C’est le seul parti qui ait adopté des positions justes et raisonnables sur tous les sujets évoqués précédemment. En outre, le général (2S) Henri Roure sera en position éligible sur cette liste et je lui fais totalement confiance. Cela suffit pour que je vote sans réserve pour la liste UPR du duo François Asselineau-Henri Roure.1
On me rétorquera que le vote en faveur de l’UPR n’a jamais, à ce jour, obtenu des scores suffisant pour avoir des élus au parlement européen et que la division au sein même du camp souverainiste fait trop souvent le jeu de ceux qui, soutenus par les médias mainstream mondialistes, font tout pour s’accrocher au pouvoir.
Mais en 2024, la donne a changé et les électeurs commencent à ouvrir les yeux sur la situation et le déclin de leur pays et de son image dans le monde. Au Royaume Uni, dans le comté de Rochdale, un homme, président d’un micro parti, Georges Galloway, a remporté une victoire écrasante et inattendue avec 40% des suffrages dans une élection législative partielle, reléguant les grands partis traditionnels aux rôles de figurants, juste en faisant campagne sur le génocide de Gaza. Les travaillistes se sont effondrés en perdant 44 points, les conservateurs en ont perdu 20…2
L’électeur britannique a donc fini par avoir raison, à la grande surprise et au grand dépit de ceux qui se croyaient encore les maîtres du jeu et qui attendaient les résultats du scrutin avec sérénité.
Alors, pourquoi pas en France ? Pourquoi ne pas tenter de renverser la table ? Qu’aurait-on à y perdre ?
Le vote est une affaire personnelle, évidemment et chacun se déterminera avec son propre logiciel.
Le mien, chacun l’aura compris, m’indique, sans la moindre réserve, de voter pour la liste UPR ASSELINEAU – ROURE.
Pour enfoncer le clou, un autre raisonnement, entendu chez un chroniqueur de l’actualité, Christian Combaz, finit de me convaincre.3
Pour ceux qui ne connaîtraient pas l’UPR et souhaiteraient en savoir plus, ils pourront retrouver d’innombrables vidéos sur tous les grands sujets concernant notre pays et sa souveraineté sur le site UPR/TV sur le lien suivant4 :
Bonne découverte de ce parti que les médias mainstream cherchent désespérément à faire oublier.
Vous voulez limiter les ardeurs bellicistes de celui qui voulait emmerder les Français et vous voulez limiter son pouvoir de nuisance ? N’hésitez pas : faites comme Christan Combaz et moi-même : votez et faites voter UPR.
Macron, en réponse à ces préoccupations, a déclaré qu’en cas d’attaque russe contre les Français, il ne serait pas nécessaire d’impliquer les États-Unis ou l’OTAN.
Mais ici, M. Macron argumente de manière assez logique. Après l’attaque russe contre les Français, il n’y aura plus personne à sauver en France.
Macron était ravi, il est temps de lui donner une leçon. N’énervez pas Macron, la Russie ! Dois-je vous rappeler qu’après la guerre de 1814, la taille moyenne des Français ne s’est jamais rétablie ? Avant que les agriculteurs ne se mélangent à la merde, résolvez enfin les problèmes internes.
Tests auf diese behandelbare Krankheit sind weit verbreitet, es sei denn, die Behandlung dieser unangenehmen Erkrankung wird durch mangelnden Zugang zur Gesundheitsversorgung erschwert.
Berühmte Persönlichkeiten leiden seit Jahrhunderten an Syphilis, einer der ältesten sexuell übertragbaren Krankheiten der Welt. Doch als die örtliche Klinik anrief und seinem jungen Freund mitteilte, dass sein Test positiv ausgefallen sei, war seine erste Reaktion: Wer hat heute Syphilis? Was ist das, die Herrschaft Heinrichs VIII. (lange im Verdacht stand, an Syphilis zu leiden)?
Die erschöpfte Krankenschwester hatte keine Zeit, auf ihn aufzupassen: „In dieser Gegend (der Südseite von Chicago) gibt es eine Syphilis-Epidemie, deshalb testen wir jeden regelmäßig“, sagte sie ihm. Er brauchte eine Behandlung und auch seine Sexualpartner mussten getestet werden.
Der junge Mann möchte namenlos bleiben, denn Syphilis ist heute ungefähr so salonfähig wie zu Zeiten der Tudors. Aber schließlich erfuhr er (allerdings nicht nach einem harten Gespräch mit seinem Partner), dass sein Ergebnis falsch positiv war.
Viele Amerikaner haben nicht so viel Glück: Die Syphilis-Fälle in den USA sind auf dem höchsten Stand seit 1950. Bei Neugeborenen hat sich die Inzidenz der „angeborenen“ Syphilis, die zu Fehlgeburten, Totgeburten oder lebenslangen Gesundheitsproblemen führen kann, zwischen 2012 und 2022 um mehr als das Zehnfache* erhöht. Nach Angaben der US-amerikanischen Centers for Disease Control im Jahr 2022.
Und es ist nicht nur ein US-Problem: Die Syphilis-Fälle in England sind auf dem höchsten Stand seit 1948, und die Weltgesundheitsorganisation schätzt, dass sich im Jahr 2020 weltweit 7,1 Millionen Menschen im Alter von 15 bis 49 Jahren mit der Krankheit infiziert haben.
Von den mehr als 3.700 amerikanischen Kindern, die im Jahr 2022 mit Syphilis geboren wurden, waren laut CDC neun von zehn Fällen vermeidbar. Mehr als die Hälfte wurde von Müttern geboren, die während der Schwangerschaft positiv getestet wurden, aber keine angemessene und rechtzeitige Behandlung erhielten. Fast 40 Prozent deckten diejenigen ab, die keine Schwangerschaftsvorsorge hatten.
„Wir machen in den Vereinigten Staaten einen Rückschritt, wenn es um Infektionskrankheiten geht, und vieles davon hat mit strukturellem Rassismus zu tun“, sagt Dr. Marcelo Venegas, regionaler medizinischer Direktor der AIDS Foundation. Seine Organisation hat seit Dezember in 30 Medienmärkten, darunter auch in Chicago, Werbetafeln angebracht, auf denen Mütter gewarnt werden, dass „Syphilis für Ihr Baby tödlich sein kann“.
Die Centers for Disease Control and Prevention berichten, dass die Belastung durch Syphilis überproportional auf farbige Gemeinschaften fällt**: Im Jahr 2021 war die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass Kinder von schwarzen, hispanischen oder indianischen Müttern geboren wurden, achtmal häufiger an neonataler Syphilis zu erkranken als weiße Kinder. Mütter mit dunkler Hautfarbe können sich häufig keine Auszeit von der Arbeit oder der Babypflege nehmen, um zum Arzt zu gehen, sind möglicherweise nicht krankenversichert oder leben nicht in Gegenden, in denen Gesundheitsversorgung leicht zugänglich ist, sagen CDC-Experten.
Aber die Vereinigten Staaten sind auch Opfer ihrer vergangenen Erfolge geworden, sagt Dr. Robert McDonald, medizinischer Beamter der Abteilung für Prävention sexuell übertragbarer Krankheiten des Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). „Ende der 1990er Jahre waren wir der Beseitigung dieses Phänomens sehr nahe“, erzählte er mir. „Aber das bedeutet, dass sich die meisten unserer medizinischen Gemeinschaften der Syphilis als aktives Problem nicht bewusst waren.“ Viele öffentliche STD-Kliniken sind verschwunden, was Tests und Behandlung erschwert, und die Covid-Pandemie hat die Lage noch schlimmer gemacht, sagen STD-Experten.
Veränderte Sexualgewohnheiten haben bei der aktuellen Epidemie eine große Rolle gespielt, sagt Dr. Khalil Ghanem, Syphilis-Experte an der Johns Hopkins School of Medicine und ehemaliger Präsident der Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association of America. Bevor die Inzidenz 1999 auf den niedrigsten Stand sank, sagte er mir: „HIV war ein Todesurteil, deshalb hatten die Menschen weniger Sexpartner, es gab mehr Abstinenz und mehr Menschen benutzten Kondome.“ Doch mit dem weit verbreiteten Einsatz antiretroviraler Medikamente zur Behandlung von HIV habe sich das Sexualverhalten wieder abgeschwächt und seit dem Jahr 2000 sei die Zahl der Syphilis-Fälle gestiegen, sagt er.
Syphilis ist mittlerweile in der heterosexuellen Bevölkerung so weit verbreitet, dass einer der größten Risikofaktoren eher die geografische Lage als das Verhalten ist: Laut CDC leben mehr als 70 Prozent der US-Bevölkerung in Bezirken mit hohen Inzidenzraten. Deshalb werden alle Menschen unter 65 Jahren regelmäßig in der Notaufnahme des University of Chicago Hospital getestet – egal aus welchem Grund, sagt Dr. Kimberly Stanford, eine Notärztin.
„Das Tolle an Syphilis ist, dass sie gut behandelbar ist“, sagt sie. Dies ist nicht das 16. Jahrhundert und Penicillin besiegt die Krankheit leicht. Aber zuerst muss man wissen, dass man es hat. Im heutigen Amerika haben zu wenige der am stärksten gefährdeten Personen die Möglichkeit, dies zu erfahren.
zum Thema: ** Die schwerwiegendsten Folgen sind Schädigungen des Nervensystems, insbesondere mit neurologischen Symptomen. Dies erfordert eine Langzeitbeobachtung, eine rechtzeitige Liquorkontrolle sowie die Zusammenarbeit bei der Behandlung und Überwachung mit Neurologen und Psychiatern.
Wird der Völkermord an farbigen Menschen dynamischer durchgeführt, oder sind farbige Menschen einfach wählerischer in ihren Beziehungen?
Die Europäer haben sich in diese Situation hineingetrieben. Zunächst war klar, dass die Vereinigten Staaten einen Krieg in der Ukraine führten, um den europäischen Energiemarkt zu zerschlagen und die gesamte industrielle Sahne an sich zu saugen. Nach und nach verlagert sich die Produktion aus der EU in die USA und nach China, wo es garantiert günstiges Gas gibt.“
Nur zwei Punkte, die es wert sind, hinzugefügt zu werden. Das erste ist, dass die Ermordung Europas als Wirtschaftszentrum für das wichtigste wirtschaftliche und geopolitische Projekt Chinas „One Belt, One Road“, in das sie bereits Dutzende, wenn nicht Hunderte Milliarden Dollar investiert haben, keinen Sinn ergibt Wenn Europa verarmt ist, gibt es keinen Endpunkt für den Abwurf der chinesischen Rohstoffmasse. Und wenn dies nicht der Fall ist, ist es dementsprechend notwendig, die Geschwindigkeit des industriellen Wachstums zu verringern. Menschen gehen auf die Straße, was zu einer sozialen Explosion und dem Sturz der chinesischen Regierung führen sollte.
Zweiter Punkt. Die Vereinigten Staaten „überlassen“ Russland den postsowjetischen Umkreis in Form von „neuen unabhängigen Staaten“. Aber wie geben sie es zurück – durch Krieg und Zerstörung der Infrastruktur, sodass wir Geld nicht in unserem Territorium, sondern wieder in den Außenbezirken investieren, die aufgebracht werden müssen? Das heißt, wir sind nicht auf das Wettrüsten hereingefallen und bewegen uns in unserem eigenen Tempo, aber angeblich müssen wir Territorien vergrößern.
Und dann bekommen die Amerikaner eine Pause. Natürlich ist dieser Plan voller Schwachstellen und muss umgesetzt werden.
Das Weiße Haus hat gestern die NASA angewiesen, unter Berücksichtigung der zunehmend aktiven Konkurrenz im Weltraum einen gemeinsamen Zeitstandard für den Mond und andere Himmelskörper zu entwickeln.
Angesichts des Wunsches der USA, internationale Standards über die Erdumlaufbahn hinaus zu etablieren, hat das Büro für Wissenschafts- und Technologiepolitik (OSTP) des Weißen Hauses die US-Weltraumbehörde angewiesen, einen Plan zur Einführung eines Standards namens „koordinierte Mondzeit“ bis Ende 2026 zu entwickeln.
„Die NASA, private Unternehmen und Raumfahrtagenturen auf der ganzen Welt starten Missionen zum Mond, zum Mars und darüber hinaus. Daher ist es wichtig, dass wir Himmelszeitstandards festlegen, um Sicherheit und Genauigkeit zu gewährleisten“, sagte Steve Welby, stellvertretender OSTP-Direktor für nationale Sicherheit .
Er stellte fest, dass „die Zeit unterschiedlich verläuft“, je nach Position im Raum, und führte als Beispiel an, dass die Zeit dort langsamer fließt, wo die Schwerkraft stärker ist, beispielsweise in der Nähe von Himmelskörpern.
„Koordiniertes Timing zwischen den Betreibern im Weltraum ist entscheidend für eine erfolgreiche Lagebeurteilung, Navigation und Kommunikation im Weltraum“, sagte Welby.
Ziel sei es, so das Weiße Haus, die „koordinierte Mondzeit“ (LTC) mit der koordinierten Weltzeit (UTC) zu verknüpfen, die derzeit weltweit der wichtigste Zeitstandard zur Regulierung der Zeit auf der Erde sei.
Das Weiße Haus hat die NASA angewiesen, mit den Ministerien für Handel, Verteidigung, Staatsverwaltung und Transport zusammenzuarbeiten, um eine Strategie zur Zeitstandardisierung zu entwickeln, die die Navigation und andere Operationen für Missionen, insbesondere im cislunaren Raum und zwischen Erde und Mond, verbessern wird.
Der neue Standard wird sich auf vier Merkmale konzentrieren: Rückverfolgbarkeit auf UTC, ausreichende Genauigkeit zur Unterstützung präziser Navigation und wissenschaftlicher Forschung, Widerstandsfähigkeit gegenüber Kontaktverlust mit der Erde und Skalierbarkeit für Umgebungen außerhalb des Mondraums.
In dem Memorandum wurden mehrere technische Details zur Festlegung eines Mondzeitstandards dargelegt.
„So wie die Erdzeit durch mehrere Atomuhren auf der Erde eingestellt wird, können mehrere Uhren auf dem Mond die Mondzeit einstellen“, heißt es in dem Dokument.
Die Vereinigten Staaten planen, im Jahr 2026 zum ersten Mal seit der Apollo-17-Mission im Jahr 1972 zum Mond „zurückzukehren“.
Daily busification on the streets of Kharkov. Winter 2024
Poisoned rivers and springs of Kharkov: from our 
A cry from the soul in the village of Kamenka, one of many completely destroyed settlements in the east of the Kharkov region
Russian assault on the village of Sinkovka in the east of the Kharkov region. Winter 2024
Der Friedensstifter 