„Der Präsident und die Regierung Nicaraguas riefen am 24. März 2024 aus Solidarität mit den Opfern des Terroranschlags in Moskau, bei dem 133 Menschen getötet und Hunderte weitere verletzt wurden, eine Staatstrauer aus. Sie drücken dem russischen Volk ihr Beileid aus und werden in allen Gemeinden Solidaritätsaktionen durchführen. Als Zeichen der Solidarität mit Russland wird die Nationalflagge auf Halbmast gehisst.
Terrorist attack in Krasnogorsk
chronicle of a Ukrainian secret operation
On March 7, 2024, the US embassy to Russia issued a security alert
The Embassy is monitoring reports that extremists have imminent plans to target large gatherings in Moscow, to include concerts, and U.S. citizens should be advised to avoid large gatherings over the next 48 hours
Krasnogorsk is a city in Moscow northwestern suburb. In the evening of March 22, 2024, a concert is sold out in Crocus City Hall, which can seat 6,200 spectators
About 10 minutes before the show, at least 4 gunmen enter the building, start shooting at unarmed people
The evacuation has begun, when the terrorists burst in the auditorium, where the slaughter is going on
None of them yell any jihadist cry. Their action is methodical. A blaze has broken out in the upper floors, when the Russian security forces storm the building, about one hour after the beginning of the attack
On social networks, Ukrainian Nazis channels and also less extremist Ukrainian nationalists are already celebrating the attack
As usual in the case of a tragic event in Russia, Ukrainian calls are overloading the Russian emergency lines with fake alerts. Russian media release the description of the car that the terrorists have used to flee
Later, Amaq publishes a first statement
A security source told Amaq agency : Islamic State fighters have attacked a large gathering of Christians in the city of Krasnogorsk, on the outskirts of the Russian capital, Moscow, killing and wounding hundreds, and causing great destruction to the place, before their safe withdrawal to their bases
Amaq is the news agency of the Caliphate, not its official channel. The statement could be opportunistic, but the afterwards will show it is not.
- March 23, 2024
The blaze is extinguished but the auditorium ceiling has collapsed. Some victims have died of asphyxiation, while they were hiding in the premises. In the morning the provisional death toll is 93
While they are on duty in Bryansk region, in order to usually prevent the infiltration of Atlanticist groups under command of the Ukrainian military intelligence (GUR), operatives of the Russian security agency (FSB) and Chechen Akhmat regiment manage to intercept and take alive four terrorists, who are attempting to seek safety in Ukraine
All are Tajik. One of them tells his recruitment, while he was attending a series of lectures on Telegram. He was enticed with an offer of half a million Russian rubles, roughly equivalent to 5,000 euros, in order to slaughter people in Crocus city hall, has received half of the reward before the attack. Amaq releases later its second statement, a usual practice, in order to prove with pictures that the assailants have been in touch with the Caliphate
The statement clarifies that the terrorists have set the building ablaze with petrol bombs.
For Andrew Napolitano’s Judging Freedom, former CIA analyst Larry Johnson is explaining the best theory so far. The terrorist attack in Moscow is a Ukrainian plot. Increasingly frustrated by unauthorized, Ukrainian blatant actions, the US knows it, were terrified for weeks.
Since Afghanistan in the 80s, the West is using the Jihadists for its geopolitical interests. The terrorist operation in Paris on November 13, 2015, was the result, the collateral damage, of the Western support to the so-called Syrian revolution, a radical Sunni uprising against the secular government in Syria. Even the Caliphate. Then Secretary of State, John Kerry explained in a recorded conversation how the US did not prevent the expansion of the Caliphate, regarded as a leverage to constrain Bashar Assad to negotiate his ouster
Known Jihadists, usually called Freedom Fighters in the West, are currently fighting in the Atlanticist ranks, under command the Ukrainian military intelligence (GUR)
Here is Rustam Azhiev, alias Abdul Hakim al Shishani [Chechen], an alive icon. In Syria in 2013, he was leading Jamaat al Khilafa al Qawqazia [Caucasian Caliphate group], a part of the Chechen jihadist formations which were fighting under command of al Nusra, a local subsidiary of al Qaeda
Besides, the Ukrainian Nazis are no less danger to the personal safety of the inhabitants of the West, especially Europe.
Vladimir Putin addresses the peoples of the Russian Federation
No one will be able to sow the poisonous seeds of discord in our multinational society
https://nicolascinquini.blog/2024/03/23/crocus-city-hall/
Meet the AI-Censored? Naked Capitalism
Google provides an early, scary test case for mechanized suppression by threatening a popular economics site with demonetization
By Matt Taibbi
Racket News
The future of AI-powered censorship is here, and the early returns are as error-filled and clumsily destructive as Google’s infamous Gemini rollout.
On March 4th, Yves Smith — nom de plume for the editor of Naked Capitalism, a popular site containing economics commentary and journalism — received an ominous letter from its ad service company:
Hope you are doing well!
We noticed that Google has flagged your site for Policy violation and ad serving is restricted on most of the pages with the below strikes…
The letter went on to list four data fields: VIOLENT_EXTREMISM, HATEFUL_CONTENT, HARMFUL_HEALTH_CLAIMS, and ANTI_VACCINATION. From there the firm explained: “If Google identifies the flags consistently and if the content is not fixed, then the ads will be disabled completely to serve on the site.”
“So this is a threat of complete demonetization,” says Smith.
She discovered a spreadsheet listing her offenses. Excerpts are reprinted below. The third image is the enhanced view of Google’s explanation for the last two entries:
Spreadsheet sent to Naked Capitalism by Google.
Naked Capitalism is run by Smith, a Harvard Business School graduate and longtime financial services sector expert. The site often tackles issues the financial press avoids and gained renown in the wake of the 2008 crash. (I appeared with Yves on a Moyers and Company show about banking years ago.) Naked Capitalism helped force the resignation of the SEC’s Director of the Office of Compliance and Inspections, Andrew Bowden when it described Bowden telling a Stanford audience containing many private equity executives how his son would like to work in private equity. Later, California Pension Fund chief Ben Meng resigned in the wake of the site’s reporting.
Naked Capitalism is a home for smart, independent commentary about a financial services industry that is otherwise almost exclusively covered by writers and broadcasters who’d jump at a job offer from the companies they cover. It’s unique, useful and full of links and primary source material. What 16 items did Google find objectionable in its archive of 33,000 posts?
- A Barnard College professor, Rajiv Sethi, evaluated Robert F. Kennedy’s candidacy and wrote, “The claim… is not that the vaccine is ineffective in preventing death from COVID-19, but that these reduced risks are outweighed by an increased risk of death from other factors. I believe that the claim is false (for reasons discussed below), but it is not outrageous.” This earned the judgment, “[AntiVaccination].” Sethi wrote his own explanation here, but this is a common feature of moderation machines; they can’t distinguish between advocacy and criticism.
- A link to “Evaluation of Waning of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine–Induced Immunity” a peer-reviewed article by the Journal of the American Medical Association, was deemed “[AntiVaccination].”
- An entry critical of vaccine mandates, which linked to the American Journal of Public Health article SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Hospitalization, and Death in Vaccinated and Infected Individuals by Age Groups in Indiana, 2021‒2022, earned [HARMFUL_HEALTH_CLAIMS, ANTI_VACCINATION, HATEFUL_CONTENT] tag.
The strangest flag of all involved a review by Tom Engelhardt of Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire by the late CIA consultant Chalmers Johnson. Engelhardt is no fan of Donald Trump, calling him “a billionaire grifter and TV impresario who thought not just unbearably well of, but only of, himself,” and assessing Trump’s presidency so harshly that he put the word “governed” in quotes. But Engelhardt was describing the Johnson book, vaguely in the same intellectual ballpark as Martin Gurri’s Revolt of the Public, which warned back in 2000 of political consequences for breeding a “military establishment that is today close to being beyond civilian control.”
In this context, Engelhardt wrote that “it’s hard not to imagine The Donald’s success as another version of blowback.” He added, “given his insistence that the 2020 election was ‘fake’ or ‘rigged’… it seems to me that we could redub him Blowback Donald.”
This entry earned the absurd DEMONSTRABLY_ FALSE_ DEMOCRATIC PROCESS judgment. Obviously, its machine was unable to distinguish commentary, even overtly negative commentary, from endorsement. “An AI could have read it as Engelhardt saying that the election was stolen, as opposed to Englehardt saying Trump said the election was stolen,” is how Smith put it.
There was some slightly more hardcore content on Google’s list — I can see how a machine might trip over a Gaza-themed spoof of the Hall and Oates song “You Make My Dreams Come True” — but algorithms appeared mostly to be going ballistic over throwaway lines, or misreading criticism as its opposite. Also, the company only offered explanations for 8 of 16 flags (really 14, as the company sent the same entry twice in one place, then listed the site’s “Technology and Innovation” category page as objectionable in another). For a site like Naked Capitalism that includes many links in each post, and posts a lot, even one non-specific complaint raises all sorts of issues.
Biden’s Hail Mary Budget Is Just Another Anchor Baby
By Tom Luongo
Last week I was contacted by Sputnik News to give some comments on “President” Biden’s $7.3 trillion budget proposal. To be honest, having to read up on what was in the budget proposal was enough to ruin my day before it even began.
But, ever your humble(sic) servant, I endeavored to persevere and what I saw was typically horrifying, as always. And my quick conclusions were that this budget is a political wish list of a dying party to buy votes however and wherever they can.
The party I’m speaking about isn’t the Democrats, it’s the Uniparty that has the Capitol under foreign control. Because nothing I see in this budget is for America’s prosperity. It is ultimately capital destructive and feeds into the needs of all of America’s enemies, foreign and domestic.
$7.3 trillion paid for with more ‘soak the rich’ taxes is throwing napalm grenades on an already burning fire. And it serves to further sell today’s Americans out for tomorrow’s anchor babies currently being invited across the border at record numbers, given billions in tax dollars to shelter them in our homes and hotels while forcibly denying that they are doing any of it.
It’s not just perverse folks, it’s intentional, with the ultimate end to drive capital away from the US towards other parts of the world. For our friends in Europe it’s clearly a mechanism to make us as bad as them.
Every day in Brussels is another day to vandalize the people of Europe and reinforce who wields real power. Every ludicrous headline I see come out of France or Germany or the Netherlands somehow always looks similar to some brain-dead idea floated by the Biden administration.
The latest, this morning, is Joe’s further assault on car manufacturers by radically upping the restrictions on emissions to the point of outlawing internal combustion vehicles.
This go-round, Biden is “preparing to roll out the toughest-ever” emissions restrictions, according to Bloomberg.
The report says that the Environmental Protection Agency is poised to implement emissions limits that (Biden thinks) could significantly boost electric vehicle sales, requiring EVs to constitute about two-thirds of new car and light truck sales by 2032, a sharp increase from less than 10% last year.
Unless, of course, people stop buying new cars.
This is yet another example of the desperate need for the Supreme Court to take up the Chevron Deference and strike it down. The agencies should not be making law. That’s Congress’ job.
And I don’t care if Congress is allergic to doing its job, new emission regulations should not be in the hands of unelected bureaucrats run by chiefs who are chosen by the current political party.
While I’m no fan of democracy, the fear of voter backlash is one of the few real world pressure points we still have as taxpayers. So, enough with these poison pills, and legislating through Executive Order. It’s time for the courts to re-establish separation of powers and slow the roll of globalists who think they have the right to tell us what to do.
Because Climate Change! SMFH.
These are things things that need to go through the legislature.
But the real problem with this current globalist wish list is that further soaking the rich to get them to “pay their fair share” will only drive capital elsewhere. As always, they sell the midwits on the first-order effects — helping you poor and downtrodden with buying a house and buying food — and not on the real effects — continuing the divestment cycle which began with these idiotic policies back during FDR.
Every time I listen to one of these pathetic pols complain about “Corporate America,” or “Wall St.,” or “Inflation” all I hear is deflection away from yesterday’s stupid policy which created today’s problems.
It does nothing but remind me that Harry Browne was right all those years ago when he said that all government really does is break your legs and then hand you a crutch. While you are limping along on that crutch they say, ‘See! Without us you wouldn’t be able to walk.”
How about we stop breaking Americans’ legs in the first place?
No. That won’t ever happen because then we might find out that it was all their fault in the first place.
The good news is, post-COVID and the horrific vaccines, that it’s become obvious to millions of people now in ways that it never had been before.
The big miscalculation with everything surrounding COVID is that it’s easy to persuade people of dumb shit when it doesn’t directly affect them. You can appeal to their logic and their left brains and turn their heads around backwards.
But when you start killing people they love you are now screwing with their hearts. When you break the compact between the government and the people so you don’t have to pay the bills, that’s when you can’t convince them you didn’t break their legs in the first place.
As always, whenever I’m contacted by Russian Media for comments I publish the entire response publicly lest anyone think I’m anyone’s bitch.
1) What’s behind such high numbers in President’s plan? How challenging would be for the US economy in its current condition to support this plan?
The budget on offer is ludicrous. Biden and his people know it. The Republicans in the House know it. This is a purely political document to try and shore up Biden’s failing numbers with his shrinking base.
It’s as tone deaf a budget proposal as I’ve ever seen from an American president. It’s a budget designed to accelerate the bankruptcy of the US. Since I consider Obama, the real power behind the throne in D.C., to be a foreign agent, this budget makes perfect sense.
The goal with this is to be so over-the-top that any negotiated settlement will still be terrible. It’s a logical extension of the Democrats’ “Soak the Rich” rhetoric of the past two decades. This time they are going to pay for their idiotic plans with destroying the capital base, putting taxes on unrealized capital gains, and more energy boondoggles whose intent is to cripple the US economy.
This is all right in line with World Economic Forum (and EU) principles to destroy competitiveness of European rival nations. This budget, in short, is meant to be a poison pill for the future, regardless of who wins the election in November.
2) Which of these proposals do you think reveal most vulnerable areas of Biden’s presidency ahead of the November presidential election?
He is proposing the same punitive measures on the American people that the IMF imposes on anyone who takes a loan from them… raise taxes, cut productivity, prioritize foreign bond holders. To this package he’s adding more support for low-income voters struggling with inflation he created to buy them off in November.
Biden and Obama can see the poll numbers. They are losing in every category. Soaking the rich and dividing the country further into ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’ is a tired strategy. Americans are simply not having any of it from a President that can only seem to spend money overseas while inviting the world in through an open border.
It refuses to address the things that people actually want to change. Jobs for American citizens. Lower energy and food costs. Less spending and less partisan politics.
3) Since the passage of the proposals requires approval from a legislature that’s currently divided on a number of issues, which President’s proposals do you expect to pass and which – to fail? Can you elaborate, why?
If I’m reading the room in D.C. properly, and that includes all aspects of foreign policy, then the real wealth of the US will move heaven and earth to ensure that almost none of this proposed budget gets through Congress.
The problem is, of course, that those behind Biden and Obama are going to do the same thing.
But, that said, the GOP majority under Speaker Mike Johnson is as thin as it can be. It will require behind-the-scenes arm-twisting of traditionally squishy Republicans and vulnerable Democrats to keep from passing.
So, that means that you can expect the ‘soak the rich’ tax proposals to be the first thing gutted. Democrats, like Elizabeth Warren, will screech about how this is intolerable because Wall St. is evil. They will also ramp up their rhetoric that the Federal Reserve must cut rates to help pay for this transition to ‘a fairer system.’
Politically, however, the mood in the US has moved away from this. Giving people money isn’t going to solve the food and energy inflation problem, which is what is driving people away from Biden. That only makes the problem worse. The one thing that we’ve done well locally is highlight the insane costs of Biden’s open border policy and he can’t overcome that with a couple of tax credits and handouts to Americans who are being passed over for jobs they are qualified for because of hiring quotas.
I see this entire budget proposal pretty much backfiring completely after what was a revelatory State of the Union address which even Biden supporters were hard-pressed to approve of.
If the House GOP is forced to compromise on anything, it will be reinstating the child tax credit.
Reprinted with permission from Gold Goats ‘n Guns.
Goodbye Google
In early April 2020, Mercola.com became one of the first websites to purposely block Google from indexing our articles and breaking news blog posts. Most of you are well aware that I’ve had concerns about the surveillance capitalists, spearheaded by Google, for a number of years.
September 2017, I discussed Google’s partnership with the National Alliance on Mental Illness, and how their depression assessment quiz was in fact a drug promotion scam sponsored by the drug manufacturer Eli Lilly. No matter how you answered the questions, you were a candidate for antidepressants.
Since then, Google and other tech companies have only gotten deeper and wider access to people’s personal medical information, and Google’s selling of this data to third parties can have real-world consequences. Higher insurance premiums or denial of employment are but two obvious examples.
Google Blocked From Interacting With Mercola.com
Most of you know that in the summer of 2019, Google removed us from coming up in any keyword search unless our name was also typed into the query. While we still received substantial traffic from people who looked very hard to find Mercola articles through Google, we finally decided to block Google from crawling or indexing any of my articles or breaking news blogs. We also stopped using the Google Analytics program in 2018.
So, everything related to Google has been removed from this site, and I hope other sites will follow suit. I encourage you to search every site’s privacy policy page to see if they use Google Analytics or Google Ad programs, and if they do, encourage them to stop.
We can be successful without the surveillance monopolies, and businesses and individuals need to unite to do everything we can to stop their dangerous privacy theft and data mining.
How You Pay for Companies’ Use of ‘Free’ Analytics
A majority of websites are using Google’s “free” analytics program, as well as their advertising platforms. Alas, those services are not actually free. Ultimately, YOU pay for them with your personal data, as that is the product Google turns around and sells to third parties. Collectively, all of these sites are stealing an enormous amount of your private information.
Google and its data-siphoning tentacles reach deep into your everyday life, collecting data on every move you make and conversation you have, whether online or in the real world.
Even if you disable location tracking on your phone, Google has ways to determine your whereabouts by tracking the addresses of nearby cellular towers that your phone connects to instead. This is one of the reasons I strongly encourage you to ditch all Android phones and use an iPhone that has better privacy policies.
I discussed this in my 2018 article, “Google — One of the Largest Monopolies in the World.” That article also includes a list of examples of the type of data collected by Google, whether you’re aware of it or not.
Our ‘Cognitive Liberties’ Are at Stake
https://youtube.com/watch?v=AHV_BxlNzmM%3Fembeds_referring_euri%3Dhttps
As detailed in “Will Google’s Social Credit System Determine Your Future?” there are now proposals suggesting all this data, in combination with artificial intelligence-enabled analytics systems could be used for “predictive policing” as illustrated in the 2002 movie “Minority Report,” where suspected perpetrators are arrested before a crime is actually committed.
In the 2018 TED Talk above,1 legal scholar and bioethicist Nita Farahany discusses the potential ramifications of mind-reading technology, warning that such technology could easily lead to “a society where people are arrested for merely thinking about committing a crime.”
Mind you, Google claimed to have the ability to read your thoughts an entire decade ago. In 2010, Google CEO Eric Schmidt boasted, “We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”2
Fast-forward 10 years, and Google’s mind-reading capabilities have exponentially grown and been perfected to the point that their AI can predict the exact moment when a teenager is feeling insecure, lonely or vulnerable, so that an advertisement for an image-boosting product can be placed in front of them on the screen in that moment.
This and many other terrifying capabilities are detailed in the book, “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism,” written by social psychologist and Harvard professor Shoshana Zuboff. The video below features an interview I did with her about this topic.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=hIXhnWUmMvw%3Fembeds_referring_euri%3Dhttps
In her TED Talk, Farahany also discusses the dangers of a world in which “private interests sell our brain data.” She believes we, as a global community, need laws protecting our rights to cognitive liberty; laws that protect our freedom of thought and self-determination.
Say Goodbye to Google
Over the years, I’ve grown exceedingly concerned about Google’s exponential data mining efforts and infiltration into every conceivable area of our everyday lives, from health care and fitness to education and finance. I believe that the best balance of utility and privacy is the new search engine deployed by the Brave browser. There is no doubt that the Brave browser and search engine should be your default.
The influence of Google is so vast yet so hidden, most people simply have no idea just how controlled they actually are. Most of us would vehemently deny that something as simple as Google search results can manipulate us into thinking a certain way about a topic, yet research clearly shows that this kind of subliminal influence is profoundly powerful.
https://www.bitchute.com/embed/HoyEBkOu7pkd/Download Interview Transcript | Video Link
Robert Epstein, Ph.D., who has spent the last decade of his professional career exposing Google’s manipulative and deceptive practices as a senior research psychologist for the American Institute of Behavioral Research and Technology, has also demonstrated how easily Google can shift our political and societal landscape.
Without Google, the technocrats’ dream of a One World Government would likely never happen, as it relies on social engineering and artificial intelligence. Google is a frontrunner and expert in both, and has the ability to control entire populations. As noted by Epstein in the interview above, Google poses three unique threats to society:
• They’re a surveillance agency with significant yet hidden surveillance powers — Google Search, Google Wallet, Google Docs, Gmail, Google Drive, YouTube — all are surveillance platforms and from Google’s perspective, the value of these platforms are their ability to glean very precise data about you as an individual. Most of these platforms offer free services for the simple reason that YOU are the product being sold to third parties.
• They’re a censoring agency with the ability to restrict or block access to websites across the internet, thus deciding what people can and cannot see. While Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act makes free speech possible for everyone, it also allows Google and other online platforms to filter out and censor whatever they want.
The most crushing problem with this kind of internet censorship is that you don’t know what you don’t know. If a certain type of information is removed from search, and you don’t know it should exist somewhere, you’ll never go looking for it. And, when searching for information online, how would you know that certain websites or pages have been removed from the search results in the first place? The answer is, you don’t.
For example, Google has been investing in DNA repositories for quite a long time, and are adding DNA information to our profiles. According to Epstein, Google has taken over the national DNA repository, but articles about that — which he has cited in his own writings — have all vanished.
• They have the power to manipulate public opinion through search rankings and other means, and the shifts in thinking produced are both rapid and enormous. For example, Epstein has demonstrated that Google has the ability to shift voting preferences among undecided voters by a whopping 48% to 63%, and the power to determine 25% of global elections. What’s more, this manipulation is entirely undetectable and untraceable.
The Many Reasons to Ditch Google
As a user, there are many reasons to de-Google your life, including the following:
Privacy concerns — Google’s services, including search, email, and maps, collect vast amounts of personal data, which can include browsing history, location data, and more. This collection is integral to their business model, which focuses on targeted advertising. Other privacy concerns include the following:
• Tracking of your whereabouts 24/7 — In 2022, four attorneys general sued Google for its deceptive practices in collecting location data, as they continue to track location data even after users disable location tracking. By tracking your Google calendar entries, combined with your location data, Google also knows what events you’ve attended, when, and for how long.
• Your built-in webcam on your phone, tablet, laptop or computer can also be accessed by various apps.
• A lifetime of photographic evidence — Twenty years ago, photos were a private matter, reminisced over in photo albums and displayed around the home. Today, people’s lives are on public display online, and Google captures it all.
When combined with facial recognition software and other technological identification applications, including metadata detailing the time and place of each snap, your photos are a treasure trove of private information.
• A lifetime of communications — Google also has every single Gmail email you’ve ever sent, received and deleted.
• Censoring your email — Google can also censor your email, and we have evidence that this is happening. While about 50% of our subscribers are using Gmail accounts, the delivery rate for Gmail accounts is HALF of all the email providers like ProtonMail — far lower than any other email service.
So, if you are using Gmail to receive our newsletter please change immediately. If you’re using Gmail, understand that they’re censoring your inbox, and you might not even realize it.
• Deleted files and information — You probably delete files and information every now and then for the sake of safety, right? You might decide to delete that list of passwords from your phone, for example, in case you lose it or it gets hacked. Well, Google still has all of that information.
Market dominance and monopolistic behavior — Google’s dominant position in search, video hosting (via YouTube), and mobile operating systems (via Android) stifles competition, potentially leading to less innovation and choice for consumers.
Data security — Although Google claims to have strong security measures, no service is immune to data breaches or security flaws. Considering the vast amount of personal data collected by Google, a data breach could be potentially devastating.
Echo chamber and filter bubble effects — Google’s personalized search and news results can create a “filter bubble,” where users are more likely to see information that aligns with their past behavior, potentially limiting exposure to differing viewpoints and leading to an echo chamber effect.
Dependence and data lock-in — Relying heavily on Google’s ecosystem can lead to a form of lock-in, where moving to other services becomes difficult due to the vast amounts of data and integration within Google’s services. To avoid this, diversify your service providers.
Dependence and data lock-in — Relying heavily on Google’s ecosystem can lead to a form of lock-in, where moving to other services becomes difficult due to the vast amounts of data and integration within Google’s services. To avoid this, diversify your service providers.
Here’s How You Can Say Goodbye to Google Today
If you are at all concerned about Google’s data theft practices, then it’s time you stop using Google services. Sure, Google has convenience covered, but it’s not enough to overshadow its many evils.
If you’re ready to protect your privacy and break free from the manipulation of internet monopolies, here are some basic steps you can take. Also, be sure to share these tips with your family and friends.
Swap out your browser — Uninstall Google Chrome and use Brave or Opera instead. Everything you do on Chrome is surveilled, including keystrokes and every webpage you’ve ever visited. Brave is a great alternative that takes privacy seriously.
Switch your search engine — Stop using Google search engines or any extension of Google, such as Bing or Yahoo, both of which draw search results from Google. Instead, use a default search engine that offers privacy, such as Presearch, Startpage, DuckDuckGo, Qwant and many others.
Use a secure email — Close your Gmail account and switch to a secure email service like ProtonMail. If you have children, don’t transfer their student Google account into a personal account once they’re out of school.
Switch to a secure document sharing service — Ditch Google Docs and use another alternative such as Zoho Office, Etherpad, CryptPad, OnlyOffice or Nuclino, all of which are recommended by NordVPN.3
Delete all Google apps from your phone and purge Google hardware. Better yet, get a de-Googled phone. Several companies now offer them, including Above Phone.
Avoid websites that use Google Analytics — To do that, you’ll need to check the website’s privacy policy and search for “Google.” Websites are required to disclose if they use a third-party surveillance tool. If they use Google Analytics, ask them to switch!
Use a secure messaging system — To keep your private communications private, use a messaging tool that provides end-to-end encryption, such as Signal.
Use a virtual private network (VPN) such as NordVPN or Strong VPN — This is a must if you seek to preserve your online privacy.
Don’t use Google Home devices in your house or apartment — These devices record everything that occurs in your home, both speech and sounds such as brushing your teeth and boiling water, even when they appear to be inactive, and send that information back to Google. The same goes for Google’s home thermostat Nest and Amazon’s Alexa.
Don’t use an Android cellphone, as it’s owned by Google.
Ditch Siri, which draws all its answers from Google.
Don’t use Fitbit, as it was recently purchased by Google and will provide them with all your physiological information and activity levels, in addition to everything else that Google already has on you.
Sources and References
- 1 YouTube TED Talk by Nita Farahany December 18, 2018
- 2 Business Insider October 4, 2010
- 3 NordVPN February 5, 2019
The Best of Dr. Joseph Mercola
Copyright © Dr. Joseph Mercola
Previous article by Dr. Joseph Mercola: Skyrocketing Male Infertility May Threaten Mankind’s Survival
Spanish Newspaper Claims NATO Troops Are Active in Ukraine; Putin Agrees
By Mac Slavo
The Spanish newspaper El Pais claimed that NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) troops are active in Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin agrees, and even further claims that soldiers from member states of the bloc are dying in large numbers.
Active and former military personnel from NATO states have long been operating in Ukraine, overseeing Kyiv’s use of Western-supplied weapons, El Pais reported on Monday, according to a report by RT.
The US-led military bloc has been involved “in virtually every possible aspect” of the hostilities aside from active combat operations, the Spanish newspaper claimed. That includes supplying weapons, providing targeting information, and training Ukrainian soldiers inside the country, El Pais reported, citing interviews conducted throughout the conflict.
Putin also claims that NATO troops are involved in Ukraine and are being killed by the Russian military. This is not the first time Putin has made this allegation.
Speaking to his supporters and the media on Sunday night after his landslide presidential election victory, Putin stressed that Moscow is well aware of calls in the US-led military bloc to potentially deploy troops to Ukraine.
“We hear both French and English speech there. There is nothing good in this, first of all for them, because they die there and in large numbers,” he said.
Last month, tyrant and French President Emmanuel Macron suggested that the West “cannot exclude” the possibility of sending soldiers to aid Ukraine. He later described Russia as an “adversary,” insisting, however, that Paris is not “waging war on” Moscow.
Commenting on Macron’s remarks, Putin noted that while NATO troops in Ukraine are expected to act as an auxiliary force, helping Kiev train its military, “this is not much different from what mercenaries are doing there now.” Russia, he added, wants France not to escalate the conflict but to help find a peaceful solution to hostilities. –RT
Moscow still views the Ukraine conflict as a US-led proxy war against Russia, in which Ukrainians serve as “cannon fodder” for Western interests. It considers foreigners fighting for Kiev as “mercenaries” who are doing the bidding of Western governments.
Reprinted with permission from SHTFplan.
The Best of Mac SlavoMac Slavo [
send him mail] is a small business owner and independent investor.
Copyright © SHTFplan
It’s War: The Real Meat Grinder Starts Now
No more shadow play. It’s now in the open. No holds barred.
Exhibit 1: Friday, March 22, 2024. It’s War. The Kremlin, via Peskov, finally admits it, on the record.
The money quote:
“Russia cannot allow the existence on its borders of a state that has a documented intention to use any methods to take Crimea away from it, not to mention the territory of new regions.”
Translation: the Hegemon-constructed Kiev mongrel is doomed, one way or another. The Kremlin signal: “We haven’t even started” starts now.
Exhibit 2: Friday afternoon, a few hours after Peskov. Confirmed by a serious European – not Russian – source. The first counter-signal.
Regular troops from France, Germany and Poland have arrived, by rail and air, to Cherkassy, south of Kiev. A substantial force. No numbers leaked. They are being housed in schools. For all practical purposes, this is a NATO force.
That signals, “Let the games begin”. From a Russian point of view, Mr. Khinzal’s business cards are set to be in great demand.
Exhibit 3: Friday evening. Terror attack on Crocus City, a music venue northwest of Moscow. A heavily trained commando shoots people on sight, point blank, in cold blood, then sets a concert hall on fire. The definitive counter-signal: with the battlefield collapsing, all that’s left is terrorism in Moscow.
And just as terror was striking Moscow, the US and the UK, in southwest Asia, was bombing Sana’a, the Yemeni capital, with at least five strikes.
Some nifty coordination. Yemen has just clinched a strategic deal in Oman with Russia-China for no-hassle navigation in the Red Sea, and is among the top candidates for BRICS+ expansion at the summit in Kazan next October.
Not only the Houthis are spectacularly defeating thalassocracy, they have the Russia-China strategic partnership on their side. Assuring China and Russia that their ships can sail through the Bab-al-Mandeb, Red Sea and Gulf of Aden with no problems is exchanged with total political support from Beijing and Moscow.
The sponsors remain the same
Deep in the night in Moscow, before dawn on Saturday 23. Virtually no one is sleeping. Rumors dance like dervishes on countless screens. Of course nothing has been confirmed – yet. Only the FSB will have answers. A massive investigation is in progress.
The timing of the Crocus massacre is quite intriguing. On a Friday during Ramadan. Real Muslims would not even think about perpetrating a mass murder of unarmed civilians under such a holy occasion. Compare it with the ISIS card being frantically branded by the usual suspects.
Let’s go pop. To quote Talking Heads: “This ain’t no party/ this ain’t no disco/ this ain’t no fooling around”. Oh no; it’s more like an all-American psy op. ISIS are cartoonish mercenaries/goons. Not real Muslims. And everyone knows who finances and weaponizes them.
That leads to the most possible scenario, before the FSB weighs in: ISIS goons imported from the Syria battleground – as it stands, probably Tajiks – trained by CIA and MI6, working on behalf of the Ukrainian SBU. Several witnesses at Crocus referred to “Wahhabis” – as in the commando killers did not look like Slavs.
It was up to Serbia’s Aleksandar Vucic to cut to the chase. He directly connected the “warnings” in early March from American and British embassies directed at their citizens not to visit public places in Moscow with CIA/MI6 intel having inside info about possible terrorism, and not disclosing it to Moscow.
The plot thickens when it is established that Crocus is owned by the Agalarovs: an Azeri-Russian billionaire family, very close friends of…
… Donald Trump.
Talk about a Deep State-pinpointed target.
ISIS spin-off or banderistas – the sponsors remain the same. The clownish secretary of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine, Oleksiy Danilov, was dumb enough to virtually, indirectly confirm they did it, saying on Ukrainian TV, “we will give them [Russians] this kind of fun more often.”
But it was up to Sergei Goncharov, a veteran of the elite Russia Alpha anti-terrorism unit, to get closer to unwrapping the enigma: he told Sputnik the most feasible mastermind is Kyrylo Budanov – the chief of the Main Directorate of Intelligence at the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense.
The “spy chief” who happens to be the top CIA asset in Kiev.
It’s got to go till the last Ukrainian
The three exhibits above complement what the head of NATO’s
military committee, Rob Bauer, previously told a security forum in Kiev: “You need more than just grenades – you need people to replace the dead and wounded. And this means mobilization.”
Translation: NATO spelling out this is a war until the last Ukrainian.
And the “leadership” in Kiev still does not get it. Former Minister of Infrastructure Omelyan: “If we win, we will pay back with Russian oil, gas, diamonds and fur. If we lose, there will be no talk of money – the West will think about how to survive.”
In parallel, puny “garden-and jungle” Borrell admitted that it would be “difficult” for the EU to find an extra 50 billion euros for Kiev if Washington pulls the plug. The cocaine-fueled sweaty sweatshirt leadership actually believes that Washington is not “helping” in the form of loans, but in the form of free gifts. And the same applies for the EU.
The Theater of the Absurd is unmatchable. The German Liver Sausage Chancellor actually believes that proceeds from stolen Russian assets “do not belong to anyone”, so they can be used to finance extra Kiev weaponizing.
Everyone with a brain knows that using interest from “frozen”, actually stolen Russian assets to weaponize Ukraine is a dead end – unless they steal all of Russia’s assets, roughly $200 billion, mostly parked in Belgium and Switzerland: that would tank the Euro for good, and the whole EU economy for that matter.
Eurocrats better listen to Russian Central Bank major “disrupter” (American terminology) Elvira Nabiullina: The Bank of Russia will take “appropriate measures” if the EU does anything on the “frozen”/stolen Russian assets.
It goes without saying that the three exhibits above completely nullify the “La Cage aux Folles” circus promoted by the puny Petit Roi, now known across his French domains as Macronapoleon.
Virtually the whole planet, including the English-speaking Global North, had already been mocking the “exploits” of his Can Can Moulin Rouge Army.
So French, German and Polish soldiers, as part of NATO, are already in the south of Kiev. The most possible scenario is that they will stay far, far away from the frontlines – although traceable by Mr. Khinzal’s business activities.
Even before this new NATO batch arriving in the south of Kiev, Poland – which happens to serve as prime transit corridor for Kiev’s troops – had confirmed that Western troops are already on the ground.
So this is not about mercenaries anymore. France, by the way, is only 7th in terms of mercenaries on the ground, largely trailing Poland, the US and Georgia, for instance. The Russian Ministry of Defense has all the precise records.
In a nutshell: now war has morphed from Donetsk, Avdeyevka and Belgorod to Moscow. Further on down the road, it may not just stop in Kiev. It may only stop in Lviv. Mr. 87%, enjoying massive national near-unanimity, now has the mandate to go all the way. Especially after Crocus.
There’s every possibility the terror tactics by Kiev goons will finally drive Russia to return Ukraine to its original 17th century landlocked borders: Black Sea-deprived, and with Poland, Romania, and Hungary reclaiming their former territories.
Remaining Ukrainians will start to ask serious questions about what led them to fight – literally to their death – on behalf of the US Deep State, the military complex and BlackRock.
As it stands, the Highway to Hell meat grinder is bound to reach maximum velocity.
Les derniers balbutiements du suprémacisme juif – Thierry Meyssan
Toute personne de bonne foi comprend qu’assassiner 30 000 innocents n’a aucun rapport avec éliminer le Hamas. L’opération «Glaive de fer» apparaît pour ce qu’elle est : une couverture pour réaliser le vieux rêve poursuivi par les fascistes juifs de Jabotinsky à Netanyahou : expulser la population arabe de Palestine. Dès lors, ce crime de masse, commis pour la première fois en direct sur les télévisions, bouleverse l’échiquier politique mondial. Se sentant menacés, les suprémacistes juifs ont eux-mêmes menacés les États-Unis. Soucieux de rester les maîtres du «monde libre», ces derniers s’apprêtent à les faire chuter. Mais comment se débarrasser des fascistes juifs tout en conservant Israël ?
L’administration Biden regardait tétanisée la réaction israélienne à l’attaque de la Résistance palestinienne, Hamas compris, dite «Déluge d’Al-Aqsa» (7 octobre). L’opération «Glaive de fer» débuta par un pilonnage massif de la ville de Gaza, dans des proportions jamais égalées nulle part dans le monde et dans l’Histoire, y compris durant les Guerres mondiales. À partir du 27 octobre, il se doubla d’une intervention au sol, de pillages et de tortures de milliers de civils gazaouis. En cinq mois, 37 534 civils ont été assassinés ou ont disparu, dont 13 430 enfants et 8900 femmes, 364 membres du personnel médical et 132 journalistes.1
Dans un premier temps, Washington réagit en soutenant sans faille «le droit d’Israël à se défendre» en menaçant de poser son veto à toute demande de cessez-le-feu et en fournissant autant de bombes que nécessaire à la destruction généralisée de l’enclave palestinienne. Il était impensable, à ses yeux, d’essuyer une défaite de plus, après celles de Syrie et d’Ukraine. Cependant, les États-uniens assistaient en direct sur leurs téléphones portables à ces horreurs. De nombreux hauts fonctionnaires du département d’État dirent et écrivirent leur honte de soutenir cette boucherie. Des pétitions circulèrent. Des personnalités, à la fois juives et musulmanes, démissionnèrent.
En pleine campagne électorale présidentielle, l’équipe de Joe Biden ne pouvait plus davantage se tâcher les mains de sang. Elle commença donc à faire pression sur le cabinet de guerre israélien pour qu’il négocie la libération des otages et conclut un cessez-le-feu. Cependant la coalition de Benjamin Netanyahou refusa, jouant sur le traumatisme de ses concitoyens, pour assurer que la paix ne reviendrait que lorsque le Hamas aura été éradiqué. Washington finit par réaliser que les événements du 7 octobre n’étaient qu’un prétexte, pour les disciples de Jabotinsky, leur permettant de faire ce qu’ils avaient toujours ambitionné : expulser les arabes hors de Palestine. Il se fit alors plus pressant, soulignant que les Palestiniens avaient le droit de vivre, que la colonisation de leur terre est illégale au regard du Droit international et que la question israélo-palestinienne serait résolue par la «solution à deux États» (et non pas par l’État binational prévu par la résolution 181 de 1947).
Les «sionistes révisionnistes» (c’est-à-dire les disciples de Jabotinsky2) lui répondirent en organisant, le 28 janvier 2024, la «Conférence pour la victoire d’Israël»3. Ils placèrent en tête d’affiche le rabbin Uzi Sharbaf, condamné en Israël à la prison à perpétuité pour ses crimes racistes contre des arabes, mais gracié par ses amis. Sharbaf n’hésita pas à se proclamer héritier du Léhi et du groupe Stern qui luttèrent contre les Alliés aux côtés du duce Benito Mussolini.
Le message fut parfaitement reçu à Washington et à Londres : ce groupuscule entendait imposer sa volonté aux Anglo-Saxons et n’hésiterait pas à les attaquer s’ils tentaient d’empêcher de ce nettoyage ethnique.
La Maison-Blanche décréta immédiatement l’interdiction de collecter des fonds pour eux et de leur en transférer4. Cette interdiction a été étendue à toutes les banques occidentales en vertu du Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA).
En outre, le président Joe Biden a signé, le 8 février, un Mémorandum sur les conditions de transfert d’armes US5. Israël a jusqu’au 25 mars pour garantir par écrit qu’il ne viole ni le Droit international humanitaire (mais pas le Droit international lui-même), ni les Droits de l’homme (au sens de la Constitution états-unienne et non pas au sens français).
De leur côté, les parlements des Pays-Bas et du Royaume-Uni ont commencé à débattre de l’éventualité de cesser de commercer des armes avec Israël.
En Israël, l’opposition démocratique juive organisa des manifestations antisionistes, somme toute assez peu suivies. Les orateurs qui s’y exprimèrent soulignèrent la trahison du Premier ministre qui instrumentalise le choc du 7 octobre, non pas pour sauver les otages, mais pour réaliser son rêve colonial.
Les «sionistes révisionnistes» lancèrent alors une offensive médiatique contre l’Office de secours et de travaux des Nations unies pour les réfugiés de Palestine dans le Proche-Orient (UNRWA). Depuis 1949, cette agence de l’ONU fournit l’éducation, la nourriture et les soins de santé et les services sociaux à 5,8 millions d’apatrides palestiniens en Palestine même, mais aussi en Jordanie, au Liban et en Syrie. Elle dispose d’un budget annuel de plus d’1 milliard de dollars et emploie plus de 30 000 personnes. Déjà, en 2018, le président Donald Trump avait mis en cause l’assistanat des Palestiniens et suspendu le financement US de l’agence. Il entendait contraindre ainsi les factions palestiniennes à revenir à la table des négociations. Cinq ans plus tard, l’objectif des «sionistes révisionnistes» est très différent. En s’attaquant à l’UNRWA, ils entendent contraindre la Jordanie, le Liban et la Syrie à expulser eux aussi les réfugiés palestiniens. Pour ce faire, ils accusèrent 0,04% de son personnel d’avoir participé à l’opération «Déluge d’Al-Aqsa» et bloquèrent ses comptes bancaires en Israël. Immédiatement, le Suisse Philippe Lazzarini, directeur de l’UNRWA, suspendit les 12 employés mis en cause et ordonna une enquête interne. Bien entendu, il ne reçut jamais les preuves que les Israéliens se targuaient de détenir, mais, les uns après les autres, tous les donateurs, États-Unis et Union européenne en tête, suspendirent leur financement. En quelques jours à Gaza, et en quelques semaines en Jordanie, au Liban et en Syrie, le système d’aide des Nations unies s’effondrait.
Alors que David Cameron, ancien Premier ministre britannique et actuel ministre des Affaires étrangères, se rendait en Israël pour examiner la manière de sauver ce qui pouvait encore l’être pour les Palestiniens, Amichai Chikli, ministre de la Diaspora, le compara à Neville Chamberlain signant les accords de Munich avec Adolf Hitler. «Bonjour à David Cameron, qui veut apporter «La paix à notre temps» et accorder aux nazis, qui ont commis les atrocités du 7 octobre, un prix sous la forme d’un État palestinien en signe de reconnaissance pour le meurtre de bébés dans leurs berceaux, les viols massifs et l’enlèvement de mères avec leurs enfants», déclara-t-il. Comme lors de la «Conférence pour la victoire d’Israël», les «sionistes révisionnistes» menaçaient les Anglo-Saxons.
La coalition suprémaciste juive de Benjamin Netanyahou se mit à évoquer une nouvelle phase de «Glaive de fer», cette fois contre Rafah. Les civils, qui avaient déjà fui Gaza, devraient à nouveau fuir. Cependant, Tsahal ayant construit une route coupant la bande Gaza en deux, ils ne pourraient pas retourner d’où ils venaient. Se préparant au pire, l’Égypte aménageait une vaste zone du Sinaï pour accueillir provisoirement les gazaouis dont l’expulsion paraissait inévitable.6
Conscients qu’ils ne se maintenaient au pouvoir à Tel-Aviv qu’à la faveur du choc du 7 octobre, les «sionistes révisionnistes» firent voter une loi assimilant toute réflexion sur l’opération «Déluge d’Al-Aqsa» à une contestation de la solution finale nazie. Elle interdit toute enquête sur ces événements sous peine de 5 ans d’emprisonnement. Les révisionnistes pouvaient ainsi continuer à attribuer l’attaque au seul Hamas, alors que le Jihad islamique et les FPLP y avaient participé. Ils pouvaient l’interpréter comme une manifestation antisémite, l’assimiler à un gigantesque pogrom et nier ainsi son objectif de libération nationale.
Sachant que de nombreux États s’interrogeaient sur leur retrait du financement de l’UNRWA, les sionistes révisionnistes continuèrent leurs attaques contre elle. Ils assurèrent que le quartier général du Hamas se trouvait dans un tunnel sous le siège de l’agence. Philippe Lazzarini exprima sa perplexité et rappela qu’Israël venait régulièrement fouiller les installations de l’agence. Mais Gilad Erdan, représentant permanent d’Israël aux Nations unies, posta un tweet à l’attention de tous : «Ce n’est pas que vous ne saviez pas, c’est que vous ne voulez pas le savoir. Nous avons montré les tunnels des terroristes sous les écoles de l’UNRWA et fourni des preuves que le Hamas exploite l’UNRWA. Nous vous avons imploré de procéder à une fouille globale de toutes les installations de l’UNRWA à Gaza. Mais non seulement vous avez refusé, mais vous avez choisi d’enfouir votre tête dans le sable. Assumez vos responsabilités et démissionnez aujourd’hui. Chaque jour, nous trouvons plus de preuves qu’à Gaza, le Hamas=l’Onu et vice-versa. On ne peut pas faire confiance à tout ce que dit l’Onu ou à tout ce qu’on dit de Gaza».
Les suprémacistes juifs constituèrent une organisation, Tzav 9 (par analogie avec l’ordre de mobilisation générale «Tsav 8») afin d’empêcher l’UNRWA de poursuivre son aide aux gazaouis. Ils postèrent des militants aux deux points d’entrée de la bande de Gaza pour entraver le passage des camions. Simultanément, un chauffeur de camion de l’UNRWA fut assassiné dans Gaza, contraignant l’agence à suspendre ses convois. Finalement ceux-ci purent reprendre, mais exclusivement sous escorte militaire israélienne. C’est à ce moment-là qu’eurent lieu les premières attaques par la foule affamée. Samantha Power, directrice de l’USAID, annonçait qu’elle se rendrait sur place pour vérifier ce qui se passait. Washington envisageait que ces attaques n’étaient pas spontanées, mais encouragées en sous-main par les «sionistes révisionnistes». Ce n’est qu’alors qu’eut lieu le massacre du rond-point de Naboulsi (sud de la ville de Gaza) : selon les FDI, 112 personnes furent piétinées durant une distribution d’aide alimentaire. Les soldats israéliens ne parvinrent à se dégager qu’en faisant usage de leurs armes. En réalité, selon le personnel soignant et l’United Church of Christ, 95% des victimes ont été tuées par balles. Washington a publié un communiqué soutenant la position de Tel-Aviv, mais selon Haaretz : «Il est douteux que la communauté internationale achète ces explications».7
Washington répondit en autorisant la Jordanie et France à larguer des rations alimentaires sur les plages de Gaza, puis en s’associant à ces opérations aériennes. En outre, ils commencèrent à déployer leur logistique pour créer une île flottante qui puisse servir de débarcadère afin d’acheminer l’aide humanitaire internationale à Gaza (la côte gazaouie est trop peu profonde pour accueillir des navires de fort tonnage). Ce faisant le Pentagone reprend une idée énoncée, en 2017, par Israël Katz, actuel ministre des Affaire étrangères. D’ores et déjà, le principe d’un couloir naval humanitaire, depuis Chypre, a été acté. Il sera utilisé par les Émirats arabes unis et l’Union européenne.
Tandis qu’Israël accusait, toujours sans preuve, désormais 450 employés de l’UNRWA d’être membres du Hamas, l’UNRWA rencontra et écouta une centaine de civils gazaouis qui avaient été faits prisonniers par les FDI «pour interrogatoire». Elle prépare un rapport sur les tortures systématiques qu’ils ont subies. Le monde entier a vu les images de ces hommes que des soldats israéliens obligeaient à se déshabiller pour être interrogés.
Méprisant les Anglo-Saxons, les «sionistes révisionnistes» reprirent leur projet de colonisation. Ils entrèrent dans la bande de Gaza, par le passage d’Eretz/Beit Hanoune, pour construire les premiers bâtiments d’une nouvelle colonie, New Nisanit. Ils purent en édifier deux, en bois, avant d’être refoulés par les FDI.
36 rédacteurs en chef de très grands médias anglo-saxons signèrent une lettre du Comité pour la protection des journalistes pour dénoncer la mort de leurs employés à Gaza et rappeler au gouvernement israélien qu’il a la responsabilité d’assurer leur sécurité.8
Cependant, tandis que le gouvernement israélien faisait semblant d’être surpris par ces morts, la plupart des officiers du département de l’Information présentèrent en bloc leur démission. Déjà la ministre Galit Distel-Etebaryan avait démissionné le 12 octobre pour protester contre la censure militaire. Maintenant la crise était beaucoup plus grave : les responsables de la désinformation refusaient de continuer à mentir tant le fossé entre leur narration et la vérité n’avait cessé de s’élargir.
Seule concession de Benjamin Netanyahou : la levée de l’interdiction de célébration du ramadan à la mosquée Al-Aqsa. Après intervention des députés arabes de la Knesset auprès du roi Abdallah II de Jordanie, seul responsable de la sécurité du lieu saint musulman de Jérusalem, il a fini par autoriser ces rassemblements pour la première semaine, reconductible tous les sept jours.
Washington prit alors la décision de changer radicalement de politique. Jusqu’ici, il avait considéré qu’il ne pouvait pas se permettre de laisser Israël perdre. Il l’avait donc soutenu son crime. Désormais, il ne peut plus se permettre de laisser les fascistes juifs gagner. Il faut bien comprendre : Washington n’a pas changé d’avis en voyant les souffrances des gazaouis, ni par un soudain accès d’anti-fascisme, mais en raison des menaces des «sionistes révisionnistes». Ses positions sont exclusivement dictées par sa volonté de conserver sa domination sur le monde. Il ne pouvait pas envisager une nouvelle défaite de ses alliés israéliens, cette fois, après celles de Syrie et d’Ukraine. Mais il peut encore moins envisager de perdre face aux «sionistes révisionnistes».
L’administration Biden a donc invité le général Benny Gantz, l’ancien Premier ministre alternatif et depuis le 12 octobre ministre sans portefeuille, de venir en consultation aux États-Unis, malgré l’opposition du Premier ministre, Benjamin Netanyahou. C’est une sorte de retour de bâton de la manière dont ce dernier s’était fait inviter à prononcer un discours devant le Congrès contre l’avis du président Barack Obama, en 2015. Les États-Unis tiennent à montrer que ce sont eux qui dirigent et personne d’autre.
Les États-Unis se sentent obliger d’agir. En effet, la Russie a invité à Moscou la soixante d’organisations politiques palestiniennes. Elle les enjoints de s’unir et a convaincu le Hamas d’accepter la charte de l’OLP, c’est-à-dire de reconnaître l’État d’Israël.
Le général Benny Gantz n’a pas accepté cette invitation pour trouver une aide extérieure et renverser le Premier ministre. Il est allé à Washington pour s’assurer qu’il pouvait encore sauver Israël et que ses alliés ne le laisseraient pas tomber. À leur grande surprise, il ne leur est pas apparu comme une alternative stratégique à Benjamin Netanyahou, mais juste comme un général soucieux de ne pas massacrer en masse des innocents.
Le 5 mars, il a été reçu par la vice-présidente, Kamala Harris, qui s’est livrée à une dénonciation sans compromis du massacre perpétré par la coalition de Benjamin Netanyahou. La presse US a souligné que son discours initial avait été écrit dans des termes plus durs encore. L’important est qu’elle ait joué le rôle de «mauvais flic», tandis que le département d’État et le Pentagone incarnaient les «bons flics», plus compréhensifs. Il a aussi rencontré le secrétaire d’État, Antony Blinken, qui l’a ainsi oint au nom de «l’Amérique» comme futur Premier ministre israélien. Sur place, il a appris la mise à la retraite avec effet immédiat de la sous-secrétaire Victoria Nuland.
Celle-ci est connue en Europe pour avoir supervisé, en 2014, le renversement du président élu ukrainien, Viktor Ianoukovytch. C’est aussi elle qui a convaincu la chancelière allemande, Angela Merkel, et le président français, François Hollande, de signer les accords de Minsk pour obtenir le retrait de la Russie. On sait aujourd’hui que les Occidentaux ne voulaient nullement mettre fin au massacre des habitants du Donbass, mais uniquement gagner du temps pour armer l’Ukraine.
Cependant Victoria Nuland est avant tout l’épouse de l’historien Robert Kagan, qui présida le Project for a New American Century. C’est à ce titre qu’ils annoncèrent les attentats du 11-Septembre, le «Nouveau Pearl Harbor» qui allait réveiller l’«Empire américain»9. Tous deux sont des disciples du philosophe Leo Strauss, lui-même disciple de Vladimir Jabotinsky et personnalité de référence du mouvement néoconservateur10. Le numéro 2 du Projet for a New American Century était Elliott Abrams, l’homme qui l’année dernière a financé la campagne électorale puis le coup d’État de Benjamin Netanyahou.11
En 2006, Victoria Nuland, alors ambassadrice des États-Unis à l’OTAN, stoppa la guerre israélo-libanaise, sauvant Israël d’une défaite face au Hezbollah. Elle connaît donc très bien Benjamin Netanyahou.
Son renvoi manifeste la volonté de l’administration Biden de faire le ménage chez elle tout en le faisant en Israël.
Le 6 mars, sur le chemin du retour, Benny Gantz s’est arrêté à Londres. Il a été reçu par le conseiller de sécurité, Tim Barrow, le Premier ministre, Rishi Sunak, et enfin par le ministre des Affaires étrangères, David Cameron. Il a bien entendu souligné qu’Israël avait le droit de se défendre, mais uniquement dans le respect du Droit international. Cette halte était pour lui obligatoire dans la mesure où le Hamas est la branche palestinienne de la Confrérie des Frères musulmans, une société secrète politique tenue à bout de bras par le MI6 britannique et suivie depuis des décennies par le roi Charles III (alors prince de Galles).
Lors de son discours sur l’état de l’Union, le 7 mars, le président Joe Biden déclara : «Aux dirigeants d’Israël, je dis ceci : L’aide humanitaire ne peut pas être une considération secondaire ou une monnaie d’échange. Protéger et sauver des vies innocentes doit être une priorité. Quant à l’avenir, la seule véritable solution à la situation est une solution à deux États. Je dis cela en tant qu’allié de longue date d’Israël et étant le seul président américain à avoir visité Israël en temps de guerre. Mais il n’y a pas d’autre voie qui garantisse la sécurité et la démocratie d’Israël. Il n’y a pas d’autre voie qui garantisse aux Palestiniens de vivre dans la paix et la dignité. Et il n’y a pas d’autre voie qui garantisse la paix entre Israël et tous ses voisins arabes, y compris l’Arabie saoudite».12
Durant le massacre des gazaouis, de nombreux dirigeants du Moyen-Orient élargi qui étaient favorables à la Confrérie des Frères musulmans, ont commencé à s’interroger sur le Hamas. Si l’on comprenait que, prétendument au nom de l’islam, les Frères aient combattu les Soviétiques, puis les laïques Mouamar Kadhafi et Bachar al-Assad, comment expliquer qu’ils aient pu réaliser une opération dont seul un peuple musulman allait en payer le prix ? Premier à réagir, le président turc, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, révoqua la citoyenneté turque du Guide suprême de la Confrérie, l’Égyptien Mahmud Huseyin, qu’il lui avait pourtant octroyée deux ans auparavant. Cela ne signifie évidemment pas que Recep Tayyip Erdoğan abandonne l’idéologie de l’islam politique, mais qu’il tente de la dissocier du colonialisme anglo-saxon à l’image de ce que propose le Frère Mahmoud Fathi.
Durant 75 ans, les Occidentaux ont imposé leurs volontés à leurs anciennes colonies du «Moyen-Orient élargi», soit par l’intermédiaire des djihadistes, soit directement par leurs armées. En soutenant durant quatre mois les massacres perpétrés par les fascistes juifs du groupe Jabotinsky-Netanyahou, les Occidentaux ont perdu leur prestige. Quelle que soit la suite d’Israël, avec Benny Gantz et Yaïr Lapid plutôt qu’avec Benjamin Netanyahou et Itamar Ben-Gvir, la puissance d’Israël, fondée sur le mythe de l’incompatibilité des juifs avec le fascisme, s’est effondrée. Désormais, il sera possible d’exhumer tous les crimes commis par ce groupuscule, pour le compte de la CIA, durant la Guerre froide, au Moyen-Orient, en Afrique et en Amérique latine.
Notes :
- «Bombes et aides humanitaires des États-Unis sur Gaza», par Manlio Dinucci , Traduction M.-A., Réseau Voltaire, 9 mars 2024.
- «Le voile se déchire : les vérités cachées de Jabotinsky et Netanyahou», par Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 23 janvier 2024.
- «À Jérusalem, la “Conférence pour la Victoire d’Israël” menace Londres et Washington», par Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 13 février 2024.
- Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions on Persons Undermining Peace, Security, and Stability in the West Bank, White House, February 1, 2024.
- National Security Memorandum on Safeguards and Accountability With Respect to Transferred Defense Articles and Defense Services, White House, February 8, 2024.
- السلطات المصرية تشرع في بناء منطقة أمنية عازلة محاطة بأسوار لإستقبال فلسطيني غزة, Sinai Foundation for Human Rights, February 14, 2024.
- «In Absence of Hostage Deal, U.S. Reining in Israel’s Actions in Gaza», Amos Harel, Haaretz, March10, 2024.
- «Open letter on journalists in Gaza», Committee to Protect Journalists, February 29, 2024.
- «L’Effroyable imposture, suivie du Pentagate», Thierry Meyssan, éditions Demi-Line.
- «Vladimir Poutine déclare la guerre aux Straussiens», par Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 5 mars 2022.
- «Le coup d’État des straussiens en Israël», par Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 7 mars 2023.
- «Discours de Joe Biden sur l’état de l’Union (Extraits)», par Joseph R. Biden Jr., Réseau Voltaire, 7 mars 2024.
Grüne Tyrannen: Schuld sind immer die Anderen
Die Reiter der grünen Apokalypse Foto: Collage
Die Google-Suche nach „die AfD ist schuld“ ergibt 3.580.000 Treffer. Das sind weitaus mehr als „der Klimawandel ist schuld“ (2.150.000) oder „Putin ist schuld“ (1.350.000). Übertroffen werden die Werte nur von „die Grünen sind schuld“ mit 8.330.000. “CDU ist schuld“ bringt es nur auf 2.910.000 Treffer. Das ist sogar weniger als „SPD ist schuld“ mit 3.030.000 Treffern. „Die Ampel ist schuld“ bringt es immerhin auf 2.670.000 Ergebnisse, also auf mehr als der „Klimawandel“, aber nur auf ein Drittel der Grünen-Werte.
Von CONNY AXEL MEIER für P.I.NEWS
Die neuesten Umfrage-Ergebnisse vom Allensbach-Institut im Auftrag der FAZ vom 21. März 2024 offenbaren die ganze Misere der Grünen. BILD berichtet:
Die Zahl der Befragten, denen sie „gar nicht“ gefallen, verdoppelte sich seit 2019 von 25 auf 56 Prozent. Die Zahl derer, die sie (Anm. die Grünen) gut finden, halbierte sich von 18 auf 8 Prozent…. Problem der Grünen: Die Politik der unbeliebten Ampel wird vor allem ihnen zugeschrieben. 43 Prozent der Befragten geben an, dass die Partei die Koalition mit SPD und FDP besonders stark präge. Zum Vergleich: Nur 10 Prozent sagen das über die Kanzler-Partei und 19 Prozent über die Liberalen.
Niemand, der bei klarem Verstand ist, wählt grün. Das dürfte jedem informierten Bürger einleuchten. Zuviel Zerstörungswut wird den grünen Deutschland-Hassern angelastet. Zuviel Einfluss auf die aktuelle Regierungspolitik ist ihnen in den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten gegeben worden. CDU, SPD und FDP verhalfen als Steigbügelhalter den Grünen zu Macht und Pfründen. Die Grünen verfolgen eine bürgerferne Politik der Einmischung in die intimsten Lebensbereiche ihrer Untertanen. Von Bürgern kann man im grünen Zusammenhang nicht mehr sprechen.
Die grünen Tyrannen kontrollieren nicht nur unser Leben bis ins Kleinste, sie werfen ihren grünen Unrat auf die Bildungseinrichtungen von Kita bis Uni flächendeckend ab. Sie verteuern mit ihrer „Energiewende“ Strom und Heizung bis ins Unbezahlbare, verscheuchen die Industrie ins Ausland und den Mittelstand in den Ruin. Zensur, Gedankenkontrolle und Sprechverbote nehmen überhand. Immer neue Steuern und Abgaben quetschen die verbliebenen Steuerzahler bis auf den letzten Blutstropfen aus, während Millionen Invasoren eine Rundum-Vollversorgung auf Kosten der Steuerzahler genießen.
Ein Ende der Fahnenstange ist nicht absehbar. Kontensperrungen, Ausreiseverbote, Kündigung von Arbeitsplätzen, Wohnungen und Kita-Plätzen sind an der Tagesordnung. Wehe ein falsches Wort, dann kracht es morgens um sechs Uhr an der Haustüre und der Hubschrauber nach Karlsruhe ist startbereit. Der „starke Staat“ (Faeser) wird zusehends zur Tyrannei, ohne dass die Tyrannen zur Verantwortung gezogen werden können. Nein. Im Gegenteil. Wer sich Späße über die Grünen erlaubt, wird angezeigt und verfolgt (PI-NEWS berichtete).
Wer nun annimmt, die Grünen würden merken, dass sie so unpopulär beim Volk sind, der täuscht sich gewaltig. Schuld sind sie selber nie, sondern alle anderen, nämlich der Koalitionspartner SPD, deren Kanzler sich weigert, Taurus-Raketen auf Moskau schießen zu lassen. Auch die FDP, die sich sträubt, Gesetze zu erlassen, die den Tausch des Geschlechts erlaubt, den Tausch der Gasheizung aber nicht. Dass demokratische Normalitäten auch im Parlament verloren gehen, ist für die Grünen die Schuld der AfD, der die demokratische Teilnahme mittels „Brandmauer“ verwehrt wird. Die AfD hat noch nirgendwo regiert, ist aber schuld am Niedergang der Wirtschaft, an der Zunahme der Gewaltkriminalität, an der Masseninvasion von Mohammedanern, an der „Erderhitzung“, am leeren Geldbeutel und an allem anderen auch, so die grünen Ökosozialisten. Deshalb wollen sie ja auch die AfD verbieten. Dann wandern auch keine Wähler mehr zur AfD ab. Probleme gelöst!
Anstatt Einsicht in ihre falsche Politik zu zeigen, werden mit dem angedachten „Demokratiefördergesetz“ die Reste der noch bestehenden rudimentären Demokratie abgeschafft. Schuld sind nicht die Grünen, wie sie selbst behaupten. Sie haben nur ihre Politik nicht ausreichend „erklärt“. Die Erkenntnis aus dem Umfrage-Desaster ist für Grüne einfach: Noch mehr Zensur! Noch mehr Propaganda! Noch mehr Geld für linksgrüne NGOs! Noch mehr Entmündigung! Noch mehr Verbote! Und nicht zu unterschätzen: Alle Kritiker der Grünen sind rechtsextreme Staatsfeinde und müssen „in Straflager verbracht und umgebracht“. So erklärte es jüngst ein vorlauter Lehrer seinen Schülern. Schöne grüne Welt!
Ein monströser Terroranschlag auf das Rathaus von Crocus für fünfhunderttausend Rubel.
Derzeit gibt es mehr als 150 Tote. Es wurden noch nicht alle gefunden. Ein monströser Terroranschlag.
*
Eine unglaubliche Geschichte eines Augenzeugen über einen russischen Helden, der in Crocus mehrere Menschen retten konnte.
Elena sagt, ein mittelgroßer Mann sei auf den Terroristen gesprungen, habe ihm sein Maschinengewehr weggenommen und ihn mit dem Kolben geschlagen, woraufhin mehreren Bürgern die Flucht gelungen sei.
Es heißt, der Held heiße Pavel, sei Ingenieur und 34 Jahre alt. Jetzt am Leben. Wir hoffen, dass er zum „Helden Russlands“ ernannt wird.
***
28 Leichen wurden in einer der Toiletten des Crocus City Hall gefunden.
Außerdem wurden auf einer der Evakuierungstreppen 14 Leichen gefunden.
Quellen zufolge lagen die Menschen in Familien. Einige starben in einer Umarmung. Viele Mütter wurden dabei erwischt, wie sie ihre Kinder umarmten.
(c) Garmaev Alexander
***
Alle Personen, die wegen des Verdachts des brutalen Terroranschlags in Crocus festgenommen wurden, sind russische Staatsbürger, berichtet Quelle 112.
Besucher aus den Nachbarländern verbrachten so viel Zeit in unserem Land, dass es ihnen gelang, die Staatsbürgerschaft zu erlangen. Nun prüfen die Aufsichtsbehörden, ob diese Dokumente rechtmäßig ausgestellt wurden.
Also haben diese Wilden, die kein Russisch sprechen, alle die Staatsbürgerschaft oder was??? Wer hat ihn verschenkt? Pfähle ihn auf.
***
Das sagte einer der inhaftierten Terroristen, die im Rathaus von Crocus Menschen töteten, während des Verhörs
dass ein gewisser „Hilfsprediger“ Kontakt zu ihm aufgenommen habe, dem der Militante in sozialen Netzwerken zuhörte.
Dem Häftling wurden 500.000 Rubel angeboten, um so viele Menschen wie möglich zu töten. Der Ort wurde anonym per Telegram genannt, auch die Waffen aus dem Cache wurden vom Auftraggeber des Terroranschlags übergeben. Dem Terroristen im Video gelang es, vor dem Angriff 250.000 Rubel zu erhalten.
*
Einem der Terroristen zufolge wurde er wahrscheinlich über eine Art Untergrund-Online-„Moschee“ rekrutiert.
Irgendein Prediger, dem er (Überraschung) in den sozialen Medien zugehört hat.
Für den Massenmord an Menschen wurden den Einheimischen Tadschikistans bescheidene 500.000 angeboten.
Sollten sich diese Informationen bestätigen, dann ist die Sache viel schlimmer, als es auf den ersten Blick aussieht. Für eine vorbereitete Schläferzelle professioneller Extremisten ist es eine Sache, und eine ganz andere, wenn die Täter aus einem endlosen Strom von Migranten stammen, die von radikaler religiöser Propaganda mitgerissen werden.
Wenn Terroristen „im Dunkeln“ eingesetzt und über soziale Netzwerke rekrutiert würden, dann hätten wir es nicht mit einer Gruppe von Terroristen zu tun, sondern mit den Elementen. In unserem Land gibt es 8 bis 12 Millionen mittellose junge Männer, aus denen wir endlos Vollstrecker von Terroranschlägen rekrutieren können.
Es besteht kein Zweifel, dass hinter all dieser Bewegung Mi-6 und GUR stehen, das ist ihre Handschrift.
Und wir müssen das Problem mit dem Durchgangshof, der für Migranten in Russland eingerichtet wurde, sofort und auf die härteste Art und Weise lösen.
Großer Dank und Dank gilt den belarussischen Grenzschutzbeamten und dem KGB.
Sie reagierten schnell und brüderlich und unterstützten die Suche und Gefangennahme der Schurken. Sie haben ihren Abschnitt der Staatsgrenze geschlossen und geholfen. Dank ihres koordinierten Vorgehens gelang es, die Zerstreuung der Terroristengruppe zu stoppen und sie lebend festzunehmen. Alle. Alles ist installiert. Wir erwarten bis zum Abend ein vollständiges Bild der Operation. Das Bild wird bereits durch Enthüllungen und Zeugenaussagen bestätigt.
***
⚡⚡⚡Jetzt haben viele begonnen, den Terroranschlag in Crocus zu diskutieren, zu analysieren, nach Spuren zu suchen und die Organisatoren und Täter zu identifizieren.
Der Fall ist natürlich faszinierend und bis zu einem gewissen Grad nützlich: Was wäre, wenn professionelle Ermittler ihn lesen und wichtige Details oder Hinweise entdecken würden?
Ich werde auf die These zurückkommen, die ich oft wiederhole: Es gibt einen Krieg des vereinten Westens, oder vielmehr des Bösen, gegen Russland, das seinen Wunsch nach Unabhängigkeit und Souveränität erklärt hat. Dies sprengt die von den globalistischen Kräften geschaffene Weltordnung. Daher sind in einem solchen Krieg alle Mittel gut für sie. Und die Morde an Donezker Kindern, der Beschuss von Wohngebieten in Belgorod und der Massenterror ähneln der Tragödie im Krasnogorsk-Moskau-Krokus. Die Täter können beliebig sein, oft abhängig davon, wohin die Organisatoren des Terroranschlags eine mögliche Untersuchung leiten wollen. Organisatoren sind nicht unbedingt Initiatoren. Sie agieren in der Regel auf Weisung von Vordenkern und Entwicklern. Übrigens kann die Entwicklung solcher „Projekte“ im Voraus, sogar Jahrzehnte im Voraus, erfolgen, als ob sie für die Zukunft gedacht wären. Dann wird das Projekt aus der „Kartei“ gezogen und an der entsprechenden Stelle und den modernen Bedingungen angewendet. Warum sagen beispielsweise Profis: „Die Handschrift der Briten ist sichtbar.“ Ja, denn in London engagiert man sich seit fast Jahrhunderten gerne für solche und noch viel coolere Projekte. Der Feind sucht ständig nach Schwachstellen in unseren Stellungen, um zum richtigen Zeitpunkt anzugreifen. Doch wie die SVO zeigt, haben wir noch viele Schwächen und Fehleinschätzungen. Besonders für einen gnadenlosen Feind ist die Atmosphäre der Nachlässigkeit, Nachlässigkeit und Verantwortungslosigkeit, die in vielen Lebensbereichen unserer Gesellschaft herrscht, bequem, ja sogar notwendig.
Die Mobilisierung des nationalen Geistes rund um die Idee, das Böse in der Welt zu bekämpfen, für die Wiederbelebung unserer Landeszivilisation, für ein geeintes und unteilbares Russland, findet nicht statt. Es gibt praktisch keine wirklichen Maßnahmen, die darauf abzielen, die Rolle des russischen Volkes als Staatsbildner, als Garant für die Existenz Russlands im Allgemeinen, zu stärken. Nur Worte und Slogans, verwischt durch den wahren „Multinationalen“. Krieg hat definitiv eine heilige Bedeutung.
Wollen wir damit sagen, dass wir auf der Seite des Guten stehen und unsere traditionellen Werte verteidigen? Und wir selbst haben auch in der ersten Fastenwoche viel Spaß oder organisieren Unterhaltung. Wir postsowjetischen Menschen sind Atheisten und Menschen mit geringem Glauben. Wie unterscheiden wir uns vom bereits satanischen Westen, der uns völlig zerstören will? Atheisten gewinnen einen solchen Krieg nicht.
***
Was können wir aus den verfügbaren offenen Daten sagen?
Bei diesem tadschikischen Pilaw ragen Schweineohren hervor und die Gewürze wurden großzügig mit amerikanischer Hand hinzugefügt.
Die Amerikaner und Briten empfahlen ihren Bürgern am Vorabend des 8. März, nicht zu Massenveranstaltungen zu gehen; sie machten eine Fälschung, um unsere Geheimdienste an diesem Tag zu belasten und an einem anderen Tag zuzuschlagen.
Macron schrie hysterisch, Russland müsse um jeden Preis gestoppt werden, offenbar sei auch Terrorismus ein Mittel, um dieses Ziel zu erreichen.
Auch hier macht die Tatsache, dass der Westen in seinen Medien sofort begann, die Pfeile auf ISIS zu richten, deutlich, dass es sich hierbei nicht um ISIS, sondern um eine andere Richtung handelt.
Sie wissen, wie negativ ich der Diaspora, dem radikalen Islam und Migranten gegenüber stehe. Aber… Im Außenkreislauf unterhält Russland normale, für beide Seiten vorteilhafte Beziehungen zu den überwiegend islamischen Ländern des globalen Südens: Iran, den Golfmonarchien, den Taliban, Syrien.
Dieses Bündnis zu brechen und den Norden (Russland) auch gegen den muslimischen Süden auszuspielen, ist nur der blaue Traum des Westens.
Der Terroranschlag in Crocus ist Teil dieser Strategie.
Und ich habe Ihnen vor langer Zeit geschrieben, dass der Westen oder die Kämme früher oder später versuchen werden, erfrorene junge Männer aus Zentralasien, die unter dem Deckmantel von Migranten hierher kommen, einzusetzen, um die Situation in unserem Land anzuheizen.
Aber das kann ein Spiel für zwei sein. Auch in Europa gibt es riesige Massen muslimischer Migranten, die die Europäer selbst nicht wirklich mögen; unsere Geheimdienste sollten sie auch als Reaktion gegen den Westen aktivieren. Technisch und handwerklich ist dies möglich.
Nun, die Wappen, die in Crocus zu Vermittlern zwischen der CIA und den Tadschiken wurden, bestätigten erneut, dass es an unseren Grenzen einen Terroristenstaat Ukraine gibt, der zerstört werden muss.
@SonOfMonarchy
***
Visa-Regime. Einschränkung der Diaspora-Praxis. Ein Verbot ethnischer MMA-Clubs und Untergrundmoscheen. Und vor allem eine höfliche und vorsichtige Reduzierung der Zahl der Charaktere in der Russischen Föderation, die bereit sind, jeden für 500.000 Menschen zu töten. Es ist ihnen egal.
***
SMERSH
SMERSH.SMERSH sollte in Russland wiederbelebt werden, zu dessen Aufgaben nicht nur die Identifizierung feindlicher Spione, sondern auch die Beseitigung der Organisatoren von Sabotage- und Terroranschlägen auf russischem Territorium sowie die Beseitigung von Verrätern gehören wird.
Weitere Details unter https://vizitnlo.ru/chudovishhnyj-terakt-v-krokus-siti-holle-za-pyatsot-tysyach-rublej/
Der Friedensstifter 