Die FDP bezeichnet ihre EU-Spitzenkandidatin auf neuen Plakaten als „Oma Courage“. Dieser Versuch, sich ans Erbe Bertolt Brechts anzubiedern, ist nach hinten losgegangen: Wussten die PR-Leute nicht um den problematischen Charakter von Brechts „Mutter Courage“? Oder ist das alles ein geplanter Coup, um die FDP ins Gespräch zu bringen? Wie auch immer: Wenn Strack-Zimmermann sich schon selber in die Nähe einer der bekanntesten Kriegsprofiteurinnen des Theaters rückt, dann sollte man diese Steilvorlage dankend annehmen. Ein Kommentar von Tobias Riegel.
Die FDP bestreitet den EU-Wahlkampf unter anderem mit einem Plakat der Kandidatin Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann, auf dem diese als „Oma Courage“ angepriesen wird – eine klare Anspielung auf das 1938/39 von Bertolt Brecht geschriebene Theaterstück „Mutter Courage und ihre Kinder“. Wahlkämpfe sind oft Zeiten der peinlichen Selbstüberhöhung. Doch diese Kampagne der FDP verdient dann doch kurze Aufmerksamkeit.
Zunächst ist der Vorgang Ausdruck einer Zeit der Begriffsverwirrungen: Die FDP besitzt mittlerweile die Dreistigkeit zu versuchen, sich sogar indirekt am Erbe Brechts zu vergreifen, einem expliziten Gegner von neoliberaler Politik und Kriegstreiberei. Aber dieser Versuch der Brecht-Vereinnahmung ist für die FDP erwartungsgemäß nach hinten losgegangen: Die Schöpfer der Kampagne waren gedanklich wohl eher bei aktuellen pseudolinken Phänomenen wie den „Omas gegen Rechts“ als bei der Figur der Mutter Courage – denn diese Figur ist ein problematischer Charakter, der sich unbelehrbar am 30-jährigen Krieg bereichern möchte. Dass das Theaterstück eine Warnung an jene Menschen ist, die hoffen, durch geschicktes Handeln von einem Krieg profitieren zu können, und dass Bertolt Brecht mit dem Werk zusätzlich prinzipielle Abscheu vor Kriegen vermitteln wollte, das hat aktuell etwa der Schauspieler Gerd Buurmann in einem Artikel im Medium Achgut.
Brecht-Bezug? Wie kommen Sie denn darauf…?
Der Vorgang beinhaltet neben dem Versuch, Brecht zu vereinnahmen, eine weitere Dreistigkeit: Konfrontiert mit der literarischen Fehldeutung, wird der mutmaßlich angestrebte „Brecht-Effekt“ nun von FDP-Seite einfach abgestritten. Auf die öffentliche Häme, die PR-Leute der FDP hätten da ein ziemliches Eigentor fabriziert, antwortet Strack-Zimmermann mit der Unterstellung, das Publikum würde die tatsächlichen Bezüge des Slogans einfach nicht kapieren:
„Vielleicht ist es auch einfach ein Eigentor, wenn man einen Zusammenhang herstellt, der nicht existiert und stattdessen den Zusammenhang zwischen Oma, Europa und Courage nicht versteht.“
Zusammengefasst: Erst möchten die PR-Strategen der FDP mutmaßlich auf die Unwissenheit des Publikums setzen, indem sie versuchen, sogar beim nicht gerade als neoliberalem oder kriegstreiberischem Vordenker bekannten Dichter Bertolt Brecht zu wildern. Dabei kommt ihnen allerdings die eigene Unwissenheit über den Inhalt des assoziierten Theaterstücks in die Quere. Als sich deshalb abzeichnet, dass das Plakat nach hinten losgehen könnte, weil Brechts Mutter Courage eine ziemlich unsympathische Kriegsprofiteurin ist, wird der Brecht-Bezug eilig zurückgewiesen. Um die Farce perfekt zu machen, wird nun, um nicht den Eindruck eines peinlichen Irrtums zu erwecken, ausgerechnet mit diesem Plakat eine Flucht nach vorne angetreten: Strack-Zimmermann posiert in diesem Video davor (ab Minute 1:05) und laut Medien findet der FDP-Generalsekretär das „Oma-Courage“-Motiv „besonders gut“.
„Sie glaubt an den Krieg bis zuletzt“
Ist der Vorgang vielleicht gar kein Versehen, sondern eine gewiefte Taktik, um die in deutschen Umfragen bei etwa fünf Prozent liegende FDP ins Gespräch zu bringen? Geht man Strack-Zimmermann auf den Leim, wenn man das nun thematisiert und sie damit noch bekannter macht?
Diese Risiko gehe ich ein – denn die FDP hat eine schöne Steilvorlage für politische Kontrahenten geschaffen, indem sie Strack-Zimmermann indirekt in eine Reihe mit „Mutter Courage“ gestellt hat. Laut Buurmann sagte Brecht selber zur Mutter Courage:
„Sie glaubt an den Krieg bis zuletzt. (…) Sie lernt so wenig aus der Katastrophe wie das Versuchskarnickel über Biologie lernt.“
En su momento [1] destacamos la importancia historiográfica esencial de La lucha por Barcelona, de Chris Ealham, la versión en español de Anarquismo en la ciudad: revolución y contrarrevolución en Barcelona (1898-1937), diciendo -y esperamos que nos perdonen la cita- que el retrato que el historiador británico hace del “conflicto social en la capital catalana […]
Im vom rationalen Verstand nicht mehr zu erfassenden Katalog des Versagens der Ampel-Regierung hat Außenministerin Annalena Baerbock ein neues Kapitel der Unfähigkeit hinzugefügt. In einem weiteren Geniestreich ihrer „feministischen Außenpolitik bestand sie darauf, dass die Nachfolge von Bertram Schmitt, dem einzigen deutschen Richter am Internationalen Strafgerichtshof (IStGH) in Den Haag, weiblich sein müsse. Ihre von ihr … Blamabel: Baerbock-Kandidatin für Internationalen Strafgerichtshof krachend durchgefallenweiterlesen
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
How can humanity allow an openly ongoing continuous mass murder of children, captive children at that, for over four months time, with the criminally insane maniac Netanyahu ordering the mass murder, promising the world he will not stop the killing for the foreseeable future.
Benjamin Netanyahu, as the Prime Minister of State of Israel, has commanded the murder, maiming and starving to death 31,000 captive Palestinians under Israel’s Illegal Military Occupation by his four months long orders for Israel’s air forces to continuously bomb and air strike Israel’s illegally military occupied Palestinian territory of Gaza, and by his orders blocking food, water, electricity, fuel and medicine from entering Gaza.[1][2]
Jan 30th Satellite data analysis showed the extent of the destruction.
The analysis suggests between 144,000 and 175,000 buildings across the whole Gaza Strip had been destroyed or damaged already six weeks before this writing. That was already between 50% and 61% of Gaza’s buildings.[1] As of March 5th, 70% of homes in Gaza are thought to be destroyed.[2]
Soon after Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack, Israel (read Netanyahu) blocked entry of all food, water, fuel, medicine and other supplies into Gaza. Under U.S. pressure, Netanyahu began to allow a trickle of aid trucks to enter from Egypt at the Rafah crossing, and in December opened one crossing from Israel into southern Gaza.[3]
Only someone criminally insane would starve children to death — if we hear of someone starving a child, don’t we call the police? Where is everyone? Especially in the global south where murderous colonialism is remembered?
At this writing a total of 13,430 children have been killed in the Gaza Strip by the Israeli airstrikes and ground operations ordered by criminally insane Prime Minister Netanyahu since Oct. 7.[4]
What is more precious than the life of a child and why hasn’t Netanyahu been stopped taking already 13,500 children’s lives?
It noted that 8,900 women were killed over the course of 150 days, adding that 7,000 people, 70% of whom are women and children, are still under the rubble or missing.[4]
Only a racist madman would continue ordering thousands the deaths of thousands of women along with their children.
The Gaza media office said that 364 health personnel and 132 journalists also lost their lives during the period.[4]
So it’s kill, kill everyone! And nobody says much about it.
Warning against a growing famine in Gaza, the Gaza Media Office said Israeli military has prevented the entry of food and aid supplies and has even targeted aid vehicles trying to reach the region, causing the deaths of dozens of people looking for food for their families.[4]
Under International Humanitarian Law,
“the occupying power must ensure the humane treatment of the population and provide for their basic needs, including food and medical care.”[5]
Netanyahu has had the Israeli military push 85% of Gaza’s population of 2.3 million into internal displacement amid acute shortages of food, clean water and medicine, while 60% of the enclave’s infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed, according to the UN.[4]
Israel not Netanyahu stands accused of genocide at the International Court of Justice. An interim ruling in January ordered Tel Aviv to stop genocidal acts and take measures to guarantee that humanitarian assistance is provided to civilians in Gaza.
Netanyahu Must be Prosecuted
Nations cannot be prosecuted. Individual perpetrators of crimes must be prosecuted.“Whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.” [Article IVConvention on Genocide.] That is an obligation of international customary law and therefore, binding on all States, whether or not they have ratified the Genocide Convention.[5] Article II reads, “Genocide means acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”[6] See this.
Unfortunately, there are more than a few Israelis, even rabbis, [7] who are led to believe genocide can be God’s will.
Deuteronomy 2:16:
“You must not let any living thing survive among the cities of these people the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance.”
Genesis 15:18:
“On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram and said, “To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.”
1 Samuel 15:3:
“… and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling” [Standard Bible]
Netanyahu is certainly not the only Israeli guilty of mass murdering Palestinians.
Israeli pilots know they kill children when dropping massive amount of bombs on city centres. Have the pilots been made to feel that God, and not just Netanyahu, is on their side in any and all circumstance?
Netanyahu uses October 7th Hamas led guerrilla attack as a pretext to annihilate the Palestinians trapped in Gaza.
Is Netanyahu crazed with guilt for Israelis having learned of his having funded factions within Hamas for years? (Netanyahu’s plan was keep Palestinians divided and thus less unable to create a Palestinian state.)
Netanyahu said, “whoever is against a Palestinian state should be for” transferring the funds to Gaza, because maintaining a separation between the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Hamas in Gaza helps prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state. [Jerusalem Post, March 12, 2019] [8]
Media fabricates Israel as victim: Netanyahu as saviour, Western journalists work as accessories to genocide through ‘news’ selection and omissions.
The United Nations human rights chief on Friday condemned the record expansion of illegal Israeli apartheid settlements in the occupied West Bank including East Jerusalem and the “dramatic increase” in violence against Palestinians by Israeli occupation forces and settlers. Over 720,000 Israeli settlers live illegally in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.
”Reports this week that Netanyahu has approved plans to build a further 3,476 settler homes in fly in the face of international law,”
According to the report, Israeli occupation forces and settlers have killed at least 413 Palestinians—including 107 children—while wounding more than 4,600 others in the West Bank since October 7. [9]
Israel’s generations long illegal and very often murderous occupation of Palestinian lands and settler colonialism notwithstanding, CIA-overseen PPS,CNN,CBS,NBC,ABC,FOX CNN, and other U.S. and European entertainment/news conglomerates [10] have had their viewers, listeners and readers focus their attention on the 100+ Israelis held hostages without ever mentioning their release being bargained for some of the many thousands Palestinians including, women and children, imprisoned by Israel.
Corporation journalists for months have had their audiences watch, hear and read interviews of relatives of the Israeli hostages, while Israel and Netanyahu, with U.S. warplanes, bombs and missiles, have been committing genocide and making 80% of Gaza’s population of 2.3 million homeless.[11]
Mindbogglingly, criminal media has cruelly underreported Palestinian intense suffering as Israel blocked food, water, fuel, electricity and medicine from entering Gaza until the point when children began to die of malnutrition. Israel’s planned starvation is now a indescribably horrific double sided genocide as the bombing and shelling of starving captive Palestinians continues with U.S.A. constantly replenishing Israel’s used up munitions while its criminal media make ‘the hostages’ ‘the hostages’ ‘the 100+ hostages’ and Israel’s criticism of Palestinian freedom fighting guerrillas successful attack on October 7.
Netanyahu would not be able to continue to order the Gaza genocide withoutthe continuing supply of weaponry from the U.S.[12] and without CIA controlled media journalists, [10] who are accessories to the ongoing double genocide.[see earlier article: Hegemonic Western Colonialist Media Journalists Are Accessories to Israeli Mass Murder of Children, Counter Currents, Feb. 26, 2024. [13]
International recognition of Netanyahu as criminally insane would seem to be a step in the direction.
It might get more Israelis to be concerned, to rethink, and consider halting their ongoing horrific genocide. and since Netanyahu’s starvation of children genocide was backed from its beginning and for four months by the Biden administration, once it could be widely established or accepted world wide that Netanyahu is criminally insane, it would become easier to focus attention on the mental disability of U.S. President Biden, the facilitator of the genocide in Gaza.
The majority humanity of the Global South might become more vocal in condemnation of the genocide, Netanyahu and the present leader of violent Western hegemonic colonialist imperialism.
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Jay Janson is an archival research peoples historian activist, musician and writer; has lived and worked on all continents; articles on media published in China, Italy, UK, India and in the US by Dissident Voice, Global Research; Information Clearing House; Counter Currents and others; now resides in NYC; First effort was a series of articles on deadly cultural pollution endangering seven areas of life emanating from Western corporate owned commercial media published in Hong Kong’s Window Magazine 1993; Howard Zinn lent his name to various projects of his; Weekly column, South China Morning Post, 1986-87; reviews for Ta Kung Bao; article China Daily, 1989. Is coordinator of the Howard Zinn co-founded King Condemned US Wars International Awareness Campaign, and website historian of the Ramsey Clark co-founded Prosecute US Crimes Against Humanity Now Campaign, which contains a history of US crimes in 9 countries up to 2006 9 countries up to 2006
5. Regardless of how many claims it makes about annexation, under International Humanitarian Law, the occupying state does not acquire sovereignty over the occupied territory. The occupying power must ensure the humane treatment of the population and provide for their basic needs, including food and medical care.Oct 30, 2023 GENEVA CONVENTION RELATIVE TO THE PROTECTION OF CIVILIAN PERSONS IN TIME OF WAR OF 12 AUGUST 1949, Article 60 II. Responsibilities of the Occupying Power. page 189
7. Rabbi Dov Lior, a national- religious leader and the chief rabbi of Kiryat Arba and Hebron, published a letter on Monday saying that Jewish law permits destroying the entire Gaza Strip[Jerusalem Post, July 23, 2014]
12. The U.S. has provided (or is on track to provide) Israel over 25,000 tons of military supplies: dozens of F‑35 and F-15 fighter jets (to be received in the coming years), a dozen Apache helicopters, two thousand Hellfire missiles, MK‑84 bombs and Joint Direct Attack Munitions to guide them, Spice bombs, M141 bunker‑buster munitions, one million rounds of 7.62mm munitions and thousands of 155mm artillery shells, 30mm cannon munitions, night‑vision devices and much more. Meanwhile, the presence of U.S. surveillance drones in Gaza suggests the possibility of greater U.S. military involvement than previously thought. https://informationclearinghouse.blog/2024/03/08/complicity-in-genocide-the-case-against-the-biden-administration/12/
14. Complicity in Genocide—The Case Against the Biden Administration March 8, 2024, Information Clearing House
These briefs make it abundantly clear that the Biden administration, in its steadfast support of the Israeli government, is complicit in the ongoing genocide, the displacement of approximately 80% of Palestinians from their homes and the deaths of more than 29,000 so far in this latest chapter of a 76‑year-long Nakba (catastrophe) that never ended.
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the Translate Website button below the author’s name (only available in desktop version).
To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here.
Click the share button above to email/forward this article to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Feb. 5, 2024 – Novartis in the lead to acquire cancer drug developer MorphoSys-sources
Dec. 26, 2023 – Bristol Myers Squibb announces intent to buy RayzeBio for $4.1 billion (104% premium)
Nov. 22, 2023 – Boehringer Ingelheim expands immuno-oncology portfolio with the acquisition of bacterial cancer therapy specialist T3 Pharma
Oct. 8, 2023 – Bristol Myers Squibb announces purchase of Mirati Therapeutics for $5.8 billion
Oct. 3, 2023 – Eli Lilly to Acquire POINT Biopharma to Expand Oncology Capabilities into Next-Generation Radioligand Therapies
*
Mar. 11, 2024 – Pfizer bets on cancer drugs to recover from rapid decline of COVID business
Pfizer’s $43 billion acquisition of Seagen doubled Pfizer’s cancer drug pipeline to 60 different experimental programs
Pfizer had a 4 hour investor event last week
Chris Boshoff, a longtime Pfizer executive who leads Pfizer’s oncology research and development, said during the investor event that Pfizer has 10 manufacturing sites producing cancer drugs on three continents, while Seagen had just one.
Pfizer expects 2/3 of its oncology revenue to come from new drugs and new indications for existing products by end of decade.
The “outdo cancer” catchphrase caught on during Pfizer’s 60–second Super Bowl ad that it reportedly spent more than $14 million on — which boasted the big pharma company’s 175-history as as famous scientists like Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein rocked out to Queen’s “Don’t Stop Me Now.”
Pfizer said it can produce 8 blockbuster cancer drugs by 2030
Mar. 11, 2024 – Merck Completes $650 million Acquisition of Harpoon Therapeutics
“We continue to augment and diversify our oncology pipeline with innovative approaches to help people with cancer worldwide,” said Dr. Dean Y. Li, president, Merck Research Laboratories.
Harpoon has a number of cancer drugs in the pipeline called “T-cell engagers” for small cell lung cancer, neuroendocrine tumors, multiple myeloma, etc.
The acquisition is part of Merck’s focus on cancer and exploration of immuno-oncology. In fact, Merck said it has one of the industry’s largest development programs, spanning 30-plus tumor types. The biopharmaceutical giant added it continues to strengthen its portfolio through purchases, as with Harpoon.
Merck announced several deals in 2023, including the up to $610 million acquisition of biopharmaceutical company Caraway Therapeutics and its $10.8 billion purchase of Prometheus Bioscienes Inc.
“Using its proprietary Tri-specific T cell Activating Construct (TriTAC) platform, the engineered proteins tell a patient’s own T-cells to attack target cells that express specific proteins, or antigens, carried by the target cells. To that end, Harpoon’s ProTriTAC platform keeps the T-cell engager inactive until it reaches the tumor.”
Mar. 7, 2024 – Johnson & Johnson Completes Acquisition of Ambrx ($2.0 billion)
“Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) announced today it has successfully completed the acquisition of Ambrx Biopharma, Inc., a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company with a proprietary synthetic biology technology platform to design and develop next-generation antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), in an all-cash merger transaction for a total equity value of approximately $2.0 billion”
“the acquisition presents a distinct opportunity for Johnson & Johnson to design, develop and commercialize targeted oncology therapeutics”
“The Ambrx team has developed a promising pipeline and ADC platform that will be a strong complement and strategic fit to our oncology innovation strategy“
“Ambrx’s proprietary ADC technology incorporates the advantages of highly specific targeting monoclonal antibodies securely linked to a potent chemotherapeutic payload to achieve targeted and efficient elimination of cancer cells without the prevalent side effects typically associated with chemotherapy”
AbbVie has completed a $10.1 billion acquisition of cancer drug maker ImmunoGen.
“Together with ImmunoGen, we have the potential to continue redefining the standard of care for those living with cancer,” said Robert A. Michael, president and chief operating officer, AbbVie. “The addition of ImmunoGen’s treatment for ovarian cancer will accelerate our ability to help patients today, expand our oncology pipeline and drive long-term revenue growth well into the next decade.”
“ImmunoGen’s follow-on pipeline of ADCs further builds on AbbVie’s existing solid tumor pipeline of novel targeted therapies and next-generation immuno-oncology assets, which have the potential to create new treatment possibilities across multiple solid tumors and hematologic malignancies”
Feb. 5, 2024 – Novartis in the lead to acquire cancer drug developer MorphoSys ($1.6 billion Euros)
Novartis is in advanced talks to acquire MorphoSys AG (MORG.DE), a German developer of cancer treatments that has a market value of 1.6 billion euros ($1.7 billion)
MorphoSys main revenue generator is a lymphoma drug called Monjuvi
Monjuvi’s U.S. net product sales were $92 million in 2023, and that it expected these sales to come in between $80 million and $95 million in 2024. The company has said it expects revenue to go up as Monjuvi is approved for more indications.
Headquartered in Planegg, Germany, MorphoSys develops drugs to fight deadly forms of cancers such as myelofibrosis, which is a rare type of bone marrow cancer, and certain types of lymphomas.
Ultimately, the acquisition is not entirely driven by the portfolio, and Novartis is seeking to use its previous collaborative experience with MorphoSys to expand its developments internally
Dec. 26, 2023 – Bristol Myers Squibb announces intent to buy RayzeBio for $4.1 billion (104% premium)
The company’s RayzeBio acquisition bolsters the company’s longer-term effort to establish a presence in the buzzing radiopharma scene. By spending $62.50 per share to buy RayzeBio, BMS adds a pipeline of actinium-based radiopharmaceutical therapeutics (RPTs) to its fold.
“include potential treatments for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), small cell lung cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, among other cancers.”
actinium-based radiopharmaceutical therapeutics (RPTs) work by binding to tumor cells and killing the cancer cells through targeted radiation (my specialty)
“Acquiring RayzeBio’s differentiated actinium-based radiopharmaceutical platform will establish Bristol Myers Squibb’s presence in one of the most promising and fastest-growing new modalities for the treatment of patients with solid tumors—delivering radioactive payloads to cancer cells in a targeted manner,” BMS’ chief medical officer, Samit Hirawat, M.D., said in a statement.”
From RayzeBio’s perspective, the biotech believes Bristol’s “well-established presence in oncology and deep expertise in developing, commercializing and manufacturing treatments on a global scale makes it the ideal partner for RayzeBio at this important moment in our evolution,”
Major competitors in the radiopharma arena include Novartis and its established lutetium-based medicines Lutathera and Pluvicto, plus new entrant Eli Lilly after it forked over $1.4 billion for Point Biopharma Global.
Nov. 22, 2023 – Boehringer Ingelheim expands immuno-oncology portfolio with the (450 million CHF) acquisition of bacterial cancer therapy specialist T3 Pharma
“Despite the significant transformation of the cancer treatment landscape by immunotherapies, long-term remissions only occur in 15-20% of cancer patients. Boehringer Ingelheim aims to considerably increase this rate by utilizing complementary immuno-oncology platforms such as T-Cell Engagers (TcEs), oncolytic viruses, and cancer vaccines, which have the potential to turn cold tumors into hot ones, extending the benefits of immunotherapy to more patients”
“The acquisition of T3 Pharma will significantly expand our immuno-oncology pipeline portfolio and is synergistic with many of our existing R&D programs. This will bring us closer to achieving our vision of driving a paradigm shift in cancer care treatments”
“T3 Pharma has developed a unique platform using engineered Yersinia enterocolitica bacteria to deliver bioactive proteins directly and selectively into the tumor micro-environment, while sparing healthy tissues. The bacteria can be loaded with multiple immune-modulatory proteins of choice, enabling the design of immuno-oncology combination therapies in one single agent.”
“This strategy aims to enable smart combinations that deliver life-changing and best-in-class treatments that may offer the greatest benefit for people affected by cancer.”
Oct. 8, 2023 – Bristol Myers Squibb announces purchase of Mirati Therapeutics for $5.8 billion
U.S. health regulator had in December approved Mirati’s lung cancer drug, Krazati, to treat adults with advanced lung cancer.
The oral drug — the company’s only approved product — is designed to target a mutated form of a gene known as KRAS, which occurs in about 13% of non-small cell lung cancer
In early October, Bristol Myers Squibb moved on Mirati after a yearslong courtship, inking a buyout worth up to $5.8 billion for the cancer specialist and its FDA-approved lung cancer drug Krazati.
Oct. 3, 2023 – Eli Lilly to Acquire POINT Biopharma (for $1.4 billion) to Expand Oncology Capabilities into Next-Generation Radioligand Therapies
Eli Lilly announced a definitive agreement to acquire POINT Biopharma, radiopharmaceutical company with a pipeline of radioligand therapies in development for the treatment of cancer.
“POINT operates a 180,000-square-foot radiopharmaceutical manufacturing campus in Indianapolis, as well as a radiopharmaceutical research and development center in Toronto”
“POINT aims to transform precision oncology by combining a portfolio of targeted radioligand assets, a seasoned management team, an industry-leading pipeline, in-house manufacturing capabilities, and secured supply for medical isotopes including actinium-225 and lutetium-177”
“We are excited by the potential of this emerging modality and see the acquisition of POINT as the beginning of our investment in developing multiple meaningful radioligand medicines for hard-to-treat cancers”
“Over the past few years, we have seen how well-designed radiopharmaceuticals can demonstrate meaningful results for patients with cancer and rapidly integrate into standards of care, yet the field remains in the early days of the impact it may ultimately deliver,” said Jacob Van Naarden, President of Loxo@Lilly, the oncology unit of Eli Lilly and Company
“POINT’s lead programs are in late-phase development. PNT20021 is a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted radioligand therapy in development for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after progression on hormonal treatment”
My Take…
Pfizer spent $43 billion to acquire Seagen (42% premium).
Johnson & Johnson spent $2 billion to buy Ambrx.
AbbVie spent $10.1 billion to buy Immunogen at 95% premium.
Bristol Myers Squibb to buy Mirati Therapeutics for $5.8 billion at 52% premium.
Bristol Myers Squibb to buy RayzeBio for $4.1 billion at 104% premium
Novartis in the lead to acquire cancer drug developer MorphoSys ($1.6 billion Euros)
Eli Lilly is spending $1.4 billion to acquire Point Biopharma Global and according to Forbes, is paying a 90% premium.
Boehringer spent 450 million CHF to buy T3 Pharma and its targeted bacteria platform.
Conclusion
While the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Injured who develop Turbo Cancers are being gaslit by low level doctors and MD propagandists on Twitter and other social media, Big Pharma is in a literal feeding frenzy, buying up every “novel” cancer treatment imaginable at massive premiums.
When my Cancer Treatment Program was illegally sabotaged by Alberta Health Services starting in 2016, and AHS seriously harmed or outright murdered over 2450 of my cancer patients at Cross Cancer Institute in Edmonton, which led to a $13.5 million lawsuit against AHS which is still ongoing, there was no money in the cancer treatments I was providing (targeted radiopharmaceuticals).
In 2023, two of these acquisitions involve my Cancer Treatments & Expertise: Bristol Myers Squibb $4.1 billion deal for RayzeBio and Eli Lilly’s $1.4 billion deal for Point Biopharma Global. How times change.
Trudeau re-built my Cancer Program in Vancouver, British Columbia as “ARTMS” which was just acquired by Telix for $82 million on Mar.4, 2024 – how much investment Trudeau and his Liberal friends have in that (would make great investigative journalism for anyone interested).
Bottom line is, whether establishment doctors believe in mRNA Induced Turbo Cancer or not is irrelevant, hundreds of billions will be made treating it.
In 2023, the top 10 Big Pharma buyout deals came to $115.8 billion, increasing from 2022 ($65 billion) and 2021 ($53 billion).
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Dr. William Makis is a Canadian physician with expertise in Radiology, Oncology and Immunology. Governor General’s Medal, University of Toronto Scholar. Author of 100+ peer-reviewed medical publications.
The Worldwide Corona Crisis, Global Coup d’Etat Against Humanity
by Michel Chossudovsky
Michel Chossudovsky reviews in detail how this insidious project “destroys people’s lives”. He provides a comprehensive analysis of everything you need to know about the “pandemic” — from the medical dimensions to the economic and social repercussions, political underpinnings, and mental and psychological impacts.
“My objective as an author is to inform people worldwide and refute the official narrative which has been used as a justification to destabilize the economic and social fabric of entire countries, followed by the imposition of the “deadly” COVID-19 “vaccine”. This crisis affects humanity in its entirety: almost 8 billion people. We stand in solidarity with our fellow human beings and our children worldwide. Truth is a powerful instrument.”
Reviews
This is an in-depth resource of great interest if it is the wider perspective you are motivated to understand a little better, the author is very knowledgeable about geopolitics and this comes out in the way Covid is contextualized. —Dr. Mike Yeadon
In this war against humanity in which we find ourselves, in this singular, irregular and massive assault against liberty and the goodness of people, Chossudovsky’s book is a rock upon which to sustain our fight. –Dr. Emanuel Garcia
In fifteen concise science-based chapters, Michel traces the false covid pandemic, explaining how a PCR test, producing up to 97% proven false positives, combined with a relentless 24/7 fear campaign, was able to create a worldwide panic-laden “plandemic”; that this plandemic would never have been possible without the infamous DNA-modifying Polymerase Chain Reaction test – which to this day is being pushed on a majority of innocent people who have no clue. His conclusions are evidenced by renown scientists. —Peter Koenig
Professor Chossudovsky exposes the truth that “there is no causal relationship between the virus and economic variables.” In other words, it was not COVID-19 but, rather, the deliberate implementation of the illogical, scientifically baseless lockdowns that caused the shutdown of the global economy. –David Skripac
A reading of Chossudovsky’s book provides a comprehensive lesson in how there is a global coup d’état under way called “The Great Reset” that if not resisted and defeated by freedom loving people everywhere will result in a dystopian future not yet imagined. Pass on this free gift from Professor Chossudovsky before it’s too late. You will not find so much valuable information and analysis in one place. –Edward Curtin
ISBN: 978-0-9879389-3-0, Year: 2022, PDF Ebook, Pages: 164, 15 Chapters
During a recent discussion that I had with two friends who had lived for several years in the USA, I expressed concern in particular regarding three aspects of US society which I had been studying recently:
an alarming rise in child depression prompting professional organizations to speak of a national emergency related to this,
an alarming rise in the maternal mortality rate and
a very high number of poverty-related deaths.
My friends simply refused to believe all of this and instead gave me friendly advice on re-checking. However after seeing the relevant references they expressed great surprise how they had missed these important aspects earlier.
This was not an unexpected response, given the fact that several deeply troubling aspects of US society do not receive the attention these deserve.
It is even more difficult to find an honest analysis of several such important aspects. The response of my friends prompted me to bring together and analyse more such aspects at one place, in the hope that this may contribute in a small and humble to re-emphasizing the urgency of social and policy reform in the USA.
Life Expectancy and Excess Deaths
Concern has been expressed by health experts in the USA that life-expectancy in this country has been reducing steadily in comparison to levels attained in several other rich countries. This has led some researchers to explore the number of excess deaths in the USA (or number of ‘missing Americans’) which they define as the deaths which are in excess of the number that would have taken place if the life-expectancy rates in the USA had remained at par with those of comparable rich countries.
One such important recent study by Jacob Bor, Andrew C. Stokes and others has been published in the journal PNAS Nexus on May 29, 2023. This study has estimated the number of such excess deaths in the USA in 2019 at 622,534.
During the next two years the number of such excess deaths went up to over a million, but as these were COVID years and a number of other issues become involved, we will go here only by the lower number of excess deaths recorded for a normal year at over 600,000. So what this study is saying that on the basis of comparisons with other rich countries, the USA should have been able to achieve the sort of life expectancy that results in avoiding over 600,000 deaths in a year.
Poverty Related Mortality
Earlier another study by David Brady on only poverty related mortality published in the USA in JAMA Internal Medicine in April 2023 (for over 15 years age group) had estimated that there are 183,000 poverty related deaths in a year in the USA.
UN data tells us that at a time when maternal death rate was declining in most countries, in the USA maternal death rate increased to a shocking extent from 12 to 21 during 2000-2020.
More such data can be provided to show that the number of excess, easily avoidable deaths in the USA is shockingly high at well over half a million every year. A very big contribution to human welfare can be made by taking steps to ensure that these avoidable deaths are actually avoided.
The steps that are needed for improvements are well-known in a country so blessed with eminent scholars.
Discrimination, Social Inequality and Health Services
In a nutshell, health services have to be improved in a big way for all weaker sections without any discrimination, inequalities must be reduced in a big way so that the poorer people have much better access to nutrition, environment and safety must be much better protected, shelter and health and overall social conditions need to be improved to make way for better physical and mental health while avoiding all harmful addictions.
The bigger question is—when these solutions are well-known, why have not these been adopted and why the situation in some importance respects continues to deteriorate? This is the really crucial question which needs to go beyond the analysis generally available in academic papers as this concerns important political issues of injustice. We need to ask why billions are easily available in the USA for weapons but even millions are not available for some important aspects of social justice, why billions worth of tax gifts can be given to the rich but millions worth of essential expenditure for the poorest is more difficult to find.
The fact is that a system of injustice has become so deeply established in the USA that solutions outside this system are difficult to implement. What should be emphasized is that this system of injustice is causing even more harm to people of other countries than what it is causing to people within USA.
Due to this system if 600,000 excess deaths a year are caused in the USA, then a similar or higher number deaths are likely being caused in other countries as well.
The USA’s Forever Wars
The number of deaths caused by the USA’s forever wars is in many millions as can be seen by adding up the immediate and longer-term mortality figures of wars in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan and elsewhere (in addition of course there was the use of atomic bombs against Japan after Japan had already been defeated for all practical purposes).
Then there are a large number of deaths caused by arbitrary imposition of wide-ranging sanctions, highly unjust interventions and coups in other countries which resulted in a large number of deaths (in countries like Congo, Chile, Iran, Nicaragua, Haiti, Greece etc.). Then there are also the large number of deaths associated with exports of weapons as well as several highly hazardous products and technologies. Hence in brief we can say that unjust systems in the USA cause avoidable 600,000 excess deaths in the USA and a somewhat higher number in other countries annually. Excess deaths in other countries are defined here as deaths caused by various injustices of the US (or allies acting under US leadership), whether in the form of wars or coups or subversions or exploitation.
These excess deaths inside and outside USA are two parts of the same unjust system, an important aspect missed by most academic studies. Once you establish an unjust system that inflicts unjust wars on other countries, then the same unjust system adopts internal unjust and discriminative policies within the country too, although this may get partially softened by electoral considerations at times.
Another reflection of how internal and external injustices are closely related is the fact that the leaders with the biggest promise of justice have been assassinated within the USA as also in other countries with fingers pointed towards the same US agency.
This is how the assassinations of President John Kennedy and President Allende are related, this is how the assassinations of Presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Sr. and President Lumumba are related, this is how the killings of Martin Luther King Jr. and Che Guevara are related.
Leaders most capable of bringing justice and peace are removed before they can achieve their potential.
So as several eminent scholars have suggested the solution for the USA to avoid excess deaths is to improve health care and socio-economic conditions for the lower half of the population, but in addition if we go a step further and ask why this has not happened in recent years, then we also need to say more clearly and loudly that the established unjust system must be challenged and replaced by a system that is based on justice internally and externally.
Such struggles against well-established systems of injustice are needed in so many countries but most of all these are needed in the USA as this is the most powerful and influential country in the world whose policies have a worldwide impact. From a world perspective the struggle is against the unjust establishment of the USA, just the top 5% or so, and never against the people of the USA and in fact the struggling American people need all the worldwide solidarity to help in their struggles.
The creation of a justice-based USA is a very important part of the worldwide struggle against injustice. The aim should never be to replace a world dominated by the USA by a world dominated by China but instead our aim should be to create a USA, a China and the entire world based on justice, peace and environment protection.
The dominant thinking at world-level is of equating ever-increasing income and wealth as well as the accompanying access to more and more material goods and services with increasing levels of happiness. But this is quite often not reflected in the reality of rich or even richest societies. An increasingly important aspect of socio-economic reality of world is that significant levels of distress can exist in the middle of high GNP levels and other signs of prosperity. This can be the result of economic inequalities, social contradictions and other less understood factors.
Food Insecurity
In the context of the USA, a study by the Urban Institute in 2018 found that nearly 40 per cent of adults and their families in USA struggled to afford at least one basic need for health care, housing, utilities or food in 2017, even in normal conditions of high employment levels.
In this study based on a well-being and basic needs survey in the age-group 18-64, 23% said that they were food insecure in the last 12 months. 18% struggled to pay medical bills while almost the same percentage decided to go without some required medical treatment due to costs.
In a population of more than 330 million people and 128 million households in the USA, around 45% persons suffer from chronic diseases, many from multiple chronic diseases. Regularity of medicines is very important for all of them, but price of medicines in the USA is often much higher than in comparable countries. Nearly 40 million medically consulted injuries and poisoning cases are reported in a year. 12 million vehicles are involved in crashes in one year.
With the advent of COVID and much higher unemployment levels, the situation in terms of struggle to meet basic needs worsened. What is more, in 2020 it was reported that child poverty levels have been found to be 1.5 times higher than adult poverty levels. As for senior citizens, the Elderly Economic Security Standard Index found that in 2016 a majority of them lacked the “financial resources required to meet basic needs.”
Poverty and Social Distress
The Eviction Lab, Princeton University, has estimated that there are 3.7 million eviction cases in the USA in a typical year. The authorities intervened in COVID times to prevent the likely escalation in evictions by imposing moratoriums but now these are being phased down. The rent relief grants are also getting reduced considerably as funds committed for this have been exhausted in several states.
Nearly 28 per cent of US households are single person households. A survey by Cigna before the onset of COVID revealed that almost half of the adults feel lonely sometimes or all the time. Increasing loneliness has been associated with significant increase of dementia, coronary disease and stroke.
Nearly 50% of all US marriages end in divorce or separation. In households with children, 50% of divorces lead to push towards poverty. Children suffer very adverse short-term and long-term impacts of divorce and separation.
10 to 12 million persons, mostly women, are physically abused in a year by an intimate partner, nearly 20 per minute.
On a typical day, about 20,000 phone calls are placed on domestic violence helplines, mostly by women. A report on child abuse is made every 10 seconds. Authorities trace 656,000 victims of child maltreatment in a year, but the problem is bigger. More than 4 million referrals are made to child protection agencies in a year.
About 10 million people face incarceration in a year. Over 1.2 million violent crimes are reported in a year, while the actual number is higher.
1 in 4 adults –26%–suffer from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year, several from more, according to the National Institute of Mental Health Disorders. A 2019 study published in JAMA Paediatrics analysing official data reported that 1 in 6 children are affected by a mental health disorder. During the last decade, a big rise in depression, even self-harm has been reported among adolescents, even before the onset of COVID.
1.4 million suicide attempts take place in a year. Suicide among 10 to 14 year old girls doubled , while emergency room admissions for suicidal ideation and attempts by children and adolescents also roughly doubled during the last decade.
A significant part of distress is due to high levels of inequalities– the bottom 50% of population has only 1.5% of the country’s wealth—but different kinds of distress and tensions exist at high levels in all sections of society.
We have many reports and studies on various aspects of increasing distress from time to time, only to discover some time later that remedial actions based on these have at best provided some temporary relief only while the deeper causes remain. Clearly this must change. Distress reduction based on a comprehensive understanding and deeper linkages must become the main focus of domestic policy.
At a wider level this draws attention to the highly mistaken notion of equating higher income and wealth necessarily with genuine happiness, let alone any sincerely felt feeling of a life well lived. More debate and dialogue on this, leading to better understanding of the limits of understanding life’s worth in terms of merely income and wealth, can help to pave the way for meaningful social change at several levels.
All this is particularly important in the context of understanding distress and uncertainly levels among children, adolescents and young adults. The latest official statistics of ‘Youth Risk Behaviour Survey’ (YRBS), USA, 2011-2021 released recently by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (CDC), USA, have revealed truly alarming levels of distress among US youth.
From a distance youth of other countries perceive life of youth in USA to be a life of joy and fun in a prosperous land free of various social inhibitions, and crave for a similar life. The results of this survey may be an eye opener for them too and highlight the need for a different path.
As the USA is one of the highest GDP countries, the prevalence, persistence and increase of such high levels of distress among US youth calls for serious analysis to find real causes as well as solutions so that US youth can have a happier and more meaningful life.
The YRBS statistics tell us that in year 2021 42% of US high school students “experienced persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness”. When this figure was reported at 28% in 2011 this was considered to be quite high and hence brought forth calls for several remedial actions. Despite these, the number has increased persistently and steadily during the decade—30% in 2013 and 2015, 31% in 2017, 37% in 2019 and 42% in 2021. In the case of female students, this percentage is even higher—in 2021 as many as 57% of female high school students experienced persistent feelings of sadness and hopelessness.
Further, in 2021, the YRBS tells us, 29% of high school students experienced poor mental health. In the case of female students, 41% experienced poor mental health.
What is even more alarming in the YRBS data is that in 2021, as many as 22% high school students in the USA “seriously considered attempting suicide”. Here also we see an overall increasing trend from 16% in 2011 to 22% in 2021. In the case of female students this number was as high as 30% in year 2021. In other words, almost one-third of female high students in the USA were so distressed as to “seriously consider attempting suicide” during this year.
In fact the YRBS statistics tell us that as many as 18% of high school students in the USA had actually “made a suicide plan” in 2021. This also had an overall increasing trend from 13% in 2011 to 18% in 2021. In the case of female students this percentage was again higher at 24 in year 2021.
Most sadly, the YRBS survey tells us that as many as 10% of high school students in the USA actually attempted suicide in 2021. This means that one out of 10 USA high school students attempted suicide in 2021. This percentage increased from 8 in 2011 to 10 in 2021. The number of female students who attempted suicide in 2021 was again higher at 13%.
Another aspect of distress suffered more by female students related to sexual violence. 18% of female students experienced sexual violence by anyone during the past one year.
These high levels of distress are extremely troubling and have increased despite remedial actions proposed by eminent experts in the past. Instead of merely repeating such advice, there is clearly need for deeper introspection and more sincere efforts to find real causes and solutions. More than individual consultations, efforts to find the illness of entire society are needed. While eminent experts are deeply concerned about this issue, they may be missing some wider important issues due to examining issues more closely in a narrower framework.
In particular it is important to examine the links of the increasing internal distress of USA society with the increasing aggression of the USA at international level. As this writer has emphasized several times, such links need to be recognized and will help the peace movement within the USA to mobilize people to create a society which is at peace with itself and with the entire world, devoted more to reducing its own distress as a higher priority.
Another question that arises relates to the higher distress suffered by female students (compared to male students) according to almost all criteria. If the USA is supposed to be a society based on gender justice, then why is this happening? This should be seen in the context of high levels of violence and distress suffered by women and female children in other contexts also in the USA, for which a lot of additional data is available. However confining ourselves only to YRBS data for the time being, isn’t it alarming that as many as 57% of female high school students experience persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness, 41% experience poor mental health, 18% experience sexual violence in a year, 30% seriously consider attempting suicide in a year, 24% make a suicide plan in a year and 13% actually attempt suicide in a year, all this at levels much higher than male students.
The USA has frequently criticized gender injustice in other countries but should it not also look inwards to ask why girls in the USA are so distressed despite the outer appearance of a very free and liberated society. In this context also there is a clear need to explore linkages between internal distress and aggression on the one hand and massive distress caused by aggression in other countries on the other hand.
Once these wider links are recognized, then these can pave the way for creating a US society which is at peace with itself as well as with the rest of the world. This should be one of the highest priorities for our deeply troubled world.
Other than YRBS data, there have been several other indications of the deep distress within US society. This is evident from the call given twice in recent times by the top child health organizations in the country for declaring a mental health national emergency for children and adolescents, given the scale of these problems. If this won’t wake up a society to the need for wider introspection, what else will?
One of the clearer aspects of the existing sad situation is that much more resources are needed for meeting the needs of the bottom 50% of the people of the USA who currently have only 1.5 per cent of the country’s wealth. It will not be difficult to find resources for them as wealth and income are currently so highly concentrated at the top levels in the USA. What is more military spending by the USA is extremely high. Most US official figures mention military expenditure in a year of around 880 billion dollars, but other defence analysts also mention higher figures mention going up to 1.4 trillion or 1400 billion. Without sacrificing defence considerations in any realistic sense and with some overdue reforms to curb corruption, wastage and overpricing by contractors, it should be possible to cut the military spending by about one-half or so, making available between 400 to 700 billion dollars annually for meeting essential welfare needs of American and other people. A figure of just 20 billion dollars has been frequently mentioned in terms of significantly meeting the needs of homeless people in the USA, and a somewhat similar figure would go a long way in reducing hunger to a significant extent in the USA. In the context of reducing extreme poverty and hunger to a significant extent at the world level, figures of 100 to 50 billion dollars per year each have been frequently mentioned.
Multibillion “Humanitarian Wars” versus Peace, Justice and Welfare
Clearly very big gains are waiting to be achieved at the level of the USA and at world level if only the USA can become a country which is much more oriented towards peace, justice and welfare.
On the other hand, an idea of the highly destructive consequences of USA’s existing policy distortions is conveyed by the fact that in terms of direct as well as indirect deaths the War on Terror alone has caused 4.5 million deaths (this estimate of Brown University also needs updating and include some other counties as well) and has cost the USA 8000 billion dollars (about a billion dollars a day or 12000 dollars per second over a 22 year period).
This is why we stated earlier too that while reforms are needed in all countries but it is reforms in the USA for creating a society based on peace and welfare which are most urgently needed and can benefit the entire humanity. Hence the people of the USA who are dedicated to peace, justice and environment protection have a very big responsibility for bringing these reforms. It is people’s movements on which highest hopes rest, keeping in view the increasing alienation of top leadership from these important reforms.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Bharat Dogra is Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include Protecting Earth for Children, Planet in Peril, Earth without Borders and A Day in 2071. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.
The original source of this article is Global Research
On Monday, Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said that many large and small economies around the world have expressed willingness to start trading in rupee terms with India, which could be a “game-changing” development for India’s trade. This is another important step taken towards de-dollarisation and would better protect India’s economy in case of any future US-led sanctions.
India’s Union Minister said some of the countries that have expressed willingness to start trading in rupees include neighbouring Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, as well as Gulf countries.
“At some point, more and more developed countries and countries in the Far East will also join the bandwagon,” he said, adding that “more and more countries are realising the advantages of trading in their own domestic currencies and a shift towards direct transactions between local currencies is gaining traction.”
He said that more and more countries are realising the benefits of trading in their domestic currencies, and there is a growing shift towards direct transactions between local currencies.
“Gradually, the conscience is setting in that rather than converting all the transactions into a third currency, both ways add significantly to transaction costs,” the minister said.
It is recalled that the United Arab Emirates was the first to accept payment in rupees for crude oil.
“We started with the UAE. The UAE was one of the first countries to accept this. It’s now picking up traction. We get a lot of countries who come and talk to us that they would like to also initiate direct transactions between the local currency and the rupee,” Goyal said.
India has already started trading in rupees with neighbouring countries like Nepal and Bhutan. Additionally, the rupee has been included in Sri Lanka’s list of designated foreign currencies to facilitate trade. Changes have been made in the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) to support the use of the rupee in international trade with the aim of establishing the rupee as a global currency.
Using rupees and other local currencies is especially important in maintaining longstanding New Delhi-Moscow ties in the face of US sanctions against the Eurasian country.
Trade turnover between India and Russia increased in 2023 to a record $64 billion, with India’s imports of Russian products increasing by 1.8 times to $60.1 billion and exports of Indian goods increasing by 1.4 times to $4 billion. Russia is now the second-largest supplier of goods to India, trailing only China, and Russia has also overtaken Saudi Arabia to become India’s fourth-largest trading partner.
Although the United States remained India’s main trading partner last year, by the end of the year, the trade volume between the two countries declined by 9% to $119 billion. This is followed by trade volume with China at $116 billion, which declined by 2%, and trade volume with the United Arab Emirates at $78 billion, which declined by 7%.
Meanwhile, according to Arun Garodia, Chairman of the Engineering Export Promotion Council of India (EEPC), a body of over 12,000 small engineering goods exporters, during the current fiscal year ending in March, Indian exporters are expected to receive over a billion dollars’ worth of payments in rupees from Russia.
“Exporters are happy that they are receiving payments in rupees for exports to Russia,” he said.
Indian commerce ministry data showed that the South Asian country’s total exports to Russia rose 46.2% to $2.7 billion in the first eight months of fiscal year 2023/24, ending in March, while imports rose 54.8% to $40.5 billion during the same period. This growth in trade would not have been possible if India had not taken active steps in de-dollarisation by advancing trade in rupees and other currencies.
Following the launch of the special military operation against Ukraine, Russia was banned from using the SWIFT financial messaging system and, therefore, the US dollar to settle payments. Although this was supposed to create difficulties in India-Russia trade, India overtook Europe as the main buyer of offshore oil from Russia in 2022 and began buying Russian oil for UAE dirhams and rubles.
By imposing such measures against Russia, Washington accelerated de-dollarisation as it forced large economies like India to pursue what Indian foreign minister EAM Jaishankar terms “strategic autonomy.” India and other countries like Brazil did not end their relations with Russia just for the sake of the US, and Western sanctions only forced such countries to find ulterior methods and thus accelerate the de-dollarisation process.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Ahmed Adel is a Cairo-based geopolitics and political economy researcher. He is a regular contributor to Global Research.
The original source of this article is Global Research
Nathaniel Rothschild richtete im April 2022 eine Botschaft an Mitglieder der britischen Regierung. Darin wies er klar und deutlich auf die Ziele und Mittel im Ukraine-Konflikt hin.
Die Beteiligung Großbritanniens am Beginn des Krieges wurde von verschiedenen Analysten oft bestätigt, obwohl sie von den mutmaßlichen Kriegsverursachern systematisch bestritten wurde.
Beispielsweise teilen Social-Media-Nutzer einen Brief, den der Finanzier Nathaniel Rothschild angeblich nach der russischen Invasion in der Ukraine am 24. Februar an die britische Regierung geschickt hat und in dem es heißt, der russische Präsident Wladimir Putin sei „der gefährlichste Mann seit der Niederlage Hitlers“.
Der Text in einem Beitrag lautet: „Nathaniel Rothschild: „Ohne die Ukraine wird die globale Weltordnung nicht überleben.“
Der Text auf dem geposteten Bild lautet: „Der Erbe der Familie Rothschild, Nathaniel Rothschild, schrieb heute an Mitglieder der britischen Regierung, in dem er seine Ansicht darlegte, dass Wladimir Putin „der gefährlichste Mann seit der Niederlage Hitlers ist, mit Xi Jinping an zweiter Stelle“, und erklärte dass „die Ukraine eine wichtige Figur ist, die wir auf dem geopolitischen Schachbrett nicht verlieren dürfen.“ Der Erbe des Rothschild-Vermögens sagte: „Russland muss aus dem internationalen Banken- und Wirtschaftssystem ausgeschlossen werden.“ Wir müssen Russland mit allen Mitteln in die Knie zwingen, um ein starkes Signal an die Chinesen zu senden und unser globales System von Normen und liberalen Werten zu verteidigen.“
Im Text heißt es weiter: „Wir sollten uns keinen Illusionen hingeben: Wenn wir zulassen, dass Wladimir Putin die Ukraine übernimmt, wird das ein Signal an unsere Feinde, insbesondere Iran, China und Nordkorea, senden, dass wir angesichts dieser Bedrohung nichts unternehmen werden.“ ein Ansturm der Gewalt. Im Wesentlichen bedeutet unser derzeitiger Weg des Verzichts auf militärische Maßnahmen, dass unsere globale Ordnung auf den Beinen ist. Ich fordere Sie auf, mehr Kräfte gegen Russland und seine Stellvertreter zu richten, den „Informationskrieg“ zur Korrektur der öffentlichen Meinung, insbesondere im Internet, zu intensivieren und Waffen an unsere Freunde in der Ukraine zu schicken. Ohne die Ukraine wird die Weltordnung möglicherweise nicht überleben“, heißt es in dem Beitrag weiter.
Das Engagement der britischen Regierung und ihrer Streitkräfte, das aus den Nachrichtenereignissen über den Krieg in der Ukraine hervorgeht, zeigt jedoch indirekt die Übereinstimmung dieser Politik mit der militanten Ausrichtung britischer Führer wie des Königs, der Freimaurerei und der Rothschilds.
Zunächst weist der Eigentümer seine hochrangigen Beamten an, den Militäreinsatz gegen Russland zu intensivieren.
Zweitens wird Russland durch die Gleichsetzung Putins mit Hitler von Rothschild zum Feind der Welt erklärt (mit „Welt“ meinen wir den Teil des Planeten, der von den Ultraglobalisten kontrolliert wird), und daher sind alle Maßnahmen gegen Russland gerechtfertigt.
Drittens wird der Sieg über Russland als militärischer Sieg mit allen daraus resultierenden Konsequenzen verstanden.
Viertens und vor allem glaubt Rothschild, dass sich in den Kämpfen in der Ukraine das Schicksal der vom Westen geführten Weltordnung entscheidet und ein russischer Sieg dazu führen könnte, dass diese Ordnung dadurch nicht überleben wird. „Alles ist weg: Der Gips ist entfernt, der Kunde geht.“
Rothschild, einer der Meister des Weltspiels, demonstrierte erneut und mit einem offensichtlichen Maß an Hysterie, offen und ohne sich zu verstecken: In der Ukraine kämpfen wir, Russland, nicht so sehr mit den Ukronazis, sondern mit der Post- Der Westen, mit der neuen Weltordnung, die er aufbaut, aus der die gegenwärtige Bourgeoisie, wie einst Hitler, den Rest von uns mit dem Radiergummi der Geschichte auslöschen will.
Es war, als wären wir wieder im Jahr 1941.
Wieder die Nazis, nur nicht die Deutschen, sondern das ukrainische Gesindel, Neo-Banderaisten; wieder die Angelsachsen und stachelte sie zum freudigen Grinsen der Europäischen Unionisten an, die wir 1945 losgeworden sind, diese Außenseiter von Hitlers Euroreich.
Es ist klar, warum diese ganze Bande, die den Nationalsozialismus erbt, den 9. Mai – unseren Sieg – so sehr auslöschen will. Denn dies ist ein Sieg über sie, über ihre Väter und Großväter, die nicht nur unter Hitler fielen, sondern ihm dienten und entweder für seinen Sieg arbeiteten, wie die Tschechen auf dem Hermann-Göring-Werk (Vorkriegs-Skoda – ein Drittel der Panzer). für die Ostfront wurden dort gemacht) oder kamen als Teil der Nazi-Horden in unser Land (Ungarn, Finnen, Balten, Rumänen, Spanier, Italiener, Franzosen – ein Paar von jedem europäischen Geschöpf), um dort zu bleiben. Und den Hass auf die Russen mit dem Versuch, Drang nach Osten zu wiederholen, den Nachkommen überlassen.
Der Artikel wurde erstmals im Jahr 2021 veröffentlicht.
Die Rothschilds kontrollierten Russland durch ihre Oligarchen, die Wladimir Putin schufen. Oder zumindest dachten sie, sie hätten die Kontrolle. Lord Jacob Rothschild schuf die Oligarchen und setzte sie dazu ein, die meisten Vermögenswerte Russlands zu stehlen, indem sie den Kauf ihrer Industrien für ein paar Cent pro Dollar finanzierten.
Lord Jacob Rothschild hat nun die Kontrolle über Russland verloren, und der Westen hat Sanktionen gegen seine Oligarchen verhängt, als Strafe dafür, dass er Putin erlaubt hat, an der Macht zu bleiben. Jetzt wurde den Oligarchen befohlen, Putin zu stürzen. Präsident Biden ist sich dessen in seinen Briefings bewusst und hat die Katze aus dem Sack gelassen. Biden sagt uns im Wesentlichen, dass Putin gehen wird, weil die Oligarchen ihn loswerden werden. Hier machte der Präsident einen Fehler, als er Putin mitteilte, dass er abgesetzt werden würde. Allerdings bedeutet Putin Russland nicht wirklich etwas, und die USA können das Militär und die Geheimdienste nicht abziehen, sodass die Krise nicht verschwinden wird, selbst wenn Putin verschwindet.
Das ist die sehr seltsame Logik hinter den jüngsten Aussagen der russischen Zentralbank, dass sie ihre Reserven aus operativen Gründen im Ausland aufbewahren müssten und ihre Beschlagnahme daher unvermeidlich sei. Wenn das gesamte Gold und die Reserven der russischen Zentralbank während einer traditionellen Krise in Russland wären, könnten sie bei Bedarf ins Ausland transferiert werden. Andernfalls könnten sie im Falle eines Notfalls wie dem, mit dem sie derzeit konfrontiert sind, in Russland behalten werden. An der Spitze der russischen Zentralbank steht eine US-Auslandsagentin namens Elvira Nabuillina. Es ist nicht ungewöhnlich, dass Zentralbanker eine doppelte Loyalität haben, da sie einen Club bilden, der von der Familie Rothschild geleitet wird. Die US-Zentralbank wird von den Rothschilds kontrolliert, ebenso wie die russische Zentralbank. Somit steht Elvira tatsächlich unter der Kontrolle der Rothschilds, auch wenn sie es selbst vielleicht nicht weiß. Sie weiß, dass sie Russland nicht Bericht erstattet. Einmal im Monat veranstaltet die Bank für Internationalen Zahlungsausgleich in Basel, Schweiz, extraterritoriale Treffen der Zentralbanker, bei denen alle Zentralbankrichtlinien für die Welt festgelegt werden. Diese Herren berichten nicht an ihre Regierungen, sondern an Rothschild-Agenten. Werfen wir einen kleinen Blick auf die russische Geschichte.
Russland wurde nach der bolschewistischen Revolution, die sie durch Lenin und Trotzki organisierten, von den Rothschilds übernommen. Baron Edouard de Rothschild finanzierte erstmals 1904 Japans Angriff und Krieg gegen Russland, indem er seinen Agenten Jacob Schiff einsetzte und nicht die von ihnen ebenfalls kontrollierte Firma JP Morgan.
Schiffs vielleicht berühmteste finanzielle Aktion ereignete sich während des Russisch-Japanischen Krieges (1904-1905). Schiff traf sich im April 1904 in Paris mit Takahashi Korekiyo, dem stellvertretenden Gouverneur der Bank von Japan (Pariser Hauptquartier von Baron Edouard de Rothschild). Schiff erklärte sich bereit, dem Kaiserreich Japan Kredite in Höhe von 200 Millionen US-Dollar zu gewähren (das entspricht 40,6 Milliarden US-Dollar im Jahr 2020 über Kuhn, Loeb & Co.). Diese Kredite waren das erste große japanische Anleiheangebot an der Wall Street und stellten etwa die Hälfte der für den Krieg benötigten Mittel bereit Anstrengungsmaßnahmen Japans.
Die Niederlage Russlands gegen Japan führte 1905 zur Finanzkrise in St. Petersburg, angeführt von Alexander Parvus, einem Agenten der bolschewistischen Rothschilds. Es gelang nicht, den russischen Monarchen wie geplant zu stürzen.
Die Rothschilds begannen daraufhin den Ersten Weltkrieg, um den Zaren zu vernichten. Sie töteten zunächst den Erzherzog, um den Weg für einen Krieg zu ebnen, aber das reichte nicht aus. Dies wird im Roman „The Thirty-Nine Steps“ von John Buchan, dem späteren 15. Generalgouverneur Kanadas, erklärt.
Dieser Auszug aus seinem Roman „Die neununddreißig Schritte“ wurde leicht bearbeitet, aber meinen Quellen zufolge waren die Änderungen korrekt:
Im ersten Kapitel erzählt ein mysteriöser Fremder der Hauptfigur Hannay von einer „internationalen Verschwörung“, die darauf abzielt, die Armeen Russlands und Deutschlands gegeneinander auszuspielen. Der Konflikt werde sich durch die Ermordung des griechischen Ministerpräsidenten Karolidis verschärfen, erklärt der Unbekannte. (Eigentlich der Erzherzog) Der Fremde, der sich später als Franklin Scudder, ein britischer Agent, herausstellt, erzählt Hannay weiter, dass die „Rothschilds“, die „Russland mehr als alles andere hassen“, hinter der Verschwörung stecken:
„Ich erzähle Ihnen, was er mir gesagt hat, so gut ich es verstehen konnte. Weit hinter dem Rücken aller Regierungen und Armeen gab es eine große Untergrundbewegung, die von sehr gefährlichen Leuten organisiert wurde. Er ist zufällig darauf gestoßen; es faszinierte ihn; er ging weiter; und dann wurde ich erwischt. Mir wurde klar, dass die meisten Leute darin gebildete Anarchisten (Bolschewiki) waren, die Revolutionen machten, aber neben ihnen gab es Finanziers, die um Geld spielten.
„Ein kluger Mensch kann in einem fallenden Markt große Gewinne erzielen, und es passte für beide Klassen, Europa an den Ohren zu halten. Er erzählte mir einige seltsame Dinge, die viele Dinge erklärten, die mich verwirrten – was während des Krieges auf dem Balkan passierte, wie ein Staat plötzlich die Oberhand gewann, warum Bündnisse geschlossen und wieder gebrochen wurden, warum bestimmte Leute verschwanden und wo die Adern davon lagen Krieg kam her. Der Zweck der gesamten Verschwörung bestand darin, einen Streit zwischen Russland und Deutschland herbeizuführen. Als ich nach dem Grund fragte, sagte er, dass eine Gruppe von Anarchisten dachte, es würde ihnen eine Chance geben.
„Alles wäre in einem Schmelztiegel und sie würden erwarten, dass eine neue Welt entsteht. Die Kapitalisten scheffelten Schekel und machten ein Vermögen, indem sie die Reste aufkauften (Rothschild-Hyperinflation in Deutschland nach dem Krieg, als sie eine Billion Dollar verdienten). Das Kapital hat seiner Meinung nach weder Gewissen noch Vaterland; außerdem steckten die Rothschilds dahinter, und die Rothschilds hassten Russland mehr als alles andere auf der Welt. ‘Du interessierst dich?’ — er rief aus. „Sie wurden dreihundert Jahre lang verfolgt, und das ist eine Vergeltung für die Pogrome.“ Rothschilds sind überall, aber um ihn zu finden, muss man weit die Hintertreppe hinuntergehen.
„Nehmen Sie irgendein großes teutonisches Geschäftsunternehmen. Wenn Sie mit ihm zu tun haben, ist die erste Person, die Sie treffen, Prinz Von oder wie auch immer er heißt, ein eleganter junger Mann, der das Englisch von Eton und Harrow spricht. Aber er schneidet nicht das Eis. Wenn Ihr Unternehmen groß ist, stellen Sie sich hinter ihn und finden einen pompösen Westfalen mit gerunzelter Stirn und den Manieren eines Schweins. Er ist ein deutscher Geschäftsmann, der Ihre englischen Zeitungen zum Beben bringt. Aber wenn Sie einen großen Job machen und sicher sind, den wahren Chef zu erreichen, ist es zehn zu eins, dass Sie auf einen kleinen, blassgesichtigen Rothschild in einem Liegestuhl treffen, der Augen wie eine Klapperschlange hat. Ja, Herr, das ist der Mann, der jetzt die Welt regiert, und sein Messer befindet sich im Zarenreich, weil seine Tante empört war und sein Vater an einem Ein-Pferd-Platz an der Wolga ausgepeitscht wurde.“
Als nächstes gehen wir zu Benjamin Disraelis Coningsby über, um zu sehen, wie die Rothschilds jedes Land durch ihre Finanzmacht kontrollieren, indem sie ihre Finanzagenten in jedem Land einsetzen. Warum hat Disraeli das geschrieben? Er hatte 1844 im britischen Parlament nichts erreicht und dachte, wenn er über das Rothschild-Finanzsystem zur Weltkontrolle schreiben würde, würden sie sein Talent anerkennen, und es funktionierte. Sie machten ihn zum Premierminister.
Diese Passage beschreibt den internationalen Kontrollmechanismus. Jedes Land wird durch seinen eigenen Finanzminister kontrolliert.
„Ich habe Ihnen gerade gesagt, dass ich morgen in die Stadt fahre, weil ich es mir immer zur Regel gemacht habe, einzugreifen, wenn Regierungsangelegenheiten besprochen werden.“ Sonst mische ich mich nie ein. Ich höre in den Zeitungen von Frieden und Krieg, aber ich bin nie beunruhigt, außer wenn mir gesagt wird, dass Monarchen Schätze wollen; Dann weiß ich, dass die Monarchen es ernst meinen. „Vor einigen Jahren ist Russland auf uns zugekommen. Nun gab es keine Freundschaft zwischen dem Hof von St. Petersburg und meiner Familie. Sie hat Verbindungen in Holland, die ihr im Allgemeinen zur Verfügung standen; und unsere Erklärungen zugunsten der polnischen Juden, einer zahlreichen Rasse, aber der leidendsten und erniedrigtesten aller Stämme, gefielen dem Zaren nicht sehr. Die Umstände führten jedoch zu einer Annäherung zwischen den Romanows und Sidonia (Rothschilds Pseudonym im Roman). Ich habe beschlossen, selbst nach St. Petersburg zu gehen. Bei meiner Ankunft hatte ich ein Gespräch mit dem russischen Finanzminister Graf Kankrin; Ich habe den Sohn eines litauischen Juden gesehen. Das Darlehen stand im Zusammenhang mit spanischen Angelegenheiten; Ich beschloss, von Russland nach Spanien zu gehen. Ich bin ununterbrochen gereist. Unmittelbar nach meiner Ankunft hatte ich eine Audienz beim spanischen Minister, Señor Mendizabel; Ich sah jemanden wie mich, den Sohn von Nuevo Cristiano, einem Juden aus Aragon. Aufgrund der Ereignisse in Madrid reiste ich direkt nach Paris, um den Präsidenten des französischen Rates zu konsultieren. Ich habe den Sohn eines französischen Juden gesehen, einen Helden, einen kaiserlichen Marschall, und das zu Recht, denn wer sollte ein militärischer Held sein, wenn nicht diejenigen, die den Herrn der Heerscharen verehren?‘ „Ist Soult ein Jude?“ „Ja, und andere französische Marschälle und die berühmtesten; Massena zum Beispiel; sein richtiger Name war Manasse, aber zurück zu meiner Anekdote. Das Ergebnis unserer Beratungen war, dass man sich freundlicherweise an eine Nordmacht wenden und vermitteln sollte. Wir entschieden uns für Preußen; und der Ratspräsident stellte einen Antrag an den preußischen Minister, der einige Tage nach unserer Konferenz anwesend war. Graf Arnim betrat das Büro und ich sah einen preußischen Juden. Sie sehen also, mein lieber Coningsby, dass die Welt von Individuen regiert wird, die überhaupt nicht das sind, was sich die Außenstehenden von ihnen vorstellen.“
Weiter unten sehen wir, wie Parvus zusammen mit dem deutschen Kaiser, Feldmarschall von Hindenburg und General Erich Ludendorff die bolschewistische Revolution initiierte.
Die von Baron Edward de Rothschild ins Leben gerufene bolschewistische Revolution beseitigte seinen Erzfeind, den Zaren, und die Bolschewiki töteten den Zaren, seine Familie sowie alle Mitglieder der königlichen Familie und deren Familien in Russland. Letztendlich starben Dutzende Millionen Menschen. Die britische Regierung bot dem Baron daraufhin Palästina an, als Gegenleistung dafür, dass er den USA über J.P. Morgan den Befehl gab, in den Krieg einzutreten. So wurde die Balfour-Erklärung verabschiedet und die USA traten in den Krieg ein, obwohl sie kein Interesse daran hatten. General Ludendorff schwärmte in seinen Memoiren von der brillanten Aktion der Briten und bedauerte, dass er nicht selbst daran gedacht hatte, da ihr damaliger Verbündeter Türkei Palästina kontrollierte. Der Punkt ist, dass die Rothschilds nach Belieben die Seiten wechselten, als sich ihre Interessen änderten. Zuerst unterstützten sie Deutschland und dann England.
Lloyd George war die dynamische Kraft dahinter und erreichte sein Ziel, seinen Verbündeten Russland zu vernichten, der Istanbul als Kriegsbeute beanspruchte und erhielt, ihm die Kontrolle über Russlands Zugang zum Mittelmeer über den Bosporus verschaffte und eine Bedrohung für den Suez darstellte Der Kanal wurde zerstört, und Deutschland, das eine Flotte gegen England aufbaute, wurde zerstört. Das besiegte Russland erhielt Istanbul nicht und Deutschland verlor seine Flotte. Die Machenschaften der Rothschilds forderten das Leben von 10 Millionen Militärangehörigen und 10 Millionen Zivilisten.
Es entstand eine ziemliche Ironie, als der Cousin von Baron Edward de Rothschild, Baron Louis de Rothschild, den Zusammenbruch seiner Kreditanstalt im Jahr 1931 herbeiführte, was zum Zusammenbruch des gesamten deutschen Bankensystems führte, mit der unbeabsichtigten Machtübernahme Adolf Hitlers im Jahr 1933, was alles zunichte machte, was Baron Edward für seine Kontrolle über die Welt geschaffen hatte. Der Baron rettete Sir Winston Churchill, der beim Börsenkrach von 1929 sein gesamtes Geld verloren hatte, und beschloss, ihn in den Thron zu erheben, so wie Sir Solomon de Medina seinen Vorfahren, den Herzog von Marlborough, in den Thron erhoben hatte. Sir Winston wurde geschaffen, um Hitler zu vernichten, obwohl es der MI6 war, der Hitler in einen neuen Krieg mit Russland drängte.
Wieder einmal bestand der Zweck von Hitlers Aufstieg darin, Deutschland zu zwingen, erneut in Russland einzumarschieren, um Stalin zu stürzen, der praktisch die gesamte von Baron Edward de Rothschild gegründete bolschewistische Partei eliminiert hatte und zu mächtig wurde und mit seiner Landarmee eine Bedrohung für Britisch-Indien darstellte , wie der Zar vor ihm. In München gab es kein Appeasement, da es Teil eines Plans war, Deutschland zu gründen, um Russland zu zerstören, und Stalin war natürlich nicht eingeladen. Ziel war es, Deutschland auf einen Rückkampf zwischen Deutschland und Russland vorzubereiten, um beide erneut zu vernichten. Aus diesem Grund ernannte Lloyd George Churchill zum Kriegsführer. Churchill unterstützte diesen Plan. Der geopolitische Krieg zur Zerstörung Japans und Deutschlands, um sie an der Kontrolle über den eurasischen Kontinent zu hindern, wurde durch die Tatsache erschwert, dass Russland gestärkt aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg hervorging und es zusammen mit seinem Verbündeten Mao geschafft hatte, die Kontrolle über weite Teile Eurasiens zu erlangen. Die USA forderten Russland auf, als Stellvertreter in China einzumarschieren, um die Japaner zu säubern, und Russland gab seinem Verbündeten, dem Vorsitzenden Mao, japanische Waffen. Dies markierte den Beginn der chinesischen Revolution. Die russisch-chinesische Allianz erschütterte die Vereinigten Staaten, als Senator McCarthy den Verrat ankündigte. Die USA verloren den Zweiten Weltkrieg, der einzig und allein unternommen wurde, um Japan und Deutschland daran zu hindern, den eurasischen Kontinent zu übernehmen und so die Kontrolle über die Welt im Mackinder-Stil zu erlangen.
Dem Narren Chruschtschow gelang es, China als Verbündeten zu verlieren, und die USA gingen ein Bündnis mit dem Vorsitzenden Mao auf der einen Seite, Russland und der NATO auf der anderen Seite ein, und es war dieses Bündnis der USA mit China, das zum Zusammenbruch Russlands führte. Sie wurden überflügelt. Denken Sie an Doktrinen wie den Nationalsozialismus, den die USA derzeit in der Ukraine unterstützen, oder den Kommunismus, die im Vergleich zur Geopolitik des Machtgleichgewichts nichts bedeuten. Jetzt sind Russland und China wieder Verbündete, und die USA versuchen, beide gleichzeitig zu bekämpfen, um ihnen die Kontrolle über die dominierende eurasische Landmasse zu entziehen. Unterdessen wurden die USA zu einem Papiertiger, der einen Großteil seiner Industrie verlor und vor dem nationalen und internationalen Bankrott stand, während seine inländischen und internationalen Defizite außer Kontrolle gerieten.
Heute gibt es in Deutschland keinen preußischen Offiziersstand und seine Armee kann nicht eingesetzt werden, da sie sich im völligen Niedergang befindet. Der Wiederaufbau wird ein oder zwei Jahrzehnte dauern, da Russland seit 2000 eingenommen wurde, und es gibt keine Garantie dafür, dass die verfallene deutsche Bevölkerung jemals wieder eine Militärmacht werden kann. Somit bedeutet Deutschland militärisch nichts. Der Rest der NATO ist relativ nutzlos. Von den 100.000 Soldaten in Europa verfügen die USA über 10.000 Kampftruppen, und die europäischen NATO-Streitkräfte sind im Allgemeinen von sehr schlechter Qualität. Die USA nutzen die neueste Waffe in ihrem Arsenal – die von den USA kontrollierten SWIFT CHIPS –, um Russland zu zerstören. Dies kann jedoch zu seiner eigenen Selbstzerstörung führen, da dieses System ein Handelsdefizit von einer Billion Dollar pro Jahr finanziert, während das inländische Haushaltsdefizit 2,8 Billionen Dollar beträgt. Wenn sie den Finanzkrieg verlieren, werden sie das Gleiche wie Großbritannien tun.
HAUSHALTSPROGNOSE FÜR DAS GESCHÄFTSJAHR 2021.
AUSGABEN – 6,8 Billionen US-Dollar
EINNAHMEN – 3,8 Billionen US-Dollar
DEFIZIT – 3,0 Billionen US-Dollar
Staatsschulden (Ende des Geschäftsjahres) – 23,0 Billionen US-Dollar
Noch einmal: Wie passt Russland in all das hinein? Die Rothschilds versuchen verzweifelt, durch ihre Agenten im Land die Kontrolle über Russland zurückzugewinnen und Russland von Putin zu befreien, der um jeden Preis verzweifelt nach Frieden strebt. Der Haken dabei ist, dass Putin nicht Russland, sondern die Streitkräfte und Sicherheitsdienste (FSB, SVR, GRU) kontrolliert. Der Plan besteht darin, wieder die Kontrolle über Russland zu erlangen, dann erneut gegen den Iran vorzugehen, die Theokratie zu stürzen, trotz der kurzfristigen Zweckmäßigkeit einer Lockerung der Sanktionen, und dann mit diesen Schritten China zu isolieren, um es zu unterwerfen. Das ist das Prinzip „Teile und herrsche“.