TRAICIÓN DE ESPAÑA AL SÁHARA Y VENTA DE CANARIAS
VIVA PALESTINA LIBRE
VIVA LA SOLIDARIDAD DE CUBA CON EL PUEBLO PALESTINO
https://www.ivoox.com/player_ej_125292250_6_1.html?c1=b20000
Canciller ruso Serguéi Lavrov intercambia con jóvenes del Festival de la Juventud
El ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de Rusia, Serguéi Lavrov, exhortó a los delegados del Festival Mundial de la Juventud a una mirada multipolar en la política internacional
Recuerdan en Venezuela a Hugo Chávez a 11 años de su siembra
El onceno aniversario de la partida física a la inmortalidad del comandante Hugo Chávez (1954-2013) será recordado hoy en Venezuela con diversas actividades políticas, culturales y movilizaciones.
La conmemoración tendrá como centro el mausoleo donde descansan sus restos en el Cuartel de la Montaña, donde desde horas tempranas el pueblo y la juventud del Partido Socialista Unido (PSUV) le rendirá tributo eterno a su guía imperecedero.
Ana Cabezas, directora de la Fundación Comandante Eterno Hugo Chávez, declaró la víspera a Venezolana de Televisión que como cada 5 de marzo, el pueblo acudirá a ese sitio sagrado de la patria a “rendir honores” al líder bolivariano.
Explicó que el programa incluye recorridos por las salas de exposiciones y el público podrá apreciar la muestra fotográfica denominada “La esperanza está en la calle”, lema de la conmemoración.
La joven venezolana apuntó que la jornada abarcará hasta el 26 de marzo en que se cumplen tres décadas de la salida del llamado aquí Comandante Eterno de la cárcel de Yare, e inició una gira por toda la nación para expandir el Movimiento Bolivariano Revolucionario 200.
Cabezas expresó que los niños tendrán también su espacio con actividades lúdicas con el objetivo de acercarlos no solo al comandante, sino también conservar sus valores y forma de actuar.
De estos espacios, precisó, tratamos que además de divertirse, los niños puedan sentirse seguros, divertirse y salir con una lección aprendida porque conocen de la historia de Venezuela a través del comandante, de El Libertador Simón Bolívar y del pueblo.
A las 16:30 hora local, se escuchará la salva de honor que cada día estremece toda Caracas, indicó.
El presidente venezolano, Nicolás Maduro, manifestó ayer en su cuenta X que Chávez “sigue con nosotros”, en cada lucha, en cada acción y en el corazón de cada uno de nosotros, los que amamos esta tierra.
“¡Viva Chávez por Siempre!”, enfatizó.
En una reunión la víspera con el alto mando político, Maduro destacó que el líder bolivariano se fue invicto a su inmortalidad.
Destacó que la Revolución cuenta con cinco generaciones “unidas e integradas” como resultado de la obra, espíritu, métodos y “personalidad magnifica de nuestro comandante Chávez”.
También el PSUV realizará este martes una gran movilización denominada de los “claveles rojos” que partirá desde distintos puntos de la Gran Caracas y confluirá en el Cuartel de la Montaña, en la parroquia 23 de enero.
FUENTE: prensa-latina.cu
Red internacional TV Brics amplia su agenda informativa al idioma español
La Red Internacional TV Brics, con sede central en Rusia, amplió su trabajo a inicios del mes de marzo con una nueva versión en idioma español de su portal de información web, así como, en la difusión por internet de su canal de televisión.
Red internacional TV Brics amplia su agenda informativa al idioma español
Países del Brics superan al G7 en paridad de poder adquisitivo
Los países del Brics ya superan al Grupo de los Siete (G7) en algunos indicadores macroeconómicos, y esta diferencia irá en aumento, afirmó hoy en exclusiva a TASS el asesor del presidente de Rusia, Yuri Ushakov.
«En términos de paridad de poder adquisitivo, el Brics ya superó al G7: nuestra asociación representa el 35,6 por ciento del Producto Interno Bruto mundial, mientras que el G7 aporta el 30,3, y para 2028, la situación cambiará aún más a favor de los Brics, con 36,6 por ciento frente a 27,8», detalló Ushakov.
Además, recordó que el presidente ruso, Vladímir Putin, subrayó este tema en su discurso ante la Asamblea Federal.
«El peso colectivo de los Estados miembros de la asociación en la economía global es de 58,9 billones de dólares. El Brics representa más de un tercio de la superficie terrestre del planeta, el 45 por ciento de la población mundial, y más del 40 por ciento de la producción total de petróleo”, explicó.
Asimismo, señaló que durante el período relativamente corto de su existencia, la asociación Brics (que actualmente reúne a Brasil, Rusia, India, China, Sudáfrica, Emiratos Árabes Unidos, Arabia Saudita, Etiopía, Egipto e Irán) se ha desarrollado y es un mecanismo de interacción multinivel de la agenda global.
Ushakov destacó además que, en la cumbre de la ciudad rusa de Ufá en 2015, se anunció el lanzamiento de las primeras instituciones financieras de la asociación, el Nuevo Banco de Desarrollo y el Fondo de Reservas de Contingencia, lo que demuestra su creciente influencia en la economía mundial.
La presidencia del Brics pasó a Rusia el 1 de enero de 2024 y durará hasta finales del año. El principal acontecimiento será la cumbre de jefes de Estado, que se celebrará en la ciudad rusa de Kazán en octubre de 2024, así como los Juegos Deportivos en junio.
Al respecto, Ushakov aclaró que estas competiciones que se celebrarán en formato abierto, y a las cuales están invitados atletas de más de 60 países, y que incluyen 29 deportes, no es una respuesta a las restricciones ilegales y discriminatorias impulsadas por Occidente.
Anteriormente estos juegos se organizaron en Durban, Sudáfrica, recordó el experto, y este año Rusia organiza estos concursos, garantizando a todos los Estados interesados igualdad de acceso a la plena participación en ellos.
“Por cierto, los equipos de los países Brics estuvieron ampliamente representados en los innovadores Juegos del Futuro que terminaron recientemente en Kazán», resaltó Ushakov, quien dirige el comité organizador de la presidencia rusa de la asociación.
- TEMAS:
- BRICS
- Economía Política
#Mujeres solidarias en #València con el país más solidario del mundo (Video)
#Solidaridad #Cuba Cuba jamás ha dudado en ser solidaria con cualquier país que lo ha necesitado. Desde las Brigadas Henry Reeve, que han enviado profesionales sanitarios cubanos a decenas de países en situación de catástrofe o pandemia, hasta proyectos de alfabetización por todo el mundo, Cuba ejerce la máxima solidaridad internacionalista cada año en cientos […]
#Mujeres solidarias en #València con el país más solidario del mundo (Video)
https://thefreeonline.com/2024/03/06/mujeres-solidarias-en-valencia-con-el-pais-mas-solidario-del-mundo-video/
A 64 años del primer acto terrorista de la #CIA #ContraCuba
El 4 de marzo de 1960 ocurrió el primer acto terrorista cometido por Estados Unidos contra la Revolución cubana, cuando hicieron explotar el buque francés La Coubre, en el puerto de La Habana, con el fin de impedir que Cuba adquiriera en Bélgica, granadas para los fusiles FAL y dejarla sin capacidad de repeler la […]
Historical Analysis: How the Green Party Betrayed the People of Ireland During the Banking Bailout of 2010
By Mark Keenan
In a new book titled The Lies of Green Politics and How the Green Party Betrayed the People of Ireland, I detail a number of the main falsehoods of modern green politics; and I also comprehensively detail how the Green Party betrayed the people of Ireland during the bailout of privately-owned banks in 2010.
The Green Party (GP) was in a coalition government with the Ireland’s largest political party at that time, the Fianna Fáil party.
The Green leaders had supported Fianna Fáil in the implementation of a highly controversial banking guarantee. Following a crisis meeting in government buildings on the night of 29th September 2008, a small group gathered in government buildings to make the biggest financial decision in Irish history. The Irish government, in consultation with privately-owned banks, decided to guarantee all deposits and the bulk of other liabilities in the following banks and building societies: AIB, Bank of Ireland, Anglo Irish Bank, Irish Life and Permanent, EBS, and Irish Nationwide. This was estimated as totalling €440 billion of liabilities.
- The cost of the guarantee: what the taxpayer has spent: €440 billion
- Fees earned by the Government from the banks on the guarantees: €33 billion
- Amount of State money injected or pledged to the banking system: €25 billion
In essence, this process unjustly passed these massive banking debts onto the shoulders of the Irish people, the overwhelming majority of whom had absolutely nothing to do with the impending failure of these privately owned commercial banks.
Banks had flooded the Irish economy with cheap credit, i.e., debt money credited out of nothing via the trick of fractional reserve banking.
The following video provides the basic, but effective, analogy of a bathtub filled with water as credit. The analogy enables us to see how the whole process is based on a fraud – note that the interest component has never been created, thus capital plus interest can never be repaid across the board (that water does not exist) and the bathtub soon becomes empty.
The GP leaders in Ireland at that time were complicit and pivotal in the process of bailing out the banks. A consequence was the loss of Ireland’s economic sovereignty as, of course, the government itself then needed a bailout from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and European Central Bank (ECB). Thus, many people in Ireland at that time regarded the GP leaders as traitors.
The GP supported the banking bailout despite criticisms of the government’s banking bailout plans by almost 50 economists. With the implementation of the banking garauntee, the people of Ireland were essentially forced by the government to pay for the gambling debts of these commercial banks and the international bondholders involved. To put this in perspective consider that these bondholders (a long list of mostly privately-owned banks and international financial institutions, as well as some wealthy private individuals) held wealth and assets that was over 100 times the wealth of the entire population of Ireland (about 4 million people). Yet, the Irish government (lapdogs of the banker-controlled EU) were bailing them out – it was a total scam.
The common corporate media narrative is that commercial banks in any country are somehow ‘Irish’, ‘Greek’, ‘Portugese’, or somehow native to whatever country they are located in. However, this is a misnomer or word trick, because commercial banks are privately-owned corporations with no national allegiance.
The real culprits are not any country, such as Germany or the UK. The real culprits are the banks, and the banker-controlled institutions of the EU and the IMF, and the Irish government politicians that sold the Irish people down the river rather than go against the political orthodoxy. Via deceptive policies, the EU has systematically undermined the people of the EU countries, and advanced the corporate-communist type ‘one world government’ political project of so-called globalists. A world in which mega-banks and mega-corporations pull the strings.
The following video is a general approximation of this tragic story.
The Boom Bust Bailout Process that Places Nations in Debt
Furthermore, the media-spun narrative was that Ireland was having an economic crisis, however, this was a corporate media promoted lie. Ireland as a trading entity was making, and continued to make, a profit of around €40 billion per annum throughout the so-called national crisis. In reality, private banking insolvency was intentionally twisted by the spin doctors into a ‘national’ problem and a bailout scam in which vast debts were unjustly heaped onto the taxpayers.
15 years ago, as a person working in the environmental sector, I was for a short time an active member of the Green Party of Ireland. That time coincided with the bailout process so I have an inside story and perspective on the debacle. At that time, I quickly became angered and disgusted by the actions of the GP leadership, as did many other people, and indeed many GP members. I left the Green Party in disgust, 14 years ago (in 2010) for a litany of reasons, including the actions of the party leaders during this infamous bailout by the Irish government.
These actions were regarded by myself and many people as a traitorous betrayal of the people living in Ireland. My emails to the GP leaders at that time informed them I did not support these traitorous actions. I put my name to, and endorsed, the following message to the GP leadership at that time:
“I ask all of the members of the green party to do the decent thing and bring down the government before they sell our country out. For the sake of the people of Ireland don’t commit economic treason to our beloved country just for the sake of a pension.”
At that time (2009 and 2010) I wrote a blog criticising the whole corrupt bailout process/scam. The experience taught me that modern democracy is a complete sham. He ‘ins’ become the ‘outs’ and the ‘outs’ become the ‘ins’. Meanwhile it is the international bankers beyond the revolving door of national politics that have control of money creation and thus actual political power.
I finally got around to collating my notes, along with relevant email communications, into a short book, which I have published here for the historical record. I have published this short book now as, although the bailout story was well documented by commentators at the time, it appears that few young people in Ireland today are even aware of the actions of their GP ‘climate heroes’ between 2008 and 2010, as part of an Irish government coalition that consigned generations of Irish people to debt slavery.
It appeared to me at the time in 2010 that at least 50% of the GP party members also left the party being very unhappy about the actions of the leadership. Some members perceived, as many Irish people did, that the GP was selling out the country. Furthermore, the GP share of the national vote was rightly decimated at the next general election.
Despite national level protests at that time against the bailout, and calls to bring down the government, the GP leaders had proceeded to support the largest political party Fianna Fail in what amounted to the handover of Irish economic sovereignty to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and European Central Bank (ECB). Worse still, the Minister for the Environment, the Green Party’s Eamon Ryan, was regularly heard on TV and radio strongly supporting the bailout of the privately-owned banks and the ‘intervention’ of the IMF and ECB.
This bailout really was also a bailout of privately-owned European and international banks which would have collapsed otherwise. Of course, banks do not really collapse as their parent central banks simply conjure endless amounts of more debt-money out of thin air, and the whole privately-owned debt-money scam network lives on. The whole banking bailout process is in actuality a scam that has been implemented in many countries – it involves a boom-bust-bailout process that heaps debt burdens onto governments, and thus the taxpaying people in that country. Regardless of whether it is a boom or a bust or bailout the international mega-banks/bankers are always the winners in this rigged process. For more information on this boom-bust-bailout cycle see my book Demonic Economics and the Tricks of the Bankers.
This bailout bill amounted to a national debt in perpetuity for future generations so colossal it could never be paid. The net cost to the Irish taxpayer has been estimated at somewhere between €64 billion to €100 billion.
To this day Ireland over a decade later, Ireland has one of the highest per capita debt burdens in the world. According to RTE (the national broadcaster) the national debt stood at €226 billion at the end of 2022, according to the Department of Finance’s Annual Report on Public Debt in Ireland, see Endnote . That is equal to €44,250 for every man, woman and child in the country.
Therefore, the Fianna Fáil Green Party coalition government consigned the people of Ireland to generations of debt slavery. The debt was, and is, so large that all that can be paid is the interest on it each year. The interest on the national debt in Ireland is in the region of €6-10 billion per annum, which amounts to a chain around the neck of the Irish taxpayers. Unsurprisingly, this was all implemented without consulting the Irish people via a referendum. According to a poll by the Irish Independent newspaper in 2010, a substantial majority of the Irish people wanted the state to default on debts to bondholders (see Endnote ), therefore, it appears the GP leaders ignored the wishes of the majority of the Irish people.
The Green Party role (the role of the party leaders and ministers at that time) is significant because the party held the balance of power in the coalition government, and could have brought the government down to stop the entire process in its tracks; or could have insisted on a national referendum on this topic of generational importance – but they did not. A few poorly qualified green politicians leading the party arrogantly presumed they could make decisions for an entire nation of four million people.
It is notable that in contrast to Ireland, the Government of Iceland did not bailout the private banks and stood up against the IMF. The above topics are described in detail in the book The Lies of Green Politics and How the Green Party Betrayed the People of Ireland. The book details additional topics including:
- Why did the GP leadership support this controversial banking bailout? The policy deal that was done to implement more so-called green policies in the new programme for government.
- The GP leaders also supported Fianna fail in the creation of the controversial National Assets Management Agency (NAMA), and the implementation of consequent austerity measures against the Irish people.
- GP councillors and members that resigned in protest at the actions of the GP leaders.
- The GP leaders and the NAMA controversy. The leadership supported the creation of NAMA against the wishes of many of its own members. Quotes from GP members that opposed the formation of NAMA.
- The GP leaders and the Lisbon Treaty Controversy. The GP leadership supported a YES vote during the outrageously staged second Lisbon Treaty referendum, thereby blatantly disregarding the democratic vote of the Irish people during the first Lisbon Treaty referendum.
- Accusations of irregularity and fraud in the GP convention vote on the Lisbon Treaty.
- Note that the Lisbon Treaty was deemed by those commentators that could see truth, as the final nail in the coffin of political freedom in Ireland, and in the countries of Europe. Since then the vast majority of national government policy has been dictated by the institutions of the EU.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Mark Gerard Keenan is a former scientist at the UK Government Dept. of Energy and Climate Change, and at the United Nations Environment Division. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG). He is author of the following books available on amazon.com:
- Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability
- CO2 Climate Hoax – How Bankers Hijacked the Real Environment Movement
- Godless Fake Science
- The Lies of Green Politics and How the Green Party Betrayed the People of Ireland
- No Worries No Virus
- Demonic Economics and the Tricks of the Bankers
- Transcending the Covid-19 Deception
- Fake Moon Landings and the Lies of NASA
Donate for Mark’s articles here via Paypal.
Notes
[1] Source: https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2023/0203/1353529-national-debt-report/
[2] Source: https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/default-say-the-people-26703729.html
Featured image: Sticker on van window in Dublin reacts to banking crisis (Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0)
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Mark Keenan, Global Research, 2024
The Power Behind the Throne and the Bankers’ Forever Wars.
We must take a stand or let our children fall, it’s that simple.
By Alex Krainer
Last week, former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss gave us a stonker of a revelation which, I believe deserves to be set to the record. Truss appeared in Steve Bannon‘s War Room and said this:
“What I found out when I got into No. 10 is, I thought that if I got to the top of the tree, I would be able to implement those conservative policies… And what I discovered was that I was not holding the levers. The levers were held by the Bank of England, by the Office of Budget Responsibility, they weren’t held by the Prime Minister or the Chancellor…”
Truss goes on to point out the obvious problem with this: you can sack the Prime Minister, but you can’t sack the BOE officials who hold the levers of power. Around the same time of this revelation, Glenn Beck dropped a similar clue. In his interview with Tucker Carlson published on 21 February 2024 he shared a story of his encounter with George W. Bush:
I thought of something George Bush told me in the Oval Office. I was asking about the policies and how they were going to change, and he said, “Glenn, don’t worry, whoever sits behind this desk, in that chair, is going to have the same advice given by the same advisors and they’ll realize, the President’s hands are tied.” I walked out of that room horrified… Why do we even have elections?”
What G. W. Bush had revealed to Beck and what Liz Truss discovered when she got to the top of the tree, has been the defining feature behind our “democracies” for a very long time. Former British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli said in 1844 that, “The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.” Sir William Pitt, Prime Minister in 1770 said that, “There is something behind the throne greater than the King himself.”
The Power ‘Behind the Throne’ Are the Bankers
In untangling the causal factors behind the many crises we face today, the trail of breadcrumbs always leads to the international banking cartel which appears to have the determining influence shaping the system of governance under which our societies operate. This network likely constitutes the very “monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” that President John F. Kennedy had warned us about.
As a famous member of that cartel proclaimed, “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws!” At the money power’s receiving end, Napoleon Bonaparte understood that relationship all too well: “When a government is dependent upon bankers for money, they and not the leaders of the government control the situation.” This, it would seem, is how it is today.
This Is Britain’s War. “The Drive for Nuclear War”
In his 1965 book “Tragedy and Hope,” Carroll Quigley warned us that, “The powers of financial capitalism had [a] far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. … The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and direct injury of all other economic groups.” That world system of financial control is what’s today being promoted as the “rules based global order.”
Bankers and Forever Wars
In particular, the banking interests appear to be the key movers behind the perpetual warfare we are witnessing today. The better we understand the way the systems work, the more the saying, “all wars are bankers’ wars” rings true. US Congressman Ron Paul said that it was no coincidence that the century of central banking coincided with a century of total war.
Today we know, for example, that Adolf Hitler and his National Socialists were cultivated and lavishly funded by prominent Wall Street bankers (including George W. Bush’s grampa Prescott Bush) and that the multinational corporations they controlled provided the technology and assistance for Germany’s rearmament. The shadow operator steering the course of events was Bank of England’s Montagu Norman who was the best friend and confidant of his German counterpart Hjalmar Schacht. Few of those details have made it into our history curriculum, but the whole point of militarizing and Nazifying Germany was to invade and subjugate Russia. In 1935, Lord Lothian assured a delegation of visiting ministers from Germany that, “they would cut through Russia as through butter.”
In the most recent past, it was Ukraine which was militarized and Nazified to strike against Russia with the same powers behind the throne pulling the levers. As the US-installed Prime Minister of Ukraine, Arseniy Yatsenyuk spoke appreciatively in 2014, “… international bankers are ready to help us. … We would not have survived without the international assistance.”
After Breaking Ukraine, They’ll Use European Nations Next
These discoveries should be profoundly disturbing. As the Ukrainian bludgeon broke against Russia, there is every reason for us to expect that they’ll turn to transforming other European nations to serve the same purpose. That process is now under way as we can hear from the growing chorus of European leaders talking about militarization, conscription, and the prospect of war against Russia. We should not be complacent in the face of these mad musings. The vast majority of Ukrainian people were in favor of peace and normalization of relations with Russia. Yet the powers behind the throne determined otherwise and were able to sacrifice half a million young Ukrainian men and destroy the lives of millions.
Unless we accept that in the near future our children also be sacrificed for bankers’ pursuit of Russian collateral, we need to shine the spotlight at those behind the thronewho are pulling the levers and pushing us into war. It is our duty today to push against them with all our might, creativity and determination. Anything short of that risks turning more European nations into what Ukraine is today. And no, it has never been about democracy nor about freedom. It is strictly about banking and about the collateral.
It’s About Collateral, Not About “Democracy”
All the money in circulation represents debt. Debt represents assets on the bankers’ balance sheets. To conjure up more debt, they need to control the collateral: it directly boosts their wealth and power over us. To all the rest of us it’s all the same: whether we pay money to Gazprom for our gas or to Royal Dutch Shell, we still have to pay.
That’s a LOT of collateral to turn into financialized flows for our banks, if only we could crack that nut open somehow…
Even to the Royal Dutch Shell it wouldn’t matter: they could simply buy Russian resources from Russia and resell it at home for a profit. Truly, the only group in society to whom the control of collateral makes any difference are the bankers, making them the one main group with the incentive to foment forever wars for control of resources. They won’t hesitate to go nuclear and sacrifice one nation after another to achieve this.
Lord Acton prophesied long ago that, “the issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the bankers.” This fight is now upon us. The “monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” is clearly waging an undeclared war on humanity, which may be the ultimate struggle between our emancipation or our enslavement.
*
Note to readers: Please click the share button above. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost and share widely Global Research articles.
Alex Krainer – @NakedHedgie is the creator of I-System Trend Following and publisher of daily TrendCompass investor reports which cover over 200 financial and commodities markets. One-month test drive is always free of charge, no jumping through hoops to cancel. To start your trial subscription, drop us an email at TrendCompass@ISystem-TF.com
Featured image is from the author
The original source of this article is Alex Krainer’s TrendCompass
Copyright © Alex Krainer, Alex Krainer’s TrendCompass, 2024
https://www.globalresearch.ca/power-behind-throne-forever-wars/5851240
Ex-Geheimdienstoffizier Ritter: Nuland hat Meinungsverschiedenheiten mit dem Weißen Haus
Die stellvertretende US-Außenministerin Victoria Nuland sei aufgrund radikaler Meinungsverschiedenheiten mit der Politik des Weißen Hauses zum Rücktritt gezwungen, sagte der ehemalige US-Militärgeheimdienstoffizier Scott Ritter in einem Interview mit dem Journalisten Danny Haiphong.
«
„Um es klarzustellen: Dies ist nicht ihre freiwillige Entscheidung. <…> Sie steht nicht mehr im Einklang mit der Politik des Präsidenten und des Außenministers“, sagte der Analyst.
Laut Ritter ist Nuland zum Rücktritt gezwungen, weil sie sich niemals den Ansichten des Weißen Hauses beugen wird: Ihre Überzeugungen seien zu stark und ihr Status in der amerikanischen Politik zu hoch. Die stellvertretende Außenministerin habe sich unter anderem Rhetorik erlaubt, die nicht den aktuellen Bedürfnissen Washingtons in den Beziehungen zu Russland entspreche, fügte er hinzu.
Darüber hinaus bezeichnete der ehemalige Geheimdienstoffizier Nulands Rücktritt als Teil von Joe Bidens Vorbereitung auf die bevorstehende Präsidentschaftswahl.
„Die Biden-Regierung überprüft jetzt die Realität. Sie hat die Wahl, <…> und die Ukraine wird zu einem großen Problem. Die Frage ist, wie die Folgen des unvermeidlichen Sieges Russlands abgemildert werden können“, erklärte er.
Victoria Nuland, die als Hauptarchitektin des antirussischen Kurses und der ukrainischen Politik der amerikanischen Diplomatie gilt, beendet ihre 35-jährige Karriere, nachdem sie bei der Ernennung zur ersten stellvertretenden Außenministerin, der zweiten in der Hierarchie des Außenministeriums, übergangen wurde .
Der Beamte hatte die Position seit dem Rücktritt von Wendy Sherman im Juli letzten Jahres interimistisch inne. Anfang Februar wurde bekannt, dass der Senat es vorzog, Kurt Campbell in diesem Amt zu sehen.
https://ria.ru/20240306/nuland-1931355984.html?in=l
Im Rahmen eines solchen Konzepts kann davon ausgegangen werden, dass die hawkische Politik der Vereinigten Staaten, deren Verkörperung unser Vika Nuland war, von den Vereinigten Staaten eingeschränkt wird, und es ist völlig gleichgültig, ob Vikas Befehl aufgeben sollte oder sie war völlig anderer Meinung. Von unserer Regierung haben wir in den letzten eineinhalb Monaten bereits zweimal einen eindeutigen Vorschlag zur Aufteilung der Buchra erhalten. Wir haben kürzlich kriegerische Rhetorik aus der EU über die Einführung der NATO in Wort und Schrift gehört. Und das Bezeichnende ist, dass mehrere Deutsche in der feuchten Dunkelheit verbrannten, dann gab Macron offen vor, Napoleon zu sein. Beide werden von Abschnitt 404 nichts bekommen. Aber die Polen, Rumänen und Ungarn sind die Hauptnutznießer, gemessen an Medwedews Leistung. Sie müssen jedoch verstehen, dass sie alle geplanten Akquisitionen nur mit der Erlaubnis und Zustimmung Moskaus erhalten. Meiner Meinung nach kann dies nur in einem Fall passieren – diese Länder müssen den Status der Blockfreien annehmen, d. h. Verlassen Sie die NATO. Wie kann das passieren – wenn die USA die NATO verlassen? Diese Vereinbarung entspricht den Interessen aller Parteien mit Ausnahme der Deutschen und der Franzosen, die jedoch von Anfang an als Hauptakteure in diesem Schlamassel bezeichnet wurden. Deshalb hören wir von dort ein Stöhnen. Wir werden sehen, wie alle Beteiligten eine solche Operation formalisieren werden. Aber für die Vereinigten Staaten ist es jetzt notwendig, da rauszukommen (aus Bukry) und dabei ihr Gesicht zu wahren (nicht nach dem afghanischen Szenario). Dazu müssen Sie unbedingt Ihre äußere Rhetorik ändern. Deshalb erhielt Vichka den Befehl „Ugh! Komm zu mir“
Toria und das herrschende Team sind Mitglieder derselben zionistischen Gruppe. Nachdem sichergestellt wurde, dass der Kongress keine Gelder zuweist, gibt es natürlich nichts zu stehlen, was bedeutet, dass es an der Zeit ist, das Land zu verlassen. Unter dem Deckmantel der Meinungsverschiedenheit kann man still und leise ausziehen, um keine Massenflucht zu provozieren. Aber das ist für viele ein Signal, sie werden es mit Füßen treten, ohne auf die Wahlen zu warten, sie sind im Voraus verloren. Und die Hauptsache ist, dass jeder versteht, dass er kein Geld hat, um interne Probleme zu lösen, und vor allem keine geistigen Fähigkeiten. Sie sind nicht einmal stark in Wirtschaftswissenschaften, sie haben ihre Vorstellungskraft verloren, obwohl sie auf ihrem Gebiet würdige Geschäftsleute sind.
Sie müssen unseren Ökonomen einladen, der sich mit politischer Ökonomie auskennt und sich gut mit der Struktur der Vereinigten Staaten auskennt.
Im Allgemeinen können wir sagen, dass Toria ein Präzedenzfall ist, und zwar in zunehmender Reihenfolge. Wenn der Zubringer geschlossen ist und der „Verbrecher“ von allen Seiten heiß ist, dann haben die Behörden keine Zeit, zumal sie nicht arbeiten.
Wahrscheinlich Argentinien, es gibt keine anderen Optionen.
Der Friedensstifter 